the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comparison of observation- and inventory-based methane emissions for eight large global emitters
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu
Glen P. Peters
Richard Engelen
Sander Houweling
Dominik Brunner
Aki Tsuruta
Bradley Matthews
Prabir K. Patra
Dmitry Belikov
Rona L. Thompson
Lena Höglund-Isaksson
Wenxin Zhang
Arjo J. Segers
Giuseppe Etiope
Giancarlo Ciotoli
Philippe Peylin
Frédéric Chevallier
Tuula Aalto
Robbie M. Andrew
David Bastviken
Antoine Berchet
Grégoire Broquet
Giulia Conchedda
Stijn N. C. Dellaert
Hugo Denier van der Gon
Johannes Gütschow
Jean-Matthieu Haussaire
Ronny Lauerwald
Tiina Markkanen
Jacob C. A. van Peet
Isabelle Pison
Pierre Regnier
Espen Solum
Marko Scholze
Maria Tenkanen
Francesco N. Tubiello
Guido R. van der Werf
John R. Worden
Related authors
Accurate national methane (CH4) emission estimates are essential for tracking progress towards climate goals. This study compares estimates from Finland, which use different methods and scales, and shows how well a global model estimates emissions within a country. The bottom-up estimates vary a lot, but constraining them with atmospheric CH4 measurements brought the estimates closer together. We also highlight the importance of quantifying natural emissions alongside anthropogenic emissions.
We estimate 2019 Brazilian fire carbon monoxide (CO) emissions using CO retrievals from multiple satellites in a new top-down inversion framework. The retrievals strongly constrain fire emissions and complement existing inventories. National-scale posterior emissions align well with the new Global Fire Emissions Database v5.1, supporting progress in fire emission models. Yet, posterior emissions in the Cerrado and Caatinga are systematically higher than inventories; we discuss potential drivers.
Accurate national methane (CH4) emission estimates are essential for tracking progress towards climate goals. This study compares estimates from Finland, which use different methods and scales, and shows how well a global model estimates emissions within a country. The bottom-up estimates vary a lot, but constraining them with atmospheric CH4 measurements brought the estimates closer together. We also highlight the importance of quantifying natural emissions alongside anthropogenic emissions.
climate-assessmentworkflow that was used in the IPCC AR6 Working Group III report. The paper provides key insight for anyone wishing to understand the assessment of climate outcomes of mitigation pathways in the context of the Paris Agreement.
Cited articles
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published. Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
- Article
(3306 KB) - Full-text XML