Articles | Volume 13, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-447-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-447-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Synthesis of global actual evapotranspiration from 1982 to 2019
Abdelrazek Elnashar
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information
Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100094, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Department of Natural Resources, Faculty of African Postgraduate
Studies, Cairo University, Giza, 12613, Egypt
Linjiang Wang
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information
Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100094, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Bingfang Wu
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information
Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100094, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Weiwei Zhu
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information
Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100094, China
Hongwei Zeng
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information
Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100094, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
Related authors
Sadia Bibi, Tingju Zhu, Ashraf Rateb, Bridget R. Scanlon, Muhammad Aqeel Kamran, Abdelrazek Elnashar, Ali Bennour, and Ci Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1725–1750, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1725-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1725-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We assessed 13 global models using GRACE satellite data over 29 river basins. Simulated seasonal water storage cycles showed discrepancies compared to GRACE. The models overestimated seasonal amplitude in boreal basins and showed underestimation in tropical, arid, and temperate zones, with phase differences of 2–3 months compared to GRACE in cold basins and of 1 month in temperate, arid, and semi-arid basins. Seasonal amplitude and phase differences provide insights for model improvement.
Miao Zhang, Bingfang Wu, Hongwei Zeng, Guojin He, Chong Liu, Shiqi Tao, Qi Zhang, Mohsen Nabil, Fuyou Tian, José Bofana, Awetahegn Niguse Beyene, Abdelrazek Elnashar, Nana Yan, Zhengdong Wang, and Yiliang Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4799–4817, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4799-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4799-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Cropping intensity (CI) is essential for agricultural land use management, but fine-resolution global CI is not available. We used multiple satellite data on Google Earth Engine to develop a first 30 m resolution global CI (GCI30). GCI30 performed well, with an overall accuracy of 92 %. GCI30 not only exhibited high agreement with existing CI products but also provided many spatial details. GCI30 can facilitate research on sustained cropland intensification to improve food production.
Fuyou Tian, Bingfang Wu, Hongwei Zeng, Miao Zhang, Weiwei Zhu, Nana Yan, Yuming Lu, and Yifan Li
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 855–880, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-855-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-855-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study introduces GMIE, a high-resolution global map of irrigated cropland at 100 m resolution, covering 403.17 Mha and utilizing irrigation performance under drought stress. We found that 23.4 % of global cropland is irrigated, with the most extensive areas in India, China, the United States, and Pakistan. We identified the distribution of central pivot systems commonly used in the United States and Saudi Arabia. This new map can better support water management and food security globally.
Sadia Bibi, Tingju Zhu, Ashraf Rateb, Bridget R. Scanlon, Muhammad Aqeel Kamran, Abdelrazek Elnashar, Ali Bennour, and Ci Li
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 1725–1750, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1725-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-1725-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We assessed 13 global models using GRACE satellite data over 29 river basins. Simulated seasonal water storage cycles showed discrepancies compared to GRACE. The models overestimated seasonal amplitude in boreal basins and showed underestimation in tropical, arid, and temperate zones, with phase differences of 2–3 months compared to GRACE in cold basins and of 1 month in temperate, arid, and semi-arid basins. Seasonal amplitude and phase differences provide insights for model improvement.
Xingli Qin, Bingfang Wu, Hongwei Zeng, Miao Zhang, and Fuyou Tian
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-346, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-346, 2023
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
We developed the first time-series gridded dataset of maize, wheat, rice and soybean production from 2010–2020. It offers detailed spatiotemporal information of crop production, allowing for advanced monitoring of agricultural productivity and for research into the factors that drive production trends across regions and over time. This dataset can help assess food security, evaluate climate impacts, and inform policies for more sustainable, resilient crop production worldwide.
Miao Zhang, Bingfang Wu, Hongwei Zeng, Guojin He, Chong Liu, Shiqi Tao, Qi Zhang, Mohsen Nabil, Fuyou Tian, José Bofana, Awetahegn Niguse Beyene, Abdelrazek Elnashar, Nana Yan, Zhengdong Wang, and Yiliang Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4799–4817, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4799-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4799-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Cropping intensity (CI) is essential for agricultural land use management, but fine-resolution global CI is not available. We used multiple satellite data on Google Earth Engine to develop a first 30 m resolution global CI (GCI30). GCI30 performed well, with an overall accuracy of 92 %. GCI30 not only exhibited high agreement with existing CI products but also provided many spatial details. GCI30 can facilitate research on sustained cropland intensification to improve food production.
Cited articles
Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A., and Hegewisch, K. C.:
TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and
climatic water balance from 1958–2015, Sci. Data, 5, 170191,
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.191, 2018.
Almusaed, A.: Evapotranspiration and Environmental Benefits, in: Biophilic
and Bioclimatic Architecture: Analytical Therapy for the Next Generation of
Passive Sustainable Architecture, edited by: Almusaed, A., Springer London,
London, 167–171, 2011.
Andam-Akorful, S. A., Ferreira, V. G., Awange, J. L., Forootan, E., and He,
X. F.: Multi-model and multi-sensor estimations of evapotranspiration over
the Volta Basin, West Africa, Int. J. Climatol., 35,
3132–3145, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4198, 2015.
Arnell, N. W.: Climate change and global water resources, Global
Environ. Change, 9, S31–S49,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(99)00017-5, 1999.
Arnell, N. W. and Lloyd-Hughes, B.: The global-scale impacts of climate
change on water resources and flooding under new climate and socio-economic
scenarios, Clim. Change, 122, 127–140,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0948-4, 2014.
Ashouri, H., Hsu, K.-L., Sorooshian, S., Braithwaite, D. K., Knapp, K. R.,
Cecil, L. D., Nelson, B. R., and Prat, O. P.: PERSIANN-CDR: Daily
Precipitation Climate Data Record from Multisatellite Observations for
Hydrological and Climate Studies, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 69–83, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-13-00068.1, 2015.
Badgley, G., Fisher, J. B., Jiménez, C., Tu, K. P., and Vinukollu, R.:
On Uncertainty in Global Terrestrial Evapotranspiration Estimates from
Choice of Input Forcing Datasets, J. Hydrometeorol., 16,
1449–1455, https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-14-0040.1, 2015.
Baldocchi, D.: Measuring fluxes of trace gases and energy between ecosystems
and the atmosphere – the state and future of the eddy covariance method,
Glob. Change Biol., 20, 3600–3609,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12649, 2014.
Bastiaanssen, W. G. M., Karimi, P., Rebelo, L.-M., Duan, Z., Senay, G.,
Muthuwatte, L., and Smakhtin, V.: Earth observation based assessment of the
water production and water consumption of Nile basin agro-ecosystems, Remote
Sens., 6, 10306–10334, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61110306,
2014.
Bhattarai, N., Mallick, K., Stuart, J., Vishwakarma, B. D., Niraula, R.,
Sen, S., and Jain, M.: An automated multi-model evapotranspiration mapping
framework using remotely sensed and reanalysis data, Remote Sens.
Environ., 229, 69–92, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.026, 2019.
Chen, X., Su, Z., Ma, Y., Yang, K., Wen, J., and Zhang, Y.: An Improvement
of Roughness Height Parameterization of the Surface Energy Balance System
(SEBS) over the Tibetan Plateau, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 52, 607–622,
https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-12-056.1, 2013.
Chen, X., Su, Z., Ma, Y., Liu, S., Yu, Q., and Xu, Z.: Development of a 10-year (2001–2010) 0.1∘ data set of land-surface energy balance for mainland China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13097–13117, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13097-2014, 2014.
Chen, X., Massman, W. J., and Su, Z.: A Column Canopy-Air Turbulent
Diffusion Method for Different Canopy Structures, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 488–506,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd028883, 2019.
Chen, Y., Xia, J., Liang, S., Feng, J., Fisher, J. B., Li, X., Li, X., Liu,
S., Ma, Z., Miyata, A., Mu, Q., Sun, L., Tang, J., Wang, K., Wen, J., Xue,
Y., Yu, G., Zha, T., Zhang, L., Zhang, Q., Zhao, T., Zhao, L., and Yuan, W.:
Comparison of satellite-based evapotranspiration models over terrestrial
ecosystems in China, Remote Sens. Environ., 140, 279–293,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.045, 2014.
Danielson, J. J. and Gesch, D. B.: Global multi-resolution terrain elevation data 2010 (GMTED2010), Open-File Report 2011–1073, US Geological Survey, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20111073, 2011.
Degefu, D. M., Weijun, H., Zaiyi, L., Liang, Y., Zhengwei, H., and Min, A.:
Mapping Monthly Water Scarcity in Global Transboundary Basins at
Country-Basin Mesh Based Spatial Resolution, Sci. Rep.-UK, 8,
2144-2144, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20032-w, 2018.
Elnashar, A., Wang, L., Wu, B., Zhu, W., and Zeng, H.: Synthesis of Global
Actual Evapotranspiration from 1982 to 2019, V1, Harvard Dataverse,
https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/ZGOUED, 2020.
Ershadi, A., McCabe, M. F., Evans, J. P., Chaney, N. W., and Wood, E. F.:
Multi-site evaluation of terrestrial evaporation models using FLUXNET data,
Agr. Forest Meteorol., 187, 46–61,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.11.008, 2014.
FAO: WaPOR Database Methodology: Level 1 Data using remote sensing in
support of solutions to reduce agricultural water productivity gaps,
Technical Report, FAO, Rome, 2018.
FAO: WaPOR V2 Database Methodology. Remote Sensing for Water Productivity
Technical Report, Methodology Series, FAO, Rome, 2020.
Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S.,
Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E., Roth, L., Seal, D., Shaffer, S.,
Shimada, J., Umland, J., Werner, M., Oskin, M., Burbank, D., and Alsdorf,
D.: The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, Rev. Geophys., 45, 2005RG000183,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005rg000183, 2007.
Ferguson, P. R. and Veizer, J.: Coupling of water and carbon fluxes via the
terrestrial biosphere and its significance to the Earth's climate system,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 2007JD008431,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008431, 2007.
Fisher, J. B., Melton, F., Middleton, E., Hain, C., Anderson, M., Allen, R.,
McCabe, M. F., Hook, S., Baldocchi, D., Townsend, P. A., Kilic, A., Tu, K.,
Miralles, D. D., Perret, J., Lagouarde, J.-P., Waliser, D., Purdy, A. J.,
French, A., Schimel, D., Famiglietti, J. S., Stephens, G., and Wood, E. F.:
The future of evapotranspiration: Global requirements for ecosystem
functioning, carbon and climate feedbacks, agricultural management, and
water resources, Water Resour. Res., 53, 2618–2626,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016wr020175, 2017.
Foken, T.: The energy balance closure problem: An overview, Ecol.
Appl., 18, 1351–1367, https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0922.1,
2008.
Foken, T., Aubinet, M., and Leuning, R.: The Eddy Covariance Method, in:
Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, edited
by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., Springer Netherlands,
Dordrecht, 1–19, 2012.
Forootan, E., Khaki, M., Schumacher, M., Wulfmeyer, V., Mehrnegar, N., van
Dijk, A. I. J. M., Brocca, L., Farzaneh, S., Akinluyi, F., Ramillien, G.,
Shum, C. K., Awange, J., and Mostafaie, A.: Understanding the global
hydrological droughts of 2003–2016 and their relationships with
teleconnections, Sci. Total Environ., 650, 2587–2604,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.231, 2019.
Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S.,
Husak, G., Rowland, J., Harrison, L., and Hoell, A.: The climate hazards
infrared precipitation with stations-a new environmental record for
monitoring extremes, Sci. Data, 2, 150066,
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66, 2015.
Gentine, P., Green, J. K., Guérin, M., Humphrey, V., Seneviratne, S. I.,
Zhang, Y., and Zhou, S.: Coupling between the terrestrial carbon and water
cycles-a review, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 083003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab22d6, 2019.
Ghilain, N., Arboleda, A., and Gellens-Meulenberghs, F.: Evapotranspiration modelling at large scale using near-real time MSG SEVIRI derived data, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 771–786, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-771-2011, 2011.
Haddeland, I., Heinke, J., Biemans, H., Eisner, S., Flörke, M.,
Hanasaki, N., Konzmann, M., Ludwig, F., Masaki, Y., Schewe, J., Stacke, T.,
Tessler, Z. D., Wada, Y., and Wisser, D.: Global water resources affected by
human interventions and climate change, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 3251, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222475110, 2014.
Helgason, W. and Pomeroy, J.: Problems Closing the Energy Balance over a
Homogeneous Snow Cover during Midwinter, J. Hydrometeorol., 13,
557–572, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-0135.1, 2012.
Henderson-Sellers, B.: A new formula for latent heat of vaporization of
water as a function of temperature, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 110, 1186–1190,
https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711046626, 1984.
Hofste, R. W.: Comparative analysis among near-operational
evapotranspiration products for the Nile basin based on earth observations
first steps towards an ensemble product, MSc Thes, Delft University of
Technology, the Netherlands, 2014.
Hu, G., Jia, L., and Menenti, M.: Comparison of MOD16 and LSA-SAF MSG
evapotranspiration products over Europe for 2011, Remote Sens.
Environ., 156, 510–526,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.017, 2015.
Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Arkin, P., Chang, A., Ferraro, R., Gruber, A.,
Janowiak, J., McNab, A., Rudolf, B., and Schneider, U.: The Global
Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset,
B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 78, 5–20,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1997)078<0005:TGPCPG>2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Jia, Z., Liu, S., Xu, Z., Chen, Y., and Zhu, M.: Validation of remotely
sensed evapotranspiration over the Hai River Basin, China, J.
Geophys. Res., 17, 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017037, 2012.
Jiménez, C., Prigent, C., and Aires, F.: Toward an estimation of global
land surface heat fluxes from multisatellite observations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 2008JD011392,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011392, 2009.
Kim, H. W., Hwang, K., Mu, Q., Lee, S. O., and Choi, M.: Validation of MODIS
16 global terrestrial evapotranspiration products in various climates and
land cover types in Asia, J. Civ. Eng., 16, 229–238,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-0006-1, 2012.
Leuning, R., Zhang, Y. Q., Rajaud, A., Cleugh, H., and Tu, K.: A simple
surface conductance model to estimate regional evaporation using MODIS leaf
area index and the Penman-Monteith equation, Water Resour. Res., 44, 2007WR006562,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006562, 2008.
Li, S., Wang, G., Sun, S., Chen, H., Bai, P., Zhou, S., Huang, Y., Wang, J.,
and Deng, P.: Assessment of Multi-Source Evapotranspiration Products over
China Using Eddy Covariance Observations, Remote Sens., 10, 1692,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10111692, 2018.
Liu, S. M., Xu, Z. W., Zhu, Z. L., Jia, Z. Z., and Zhu, M. J.: Measurements
of evapotranspiration from eddy-covariance systems and large aperture
scintillometers in the Hai River Basin, China, J. Hydrol., 487,
24–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.02.025, 2013.
Lu, Y., Cai, H., Jiang, T., Sun, S., Wang, Y., Zhao, J., Yu, X., and Sun,
J.: Assessment of global drought propensity and its impacts on agricultural
water use in future climate scenarios, Agr. Forest Meteorol.,
278, 107623, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107623,
2019.
Ma, N., Szilagyi, J., Zhang, Y., and Liu, W.:
Complementary-Relationship-Based Modeling of Terrestrial Evapotranspiration
Across China During 1982–2012: Validations and Spatiotemporal Analyses,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 4326–4351,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029850, 2019.
Majozi, N., Mannaerts, C., Ramoelo, A., Mathieu, R., Mudau, A., and Verhoef,
W.: An intercomparison of satellite-based daily evapotranspiration estimates
under different eco-climatic regions in South Africa, Remote Sens., 9,
307, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9040307, 2017.
Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Lievens, H., van der Schalie, R., de Jeu, R. A. M., Fernández-Prieto, D., Beck, H. E., Dorigo, W. A., and Verhoest, N. E. C.: GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 1903–1925, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017, 2017.
McCabe, M. F., Ershadi, A., Jimenez, C., Miralles, D. G., Michel, D., and Wood, E. F.: The GEWEX LandFlux project: evaluation of model evaporation using tower-based and globally gridded forcing data, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 283–305, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-283-2016, 2016.
McNally, A., Arsenault, K., Kumar, S., Shukla, S., Peterson, P., Wang, S.,
Funk, C., Peters-Lidard, C. D., and Verdin, J. P.: A land data assimilation
system for sub-Saharan Africa food and water security applications,
Sci. Data, 4, 170012,
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.12, 2017.
Michel, D., Jiménez, C., Miralles, D. G., Jung, M., Hirschi, M., Ershadi, A., Martens, B., McCabe, M. F., Fisher, J. B., Mu, Q., Seneviratne, S. I., Wood, E. F., and Fernández-Prieto, D.: The WACMOS-ET project – Part 1: Tower-scale evaluation of four remote-sensing-based evapotranspiration algorithms, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 803–822, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-803-2016, 2016.
Miralles, D. G., De Jeu, R. A. M., Gash, J. H., Holmes, T. R. H., and Dolman, A. J.: Magnitude and variability of land evaporation and its components at the global scale, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 967–981, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-967-2011, 2011a.
Miralles, D. G., Holmes, T. R. H., De Jeu, R. A. M., Gash, J. H., Meesters, A. G. C. A., and Dolman, A. J.: Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 453–469, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-453-2011, 2011b.
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Running, S. W.: Improvements to a MODIS global
terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm, Remote Sens. Environ.,
115, 1781–1800, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019,
2011.
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., Steven, W., and Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group: MODIS Global Terrestrial Evapotranspiration (ET) Product (NASA MOD16A2/A3) Collection 5, available at: https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/MODIS_NTSG_MOD16A2_105 (last access: 21 January 2021), 2014a.
Mu, Q., Zhao, M., and Steven, W.: MODIS Global Terrestrial Evapotranspiration (ET) Product (NASA MOD16A2/A3) Collection 5, NASA Headquarters, Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group Publications, 268, available at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/ntsg_pubs/268 (last access: 21 January 2021), 2014b.
Mueller, B., Hirschi, M., Jimenez, C., Ciais, P., Dirmeyer, P. A., Dolman, A. J., Fisher, J. B., Jung, M., Ludwig, F., Maignan, F., Miralles, D. G., McCabe, M. F., Reichstein, M., Sheffield, J., Wang, K., Wood, E. F., Zhang, Y., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Benchmark products for land evapotranspiration: LandFlux-EVAL multi-data set synthesis, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 3707–3720, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3707-2013, 2013.
Munia, H., Guillaume, J. H. A., Mirumachi, N., Porkka, M., Wada, Y., and
Kummu, M.: Water stress in global transboundary river basins: significance
of upstream water use on downstream stress, Environ. Res. Lett.,
11, 014002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/1/014002,
2016.
Naumann, G., Alfieri, L., Wyser, K., Mentaschi, L., Betts, R. A., Carrao,
H., Spinoni, J., Vogt, J., and Feyen, L.: Global Changes in Drought
Conditions Under Different Levels of Warming, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
45, 3285–3296, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076521, 2018.
Oki, T. and Kanae, S.: Global hydrological cycles and world water
resources, Science, 313, 1068–1072, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128845, 2006.
Pan, S., Tian, H., Dangal, S. R. S., Yang, Q., Yang, J., Lu, C., Tao, B.,
Ren, W., and Ouyang, Z.: Responses of global terrestrial evapotranspiration
to climate change and increasing atmospheric CO2 in the 21st century,
Earths Future, 3, 15–35, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014ef000263,
2015.
Reichstein, M., Falge, E., Baldocchi, D., Papale, D., Aubinet, M.,
Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Buchmann, N., Gilmanov, T., Granier, A.,
Grünwald, T., Havránková, K., Ilvesniemi, H., Janous, D., Knohl,
A., Laurila, T., Lohila, A., Loustau, D., Matteucci, G., Meyers, T.,
Miglietta, F., Ourcival, J.-M., Pumpanen, J., Rambal, S., Rotenberg, E.,
Sanz, M., Tenhunen, J., Seufert, G., Vaccari, F., Vesala, T., Yakir, D., and
Valentini, R.: On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation
and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm, Glob. Change
Biol., 11, 1424–1439, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x, 2005.
Revelli, R. and Porporato, A.: Ecohydrological model for the quantification
of ecosystem services provided by urban street trees, Urban Ecosyst., 21,
489–504, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0741-2, 2018.
Rodell, M., Houser, P. R., Jambor, U., Gottschalck, J., Mitchell, K., Meng,
C.-J., Arsenault, K., Cosgrove, B., Radakovich, J., Bosilovich, M., Entin,
J. K., Walker, J. P., Lohmann, D., and Toll, D.: The Global Land Data
Assimilation System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 85,
381–394, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-85-3-381, 2004.
Rodell, M., Beaudoing, H. K., L'Ecuyer, T. S., Olson, W. S., Famiglietti, J.
S., Houser, P. R., Adler, R., Bosilovich, M. G., Clayson, C. A., Chambers,
D., Clark, E., Fetzer, E. J., Gao, X., Gu, G., Hilburn, K., Huffman, G. J.,
Lettenmaier, D. P., Liu, W. T., Robertson, F. R., Schlosser, C. A.,
Sheffield, J., and Wood, E. F.: The Observed State of the Water Cycle in the
Early Twenty-First Century, J. Climate, 28, 8289–8318,
https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00555.1, 2015.
Samaranayake, N., Limaye, S., and Wuthnow, J.: Water resource competition in the Brahmaputra river basin: China, India, and Bangladesh, CNA, Washington, D.C., available at: https://www.cna.org/cna_files/pdf/cna-brahmaputra-study-2016.pdf (last access: 21 January 2021), 2016.
Savoca, M. E., Senay, G. B., Maupin, M. A., Kenny, J. F., and Perry, C. A.:
Actual evapotranspiration modeling using the operational Simplified Surface
Energy Balance (SSEBop) approach, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific
Investigations Report 2013-126, 16 p, 2013.
Schaffrath, D. and Bernhofer, C.: Variability and distribution of spatial
evapotranspiration in semi arid Inner Mongolian grasslands from 2002 to
2011, SpringerPlus, 2, 547, https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-547, 2013.
Scheff, J. and Frierson, D. M. W.: Scaling Potential Evapotranspiration
with Greenhouse Warming, J. Climate, 27, 1539–1558,
https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-13-00233.1, 2014.
Scott, C. A., Silva-Ochoa, P., Florencio-Cruz, V., and Wester, P.:
Competition for Water in the Lerma-Chapala Basin, in: The Lerma-Chapala
Watershed: Evaluation and Management, edited by: Hansen, A. M. and van
Afferden, M., Springer US, Boston, MA, 291–323, 2001.
Senay, G., Budde, M., Verdin, J., and Melesse, A.: A coupled remote sensing
and simplified surface energy balance approach to estimate actual
evapotranspiration from irrigated fields, Sensors, 7, 979–1000, https://doi.org/10.3390/s7060979, 2007.
Senay, G. B. and Kagone, S.: Daily SSEBop Evapotranspiration: U. S.
Geological Survey Data Release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P9L2YMV, 2019.
Senay, G. B., Budde, M. E., and Verdin, J. P.: Enhancing the Simplified
Surface Energy Balance (SSEB) approach for estimating landscape ET:
Validation with the METRIC model, Agr. Water Manage., 98,
606–618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.014, 2011.
Senay, G. B., Bohms, S., and Verdin, J. P.: Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration for Operational Drought Monitoring Using Principles of Water and Energy Balance. USGS Staff – Published Research, 979, available at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/979 (last access: 21 January 2021), 2012.
Senay, G. B., Bohms, S., Singh, R. K., Gowda, P. H., Velpuri, N. M., Alemu,
H., and Verdin, J. P.: Operational evapotranspiration mapping using remote
sensing and weather datasets: A new parameterization for the SSEB approach,
J. Am. Water Resour. As., 49, 577–591,
https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12057, 2013.
Senay, G. B., Kagone, S., and Velpuri, N. M.: Operational Global Actual
Evapotranspiration: Development, Evaluation, and Dissemination, Sensors, 20,
1915, https://doi.org/10.3390/s20071915, 2020.
Sheffield, J., Wood, E. F., and Roderick, M. L.: Little change in global
drought over the past 60 years, Nature, 491, 435–438,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11575, 2012.
Sörensson, A. A. and Ruscica, R. C.: Intercomparison and Uncertainty
Assessment of Nine Evapotranspiration Estimates Over South America, Water
Resour. Res., 54, 2891–2908, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr021682, 2018.
Spinoni, J., Barbosa, P., De Jager, A., McCormick, N., Naumann, G., Vogt, J.
V., Magni, D., Masante, D., and Mazzeschi, M.: A new global database of
meteorological drought events from 1951 to 2016, J. Hydrol., 22, 100593, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100593, 2019.
Su, Z.: The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 85–100, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-6-85-2002, 2002.
Tang, R., Shao, K., Li, Z.-L., Wu, H., Tang, B.-H., Zhou, G., and Zhang, L.:
Multiscale validation of the 8-day MOD16 evapotranspiration product using
flux data collected in China, Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth
Observations and Remote Sensing, 8, 1478–1486, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2420105, 2015.
Taylor, K. E.: Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single
diagram, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 7183–7192,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719, 2001.
Trabucco, A. and Zomer, R.: Global Aridity Index and Potential Evapotranspiration (ET0) Climate Database v2, figshare, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7504448.v1, 2018.
Trambauer, P., Dutra, E., Maskey, S., Werner, M., Pappenberger, F., van Beek, L. P. H., and Uhlenbrook, S.: Comparison of different evaporation estimates over the African continent, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 193–212, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-193-2014, 2014.
Trenberth, K. E., Smith, L., Qian, T., Dai, A., and Fasullo, J.: Estimates
of the Global Water Budget and Its Annual Cycle Using Observational and
Model Data, J. Hydrometeorol., 8, 758–769,
https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm600.1, 2007.
UNEP: World atlas of desertification, United Nations Environment Programme,
1997.
Velpuri, N. M., Senay, G. B., Singh, R. K., Bohms, S., and Verdin, J. P.: A
comprehensive evaluation of two MODIS evapotranspiration products over the
conterminous United States: Using point and gridded FLUXNET and water
balance ET, Remote Sens. Environ., 139, 35–49, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.013, 2013.
Vinukollu, R. K., Meynadier, R., Sheffield, J., and Wood, E. F.:
Multi-model, multi-sensor estimates of global evapotranspiration:
climatology, uncertainties and trends, Hydrol. Process., 25,
3993–4010, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8393, 2011a.
Vinukollu, R. K., Wood, E. F., Ferguson, C. R., and Fisher, J. B.: Global
estimates of evapotranspiration for climate studies using multi-sensor
remote sensing data: Evaluation of three process-based approaches, Remote
Sens. Environ., 115, 801–823,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.11.006, 2011b.
Walter, I. A., Allen, R. G., Elliott, R., Jensen, M. E., Itenfisu, D.,
Mecham, B., Howell, T. A., Snyder, R., Brown, P., Echings, S., Spofford, T.,
Hattendorf, M., Cuenca, R. H., Wright, J. L., and Martin, D.: ASCE's
Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation, Watershed Management
and Operations Management, 2000, 1–11, 2001.
Wang, K. and Dickinson, R. E.: A review of global terrestrial
evapotranspiration: Observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic
variability, Rev. Geophys., 50, 2011RG000373,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011rg000373, 2012.
Waring, R. H. and Running, S. W.: CHAPTER 10 – Advances in Eddy-Flux
Analyses, Remote Sensing, and Evidence of Climate Change, in: Forest
Ecosystems, Third Edition, edited by: Waring, R. H. and Running, S. W.,
Academic Press, San Diego, 317–344, 2007a.
Waring, R. H. and Running, S. W.: Chapter 2 – Water Cycle, in: Forest
Ecosystems, Third Edition, edited by: Waring, R. H. and Running, S. W.,
Academic Press, San Diego, 19–57, 2007b.
Weerasinghe, I., Bastiaanssen, W., Mul, M., Jia, L., and van Griensven, A.: Can we trust remote sensing evapotranspiration products over Africa?, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 1565–1586, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-1565-2020, 2020.
Wu, B., Tian, F., Zhang, M., Zeng, H., and Zeng, Y.: Cloud services with big
data provide a solution for monitoring and tracking sustainable development
goals, Geogr. Sust., 1, 25-32,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.03.006, 2020.
Xu, T., Guo, Z., Xia, Y., Ferreira, V. G., Liu, S., Wang, K., Yao, Y.,
Zhang, X., and Zhao, C.: Evaluation of twelve evapotranspiration products
from machine learning, remote sensing and land surface models over
conterminous United States, J. Hydrol., 578, 124105,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124105, 2019.
Yamamoto, M. K. and Shige, S.: Implementation of an
orographic/nonorographic rainfall classification scheme in the GSMaP
algorithm for microwave radiometers, Atmos. Res., 163, 36–47,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.024, 2015.
Yang, H., Luo, P., Wang, J., Mou, C., Mo, L., Wang, Z., Fu, Y., Lin, H.,
Yang, Y., and Bhatta, L. D.: Ecosystem Evapotranspiration as a Response to
Climate and Vegetation Coverage Changes in Northwest Yunnan, China, Plos One, 10, e0134795,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134795, 2015.
Yang, X., Yong, B., Ren, L., Zhang, Y., and Long, D.: Multi-scale validation
of GLEAM evapotranspiration products over China via ChinaFLUX ET
measurements, Int. J. Remote Sens., 38, 5688–5709,
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1346400, 2017.
Yang, Z., Zhang, Q., and Hao, X.: Evapotranspiration Trend and Its Relationship with Precipitation over the Loess Plateau during the Last Three Decades, Adv. Meteorol., 2016, 6809749, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6809749, 2016.
Zhang, K., Kimball, J. S., Mu, Q., Jones, L. A., Goetz, S. J., and Running,
S. W.: Satellite based analysis of northern ET trends and associated changes
in the regional water balance from 1983 to 2005, J. Hydrol., 379,
92–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.09.047, 2009.
Zhang, K., Kimball, J. S., Nemani, R. R., and Running, S. W.: A continuous
satellite-derived global record of land surface evapotranspiration from 1983
to 2006, Water Resour. Res., 46, 2009WR008800,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009wr008800, 2010.
Zhang, K., Kimball, J. S., and Running, S. W.: A review of remote sensing
based actual evapotranspiration estimation, WIRES
Water, 3, 834–853, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1168, 2016.
Zhang, Y., Kong, D., Gan, R., Chiew, F. H. S., McVicar, T. R., Zhang, Q.,
and Yang, Y.: Coupled estimation of 500 m and 8-day resolution global
evapotranspiration and gross primary production in 2002–2017, Remote
Sens. Environ., 222, 165–182,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.031, 2019.
Zhong, Y., Zhong, M., Mao, Y., and Ji, B.: Evaluation of Evapotranspiration
for Exorheic Catchments of China during the GRACE Era: From a Water Balance
Perspective, Remote Sens., 12, 511,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030511, 2020.
Zomer, R. J., Trabucco, A., Bossio, D. A., and Verchot, L. V.: Climate
change mitigation: A spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean
development mechanism afforestation and reforestation, Agr.
Ecosys. Environ., 126, 67–80,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2008.01.014, 2008.
Short summary
Based on a site-pixel validation and comparison of different global evapotranspiration (ET) products, this paper aims to produce a synthesized ET which has a minimum level of uncertainty over as many conditions as possible from 1982 to 2019. Through a high-quality flux eddy covariance (EC) covering the globe, PML, SSEBop, MOD16A2105, and NTSG ET products were chosen to create the new dataset. It agreed well with flux EC ET and can be used without other datasets or further assessments.
Based on a site-pixel validation and comparison of different global evapotranspiration (ET)...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint