Articles | Volume 15, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3963-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3963-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description paper
| 
06 Sep 2023
Data description paper |
| 06 Sep 2023
| 06 Sep 2023
CLIM4OMICS: a geospatially comprehensive climate and multi-OMICS database for maize phenotype predictability in the United States and Canada
Parisa Sarzaeim
Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of
Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0726, USA
Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of
Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0726, USA
School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0996, USA
Diego Jarquin
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611,
USA
Hasnat Aslam
School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583-0996, USA
Natalia De Leon Gatti
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
Related authors
No articles found.
Vishal Singh, Manish Kumar Goyal, Rao Y. Surampalli, and Francisco Munoz-Arriola
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-689, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2016-689, 2017
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Glacier presence in the Satluj River influence temporal changes in streamflow generation and the distribution of accumulated snow illustrate how snowmelt and precipitation can define water supplies for more than 1.3 billion People. The objective is to assess the role of elevations in the computation of snowfall (snowpack) and snowmelt at sub-catchment scale. Elevation bands and parameter-sensitivity analyses were built in the SWAT model to assess historical and predicted hydrological scenarios.
William Alexander Avery, Catherine Finkenbiner, Trenton E. Franz, Tiejun Wang, Anthony L. Nguy-Robertson, Andrew Suyker, Timothy Arkebauer, and Francisco Muñoz-Arriola
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3859–3872, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3859-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3859-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Here we present a strategy to use globally available datasets in the calibration function used to convert observed moderated neutron counts into volumetric soil water content. While local sampling protocols are well documented for fixed probes, the use of roving probes presents new calibration challenges. With over 200 fixed probes and 10 roving probes in use globally, we anticipate this paper will serve as a keystone for the growing cosmic-ray neutron probe and hydrologic community.
Related subject area
Domain: ESSD – Land | Subject: Biogeosciences and biodiversity
Spatiotemporally consistent global dataset of the GIMMS Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (PKU GIMMS NDVI) from 1982 to 2022
Quantifying exchangeable base cations in permafrost: a reserve of nutrients about to thaw
Routine monitoring of western Lake Erie to track water quality changes associated with cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms
The Portuguese Large Wildfire Spread database (PT-FireSprd)
Thirty-meter map of young forest age in China
GRiMeDB: the Global River Methane Database of concentrations and fluxes
A gridded dataset of a leaf-age-dependent leaf area index seasonality product over tropical and subtropical evergreen broadleaved forests
Fire weather index data under historical and shared socioeconomic pathway projections in the 6th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project from 1850 to 2100
A remote-sensing-based dataset to characterize the ecosystem functioning and functional diversity in the Biosphere Reserve of the Sierra Nevada (southeastern Spain)
A global long-term, high-resolution satellite radar backscatter data record (1992–2022+): merging C-band ERS/ASCAT and Ku-band QSCAT
A global database on holdover time of lightning-ignited wildfires
National CO2 budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2 observations in support of the global stocktake
Spatiotemporally consistent global dataset of the GIMMS Leaf Area Index (GIMMS LAI4g) from 1982 to 2020
Mammals in the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone's Red Forest: a motion-activated camera trap study
Maps with 1 km resolution reveal increases in above- and belowground forest biomass carbon pools in China over the past 20 years
AnisoVeg: anisotropy and nadir-normalized MODIS multi-angle implementation atmospheric correction (MAIAC) datasets for satellite vegetation studies in South America
TiP-Leaf: a dataset of leaf traits across vegetation types on the Tibetan Plateau
Forest structure and individual tree inventories of northeastern Siberia along climatic gradients
Global climate-related predictors at kilometer resolution for the past and future
A daily and 500 m coupled evapotranspiration and gross primary production product across China during 2000–2020
Global land surface 250 m 8 d fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) product from 2000 to 2021
Rates and timing of chlorophyll-a increases and related environmental variables in global temperate and cold-temperate lakes
Harmonized gap-filled datasets from 20 urban flux tower sites
Holocene spatiotemporal millet agricultural patterns in northern China: a dataset of archaeobotanical macroremains
The biogeography of relative abundance of soil fungi versus bacteria in surface topsoil
Airborne SnowSAR data at X and Ku bands over boreal forest, alpine and tundra snow cover
The Landscape Fire Scars Database: mapping historical burned area and fire severity in Chile
Aridec: an open database of litter mass loss from aridlands worldwide with recommendations on suitable model applications
LegacyPollen 1.0: a taxonomically harmonized global late Quaternary pollen dataset of 2831 records with standardized chronologies
Muyi Li, Sen Cao, Zaichun Zhu, Zhe Wang, Ranga B. Myneni, and Shilong Piao
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4181–4203, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4181-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4181-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Long-term global Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) products support the understanding of changes in vegetation under environmental changes. This study generates a consistent global NDVI product (PKU GIMMS NDVI) from 1982–2022 that eliminates the issue of orbital drift and sensor degradation in Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data. More accurate than its predecessor (GIMMS NDVI3g), it shows high temporal consistency with MODIS NDVI in describing vegetation trends.
Elisabeth Mauclet, Maëlle Villani, Arthur Monhonval, Catherine Hirst, Edward A. G. Schuur, and Sophie Opfergelt
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3891–3904, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3891-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3891-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Permafrost ecosystems are limited in nutrients for vegetation development and constrain the biological activity to the active layer. Upon Arctic warming, permafrost degradation exposes organic and mineral soil material that may directly influence the capacity of the soil to retain key nutrients for vegetation growth and development. Here, we demonstrate that the average total exchangeable nutrient density (Ca, K, Mg, and Na) is more than 2 times higher in the permafrost than in the active layer.
Anna G. Boegehold, Ashley M. Burtner, Andrew C. Camilleri, Glenn Carter, Paul DenUyl, David Fanslow, Deanna Fyffe Semenyuk, Casey M. Godwin, Duane Gossiaux, Thomas H. Johengen, Holly Kelchner, Christine Kitchens, Lacey A. Mason, Kelly McCabe, Danna Palladino, Dack Stuart, Henry Vanderploeg, and Reagan Errera
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3853–3868, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3853-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3853-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Western Lake Erie suffers from cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (HABs) despite decades of international management efforts. In response, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (GLERL) and the Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research (CIGLR) created an annual sampling program to detect, monitor, assess, and predict HABs. Here we describe the data collected from this monitoring program from 2012 to 2021.
Akli Benali, Nuno Guiomar, Hugo Gonçalves, Bernardo Mota, Fábio Silva, Paulo M. Fernandes, Carlos Mota, Alexandre Penha, João Santos, José M. C. Pereira, and Ana C. L. Sá
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3791–3818, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3791-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3791-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We reconstructed the spread of 80 large wildfires that burned recently in Portugal and calculated metrics that describe how wildfires behave, such as rate of spread, growth rate, and energy released. We describe the fire behaviour distribution using six percentile intervals that can be easily communicated to both research and management communities. The database will help improve our current knowledge on wildfire behaviour and support better decision making.
Yuelong Xiao, Qunming Wang, Xiaohua Tong, and Peter M. Atkinson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3365–3386, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3365-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3365-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Forest age is closely related to forest production, carbon cycles, and other ecosystem services. Existing stand age products in China derived from remote-sensing images are of a coarse spatial resolution and are not suitable for applications at the regional scale. Here, we mapped young forest ages across China at an unprecedented fine spatial resolution of 30 m. The overall accuracy (OA) of the generated map of young forest stand ages across China was 90.28 %.
Emily H. Stanley, Luke C. Loken, Nora J. Casson, Samantha K. Oliver, Ryan A. Sponseller, Marcus B. Wallin, Liwei Zhang, and Gerard Rocher-Ros
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2879–2926, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2879-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2879-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Global River Methane Database (GRiMeDB) presents CH4 concentrations and fluxes for flowing waters and concurrent measures of CO2, N2O, and several physicochemical variables, plus information about sample locations and methods used to measure gas fluxes. GRiMeDB is intended to increase opportunities to understand variation in fluvial CH4, test hypotheses related to greenhouse gas dynamics, and reduce uncertainty in future estimates of gas emissions from world streams and rivers.
Xueqin Yang, Xiuzhi Chen, Jiashun Ren, Wenping Yuan, Liyang Liu, Juxiu Liu, Dexiang Chen, Yihua Xiao, Qinghai Song, Yanjun Du, Shengbiao Wu, Lei Fan, Xiaoai Dai, Yunpeng Wang, and Yongxian Su
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2601–2622, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2601-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2601-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We developed the first time-mapped, continental-scale gridded dataset of monthly leaf area index (LAI) in three leaf age cohorts (i.e., young, mature, and old) from 2001–2018 data (referred to as Lad-LAI). The seasonality of three LAI cohorts from the new Lad-LAI product agrees well at eight sites with very fine-scale collections of monthly LAI. The proposed satellite-based approaches can provide references for mapping finer spatiotemporal-resolution LAI products with different leaf age cohorts.
Yann Quilcaille, Fulden Batibeniz, Andreia F. S. Ribeiro, Ryan S. Padrón, and Sonia I. Seneviratne
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2153–2177, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2153-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2153-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new database of four annual fire weather indicators over 1850–2100 and over all land areas. In a 3°C warmer world with respect to preindustrial times, the mean fire weather would increase on average by at least 66% in both intensity and duration and even triple for 1-in-10-year events. The dataset is a freely available resource for fire danger studies and beyond, highlighting that the best course of action would require limiting global warming as much as possible.
Beatriz P. Cazorla, Javier Cabello, Andrés Reyes, Emilio Guirado, Julio Peñas, Antonio J. Pérez-Luque, and Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1871–1887, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1871-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1871-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This dataset provides scientists, environmental managers, and the public in general with valuable information on the first characterization of ecosystem functional diversity based on primary production developed in the Sierra Nevada (Spain), a biodiversity hotspot in the Mediterranean basin and an exceptional natural laboratory for ecological research within the Long-Term Social-Ecological Research (LTSER) network.
Shengli Tao, Zurui Ao, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Sassan Saatchi, Philippe Ciais, Jérôme Chave, Thuy Le Toan, Pierre-Louis Frison, Xiaomei Hu, Chi Chen, Lei Fan, Mengjia Wang, Jiangling Zhu, Xia Zhao, Xiaojun Li, Xiangzhuo Liu, Yanjun Su, Tianyu Hu, Qinghua Guo, Zhiheng Wang, Zhiyao Tang, Yi Y. Liu, and Jingyun Fang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1577–1596, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1577-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1577-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We provide the first long-term (since 1992), high-resolution (8.9 km) satellite radar backscatter data set (LHScat) with a C-band (5.3 GHz) signal dynamic for global lands. LHScat was created by fusing signals from ERS (1992–2001; C-band), QSCAT (1999–2009; Ku-band), and ASCAT (since 2007; C-band). LHScat has been validated against independent ERS-2 signals. It could be used in a variety of studies, such as vegetation monitoring and hydrological modelling.
Jose V. Moris, Pedro Álvarez-Álvarez, Marco Conedera, Annalie Dorph, Thomas D. Hessilt, Hugh G. P. Hunt, Renata Libonati, Lucas S. Menezes, Mortimer M. Müller, Francisco J. Pérez-Invernón, Gianni B. Pezzatti, Nicolau Pineda, Rebecca C. Scholten, Sander Veraverbeke, B. Mike Wotton, and Davide Ascoli
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1151–1163, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1151-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1151-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work describes a database on holdover times of lightning-ignited wildfires (LIWs). Holdover time is defined as the time between lightning-induced fire ignition and fire detection. The database contains 42 datasets built with data on more than 152 375 LIWs from 13 countries in five continents from 1921 to 2020. This database is the first freely-available, harmonized and ready-to-use global source of holdover time data, which may be used to investigate LIWs and model the holdover phenomenon.
Brendan Byrne, David F. Baker, Sourish Basu, Michael Bertolacci, Kevin W. Bowman, Dustin Carroll, Abhishek Chatterjee, Frédéric Chevallier, Philippe Ciais, Noel Cressie, David Crisp, Sean Crowell, Feng Deng, Zhu Deng, Nicholas M. Deutscher, Manvendra K. Dubey, Sha Feng, Omaira E. García, David W. T. Griffith, Benedikt Herkommer, Lei Hu, Andrew R. Jacobson, Rajesh Janardanan, Sujong Jeong, Matthew S. Johnson, Dylan B. A. Jones, Rigel Kivi, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Shamil Maksyutov, John B. Miller, Scot M. Miller, Isamu Morino, Justus Notholt, Tomohiro Oda, Christopher W. O'Dell, Young-Suk Oh, Hirofumi Ohyama, Prabir K. Patra, Hélène Peiro, Christof Petri, Sajeev Philip, David F. Pollard, Benjamin Poulter, Marine Remaud, Andrew Schuh, Mahesh K. Sha, Kei Shiomi, Kimberly Strong, Colm Sweeney, Yao Té, Hanqin Tian, Voltaire A. Velazco, Mihalis Vrekoussis, Thorsten Warneke, John R. Worden, Debra Wunch, Yuanzhi Yao, Jeongmin Yun, Andrew Zammit-Mangion, and Ning Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 963–1004, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-963-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-963-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Changes in the carbon stocks of terrestrial ecosystems result in emissions and removals of CO2. These can be driven by anthropogenic activities (e.g., deforestation), natural processes (e.g., fires) or in response to rising CO2 (e.g., CO2 fertilization). This paper describes a dataset of CO2 emissions and removals derived from atmospheric CO2 observations. This pilot dataset informs current capabilities and future developments towards top-down monitoring and verification systems.
Sen Cao, Muyi Li, Zaichun Zhu, Junjun Zha, Weiqing Zhao, Zeyu Duanmu, Jiana Chen, Yaoyao Zheng, and Yue Chen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-68, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-68, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The long-term global LAI products are critical supports to characterize vegetation dynamics under environmental changes. This study presents an updated GIMMS LAI product (GIMMS LAI4g; 1982−2020) based on PKU GIMMS NDVI and massive Landsat LAI samples. With higher accuracy than other LAI products, GIMMS LAI4g removes the effects of orbital drift and sensor degradation in AVHRR data. It also presents a better temporal consistency before and after 2000 and a more reasonable global vegetation trend.
Nicholas A. Beresford, Sergii Gashchak, Michael D. Wood, and Catherine L. Barnett
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 911–920, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-911-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-911-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Camera traps were established in a highly contaminated area of the Chornobyl Exclusion Zone (CEZ) to capture images of mammals. Over 1 year, 14 mammal species were recorded. The number of species observed did not vary with estimated radiation exposure. The data will be of value from the perspectives of effects of radiation on wildlife and also rewilding in this large, abandoned area. They may also have value in future studies investigating impacts of recent Russian military action in the CEZ.
Yongzhe Chen, Xiaoming Feng, Bojie Fu, Haozhi Ma, Constantin M. Zohner, Thomas W. Crowther, Yuanyuan Huang, Xutong Wu, and Fangli Wei
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 897–910, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-897-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-897-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study presented a long-term (2002–2021) above- and belowground biomass dataset for woody vegetation in China at 1 km resolution. It was produced by combining various types of remote sensing observations with adequate plot measurements. Over 2002–2021, China’s woody biomass increased at a high rate, especially in the central and southern parts. This dataset can be applied to evaluate forest carbon sinks across China and the efficiency of ecological restoration programs in China.
Ricardo Dalagnol, Lênio Soares Galvão, Fabien Hubert Wagner, Yhasmin Mendes de Moura, Nathan Gonçalves, Yujie Wang, Alexei Lyapustin, Yan Yang, Sassan Saatchi, and Luiz Eduardo Oliveira Cruz Aragão
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 345–358, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-345-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-345-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The AnisoVeg dataset brings 22 years of monthly satellite data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor for South America at 1 km resolution aimed at vegetation applications. It has nadir-normalized data, which is the most traditional approach to correct satellite data but also unique anisotropy data with strong biophysical meaning, explaining 55 % of Amazon forest height. We expect this dataset to help large-scale estimates of vegetation biomass and carbon.
Yili Jin, Haoyan Wang, Jie Xia, Jian Ni, Kai Li, Ying Hou, Jing Hu, Linfeng Wei, Kai Wu, Haojun Xia, and Borui Zhou
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 25–39, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-25-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-25-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The TiP-Leaf dataset was compiled from direct field measurements and included 11 leaf traits from 468 species of 1692 individuals, covering a great proportion of species and vegetation types on the highest plateau in the world. This work is the first plant trait dataset that represents all of the alpine vegetation on the TP, which is not only an update of the Chinese plant trait database, but also a great contribution to the global trait database.
Timon Miesner, Ulrike Herzschuh, Luidmila A. Pestryakova, Mareike Wieczorek, Evgenii S. Zakharov, Alexei I. Kolmogorov, Paraskovya V. Davydova, and Stefan Kruse
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5695–5716, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5695-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5695-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present data which were collected on expeditions to the northeast of the Russian Federation. One table describes the 226 locations we visited during those expeditions, and the other describes 40 289 trees which we recorded at these locations. We found out that important information on the forest cannot be predicted precisely from satellites. Thus, for anyone interested in distant forests, it is important to go to there and take measurements or use data (as presented here).
Philipp Brun, Niklaus E. Zimmermann, Chantal Hari, Loïc Pellissier, and Dirk Nikolaus Karger
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5573–5603, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5573-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5573-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Using mechanistic downscaling, we developed CHELSA-BIOCLIM+, a set of 15 biologically relevant, climate-related variables at unprecedented resolution, as a basis for environmental analyses. It includes monthly time series for 38+ years and 30-year averages for three future periods and three emission scenarios. Estimates matched well with station measurements, but few biases existed. The data allow for detailed assessments of climate-change impact on ecosystems and their services to societies.
Shaoyang He, Yongqiang Zhang, Ning Ma, Jing Tian, Dongdong Kong, and Changming Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5463–5488, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5463-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5463-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study developed a daily, 500 m evapotranspiration and gross primary production product (PML-V2(China)) using a locally calibrated water–carbon coupled model, PML-V2, which was well calibrated against observations at 26 flux sites across nine land cover types. PML-V2 (China) performs satisfactorily in the plot- and basin-scale evaluations compared with other mainstream products. It improved intra-annual ET and GPP dynamics, particularly in the cropland ecosystem.
Han Ma, Shunlin Liang, Changhao Xiong, Qian Wang, Aolin Jia, and Bing Li
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5333–5347, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5333-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5333-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) is one of the essential climate variables. This study generated a global land surface FAPAR product with a 250 m resolution based on a deep learning model that takes advantage of the existing FAPAR products and MODIS time series of observation information. Direct validation and intercomparison revealed that our product better meets user requirements and has a greater spatiotemporal continuity than other existing products.
Hannah Adams, Jane Ye, Bhaleka D. Persaud, Stephanie Slowinski, Homa Kheyrollah Pour, and Philippe Van Cappellen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5139–5156, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5139-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5139-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate warming and land-use changes are altering the environmental factors that control the algal
productivityin lakes. To predict how environmental factors like nutrient concentrations, ice cover, and water temperature will continue to influence lake productivity in this changing climate, we created a dataset of chlorophyll-a concentrations (a compound found in algae), associated water quality parameters, and solar radiation that can be used to for a wide range of research questions.
Mathew Lipson, Sue Grimmond, Martin Best, Winston T. L. Chow, Andreas Christen, Nektarios Chrysoulakis, Andrew Coutts, Ben Crawford, Stevan Earl, Jonathan Evans, Krzysztof Fortuniak, Bert G. Heusinkveld, Je-Woo Hong, Jinkyu Hong, Leena Järvi, Sungsoo Jo, Yeon-Hee Kim, Simone Kotthaus, Keunmin Lee, Valéry Masson, Joseph P. McFadden, Oliver Michels, Wlodzimierz Pawlak, Matthias Roth, Hirofumi Sugawara, Nigel Tapper, Erik Velasco, and Helen Claire Ward
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5157–5178, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5157-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5157-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We describe a new openly accessible collection of atmospheric observations from 20 cities around the world, capturing 50 site years. The observations capture local meteorology (temperature, humidity, wind, etc.) and the energy fluxes between the land and atmosphere (e.g. radiation and sensible and latent heat fluxes). These observations can be used to improve our understanding of urban climate processes and to test the accuracy of urban climate models.
Keyang He, Houyuan Lu, Jianping Zhang, and Can Wang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4777–4791, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4777-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4777-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Here we presented the first quantitative spatiotemporal cropping patterns spanning the Neolithic and Bronze ages in northern China. Temporally, millet agriculture underwent a dramatic transition from low-yield broomcorn to high-yield foxtail millet around 6000 cal. a BP under the influence of climate and population. Spatially, millet agriculture spread westward and northward from the mid-lower Yellow River (MLY) to the agro-pastoral ecotone (APE) around 6000 cal. a BP and diversified afterwards.
Kailiang Yu, Johan van den Hoogen, Zhiqiang Wang, Colin Averill, Devin Routh, Gabriel Reuben Smith, Rebecca E. Drenovsky, Kate M. Scow, Fei Mo, Mark P. Waldrop, Yuanhe Yang, Weize Tang, Franciska T. De Vries, Richard D. Bardgett, Peter Manning, Felipe Bastida, Sara G. Baer, Elizabeth M. Bach, Carlos García, Qingkui Wang, Linna Ma, Baodong Chen, Xianjing He, Sven Teurlincx, Amber Heijboer, James A. Bradley, and Thomas W. Crowther
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4339–4350, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4339-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4339-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We used a global-scale dataset for the surface topsoil (>3000 distinct observations of abundance of soil fungi versus bacteria) to generate the first quantitative map of soil fungal proportion across terrestrial ecosystems. We reveal striking latitudinal trends. Fungi dominated in regions with low mean annual temperature (MAT) and net primary productivity (NPP) and bacteria dominated in regions with high MAT and NPP.
Juha Lemmetyinen, Juval Cohen, Anna Kontu, Juho Vehviläinen, Henna-Reetta Hannula, Ioanna Merkouriadi, Stefan Scheiblauer, Helmut Rott, Thomas Nagler, Elisabeth Ripper, Kelly Elder, Hans-Peter Marshall, Reinhard Fromm, Marc Adams, Chris Derksen, Joshua King, Adriano Meta, Alex Coccia, Nick Rutter, Melody Sandells, Giovanni Macelloni, Emanuele Santi, Marion Leduc-Leballeur, Richard Essery, Cecile Menard, and Michael Kern
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3915–3945, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3915-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3915-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The manuscript describes airborne, dual-polarised X and Ku band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data collected over several campaigns over snow-covered terrain in Finland, Austria and Canada. Colocated snow and meteorological observations are also presented. The data are meant for science users interested in investigating X/Ku band radar signatures from natural environments in winter conditions.
Alejandro Miranda, Rayén Mentler, Ítalo Moletto-Lobos, Gabriela Alfaro, Leonardo Aliaga, Dana Balbontín, Maximiliano Barraza, Susanne Baumbach, Patricio Calderón, Fernando Cárdenas, Iván Castillo, Gonzalo Contreras, Felipe de la Barra, Mauricio Galleguillos, Mauro E. González, Carlos Hormazábal, Antonio Lara, Ian Mancilla, Francisca Muñoz, Cristian Oyarce, Francisca Pantoja, Rocío Ramírez, and Vicente Urrutia
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3599–3613, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3599-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3599-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Achieving a local understanding of fire regimes requires high-resolution, systematic and dynamic data. High-quality information can help to transform evidence into decision-making. Taking advantage of big-data and remote sensing technics we developed a flexible workflow to reconstruct burned area and fire severity data for more than 8000 individual fires in Chile. The framework developed for the database can be applied anywhere in the world with minimal adaptation.
Agustín Sarquis, Ignacio Andrés Siebenhart, Amy Theresa Austin, and Carlos A. Sierra
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3471–3488, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3471-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3471-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Plant litter breakdown in aridlands is driven by processes different from those in more humid ecosystems. A better understanding of these processes will allow us to make better predictions of future carbon cycling. We have compiled aridec, a database of plant litter decomposition studies in aridlands and tested some modeling applications for potential users. Aridec is open for use and collaboration, and we hope it will help answer newer and more important questions as the database develops.
Ulrike Herzschuh, Chenzhi Li, Thomas Böhmer, Alexander K. Postl, Birgit Heim, Andrei A. Andreev, Xianyong Cao, Mareike Wieczorek, and Jian Ni
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3213–3227, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3213-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3213-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Pollen preserved in environmental archives such as lake sediments and bogs are extensively used for reconstructions of past vegetation and climate. Here we present LegacyPollen 1.0, a dataset of 2831 fossil pollen records from all over the globe that were collected from publicly available databases. We harmonized the names of the pollen taxa so that all datasets can be jointly investigated. LegacyPollen 1.0 is available as an open-access dataset.
Cited articles
Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP):
https://agmip.org/, last access: 31 December 2022.
Alkhalifah, N., Campbell, D. A., Falcon, C. M., Gardiner, J. M., Miller, N. D., Romay, M. C., Walls, R., Walton, R., Yeh, C.-T., Bohn, M., Bubert, J.,
Buckler, E. S., Ciampitti, I., Flint-Garcia, S., Gore, M. A., Graham, C.,
Hirsch, C., Holland, J. B., Hooker, D., Kaeppler, S., Knoll, J., Lauter, N.,
Lee, E. C., Lorenz, A., Lynch, J. P., Moose, S. P., Murray, S. C., Nelson,
R., Rocheford, T., Rodriguez, O., Schnable, J. C., Scully, B., Smith, M.,
Springer, N., Thomison, P., Tuinstra, M., Wisser, R. J., Xu, W., Ertl, D.,
Schnable, P. S., De Leon, N., Spalding, E. P., Edwards, J., and
Lawrence-Dill, C. J.: Maize Genomes to Fields: 2014 and 2015 field season
genotype, phenotype, environment, and inbred ear image datasets, BMC Res.
Notes, 11, 452, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-018-3508-1, 2018.
Amaranto, A., Munoz-Arriola, F., Corzo, G., Solomatine, D. P., and Meyer,
G.: Semi-seasonal groundwater forecast using multiple data-driven models in
an irrigated cropland, J. Hydroinform., 20, 1227–1246,
https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2018.002, 2018.
Amaranto, A., Munoz-Arriola, F., Solomatine, D. P., and Corzo, G.: A
Spatially Enhanced Data-Driven Multimodel to Improve Semiseasonal
Groundwater Forecasts in the High Plains Aquifer, USA, Water Resour. Res.,
55, 5941–5961, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024301, 2019.
Amaranto, A., Pianosi, F., Solomatine, D., Corzo, G., and Muñoz-Arriola,
F.: Sensitivity analysis of data-driven groundwater forecasts to
hydroclimatic controls in irrigated croplands, J. Hydrol., 587, 124957,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124957, 2020.
Araus, J. L., Kefauver, S. C., Zaman-Allah, M., Olsen, M. S., and Cairns, J. E.: Translating high-throughput phenotyping into genetic gain, Trends Plant Sci., 23, 451–466, 2018.
Aslam, H., Sarzaeim, P., and Munoz-Arriola, F.: CLImate for Maize OMICS: CLIM4OMICS Analytics and Database (2.0), Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8002909, 2023a.
Aslam, H., Sarzaeim, P., and Munoz-Arriola, F.:
HasnatJutt/CLImate-for-Maize-OMICS_CLIM4OMICS-Analytics-and-Database: CLImate-for-Maize-OMICS_CLIM4OMICS-Analytics-and-Database Code, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8161662, 2023b.
Aslam, H., Sarzaeim, P., and Munoz-Arriola, F.:
HasnatJutt/CLImate-for-Maize-OMICS_CLIM4OMICS-Analytics-and-Database: CLImate-for-Maize-OMICS_CLIM4OMICS-Analytics-and-Database Code, GitHub [code],
https://github.com/HasnatJutt/CLImate-for-Maize-OMICS_CLIM4OMICS-Analytics-and-Database/tree/v2.0 (last access: 18 July 2023), 2023c.
Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J. W., Hatfield, J. L., Ruane,
A. C., Boote, K. J., Thorburn, P. J., Rötter, R. P., Cammarano, D.,
Brisson, N., Basso, B., Martre, P., Aggarwal, P. K., Angulo, C., Bertuzzi,
P., Biernath, C., Challinor, A. J., Doltra, J., Gayler, S., Goldberg, R.,
Grant, R., Heng, L., Hooker, J., Hunt, L. A., Ingwersen, J., Izaurralde, R.
C., Kersebaum, K. C., Müller, C., Naresh Kumar, S., Nendel, C., O'Leary,
G., Olesen, J. E., Osborne, T. M., Palosuo, T., Priesack, E., Ripoche, D.,
Semenov, M. A., Shcherbak, I., Steduto, P., Stöckle, C., Stratonovitch,
P., Streck, T., Supit, I., Tao, F., Travasso, M., Waha, K., Wallach, D.,
White, J. W., Williams, J. R., and Wolf, J.: Uncertainty in simulating wheat
yields under climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 3, 827–832,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1916, 2013.
Baru, C., DeBlanc-Knowles, T., Campbell, L., George, J., Chang, W., and Halbert, M.: Open knowledge network roadmap – powering the next data revolution, OKN Innovation Sprint Organizing Committee, NSF, https://nsf-gov-resources.nsf.gov/2022-09/OKN%20Roadmap%20-%20Report_v03.pdf (last access: 30 August 2023), 2022.
Blum, A.: Drought Resistance and Its Improvement, in: Plant Breeding for
Water-Limited Environments, edited by: Blum, A., Springer, New York, NY,
53–152, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7491-4_3, 2011.
Bradbury, P. J., Zhang, Z., Kroon, D. E., Casstevens, T. M., Ramdoss, Y.,
and Buckler, E. S.: TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex
traits in diverse samples, Bioinformatics, 23, 2633–2635,
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308, 2007.
Brönnimann, S., Annis, J., Dann, W., Ewen, T., Grant, A. N., Griesser, T., Krähenmann, S., Mohr, C., Scherer, M., and Vogler, C.: A guide for digitising manuscript climate data, Clim. Past, 2, 137–144, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-2-137-2006, 2006.
Bruno, F., Cocchi, D., Greco, F., and Scardovi, E.: Spatial reconstruction
of rainfall fields from rain gauge and radar data, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk
Assess., 28, 1235–1245, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0812-0, 2014.
Cattivelli, L., Rizza, F., Badeck, F.-W., Mazzucotelli, E., Mastrangelo, A.
M., Francia, E., Marè, C., Tondelli, A., and Stanca, A. M.: Drought
tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to
genomics, Field Crops Res., 105, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004, 2008.
Chiu, C.-A., Lin, P.-H., and Lu, K.-C.: GIS-based Tests for Quality Control
of Meteorological Data and Spatial Interpolation of Climate Data, Mt. Res.
Dev., 29, 339–349, https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.00030, 2009.
Di Paola, A., Valentini, R., and Santini, M.: An overview of available crop
growth and yield models for studies and assessments in agriculture, J. Sci.
Food Agric., 96, 709–714, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7359, 2016.
Feng, S., Hu, Q., and Qian, W.: Quality control of daily meteorological data
in China, 1951–2000: a new dataset, Int. J. Climatol., 24, 853–870,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1047, 2004.
Firican, G.: The 10 Vs of Big Data, TDWI, https://tdwi.org/articles/2017/02/08/10-vs-of-big-data.aspx (last access: 31 December 2022), 2017.
Furche, T., Gottlob, G., Neumayr, B., and Sallinger, E.: Data Wrangling for Big Data: Towards a Lingua Franca for Data Wrangling, Proceedings of the 10th Alberto Mendelzon International Workshop on Foundations of Data Management, 8–10 May 2016, Panama City, Panama, CEUR Workshop Proceedings 1644, https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1644/paper20.pdf (last access: 31 August 2023), 2016.
Genomes to Fields: Genomes to Fields Phenotyping Handbook, Genomes to Fields initiative, https://www.genomes2fields.org/docs/Genomes_to_Fields_Phenotype_Handbook.pdf (last access: 30 August 2023), 2013.
Genomes to Fields initiative: Phenotypic, genotypic, and environment data,
CyVerse [data set], https://doi.org/10.25739/9wjm-eq41, 2014.
Genomes to Fields initiative: Phenotypic, genotypic, and environment data,
CyVerse [data set], https://doi.org/10.25739/erxg-yn49, 2015.
Genomes to Fields initiative: Phenotypic, genotypic, and environment data,
CyVerse [data set], https://doi.org/10.25739/yjnh-kt21, 2016.
Genomes to Fields initiative: Phenotypic, genotypic, and environment data,
CyVerse [data set], https://doi.org/10.25739/w560-2114, 2017.
Genomes to Fields initiative: Phenotypic, genotypic, and environment data, CyVerse [data set], https://doi.org/10.25739/anqq-sg86, 2018.
Genomes to Fields initiative: Phenotypic, genotypic, and environment data, CyVerse [data set], https://doi.org/10.25739/t651-yy97, 2019.
Genomes to Fields initiative: Phenotypic, genotypic, and environment data, CyVerse [data set], https://doi.org/10.25739/hzzs-a865, 2020.
Genomes to Fields initiative: Phenotypic, genotypic, and environment data, CyVerse [data set], https://doi.org/10.25739/5ae3-sw62, 2021.
Germeier, C. U. and Unger, S.: Modeling Crop Genetic Resources Phenotyping
Information Systems, Front. Plant Sci., 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00728, 2019.
Gómez-Dans, J. L., Lewis, P. E., Yin, F., Asare, K., Lamptey, P., Aidoo, K. K. Y., MacCarthy, D. S., Ma, H., Wu, Q., Addi, M., Aboagye-Ntow, S., Doe, C. E., Alhassan, R., Kankam-Boadu, I., Huang, J., and Li, X.: Location, biophysical and agronomic parameters for croplands in northern Ghana, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5387–5410, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5387-2022, 2022.
González-Rouco, J. F., Jiménez, J. L., Quesada, V., and Valero, F.:
Quality Control and Homogeneity of Precipitation Data in the Southwest of
Europe, J. Climate, 14, 964–978,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<0964:QCAHOP>2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Habib, A., Kersting, A. P., Bang, K. I., and Lee, D.-C.: Alternative
Methodologies for the Internal Quality Control of Parallel LiDAR Strips,
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 48, 221–236,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2009.2026424, 2010.
Hartkamp, A. D., White, J. W., and Hoogenboom, G.: Interfacing Geographic
Information Systems with Agronomic Modeling: A Review, Agron. J., 91,
761–772, https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1999.915761x, 1999.
Huang, J., Gómez-Dans, J. L., Huang, H., Ma, H., Wu, Q., Lewis, P. E.,
Liang, S., Chen, Z., Xue, J.-H., Wu, Y., Zhao, F., Wang, J., and Xie, X.:
Assimilation of remote sensing into crop growth models: Current status and
perspectives, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 276–277, 107609,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.06.008, 2019.
Hubbard, K. G., Goddard, S., Sorensen, W. D., Wells, N., and Osugi, T. T.:
Performance of Quality Assurance Procedures for an Applied Climate
Information System, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 22, 105–112,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-1657.1, 2005.
Jaimes-Correa, J. C., Muñoz-Arriola, F., and Bartelt-Hunt, S.: Modeling
Water Quantity and Quality Nonlinearities for Watershed Adaptability to
Hydroclimate Extremes in Agricultural Landscapes, Hydrology, 9, 80,
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9050080, 2022.
Janev, V.: Chapter 1 Ecosystem of Big Data, in: Knowledge Graphs and Big
Data Processing, edited by: Janev, V., Graux, D., Jabeen, H., and Sallinger,
E., Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–19,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53199-7_1, 2020.
Jarquín, D., Kocak, K., Posadas, L., Hyma, K., Jedlicka, J., Graef, G.,
and Lorenz, A.: Genotyping by sequencing for genomic prediction in a soybean
breeding population, BMC Genomics, 15, 740,
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-740, 2014.
Jarquín, D., Lemes da Silva, C., Gaynor, R. C., Poland, J., Fritz, A.,
Howard, R., Battenfield, S., and Crossa, J.: Increasing Genomic-Enabled
Prediction Accuracy by Modeling Genotype × Environment Interactions
in Kansas Wheat, Plant Genome-US, 10, 1–15,
https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2016.12.0130, 2017.
Jarquin, D., de Leon, N., Romay, C., Bohn, M., Buckler, E. S., Ciampitti,
I., Edwards, J., Ertl, D., Flint-Garcia, S., Gore, M. A., Graham, C.,
Hirsch, C. N., Holland, J. B., Hooker, D., Kaeppler, S. M., Knoll, J., Lee,
E. C., Lawrence-Dill, C. J., Lynch, J. P., Moose, S. P., Murray, S. C.,
Nelson, R., Rocheford, T., Schnable, J. C., Schnable, P. S., Smith, M.,
Springer, N., Thomison, P., Tuinstra, M., Wisser, R. J., Xu, W., Yu, J., and
Lorenz, A.: Utility of Climatic Information via Combining Ability Models to
Improve Genomic Prediction for Yield Within the Genomes to Fields Maize
Project, Front. Genet., 11, 592769, https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.592769, 2021.
Jiang, R., Wang, T., Shao, J., Guo, S., Zhu, W., Yu, Y., Chen, S., and
Hatano, R.: Modeling the biomass of energy crops: Descriptions, strengths
and prospective, J. Integr. Agric., 16, 1197–1210,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(16)61592-7, 2017.
Lawrence-Dill, C. J., Schnable, P. S., and Springer, N. M.: Idea Factory:
the Maize Genomes to Fields Initiative, Crop Sci., 59, 1406–1410,
https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2019.02.0071, 2019.
Lin, Y.-C. and Habib, A.: Quality control and crop characterization
framework for multi-temporal UAV LiDAR data over mechanized agricultural
fields, Remote Sens. Environ., 256, 112299,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112299, 2021.
Liu, H., Wood, A. W., Newman, A. J., and Clark, M. P.: Ensemble Dressing of
Meteorological Fields: Using Spatial Regression to Estimate Uncertainty in
Deterministic Gridded Meteorological Datasets, J. Hydrometeorol., 23,
1525–1543, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-21-0176.1, 2022.
Livneh, B., Rosenberg, E. A., Lin, C., Nijssen, B., Mishra, V., Andreadis,
K. M., Maurer, E. P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: A Long-Term Hydrologically
Based Dataset of Land Surface Fluxes and States for the Conterminous United
States: Update and Extensions, J. Climate, 26, 9384–9392,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00508.1, 2013.
Livneh, B., Bohn, T. J., Pierce, D. W., Munoz-Arriola, F., Nijssen, B.,
Vose, R., Cayan, D. R., and Brekke, L.: A spatially comprehensive,
hydrometeorological data set for Mexico, the U.S., and Southern Canada
1950–2013, Sci. Data, 2, 150042, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.42, 2015.
Lopes, M. S., El-Basyoni, I., Baenziger, P. S., Singh, S., Royo, C., Ozbek,
K., Aktas, H., Ozer, E., Ozdemir, F., Manickavelu, A., Ban, T., and Vikram,
P.: Exploiting genetic diversity from landraces in wheat breeding for
adaptation to climate change, J. Exp. Bot., 66, 3477–3486,
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv122, 2015.
Matthews, J. L., Mannshardt, E., and Gremaud, P.: Uncertainty Quantification
for Climate Observations, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, ES21–ES25,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00042.1, 2013.
Maurer, E. P., Wood, A. W., Adam, J. C., Lettenmaier, D. P., and Nijssen,
B.: A Long-Term Hydrologically Based Dataset of Land Surface Fluxes and
States for the Conterminous United States, J. Climate, 15, 3237–3251,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<3237:ALTHBD>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
McFarland, B. A., Alkhalifah, N., Bohn, M., Bubert, J., Buckler, E. S.,
Ciampitti, I., Edwards, J., Ertl, D., Gage, J. L., Falcon, C. M.,
Flint-Garcia, S., Gore, M. A., Graham, C., Hirsch, C. N., Holland, J. B.,
Hood, E., Hooker, D., Jarquin, D., Kaeppler, S. M., Knoll, J., Kruger, G.,
Lauter, N., Lee, E. C., Lima, D. C., Lorenz, A., Lynch, J. P., McKay, J.,
Miller, N. D., Moose, S. P., Murray, S. C., Nelson, R., Poudyal, C.,
Rocheford, T., Rodriguez, O., Romay, M. C., Schnable, J. C., Schnable, P.
S., Scully, B., Sekhon, R., Silverstein, K., Singh, M., Smith, M., Spalding,
E. P., Springer, N., Thelen, K., Thomison, P., Tuinstra, M., Wallace, J.,
Walls, R., Wills, D., Wisser, R. J., Xu, W., Yeh, C. T., and De Leon, N.:
Maize genomes to fields (G2F): 2014–2017 field seasons: Genotype, phenotype,
climatic, soil, and inbred ear image datasets, BMC Res. Notes, 13, 71,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-020-4922-8, 2020.
Merchant, C. J., Paul, F., Popp, T., Ablain, M., Bontemps, S., Defourny, P., Hollmann, R., Lavergne, T., Laeng, A., de Leeuw, G., Mittaz, J., Poulsen, C., Povey, A. C., Reuter, M., Sathyendranath, S., Sandven, S., Sofieva, V. F., and Wagner, W.: Uncertainty information in climate data records from Earth observation, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 511–527, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-511-2017, 2017.
Muñoz-Arriola, F., Avissar, R., Zhu, C., and Lettenmaier, D. P.:
Sensitivity of the water resources of Rio Yaqui Basin, Mexico, to
agriculture extensification under multiscale climate conditions, Water
Resour. Res., 45, W00A20, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006783, 2009.
Overpeck, J. T., Meehl, G. A., Bony, S., and Easterling, D. R.: Climate Data
Challenges in the 21st Century, Science, 331, 700–702,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197869, 2011.
Peng, G., Lacagnina, C., Downs, R. R., Ganske, A., Ramapriyan, H. K.,
Ivánová, I., Wyborn, L., Jones, D., Bastin, L., Shie, C., and
Moroni, D. F.: Global Community Guidelines for Documenting, Sharing, and
Reusing Quality Information of Individual Digital Datasets, Data Sci. J.,
21, 8, https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2022-008, 2022.
Persa, R., Grondona, M., and Jarquin, D.: Development of genomic prediction
pipeline for maintaining comparable sample sizes in training and testing
sets across prediction schemes accounting for the genotype-by-environment
interaction, Agriculture, 11, 932,
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11100932, 2021.
Pogson, M.: Modelling Miscanthus yields with low resolution input data,
Ecol. Model., 222, 3849–3853, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.10.008, 2011.
Poland, J., Endelman, J., Dawson, J., Rutkoski, J., Wu, S., Manes, Y.,
Dreisigacker, S., Crossa, J., Sánchez-Villeda, H., Sorrells, M., and
Jannink, J.-L.: Genomic Selection in Wheat Breeding using
Genotyping-by-Sequencing, Plant Genome, 5, 103–113,
https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2012.06.0006, 2012.
Pollock, M. D., O'Donnell, G., Quinn, P., Dutton, M., Black, A., Wilkinson,
M. E., Colli, M., Stagnaro, M., Lanza, L. G., Lewis, E., Kilsby, C. G., and
O'Connell, P. E.: Quantifying and Mitigating Wind-Induced Undercatch in
Rainfall Measurements, Water Resour. Res., 54, 3863–3875,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022421, 2018.
Quiñones, R., Munoz-Arriola, F., Choudhury, S. D., and Samal, A.:
Multi-feature data repository development and analytics for image
cosegmentation in high-throughput plant phenotyping, PLOS ONE, 16, e0257001,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257001, 2021.
Rehana, S., Yeleswarapu, P., Basha, G., and Munoz-Arriola, F.: Precipitation
and temperature extremes and association with large-scale climate indices:
An observational evidence over India, J. Earth Syst. Sci., 131, 170,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-022-01911-3, 2022.
Reyer, C. P. O., Silveyra Gonzalez, R., Dolos, K., Hartig, F., Hauf, Y., Noack, M., Lasch-Born, P., Rötzer, T., Pretzsch, H., Meesenburg, H., Fleck, S., Wagner, M., Bolte, A., Sanders, T. G. M., Kolari, P., Mäkelä, A., Vesala, T., Mammarella, I., Pumpanen, J., Collalti, A., Trotta, C., Matteucci, G., D'Andrea, E., Foltýnová, L., Krejza, J., Ibrom, A., Pilegaard, K., Loustau, D., Bonnefond, J.-M., Berbigier, P., Picart, D., Lafont, S., Dietze, M., Cameron, D., Vieno, M., Tian, H., Palacios-Orueta, A., Cicuendez, V., Recuero, L., Wiese, K., Büchner, M., Lange, S., Volkholz, J., Kim, H., Horemans, J. A., Bohn, F., Steinkamp, J., Chikalanov, A., Weedon, G. P., Sheffield, J., Babst, F., Vega del Valle, I., Suckow, F., Martel, S., Mahnken, M., Gutsch, M., and Frieler, K.: The PROFOUND Database for evaluating vegetation models and simulating climate impacts on European forests, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1295–1320, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1295-2020, 2020.
Rico, D. A., Detweiler, C., and Muñoz-Arriola, F.: Power-over-Tether UAS
Leveraged for Nearly-Indefinite Meteorological Data Acquisition, in: 2020
ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting, 12–15 July 2020, Omaha, NE, USA, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, p. 1, https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.202001345, 2020.
Rico, D. A., Muñoz-Arriola, F., and Detweiler, D.: Trajectory selection
for power-over-tether atmospheric sensing UAS, in: 2021 IEEE/RSJ
International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 27 September–1 October 2021, Prague, Czech Republic, IEEE, 2321–2328, https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9636364, 2021.
Robertson, A. D., Davies, C. A., Smith, P., Dondini, M., and McNamara, N.
P.: Modelling the carbon cycle of Miscanthus plantations: existing models
and the potential for their improvement, GCB Bioenergy, 7, 405–421,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12144, 2014.
Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J. W., Hatfield, J. L., Ruane, A. C., Boote, K. J.,
Thorburn, P., Antle, J. M., Nelson, G. C., Porter, C., Janssen, S., Asseng,
S., Basso, B., Ewert, F., Wallach, D., Baigorria, G., and Winter, J. M.: The
Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP):
Protocols and pilot studies, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 170, 166–182,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.011, 2013.
Ruane, A. C., Goldberg, R., and Chryssanthacopoulos, J.: Climate forcing
datasets for agricultural modeling: Merged products for gap-filling and
historical climate series estimation, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 200, 233–248,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.09.016, 2015.
Sarzaeim, P., Muñoz-Arriola, F., and Jarquin, D.: Analytics for
climate-uncertainty estimation and propagation in maize-phenotype
predictions, in: 2020 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting, 13–15 July 2020, Omaha, NE, USA, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.202000884, 2020.
Sarzaeim, P., Ou, W., de Oliveira, L. A., and Munoz-Arriola, F.: Flood-Risk
Analytics for Climate-Resilient Agriculture Using Remote Sensing in the
Northern High Plains, GEO-Extreme, GSP 329, 234–244, https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483695.023, 2021.
Sarzaeim, P., Muñoz-Arriola, F., and Jarquín, D.: Climate and
genetic data enhancement using deep learning analytics to improve maize
yield predictability, J. Exp. Bot., 73, 5336–5354,
https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac146, 2022a.
Sarzaeim, P., Munoz-Arriola, F., and Jarquín, D.: Large-scale and
Multi-dimensional Climate, Genetics, and Phenotypes Database for Maize Yield
Predictability in the U.S. and Canada, Zenodo [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6299090, 2022b.
Sengupta, M., Xie, Y., Lopez, A., Habte, A., Maclaurin, G., and Shelby, J.:
The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB), Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,
89, 51–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.003, 2018.
Sertel, E., Robock, A., and Ormeci, C.: Impacts of land cover data quality
on regional climate simulations, Int. J. Climatol., 30, 1942–1953,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.2036, 2010.
Shekhar, S., Colletti, J., Muñoz-Arriola, F., Ramaswamy, L., Krintz, C.,
Varshney, L., and Richardson, D.: Intelligent Infrastructure for Smart
Agriculture: An Integrated Food, Energy and Water System, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.01993, 4 May 2017.
Steiner, A. K., Hunt, D., Ho, S.-P., Kirchengast, G., Mannucci, A. J., Scherllin-Pirscher, B., Gleisner, H., von Engeln, A., Schmidt, T., Ao, C., Leroy, S. S., Kursinski, E. R., Foelsche, U., Gorbunov, M., Heise, S., Kuo, Y.-H., Lauritsen, K. B., Marquardt, C., Rocken, C., Schreiner, W., Sokolovskiy, S., Syndergaard, S., and Wickert, J.: Quantification of structural uncertainty in climate data records from GPS radio occultation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1469–1484, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1469-2013, 2013.
Surendran Nair, S., Kang, S., Zhang, X., Miguez, F. E., Izaurralde, R. C.,
Post, W. M., Dietze, M. C., Lynd, L. R., and Wullschleger, S. D.: Bioenergy
crop models: descriptions, data requirements, and future challenges, GCB
Bioenergy, 4, 620–633, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01166.x,
2012.
Tang, Q., Vivoni, E. R., Muñoz-Arriola, F., and Lettenmaier, D. P.:
Predictability of Evapotranspiration Patterns Using Remotely Sensed
Vegetation Dynamics during the North American Monsoon, J. Hydrometeorol.,
13, 103–121, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-032.1, 2012.
TASSEL: https://tassel.bitbucket.io/ (last access: 30 August 2023), 2022.
Thornton, M. M., Shrestha, R., Wei, Y., Thornton, P. E., Kao, S.-C., and
Wilson, B. E.: Daymet: Daily Surface Weather Data on a 1-km Grid for North
America, Version 4 R1, ORNL DAAC, https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/2129, 2022.
van Wart, J., Grassini, P., and Cassman, K. G.: Impact of derived global
weather data on simulated crop yields, Glob. Change Biol., 19, 3822,
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12302, 2013.
Weber, T. K. D., Ingwersen, J., Högy, P., Poyda, A., Wizemann, H.-D., Demyan, M. S., Bohm, K., Eshonkulov, R., Gayler, S., Kremer, P., Laub, M., Nkwain, Y. F., Troost, C., Witte, I., Reichenau, T., Berger, T., Cadisch, G., Müller, T., Fangmeier, A., Wulfmeyer, V., and Streck, T.: Multi-site, multi-crop measurements in the soil–vegetation–atmosphere continuum: a comprehensive dataset from two climatically contrasting regions in southwestern Germany for the period 2009–2018, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1153–1181, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1153-2022, 2022.
Westhues, C. C., Simianer, H., and Beissinger, T. M.: learnMET: an R
package to apply machine learning methods for genomic prediction using
multi-environment trial data, G3-Genes Genom. Genet., 12, jkac226,
https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkac226, 2022.
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton,
M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne,
P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon,
O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Gray, A.
J. G., Groth, P., Goble, C., Grethe, J. S., Heringa, J., 't Hoen, P. A. C.,
Hooft, R., Kuhn, T., Kok, R., Kok, J., Lusher, S. J., Martone, M. E., Mons,
A., Packer, A. L., Persson, B., Rocca-Serra, P., Roos, M., van Schaik, R., Sansone, S.-A., Schultes, E., Sengstag, T.,
Slater, T., Strawn, G., Swertz, M. A., Thompson, M., van der Lei, J., van
Mulligen, E., Velterop, J., Waagmeester, A., Wittenburg, P., Wolstencroft,
K., Zhao, J., and Mons, B.: The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data
management and stewardship, Sci. Data, 3, 160018,
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18, 2016.
Winn, C. A., Archontoulis, S., and Edwards, J.: Calibration of a crop
growth model in APSIM for 15 publicly available corn hybrids in North
America, Crop Sci., 63, 511–534, https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20857, 2023.
Zeng, Y., Su, Z., Calvet, J.-C., Manninen, T., Swinnen, E., Schulz, J.,
Roebeling, R., Poli, P., Tan, D., Riihelä, A., Tanis, C.-M., Arslan,
A.-N., Obregon, A., Kaiser-Weiss, A., John, V. O., Timmermans, W.,
Timmermans, J., Kaspar, F., Gregow, H., Barbu, A.-L., Fairbairn, D., Gelati,
E., and Meurey, C.: Analysis of current validation practices in Europe for
space-based climate data records of essential climate variables, Int. J.
Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinform., 42, 150–161,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2015.06.006, 2015.
Short summary
A genomic, phenomic, and climate database for maize phenotype predictability in the US and Canada is introduced. The database encompasses climate from multiple sources and OMICS from the Genomes to Fields initiative (G2F) data from 2014 to 2021, including codes for input data quality and consistency controls. Earth system modelers and breeders can use CLIM4OMICS since it interconnects the climate and biological system sciences. CLIM4OMICS is designed to foster phenotype predictability.
A genomic, phenomic, and climate database for maize phenotype predictability in the US and...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint