Articles | Volume 15, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1765-2023
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1765-2023
Data description paper
 | 
19 Apr 2023
Data description paper |  | 19 Apr 2023

A global Lagrangian eddy dataset based on satellite altimetry

Tongya Liu and Ryan Abernathey

Related authors

The coupled Southern Ocean–Sea ice–Ice shelf Model (SOSIM v1.0): configuration and evaluation
Chengyan Liu, Zhaomin Wang, Dake Chen, Xianxian Han, Hengling Leng, Xi Liang, Liangjun Yan, Xiang Li, Craig Stevens, Andrew Hogg, Kazuya Kusahara, Kaihe Yamazaki, Kay Ohshima, Meng Zhou, Xiao Cheng, Dongxiao Wang, Changming Dong, Jiping Liu, Qinghua Yang, Xichen Li, Ruibo Lei, Minghu Ding, Zhaoru Zhang, Dujuan Kang, Di Qi, Tongya Liu, Jihai Dong, Lu An, Ru Chen, Tong Zhang, Xiaoming Hu, Bo Han, Haibo Bi, Qi Shu, Longjiang Mu, Shiming Xu, Hu Yang, Hailong Liu, Tingfeng Dou, Zhixuan Feng, Lei Zheng, Xueyuan Tang, Guitao Shi, Yongqing Cai, Bingrui Li, Yang Wu, Xia Lin, Wenjin Sun, Yu Liu, Kai Yu, Yu Zhang, Weizeng Shao, Xiaoyu Wang, Shaojun Zheng, Chengyi Yuan, Chunxia Zhou, Jian Liu, Yang Liu, Yue Xia, Xiaoyu Pan, Jiabao Zeng, Kechen Liu, Jiahao Fan, Chen Cheng, and Qi Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6487,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6487, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
MASCS 1.0: synchronous atmospheric and oceanic data from a cross-shaped moored array in the northern South China Sea during 2014–2015
Han Zhang, Dake Chen, Tongya Liu, Di Tian, Min He, Qi Li, Guofei Wei, and Jian Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5665–5679, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5665-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5665-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Abernathey, R. and Haller, G.: Transport by lagrangian vortices in the eastern pacific, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 48, 667–685, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n
Abernathey, R. P. and Marshall, J.: Global surface eddy diffusivities derived from satellite altimetry, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 118, 901–916, 2013. a, b
Adcroft, A., Campin, J.-M., Doddridge, S. D., Evangelinos, C., Ferreira, D., Follows, M., Forget, G., Hill, H., Jahn, O., Klymak, J., Losch, M., Marshall, J., Maze, G., Mazloff, M., Menemenlis, D., Molod, A., and Scott, J.: MITgcm documentation, Release checkpoint67a-12-gbf23121, 19, https://buildmedia.readthedocs.org/media/pdf/mitgcm/latest/mitgcm.pdf (last access: 14 April 2023), 2018. a
Ballarotta, M., Ubelmann, C., Pujol, M.-I., Taburet, G., Fournier, F., Legeais, J.-F., Faugère, Y., Delepoulle, A., Chelton, D., Dibarboure, G., and Picot, N.: On the resolutions of ocean altimetry maps, Ocean Sci., 15, 1091–1109, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1091-2019, 2019. a
Beron-Vera, F. J., Wang, Y., Olascoaga, M. J., Goni, G. J., and Haller, G.: Objective detection of oceanic eddies and the Agulhas leakage, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 43, 1426–1438, 2013. a
Download
Short summary
Nearly all existing datasets of mesoscale eddies are based on the Eulerian method because of its operational simplicity. Using satellite observations and a Lagrangian method, we present a global Lagrangian eddy dataset (GLED v1.0). We conduct the statistical comparison between two types of eddies and the dataset validation. Our dataset offers relief from dilemma that the Eulerian eddy dataset is nearly the only option for studying mesoscale eddies.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint