Articles | Volume 14, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4251-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4251-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
DeepOWT: a global offshore wind turbine data set derived with deep learning from Sentinel-1 data
German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, Germany
Stefanie Feuerstein
German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, Germany
Claudia Kuenzer
German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, Germany
Department of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Mariel C. Dirscherl, Andreas J. Dietz, and Claudia Kuenzer
The Cryosphere, 15, 5205–5226, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5205-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5205-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We provide novel insight into the temporal evolution of supraglacial lakes across six major Antarctic ice shelves in 2015–2021. For Antarctic Peninsula ice shelves, we observe extensive meltwater ponding during the 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 summers. Over East Antarctica, lakes were widespread during 2016–2019 and at a minimum in 2020–2021. We investigate environmental controls, revealing lake ponding to be coupled to atmospheric modes, the near-surface climate and the local glaciological setting.
Celia A. Baumhoer, Andreas J. Dietz, Christof Kneisel, Heiko Paeth, and Claudia Kuenzer
The Cryosphere, 15, 2357–2381, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2357-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2357-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a record of circum-Antarctic glacier and ice shelf front change over the last two decades in combination with potential environmental variables forcing frontal retreat. Along the Antarctic coastline, glacier and ice shelf front retreat dominated between 1997–2008 and advance between 2009–2018. Decreasing sea ice days, intense snowmelt, weakening easterly winds, and relative changes in sea surface temperature were identified as enabling factors for glacier and ice shelf front retreat.
Related subject area
Domain: ESSD – Atmosphere | Subject: Energy and Emissions
The consolidated European synthesis of CO2 emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2020
High-resolution emission inventory of full-volatility organic compounds from cooking in China during 2015–2021
Decadal growth in emission load of major air pollutants in Delhi
Improved catalog of NOx point source emissions (version 2)
Global carbon uptake of cement carbonation accounts 1930–2021
The HTAP_v3 emission mosaic: merging regional and global monthly emissions (2000–2018) to support air quality modelling and policies
A dense station-based long-term and high-accuracy dataset of daily surface solar radiation in China
Indicators of Global Climate Change 2022: annual update of large-scale indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence
Emission trends of air pollutants and CO2 in China from 2005 to 2021
Ten years of 1 Hz solar irradiance observations at Cabauw, the Netherlands, with cloud observations, variability classifications, and statistics
The consolidated European synthesis of CH4 and N2O emissions for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2019
Spatially resolved hourly traffic emission over megacity Delhi using advanced traffic flow data
Near-real-time CO2 fluxes from CarbonTracker Europe for high-resolution atmospheric modeling
Retrievals of XCO2, XCH4 and XCO from portable, near-infrared Fourier transform spectrometer solar observations in Antarctica
Carbon fluxes from land 2000–2020: bringing clarity to countries' reporting
Matthew J. McGrath, Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Philippe Peylin, Robbie M. Andrew, Bradley Matthews, Frank Dentener, Juraj Balkovič, Vladislav Bastrikov, Meike Becker, Gregoire Broquet, Philippe Ciais, Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, Raphael Ganzenmüller, Giacomo Grassi, Ian Harris, Matthew Jones, Jürgen Knauer, Matthias Kuhnert, Guillaume Monteil, Saqr Munassar, Paul I. Palmer, Glen P. Peters, Chunjing Qiu, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Oksana Tarasova, Matteo Vizzarri, Karina Winkler, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Antoine Berchet, Peter Briggs, Patrick Brockmann, Frédéric Chevallier, Giulia Conchedda, Monica Crippa, Stijn N. C. Dellaert, Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon, Sara Filipek, Pierre Friedlingstein, Richard Fuchs, Michael Gauss, Christoph Gerbig, Diego Guizzardi, Dirk Günther, Richard A. Houghton, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Ronny Lauerwald, Bas Lerink, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Géraud Moulas, Marilena Muntean, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Aurélie Paquirissamy, Lucia Perugini, Wouter Peters, Roberto Pilli, Julia Pongratz, Pierre Regnier, Marko Scholze, Yusuf Serengil, Pete Smith, Efisio Solazzo, Rona L. Thompson, Francesco N. Tubiello, Timo Vesala, and Sophia Walther
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4295–4370, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate estimation of fluxes of carbon dioxide from the land surface is essential for understanding future impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the climate system. A wide variety of methods currently exist to estimate these sources and sinks. We are continuing work to develop annual comparisons of these diverse methods in order to clarify what they all actually calculate and to resolve apparent disagreement, in addition to highlighting opportunities for increased understanding.
Zeqi Li, Shuxiao Wang, Shengyue Li, Xiaochun Wang, Guanghan Huang, Xing Chang, Lyuyin Huang, Chengrui Liang, Yun Zhu, Haotian Zheng, Qian Song, Qingru Wu, Fenfen Zhang, and Bin Zhao
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-278, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-278, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
This study developed the first full-volatility organic emission inventory for cooking sources in China, presenting high-resolution cooking emissions during 2015–2021. It identified the key sub-sectors and hotspots of cooking emissions, analyzed emission trends and drivers, and proposed future control strategies. The dataset is valuable for accurately simulating organic aerosol formation and evolution and for understanding the impact of organic emissions on air pollution and climate change.
Saroj Kumar Sahu, Poonam Mangaraj, and Gufran Beig
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3183–3202, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3183-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3183-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The developed emission inventory identifies all the potential anthropogenic sources active in the Delhi NCR. The decadal change (2010–2020) and the changing policies have also been illustrated to observe the modulation in the sectorial emission trend. Emission hotspots with possible source-specific mitigation strategies have also been highlighted to improve the air quality of the Delhi NCR. The provided dataset is a vital tool for air quality and chemical transport modeling studies.
Steffen Beirle, Christian Borger, Adrian Jost, and Thomas Wagner
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3051–3073, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3051-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3051-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a catalog of nitrogen oxide emissions from point sources (like power plants or metal smelters) based on satellite observations of NO2 combined with meteorological wind fields.
Zi Huang, Jiaoyue Wang, Longfei Bing, Yijiao Qiu, Rui Guo, Ying Yu, Mingjing Ma, Le Niu, Dan Tong, Robbie M. Andrew, Pierre Friedlingstein, Josep G. Canadell, Fengming Xi, and Zhu Liu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-203, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-203, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
This is about global and regional cement process carbon emission and CO2 uptake calculation from 1930 to 2019. The global cement production is still rising to 4.4 Gt, causing processing carbon emission 1.81 Gt (95 % CI: 1.75–1.88 Gt CO2) in 2021. Plus, in 2021, cement’s carbon accumulated uptake (22.9 Gt, 95 % CI: 19.6–22.6 Gt CO2) has offset 55.2 % of cement process CO2 emission (41.5 Gt, 95 % CI: 38.7–47.1 Gt CO2) since 1930.
Monica Crippa, Diego Guizzardi, Tim Butler, Terry Keating, Rosa Wu, Jacek Kaminski, Jeroen Kuenen, Junichi Kurokawa, Satoru Chatani, Tazuko Morikawa, George Pouliot, Jacinthe Racine, Michael D. Moran, Zbigniew Klimont, Patrick M. Manseau, Rabab Mashayekhi, Barron H. Henderson, Steven J. Smith, Harrison Suchyta, Marilena Muntean, Efisio Solazzo, Manjola Banja, Edwin Schaaf, Federico Pagani, Jung-Hun Woo, Jinseok Kim, Fabio Monforti-Ferrario, Enrico Pisoni, Junhua Zhang, David Niemi, Mourad Sassi, Tabish Ansari, and Kristen Foley
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2667–2694, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study responds to the global and regional atmospheric modelling community's need for a mosaic of air pollutant emissions with global coverage, long time series, spatially distributed data at a high time resolution, and a high sectoral resolution in order to enhance the understanding of transboundary air pollution. The mosaic approach to integrating official regional emission inventories with a global inventory based on a consistent methodology ensures policy-relevant results.
Wenjun Tang, Junmei He, Jingwen Qi, and Kun Yang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-199, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-199, 2023
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we have developed a dense station-based long-term dataset of daily surface solar radiation in China with high-accuracy. The dataset consists of estimates of global, direct and diffuse radiation at the 2473 meteorological stations during 1950s–2021. Validation indicates that our station-based radiation dataset clearly outperforms the satellite-based radiation products. Our dataset will contribute to climate change research and solar energy applications in the future.
Piers M. Forster, Christopher J. Smith, Tristram Walsh, William F. Lamb, Robin Lamboll, Mathias Hauser, Aurélien Ribes, Debbie Rosen, Nathan Gillett, Matthew D. Palmer, Joeri Rogelj, Karina von Schuckmann, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Blair Trewin, Xuebin Zhang, Myles Allen, Robbie Andrew, Arlene Birt, Alex Borger, Tim Boyer, Jiddu A. Broersma, Lijing Cheng, Frank Dentener, Pierre Friedlingstein, José M. Gutiérrez, Johannes Gütschow, Bradley Hall, Masayoshi Ishii, Stuart Jenkins, Xin Lan, June-Yi Lee, Colin Morice, Christopher Kadow, John Kennedy, Rachel Killick, Jan C. Minx, Vaishali Naik, Glen P. Peters, Anna Pirani, Julia Pongratz, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Sophie Szopa, Peter Thorne, Robert Rohde, Maisa Rojas Corradi, Dominik Schumacher, Russell Vose, Kirsten Zickfeld, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, and Panmao Zhai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2295–2327, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2295-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2295-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This is a critical decade for climate action, but there is no annual tracking of the level of human-induced warming. We build on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change assessment reports that are authoritative but published infrequently to create a set of key global climate indicators that can be tracked through time. Our hope is that this becomes an important annual publication that policymakers, media, scientists and the public can refer to.
Shengyue Li, Shuxiao Wang, Qingru Wu, Yanning Zhang, Daiwei Ouyang, Haotian Zheng, Licong Han, Xionghui Qiu, Yifan Wen, Min Liu, Yueqi Jiang, Dejia Yin, Kaiyun Liu, Bin Zhao, Shaojun Zhang, Ye Wu, and Jiming Hao
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2279–2294, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2279-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2279-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study compiled China's emission inventory of air pollutants and CO2 during 2005–2021 (ABaCAS-EI v2.0) based on unified emission-source framework. The emission trends and its drivers are analyzed. Key sectors and regions with higher synergistic reduction potential of air pollutants and CO2 are identified. Future control measures are suggested. The dataset and analyses provide insights into the synergistic reduction of air pollutants and CO2 emissions for China and other developing countries.
Wouter B. Mol, Wouter H. Knap, and Chiel C. van Heerwaarden
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2139–2151, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2139-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2139-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We describe a dataset of detailed measurements of sunlight reaching the surface, recorded at a rate of one measurement per second for 10 years. The dataset includes detailed information on direct and scattered sunlight; classifications and statistics of variability; and observations of clouds, atmospheric composition, and wind. The dataset can be used to study how the atmosphere influences sunlight variability and to validate models that aim to predict this variability with greater accuracy.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Chunjing Qiu, Matthew J. McGrath, Philippe Peylin, Glen P. Peters, Philippe Ciais, Rona L. Thompson, Aki Tsuruta, Dominik Brunner, Matthias Kuhnert, Bradley Matthews, Paul I. Palmer, Oksana Tarasova, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, David Bastviken, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Wilfried Winiwarter, Giuseppe Etiope, Tuula Aalto, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Vladislav Bastrikov, Antoine Berchet, Patrick Brockmann, Giancarlo Ciotoli, Giulia Conchedda, Monica Crippa, Frank Dentener, Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink, Diego Guizzardi, Dirk Günther, Jean-Matthieu Haussaire, Sander Houweling, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Massaer Kouyate, Adrian Leip, Antti Leppänen, Emanuele Lugato, Manon Maisonnier, Alistair J. Manning, Tiina Markkanen, Joe McNorton, Marilena Muntean, Gabriel D. Oreggioni, Prabir K. Patra, Lucia Perugini, Isabelle Pison, Maarit T. Raivonen, Marielle Saunois, Arjo J. Segers, Pete Smith, Efisio Solazzo, Hanqin Tian, Francesco N. Tubiello, Timo Vesala, Guido R. van der Werf, Chris Wilson, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1197–1268, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study updates the state-of-the-art scientific overview of CH4 and N2O emissions in the EU27 and UK in Petrescu et al. (2021a). Yearly updates are needed to improve the different respective approaches and to inform on the development of formal verification systems. It integrates the most recent emission inventories, process-based model and regional/global inversions, comparing them with UNFCCC national GHG inventories, in support to policy to facilitate real-time verification procedures.
Akash Biswal, Vikas Singh, Leeza Malik, Geetam Tiwari, Khaiwal Ravindra, and Suman Mor
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 661–680, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-661-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-661-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents detailed emission estimates of on-road traffic exhaust emissions of nine major pollutants for Delhi. We use advanced traffic data and emission factors as a function of speed to estimate emissions for each hour and 100 m × 100 m spatial resolution. We examine the source contribution according to the vehicle, fuel, road and Euro types to identify the most polluting vehicles. These data are useful for high-resolution air quality modelling for developing suitable strategies.
Auke M. van der Woude, Remco de Kok, Naomi Smith, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Santiago Botía, Ute Karstens, Linda M. J. Kooijmans, Gerbrand Koren, Harro A. J. Meijer, Gert-Jan Steeneveld, Ida Storm, Ingrid Super, Hubertus A. Scheeren, Alex Vermeulen, and Wouter Peters
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 579–605, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-579-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-579-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To monitor the progress towards the CO2 emission goals set out in the Paris Agreement, the European Union requires an independent validation of emitted CO2. For this validation, atmospheric measurements of CO2 can be used, together with first-guess estimates of CO2 emissions and uptake. To quickly inform end users, it is imperative that this happens in near real-time. To aid these efforts, we create estimates of European CO2 exchange at high resolution in near real time.
David F. Pollard, Frank Hase, Mahesh Kumar Sha, Darko Dubravica, Carlos Alberti, and Dan Smale
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5427–5437, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5427-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5427-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We describe measurements made in Antarctica using an EM27/SUN, a near-infrared, portable, low-resolution spectrometer from which we can retrieve the average atmospheric concentration of several greenhouse gases. We show that these measurements are reliable and comparable to other, similar ground-based measurements. Comparisons to the ESA's Sentinel-5 precursor (S5P) satellite demonstrate the usefulness of these data for satellite validation.
Giacomo Grassi, Giulia Conchedda, Sandro Federici, Raul Abad Viñas, Anu Korosuo, Joana Melo, Simone Rossi, Marieke Sandker, Zoltan Somogyi, Matteo Vizzarri, and Francesco N. Tubiello
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4643-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4643-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Despite increasing attention on the role of land use CO2 fluxes in climate change mitigation, there are large differences in available databases. Here we present the most updated and complete compilation of land use CO2 data based on country submissions to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and explain differences with other datasets. Our dataset brings clarity of land use CO2 fluxes and helps track country progress under the Paris Agreement.
Cited articles
Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M.,
Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Monga, R.,
Moore, S., Murray, D. G., Steiner, B., Tucker, P., Vasudevan, V., Warden, P.,
Wicke, M., Yu, Y., and Zheng, X.: TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale
Machine Learning, in: 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and
Implementation (OSDI 16), USENIX Association, Savannah, GA, 265–283,
https://www.usenix.org/conference/osdi16/technical-sessions/presentation/abadi (last access: 26 March 2022),
2016. a
Aschbacher, J.: ESA's earth observation strategy and Copernicus, in:
Satellite earth observations and their impact on society and policy,
Springer, Singapore, 81–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3713-9_5, 2017. a
Bailey, H., Brookes, K. L., and Thompson, P. M.: Assessing environmental
impacts of offshore wind farms: lessons learned and recommendations for the
future, Aquatic Biosystems, 10, 8, https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-9063-10-8, 2014. a, b
Baumhoer, C. A., Dietz, A. J., Kneisel, C., and Kuenzer, C.: Automated
Extraction of Antarctic Glacier and Ice Shelf Fronts from Sentinel-1 Imagery
Using Deep Learning, Remote Sens., 11, 2529, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212529, 2019. a
Bazzi, H., Ienco, D., Baghdadi, N., Zribi, M., and Demarez, V.: Distilling
Before Refine: Spatio-Temporal Transfer Learning for Mapping Irrigated Areas
Using Sentinel-1 Time Series, IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 17,
1909–1913, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2960625, 2020. a
Belenguer-Plomer, M. A., Tanase, M. A., Chuvieco, E., and Bovolo, F.: CNN-based
burned area mapping using radar and optical data, Remote Sens.
Environ., 260, 112468, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112468, 2021. a
Bergström, L., Kautsky, L., Malm, T., Rosenberg, R., Wahlberg, M., Capetillo,
N. Å., and Wilhelmsson, D.: Effects of offshore wind farms on marine
wildlife – a generalized impact assessment, Environ. Res.
Lett., 9, 034012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034012, 2014. a, b
Boeck, M., Voinov, S., Keim, S., Volkmann, R., Langbein, M., and Mühlbauer,
M.: Frontend Libraries for DLR UKIS (Map) Applications, Version v8.0.1, Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5835895, 2022. a
Cavazzi, S. and Dutton, A.: An Offshore Wind Energy Geographic Information
System (OWE-GIS) for assessment of the UK's offshore wind energy potential,
Renew. Energ., 87, 212–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.021, 2016. a
COP26: Global coal to clean power transition statement,
https://ukcop26.org/global-coal-to-clean-power-transition-statement/ (last access: 26 March 2022),
2021. a
Cué La Rosa, L. E., Happ, P. N., and Feitosa, R. Q.: Dense Fully Convolutional
Networks for Crop Recognition from Multitemporal SAR Image Sequences, in:
IGARSS 2018 – 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium, 7460–7463, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8517995, 2018. a
Dirscherl, M., Dietz, A. J., Kneisel, C., and Kuenzer, C.: A Novel Method for
Automated Supraglacial Lake Mapping in Antarctica Using Sentinel-1 SAR
Imagery and Deep Learning, Remote Sens., 13, 197, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13020197,
2021. a, b
Drewitt, A. L. and Langston, R. H. W.: Assessing the impacts of wind farms on
birds, Ibis, 148, 29–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00516.x, 2006. a, b
Esteban, M. D., Diez, J. J., López, J. S., and Negro, V.: Why offshore wind
energy?, Renew. Energ., 36, 444–450, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.009,
2011. a
European Commission: An EU Strategy to harness the potential of offshore renewable energy
for a climate neutral future,
https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/offshore_renewable_energy_strategy.pdf (last access: 26 March 2022),
2020. a
Fox, A., Desholm, M., Kahlert, J., Christensen, T. K., and Krag Petersen, I.:
Information needs to support environmental impact assessment of the effects
of European marine offshore wind farms on birds, Ibis, 148, 129–144,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00510.x, 2006. a, b
Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., and Moore,
R.: Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone,
Remote Sens. Environ., 202, 18–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031,
2017. a
Gusatu, L. F., Yamu, C., Zuidema, C., and Faaij, A.: A spatial analysis of the
potentials for offshore wind farm locations in the North Sea region:
Challenges and opportunities, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.,
9, 96, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020096, 2020. a, b, c, d
Gușatu, L., Menegon, S., Depellegrin, D., Zuidema, C., Faaij, A., and Yamu,
C.: Spatial and temporal analysis of cumulative environmental effects of
offshore wind farms in the North Sea basin, Sci. Rep., 11, 10125,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89537-1, 2021. a, b
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J.: Deep Residual Learning for
Image Recognition, in: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), 770–778, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90, 2016. a
Henderson, A. R., Morgan, C., Smith, B., Sørensen, H. C., Barthelmie, R. J.,
and Boesmans, B.: Offshore Wind Energy in Europe – A Review of the
State-of-the-Art, Wind Energy, 6, 35–52, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.82, 2003. a, b
Hoeser, T. and Kuenzer, C.: Object Detection and Image Segmentation with Deep
Learning on Earth Observation Data: A Review – Part I: Evolution and Recent
Trends, Remote Sens., 12, 1667, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101667, 2020. a, b
Hoeser, T. and Kuenzer, C.: DeepOWT: A global offshore wind turbine data set, Zenodo [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5933967, 2022b. a, b
Hoeser, T., Bachofer, F., and Kuenzer, C.: Object Detection and Image
Segmentation with Deep Learning on Earth Observation Data: A Review – Part
II: Applications, Remote Sens., 12, 3053, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12183053, 2020. a, b
Johnson, A. F., Dawson, C. L., Conners, M. G., Locke, C. C., and Maxwell,
S. M.: Offshore renewables need an experimental mindset, Science, 376,
361–361, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo7924, 2022. a
Kang, M., Ji, K., Leng, X., and Lin, Z.: Contextual Region-Based Convolutional
Neural Network with Multilayer Fusion for SAR Ship Detection, Remote Sens.,
9, 860, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080860, 2017. a
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. E.: ImageNet Classification with
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, 1097–1105,
http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4824-imagenet-classification-with-deep-convolutional-neural-networks.pdf (last access: 13 January 2022),
2012. a
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. E.: ImageNet Classification with
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, Commun. ACM, 60, 84–90,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386, 2017. a
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G.: Deep Learning, Nature, 521, 436–444,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539, 2015. a, b
Loshchilov, I. and Hutter, F.: SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm
Restarts, arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1608.03983, 2016. a
Ma, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, Y., Yin, G., and Johnson, B. A.: Deep learning
in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review, ISPRS J.
Photogramm., 152, 166–177,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015, 2019. a
Majidi Nezhad, M., Groppi, D., Marzialetti, P., Fusilli, L., Laneve, G.,
Cumo, F., and Garcia, D. A.: Wind energy potential analysis using Sentinel-1
satellite: A review and a case study on Mediterranean islands, Renew.
Sust. Energ. Rev., 109, 499–513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.059,
2019. a
Mullissa, A. G., Persello, C., and Tolpekin, V.: Fully Convolutional Networks
for Multi-Temporal SAR Image Classification, in: IGARSS 2018–2018 IEEE
International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 6635–6638,
https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8518780, 2018. a
Opitz, J. and Burst, S.: Macro F1 and Macro F1, arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1911.03347, 2019. a
Padilla, R., Passos, W. L., Dias, T. L. B., Netto, S. L., and da Silva, E.
A. B.: A Comparative Analysis of Object Detection Metrics with a Companion
Open-Source Toolkit, Electronics, 10, 279, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030279,
2021. a
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J.,
Carvalhais, N., and Prabhat: Deep learning and process understanding for
data-driven Earth system science, Nature, 566, 195–204, 2019. a
Rodrigues, S., Restrepo, C., Kontos, E., Teixeira Pinto, R., and Bauer, P.:
Trends of offshore wind projects, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.,
49, 1114–1135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.092, 2015. a, b
Slavik, K., Lemmen, C., Zhang, W., Kerimoglu, O., Klingbeil, K., and Wirtz,
K. W.: The large-scale impact of offshore wind farm structures on pelagic
primary productivity in the southern North Sea, Hydrobiologia, 845, 35–53,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3653-5, 2019. a, b
Torres, R., Snoeij, P., Geudtner, D., Bibby, D., Davidson, M., Attema, E.,
Potin, P., Rommen, B., Floury, N., Brown, M., Traver, I. N., Deghaye, P.,
Duesmann, B., Rosich, B., Miranda, N., Bruno, C., L'Abbate, M., Croci, R.,
Pietropaolo, A., Huchler, M., and Rostan, F.: GMES Sentinel-1 mission, Remote
Sens. Environ., 120, 9–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.028, 2012. a
Virtanen, E., Lappalainen, J., Nurmi, M., Viitasalo, M., Tikanmäki, M.,
Heinonen, J., Atlaskin, E., Kallasvuo, M., Tikkanen, H., and Moilanen, A.:
Balancing profitability of energy production, societal impacts and
biodiversity in offshore wind farm design, Renew. Sust. Energ.
Rev., 158, 112087, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112087, 2022. a
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T.,
Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van
der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson,
A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, İ., Feng,
Y., Moore, E. W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R.,
Henriksen, I., Quintero, E. A., Harris, C. R., Archibald, A. M., Ribeiro,
A. H., Pedregosa, F., van Mulbregt, P., and SciPy 1.0 Contributors:
SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,
Nature Methods, 17, 261–272, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2, 2020. a
Wever, L., Krause, G., and Buck, B. H.: Lessons from stakeholder dialogues on
marine aquaculture in offshore wind farms: Perceived potentials, constraints
and research gaps, Mar. Policy, 51, 251–259,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.015, 2015. a, b, c
Wilson, J. C. and Elliott, M.: The habitat-creation potential of offshore wind
farms, Wind Energy, 12, 203–212, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.324, 2009. a, b
Wong, B. A., Thomas, C., and Halpin, P.: Automating offshore infrastructure
extractions using synthetic aperture radar and Google Earth Engine, Remote
Sens. Environ., 233, 111412, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111412, 2019. a
Xu, W., Liu, Y., Wu, W., Dong, Y., Lu, W., Liu, Y., Zhao, B., Li, H., and Yang,
R.: Proliferation of offshore wind farms in the North Sea and surrounding
waters revealed by satellite image time series, Renew. Sust.
Energ. Rev., 133, 110167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110167, 2020. a
Zhang, J., Wang, Q., and Su, F.: Automatic extraction of offshore platforms in
single SAR images based on a dual-step-modified model, Sensors, 19, 231, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020231,
2019. a
Zhu, X. X., Montazeri, S., Ali, M., Hua, Y., Wang, Y., Mou, L., Shi, Y., Xu,
F., and Bamler, R.: Deep Learning Meets SAR: Concepts, models, pitfalls, and
perspectives, IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 9, 143–172,
https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2020.3046356, 2021. a
Short summary
The DeepOWT (Deep-learning-derived Offshore Wind Turbines) data set provides offshore wind energy infrastructure locations and their temporal deployment dynamics from July 2016 until June 2021 on a global scale. It differentiates between offshore wind turbines, platforms under construction, and offshore wind farm substations. It is derived by applying deep-learning-based object detection to Sentinel-1 imagery.
The DeepOWT (Deep-learning-derived Offshore Wind Turbines) data set provides offshore wind...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint