Articles | Volume 14, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4251-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4251-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
DeepOWT: a global offshore wind turbine data set derived with deep learning from Sentinel-1 data
German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, Germany
Stefanie Feuerstein
German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, Germany
Claudia Kuenzer
German Remote Sensing Data Center (DFD), German Aerospace Center (DLR), 82234 Wessling, Germany
Department of Remote Sensing, Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany
Related authors
Celia A. Baumhoer, Amy B. Morgan, Xinyu Hou, Jowan L. Fromentin, Thorsten Hoeser, Andreas J. Dietz, Andrew Markham, Laura A. Stevens, and Claudia Kuenzer
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-758, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-758, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Researchers from DLR and University Oxford created Shelf-Bench, a dataset to help AI track Antarctic ice shelf edges using satellite radar images (1992–2021). Testing five AI models revealed ice shelf delineation remains challenging and requires new model developments. This public benchmark will help researchers build better tools for monitoring ice front changes, detecting iceberg calving events, supporting operational logistics, and generating up-to-date continental maps.
Celia A. Baumhoer, Amy B. Morgan, Xinyu Hou, Jowan L. Fromentin, Thorsten Hoeser, Andreas J. Dietz, Andrew Markham, Laura A. Stevens, and Claudia Kuenzer
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-758, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-758, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Researchers from DLR and University Oxford created Shelf-Bench, a dataset to help AI track Antarctic ice shelf edges using satellite radar images (1992–2021). Testing five AI models revealed ice shelf delineation remains challenging and requires new model developments. This public benchmark will help researchers build better tools for monitoring ice front changes, detecting iceberg calving events, supporting operational logistics, and generating up-to-date continental maps.
Samuel Schilling, Tobias Bolch, Andreas Dietz, Rebbeca Jean Herman, and Claudia Kuenzer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6280, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6280, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
Snow stored in winter snowpacks supplies water to rivers that millions of people depend on. As warming reduces snow amounts, we studied whether melting snow still matters for river flow. Using long records from river basins on four continents, and cause and effect analysis, we found that in some basins melting snow can become more important for river flow even when less snow is available.
Mariel C. Dirscherl, Andreas J. Dietz, and Claudia Kuenzer
The Cryosphere, 15, 5205–5226, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5205-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-5205-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We provide novel insight into the temporal evolution of supraglacial lakes across six major Antarctic ice shelves in 2015–2021. For Antarctic Peninsula ice shelves, we observe extensive meltwater ponding during the 2019–2020 and 2020–2021 summers. Over East Antarctica, lakes were widespread during 2016–2019 and at a minimum in 2020–2021. We investigate environmental controls, revealing lake ponding to be coupled to atmospheric modes, the near-surface climate and the local glaciological setting.
Celia A. Baumhoer, Andreas J. Dietz, Christof Kneisel, Heiko Paeth, and Claudia Kuenzer
The Cryosphere, 15, 2357–2381, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2357-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-2357-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present a record of circum-Antarctic glacier and ice shelf front change over the last two decades in combination with potential environmental variables forcing frontal retreat. Along the Antarctic coastline, glacier and ice shelf front retreat dominated between 1997–2008 and advance between 2009–2018. Decreasing sea ice days, intense snowmelt, weakening easterly winds, and relative changes in sea surface temperature were identified as enabling factors for glacier and ice shelf front retreat.
Cited articles
Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M.,
Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., Isard, M., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Monga, R.,
Moore, S., Murray, D. G., Steiner, B., Tucker, P., Vasudevan, V., Warden, P.,
Wicke, M., Yu, Y., and Zheng, X.: TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale
Machine Learning, in: 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and
Implementation (OSDI 16), USENIX Association, Savannah, GA, 265–283,
https://www.usenix.org/conference/osdi16/technical-sessions/presentation/abadi (last access: 26 March 2022),
2016. a
Aschbacher, J.: ESA's earth observation strategy and Copernicus, in:
Satellite earth observations and their impact on society and policy,
Springer, Singapore, 81–86, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3713-9_5, 2017. a
Bailey, H., Brookes, K. L., and Thompson, P. M.: Assessing environmental
impacts of offshore wind farms: lessons learned and recommendations for the
future, Aquatic Biosystems, 10, 8, https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-9063-10-8, 2014. a, b
Baumhoer, C. A., Dietz, A. J., Kneisel, C., and Kuenzer, C.: Automated
Extraction of Antarctic Glacier and Ice Shelf Fronts from Sentinel-1 Imagery
Using Deep Learning, Remote Sens., 11, 2529, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212529, 2019. a
Bazzi, H., Ienco, D., Baghdadi, N., Zribi, M., and Demarez, V.: Distilling
Before Refine: Spatio-Temporal Transfer Learning for Mapping Irrigated Areas
Using Sentinel-1 Time Series, IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 17,
1909–1913, https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2960625, 2020. a
Belenguer-Plomer, M. A., Tanase, M. A., Chuvieco, E., and Bovolo, F.: CNN-based
burned area mapping using radar and optical data, Remote Sens.
Environ., 260, 112468, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112468, 2021. a
Bergström, L., Kautsky, L., Malm, T., Rosenberg, R., Wahlberg, M., Capetillo,
N. Å., and Wilhelmsson, D.: Effects of offshore wind farms on marine
wildlife – a generalized impact assessment, Environ. Res.
Lett., 9, 034012, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/3/034012, 2014. a, b
Boeck, M., Voinov, S., Keim, S., Volkmann, R., Langbein, M., and Mühlbauer,
M.: Frontend Libraries for DLR UKIS (Map) Applications, Version v8.0.1, Zenodo [code],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5835895, 2022. a
Cavazzi, S. and Dutton, A.: An Offshore Wind Energy Geographic Information
System (OWE-GIS) for assessment of the UK's offshore wind energy potential,
Renew. Energ., 87, 212–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.09.021, 2016. a
COP26: Global coal to clean power transition statement,
https://ukcop26.org/global-coal-to-clean-power-transition-statement/ (last access: 26 March 2022),
2021. a
Cué La Rosa, L. E., Happ, P. N., and Feitosa, R. Q.: Dense Fully Convolutional
Networks for Crop Recognition from Multitemporal SAR Image Sequences, in:
IGARSS 2018 – 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Symposium, 7460–7463, https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8517995, 2018. a
Dirscherl, M., Dietz, A. J., Kneisel, C., and Kuenzer, C.: A Novel Method for
Automated Supraglacial Lake Mapping in Antarctica Using Sentinel-1 SAR
Imagery and Deep Learning, Remote Sens., 13, 197, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13020197,
2021. a, b
Drewitt, A. L. and Langston, R. H. W.: Assessing the impacts of wind farms on
birds, Ibis, 148, 29–42, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00516.x, 2006. a, b
Esteban, M. D., Diez, J. J., López, J. S., and Negro, V.: Why offshore wind
energy?, Renew. Energ., 36, 444–450, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.07.009,
2011. a
European Commission: An EU Strategy to harness the potential of offshore renewable energy
for a climate neutral future,
https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/offshore_renewable_energy_strategy.pdf (last access: 26 March 2022),
2020. a
Fox, A., Desholm, M., Kahlert, J., Christensen, T. K., and Krag Petersen, I.:
Information needs to support environmental impact assessment of the effects
of European marine offshore wind farms on birds, Ibis, 148, 129–144,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00510.x, 2006. a, b
Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., and Moore,
R.: Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone,
Remote Sens. Environ., 202, 18–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031,
2017. a
Gusatu, L. F., Yamu, C., Zuidema, C., and Faaij, A.: A spatial analysis of the
potentials for offshore wind farm locations in the North Sea region:
Challenges and opportunities, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.,
9, 96, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020096, 2020. a, b, c, d
Gușatu, L., Menegon, S., Depellegrin, D., Zuidema, C., Faaij, A., and Yamu,
C.: Spatial and temporal analysis of cumulative environmental effects of
offshore wind farms in the North Sea basin, Sci. Rep., 11, 10125,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89537-1, 2021. a, b
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., and Sun, J.: Deep Residual Learning for
Image Recognition, in: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern
Recognition (CVPR), 770–778, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90, 2016. a
Henderson, A. R., Morgan, C., Smith, B., Sørensen, H. C., Barthelmie, R. J.,
and Boesmans, B.: Offshore Wind Energy in Europe – A Review of the
State-of-the-Art, Wind Energy, 6, 35–52, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.82, 2003. a, b
Hoeser, T. and Kuenzer, C.: Object Detection and Image Segmentation with Deep
Learning on Earth Observation Data: A Review – Part I: Evolution and Recent
Trends, Remote Sens., 12, 1667, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12101667, 2020. a, b
Hoeser, T. and Kuenzer, C.: DeepOWT: A global offshore wind turbine data set, Zenodo [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5933967, 2022b. a, b
Hoeser, T., Bachofer, F., and Kuenzer, C.: Object Detection and Image
Segmentation with Deep Learning on Earth Observation Data: A Review – Part
II: Applications, Remote Sens., 12, 3053, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12183053, 2020. a, b
Johnson, A. F., Dawson, C. L., Conners, M. G., Locke, C. C., and Maxwell,
S. M.: Offshore renewables need an experimental mindset, Science, 376,
361–361, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo7924, 2022. a
Kang, M., Ji, K., Leng, X., and Lin, Z.: Contextual Region-Based Convolutional
Neural Network with Multilayer Fusion for SAR Ship Detection, Remote Sens.,
9, 860, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9080860, 2017. a
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. E.: ImageNet Classification with
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, 1097–1105,
http://papers.nips.cc/paper/4824-imagenet-classification-with-deep-convolutional-neural-networks.pdf (last access: 13 January 2022),
2012. a
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G. E.: ImageNet Classification with
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, Commun. ACM, 60, 84–90,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3065386, 2017. a
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G.: Deep Learning, Nature, 521, 436–444,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539, 2015. a, b
Loshchilov, I. and Hutter, F.: SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm
Restarts, arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1608.03983, 2016. a
Ma, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, Y., Yin, G., and Johnson, B. A.: Deep learning
in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review, ISPRS J.
Photogramm., 152, 166–177,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015, 2019. a
Majidi Nezhad, M., Groppi, D., Marzialetti, P., Fusilli, L., Laneve, G.,
Cumo, F., and Garcia, D. A.: Wind energy potential analysis using Sentinel-1
satellite: A review and a case study on Mediterranean islands, Renew.
Sust. Energ. Rev., 109, 499–513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.059,
2019. a
Mullissa, A. G., Persello, C., and Tolpekin, V.: Fully Convolutional Networks
for Multi-Temporal SAR Image Classification, in: IGARSS 2018–2018 IEEE
International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 6635–6638,
https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2018.8518780, 2018. a
Opitz, J. and Burst, S.: Macro F1 and Macro F1, arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1911.03347, 2019. a
Padilla, R., Passos, W. L., Dias, T. L. B., Netto, S. L., and da Silva, E.
A. B.: A Comparative Analysis of Object Detection Metrics with a Companion
Open-Source Toolkit, Electronics, 10, 279, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10030279,
2021. a
Reichstein, M., Camps-Valls, G., Stevens, B., Jung, M., Denzler, J.,
Carvalhais, N., and Prabhat: Deep learning and process understanding for
data-driven Earth system science, Nature, 566, 195–204, 2019. a
Rodrigues, S., Restrepo, C., Kontos, E., Teixeira Pinto, R., and Bauer, P.:
Trends of offshore wind projects, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.,
49, 1114–1135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.092, 2015. a, b
Slavik, K., Lemmen, C., Zhang, W., Kerimoglu, O., Klingbeil, K., and Wirtz,
K. W.: The large-scale impact of offshore wind farm structures on pelagic
primary productivity in the southern North Sea, Hydrobiologia, 845, 35–53,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3653-5, 2019. a, b
Torres, R., Snoeij, P., Geudtner, D., Bibby, D., Davidson, M., Attema, E.,
Potin, P., Rommen, B., Floury, N., Brown, M., Traver, I. N., Deghaye, P.,
Duesmann, B., Rosich, B., Miranda, N., Bruno, C., L'Abbate, M., Croci, R.,
Pietropaolo, A., Huchler, M., and Rostan, F.: GMES Sentinel-1 mission, Remote
Sens. Environ., 120, 9–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.028, 2012. a
Virtanen, E., Lappalainen, J., Nurmi, M., Viitasalo, M., Tikanmäki, M.,
Heinonen, J., Atlaskin, E., Kallasvuo, M., Tikkanen, H., and Moilanen, A.:
Balancing profitability of energy production, societal impacts and
biodiversity in offshore wind farm design, Renew. Sust. Energ.
Rev., 158, 112087, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112087, 2022. a
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T.,
Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van
der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson,
A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, İ., Feng,
Y., Moore, E. W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R.,
Henriksen, I., Quintero, E. A., Harris, C. R., Archibald, A. M., Ribeiro,
A. H., Pedregosa, F., van Mulbregt, P., and SciPy 1.0 Contributors:
SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python,
Nature Methods, 17, 261–272, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2, 2020. a
Wever, L., Krause, G., and Buck, B. H.: Lessons from stakeholder dialogues on
marine aquaculture in offshore wind farms: Perceived potentials, constraints
and research gaps, Mar. Policy, 51, 251–259,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.08.015, 2015. a, b, c
Wilson, J. C. and Elliott, M.: The habitat-creation potential of offshore wind
farms, Wind Energy, 12, 203–212, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.324, 2009. a, b
Wong, B. A., Thomas, C., and Halpin, P.: Automating offshore infrastructure
extractions using synthetic aperture radar and Google Earth Engine, Remote
Sens. Environ., 233, 111412, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111412, 2019. a
Xu, W., Liu, Y., Wu, W., Dong, Y., Lu, W., Liu, Y., Zhao, B., Li, H., and Yang,
R.: Proliferation of offshore wind farms in the North Sea and surrounding
waters revealed by satellite image time series, Renew. Sust.
Energ. Rev., 133, 110167, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110167, 2020. a
Zhang, J., Wang, Q., and Su, F.: Automatic extraction of offshore platforms in
single SAR images based on a dual-step-modified model, Sensors, 19, 231, https://doi.org/10.3390/s19020231,
2019. a
Zhu, X. X., Montazeri, S., Ali, M., Hua, Y., Wang, Y., Mou, L., Shi, Y., Xu,
F., and Bamler, R.: Deep Learning Meets SAR: Concepts, models, pitfalls, and
perspectives, IEEE Geosci. Remote S., 9, 143–172,
https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2020.3046356, 2021. a
Short summary
The DeepOWT (Deep-learning-derived Offshore Wind Turbines) data set provides offshore wind energy infrastructure locations and their temporal deployment dynamics from July 2016 until June 2021 on a global scale. It differentiates between offshore wind turbines, platforms under construction, and offshore wind farm substations. It is derived by applying deep-learning-based object detection to Sentinel-1 imagery.
The DeepOWT (Deep-learning-derived Offshore Wind Turbines) data set provides offshore wind...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint