Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-683-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-683-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Soil moisture and matric potential – an open field comparison of sensor systems
Conrad Jackisch
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Chair of Hydrology, Institute of Water Resources and River Basin Management, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Kaiserstr. 12, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
current address: Department of Landscape Ecology and Environmental Systems Analysis, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Kai Germer
Department of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Thomas Graeff
Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
Department IV 2.1, Umweltbundesamt (Federal Environment Agency), Wörlitzer Platz 1, 06844 Dessau-Roßlau, Germany
Ines Andrä
Department of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Katrin Schulz
Department of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Marcus Schiedung
Department of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Jaqueline Haller-Jans
Department of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Jonas Schneider
Department of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Julia Jaquemotte
Department of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Philipp Helmer
Department of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Leander Lotz
Department of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Andreas Bauer
Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
Irene Hahn
Institute of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
Martin Šanda
Department of Irrigation, Drainage and Landscape Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thakurova 7, 166 29, Prague 6, Czech Republic
Monika Kumpan
Institute for Land and Water Management Research, Federal Agency for Water Management, 3252 Petzenkirchen, Austria
Johann Dorner
Institute for Land and Water Management Research, Federal Agency for Water Management, 3252 Petzenkirchen, Austria
Gerrit de Rooij
Department of Soil System Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, Theodor-Lieser-Str. 4, 06120 Halle, Germany
Stefan Wessel-Bothe
ecoTech Umwelt-Meßsysteme GmbH, Nikolausstr. 7, 53129 Bonn, Germany
Lorenz Kottmann
Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut, Bundesallee 58, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
Siegfried Schittenhelm
Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut, Bundesallee 58, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany
Wolfgang Durner
Department of Soil Science and Soil Physics, Institute of Geoecology, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Langer Kamp 19c, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany
Related authors
Anita Alexandra Sanchez, Maximilian P. Lau, Sean Adam, Sabrina Hedrich, and Conrad Jackisch
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4092, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4092, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Abandoned mine systems release contaminants through episodic connectivity rather than steady seepage. At the Reiche Zeche mine, we show that low flow and pre-flush phases accumulate solutes that are rapidly exported during short-lived reconnection events. These hot moments dominate annual metal loads, highlighting the need for event-sensitive monitoring and targeted, near-source remediation strategies.
Tobias Karl David Weber, Lutz Weihermüller, Attila Nemes, Michel Bechtold, Aurore Degré, Efstathios Diamantopoulos, Simone Fatichi, Vilim Filipović, Surya Gupta, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Daniel R. Hirmas, Conrad Jackisch, Quirijn de Jong van Lier, John Koestel, Peter Lehmann, Toby R. Marthews, Budiman Minasny, Holger Pagel, Martine van der Ploeg, Shahab Aldin Shojaeezadeh, Simon Fiil Svane, Brigitta Szabó, Harry Vereecken, Anne Verhoef, Michael Young, Yijian Zeng, Yonggen Zhang, and Sara Bonetti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3391–3433, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are used to predict parameters of models describing the hydraulic properties of soils. The appropriateness of these predictions critically relies on the nature of the datasets for training the PTFs and the physical comprehensiveness of the models. This roadmap paper is addressed to PTF developers and users and critically reflects the utility and future of PTFs. To this end, we present a manifesto aiming at a paradigm shift in PTF research.
Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Conrad Jackisch, Wolfgang Durner, Kai Germer, Sascha C. Iden, Janis Kreiselmeier, Frederic Leuther, Johanna C. Metzger, Mahyar Naseri, and Andre Peters
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4417–4432, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4417-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4417-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The article describes a collection of 572 data sets of soil water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data measured with state-of-the-art laboratory methods. Furthermore, the data collection contains basic soil properties such as soil texture and organic carbon content. We expect that the data will be useful for various important purposes, for example, the development of soil hydraulic property models and related pedotransfer functions.
Conrad Jackisch, Sibylle K. Hassler, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Theresa Blume, Hjalmar Laudon, Hilary McMillan, Patricia Saco, and Loes van Schaik
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5277–5285, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5277-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5277-2021, 2021
Gerrit Huibert de Rooij
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 6921–6950, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6921-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6921-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Water flows ever more slowly in soil when the soil dries out. This can be described by the conductivity curve that accounts for water filling up small spaces, sticking to grains in films, and water vapour diffusion. This paper introduces a relatively simple model for this curve that needs one fewer parameter than most others. It works well for most soils, but some need the extra parameter. The paper also presents a computer program to determine the parameter values of this and other models.
Anita Alexandra Sanchez, Maximilian P. Lau, Sean Adam, Sabrina Hedrich, and Conrad Jackisch
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4092, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4092, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Abandoned mine systems release contaminants through episodic connectivity rather than steady seepage. At the Reiche Zeche mine, we show that low flow and pre-flush phases accumulate solutes that are rapidly exported during short-lived reconnection events. These hot moments dominate annual metal loads, highlighting the need for event-sensitive monitoring and targeted, near-source remediation strategies.
Jiri Kocum, Jan Haidl, Ondrej Gebousky, Kristyna Falatkova, Vaclav Sipek, Martin Sanda, Natalie Orlowski, and Lukas Vlcek
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2863–2880, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2863-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2863-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present a novel method for soil water extraction – circulating-air soil water extraction – together with a newly developed apparatus specifically designed for its purposes. The method has been tested across a range of soil types, demonstrating an accuracy level that matches or surpasses that of conventional extraction techniques. The apparatus is optimized for small-scale, high-precision studies in which an unambiguous determination of the water origin is required.
Asha Nambiar and Gerrit Huibert de Rooij
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-412, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-412, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The way infiltrating water moves in soil affects vegetation as well as groundwater recharge. This flow of soil water is captured by a mathematical function that covers all water contents from very dry to water-saturated. We tested several such functions for different soils and climates to see how model-calculated water fluxes are affected. Luckily, the effects of weather and the soil are much more important than the choice of the mathematical function.
Tobias Karl David Weber, Lutz Weihermüller, Attila Nemes, Michel Bechtold, Aurore Degré, Efstathios Diamantopoulos, Simone Fatichi, Vilim Filipović, Surya Gupta, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Daniel R. Hirmas, Conrad Jackisch, Quirijn de Jong van Lier, John Koestel, Peter Lehmann, Toby R. Marthews, Budiman Minasny, Holger Pagel, Martine van der Ploeg, Shahab Aldin Shojaeezadeh, Simon Fiil Svane, Brigitta Szabó, Harry Vereecken, Anne Verhoef, Michael Young, Yijian Zeng, Yonggen Zhang, and Sara Bonetti
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 3391–3433, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-3391-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Pedotransfer functions (PTFs) are used to predict parameters of models describing the hydraulic properties of soils. The appropriateness of these predictions critically relies on the nature of the datasets for training the PTFs and the physical comprehensiveness of the models. This roadmap paper is addressed to PTF developers and users and critically reflects the utility and future of PTFs. To this end, we present a manifesto aiming at a paradigm shift in PTF research.
Andre Peters, Sascha C. Iden, and Wolfgang Durner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4579–4593, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4579-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4579-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
While various expressions for the water retention curve are commonly compared, the capillary conductivity model proposed by Mualem is widely used but seldom compared to alternatives. We compare four different capillary bundle models in terms of their ability to fully predict the hydraulic conductivity. The Mualem model outperformed the three other models in terms of predictive accuracy. Our findings suggest that the widespread use of the Mualem model is justified.
Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Conrad Jackisch, Wolfgang Durner, Kai Germer, Sascha C. Iden, Janis Kreiselmeier, Frederic Leuther, Johanna C. Metzger, Mahyar Naseri, and Andre Peters
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4417–4432, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4417-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4417-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The article describes a collection of 572 data sets of soil water retention and unsaturated hydraulic conductivity data measured with state-of-the-art laboratory methods. Furthermore, the data collection contains basic soil properties such as soil texture and organic carbon content. We expect that the data will be useful for various important purposes, for example, the development of soil hydraulic property models and related pedotransfer functions.
Benjamin Guillaume, Hanane Aroui Boukbida, Gerben Bakker, Andrzej Bieganowski, Yves Brostaux, Wim Cornelis, Wolfgang Durner, Christian Hartmann, Bo V. Iversen, Mathieu Javaux, Joachim Ingwersen, Krzysztof Lamorski, Axel Lamparter, András Makó, Ana María Mingot Soriano, Ingmar Messing, Attila Nemes, Alexandre Pomes-Bordedebat, Martine van der Ploeg, Tobias Karl David Weber, Lutz Weihermüller, Joost Wellens, and Aurore Degré
SOIL, 9, 365–379, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-365-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-9-365-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Measurements of soil water retention properties play an important role in a variety of societal issues that depend on soil water conditions. However, there is little concern about the consistency of these measurements between laboratories. We conducted an interlaboratory comparison to assess the reproducibility of the measurement of the soil water retention curve. Results highlight the need to harmonize and standardize procedures to improve the description of unsaturated processes in soils.
Andre Peters, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Sascha C. Iden, Martinus Th. van Genuchten, and Wolfgang Durner
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 1565–1582, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1565-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-1565-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The soil hydraulic conductivity function is usually predicted from the water retention curve (WRC) with the requirement of at least one measured conductivity data point for scaling the function. We propose a new scheme of absolute hydraulic conductivity prediction from the WRC without the need of measured conductivity data. Testing the new prediction with independent data shows good results. This scheme can be used when insufficient or no conductivity data are available.
Gerrit Huibert de Rooij
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5849–5858, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5849-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5849-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The way soils capture infiltrating water affects crops and natural vegetation as well as groundwater recharge. This retention of soil water is captured by a mathematical function that covers all water contents from very dry to water-saturated. Unfortunately, data in the dry range are often absent or unreliable. I modified an earlier function to be more robust in the absence of dry-range data, and present a computer program to estimate the parameters of the new function.
Mahyar Naseri, Sascha C. Iden, and Wolfgang Durner
SOIL, 8, 99–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-99-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-8-99-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We simulated stony soils with low to high volumes of rock fragments in 3D using evaporation and multistep unit-gradient experiments. Hydraulic properties of virtual stony soils were identified under a wide range of soil matric potentials. The developed models for scaling the hydraulic conductivity of stony soils were evaluated under unsaturated flow conditions.
Benedikt J. Werner, Oliver J. Lechtenfeld, Andreas Musolff, Gerrit H. de Rooij, Jie Yang, Ralf Gründling, Ulrike Werban, and Jan H. Fleckenstein
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 6067–6086, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6067-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-6067-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Export of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) from riparian zones (RZs) is an important yet poorly understood component of the catchment carbon budget. This study chemically and spatially classifies DOC source zones within a RZ of a small catchment to assess DOC export patterns. Results highlight that DOC export from only a small fraction of the RZ with distinct DOC composition dominates overall DOC export. The application of a spatial, topographic proxy can be used to improve DOC export models.
Conrad Jackisch, Sibylle K. Hassler, Tobias L. Hohenbrink, Theresa Blume, Hjalmar Laudon, Hilary McMillan, Patricia Saco, and Loes van Schaik
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5277–5285, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5277-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5277-2021, 2021
Gerrit Huibert de Rooij, Juliane Mai, and Raneem Madi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 983–1007, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-983-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-983-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The way soils capture infiltrating water affects crops and natural vegetation and groundwater recharge. This retention of soil water is described by a mathematical function that covers all water contents from very dry to water saturated. We combined two existing lines of research to improve the behaviour of a popular function for very dry and very wet conditions. Our new function could handle a wider range of conditions than earlier curves. We provide fits to a wide range of soils.
Severin-Luca Bellè, Asmeret Asefaw Berhe, Frank Hagedorn, Cristina Santin, Marcus Schiedung, Ilja van Meerveld, and Samuel Abiven
Biogeosciences, 18, 1105–1126, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1105-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-1105-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Controls of pyrogenic carbon (PyC) redistribution under rainfall are largely unknown. However, PyC mobility can be substantial after initial rain in post-fire landscapes. We conducted a controlled simulation experiment on plots where PyC was applied on the soil surface. We identified redistribution of PyC by runoff and splash and vertical movement in the soil depending on soil texture and PyC characteristics (material and size). PyC also induced changes in exports of native soil organic carbon.
Cited articles
Bakker, G., van der Ploeg, M. J., de Rooij, G. H., Hoogendam, C. W., Gooren, H. P. A., Huiskes, C., Koopal, L. K., and Kruidhof, H.: New Polymer
Tensiometers: Measuring Matric Pressures Down to the Wilting Point, Vadose Zone J., 6, 196–202, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2006.0110, 2007. a
Bogena, H. R., Huisman, J. A., Schilling, B., Weuthen, A., and Vereecken, H.:
Effective Calibration of Low-Cost Soil Water Content Sensors, Sensors, 17, 208, https://doi.org/10.3390/s17010208, 2017. a, b
Buckingham, E.: Studies on the movement of soil moisture, Bulletin (United
States. Bureau of Soils) No. 38, Washington,
availble at: http://www.worldcat.org/title/studies-on-the-movement-of-soil-moisture/oclc/29749917 (last access: 10 December 2019),
1907. a
Chow, L., Xing, Z., Rees, H. W., Meng, F., Monteith, J., and Lionel, S.: Field
Performance of Nine Soil Water Content Sensors on a Sandy Loam Soil in New
Brunswick, Maritime Region, Canada, Sensors, 9, 9398–9413,
https://doi.org/10.3390/s91109398, 2009. a
Chudobiak, W. J., Syrett, B. A., and Hafez, H. M.: Recent Advances in
Broad-Band VHF and UHF Transmission Line Methods for Moisture Content and
Dielectric Constant Measurement, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measure., 28, 284–289, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.1979.4314833, 1979. a
Davis, B. R., Lundien, J. R., and Williamson, A. N.: Feasibility study of the
use of radar to detect surface and ground water, Tech. rep., US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi,
available at: http://cdm16021.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p266001coll1/id/2860 (last access: 10 December 2019),
1966. a
Dorigo, W. A., Wagner, W., Hohensinn, R., Hahn, S., Paulik, C., Xaver, A., Gruber, A., Drusch, M., Mecklenburg, S., van Oevelen, P., Robock, A., and Jackson, T.: The International Soil Moisture Network: a data hosting facility for global in situ soil moisture measurements, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15, 1675–1698, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1675-2011, 2011. a
Gardner, W. and Widtsoe, J. A.: The Movement of Soil Moisture, Soil Sci.,
11, 215–232, available at: https://journals.lww.com/soilsci/Fulltext/1921/03000/THE_MOVEMENT_OF_SOIL_MOISTURE.3.aspx (last access: 10 December 2019),
1921. a
Geiger, F. E. and Williams, D.: Dielectric constants of soils at microwave
frequencies, available at: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19720021782 (last access: 10 December 2019),
1972. a
Jackisch, C., Andrä, I., Germer, K., Schulz, K., Schiedung, M.,
Haller-Jans, J., Schneider, J., Jaquemotte, J., Helmer, P., Lotz, L., Graeff,
T., Bauer, A., Hahn, I., Sanda, M., Kumpan, M., Dorner, J., de Rooij, G.,
Wessel-Bothe, S., Kottmann, L., Schittenhelm, S., and Durner, W.: Soil
moisture and matric potential – An open field comparison of sensor systems,
PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.892319, 2018. a, b, c
Loewer, M., Günther, T., Igel, J., Kruschwitz, S., Martin, T., and Wagner,
N.: Ultra-broad-band electrical spectroscopy of soils and
sediments – a combined permittivity and conductivity model,
Geophys. J. Int., 210, 1360–1373, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx242, 2017. a
Mittelbach, H., Casini, F., Lehner, I., Teuling, A. J., and Seneviratne, S. I.:
Soil moisture monitoring for climate research: Evaluation of a low-cost
sensor in the framework of the Swiss Soil Moisture Experiment (SwissSMEX)
campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Solid Earth, 116, L18405, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014907, 2011. a
Or, D.: Who Invented the Tensiometer?, Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
J., 65, 1, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6511, 2001. a
Owen, B. B., Miller, R. C., Milner, C. E., and Cogan, H. L.: The Dielectric
Constant of Water as a Function of Temperature and Pressure, The J. Phys. Chem., 65, 2065–2070, https://doi.org/10.1021/j100828a035, 2002. a
Ponizovsky, A. A., Chudinova, S. M., and Pachepsky, Y. A.: Performance of TDR
calibration models as affected by soil texture, J. Hydrol., 218, 35–43, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(99)00017-7, 1999. a
Rosenbaum, U., Huisman, J. A., Vrba, J., Vereecken, H., and Bogena, H. R.:
Correction of Temperature and Electrical Conductivity Effects on Dielectric
Permittivity Measurements with ECH2O Sensors, Vadose Zone J., 10, 582–593, https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2010.0083, 2011. a, b
Roth, K., Schulin, R., Flühler, H., and Attinger, W.: Calibration of time
domain reflectometry for water content measurement using a composite
dielectric approach, Water Resour. Res., 26, 2267–2273,
https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i010p02267, 1990. a
Rowlandson, T. L., Berg, A. A., Bullock, P. R., Ojo, E. R., McNairn, H.,
Wiseman, G., and Cosh, M. H.: Evaluation of several calibration procedures
for a portable soil moisture sensor, J. Hydrol., 498, 335–344, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.05.021, 2013. a
Schwartz, R. C., Casanova, J. J., Pelletier, M. G., Evett, S. R., and
Baumhardt, R. L.: Soil Permittivity Response to Bulk Electrical Conductivity
for Selected Soil Water Sensors, Vadose Zone J., 12, 1–13,
https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2012.0133, 2013. a
Soilmoisture Equipment inc.: Trase Operating Instructions, available at: https://www.soilmoisture.com/pdfs/Resource_Instructions_0898-6050_6050 X1 Trase Full Ops. Manual 2000.pdf (last access: 10 December 2019), 1996. a
Stacheder, M., Fundinger, R., and Koehler, K.: On-Site Measurement of Soil
Water Content by a New Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) Technique, in: Field
Screening Europe, 161–164, Springer, Dordrecht, Dordrecht,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1473-5_37, 1997. a
Topp, G., Davis, J., and Annan, A.: Electromagnetic determination of soil
water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines, Water Resour. Res., 16, 574–582, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i003p00574, 1980. a
van der Ploeg, M. J., Gooren, H. P. A., Bakker, G., Hoogendam, C. W., Huiskes, C., Koopal, L. K., Kruidhof, H., and de Rooij, G. H.: Polymer tensiometers with ceramic cones: direct observations of matric pressures in drying soils, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1787–1799, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1787-2010, 2010.
a
Van Genuchten, M. T.: Closed-Form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic
Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898, 1980. a
Walker, J. P., Willgoose, G. R., and Kalma, J. D.: In situ measurement of soil
moisture: a comparison of techniques, J. Hydrol., 293, 85–99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.01.008, 2004. a
Wang, J. R. and Schmugge, T. J.: An Empirical Model for the Complex Dielectric
Permittivity of Soils as a Function of Water Content, Geoscience and Remote
Sensing, IEEE Trans., GE-18, 288–295,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1980.350304, 1980. a
Wild, J., Kopecký, M., Macek, M., Sanda, M., Jankovec, J., and Haase, T.:
Climate at ecologically relevant scales: A new temperature and soil moisture
logger for long-term microclimate measurement, Agr. Forest
Meteorol., 268, 40–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.12.018, 2019. a
Wraith, J. M. and Or, D.: Temperature effects on soil bulk dielectric
permittivity measured by time domain reflectometry: Experimental evidence and hypothesis development, Water Resour. Res., 35, 361–369,
https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900006, 1999. a
Short summary
Soil water content and matric potential are central hydrological state variables. A large variety of automated probes and sensor systems for field monitoring exist. In a field experiment under idealised conditions we compared 15 systems for soil moisture and 14 systems for matric potential. The individual records of one system agree well with the others. Most records are also plausible. However, the absolute values of the different measuring systems span a very large range of possible truths.
Soil water content and matric potential are central hydrological state variables. A large...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint