Articles | Volume 12, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-683-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-683-2020
Data description paper
 | 
23 Mar 2020
Data description paper |  | 23 Mar 2020

Soil moisture and matric potential – an open field comparison of sensor systems

Conrad Jackisch, Kai Germer, Thomas Graeff, Ines Andrä, Katrin Schulz, Marcus Schiedung, Jaqueline Haller-Jans, Jonas Schneider, Julia Jaquemotte, Philipp Helmer, Leander Lotz, Andreas Bauer, Irene Hahn, Martin Šanda, Monika Kumpan, Johann Dorner, Gerrit de Rooij, Stefan Wessel-Bothe, Lorenz Kottmann, Siegfried Schittenhelm, and Wolfgang Durner

Viewed

Total article views: 7,967 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
6,048 1,817 102 7,967 105 127
  • HTML: 6,048
  • PDF: 1,817
  • XML: 102
  • Total: 7,967
  • BibTeX: 105
  • EndNote: 127
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jun 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Jun 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 7,967 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 7,096 with geography defined and 871 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 19 May 2024
Download
Short summary
Soil water content and matric potential are central hydrological state variables. A large variety of automated probes and sensor systems for field monitoring exist. In a field experiment under idealised conditions we compared 15 systems for soil moisture and 14 systems for matric potential. The individual records of one system agree well with the others. Most records are also plausible. However, the absolute values of the different measuring systems span a very large range of possible truths.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint