Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1733-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1733-2024
Data description paper
 | 
05 Apr 2024
Data description paper |  | 05 Apr 2024

Enriching the GEOFON seismic catalog with automatic energy magnitude estimations

Dino Bindi, Riccardo Zaccarelli, Angelo Strollo, Domenico Di Giacomo, Andres Heinloo, Peter Evans, Fabrice Cotton, and Frederik Tilmann

Related authors

Capacity building enables unique near-fault observations of the destructive 2025 Mw 7.7 Myanmar earthquake
Ssu-Ting Lai, Kyaw Moe Oo, Yin Myo Min Htwe, Tin Yi, Htay Htay Than, Oo Than, Zaw Min, Tun Minn Oo, Phyo Maung Maung, Dino Bindi, Fabrice Cotton, Peter L. Evans, Andres Heinloo, Laura Hillmann, Joachim Saul, Christoph Sens-Schönfelder, Angelo Strollo, Frederik Tilmann, Graeme Weatherill, Ming-Hsuan Yen, Riccardo Zaccarelli, Thomas Zieke, and Claus Milkereit
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 5149–5164, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5149-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5149-2025, 2025
Short summary
A high-quality data set for seismological studies in the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Türkiye
Leonardo Colavitti, Dino Bindi, Gabriele Tarchini, Davide Scafidi, Matteo Picozzi, and Daniele Spallarossa
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 3089–3108, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3089-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3089-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Aki, K.: Generation and Propagation of G Waves from the Niigata Earthquake of June 16, 1964. Part 2. Estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress-strain drop from the G wave spectrum, B. Earthq. Res. I. Tokyo, 44, 73–88, https://doi.org/10.15083/0000033586, 1966. a
Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis, NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA [data set], https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/1163 (last access: March 2024), 2009. a
Atik, L. A. and Youngs, R. R.: Epistemic Uncertainty for NGA-West2 Models, Earthq. Spectra, 30, 1301–1318, https://doi.org/10.1193/062813EQS173M, 2014. a
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S.: Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4, J. Stat. Softw., 67, 1–48, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01, 2015. a
Bindi, D,. Zaccarelli, R., Strollo, A., Di Giacomo, D., Heinloo, A., Evans, P., Cotton, F., and Tilmann, F.: Global energy magnitude catalog 2011–2023 with event selection driven by Mw Geofon, V. 1.1. GFZ Data Services [data set], https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.2.6.2023.010, 2024. a, b, c, d, e
Download
Short summary
The size of an earthquake is often described by a single number called the magnitude. Among the possible magnitude scales, the seismic moment (Mw) and the radiated energy (Me) scales are based on physical parameters describing the rupture process. Since these two magnitude scales provide complementary information that can be used for seismic hazard assessment and for seismic risk mitigation, we complement the Mw catalog disseminated by the GEOFON Data Centre with Me values.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint