Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1733-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1733-2024
Data description paper
 | 
05 Apr 2024
Data description paper |  | 05 Apr 2024

Enriching the GEOFON seismic catalog with automatic energy magnitude estimations

Dino Bindi, Riccardo Zaccarelli, Angelo Strollo, Domenico Di Giacomo, Andres Heinloo, Peter Evans, Fabrice Cotton, and Frederik Tilmann

Related authors

A high-quality Data Set for seismological studies in the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Türkiye
Leonardo Colavitti, Dino Bindi, Gabriele Tarchini, Davide Scafidi, Matteo Picozzi, and Daniele Spallarossa
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-448,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-448, 2024
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses in seismic risk assessments on the example of Cologne, Germany
S. Tyagunov, M. Pittore, M. Wieland, S. Parolai, D. Bindi, K. Fleming, and J. Zschau
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1625–1640, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1625-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1625-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Domain: ESSD – Land | Subject: Geophysics and geodesy
Synthetic ground motions in heterogeneous geologies from various sources: the HEMEWS-3D database
Fanny Lehmann, Filippo Gatti, Michaël Bertin, and Didier Clouteau
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3949–3972, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3949-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3949-2024, 2024
Short summary
GravIS: mass anomaly products from satellite gravimetry
Christoph Dahle, Eva Boergens, Ingo Sasgen, Thorben Döhne, Sven Reißland, Henryk Dobslaw, Volker Klemann, Michael Murböck, Rolf König, Robert Dill, Mike Sips, Ulrike Sylla, Andreas Groh, Martin Horwath, and Frank Flechtner
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-347,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-347, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
HUST-Grace2024: a new GRACE-only gravity field time series based on more than 20 years of satellite geodesy data and a hybrid processing chain
Hao Zhou, Lijun Zheng, Yaozong Li, Xiang Guo, Zebing Zhou, and Zhicai Luo
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3261–3281, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3261-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3261-2024, 2024
Short summary
A new repository of electrical resistivity tomography and ground-penetrating radar data from summer 2022 near Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard
Francesca Pace, Andrea Vergnano, Alberto Godio, Gerardo Romano, Luigi Capozzoli, Ilaria Baneschi, Marco Doveri, and Alessandro Santilano
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3171–3192, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3171-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3171-2024, 2024
Short summary
AIUB-GRACE gravity field solutions for G3P: processing strategies and instrument parameterization
Neda Darbeheshti, Martin Lasser, Ulrich Meyer, Daniel Arnold, and Adrian Jäggi
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1589–1599, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1589-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1589-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Aki, K.: Generation and Propagation of G Waves from the Niigata Earthquake of June 16, 1964. Part 2. Estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress-strain drop from the G wave spectrum, B. Earthq. Res. I. Tokyo, 44, 73–88, https://doi.org/10.15083/0000033586, 1966. a
Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis, NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA [data set], https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/1163 (last access: March 2024), 2009. a
Atik, L. A. and Youngs, R. R.: Epistemic Uncertainty for NGA-West2 Models, Earthq. Spectra, 30, 1301–1318, https://doi.org/10.1193/062813EQS173M, 2014. a
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S.: Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4, J. Stat. Softw., 67, 1–48, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01, 2015. a
Bindi, D,. Zaccarelli, R., Strollo, A., Di Giacomo, D., Heinloo, A., Evans, P., Cotton, F., and Tilmann, F.: Global energy magnitude catalog 2011–2023 with event selection driven by Mw Geofon, V. 1.1. GFZ Data Services [data set], https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.2.6.2023.010, 2024. a, b, c, d, e
Download
Short summary
The size of an earthquake is often described by a single number called the magnitude. Among the possible magnitude scales, the seismic moment (Mw) and the radiated energy (Me) scales are based on physical parameters describing the rupture process. Since these two magnitude scales provide complementary information that can be used for seismic hazard assessment and for seismic risk mitigation, we complement the Mw catalog disseminated by the GEOFON Data Centre with Me values.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint