Articles | Volume 16, issue 4
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1733-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1733-2024
Data description paper
 | 
05 Apr 2024
Data description paper |  | 05 Apr 2024

Enriching the GEOFON seismic catalog with automatic energy magnitude estimations

Dino Bindi, Riccardo Zaccarelli, Angelo Strollo, Domenico Di Giacomo, Andres Heinloo, Peter Evans, Fabrice Cotton, and Frederik Tilmann

Related authors

A high-quality Data Set for seismological studies in the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Türkiye
Leonardo Colavitti, Dino Bindi, Gabriele Tarchini, Davide Scafidi, Matteo Picozzi, and Daniele Spallarossa
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-448,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-448, 2024
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses in seismic risk assessments on the example of Cologne, Germany
S. Tyagunov, M. Pittore, M. Wieland, S. Parolai, D. Bindi, K. Fleming, and J. Zschau
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 1625–1640, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1625-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-1625-2014, 2014

Related subject area

Domain: ESSD – Land | Subject: Geophysics and geodesy
GravIS: mass anomaly products from satellite gravimetry
Christoph Dahle, Eva Boergens, Ingo Sasgen, Thorben Döhne, Sven Reißland, Henryk Dobslaw, Volker Klemann, Michael Murböck, Rolf König, Robert Dill, Mike Sips, Ulrike Sylla, Andreas Groh, Martin Horwath, and Frank Flechtner
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 611–631, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-611-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-611-2025, 2025
Short summary
cigFacies: a massive-scale benchmark dataset of seismic facies and its application
Hui Gao, Xinming Wu, Xiaoming Sun, Mingcai Hou, Hang Gao, Guangyu Wang, and Hanlin Sheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 595–609, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-595-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-595-2025, 2025
Short summary
Regional scale shear wave velocity profiles for ground response analyses uncertainties evaluations – the Piedmont Region (NW Italy) Database
Cesare Comina, Guido Maria Adinolfi, Carlo Bertok, Andrea Bertea, Vittorio Giraud, and Pierluigi Pieruccini
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-413,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-413, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Airborne Gravimetry with Quantum Technology: Observations from Iceland and Greenland
Tim Enzlberger Jensen, Bjørnar Dale, Andreas Stokholm, René Forsberg, Alexandre Bresson, Nassim Zahzam, Alexis Bonnin, and Yannick Bidel
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-511,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-511, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Advancing geodynamic research in Antarctica: Reprocessing GNSS data to infer consistent coordinate time series (GIANT-REGAIN)
Eric Buchta, Mirko Scheinert, Matt A. King, Terry Wilson, Achraf Koulali, Peter J. Clarke, Demián Gómez, Eric Kendrick, Christoph Knöfel, and Peter Busch
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-355,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-355, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary

Cited articles

Aki, K.: Generation and Propagation of G Waves from the Niigata Earthquake of June 16, 1964. Part 2. Estimation of earthquake moment, released energy, and stress-strain drop from the G wave spectrum, B. Earthq. Res. I. Tokyo, 44, 73–88, https://doi.org/10.15083/0000033586, 1966. a
Amante, C. and Eakins, B. W.: ETOPO1 1 Arc-Minute Global Relief Model: Procedures, Data Sources and Analysis, NOAA Technical Memorandum NESDIS NGDC-24. National Geophysical Data Center, NOAA [data set], https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/1163 (last access: March 2024), 2009. a
Atik, L. A. and Youngs, R. R.: Epistemic Uncertainty for NGA-West2 Models, Earthq. Spectra, 30, 1301–1318, https://doi.org/10.1193/062813EQS173M, 2014. a
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S.: Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4, J. Stat. Softw., 67, 1–48, https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01, 2015. a
Bindi, D,. Zaccarelli, R., Strollo, A., Di Giacomo, D., Heinloo, A., Evans, P., Cotton, F., and Tilmann, F.: Global energy magnitude catalog 2011–2023 with event selection driven by Mw Geofon, V. 1.1. GFZ Data Services [data set], https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.2.6.2023.010, 2024. a, b, c, d, e
Download
Short summary
The size of an earthquake is often described by a single number called the magnitude. Among the possible magnitude scales, the seismic moment (Mw) and the radiated energy (Me) scales are based on physical parameters describing the rupture process. Since these two magnitude scales provide complementary information that can be used for seismic hazard assessment and for seismic risk mitigation, we complement the Mw catalog disseminated by the GEOFON Data Centre with Me values.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint