Articles | Volume 15, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1465-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1465-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description article
| 
31 Mar 2023
Data description article |
| 31 Mar 2023
| 31 Mar 2023
A 29-year time series of annual 300 m resolution plant-functional-type maps for climate models
Kandice L. Harper
Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348
Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Céline Lamarche
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348
Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Andrew Hartley
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Philippe Peylin
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Institut
Pierre-Simon Laplace, CEA-CNRS-Université Paris-Saclay, Orme des
Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Catherine Ottlé
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Institut
Pierre-Simon Laplace, CEA-CNRS-Université Paris-Saclay, Orme des
Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Vladislav Bastrikov
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Institut
Pierre-Simon Laplace, CEA-CNRS-Université Paris-Saclay, Orme des
Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Rodrigo San Martín
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, Institut
Pierre-Simon Laplace, CEA-CNRS-Université Paris-Saclay, Orme des
Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Sylvia I. Bohnenstengel
MetOffice@Reading, Reading, RG6 6BB, UK
Grit Kirches
Brockmann Consult GmbH, 21029 Hamburg, Germany
Martin Boettcher
Brockmann Consult GmbH, 21029 Hamburg, Germany
Roman Shevchuk
Brockmann Consult GmbH, 21029 Hamburg, Germany
Carsten Brockmann
Brockmann Consult GmbH, 21029 Hamburg, Germany
Pierre Defourny
Earth and Life Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, 1348
Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Related authors
No articles found.
Martin Willett, Melissa Brooks, Andrew Bushell, Paul Earnshaw, Samantha Smith, Lorenzo Tomassini, Martin Best, Ian Boutle, Jennifer Brooke, John M. Edwards, Andrew D. Elvidge, Kalli Furtado, Catherine Hardacre, Andrew J. Hartley, Alan J. Hewitt, Ben Johnson, Adrian Lock, Andy Malcolm, Jane Mulcahy, Eike Müller, Ian A. Renfrew, Heather Rumbold, Gabriel G. Rooney, Alistair Sellar, Masashi Ujiie, Annelize van Niekerk, Andy Wiltshire, and Michael Whitall
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 1473–1517, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1473-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1473-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Global Atmosphere (GA) configurations of the Unified Model (UM) and Global Land (GL) configurations of Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) are developed for use in any global atmospheric modelling application. We describe a recent iteration of these configurations, GA8GL9, which includes improvements to the representation of convection and other physical processes. GA8GL9 is used for operational weather prediction in the UK and forms the basis for the next GA and GL configuration.
Oscar Rojas-Munoz, Constantin Ardilouze, Bertrand Bonan, Diane Tzanos, Darren Ghent, Céline Lamarche, Thomas Nagler, and Jean-Christophe Calvet
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-65, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-65, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for The Cryosphere (TC).
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of land cover representation on snow simulations within the ISBA land surface model in Europe between 2010 and 2022 is assessed. The ECMWF ERA5 atmospheric forcing dataset is used to conduct offline simulations with and without new land cover data. Using the new data reduces the ISBA snow water equivalent bias by around 33 %. These results highlight the importance of accurate land cover data for improving snow representation in land surface models.
Jon Cranko Page, Martin G. De Kauwe, Andy J. Pitman, Isaac R. Towers, Gabriele Arduini, Martin J. Best, Craig R. Ferguson, Jürgen Knauer, Hyungjun Kim, David M. Lawrence, Tomoko Nitta, Keith W. Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Anna Ukkola, Nicholas Vuichard, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, and Gab Abramowitz
Biogeosciences, 23, 263–282, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-263-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-263-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This paper used a large dataset of observations, machine learning predictions, and computer model simulations to test how well land surface models represent the water, energy, and carbon cycles. We found that the models work well under "normal" weather but do not meet performance expectations during coinciding extreme conditions. Since these extremes are relatively rare, targeted model improvements could deliver major performance gains.
Simon Beylat, Nina Raoult, Cédric Bacour, Natalie Douglas, Tristan Quaife, Vladislav Bastrikov, Peter J. Rayner, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 7501–7527, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7501-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7501-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface models are important tools for understanding and predicting the land components of the carbon cycle. Atmospheric CO2 concentration data are a valuable source of information that can be used to improve the accuracy of these models. In this study, we present a statistical ensemble-variational data assimilation method named EnVarDA to calibrate parameters of a land surface model using these data. We show that this method is easy to implement and more efficient and accurate than traditional methods.
Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle Burton, Francesca Di Giuseppe, Matthew W. Jones, Maria L. F. Barbosa, Esther Brambleby, Joe R. McNorton, Zhongwei Liu, Anna S. I. Bradley, Katie Blackford, Eleanor Burke, Andrew Ciavarella, Enza Di Tomaso, Jonathan Eden, Igor José M. Ferreira, Lukas Fiedler, Andrew J. Hartley, Theodore R. Keeping, Seppe Lampe, Anna Lombardi, Guilherme Mataveli, Yuquan Qu, Patrícia S. Silva, Fiona R. Spuler, Carmen B. Steinmann, Miguel Ángel Torres-Vázquez, Renata Veiga, Dave van Wees, Jakob B. Wessel, Emily Wright, Bibiana Bilbao, Mathieu Bourbonnais, Cong Gao, Carlos M. Di Bella, Kebonye Dintwe, Victoria M. Donovan, Sarah Harris, Elena A. Kukavskaya, Aya Brigitte N'Dri, Cristina Santín, Galia Selaya, Johan Sjöström, John T. Abatzoglou, Niels Andela, Rachel Carmenta, Emilio Chuvieco, Louis Giglio, Douglas S. Hamilton, Stijn Hantson, Sarah Meier, Mark Parrington, Mojtaba Sadegh, Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz, Fernando Sedano, Marco Turco, Guido R. van der Werf, Sander Veraverbeke, Liana O. Anderson, Hamish Clarke, Paulo M. Fernandes, and Crystal A. Kolden
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 5377–5488, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5377-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5377-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The second State of Wildfires report examines extreme wildfire events from 2024 to early 2025. It analyses key regional events in Southern California, Northeast Amazonia, Pantanal–Chiquitano, and the Congo Basin, assessing their drivers and predictability and attributing them to climate change and land use. Seasonal outlooks and decadal projections are provided. Climate change greatly increased the likelihood of these fires, and without strong mitigation, such events will become more frequent.
Eric Pohl, Christophe Grenier, Antoine Séjourné, Frédéric Bouchard, Emmanuel Léger, Albane Saintenoy, Pavel Konstantinov, Amélie Cuynet, Catherine Ottlé, Christine Hatté, Aurélie Noret, Kensheri Danilov, Kirill Bazhin, Ivan Khristoforov, Daniel Fortier, Alexander Fedorov, and Emmanuel Mouche
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-134, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-134, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Permafrost is widespread in the Northern Hemisphere and is thawing due to climate warming, impacting energy and mass transfers. Small streams emerge alongside lakes when ice in the ground melts away, potentially accelerating thawing and biogeochemical activity in a positive feedback cycle. This study provides a comprehensive dataset on these little-studied streams, including thermally and hydrologically important variables essential for improving numerical models.
Rodrigo San Martin, Catherine Ottlé, Anna Sorenssön, Pradeebane Vattinada Ayar, Florent Mouillot, and Marielle Malfante
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3484, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3484, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We studied wildfires in the Gran Chaco, one of the world's largest dry forests, to understand why some fires grow larger than others. By analyzing fire size and weather conditions during burning, we found that strong winds and low humidity were key drivers of fire expansion. This work helps improve our understanding of extreme fire events and supports better fire risk management in dry ecosystems.
Rubaya Pervin, Scott Robeson, Mallory Barnes, Stephen Sitch, Anthony Walker, Ben Poulter, Fabienne Maignan, Qing Sun, Thomas Colligan, Sönke Zaehle, Kashif Mahmud, Peter Anthoni, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Vladislav Bastrikov, Liam Bogucki, Bertrand Decharme, Christine Delire, Stefanie Falk, Akihiko Ito, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Jürgen Knauer, Michael O’Sullivan, Wenping Yuan, and Natasha MacBean
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2841, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2841, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Drylands contribute more than a third of the global vegetation productivity. Yet, these regions are not well represented in global vegetation models. Here, we tested how well 15 global models capture annual changes in dryland vegetation productivity. Models that didn’t have vegetation change over time or fire have lower variability in vegetation productivity. Models need better representation of grass cover types and their coverage. Our work highlights where and how these models need to improve.
Mike Bush, David L. A. Flack, Huw W. Lewis, Sylvia I. Bohnenstengel, Chris J. Short, Charmaine Franklin, Adrian P. Lock, Martin Best, Paul Field, Anne McCabe, Kwinten Van Weverberg, Segolene Berthou, Ian Boutle, Jennifer K. Brooke, Seb Cole, Shaun Cooper, Gareth Dow, John Edwards, Anke Finnenkoetter, Kalli Furtado, Kate Halladay, Kirsty Hanley, Margaret A. Hendry, Adrian Hill, Aravindakshan Jayakumar, Richard W. Jones, Humphrey Lean, Joshua C. K. Lee, Andy Malcolm, Marion Mittermaier, Saji Mohandas, Stuart Moore, Cyril Morcrette, Rachel North, Aurore Porson, Susan Rennie, Nigel Roberts, Belinda Roux, Claudio Sanchez, Chun-Hsu Su, Simon Tucker, Simon Vosper, David Walters, James Warner, Stuart Webster, Mark Weeks, Jonathan Wilkinson, Michael Whitall, Keith D. Williams, and Hugh Zhang
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3819–3855, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3819-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3819-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
RAL configurations define settings for the Unified Model atmosphere and Joint UK Land Environment Simulator. The third version of the Regional Atmosphere and Land (RAL3) science configuration for kilometre- and sub-kilometre-scale modelling represents a major advance compared to previous versions (RAL2) by delivering a common science definition for applications in tropical and mid-latitude regions. RAL3 has more realistic precipitation distributions and an improved representation of clouds and visibility.
Zacharie Titus, Amélie Cuynet, Elodie Salmon, and Catherine Ottlé
The Cryosphere, 19, 2105–2114, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2105-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-2105-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The representation of lake ice dynamics is key to model water–atmosphere energy and mass transfers in cold environments. The use of albedo satellite products to constrain the modeling of ice coverage appears to be very suitable and valuable. In this work, we show how the modeling of lake albedo and ice phenology in the land surface model ORCHIDEE was improved by accounting for fractional ice cover calibrated against lake surface albedo data.
Joseph W. Gallear, Marcelo Valadares Galdos, Marcelo Zeri, and Andrew Hartley
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1521–1541, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1521-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1521-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In Brazil, drought is of national concern and can have major consequences for agriculture. Here, we determine how to develop forecasts for drought stress on vegetation health using machine learning. Results aim to inform future developments in operational drought monitoring at the National Centre for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disasters (CEMADEN) in Brazil. This information is essential for disaster preparedness and planning of future actions to support areas affected by drought.
Inika Taylor, Douglas I. Kelley, Camilla Mathison, Karina E. Williams, Andrew J. Hartley, Richard A. Betts, and Chantelle Burton
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-720, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-720, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change is reshaping fire seasons worldwide and, in many places, increasing fire weather risk. We use climate model simulations to project future changes in fire danger at different levels of global warming, focusing on Australia, Brazil, and the USA. Keeping warming below 2 °C significantly limits the increase in fire risk, but even at 1.5 °C, fire seasons lengthen, with more extreme conditions. However, low-fire weather periods remain, offering critical windows for fire management.
Jessica Stacey, Richard Betts, Andrew Hartley, Lina Mercado, and Nicola Gedney
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-51, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-51, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Plants typically transpire less with rising atmospheric carbon dioxide, leaving more water in the ground for human use, but many future water scarcity assessments ignore this effect. We use a land surface model to examine how plant responses to carbon dioxide and climate change affect future water scarcity. Our results suggest that including these plant responses increases overall water availability for most people, highlighting the importance of their inclusion in future water scarcity studies.
Luis-Enrique Olivera-Guerra, Catherine Ottlé, Nina Raoult, and Philippe Peylin
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 261–290, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-261-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-261-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We assimilate the recent ESA-CCI land surface temperature (LST) product to optimize parameters of a land surface model (ORCHIDEE). We test different assimilation strategies to evaluate the best strategy over various in situ stations across Europe. We also provide advice on how to assimilate this LST product to better simulate LST and surface energy fluxes. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of this optimization, which is essential to better simulate future projections.
Gab Abramowitz, Anna Ukkola, Sanaa Hobeichi, Jon Cranko Page, Mathew Lipson, Martin G. De Kauwe, Samuel Green, Claire Brenner, Jonathan Frame, Grey Nearing, Martyn Clark, Martin Best, Peter Anthoni, Gabriele Arduini, Souhail Boussetta, Silvia Caldararu, Kyeungwoo Cho, Matthias Cuntz, David Fairbairn, Craig R. Ferguson, Hyungjun Kim, Yeonjoo Kim, Jürgen Knauer, David Lawrence, Xiangzhong Luo, Sergey Malyshev, Tomoko Nitta, Jerome Ogee, Keith Oleson, Catherine Ottlé, Phillipe Peylin, Patricia de Rosnay, Heather Rumbold, Bob Su, Nicolas Vuichard, Anthony P. Walker, Xiaoni Wang-Faivre, Yunfei Wang, and Yijian Zeng
Biogeosciences, 21, 5517–5538, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5517-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper evaluates land models – computer-based models that simulate ecosystem dynamics; land carbon, water, and energy cycles; and the role of land in the climate system. It uses machine learning and AI approaches to show that, despite the complexity of land models, they do not perform nearly as well as they could given the amount of information they are provided with about the prediction problem.
Guillaume Marie, Jina Jeong, Hervé Jactel, Gunnar Petter, Maxime Cailleret, Matthew J. McGrath, Vladislav Bastrikov, Josefine Ghattas, Bertrand Guenet, Anne Sofie Lansø, Kim Naudts, Aude Valade, Chao Yue, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 8023–8047, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8023-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-8023-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This research looks at how climate change influences forests, and particularly how altered wind and insect activities could make forests emit instead of absorb carbon. We have updated a land surface model called ORCHIDEE to better examine the effect of bark beetles on forest health. Our findings suggest that sudden events, such as insect outbreaks, can dramatically affect carbon storage, offering crucial insights into tackling climate change.
Sylvie Charbit, Christophe Dumas, Fabienne Maignan, Catherine Ottlé, Nina Raoult, Xavier Fettweis, and Philippe Conesa
The Cryosphere, 18, 5067–5099, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5067-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5067-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The evolution of the Greenland ice sheet is highly dependent on surface melting and therefore on the processes operating at the snow–atmosphere interface and within the snow cover. Here we present new developments to apply a snow model to the Greenland ice sheet. The performance of this model is analysed in terms of its ability to simulate ablation processes. Our analysis shows that the model performs well when compared with the MAR regional polar atmospheric model.
Jaime A. Riano Sanchez, Nicolas Vuichard, and Philippe Peylin
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1227–1253, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1227-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1227-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We quantify the projected change in land carbon store (CLCS) for different socioeconomic scenarios (SSPs). Using factorial simulations of a land surface model, we estimate the CLCS uncertainties associated with land use change (LUC) and nitrogen (N) deposition trajectories. Our study highlights the need for delivering additional LUC and N deposition trajectories from integrated assessment models for each SSP in order to accurately assess their impacts on the carbon cycle and climate.
Matthew W. Jones, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle A. Burton, Francesca Di Giuseppe, Maria Lucia F. Barbosa, Esther Brambleby, Andrew J. Hartley, Anna Lombardi, Guilherme Mataveli, Joe R. McNorton, Fiona R. Spuler, Jakob B. Wessel, John T. Abatzoglou, Liana O. Anderson, Niels Andela, Sally Archibald, Dolors Armenteras, Eleanor Burke, Rachel Carmenta, Emilio Chuvieco, Hamish Clarke, Stefan H. Doerr, Paulo M. Fernandes, Louis Giglio, Douglas S. Hamilton, Stijn Hantson, Sarah Harris, Piyush Jain, Crystal A. Kolden, Tiina Kurvits, Seppe Lampe, Sarah Meier, Stacey New, Mark Parrington, Morgane M. G. Perron, Yuquan Qu, Natasha S. Ribeiro, Bambang H. Saharjo, Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz, Jacquelyn K. Shuman, Veerachai Tanpipat, Guido R. van der Werf, Sander Veraverbeke, and Gavriil Xanthopoulos
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3601–3685, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This inaugural State of Wildfires report catalogues extreme fires of the 2023–2024 fire season. For key events, we analyse their predictability and drivers and attribute them to climate change and land use. We provide a seasonal outlook and decadal projections. Key anomalies occurred in Canada, Greece, and western Amazonia, with other high-impact events catalogued worldwide. Climate change significantly increased the likelihood of extreme fires, and mitigation is required to lessen future risk.
Nina Raoult, Simon Beylat, James M. Salter, Frédéric Hourdin, Vladislav Bastrikov, Catherine Ottlé, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 5779–5801, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-5779-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We use computer models to predict how the land surface will respond to climate change. However, these complex models do not always simulate what we observe in real life, limiting their effectiveness. To improve their accuracy, we use sophisticated statistical and computational techniques. We test a technique called history matching against more common approaches. This method adapts well to these models, helping us better understand how they work and therefore how to make them more realistic.
Nina Raoult, Louis-Axel Edouard-Rambaut, Nicolas Vuichard, Vladislav Bastrikov, Anne Sofie Lansø, Bertrand Guenet, and Philippe Peylin
Biogeosciences, 21, 1017–1036, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1017-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1017-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Observations are used to reduce uncertainty in land surface models (LSMs) by optimising poorly constraining parameters. However, optimising against current conditions does not necessarily ensure that the parameters treated as invariant will be robust in a changing climate. Manipulation experiments offer us a unique chance to optimise our models under different (here atmospheric CO2) conditions. By using these data in optimisations, we gain confidence in the future projections of LSMs.
Mickaël Lalande, Martin Ménégoz, Gerhard Krinner, Catherine Ottlé, and Frédérique Cheruy
The Cryosphere, 17, 5095–5130, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5095-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-5095-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the impact of topography on snow cover parameterizations using models and observations. Parameterizations without topography-based considerations overestimate snow cover. Incorporating topography reduces snow overestimation by 5–10 % in mountains, in turn reducing cold biases. However, some biases remain, requiring further calibration and more data. Assessing snow cover parameterizations is challenging due to limited and uncertain data in mountainous regions.
Martin Schwartz, Philippe Ciais, Aurélien De Truchis, Jérôme Chave, Catherine Ottlé, Cedric Vega, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Manuel Nicolas, Sami Jouaber, Siyu Liu, Martin Brandt, and Ibrahim Fayad
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4927–4945, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4927-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4927-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As forests play a key role in climate-related issues, their accurate monitoring is critical to reduce global carbon emissions effectively. Based on open-access remote-sensing sensors, and artificial intelligence methods, we created high-resolution tree height, wood volume, and biomass maps of metropolitan France that outperform previous products. This study, based on freely available data, provides essential information to support climate-efficient forest management policies at a low cost.
Matthew J. McGrath, Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Philippe Peylin, Robbie M. Andrew, Bradley Matthews, Frank Dentener, Juraj Balkovič, Vladislav Bastrikov, Meike Becker, Gregoire Broquet, Philippe Ciais, Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, Raphael Ganzenmüller, Giacomo Grassi, Ian Harris, Matthew Jones, Jürgen Knauer, Matthias Kuhnert, Guillaume Monteil, Saqr Munassar, Paul I. Palmer, Glen P. Peters, Chunjing Qiu, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Oksana Tarasova, Matteo Vizzarri, Karina Winkler, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Antoine Berchet, Peter Briggs, Patrick Brockmann, Frédéric Chevallier, Giulia Conchedda, Monica Crippa, Stijn N. C. Dellaert, Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon, Sara Filipek, Pierre Friedlingstein, Richard Fuchs, Michael Gauss, Christoph Gerbig, Diego Guizzardi, Dirk Günther, Richard A. Houghton, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Ronny Lauerwald, Bas Lerink, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Géraud Moulas, Marilena Muntean, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Aurélie Paquirissamy, Lucia Perugini, Wouter Peters, Roberto Pilli, Julia Pongratz, Pierre Regnier, Marko Scholze, Yusuf Serengil, Pete Smith, Efisio Solazzo, Rona L. Thompson, Francesco N. Tubiello, Timo Vesala, and Sophia Walther
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4295–4370, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate estimation of fluxes of carbon dioxide from the land surface is essential for understanding future impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the climate system. A wide variety of methods currently exist to estimate these sources and sinks. We are continuing work to develop annual comparisons of these diverse methods in order to clarify what they all actually calculate and to resolve apparent disagreement, in addition to highlighting opportunities for increased understanding.
Camilla Mathison, Eleanor Burke, Andrew J. Hartley, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle Burton, Eddy Robertson, Nicola Gedney, Karina Williams, Andy Wiltshire, Richard J. Ellis, Alistair A. Sellar, and Chris D. Jones
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4249–4264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4249-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4249-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes and evaluates a new modelling methodology to quantify the impacts of climate change on water, biomes and the carbon cycle. We have created a new configuration and set-up for the JULES-ES land surface model, driven by bias-corrected historical and future climate model output provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impacts Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP). This allows us to compare projections of the impacts of climate change across multiple impact models and multiple sectors.
Nina Raoult, Sylvie Charbit, Christophe Dumas, Fabienne Maignan, Catherine Ottlé, and Vladislav Bastrikov
The Cryosphere, 17, 2705–2724, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2705-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-2705-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Greenland ice sheet melting due to global warming could significantly impact global sea-level rise. The ice sheet's albedo, i.e. how reflective the surface is, affects the melting speed. The ORCHIDEE computer model is used to simulate albedo and snowmelt to make predictions. However, the albedo in ORCHIDEE is lower than that observed using satellites. To correct this, we change model parameters (e.g. the rate of snow decay) to reduce the difference between simulated and observed values.
Jan Polcher, Anthony Schrapffer, Eliott Dupont, Lucia Rinchiuso, Xudong Zhou, Olivier Boucher, Emmanuel Mouche, Catherine Ottlé, and Jérôme Servonnat
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 2583–2606, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2583-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2583-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The proposed graphs of hydrological sub-grid elements for atmospheric models allow us to integrate the topographical elements needed in land surface models for a realistic representation of horizontal water and energy transport. The study demonstrates the numerical properties of the automatically built graphs and the simulated water flows.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Chunjing Qiu, Matthew J. McGrath, Philippe Peylin, Glen P. Peters, Philippe Ciais, Rona L. Thompson, Aki Tsuruta, Dominik Brunner, Matthias Kuhnert, Bradley Matthews, Paul I. Palmer, Oksana Tarasova, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, David Bastviken, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Wilfried Winiwarter, Giuseppe Etiope, Tuula Aalto, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Vladislav Bastrikov, Antoine Berchet, Patrick Brockmann, Giancarlo Ciotoli, Giulia Conchedda, Monica Crippa, Frank Dentener, Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink, Diego Guizzardi, Dirk Günther, Jean-Matthieu Haussaire, Sander Houweling, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Massaer Kouyate, Adrian Leip, Antti Leppänen, Emanuele Lugato, Manon Maisonnier, Alistair J. Manning, Tiina Markkanen, Joe McNorton, Marilena Muntean, Gabriel D. Oreggioni, Prabir K. Patra, Lucia Perugini, Isabelle Pison, Maarit T. Raivonen, Marielle Saunois, Arjo J. Segers, Pete Smith, Efisio Solazzo, Hanqin Tian, Francesco N. Tubiello, Timo Vesala, Guido R. van der Werf, Chris Wilson, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1197–1268, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study updates the state-of-the-art scientific overview of CH4 and N2O emissions in the EU27 and UK in Petrescu et al. (2021a). Yearly updates are needed to improve the different respective approaches and to inform on the development of formal verification systems. It integrates the most recent emission inventories, process-based model and regional/global inversions, comparing them with UNFCCC national GHG inventories, in support to policy to facilitate real-time verification procedures.
Anthony Bernus and Catherine Ottlé
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 4275–4295, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4275-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4275-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The lake model FLake was coupled to the ORCHIDEE land surface model to simulate lake energy balance at global scale with a multi-tile approach. Several simulations were performed with various atmospheric reanalyses and different lake depth parameterizations. The simulated lake surface temperature showed good agreement with observations (RMSEs of the order of 3 °C). We showed the large impact of the atmospheric forcing on lake temperature. We highlighted systematic errors on ice cover phenology.
B. Beaumont, Y. Loozen, T. Castin, J. Radoux, C. Wyard, D. Lauwaet, F. Lefebre, T. Halford, M. Haid, P. Defourny, and E. Hallot
ISPRS Ann. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., V-4-2022, 243–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2022-243-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-V-4-2022-243-2022, 2022
Camille Abadie, Fabienne Maignan, Marine Remaud, Jérôme Ogée, J. Elliott Campbell, Mary E. Whelan, Florian Kitz, Felix M. Spielmann, Georg Wohlfahrt, Richard Wehr, Wu Sun, Nina Raoult, Ulli Seibt, Didier Hauglustaine, Sinikka T. Lennartz, Sauveur Belviso, David Montagne, and Philippe Peylin
Biogeosciences, 19, 2427–2463, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2427-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A better constraint of the components of the carbonyl sulfide (COS) global budget is needed to exploit its potential as a proxy of gross primary productivity. In this study, we compare two representations of oxic soil COS fluxes, and we develop an approach to represent anoxic soil COS fluxes in a land surface model. We show the importance of atmospheric COS concentration variations on oxic soil COS fluxes and provide new estimates for oxic and anoxic soil contributions to the COS global budget.
Elodie Salmon, Fabrice Jégou, Bertrand Guenet, Line Jourdain, Chunjing Qiu, Vladislav Bastrikov, Christophe Guimbaud, Dan Zhu, Philippe Ciais, Philippe Peylin, Sébastien Gogo, Fatima Laggoun-Défarge, Mika Aurela, M. Syndonia Bret-Harte, Jiquan Chen, Bogdan H. Chojnicki, Housen Chu, Colin W. Edgar, Eugenie S. Euskirchen, Lawrence B. Flanagan, Krzysztof Fortuniak, David Holl, Janina Klatt, Olaf Kolle, Natalia Kowalska, Lars Kutzbach, Annalea Lohila, Lutz Merbold, Włodzimierz Pawlak, Torsten Sachs, and Klaudia Ziemblińska
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2813–2838, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2813-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2813-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A methane model that features methane production and transport by plants, the ebullition process and diffusion in soil, oxidation to CO2, and CH4 fluxes to the atmosphere has been embedded in the ORCHIDEE-PEAT land surface model, which includes an explicit representation of northern peatlands. This model, ORCHIDEE-PCH4, was calibrated and evaluated on 14 peatland sites. Results show that the model is sensitive to temperature and substrate availability over the top 75 cm of soil depth.
Guillaume Marie, B. Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Cecile Dardel, Thuy Le Toan, Alexandre Bouvet, Stéphane Mermoz, Ludovic Villard, Vladislav Bastrikov, and Philippe Peylin
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2599–2617, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2599-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2599-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Most Earth system models make use of vegetation maps to initialize a simulation at global scale. Satellite-based biomass map estimates for Africa were used to estimate cover fractions for the 15 land cover classes. This study successfully demonstrates that satellite-based biomass maps can be used to better constrain vegetation maps. Applying this approach at the global scale would increase confidence in assessments of present-day biomass stocks.
Audrey Jolivot, Valentine Lebourgeois, Louise Leroux, Mael Ameline, Valérie Andriamanga, Beatriz Bellón, Mathieu Castets, Arthur Crespin-Boucaud, Pierre Defourny, Santiana Diaz, Mohamadou Dieye, Stéphane Dupuy, Rodrigo Ferraz, Raffaele Gaetano, Marie Gely, Camille Jahel, Bertin Kabore, Camille Lelong, Guerric le Maire, Danny Lo Seen, Martha Muthoni, Babacar Ndao, Terry Newby, Cecília Lira Melo de Oliveira Santos, Eloise Rasoamalala, Margareth Simoes, Ibrahima Thiaw, Alice Timmermans, Annelise Tran, and Agnès Bégué
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 5951–5967, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5951-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5951-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents nine standardized crop type reference datasets collected between 2013 and 2020 in seven tropical countries. It aims at participating in the difficult exercise of mapping agricultural land use through satellite image classification in those complex areas where few ground truth or census data are available. These quality-controlled datasets were collected in the framework of the international JECAM initiative and contain 27 074 polygons documented by detailed keywords.
Jina Jeong, Jonathan Barichivich, Philippe Peylin, Vanessa Haverd, Matthew Joseph McGrath, Nicolas Vuichard, Michael Neil Evans, Flurin Babst, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5891–5913, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5891-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5891-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We have proposed and evaluated the use of four benchmarks that leverage tree-ring width observations to provide more nuanced verification targets for land-surface models (LSMs), which currently lack a long-term benchmark for forest ecosystem functioning. Using relatively unbiased European biomass network datasets, we identify the extent to which presumed biases in the much larger International Tree-Ring Data Bank might degrade the validation of LSMs.
Thomas Neumann, Sampsa Koponen, Jenni Attila, Carsten Brockmann, Kari Kallio, Mikko Kervinen, Constant Mazeran, Dagmar Müller, Petra Philipson, Susanne Thulin, Sakari Väkevä, and Pasi Ylöstalo
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5049–5062, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5049-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5049-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The Baltic Sea is heavily impacted by surrounding land. Therefore, the concentration of colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) of terrestrial origin is relatively high and impacts the light penetration depth. Estimating a correct light climate is essential for ecosystem models. In this study, a method is developed to derive riverine CDOM from Earth observation methods. The data are used as boundary conditions for an ecosystem model, and the advantage over former approaches is shown.
Jonathan Barichivich, Philippe Peylin, Thomas Launois, Valerie Daux, Camille Risi, Jina Jeong, and Sebastiaan Luyssaert
Biogeosciences, 18, 3781–3803, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3781-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3781-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The width and the chemical signals of tree rings have the potential to test and improve the physiological responses simulated by global land surface models, which are at the core of future climate projections. Here, we demonstrate the novel use of tree-ring width and carbon and oxygen stable isotopes to evaluate the representation of tree growth and physiology in a global land surface model at temporal scales beyond experimentation and direct observation.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Chunjing Qiu, Philippe Ciais, Rona L. Thompson, Philippe Peylin, Matthew J. McGrath, Efisio Solazzo, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Francesco N. Tubiello, Peter Bergamaschi, Dominik Brunner, Glen P. Peters, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, David Bastviken, Aki Tsuruta, Wilfried Winiwarter, Prabir K. Patra, Matthias Kuhnert, Gabriel D. Oreggioni, Monica Crippa, Marielle Saunois, Lucia Perugini, Tiina Markkanen, Tuula Aalto, Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink, Hanqin Tian, Yuanzhi Yao, Chris Wilson, Giulia Conchedda, Dirk Günther, Adrian Leip, Pete Smith, Jean-Matthieu Haussaire, Antti Leppänen, Alistair J. Manning, Joe McNorton, Patrick Brockmann, and Albertus Johannes Dolman
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 2307–2362, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2307-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2307-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study is topical and provides a state-of-the-art scientific overview of data availability from bottom-up and top-down CH4 and N2O emissions in the EU27 and UK. The data integrate recent emission inventories with process-based model data and regional/global inversions for the European domain, aiming at reconciling them with official country-level UNFCCC national GHG inventories in support to policy and to facilitate real-time verification procedures.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Matthew J. McGrath, Robbie M. Andrew, Philippe Peylin, Glen P. Peters, Philippe Ciais, Gregoire Broquet, Francesco N. Tubiello, Christoph Gerbig, Julia Pongratz, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Giacomo Grassi, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, Matthias Kuhnert, Juraj Balkovič, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Hugo A. C. Denier van der
Gon, Efisio Solazzo, Chunjing Qiu, Roberto Pilli, Igor B. Konovalov, Richard A. Houghton, Dirk Günther, Lucia Perugini, Monica Crippa, Raphael Ganzenmüller, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Pete Smith, Saqr Munassar, Rona L. Thompson, Giulia Conchedda, Guillaume Monteil, Marko Scholze, Ute Karstens, Patrick Brockmann, and Albertus Johannes Dolman
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 2363–2406, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study is topical and provides a state-of-the-art scientific overview of data availability from bottom-up and top-down CO2 fossil emissions and CO2 land fluxes in the EU27+UK. The data integrate recent emission inventories with ecosystem data, land carbon models and regional/global inversions for the European domain, aiming at reconciling CO2 estimates with official country-level UNFCCC national GHG inventories in support to policy and facilitating real-time verification procedures.
Zichong Chen, Junjie Liu, Daven K. Henze, Deborah N. Huntzinger, Kelley C. Wells, Stephen Sitch, Pierre Friedlingstein, Emilie Joetzjer, Vladislav Bastrikov, Daniel S. Goll, Vanessa Haverd, Atul K. Jain, Etsushi Kato, Sebastian Lienert, Danica L. Lombardozzi, Patrick C. McGuire, Joe R. Melton, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Benjamin Poulter, Hanqin Tian, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Sönke Zaehle, and Scot M. Miller
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6663–6680, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6663-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6663-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) satellite observes atmospheric CO2 globally. We use a multiple regression and inverse model to quantify the relationships between OCO-2 and environmental drivers within individual years for 2015–2018 and within seven global biomes. Our results point to limitations of current space-based observations for inferring environmental relationships but also indicate the potential to inform key relationships that are very uncertain in process-based models.
Hiroki Mizuochi, Agnès Ducharne, Frédérique Cheruy, Josefine Ghattas, Amen Al-Yaari, Jean-Pierre Wigneron, Vladislav Bastrikov, Philippe Peylin, Fabienne Maignan, and Nicolas Vuichard
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2199–2221, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2199-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-2199-2021, 2021
Daniele Peano, Deborah Hemming, Stefano Materia, Christine Delire, Yuanchao Fan, Emilie Joetzjer, Hanna Lee, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Taejin Park, Philippe Peylin, David Wårlind, Andy Wiltshire, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 18, 2405–2428, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2405-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2405-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Global climate models are the scientist’s tools used for studying past, present, and future climate conditions. This work examines the ability of a group of our tools in reproducing and capturing the right timing and length of the season when plants show their green leaves. This season, indeed, is fundamental for CO2 exchanges between land, atmosphere, and climate. This work shows that discrepancies compared to observations remain, demanding further polishing of these tools.
Cited articles
Andréfouët, S., Bindschadler, R., Brown De Colstoun, E. C., Choate, M., Chomentowski, W., Christopherson, J., Doorn, B., Hall, D. K., Holifield, C., Howard, S., Kranenburg, C., Lee, S., Masek, J. B., Moran, M., Mueller-Karger, F., Ohlen, D., Palandro, D., Price, J., Qi, J., Reed, B. C., Samek, J., Scaramuzza, P., Skole, D., Schott, J., Storey, J., Thome, K., Torres-Pulliza, D., Vogelmann, J., Williams, D. L., Woodcock, C., and Wylie, B.: Preliminary
Assessment of the Value of Landsat-7 ETM+ Data Following Scan Line
Corrector Malfunction, US Geological Survey, EROS Data Center: Sioux Falls,
SD, USA, Science, 1–86, 2003.
Bartsch, A., Widhalm, B., Pointner, G., Ermokhina, K. A., Leibman, M., and Heim,
B.: Land cover derived from Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 satellite data
(2015–2018) for subarctic and arctic environments, Zentralanstalt für
Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Wien, PANGAEA,
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.897916, 2019.
Bastos, A., O'Sullivan, M., Ciais, P., Makowski, D., Sitch, S.,
Friedlingstein, P., Chevallier, F., Rödenbeck, C., Pongratz, J., Luijkx,
I. T., Patra, P. K., Peylin, P., Canadell, J. G., Lauerwald, R., Li, W.,
Smith, N. E., Peters, W., Goll, D. S., Jain, A. K., Kato, E., Lienert, S.,
Lombardozzi, D. L., Haverd, V., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Poulter, B., Tian, H.,
Walker, A. P., and Zaehle, S.: Sources of uncertainty in regional and global
terrestrial CO2 exchange estimates, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 34, 1–21,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GB006393, 2020.
Bastos, A., Hartung, K., Nützel, T. B., Nabel, J. E. M. S., Houghton, R. A., and Pongratz, J.: Comparison of uncertainties in land-use change fluxes from bookkeeping model parameterisation, Earth Syst. Dynam., 12, 745–762, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-12-745-2021, 2021.
Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., McVicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A.,
and Wood, E. F.: Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification
maps at 1-km resolution, Nature Scientific Data, 5, 180214,
https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214, 2018.
Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Clark, D. B., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Ménard, C. B., Edwards, J. M., Hendry, M. A., Porson, A., Gedney, N., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Cox, P. M., Grimmond, C. S. B., and Harding, R. J.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 1: Energy and water fluxes, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 677–699, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-677-2011, 2011.
Bouvet, A., Mermoz, S., Le Toan, T., Villard, L., Mathieu, R., Naidoo, L.,
and Asner, G. P.: An Above-Ground Biomass Map of African Savannahs and
Woodlands at 25 m Resolution Derived from ALOS PALSAR, Remote Sens.
Environ., 206, 156–173,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.12.030, 2018.
Box, E. O.: Predicting physiognomic vegetation types with climate variables,
Vegetatio, 45, 127–139, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119222, 1981.
Box, E. O.: Plant functional types and climate at the global scale, J. Veg.
Sci., 7, 309–320, https://doi.org/10.2307/3236274, 1996.
Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Driesschaert, E., Fichefet, T., Kicklighter, D.,
Loutre, M. F., Matthews, H. D., Ramankutty, N., Schaeffer, M., and Sokolov,
A.: Biogeophysical effects of historical land cover changes simulated by six
Earth system models of intermediate complexity, Clim. Dynam., 26, 587–600,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0092-6, 2006.
Clark, D. B., Mercado, L. M., Sitch, S., Jones, C. D., Gedney, N., Best, M. J., Pryor, M., Rooney, G. G., Essery, R. L. H., Blyth, E., Boucher, O., Harding, R. J., Huntingford, C., and Cox, P. M.: The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 701–722, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-701-2011, 2011.
Dale, V. H.: The relationship between land-use change and climate change,
Ecol. Appl., 7, 753–769,
https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0753:TRBLUC]2.0.CO;2, 1997.
Danielson, J. and Gesch, D.: Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data
2010 (GMTED2010), U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2011–1073, US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey Washington, DC, USA, https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20111073, 2011.
Defourny, P., Lamarche, C., Brockmann, C., Boettcher, M., Bontemps, S., De
Maet, T., Duveiller, G. L. Harper, K., Hartley A., Kirches, G., Moreau, I.,
Peylin, P., Ottlé, C., Radoux J., Van Bogaert, E., Ramoino, F.,
Albergel, C., and Arino, O.: Observed annual global land-use change from 1992 to
2020 three times more dynamic than reported by inventory-based statistics,
in preparation, 2023.
Devaraju, N., Bala, G., and Modak, A.: Effects of large-scale deforestation
on precipitation in the monsoon regions: Remote versus local effects, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 3257–3262,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423439112, 2015.
Di Gregorio, A., and Jansen, L. J. M. Land Cover Classification System
(LCCS): Classification Concepts and User Manual, Fao, Vol. 53, Food &
Agriculture Organization, https://www.fao.org/3/x0596e/x0596e00.htm (last access: 20 March 2023), 2005.
Esch, T., Heldens, W., Hirner, A., Keil, M., Marconcini, M., Roth, A.,
Zeidler, J., Dech, S., and Strano, E.: Breaking new ground in mapping human
settlements from space – The Global Urban Footprint, J. Photogramm. Remote, 134, 30–42,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.10.012, 2017.
Feddema, J., Oleson, K., Bonan, G., Mearns, L., Washington, W., Meehl, G.,
and Nychka, D.: A comparison of a GCM response to historical anthropogenic
land cover change and model sensitivity to uncertainty in present-day land
cover representations, Clim. Dynam., 25, 581–609,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-005-0038-z, 2005.
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter,
S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., Gibbs, H. K., Helkowski, J.
H., Holloway, T., Howard, E. A., Kucharik, C. J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J. A.,
Prentice, I. C., Ramankutty, N., and Snyder, P. K.: Global consequences of
land use, Science, 309, 570–574,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772, 2005.
Frieler, K., Lange, S., Piontek, F., Reyer, C. P. O., Schewe, J., Warszawski, L., Zhao, F., Chini, L., Denvil, S., Emanuel, K., Geiger, T., Halladay, K., Hurtt, G., Mengel, M., Murakami, D., Ostberg, S., Popp, A., Riva, R., Stevanovic, M., Suzuki, T., Volkholz, J., Burke, E., Ciais, P., Ebi, K., Eddy, T. D., Elliott, J., Galbraith, E., Gosling, S. N., Hattermann, F., Hickler, T., Hinkel, J., Hof, C., Huber, V., Jägermeyr, J., Krysanova, V., Marcé, R., Müller Schmied, H., Mouratiadou, I., Pierson, D., Tittensor, D. P., Vautard, R., van Vliet, M., Biber, M. F., Betts, R. A., Bodirsky, B. L., Deryng, D., Frolking, S., Jones, C. D., Lotze, H. K., Lotze-Campen, H., Sahajpal, R., Thonicke, K., Tian, H., and Yamagata, Y.: Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming – simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b), Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 4321–4345, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-4321-2017, 2017.
GCOS (Global Climate Observing System): Public Review of GCOS Requirements
for Essential Climate Variables Survey, GCOS Review of Requirements for
Climate Monitoring,
https://gcos.wmo.int/en/essential-climate-variables/table (last access: 20 March 2023), 2016.
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A.,
Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R.,
Kommareddy, A., Egorov, A., Chini, L., Justice, C. O., and Townshend, J. R. G.:
High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change, Science,
342, 850–853, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693, 2013.
Harper, K. L., Lamarche, C., Hartley, A., Peylin, P., Ottlé, C., Bastrikov, V., San Martín, R., Bohnenstengel, S. I., Kirches, G., Boettcher, M., Shevchuk, R., Brockmann, C., and Defourny, P.: ESA Land Cover Climate Change Initiative (Land_Cover_cci): Global Plant Functional Types (PFT) Dataset, v2.0.8, NERC EDS Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], https://doi.org/10.5285/26a0f46c95ee4c29b5c650b129aab788, 2023.
Harris, I., Jones, P. D., Osborn, T. J., and Lister, D. H.: Updated
high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10
Dataset, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 623–642, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3711, 2014.
Hartley, A. J., MacBean, N., Georgievski, G., and Bontemps, S.: Uncertainty in
plant functional type distributions and its impact on land surface models,
Remote Sens. Environ., 2013, 71–89, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.037,
2017.
Hollmann, R., Merchant, C. J., Saunders, R., Downy, C., Buchwitz, M.,
Cazenave, A., Chuvieco, E., Defourny, P., De Leeuw, G., Forsberg, R.,
Holzer-Popp, T., Paul, F., Sandven, S., Sathyendranath, S., Van Roozendael,
M., Wagner, W., others, Holzer-Popp, T., Paul, F., Sandven, S.,
Sathyendranath, S., Van Roozendael, M., and Wagner, W.: The ESA climate
change initiative: Satellite data records for essential climate variables, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
94, 1541–1552, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00254.1, 2013.
Houghton, R. A.: Aboveground forest biomass and the global carbon balance,
Glob. Change Biol., 11, 945–958, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00955.x,
2005.
Houghton, R. A., House, J. I., Pongratz, J., van der Werf, G. R., DeFries, R. S., Hansen, M. C., Le Quéré, C., and Ramankutty, N.: Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change, Biogeosciences, 9, 5125–5142, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5125-2012, 2012.
IPCC: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability.
Contribution of Working 744 Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Pörtner, O.,
Roberts, D. C., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E. S., Mintenbeck, K., and Ale, A., 2022.
Jung, M., Henkel, K., Herold, M., and Churkina, G.: Exploiting synergies of
global land cover products for carbon cycle modeling, Remote Sens. Environ.,
101, 534–553, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.01.020, 2006.
Kobayashi, S., Ota, Y., Harada, Y., Ebita, A., Moriya, M., Onoda, H., Onogi,
K., Kamahori, H., Kobayashi, C., Endo, H., Miyaoka, K., and Takahashi, K.:
The JRA-55 Reanalysis: General Specifications and Basic Characteristics,
J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 93, 5–48, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2015-001, 2015.
Krinner, G., Viovy, N., de Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Ogée, J., Polcher,
J., Friedlingstein, P., Ciais, P., Sitch, S., and Prentice, I. C.: A dynamic
global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere
system, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002199, 2005.
Lamarche, C., Santoro, M., Bontemps, S., d'Andrimont, R., Radoux, J.,
Giustarini, L., Brockmann, C., Wevers, J., Defourny, P., and Arino, O.:
Compilation and validation of sar and optical data products for a complete
and global map of inland/ocean water tailored to the climate modeling
community, 9, Remote Sens., https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9010036, 2017.
Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A.,
Bruce, J. W., Coomes, O. T., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., George, P.
S., Homewood, K., Imbernon, J., Leemans, R., Li, X., Moran, E. F.,
Mortimore, M., Ramakrishnan, P. S., Richards, J. F., Skånes, H.,
Steffen, W., Stone, G. D., Svedin, U., Veldkamp, T. A., Vogel, C., and Xu,
J.: The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths,
Global Environ. Chang., 11, 261–269,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3, 2001.
Liu, S., Bond-Lamberty, B., Boysen, L. R., Ford, J. D., Fox, A., Gallo, K.,
Hatfield, J., Henebry, G. M., Huntington, T. G., Liu, Z., Lovelan, T. R.,
Norby, R. J., Soh, T., Steiner, A. L., Yuan, W., Zhang, Z., and Zhao, S.:
Grand challenges in understanding the interplay of climate and land changes,
Earth Interact., 21, 1–43, https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-16-0012.1, 2017.
Loarie, S. R., Lobell, D. B., Asner, G. P., and Field, C. B.: Land-Cover and
surface water change drive large albedo increases in south america, Earth
Interact., 15, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010EI342.1, 2011.
Lurton, T., Balkanski, Y., Bastrikov, V., Bekki, S., Bopp, L., Braconnot, P., Brockmann, P., Cadule, P., Contoux, C., Cozic, A., Cugnet, D., Dufresne, J. L., Éthé, C., Foujols, M. A., Ghattas, J., Hauglustaine, D., Hu, R. M., Kageyama, M., Khodri, M., Lebas, N., Levavasseur, G., Marchand, M., Ottlé, C., Peylin, P., Sima, A., Szopa, S., Thiéblemont, R., Vuichard, N., and Boucher, O.: Implementation of the CMIP6 Forcing Data in the IPSL-CM6A-LR Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 12, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001940, 2020.
Mahmood, R., Pielke, R. A., Hubbard, K. G., Niyogi, D., Dirmeyer, P. A.,
Mcalpine, C., Carleton, A. M., Hale, R., Gameda, S., Beltrán-Przekurat,
A., Baker, B., Mcnider, R., Legates, D. R., Shepherd, M., Du, J., Blanken,
P. D., Frauenfeld, O. W., Nair, U. S., and Fall, S.: Land cover changes and
their biogeophysical effects on climate, Int. J. Climatol., 34, 929–953,
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3736, 2014.
Marie, G., Luyssaert, B. S., Dardel, C., Le Toan, T., Bouvet, A., Mermoz, S., Villard, L., Bastrikov, V., and Peylin, P.: Constraining a land cover map with satellite-based aboveground biomass estimates over Africa, Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 2599–2617, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-2599-2022, 2022.
Mathison, C., Burke, E., Hartley, A. J., Kelley, D. I., Burton, C., Robertson, E., Gedney, N., Williams, K., Wiltshire, A., Ellis, R. J., and others: Description and Evaluation of the JULES-ES setup for ISIMIP2b, EGUsphere, 1–24, 2022.
McGlynn, E., Li, S., Berger, M. F., Amend, M., and Harper, K. L.: Addressing
uncertainty and bias in land use, land use change, and forestry greenhouse
gas inventories, Clim. Change, 170, 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03254-2,
2022.
Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., Church, J. A., Clarke, L., Dahe, Q., Dasgupta, P., Dubash, N. K., Edenhofer, O., Elgizouli, I., Field, C. B., Forster, P., Friedlingstein, P., Fuglestvedt, J., Gomez-Echeverri, L., Hallegatte, S., Hegerl, G., Howden, M., Jiang, K., Jimenez Cisneroz, B., Kattsov, V., Lee, H., Mach, K. J., Marotzke, J., Mastrandrea, M. D., Meyer, L., Minx, J., Mulugetta, Y., O'Brien, K., Oppenheimer, M., Pereira, J. J., Pichs-Madruga, R., Plattner, G. K., Pörtner, H. O., Power, S. B., Preston, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Reisinger, A., Riahi, K., Rusticucci, M., Scholes, R., Seyboth, K., Sokona, Y., Stavins, R., Stocker, T. F., Tschakert, P., van Vuuren, D., and van Ypserle, J. P.: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Pachauri, R. and Meyer, L., Geneva, Switzerland, IPCC, 151 p., ISBN 978-92-9169-143-2, 2014.
Pekel, J.-F., Cottam, A., Gorelick, N., and Belward, A. S.: High-resolution
mapping of global surface water and its long-term changes, Nature, 540,
418–422, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20584, 2016.
Perugini, L., Caporaso, L., Marconi, S., Cescatti, A., Quesada, B., De
Noblet-Ducoudré, N., House, J. I., and Arneth, A.: Biophysical effects
on temperature and precipitation due to land cover change, Environ. Res.
Lett., 12, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa6b3f, 2017.
Pesaresi, M., Huadong, G., Blaes, X., Ehrlich, D., Ferri, S., Gueguen, L.,
Halkia, M., Kauffmann, M., Kemper, T., Lu, L., Marin-Herrera, M. A.,
Ouzounis, G. K., Scavazzon, M., Soille, P., Syrris, V., and Zanchetta, L.: A
global human settlement layer from optical HR/VHR RS data: Concept and first
results, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl., 6, 2102–2131, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2013.2271445, 2013.
Pielke, R. A.: Land use and climate change, Science, 310,
1625–1626, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1120529, 2005.
Pielke, R. A., Pitman, A., Niyogi, D., Mahmood, R., McAlpine, C., Hossain,
F., Goldewijk, K. K., Nair, U., Betts, R., Fall, S., Reichstein, M., Kabat,
P., and de Noblet, N.: Land use/land cover changes and climate: Modeling
analysis and observational evidence, Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang.,
2, 828–850, https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.144, 2011.
Pitman, A. J., De Noblet-Ducoudré, N., Cruz, F. T., Davin, E. L., Bonan,
G. B., Brovkin, V., Claussen, M., Delire, C., Ganzeveld, L., Gayler, V., Van
Den Hurk, B. J. J. M., Lawrence, P. J., Van Der Molen, M. K., Müller,
C., Reick, C. H., Seneviratne, S. I., Strengen, B. J., and Voldoire, A.:
Uncertainties in climate responses to past land cover change: First results
from the LUCID intercomparison study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, 1–6,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039076, 2009.
Plummer, S., Lecomte, P., and Doherty, M.: The ESA Climate Change Initiative
(CCI): A European contribution to the generation of the Global Climate
Observing System, Remote Sens. Environ., 203, 2–8,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.07.014, 2017.
Pongratz, J., Reick, C. H., Houghton, R. A., and House, J. I.: Terminology as a key uncertainty in net land use and land cover change carbon flux estimates, Earth Syst. Dynam., 5, 177–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-5-177-2014, 2014.
Potapov, P., Li, X., Hernandez-Serna, A., Tyukavina, A., Hansen, M.C.,
Kommareddy, A., Pickens, A., Turubanova, S., Tang, H., Edibaldo Silva, C.,
Armston, J., Dubayah, R., Blair, J. B., and Hofton, M.: Mapping global forest
canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data, Remote Sens.
Environ., 253, 112165, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2020.112165, 2021.
Poulter, B., Ciais, P., Hodson, E., Lischke, H., Maignan, F., Plummer, S., and Zimmermann, N. E.: Plant functional type mapping for earth system models, Geosci. Model Dev., 4, 993–1010, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-993-2011, 2011.
Poulter, B., MacBean, N., Hartley, A., Khlystova, I., Arino, O., Betts, R., Bontemps, S., Boettcher, M., Brockmann, C., Defourny, P., Hagemann, S., Herold, M., Kirches, G., Lamarche, C., Lederer, D., Ottlé, C., Peters, M., and Peylin, P.: Plant functional type classification for earth system models: results from the European Space Agency's Land Cover Climate Change Initiative, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2315–2328, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2315-2015, 2015.
Sampaio, G., Nobre, C., Costa, M. H., Satyamurty, P., Soares-Filho, B. S.,
and Cardoso, M.: Regional climate change over eastern Amazonia caused by
pasture and soybean cropland expansion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, 2007.
Santoro, M. and Cartus, O.: ESA Biomass Climate Change Initiative
(Biomass_cci): Global datasets of forest above-ground biomass
for the year 2017, v1, Centre for Environmental Data Analysis, https://doi.org/10.5285/bedc59f37c9545c981a839eb552e4084, 2019.
Santoro, M., Cartus, O., Carvalhais, N., Rozendaal, D. M. A., Avitabile, V., Araza, A., de Bruin, S., Herold, M., Quegan, S., Rodríguez-Veiga, P., Balzter, H., Carreiras, J., Schepaschenko, D., Korets, M., Shimada, M., Itoh, T., Moreno Martínez, Á., Cavlovic, J., Cazzolla Gatti, R., da Conceição Bispo, P., Dewnath, N., Labrière, N., Liang, J., Lindsell, J., Mitchard, E. T. A., Morel, A., Pacheco Pascagaza, A. M., Ryan, C. M., Slik, F., Vaglio Laurin, G., Verbeeck, H., Wijaya, A., and Willcock, S.: The global forest above-ground biomass pool for 2010 estimated from high-resolution satellite observations, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3927–3950, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3927-2021, 2021.
Sayre, R., Dangermond, J., Frye, C., Vaughan, R., Aniello, P., Breyer, S.,
Cribbs, D., Hopkins, D., Nauman, R., Derrenbacher, W., Wright, D., Brown,
C., Convis, C., Smith, J., Benson, L., VanSistine, D.P., Warner, H., Cress,
J., Danielson, J., Hamann, S., Cecere, T., Reddy, A., Burton, D., Grosse,
A., True, D., Metzger, M., Hartmann, J., N. Moosdorf, N.,
Dürr, H., Paganini, M., Defourny, P., Arino, O., Maynard,
S., Anderson, M., and Comer, P.: A New Map of Global Ecological Land Units
– An Ecophysiographic Stratification Approach, Association of American
Geographers, Washington, DC, ISBN 978-0-89291-276-6, 2014.
Sessa, R.: Terrestrial Essential Climate Variables: For Climate Change
Assessment, Mitigation and Adaptation, FAO, edited by: Dolman, H., Rome:
GTOS-Secr., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, https://www.fao.org/3/i0197e/i0197e.pdf (last access: 20 March 2023), 2008.
Stehfest, E., van Vuuren, D., Kram, T., Bouwman, L., Alkemade, R., Bakkenes,
M., Biemans, H., Bouwman, A., den Elzen, M., Janse, J., Lucas, P., van
Minnen, J., Müller, C., and Prins, A. G.: Integrated Assessment of
Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0. Model description and policy
applications, 370 pp., Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), 2014.
Turner, B. L., Moss, R. H., and Skole, D. L.: Relating land use and global
land-cover change: a proposal for an IGBP-HDP core project, A report from
the IGBP/HDP Working Group on Land-Use/Land-Cover Change, Stockholm: Royal Swedish Academy of Scie, IGBP Secretariat,
65 pp., 1993.
UNFCCC: Annex to Report of the Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first
session, held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015, Addendum. Part
two: Action taken by the Conference of the Parties at its twenty-first
session, FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1 pp., 2016.
University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit and Harris, I. C.: CRU JRA
v2.0: A forcings dataset of gridded land surface blend of Climatic Research
Unit (CRU) and Japanese reanalysis (JRA) data, January 1901–December 2018, Centre
for Environmental Data Analysis, https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/7f785c0e80aa4df2b39d068ce7351bbb (last access: 20 March 2023),
2019.
Vitousek, P. M., Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H., and Matson, P. A.: Human
Appropriation of the Products of Photosynthesis, Bioscience, 36, 368–373,
1986.
Short summary
We built a spatially explicit annual plant-functional-type (PFT) dataset for 1992–2020 exhibiting intra-class spatial variability in PFT fractional cover at 300 m. For each year, 14 maps of percentage cover are produced: bare soil, water, permanent snow/ice, built, managed grasses, natural grasses, and trees and shrubs, each split into leaf type and seasonality. Model simulations indicate significant differences in simulated carbon, water, and energy fluxes in some regions using this new set.
We built a spatially explicit annual plant-functional-type (PFT) dataset for 1992–2020...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint