Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-517-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-517-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description paper
| 
07 Feb 2025
Data description paper |
| 07 Feb 2025
| 07 Feb 2025
A China dataset of soil properties for land surface modelling (version 2, CSDLv2)
Gaosong Shi
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Wenye Sun
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Zhongwang Wei
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Hua Yuan
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Lu Li
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Xiaolin Sun
School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Ye Zhang
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Hongbin Liang
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Danxi Li
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Feini Huang
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Qingliang Li
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
College of Computer Science and Technology, Changchun Normal University, Changchun 130032, China
Yongjiu Dai
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Climate Change and Natural Disaster Studies, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Related authors
No articles found.
Zhongwang Wei, Qingchen Xu, Fan Bai, Xionghui Xu, Zixin Wei, Wenzong Dong, Hongbin Liang, Nan Wei, Xingjie Lu, Lu Li, Shupeng Zhang, Hua Yuan, Laibao Liu, and Yongjiu Dai
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 6517–6540, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6517-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6517-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Land surface models are used for simulating how Earth's surface interacts with the atmosphere. As models grow more complex and detailed, researchers need better tools to evaluate their performance. OpenBench, a new software system that makes the evaluation process more comprehensive and efficient, stands out by incorporating various factors and working with data at any scale, enabling scientists to incorporate new types of models and measurements as our understanding of Earth's systems evolves.
Chen Yang, Aoqi Sun, Shupeng Zhang, Yongjiu Dai, Stefan Kollet, and Reed Maxwell
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3935, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3935, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Groundwater strongly influences how water and energy move between land and air, yet most large-scale climate and Earth system models treat it too simply. We reviewed 20 years of work combining a detailed groundwater model, ParFlow, with land surface models, showing ways groundwater shapes energy and water cycles. We also updated this model link, improving its performance, and proposed a flexible framework to support future advances.
Shuyang Guo, Yongjiu Dai, Hua Yuan, and Hongbin Liang
The Cryosphere, 19, 3553–3570, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3553-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-19-3553-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Snow, Ice, and Aerosol Radiation Model version 4 has only been used to evaluate bare-ice albedo in land surface models, with necessary ice property data lacking quality control. We integrated this model into our land surface model and improved bare-ice properties using quality-controlled satellite data. Our findings show regional warming and reduced snow cover in Greenland’s bare-ice region, driven by changes in bare-ice properties through bare-ice–snow albedo feedback.
Shiao Feng, Wenhong Wang, Yonggen Zhang, Zhongwang Wei, Jianzhi Dong, Lutz Weihermüller, and Harry Vereecken
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-410, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-410, 2025
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Soil moisture is key for weather, farming, and ecosystems, but global datasets have gaps and biases. We compared three products against 1,615 stations with more than 1.9 million measured moisture, finding ERA5-Land highly correlated but biased high, and SMAP-L4 accurate but short-term. Fusing them created an enhanced dataset, improving correlation by 5%, reducing errors by 20%, and enhancing overall fit by 15%. This seamless resource aids drought tracking, water planning, and climate adaptation.
Shulei Zhang, Hongbin Liang, Fang Li, Xingjie Lu, and Yongjiu Dai
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3119–3143, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3119-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3119-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study enhances irrigation modeling in the Common Land Model by capturing the full irrigation process, detailing water supplies from various sources, and enabling bidirectional coupling between water demand and supply. The proposed model accurately simulates irrigation water withdrawals, energy fluxes, river flow, and crop yields. It offers insights into irrigation-related climate impacts and water scarcity, contributing to sustainable water management and improved Earth system modeling.
Weilin Liao, Yanman Li, Xiaoping Liu, Yuhao Wang, Yangzi Che, Ledi Shao, Guangzhao Chen, Hua Yuan, Ning Zhang, and Fei Chen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2535–2551, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2535-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2535-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The currently available urban canopy parameter (UCP) datasets are limited to just a few cities for urban climate simulations by the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. To address this gap, we develop a global 1 km spatially continuous UCP dataset (GloUCP) which provides superior spatial coverage and higher accuracy in capturing urban morphology across diverse regions. It has great potential to support further advancements in urban climate modeling and related applications.
Chen Yang, Zitong Jia, Wenjie Xu, Zhongwang Wei, Xiaolang Zhang, Yiguang Zou, Jeffrey McDonnell, Laura Condon, Yongjiu Dai, and Reed Maxwell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 2201–2218, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2201-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-2201-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We developed the first high-resolution, integrated surface water–groundwater hydrologic model of the entirety of continental China using ParFlow. The model shows good performance in terms of streamflow and water table depth when compared to global data products and observations. It is essential for water resources management and decision-making in China within a consistent framework in the changing world. It also has significant implications for similar modeling in other places in the world.
Jiahao Shi, Hua Yuan, Wanyi Lin, Wenzong Dong, Hongbin Liang, Zhuo Liu, Jianxin Zeng, Haolin Zhang, Nan Wei, Zhongwang Wei, Shupeng Zhang, Shaofeng Liu, Xingjie Lu, and Yongjiu Dai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 117–134, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-117-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-117-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Flux tower data are widely recognized as benchmarking data for land surface models, but insufficient emphasis on and deficiency in site attribute data limits their true value. We collect site-observed vegetation, soil, and topography data from various sources. The final dataset encompasses 90 sites globally, with relatively complete site attribute data and high-quality flux validation data. This work has provided more reliable site attribute data, benefiting land surface model development.
Yangzi Che, Xuecao Li, Xiaoping Liu, Yuhao Wang, Weilin Liao, Xianwei Zheng, Xucai Zhang, Xiaocong Xu, Qian Shi, Jiajun Zhu, Honghui Zhang, Hua Yuan, and Yongjiu Dai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5357–5374, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5357-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5357-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Most existing building height products are limited with respect to either spatial resolution or coverage, not to mention the spatial heterogeneity introduced by global building forms. Using Earth Observation (EO) datasets for 2020, we developed a global height dataset at the individual building scale. The dataset provides spatially explicit information on 3D building morphology, supporting both macro- and microanalysis of urban areas.
Liqing Peng, Justin Sheffield, Zhongwang Wei, Michael Ek, and Eric F. Wood
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1277–1300, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1277-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1277-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Integrating evaporative demand into drought indicators is effective, but the choice of method and the effectiveness of surface features remain undocumented. We evaluate various methods and surface features for predicting soil moisture dynamics. Using minimal ancillary information alongside meteorological and vegetation data, we develop a simple land-cover-based method that improves soil moisture drought predictions, especially in forests, showing promise for better real-time drought forecasting.
Qingliang Li, Gaosong Shi, Wei Shangguan, Vahid Nourani, Jianduo Li, Lu Li, Feini Huang, Ye Zhang, Chunyan Wang, Dagang Wang, Jianxiu Qiu, Xingjie Lu, and Yongjiu Dai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5267–5286, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5267-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5267-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
SMCI1.0 is a 1 km resolution dataset of daily soil moisture over China for 2000–2020 derived through machine learning trained with in situ measurements of 1789 stations, meteorological forcings, and land surface variables. It contains 10 soil layers with 10 cm intervals up to 100 cm deep. Evaluated by in situ data, the error (ubRMSE) ranges from 0.045 to 0.051, and the correlation (R) range is 0.866-0.893. Compared with ERA5-Land, SMAP-L4, and SoMo.ml, SIMI1.0 has higher accuracy and resolution.
Yi Nan, Zhihua He, Fuqiang Tian, Zhongwang Wei, and Lide Tian
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4147–4167, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4147-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4147-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Tracer-aided hydrological models are useful tool to reduce uncertainty of hydrological modeling in cold basins, but there is little guidance on the sampling strategy for isotope analysis, which is important for large mountainous basins. This study evaluated the reliance of the tracer-aided modeling performance on the availability of isotope data in the Yarlung Tsangpo river basin, and provides implications for collecting water isotope data for running tracer-aided hydrological models.
Ziqi Lin, Yongjiu Dai, Umakant Mishra, Guocheng Wang, Wei Shangguan, Wen Zhang, and Zhangcai Qin
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-232, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2022-232, 2022
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Spatial soil organic carbon (SOC) data is critical for predictions in carbon climate feedbacks and future climate trends, but no conclusion has yet been reached on which dataset to be used for specific purposes. We evaluated the SOC estimates from five widely used global soil datasets and a regional permafrost dataset, and identify uncertainties of SOC estimates by region, biome, and data sources, hoping to help improve SOC/soil data in the future.
Yaoping Wang, Jiafu Mao, Mingzhou Jin, Forrest M. Hoffman, Xiaoying Shi, Stan D. Wullschleger, and Yongjiu Dai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4385–4405, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4385-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4385-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We developed seven global soil moisture datasets (1970–2016, monthly, half-degree, and multilayer) by merging a wide range of data sources, including in situ and satellite observations, reanalysis, offline land surface model simulations, and Earth system model simulations. Given the great value of long-term, multilayer, gap-free soil moisture products to climate research and applications, we believe this paper and the presented datasets would be of interest to many different communities.
Richard Essery, Hyungjun Kim, Libo Wang, Paul Bartlett, Aaron Boone, Claire Brutel-Vuilmet, Eleanor Burke, Matthias Cuntz, Bertrand Decharme, Emanuel Dutra, Xing Fang, Yeugeniy Gusev, Stefan Hagemann, Vanessa Haverd, Anna Kontu, Gerhard Krinner, Matthieu Lafaysse, Yves Lejeune, Thomas Marke, Danny Marks, Christoph Marty, Cecile B. Menard, Olga Nasonova, Tomoko Nitta, John Pomeroy, Gerd Schädler, Vladimir Semenov, Tatiana Smirnova, Sean Swenson, Dmitry Turkov, Nander Wever, and Hua Yuan
The Cryosphere, 14, 4687–4698, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4687-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-4687-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Climate models are uncertain in predicting how warming changes snow cover. This paper compares 22 snow models with the same meteorological inputs. Predicted trends agree with observations at four snow research sites: winter snow cover does not start later, but snow now melts earlier in spring than in the 1980s at two of the sites. Cold regions where snow can last until late summer are predicted to be particularly sensitive to warming because the snow then melts faster at warmer times of year.
Cited articles
Adhikari, K., Kheir, R. B., Greve, M. B., Bøcher, P. K., Malone, B. P., Minasny, B., McBratney, A. B., and Greve, M. H.: High-Resolution 3-D Mapping of Soil Texture in Denmark, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 77, 860–876, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2012.0275, 2013.
Al-Naji, A., Fakhri, A. B., Gharghan, S. K., and Chahl, J.: Soil color analysis based on a RGB camera and an artificial neural network towards smart irrigation: A pilot study, Heliyon, 7, e06078, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06078, 2021.
Arrouays, D., Grundy, M. G., Hartemink, A. E., Hempel, J. W., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Hong, S. Y., Lagacherie, P., Lelyk, G., McBratney, A. B., McKenzie, N. J., Mendonca-Santos, M. d.L., Minasny, B., Montanarella, L., Odeh, I. O. A., Sanchez, P. A., Thompson, J. A., and Zhang, G.-L.: GlobalSoilMap: Toward a Fine-Resolution Global Grid of Soil Properties, in: Advances in Agronomy, vol. 125, Elsevier, 93–134, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800137-0.00003-0, 2014a.
Arrouays, D., McKenzie, N., Hempel, J., Richer de Forges, A., and McBratney, A. B. (Eds.): GlobalSoilMap: Basis of the global spatial soil information system, 1st edn., CRC Press, https://doi.org/10.1201/b16500, 2014b.
Arrouays, D., McKenzie, N. J., and Hartemink, A. E.: The GlobalSoilMap project specifications D. Notes, in: Proceedings of the 1st GlobalSoilMap Conference, Orléans, France, 7–9 October 2013, https://www.iuss.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/iuss_bulletin_123.pdf (last access: 25 July 2024), 2015.
Arrouays, D., Savin, I., Leenaars, J., and McBratney, A. B.: GlobalSoilMap-Digital Soil Mapping from Country to Globe, in: Proceedings of the Global Soil Map 2017 Conference, Moscow, Russia, 4–6 July 2017, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781351239707, 2017.
Batjes, N. H.: A global data set of soil pH properties, Tech. Pap., 27, Int. Soil Ref. and Int. Soil Ref. And Inf. Cent (ISRIC), Wageningen, Netherlands, https://www.isric.org/sites/default/files/ISRIC_TechPap27.pdf (last access: 25 July 2024), 1995.
Batjes, N. H.: Soil parameter estimates for the soil types of the world for use in global and regional modelling (Version 2.1), ISRIC Rep. 2002/02c, Int. Food Policy Res. Inst. (IFPRI) and Int. Soil Ref. Inf. Cent. (ISRIC), Wageningen, Netherlands, https://www.isric.org/sites/default/files/isric_report_2002_02c.pdf (last access: 25 July 2024), 2002.
Batjes, N. H., Ribeiro, E., and van Oostrum, A.: Standardised soil profile data to support global mapping and modelling (WoSIS snapshot 2019), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 299–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-299-2020, 2020.
Beillouin, D., Demenois, J., Cardinael, R., Berre, D., Corbeels, M., Fallot, A., Boyer, A., and Feder, F.: A global database of land management, land-use change and climate change effects on soil organic carbon, Sci. Data, 9, 228, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01318-1, 2022.
Bishop, T. F. A., McBratney, A. B., and Laslett, G. M.: Modelling soil attribute depth functions with equal-area quadratic smoothing splines, Geoderma, 91, 27–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00003-8, 1999.
Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Machine Learning, 45, 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324, 2001.
Brus, D. J., Kempen, B., and Heuvelink, G. B. M.: Sampling for validation of digital soil maps, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 62, 394–407, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2011.01364.x, 2011.
Chen, S., Li, L., Wei, Z., Wei, N., Zhang, Y., Zhang, S., Yuan, H., Shangguan, W., Zhang, S., Li, Q., and Dai, Y.: Exploring Topography Downscaling Methods for Hyper‐Resolution Land Surface Modeling, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2024JD041338, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041338, 2024.
Chaney, N. W., Minasny, B., Herman, J. D., Nauman, T. W., Brungard, C. W., Morgan, C. L. S., McBratney, A. B., Wood, E. F., and Yimam, Y.: POLARIS Soil Properties: 30-m Probabilistic Maps of Soil Properties Over the Contiguous United States, Water Resour. Res., 55, 2916–2938, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022797, 2019.
Chen, S., Liang, Z., Webster, R., Zhang, G., Zhou, Y., Teng, H., Hu, B., Arrouays, D., and Shi, Z.: A high-resolution map of soil pH in China made by hybrid modelling of sparse soil data and environmental covariates and its implications for pollution, Sci. Total Environ., 655, 273–283, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.230, 2019.
Chen, Z., Shuai, Q., Shi, Z., Arrouays, D., Richer-de-Forges, A. C., and Chen, S.: National-scale mapping of soil organic carbon stock in France: New insights and lessons learned by direct and indirect approaches, Soil & Environmental Health, 1, 100049, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seh.2023.100049, 2023.
Conrad, O., Bechtel, B., Bock, M., Dietrich, H., Fischer, E., Gerlitz, L., Wehberg, J., Wichmann, V., and Böhner, J.: System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1991–2007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015, 2015.
Crow, W. T., Berg, A. A., Cosh, M. H., Loew, A., Mohanty, B. P., Panciera, R., De Rosnay, P., Ryu, D., and Walker, J. P.: Upscaling sparse ground-based soil moisture observations for the validation of coarse-resolution satellite soil moisture products, Rev. Geophys., 50, 2011RG000372, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011RG000372, 2012.
DAAC, O.: MODIS and VIIRS Land Products Global Subsetting and Visualization Tool. In, https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov (last access: 3 April 2024), 2018.
Dai, Y., Shangguan, W., Wei, N., Xin, Q., Yuan, H., Zhang, S., Liu, S., Lu, X., Wang, D., and Yan, F.: A review of the global soil property maps for Earth system models, SOIL, 5, 137–158, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-5-137-2019, 2019b.
Dinamarca, D. I., Galleguillos, M., Seguel, O., and Faúndez Urbina, C.: CLSoilMaps: A national soil gridded database of physical and hydraulic soil properties for Chile, Sci. Data, 10, 630, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02536-x, 2023.
Fan, J., Wu, L., Zhang, F., Xiang, Y., and Zheng, J.: Climate change effects on reference crop evapotranspiration across different climatic zones of China during 1956–2015, J. Hydrol., 542, 923–937, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.060, 2016.
FAO and IIASA: Harmonized World Soil Database version 2.0, FAO, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) [data set], https://doi.org/10.4060/cc3823en, 2023.
Ge, N., Wei, X., Wang, X., Liu, X., Shao, M., Jia, X., Li, X., and Zhang, Q.: Soil texture determines the distribution of aggregate-associated carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous under two contrasting land use types in the Loess Plateau, CATENA, 172, 148–157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.08.021, 2019.
Gomes, L. C., Faria, R. M., de Souza, E., Veloso, G. V., Schaefer, C. E. G., and Fernandes Filho, E. I.: Modelling and mapping soil organic carbon stocks in Brazil, Geoderma, 340, 337–350, 2019.
Gong, C., Ma, L., Cheng, H., Liu, Y., Xu, D., Li, B., Liu, F., Ren, Y., Liu, Z., Zhao, C., Yang, K., Nie, H., and Lang, C.: Characterization of the particle size fraction associated heavy metals in tropical arable soils from Hainan Island, China, J. Geochem. Explor., 139, 109–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2013.01.002, 2014.
Grundy, M. J., Rossel, R. A. V., Searle, R. D., Wilson, P. L., Chen, C., and Gregory, L. J.: Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia, Soil Res., 53, 835, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR15191, 2015.
Guo, J., Wang, K., and Jin, S.: Mapping of Soil pH Based on SVM-RFE Feature Selection Algorithm, Agronomy, 12, 2742, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112742, 2022.
Gyamerah, S. A., Ngare, P., and Ikpe, D.: Probabilistic forecasting of crop yields via quantile random forest and Epanechnikov Kernel function, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 280, 107808, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.107808, 2020.
Hartmann, J. and Moosdorf, N.: Global Lithological Map Database v1.0 (gridded to 0.5° spatial resolution), PANGAEA [data set], https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.788537, 2012.
Helfenstein, A., Mulder, V. L., Heuvelink, G. B. M., and Hack-ten Broeke, M. J. D.: Three-dimensional space and time mapping reveals soil organic matter decreases across anthropogenic landscapes in the Netherlands, Commun. Earth Environ., 5, 130, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01293-y, 2024a.
Helfenstein, A., Mulder, V. L., Hack-ten Broeke, M. J. D., Van Doorn, M., Teuling, K., Walvoort, D. J. J., and Heuvelink, G. B. M.: BIS-4D: mapping soil properties and their uncertainties at 25 m resolution in the Netherlands, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2941–2970, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2941-2024, 2024b.
Hengl, T., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kempen, B., Leenaars, J. G. B., Walsh, M. G., Shepherd, K. D., Sila, A., MacMillan, R. A., Mendes De Jesus, J., Tamene, L., and Tondoh, J. E.: Mapping Soil Properties of Africa at 250 m Resolution: Random Forests Significantly Improve Current Predictions, PLoS ONE, 10, e0125814, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125814, 2015.
Hengl, T., Mendes De Jesus, J., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Ruiperez Gonzalez, M., Kilibarda, M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X., Bauer-Marschallinger, B., Guevara, M. A., Vargas, R., MacMillan, R. A., Batjes, N. H., Leenaars, J. G. B., Ribeiro, E., Wheeler, I., Mantel, S., and Kempen, B.: SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning, PLoS ONE, 12, e0169748, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748, 2017.
Hengl, T., Miller, M. A. E., Križan, J., Shepherd, K. D., Sila, A., Kilibarda, M., Antonijević, O., Glušica, L., Dobermann, A., Haefele, S. M., McGrath, S. P., Acquah, G. E., Collinson, J., Parente, L., Sheykhmousa, M., Saito, K., Johnson, J.-M., Chamberlin, J., Silatsa, F. B. T., Yemefack, M., Wendt, J., MacMillan, R. A., Wheeler, I., and Crouch, J.: African soil properties and nutrients mapped at 30 m spatial resolution using two-scale ensemble machine learning, Sci. Rep., 11, 6130, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85639-y, 2021.
Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kros, J., Reinds, G. J., and De Vries, W.: Geostatistical prediction and simulation of European soil property maps, Geoderma Regional, 7, 201–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.04.002, 2016.
Hu, B., Xie, M., Shi, Z., Li, H., Chen, S., Wang, Z., Zhou, Y., Ni, H., Geng, Y., Zhu, Q., and Zhang, X.: Fine-resolution mapping of cropland topsoil pH of Southern China and its environmental application, Geoderma, 442, 116798, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116798, 2024.
Karger, D. N., Schmatz, D. R., Dettling, G., and Zimmermann, N. E.: High-resolution monthly precipitation and temperature time series from 2006 to 2100, Sci. Data, 7, 248, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00587-y, 2020.
Katschinski, N. A.: Die mechanische Bodenanalyse und die Klassifikation der Böden nach ihrer mechanischen Zusammensetzung, Pari, B, 321–327, 1956.
Koenker, R.: Quantile Regression, Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754098, 2005.
Krause, P., Boyle, D. P., and Bäse, F.: Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment, Adv. Geosci., 5, 89–97, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005, 2005.
Lagacherie, P., Arregui, M., and Fages, D.: Evaluating the quality of soil legacy data used as input of digital soil mapping models, Eur. J. Soil Sci., 75, e13463, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13463, 2024.
Lamichhane, S., Kumar, L., and Wilson, B.: Digital soil mapping algorithms and covariates for soil organic carbon mapping and their implications: A review, Geoderma, 352, 395–413, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.05.031, 2019.
Li, Q., Zhang, C., Shangguan, W., Li, L., and Dai, Y.: A novel local-global dependency deep learning model for soil mapping, Geoderma, 438, 116649, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116649, 2023.
Li, T., Cui, L., Kuhnert, M., McLaren, T. I., Pandey, R., Liu, H., Wang, W., Xu, Z., Xia, A., Dalal, R. C., and Dang, Y. P.: A comprehensive review of soil organic carbon estimates: Integrating remote sensing and machine learning technologies, J. Soil. Sediment., 24, 3556–3571, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-024-03913-8, 2024.
Li, W., Wei, N., Huang L., and Shangguan W.: Impact of Soil Datasets on the Global Simulation of Land Surface Processes, Climatic and Environmental Research, 25, 555–574, https://doi.org/10.3878/j.issn.1006-9585.2020.20025, 2020 (in Chinese).
Liang, Z., Chen, S., Yang, Y., Zhao, R., Shi, Z., and Viscarra Rossel, R. A.: National digital soil map of organic matter in topsoil and its associated uncertainty in 1980's China, Geoderma, 335, 47–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.08.011, 2019.
Lilburne, L., Helfenstein, A., Heuvelink, G. B. M., and Eger, A.: Interpreting and evaluating digital soil mapping prediction uncertainty: A case study using texture from SoilGrids, Geoderma, 450, 117052, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117052, 2024.
Liu, F., Zhang, G.-L., Song, X., Li, D., Zhao, Y., Yang, J., Wu, H., and Yang, F.: High-resolution and three-dimensional mapping of soil texture of China, Geoderma, 361, 114061, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114061, 2020.
Liu, F., Wu, H., Zhao, Y., Li, D., Yang, J.-L., Song, X., Shi, Z., Zhu, A.-X., and Zhang, G.-L.: Mapping high resolution National Soil Information Grids of China, Sci. Bull., 67, 328–340, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2021.10.013, 2022a.
Liu, F., Yang, F., Zhao, Y., Zhang, G., and Li, D.: Predicting soil depth in a large and complex area using machine learning and environmental correlations, J. Integr. Agr., 21, 2422–2434, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63692-4, 2022b.
Lu, Q., Tian, S., and Wei, L.: Digital mapping of soil pH and carbonates at the European scale using environmental variables and machine learning, Sci. Total Environ., 856, 159171, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159171, 2023.
Luo, Y., Ahlström, A., Allison, S. D., Batjes, N. H., Brovkin, V., Carvalhais, N., Chappell, A., Ciais, P., Davidson, E. A., Finzi, A., Georgiou, K., Guenet, B., Hararuk, O., Harden, J. W., He, Y., Hopkins, F., Jiang, L., Koven, C., Jackson, R. B., Jones, C. D., Lara, M. J., Liang, J., McGuire, A. D., Parton, W., Peng, C., Randerson, J. T., Salazar, A., Sierra, C. A., Smith, M. J., Tian, H., Todd-Brown, K. E. O., Torn, M., Van Groenigen, K. J., Wang, Y. P., West, T. O., Wei, Y., Wieder, W. R., Xia, J., Xu, X., Xu, X., and Zhou, T.: Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 40–56, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005239, 2016.
Ma, Y., Minasny, B., McBratney, A., Poggio, L., and Fajardo, M.: Predicting soil properties in 3D: Should depth be a covariate?, Geoderma, 383, 114794, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114794, 2021.
McBratney, A. B., Mendonça Santos, M. L., and Minasny, B.: On Digital Soil Mapping, Geoderma, 117, 3–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00223-4, 2003.
McBratney, A. B., Minasny, B., and Stockmann, U. (Eds.): Pedometrics, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63439-5, 2018.
Meinshausen, N.: Quantile Regression Forests, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 7, 983–999, 2006.
Moreira De Sousa, L., Poggio, L., and Kempen, B.: Comparison of FOSS4G Supported Equal-Area Projections Using Discrete Distortion Indicatrices, ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 8, 351, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8080351, 2019.
Mulder, V. L., Lacoste, M., Richer-de-Forges, A. C., and Arrouays, D.: GlobalSoilMap France: High-resolution spatial modelling the soils of France up to two meter depth, Sci. Total Environ., 573, 1352–1369, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.066, 2016.
Nachtergaele, F. O., van Velthuizen, H., Verelst, L., Batjes, N. H., Dijkshoorn, J. A., van Engelen, V. W. P., Fischer, G., Jones, A., Montanarella, L., Petri, M., Prieler, S., Teixeira, E., Wilberg, D., and Shi, X.: Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.0), ISMC [data set], https://soil-modeling.org/resources-links/data-portal/harmonized-world-soil-database, 2012.
National Soil Survey Office: Agricultural Soils in China, China Agricultural Press, Beijing, 1964.
National Soil Survey Office: Chinese Soil Genus Records, vol. 6, China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 1996 (in Chinese).
Nauman, T. W. and Duniway, M. C.: Relative prediction intervals reveal larger uncertainty in 3D approaches to predictive digital soil mapping of soil properties with legacy data, Geoderma, 347, 170–184, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.037, 2019.
Nussbaum, M., Spiess, K., Baltensweiler, A., Grob, U., Keller, A., Greiner, L., Schaepman, M. E., and Papritz, A.: Evaluation of digital soil mapping approaches with large sets of environmental covariates, SOIL, 4, 1–22, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-4-1-2018, 2018.
Padarian, J., Minasny, B., and McBratney, A. B.: Chile and the Chilean soil grid: A contribution to GlobalSoilMap, Geoderma Regional, 9, 17–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.12.001, 2017.
Padarian, J., Minasny, B., and McBratney, A. B.: Machine learning and soil sciences: a review aided by machine learning tools, SOIL, 6, 35–52, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-35-2020, 2020.
Piikki, K., Söderström, M., and Stadig, H.: Local adaptation of a national digital soil map for use in precision agriculture, Advances in Animal Biosciences, 8, 430–432, https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040470017000966, 2017.
Poggio, L., de Sousa, L. M., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kempen, B., Ribeiro, E., and Rossiter, D.: SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty, SOIL, 7, 217–240, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-217-2021, 2021.
Qin, D., Ding, Y., and Mu, M. (Eds.): Climate and environmental change in China: 1951–2012, Springer, Berlin; Heidelberg, 152 pp., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48482-1, 2016.
Ramcharan, A., Hengl, T., Nauman, T., Brungard, C., Waltman, S., Wills, S., and Thompson, J.: Soil Property and Class Maps of the Conterminous United States at 100-Meter Spatial Resolution, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 82, 186–201, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.04.0122, 2018.
Shangguan, W., Dai, Y., Liu, B., Ye, A., and Yuan, H.: A soil particle-size distribution dataset for regional land and climate modelling in China, Geoderma, 171–172, 85–91, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.01.013, 2012.
Shangguan, W., Dai, Y., Liu, B., Zhu, A., Duan, Q., Wu, L., Ji, D., Ye, A., Yuan, H., Zhang, Q., Chen, D., Chen, M., Chu, J., Dou, Y., Guo, J., Li, H., Li, J., Liang, L., Liang, X., Liu, H., Liu, S., Miao, C., and Zhang, Y.: A China data set of soil properties for land surface modeling, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 5, 212–224, https://doi.org/10.1002/jame.20026, 2013.
Shangguan, W., Dai, Y., Duan, Q., Liu, B., and Yuan, H.: A global soil data set for earth system modeling, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 249–263, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000293, 2014.
Shi, G. and Shangguan, W.: A China dataset of soil properties for land surface modeling (version 2), National Tibetan Plateau/Third Pole Environment Data Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.11888/Terre.tpdc.301235, 2024.
Shi, G. and Shangguan, W.: shgsong/CSDLv2: A China dataset of soil properties for land surface modeling (version 2, CSDLv2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14783774, 2025.
Shi, G., Shangguan, W., Zhang, Y., Li, Q., Wang, C., and Li, L.: Reducing location error of legacy soil profiles leads to improvement in digital soil mapping, Geoderma, 447, 116912, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116912, 2024.
Shiri, J., Keshavarzi, A., Kisi, O., Iturraran-Viveros, U., Bagherzadeh, A., Mousavi, R., and Karimi, S.: Modeling soil cation exchange capacity using soil parameters: Assessing the heuristic models, Comput. Electron. Agr., 135, 242–251, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.02.016, 2017.
Song, X.-D., Wu, H.-Y., Ju, B., Liu, F., Yang, F., Li, D.-C., Zhao, Y.-G., Yang, J.-L., and Zhang, G.-L.: Pedoclimatic zone-based three-dimensional soil organic carbon mapping in China, Geoderma, 363, 114145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114145, 2020.
Sun, Y., Ma, J., Zhao, W., Qu, Y., Gou, Z., Chen, H., Tian, Y., and Wu, F.: Digital mapping of soil organic carbon density in China using an ensemble model, Environ. Res., 231, 116131, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116131, 2023.
Thompson, J. A., Kienast-Brown, S., D'Avello, T., Philippe, J., and Brungard, C.: Soils2026 and digital soil mapping – A foundation for the future of soils information in the United States, Geoderma Regional, 22, e00294, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00294, 2020.
Viscarra Rossel, R. A., Chen, C., Grundy, M. J., Searle, R., Clifford, D., and Campbell, P. H.: The Australian three-dimensional soil grid: Australia's contribution to the GlobalSoilMap project, Soil Res., 53, 845, https://doi.org/10.1071/SR14366, 2015.
Xia, C. and Zhang, Y.: Comparison of the use of Landsat 8, Sentinel-2, and Gaofen-2 images for mapping soil pH in Dehui, northeastern China, Ecol. Inform., 70, 101705, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101705, 2022.
Yamashita, N., Ohnuki, Y., Iwahashi, J., and Imaya, A.: National-scale mapping of soil-thickness probability in hilly and mountainous areas of Japan using legacy and modern soil survey, Geoderma, 446, 116896, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.116896, 2024.
Yamazaki, D., Ikeshima, D., Sosa, J., Bates, P. D., Allen, G. H., and Pavelsky, T. M.: MERIT Hydro: A High-Resolution Global Hydrography Map Based on Latest Topography Dataset, Water Resour. Res., 55, 5053–5073, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR024873, 2019.
Yan, F., Shangguan, W., Zhang, J., and Hu, B.: Depth-to-bedrock map of China at a spatial resolution of 100 meters, Sci. Data, 7, 2, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0345-6, 2020.
Yang, J., Guan, X., Luo, M., and Wang, T.: Cross-system legacy data applied to digital soil mapping: A case study of Second National Soil Survey data in China, Geoderma Regional, 28, e00489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2022.e00489, 2022.
Zhang, Z., Ding, J., Zhu, C., Wang, J., Ge, X., Li, X., Han, L., Chen, X., and Wang, J.: Historical and future variation of soil organic carbon in China, Geoderma, 436, 116557, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116557, 2023b.
Zhou, Y., Xue, J., Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Liang, Z., Wang, N., and Shi, Z.: Fine-Resolution Mapping of Soil Total Nitrogen across China Based on Weighted Model Averaging, Remote Sensing, 12, 85, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12010085, 2019a.
Zhou, Y., Hartemink, A. E., Shi, Z., Liang, Z., and Lu, Y.: Land use and climate change effects on soil organic carbon in North and Northeast China, Sci. Total Environ., 647, 1230–1238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.016, 2019b.
Short summary
In this study, we developed the second version of China's high-resolution soil information grid using legacy soil samples and advanced machine learning. This version predicts over 20 soil properties at six depths, providing accurate soil variation maps across China. It outperforms previous versions and global products, offering valuable data for hydrological and ecological analyses and Earth system modelling, enhancing our understanding of soil roles in environmental processes.
In this study, we developed the second version of China's high-resolution soil information grid...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint