Articles | Volume 15, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3163-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3163-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description paper
| 
26 Jul 2023
Data description paper |
| 26 Jul 2023
| 26 Jul 2023
Global physics-based database of injection-induced seismicity
Iman R. Kivi
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Global Change Research Group (GCRG), IMEDEA, CSIC-UIB, Esporles, Spain
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research, Spanish
National Research Council (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Associated Unit: Hydrogeology Group (UPC-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Auregan Boyet
Global Change Research Group (GCRG), IMEDEA, CSIC-UIB, Esporles, Spain
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research, Spanish
National Research Council (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Associated Unit: Hydrogeology Group (UPC-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Haiqing Wu
Associated Unit: Hydrogeology Group (UPC-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (DECA), Universitat
Politécnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barcelona, Spain
Linus Walter
Global Change Research Group (GCRG), IMEDEA, CSIC-UIB, Esporles, Spain
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research, Spanish
National Research Council (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Associated Unit: Hydrogeology Group (UPC-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Sara Hanson-Hedgecock
Global Change Research Group (GCRG), IMEDEA, CSIC-UIB, Esporles, Spain
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research, Spanish
National Research Council (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Associated Unit: Hydrogeology Group (UPC-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Francesco Parisio
Global Change Research Group (GCRG), IMEDEA, CSIC-UIB, Esporles, Spain
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research, Spanish
National Research Council (IDAEA-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Associated Unit: Hydrogeology Group (UPC-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Victor Vilarrasa
Global Change Research Group (GCRG), IMEDEA, CSIC-UIB, Esporles, Spain
Associated Unit: Hydrogeology Group (UPC-CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
Related authors
No articles found.
Tian Guo, Dmitry Alexandrov, Leo Eisner, Zuzana Jechumtalova, Sherilyn Coretta Williams-Stroud, Umair Bin Waheed, and Víctor Vilarrasa
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1384, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1384, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Solid Earth (SE).
Short summary
Short summary
We have studied the stress conditions at the Decatur CO2 storage site that would induce the observed microseismicity. Initial estimates suggested that faults required higher pressure to slip than the injection pressure, but refining pressure and friction assumptions led to more realistic scenarios. Our study highlights the importance of accurate stress state measurements and high-quality data to better predict reservoir response to injection and improve the safety and reliability of CO2 storage.
Haris Raza, George Sand França, Eveline Sayão, and Victor Vilarrasa
Solid Earth, 15, 1407–1417, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1407-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-1407-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Hydropower dams associated with a large reservoir, a key renewable, face challenges like reservoir-triggered seismicity (RTS). Here, rock samples show 6.3 %–14.7 % porosity and a maximum permeability of 0.0098 mD. A 136 m reservoir rise causes a 0.61 MPa pore pressure increase. Vertical stress rises by 0.75 MPa, and horizontal stress falls by 0.48 MPa, which leads to fault destabilization, causing RTS. These facts urge the adoption of sustainable energy strategies and future dam development.
Estanislao Pujades, Laura Scheiber, Marc Teixidó, Rotman Criollo, Olha Nikolenko, Victor Vilarrasa, Enric Vázquez-Suñé, and Anna Jurado
Adv. Geosci., 59, 9–15, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-59-9-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-59-9-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper explores the impact of low enthalpy geothermal energy (LEGE) on the behaviour of organic contaminants of emerging concern (CECs). Specifically, we investigate the impact of LEGE on phenazone that is an analgesic drug commonly reported in urban aquifers. CECs pose a risk for the environment and human health, and thus, they must be eliminated to increase the available fresh-water resources in urban areas, where water scarcity is a matter of concern due to the population growth.
Víctor Vilarrasa, Jesus Carrera, Sebastià Olivella, Jonny Rutqvist, and Lyesse Laloui
Solid Earth, 10, 871–892, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-871-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-871-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
To meet the goal of the Paris Agreement to limit temperature increase below 2 ºC, geologic carbon storage (GCS) will be necessary at the gigatonne scale. But to successfully deploy GCS, seismicity induced by CO2 injection should be controlled and maintained below a threshold that does not generate nuisances to the population. We conclude that felt induced seismicity can be minimized provided that a proper site characterization, monitoring and pressure management are performed.
Related subject area
Domain: ESSD – Land | Subject: Geophysics and geodesy
Regional-scale shear-wave velocity profiles for ground response analyses and uncertainty evaluations – the Piedmont region (northwest Italy) database
Seismic survey in an urban area: the activities of the EMERSITO INGV emergency group in Ancona (Italy) following the 2022 Mw 5.5 Costa Marchigiana–Pesarese earthquake
Satellite Altimetry-based Extension of global-scale in situ river discharge Measurements (SAEM)
Advancing geodynamic research in Antarctica: reprocessing GNSS data to infer consistent coordinate time series (GIANT-REGAIN)
Airborne gravimetry with quantum technology: observations from Iceland and Greenland
GravIS: mass anomaly products from satellite gravimetry
cigFacies: a massive-scale benchmark dataset of seismic facies and its application
The Italian Archive of Historical Earthquake Data, ASMI
A high-quality Data Set for seismological studies in the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Türkiye
Synthetic ground motions in heterogeneous geologies from various sources: the HEMEWS-3D database
cigChannel: A massive-scale 3D seismic dataset with labeled paleochannels for advancing deep learning in seismic interpretation
HUST-Grace2024: a new GRACE-only gravity field time series based on more than 20 years of satellite geodesy data and a hybrid processing chain
A new repository of electrical resistivity tomography and ground-penetrating radar data from summer 2022 near Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard
Enriching the GEOFON seismic catalog with automatic energy magnitude estimations
AIUB-GRACE gravity field solutions for G3P: processing strategies and instrument parameterization
GPS displacement dataset for the study of elastic surface mass variations
Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) time series and velocities about a slowly convergent margin processed on high-performance computing (HPC) clusters: products and robustness evaluation
TRIMS LST: a daily 1 km all-weather land surface temperature dataset for China's landmass and surrounding areas (2000–2022)
Comprehensive data set of in situ hydraulic stimulation experiments for geothermal purposes at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory (Sweden)
An earthquake focal mechanism catalog for source and tectonic studies in Mexico from February 1928 to July 2022
The Weisweiler passive seismological network: optimised for state-of-the-art location and imaging methods
A global historical twice-daily (daytime and nighttime) land surface temperature dataset produced by Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer observations from 1981 to 2021
Moho depths beneath the European Alps: a homogeneously processed map and receiver functions database
DL-RMD: a geophysically constrained electromagnetic resistivity model database (RMD) for deep learning (DL) applications
The ULR-repro3 GPS data reanalysis and its estimates of vertical land motion at tide gauges for sea level science
In situ stress database of the greater Ruhr region (Germany) derived from hydrofracturing tests and borehole logs
The European Preinstrumental Earthquake Catalogue EPICA, the 1000–1899 catalogue for the European Seismic Hazard Model 2020
Rescue and quality control of historical geomagnetic measurement at Sheshan observatory, China
A newly integrated ground temperature dataset of permafrost along the China–Russia crude oil pipeline route in Northeast China
In situ observations of the Swiss periglacial environment using GNSS instruments
Permafrost changes in the northwestern Da Xing'anling Mountains, Northeast China, in the past decade
British Antarctic Survey's aerogeophysical data: releasing 25 years of airborne gravity, magnetic, and radar datasets over Antarctica
Cesare Comina, Guido Maria Adinolfi, Carlo Bertok, Andrea Bertea, Vittorio Giraud, and Pierluigi Pieruccini
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2175–2191, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2175-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2175-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Estimates of earthquake ground motion rely on evaluating soil and rock profiles, with shear-wave velocity (Vs) as a key factor. Uncertainty in Vs impacts seismic hazard predictions. Stochastic procedures model this uncertainty but must be calibrated using detailed geological data and Vs databases. This paper provides a new Vs profile database for Piedmont (northwest Italy), integrating geological modelling and geophysical data and supporting similar studies in other regions.
Daniela Famiani, Fabrizio Cara, Giuseppe Di Giulio, Giovanna Cultrera, Francesca Pacor, Sara Lovati, Gaetano Riccio, Maurizio Vassallo, Giulio Brunelli, Antonio Costanzo, Antonella Bobbio, Marta Pischiutta, Rodolfo Puglia, Marco Massa, Rocco Cogliano, Salomon Hailemikael, Alessia Mercuri, Giuliano Milana, Luca Minarelli, Alessandro Di Filippo, Lucia Nardone, Simone Marzorati, Chiara Ladina, Debora Pantaleo, Carlo Calamita, Maria Grazia Ciaccio, Antonio Fodarella, Stefania Pucillo, Giuliana Mele, Carla Bottari, Gaetano De Luca, Luigi Falco, Antonino Memmolo, Giulia Sgattoni, and Gabriele Tarabusi
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2087–2112, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2087-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2087-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes data and preliminary analyses made by the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) emergency task force EMERSITO, devoted to site effects and seismic microzonation studies, following the 9 November 2022 strong earthquake localized in the Adriatic Sea (Italy). Considering the affected area, EMERSITO deployed, from November 2022 to February 2023, a temporary seismic network of 11 stations (net code 6N) which sampled different geological units in the urban area of Ancona.
Peyman Saemian, Omid Elmi, Molly Stroud, Ryan Riggs, Benjamin M. Kitambo, Fabrice Papa, George H. Allen, and Mohammad J. Tourian
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2063–2085, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2063-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2063-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study addresses the need for better river discharge data, crucial for water management, by expanding global gauge networks with satellite data. We used satellite altimetry to estimate river discharge for over 8700 stations worldwide, filling gaps in existing records. Our data set, SAEM, supports a better understanding of water systems, helping to manage water resources more effectively, especially in regions with limited monitoring infrastructure.
Eric Buchta, Mirko Scheinert, Matt A. King, Terry Wilson, Achraf Koulali, Peter J. Clarke, Demián Gómez, Eric Kendrick, Christoph Knöfel, and Peter Busch
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1761–1780, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1761-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1761-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Geodetic GPS measurements in Antarctica have been used to track bedrock displacement, which is vital for understanding geodynamic processes such as plate motion and glacial isostatic adjustment. However, the potential of GPS data has been limited by its partially fragmented availability and unreliable metadata. A new dataset, which spans the period from 1995 to 2021, offers consistently processed coordinate time series for 286 GPS sites and promises to enhance future geodynamic research.
Tim Enzlberger Jensen, Bjørnar Dale, Andreas Stokholm, René Forsberg, Alexandre Bresson, Nassim Zahzam, Alexis Bonnin, and Yannick Bidel
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1667–1684, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1667-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1667-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The availability of data from two airborne gravity campaigns using sensors based on both classical and quantum technology is presented. Data are made available by the European Space Agency as raw, intermediate, and final data products. Here “raw” refers to the sensor output, while “final” refers to the along-track gravity estimates. This makes the data relevant for users interested in applications ranging from data processing and quantum studies to geophysical studies using gravity observations.
Christoph Dahle, Eva Boergens, Ingo Sasgen, Thorben Döhne, Sven Reißland, Henryk Dobslaw, Volker Klemann, Michael Murböck, Rolf König, Robert Dill, Mike Sips, Ulrike Sylla, Andreas Groh, Martin Horwath, and Frank Flechtner
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 611–631, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-611-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-611-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
GRACE and GRACE-FO are unique observing systems to quantify mass changes at the Earth’s surface from space. Time series of these mass changes are of high value for various applications, e.g., in hydrology, glaciology, and oceanography. GravIS (Gravity Information Service) provides easy access to user-friendly, regularly updated mass anomaly products. The portal visualizes and describes these data, aiming to highlight their significance for understanding changes in the climate system.
Hui Gao, Xinming Wu, Xiaoming Sun, Mingcai Hou, Hang Gao, Guangyu Wang, and Hanlin Sheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 595–609, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-595-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-595-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We propose three strategies for field seismic data curation, knowledge-guided synthesization, and generative adversarial network (GAN)-based generation to construct a massive-scale, feature-rich, and high-realism benchmark dataset of seismic facies and evaluate its effectiveness in training a deep-learning model for automatic seismic facies classification.
Andrea Rovida, Mario Locati, Andrea Antonucci, and Romano Camassi
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-467, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-467, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
ASMI, the Italian Archive of Historical Earthquake Data, is a data collection that provides seismological data on more than 6600 earthquakes that occurred in Italy and surrounding between 461 BC and today, based on more than 460 data sources. ASMI distributes in diverse ways and formats earthquake parameters, sets of macroseismic intensity, together with the bibliographical reference of the data source and, if possible the data source itself.
Leonardo Colavitti, Dino Bindi, Gabriele Tarchini, Davide Scafidi, Matteo Picozzi, and Daniele Spallarossa
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-448, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-448, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
This work describes a dataset of 5 years of earthquakes with magnitude range 2.0–5.5 from January 2019 along the East Anatolian Fault, Türkiye. All events were located using the Non-Linear Location algorithm, providing reliable horizontal locations and depths. The distributed product includes Fourier Amplitude Spectra, Peak Ground Acceleration and Peak Ground Velocity; we strongly believe that the creation of high-quality, open-source datasets is crucial for any seismological investigation.
Fanny Lehmann, Filippo Gatti, Michaël Bertin, and Didier Clouteau
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3949–3972, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3949-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3949-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Numerical simulations are a promising approach to characterizing the intensity of ground motion in the presence of geological uncertainties. However, the computational cost of 3D simulations can limit their usability. We present the first database of seismic-induced ground motion generated by an earthquake simulator for a collection of 30 000 heterogeneous geologies. The HEMEWS-3D dataset can be helpful for geophysicists, seismologists, and machine learning scientists, among others.
Guangyu Wang, Xinming Wu, and Wen Zhang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-131, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-131, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Seismic paleochannel interpretation is essential for hydrocarbon exploration and paleoclimate studies but remains labor-intensive. Deep learning (DL) is promising to automate it but hindered by the lack of labeled data. We propose a workflow to simulate various channels and realistic seismic volumes, yielding the largest 3D seismic dataset with diverse channel labels. Its effectiveness is proven by field applications. The dataset, codes and DL models are released to advance further research.
Hao Zhou, Lijun Zheng, Yaozong Li, Xiang Guo, Zebing Zhou, and Zhicai Luo
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3261–3281, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3261-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3261-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The satellite gravimetry mission Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and its follower GRACE-FO play a vital role in monitoring mass transportation on Earth. Based on the latest observation data derived from GRACE and GRACE-FO and an updated data processing chain, a new monthly temporal gravity field series, HUST-Grace2024, was determined.
Francesca Pace, Andrea Vergnano, Alberto Godio, Gerardo Romano, Luigi Capozzoli, Ilaria Baneschi, Marco Doveri, and Alessandro Santilano
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3171–3192, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3171-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3171-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present the geophysical data set acquired close to Ny-Ålesund (Svalbard islands) for the characterization of glacial and hydrological processes and features. The data have been organized in a repository that includes both raw and processed (filtered) data and some representative results of 2D models of the subsurface. This data set can foster multidisciplinary scientific collaborations among many disciplines: hydrology, glaciology, climatology, geology, geomorphology, etc.
Dino Bindi, Riccardo Zaccarelli, Angelo Strollo, Domenico Di Giacomo, Andres Heinloo, Peter Evans, Fabrice Cotton, and Frederik Tilmann
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1733–1745, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1733-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1733-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The size of an earthquake is often described by a single number called the magnitude. Among the possible magnitude scales, the seismic moment (Mw) and the radiated energy (Me) scales are based on physical parameters describing the rupture process. Since these two magnitude scales provide complementary information that can be used for seismic hazard assessment and for seismic risk mitigation, we complement the Mw catalog disseminated by the GEOFON Data Centre with Me values.
Neda Darbeheshti, Martin Lasser, Ulrich Meyer, Daniel Arnold, and Adrian Jäggi
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1589–1599, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1589-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1589-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper discusses strategies to improve the GRACE gravity field monthly solutions computed at the Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern. We updated the input observations and background models, as well as improving processing strategies in terms of instrument data screening and instrument parameterization.
Athina Peidou, Donald F. Argus, Felix W. Landerer, David N. Wiese, and Matthias Ellmer
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1317–1332, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1317-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1317-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study recommends a framework for preparing and processing vertical land displacements derived from GPS positioning for future integration with Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) and GRACE-Follow On (GRACE-FO) measurements. We derive GPS estimates that only reflect surface mass signals and evaluate them against GRACE (and GRACE-FO). We also quantify uncertainty of GPS vertical land displacement estimates using various uncertainty quantification methods.
Lavinia Tunini, Andrea Magrin, Giuliana Rossi, and David Zuliani
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 1083–1106, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1083-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1083-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study presents 20-year time series of more than 350 GNSS stations located in NE Italy and surroundings, together with the outgoing velocities. An overview of the input data, station information, data processing and solution quality is provided. The documented dataset constitutes a crucial and complete source of information about the deformation of an active but slowly converging margin over the last 2 decades, also contributing to the regional seismic hazard assessment of NE Italy.
Wenbin Tang, Ji Zhou, Jin Ma, Ziwei Wang, Lirong Ding, Xiaodong Zhang, and Xu Zhang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 387–419, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-387-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-387-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper reported a daily 1 km all-weather land surface temperature (LST) dataset for Chinese land mass and surrounding areas – TRIMS LST. The results of a comprehensive evaluation show that TRIMS LST has the following special features: the longest time coverage in its class, high image quality, and good accuracy. TRIMS LST has already been released to the scientific community, and a series of its applications have been reported by the literature.
Arno Zang, Peter Niemz, Sebastian von Specht, Günter Zimmermann, Claus Milkereit, Katrin Plenkers, and Gerd Klee
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 295–310, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-295-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-295-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We present experimental data collected in 2015 at Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory. We created six cracks in a rock mass by injecting water into a borehole. The cracks were monitored using special sensors to study how the water affected the rock. The goal of the experiment was to figure out how to create a system for generating heat from the rock that is better than what has been done before. The data collected from this experiment are important for future research into generating energy from rocks.
Quetzalcoatl Rodríguez-Pérez and F. Ramón Zúñiga
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4781–4801, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4781-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4781-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a comprehensive catalog of focal mechanisms for earthquakes in Mexico and neighboring areas spanning February 1928 to July 2022. The catalog comprises a wide range of earthquake magnitudes and depths and includes data from diverse geological environments. We collected and revised focal mechanism data from various sources and methods. The catalog is a valuable resource for future studies on earthquake source mechanisms, tectonics, and seismic hazard in the region.
Claudia Finger, Marco P. Roth, Marco Dietl, Aileen Gotowik, Nina Engels, Rebecca M. Harrington, Brigitte Knapmeyer-Endrun, Klaus Reicherter, Thomas Oswald, Thomas Reinsch, and Erik H. Saenger
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2655–2666, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2655-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2655-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Passive seismic analyses are a key technology for geothermal projects. The Lower Rhine Embayment, at the western border of North Rhine-Westphalia in Germany, is a geologically complex region with high potential for geothermal exploitation. Here, we report on a passive seismic dataset recorded with 48 seismic stations and a total extent of 20 km. We demonstrate that the network design allows for the application of state-of-the-art seismological methods.
Jia-Hao Li, Zhao-Liang Li, Xiangyang Liu, and Si-Bo Duan
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2189–2212, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2189-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2189-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) is the only sensor that has the advantages of frequent revisits (twice per day), relatively high spatial resolution (4 km at the nadir), global coverage, and easy access prior to 2000. This study developed a global historical twice-daily LST product for 1981–2021 based on AVHRR GAC data. The product is suitable for detecting and analyzing climate changes over the past 4 decades.
Konstantinos Michailos, György Hetényi, Matteo Scarponi, Josip Stipčević, Irene Bianchi, Luciana Bonatto, Wojciech Czuba, Massimo Di Bona, Aladino Govoni, Katrin Hannemann, Tomasz Janik, Dániel Kalmár, Rainer Kind, Frederik Link, Francesco Pio Lucente, Stephen Monna, Caterina Montuori, Stefan Mroczek, Anne Paul, Claudia Piromallo, Jaroslava Plomerová, Julia Rewers, Simone Salimbeni, Frederik Tilmann, Piotr Środa, Jérôme Vergne, and the AlpArray-PACASE Working Group
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2117–2138, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2117-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We examine the spatial variability of the crustal thickness beneath the broader European Alpine region by using teleseismic earthquake information (receiver functions) on a large amount of seismic waveform data. We compile a new Moho depth map of the broader European Alps and make our results freely available. We anticipate that our results can potentially provide helpful hints for interdisciplinary imaging and numerical modeling studies.
Muhammad Rizwan Asif, Nikolaj Foged, Thue Bording, Jakob Juul Larsen, and Anders Vest Christiansen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1389–1401, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1389-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1389-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
To apply a deep learning (DL) algorithm to electromagnetic (EM) methods, subsurface resistivity models and/or the corresponding EM responses are often required. To date, there are no standardized EM datasets, which hinders the progress and evolution of DL methods due to data inconsistency. Therefore, we present a large-scale physics-driven model database of geologically plausible and EM-resolvable subsurface models to incorporate consistency and reliability into DL applications for EM methods.
Médéric Gravelle, Guy Wöppelmann, Kevin Gobron, Zuheir Altamimi, Mikaël Guichard, Thomas Herring, and Paul Rebischung
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 497–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-497-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-497-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We produced a reanalysis of GNSS data near tide gauges worldwide within the International GNSS Service. It implements advances in data modelling and corrections, extending the record length by about 7 years. A 28 % reduction in station velocity uncertainties is achieved over the previous solution. These estimates of vertical land motion at the coast supplement data from satellite altimetry or tide gauges for an improved understanding of sea level changes and their impacts along coastal areas.
Michal Kruszewski, Gerd Klee, Thomas Niederhuber, and Oliver Heidbach
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5367–5385, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5367-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5367-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The authors assemble an in situ stress magnitude and orientation database based on 429 hydrofracturing tests that were carried out in six coal mines and two coal bed methane boreholes between 1986 and 1995 within the greater Ruhr region (Germany). Our study summarises the results of the extensive in situ stress test campaign and assigns quality to each data record using the established quality ranking schemes of the World Stress Map project.
Andrea Rovida, Andrea Antonucci, and Mario Locati
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5213–5231, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5213-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5213-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
EPICA is the 1000–1899 catalogue compiled for the European Seismic Hazard Model 2020 and contains 5703 earthquakes with Mw ≥ 4.0. It relies on the data of the European Archive of Historical Earthquake Data (AHEAD), both macroseismic intensities from historical seismological studies and parameters from regional catalogues. For each earthquake, the most representative datasets were selected and processed in order to derive harmonised parameters, both from intensity data and parametric catalogues.
Suqin Zhang, Changhua Fu, Jianjun Wang, Guohao Zhu, Chuanhua Chen, Shaopeng He, Pengkun Guo, and Guoping Chang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5195–5212, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5195-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5195-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Sheshan observatory has nearly 150 years of observation history, and its observation data have important scientific value. However, with time, these precious historical data face the risk of damage and loss. We have carried out a series of rescues on the historical data of the Sheshan observatory. New historical datasets were released, including the quality-controlled absolute hourly mean values of three components (D, H, and Z) from 1933 to 2019.
Guoyu Li, Wei Ma, Fei Wang, Huijun Jin, Alexander Fedorov, Dun Chen, Gang Wu, Yapeng Cao, Yu Zhou, Yanhu Mu, Yuncheng Mao, Jun Zhang, Kai Gao, Xiaoying Jin, Ruixia He, Xinyu Li, and Yan Li
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5093–5110, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5093-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5093-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A permafrost monitoring network was established along the China–Russia crude oil pipeline (CRCOP) route at the eastern flank of the northern Da Xing'anling Mountains in Northeast China. The resulting datasets fill the gaps in the spatial coverage of mid-latitude mountain permafrost databases. Results show that permafrost warming has been extensively observed along the CRCOP route, and local disturbances triggered by the CRCOPs have resulted in significant permafrost thawing.
Alessandro Cicoira, Samuel Weber, Andreas Biri, Ben Buchli, Reynald Delaloye, Reto Da Forno, Isabelle Gärtner-Roer, Stephan Gruber, Tonio Gsell, Andreas Hasler, Roman Lim, Philippe Limpach, Raphael Mayoraz, Matthias Meyer, Jeannette Noetzli, Marcia Phillips, Eric Pointner, Hugo Raetzo, Cristian Scapozza, Tazio Strozzi, Lothar Thiele, Andreas Vieli, Daniel Vonder Mühll, Vanessa Wirz, and Jan Beutel
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5061–5091, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5061-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5061-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper documents a monitoring network of 54 positions, located on different periglacial landforms in the Swiss Alps: rock glaciers, landslides, and steep rock walls. The data serve basic research but also decision-making and mitigation of natural hazards. It is the largest dataset of its kind, comprising over 209 000 daily positions and additional weather data.
Xiaoli Chang, Huijun Jin, Ruixia He, Yanlin Zhang, Xiaoying Li, Xiaoying Jin, and Guoyu Li
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3947–3959, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3947-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3947-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Based on 10-year observations of ground temperatures in seven deep boreholes in Gen’he, Mangui, and Yituli’he, a wide range of mean annual ground temperatures at the depth of 20 m (−2.83 to −0.49 ℃) and that of annual maximum thawing depth (about 1.1 to 7.0 m) have been revealed. This study demonstrates that most trajectories of permafrost changes in Northeast China are ground warming and permafrost degradation, except that the shallow permafrost is cooling in Yituli’he.
Alice C. Frémand, Julien A. Bodart, Tom A. Jordan, Fausto Ferraccioli, Carl Robinson, Hugh F. J. Corr, Helen J. Peat, Robert G. Bingham, and David G. Vaughan
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 3379–3410, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3379-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3379-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This paper presents the release of large swaths of airborne geophysical data (including gravity, magnetics, and radar) acquired between 1994 and 2020 over Antarctica by the British Antarctic Survey. These include a total of 64 datasets from 24 different surveys, amounting to >30 % of coverage over the Antarctic Ice Sheet. This paper discusses how these data were acquired and processed and presents the methods used to standardize and publish the data in an interactive and reproducible manner.
Cited articles
Alghannam, M. and Juanes, R.: Understanding rate effects in
injection-induced earthquakes, Nat. Commun., 11, 3053,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16860-y, 2020.
Atkinson, G. M., Eaton, D. W., and Igonin, N.: Developments in understanding
seismicity triggered by hydraulic fracturing, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1,
264–277, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0049-7, 2020.
Bachmann, C. E., Wiemer, S., Woessner, J., and Hainzl, S.: Statistical
analysis of the induced Basel 2006 earthquake sequence: introducing a
probability-based monitoring approach for Enhanced Geothermal Systems,
Geophys. J. Int., 186, 793–807,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05068.x, 2011.
Bao, X. and Eaton, D. W.: Fault activation by hydraulic fracturing in
Western Canada, Science, 354, 1406–1409, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2583, 2016.
Bär, K., Reinsch, T., and Bott, J.: The PetroPhysical Property Database (P3) – a global compilation of lab-measured rock properties, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2485–2515, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2485-2020, 2020.
Berre, I., Doster, F., and Keilegavlen, E.: Flow in fractured porous media:
A review of conceptual models and discretization approaches, Transp. Porous
Media, 130, 215–236, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-018-1171-6, 2019.
Brace, W. F.: Permeability of crystalline and argillaceous rocks, Int. J.
Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstract, 17, 241–251,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(80)90807-4, 1980.
Buijze, L., van Bijsterveldt, L., Cremer, H., Paap, B., Veldkamp, H.,
Wassing, B. B. T., van Wees, J. D., van Yperen, G. C. N., and ter Heege, J.
H.: Review of induced seismicity in geothermal systems worldwide and
implications for geothermal systems in the Netherlands, Neth. J. Geosci.,
98, e13, https://doi.org/10.1017/njg.2019.6, 2019.
Caine, J. S., Evans, J. P., and Forster, C. B.: Fault zone architecture and
permeability structure, Geology, 24, 1025–1028,
https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<1025:FZAAPS>2.3.CO;2, 1996.
Cappa, F. and Rutqvist, J.: Modeling of coupled deformation and
permeability evolution during fault reactivation induced by deep underground
injection of CO2, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 5, 336–346,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.08.005, 2011.
Caruso, G. D.: The legacy of natural disasters: The intergenerational impact
of 100 years of disasters in Latin America, J. Dev. Econ., 127, 209–233,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2017.03.007, 2017.
Cesca, S., Grigoli, F., Heimann, S., González, A., Buforn, E.,
Maghsoudi, S., Blancg, E., and Dahm, T.: The 2013 September–October seismic
sequence offshore Spain: a case of seismicity triggered by gas injection?,
Geophys. J. Int., 198, 941–953, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu172, 2014.
Cheng, A. H.-D.: Poroelasticity, edited by: Hassanizadeh, S. M., Springer, Berlin,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25202-5, 2016.
De Simone, S., Carrera, J., and Vilarrasa, V.: Superposition approach to
understand triggering mechanisms of post-injection induced seismicity,
Geothermics, 70, 85–97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.05.011,
2017.
Diehl, T., Kraft, T., Kissling, E., and Wiemer, S.: The induced earthquake
sequence related to the St. Gallen deep geothermal project (Switzerland):
Fault reactivation and fluid interactions imaged by microseismicity, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 122, 7272–7290,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014473, 2017.
Ellsworth, W. F.: Injection-induced earthquakes, Science, 341, 1225942,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225942, 2013.
Ellsworth, W. L., Giardini, D., Townend, J., Ge, S., and Shimamoto, T.:
Triggering of the Pohang, Korea, earthquake (Mw 5.5) by enhanced
geothermal system stimulation, Seismol. Res. Lett., 90, 1844–1858,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190102, 2019.
Evans, K. F., Zappone, A., Kraft, T., Deichmann, N., and Moia, F.: A survey
of the induced seismic responses to fluid injection in geothermal and
CO2 reservoirs in Europe, Geothermics, 41, 30–54,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2011.08.002, 2012.
Eyre, T. S., Eaton, D. W., Garagash, D. I., Zecevic, M., Venieri, M., Weir,
R., and Lawton, D. C.: The role of aseismic slip in hydraulic
fracturing–induced seismicity, Sci. Adv., 5, eaav7172,
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aav7172, 2019.
Fan, Z., Eichhubl, P., and Newell, P.: Basement fault reactivation by fluid
injection into sedimentary reservoirs: Poroelastic effects, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 124, 7354–7369, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB017062,
2019.
Flóvenz, Ó. G., Ágústsson, K., Guðnason, E. A., and
KristjÁnsdóttir, S.: Reinjection and induced seismicity in
geothermal fields in Iceland, Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2015, 19–25 April 2015,
Melbourne, Australia, 2015.
Foulger, G. R., Wilson, M. P., Gluyas, J. G., Julian, B. R., and Davies, R.
J.: Global review of human-induced earthquakes, Earth Sci. Rev., 178,
438–514, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.008, 2018.
Gard, M., Hasterok, D., and Halpin, J. A.: Global whole-rock geochemical database compilation, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 1553–1566, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1553-2019, 2019.
Gaucher, E., Schoenball, M., Heidbach, O., Zang, A., Fokker, P. A., van
Wees, J. D., and Kohl, T.: Induced seismicity in geothermal reservoirs: A
review of forecasting approaches, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 52,
1473–1490, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.026, 2015.
Ge, S. and Saar, M. O.: Review: Induced seismicity during geoenergy
development – A hydromechanical perspective, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127,
e2021JB023141, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023141, 2022.
Ghassemi, A. and Zhou, X.: A three-dimensional thermo-poroelastic model for
fracture response to injection/extraction in enhanced geothermal systems,
Geothermics, 40, 39–49,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2010.12.001, 2011.
Glowacka, E. and Nava, F. A.: Major earthquakes in Mexicali Valley, Mexico,
and fluid extraction at Cerro Prieto Geothermal Field, B. Seismol. Soc.
Am., 86, 93–105, https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA08601A0093, 1996.
Goebel, T. H. W., Weingarten, M., Chen, X., Haffener, J., and Brodsky, E.
E.: The 2016 Mw5.1 Fairview, Oklahoma earthquakes: Evidence for long-range
poroelastic triggering at >40 km from fluid disposal wells,
Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 472, 50–61,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.05.011, 2017.
Goertz-Allmann, B. P. and Wiemer, S.: Geomechanical modeling of induced
seismicity source parameters and implications for seismic hazard assessment,
Geophysics, 78, KS25–KS39, https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2012-0102.1, 2013.
Goodfellow, S. D., Nasseri, M. H. B., Maxwell, S. C., and Young, R. P.:
Hydraulic fracture energy budget: Insights from the laboratory, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 42, 3179–3187, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063093, 2015.
Grigoli, F., Cesca, S., Priolo, E., Rinaldi, A. P., Clinton, J. F., Stabile,
T. A., Dost, B., Garcia Fernandez, M., Wiemer, S., and Dahm, T.: Current
challenges in monitoring, discrimination, and management of induced
seismicity related to underground industrial activities: A European
perspective, Rev. Geophys., 55, 310–340,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RG000542, 2017.
Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. F.: Earthquake magnitude intensity, energy,
and acceleration, B. Seism. Soc. Am., 32, 163–191,
https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0320030163, 1942.
Haas, R., Panzer, C., Resch, G., Ragwitz, M., Reece, G., and Held, A.: A
historical review of promotion strategies for electricity from renewable
energy sources in EU countries, Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev., 15,
1003–1034, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.015, 2011.
Haimson, B. C. and Cornet, F. H.: ISRM suggested methods for rock stress
estimation – Part 3: hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of
pre-existing fractures(HTPF), Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 40, 1011–1020,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.08.002, 2003.
Häring, M. O., Schanz, U., Ladner, F., and Dyer, B. C.: Characterisation
of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system, Geothermics, 37, 469–495,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2008.06.002, 2008.
Heidbach, O., Rajabi, M., Cui, X., Fuchs, K., Müller, B., Reinecker, J.,
Reiter, K., Tingay, M., Wenzel, F., Xie, F., Ziegler, M. O., Zoback, M.-L.,
and Zoback, M.: The world stress map database release 2016: Crustal stress
pattern across scales, Tectonophysics, 744, 484–449,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2018.07.007, 2018.
Heinemann, N., Alcalde, J., Miocic, J. M., Hangx, S. J., Kallmeyer, J.,
Ostertag-Henning, C., Hassanpouryouzband, A., Thaysen, E. M., Strobel, G.
J., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., and Edlmann, K.: Enabling large-scale hydrogen
storage in porous media–the scientific challenges, Energy Environ. Sci.,
14, 853-864, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee03536j, 2021.
Hincks, T., Aspinall, W., Cooke, R., and Gernon, T.: Oklahoma's induced
seismicity strongly linked to wastewater injection depth, Science, 359,
1251–1255, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap7911, 2018.
Horton, S.: Disposal of hydrofracking waste fluid by injection into
subsurface aquifers triggers earthquake swarm in central Arkansas with
potential for damaging earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 83, 250–260,
https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.83.2.250, 2012.
IPCC: Special report on Global warming of 1.5 ∘C, Incheon, 93–175,
South Korea, IPCC, 2018.
Jaeger, J. C., Cook, N. G., and Zimmerman, R.: Fundamentals of rock
mechanics, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-1-444-30891-4, 2009.
Johann, L., Dinske, C., and Shapiro, S. A.: Scaling of seismicity induced by
nonlinear fluid-rock interaction after an injection stop, J. Geophys. Res.,
121, 8154–8174, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012949, 2016.
Kanamori, H. and Brodsky, E.: The physics of earthquakes, Rep. Prog. Phys.,
67, 1429–1496, https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/67/8/R03, 2004.
Keranen, K. M. and Weingarten, M.: Induced seismicity. Annu. Rev. Earth
Planet. Sc., 46, 149–174,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-082517-010054, 2018.
Kivi, I. R., Boyet, A., Wu, H., Walter, L., Hanson-Hedgecock, S., Parisio,
F., and Vilarrasa, V.: Global physics-based database of
injection-induced seismicity, CSIC [data set], https://doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/14813,
2022a.
Kivi, I. R., Pujades, E., Rutqvist, J., and Vilarrasa, V.: Cooling-induced
reactivation of distant faults during long-term geothermal energy production
in hot sedimentary aquifers, Sci. Rep., 12, 2065,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-06067-0, 2022b.
Küperkoch, L., Olbert, K., and Meier, T.: Long-term monitoring of
induced seismicity at the Insheim geothermal site, Germany, B. Seismol.
Soc. Am., 108, 3668–3683, https://doi.org/10.1785/0120170365, 2018.
Langenbruch, C. and Zoback, M. D.: How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma
respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?, Sci. Adv., 2, e1601542,
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601542, 2016.
Lee, K.-K., Ellsworth, W. L., Giardini, D., Townend, J., Ge, S., Shimamoto,
T., Yeo, I.-W., Kang, T.-S., Rhie, J., and Sheen, D.-H.: Managing
injection-induced seismic risks, Science, 364, 730–732,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax1878, 2019.
Lei, X., Wang, Z., and Su, J.: The December 2018 ML 5.7 and January 2019 ML
5.3 earthquakes in South Sichuan Basin induced by shale gas hydraulic
fracturing, Seismol. Res. Lett., 90, 1099–1110,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0220190029, 2019.
Li, Z., Elsworth, D., and Wang, C.: Constraining maximum event magnitude
during injection-triggered seismicity, Nat. Commun., 12, 1528,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20700-4, 2021.
Luu, K., Schoenball, M., Oldenburg, C. O., and Rutqvist, J.: Coupled
hydromechanical modeling of induced seismicity from CO2 injection in
the Illinois Basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 127, e2021JB023496,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023496, 2022.
McGarr, A.: Maximum magnitude earthquakes induced by fluid injection, J.
Geophys. Res., 119, 1008–1019, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jb010597, 2014.
McGarr, A., Simpson, D., and Seeber, L.: Case histories of induced and
triggered seismicity, in: International handbook of earthquake and engineering
seismology, edited by: Lee, W., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P., and
Kisslinger, C., Elsevier, Chap. 40, v81A, 647–661, 2002.
Megies, T. and Wassermann, J.: Microseismicity observed at a
non-pressure-stimulated geothermal power plant, Geothermics, 52, 36–49,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.01.002, 2014.
National Research Council: Induced seismicity potential in energy
technologies, Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, D.C., 225 pp., 2013.
Neuzil, C. E.: Permeability of clays and shales, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet.
Sci., 47, 247–273, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060437,
2019.
Ogata, Y.: Statistical-models for earthquake occurrences and residual
analysis for point-processes, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 83, 9–27,
https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478560 (1988).
Pan, L. and Oldenburg, C. M.: T2Well – an integrated wellbore-reservoir
simulator, Comput. Geosci., 65, 46–55,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2013.06.005, 2014.
Parisio, F., Vilarrasa, V., Wang, W., Kolditz, O., and Nagel, T.: The risks
of long-term re-injection in supercritical geothermal systems, Nat. Commun.,
10, 4391, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12146-0, 2019.
Rice, J. R. and Cleary, M. P.: Some basic stress diffusion solutions for
fluid-saturated elastic porous media with compressible constituents, Rev.
Geophys., 14, 227–241, https://doi.org/10.1029/RG014i002p00227, 1976.
Rinaldi, A. P., Jeanne, P., Rutqvist, J., Cappa, F., and Guglielmi, Y.: Effects
of fault-zone architecture on earthquake magnitude and gas leakage related
to CO2 injection in a multi-layered sedimentary system, Greenhouse
Gases Sci. Technol., 4, 99–120, https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1403, 2014.
Ringrose, P. S., Furre, A.-K., Gilfillan, S. M. V., Krevor, S., Landrø,
M., Leslie, R., Meckel, T., Nazarian, B., and Zahid, A.: Storage of carbon
dioxide in saline aquifers: physicochemical processes, key constraints, and
scale-up potential, Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng., 12, 471–494,
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-093020-091447, 2021.
Roth, M. P., Verdecchia, A., Harrington, R. M., and Liu, Y.: High-resolution
imaging of hydraulic-fracturing-induced earthquake clusters in the
Dawson-Septimus area, Northeast British Columbia, Canada, Seismol. Res.
Lett., 91, 2744–2756, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200086, 2020.
Ruiz-Barajas, S., Sharma, N., Convertito, V., Zollo, A., and Benito, B.:
Temporal evolution of a seismic sequence induced by a gas injection in the
Eastern coast of Spain, Sci. Rep., 7, 1–15,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02773-2, 2017.
Scibek, J.: Multidisciplinary database of permeability of fault zones and
surrounding protolith rocks at world-wide sites, Sci. Data, 7, 95,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0435-5, 2020.
Segall, P. and Lu, S.: Injection-induced seismicity: Poroelastic and
earthquake nucleation effects, J. Geophys. Res., 120, 5082–5103,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012060, 2015.
Shapiro, S. A., Huenges, E., and Borm, G.: Estimating the crust permeability
from fluid-injection-induced seismic emission at the KTB site, Geophys. J.
Int., 131, F15–F18, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1997.tb01215.x,
1997.
Shapiro, S. A., Krüger, O. S., Dinske, C., and Langenbruch, C.:
Magnitudes of induced earthquakes and geometric scales of fluid-stimulated
rock volumes, Geophysics, 76, WC55–WC63,
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2010-0349.1, 2011.
Shapiro, S. A., Kim, K. H., and Ree, J. H.: Magnitude and nucleation time of
the 2017 Pohang Earthquake point to its predictable artificial triggering,
Nat. Commun., 12, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26679-w, 2021.
Shen, L. W., Schmitt, D. R., and Haug, K.: Quantitative constraints to the
complete state of stress from the combined borehole and focal mechanism
inversions: Fox Creek, Alberta, Tectonophysics, 764, 110–123,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2019.04.023, 2019.
Shi, Y. and Bolt, B. A.: The standard error of the magnitude-frequency b
value, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 72, 1677–1687,
https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0720051677, 1982.
Shirzaei, M., Ellsworth, W. L., Tiampo, K. F., González, P. J., and
Manga, M.: Surface uplift and time-dependent seismic hazard due to fluid
injection in eastern Texas, Science, 353, 1416–1419,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag0262, 2016.
Skoumal, R. J., Brudzinski, M. R., and Currie, B. S.: Proximity of
Precambrian basement affects the likelihood of induced seismicity in the
Appalachian, Illinois, and Williston Basins, central and eastern United
States, Geosphere, 14, 1365–1379, https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01542.1,
2018a.
Skoumal, R. J., Ries, R., Brudzinski, M. R., Barbour, A. J., and Currie, B.
S.: Earthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing are pervasive in Oklahoma,
J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 123, 10918–10935,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016790, 2018b.
Suckale, J.: Induced seismicity in hydrocarbon fields, Adv. Geophys., 51,
55–106, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2687(09)05107-3, 2009.
Talwani, P., Chen, L., and Gahalaut, K.: Seismogenic permeability, ks, J.
Geophys. Res., 112, B07309, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JB004665, 2007.
The Human-Induced Earthquake Database (HiQuake):
https://inducedearthquakes.org/, last access: 3 June 2022.
Townend, J. and Zoback, M. D.: How faulting keeps the crust strong,
Geology, 28, 399–402, https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<399:HFKTCS>2.0.CO;2, 2000.
Utsu, T.: A statistical study on the occurrence of aftershocks, Geophys.
Mag., 30, 521–605, 1961.
Vafaie, A. and Rahimzadeh Kivi, I.: An investigation on the effect of
thermal maturity and rock composition on the mechanical behavior of
carbonaceous shale formations, Mar. Pet. Geol., 116, 104315,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104315, 2020.
Valley, B. and Evans, K. F.: Stress magnitudes in the Basel enhanced
geothermal system, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 118, 1–20,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.03.008, 2019.
van der Elst, N. J., Page, M. T., Weiser, D. A., Goebel, T. H. W., and
Hosseini, S. M.: Induced earthquake magnitudes are as large as
(statistically) expected, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 4575–4590,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB012818, 2016.
Verberne, B. A., van den Ende, M. P. A., Chen, J., Niemeijer, A. R., and Spiers, C. J.: The physics of fault friction: insights from experiments on simulated gouges at low shearing velocities, Solid Earth, 11, 2075–2095, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-2075-2020, 2020.
Verdon, J. P.: Significance for secure CO2 storage of earthquakes
induced by fluid injection, Environ. Res. Lett., 9, 064022,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/6/064022, 2014.
Verdon, J. P. and Bommer, J.: Green, yellow, red, or out of the blue? An
assessment of traffic light schemes to mitigate the impact of hydraulic
fracturing-induced seismicity, J. Seismolog., 24, 301–326,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-020-09966-9, 2021.
Vilarrasa, V.: The role of the stress regime on microseismicity induced by
overpressure and cooling in geologic carbon storage, Geofluids, 16,
941–953, https://doi.org/10.1111/gfl.12197, 2016.
Vilarrasa, V. and Carrera, J.: Geologic carbon storage is unlikely to
trigger large earthquakes and reactivate faults through which CO2 could
leak, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 5938–5943,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1413284112, 2015.
Vilarrasa, V. and Rutqvist, J.: Thermal effects on geologic carbon storage,
Earth-Sci. Rev., 165, 245–256,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.12.011, 2017.
Vilarrasa, V., Carrera, J., and Olivella, S.: Hydromechanical
characterization of CO2 injection sites, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas
Control, 19, 665–677, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.11.014, 2013.
Vilarrasa, V., Makhnenko, R., and Gheibi, S.: Geomechanical analysis of the
influence of CO2 injection location on fault stability, J. Rock Mech.
Geotech. Eng., 8, 805–818, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.06.006,
2016.
Vilarrasa, V., Carrera, J., Olivella, S., Rutqvist, J., and Laloui, L.: Induced seismicity in geologic carbon storage, Solid Earth, 10, 871–892, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-10-871-2019, 2019.
Vilarrasa, V., De Simone, S., Carrera, J., and Villaseñor, A.:
Unraveling the causes of the seismicity induced by underground gas storage
at Castor, Spain, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092038,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092038, 2021.
Wang, J., Li, T., Gu, Y. J., Schultz, R., Yusifbayov, J., and Zhang, M.:
Sequential fault reactivation and secondary triggering in the March 2019 Red
Deer induced earthquake swarm, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090219,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090219, 2020.
Weingarten, M. B., Ge, S., Godt, J. W., Bekins, B. A., and Rubinstein, J.
L.: High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S.
mid-continent seismicity, Science, 348, 1336–1340,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1345, 2015.
Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I., Appleton, G., Axton,M., Baak,
A., Blomber, N., Boiten, J.-W., da silca Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E.,
Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O.,
Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Gray, A. J.
G., Groth, P., Goble, C., Grethe, J. S., Heringa, J., Hoen, P. A. C., Hooft,
R., Kuhn, T., Kok, R., Kok, J., Lusher, S. J., Martone, M. E., Mons, A.,
Packer, A. L., Persson, B., Rocca-Serra, P., Roos, M., van Schaik, R.,
Sansone, S.-A., Schultes, E., Sengstag, T., Slater, T., Strawn, G., Swertz,
M. A., Thompson, M., van der Lei, J., van Mulligen, E., Velterop, J.,
Waagmeester, A., Wittenburg, P., Wolstencroft, K., Zhao, J., and Mons, B.:
The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship,
Sci Data, 3, 160018, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18, 2016.
Williams-Stroud, S., Bauer, R., Leetaru, H., Oye, V., Stanek, F., Greenberg,
S., and Langet, N.: Analysis of microseismicity and reactivated fault Size
to assess the potential for felt events by CO2 injection in the
Illinois Basin, B. Seismol. Soc. Am., 110, 2188–2204,
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120200112, 2020.
Wilson, M. P., Foulger, G. R., Gluyas, J. G., Davies, R. J., and Julian, B.
R.: HiQuake: The human-induced earthquake database, Seismol. Res. Lett.,
88, 1560–1565, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170112, 2017.
Wu, H., Vilarrasa, V., De Simone, S., Saaltink, M., and Parisio, F.:
Analytical solution to assess the induced seismicity potential of faults in
pressurized and depleted reservoirs, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 126,
e2020JB020436, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020436, 2021.
Yeck, W., Hayes, G., McNamara, D., Rubinstein, J., Barnhart, W., Earle, P.,
and Benz, H.: Oklahoma experiences largest earthquake during ongoing
regional wastewater injection hazard mitigation efforts, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 44, 711–717, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071685, 2017.
Zang, A., Oye, V., Jousset, P., Deichmann, N., Gritto, R., McGarr, A.,
Majer, E., and Bruhn, D.: Analysis of induced seismicity in geothermal
reservoirs – An overview, Geothermics, 52, 6–21,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.06.005, 2014.
Zareidarmiyan, A., Salarirad, H., Vilarrasa, V., Kim, K.-I., Lee, J., and
Min, K.-B.: Comparison of numerical codes for coupled
thermo-hydro-mechanical simulations of fractured media, J. Rock Mech.
Geotech. Eng., 12, 850–865, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.12.016,
2020.
Zhai, G., Shirzaei, M., and Manga, M.: Widespread deep seismicity in the
Delaware Basin, Texas, is mainly driven by shallow wastewater injection,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2102338118,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102338118, 2021.
Zoback, M. D. and Gorelick, S. M.: Earthquake triggering and large-scale
geologic storage of carbon dioxide, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109,
10164–10168, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202473109, 2012.
Zoback, M. D., Barton, C. A., Brudy, M., Castillo, D. A., Finkbeiner, T.,
Grollimund, B. R., Moos, D. B., Peska, P., Ward, C. D., and Wiprut, D. J.:
Determination of stress orientation and magnitude in deep wells, Int. J.
Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 40, 1049–1076,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.07.001, 2003.
Short summary
Induced seismicity has posed significant challenges to secure deployment of geo-energy projects. Through a review of published documents, we present a worldwide, multi-physical database of injection-induced seismicity. The database contains information about in situ rock, tectonic and geologic characteristics, operational parameters, and seismicity for various subsurface energy-related activities. The data allow for an improved understanding and management of injection-induced seismicity.
Induced seismicity has posed significant challenges to secure deployment of geo-energy projects....
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint