Articles | Volume 18, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-8037-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-8037-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description article
| Highlight paper
| 
11 Nov 2026
Data description article | Highlight paper |
| 11 Nov 2026
| 11 Nov 2026
State of Wildfires 2025–2026
Chantelle A. Burton
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Met Office Hadley Centre, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Francesca Di Giuseppe
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecast, Shinfield Park, Reading RG29AX, UK
Matthew W. Jones
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia (UEA), Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
now at: School of Geography, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
Water and Climate Science, UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK
Maria L. F. Barbosa
Water and Climate Science, UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK
Joe McNorton
European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecast, Shinfield Park, Reading RG29AX, UK
Bob Potts
Met Office Hadley Centre, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Carlota Segura-Garcia
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia (UEA), Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
John T. Abatzoglou
School of Engineering, University of California, Merced, 5200 N Lake Rd, Merced, CA 95343, USA
Iulian Alin Rosu
School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment and Climate Change, Kounoupidiana, Chania 73100, Greece
Niels Andela
BeZero Carbon Ltd, 25 Christopher Street, London, EC2A 2BS, UK
Liana O. Anderson
Earth Observation and Geoinformatics Division, National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Astronautas Avenue 1758, São José dos Campos, 12227-010, Brazil
Sally Archibald
School of Animal Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Witwatersrand Johannesburg, Wits Science StadiumWest Campus, 9 Enoch Sontonga Ave, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, 2017, South Africa
Esther Brambleby
School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia (UEA), Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
Emilio Chuvieco
Department of Geology, Geography and Environment, Universidad de Alcalá, Environmental Remote Sensing Research Group, Calle Colegios 2, Alcalá de Henares 28801, Spain
Andrew Ciavarella
Met Office Hadley Centre, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Hamish Clarke
FLARE Wildfire Research, School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Melbourne, Grattan St, Parkville, 3010, Australia
Francisco de la Barrera
Department of Territorial Planning and Urban Systems, Faculty of Environmental Sciences and EULA-Chile Center for Environmental Sciences, Universidad de Concepcion, Concepcion, Chile
Carlos M. Di Bella
Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, University of Buenos Aires, Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (UBA/CONICET), Av. San Martin 4453 (1417), CABA, Argentina
Enza Di Tomaso
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Robert-Schuman-Platz 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany
Kebonye Dintwe
Department of Environmental Science, University of Botswana, Plot 4775 Notwane Rd, Gaborone, Botswana
Department of Geography, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Tim S. Doherty
Fire Science Program, Western Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kings Park, Perth, 6005, Australia
Victoria M. Donovan
West Florida Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 5988 Highway 90, Milton, FL 32583, USA
Jonathan M. Eden
Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience, Coventry University, Wolston Ln, Ryton-on-Dunsmore, Coventry CV8 3LG, UK
Paulo M. Fernandes
Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences and CoLAB ForestWISE, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, Vila Real, 5000-801, Portugal
Lukas Fiedler
Earth and Society Research Hub (ESRAH), University of Hamburg, Bundesstraße 57, 20146 Hamburg, Germany
IMPRS-ESM, Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Louis Giglio
Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Olivia Haas
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE), Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CEA-Orme des Merisiers, Point Courrier 129F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette CEDEX, France
Douglas S. Hamilton
Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Science, North Carolina State University, 2800 Faucette Drive, Raleigh, NC 27603, USA
Stijn Hantson
School of Sciences and Engineering, Universidad del Rosario, Calle 12C No. 6-25, Bogota, Colombia
Sarah Harris
Fire Risk, Research and Community Preparedness, Country Fire Authority, Burwood East, Victoria, Australia
Andrew J. Hartley
Met Office Hadley Centre, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK
Theo Keeping
Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, Weeks Building, 16–18 Prince's Gardens, London SW7 1NE, UK
Crystal A. Kolden
School of Engineering, University of California, Merced, 5200 N Lake Rd, Merced, CA 95343, USA
Jean-Luc Kouassi
UMRI Sciences Agronomiques et Procédés de Transformation, Institut National Polytechnique Félix Houphouët-Boigny, BP 1093 Yamoussoukro, Côte d'Ivoire
Elena Kukavskaya
Laboratory of Experimental and Applied Ecology, V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences – separate subdivision of the FRC KSC SB RAS, 50/28 Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk, 660036, Russian Federation
Seppe Lampe
Water & Climate, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussel, Belgium
Zhongwei Liu
National Centre for Earth Observation, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Space Park Leicester, 92 Corporation Road, Space City, Leicester, LE4 5SP, UK
Guilherme Mataveli
Earth Observation and Geoinformatics Division, National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Astronautas Avenue 1758, São José dos Campos, 12227-010, Brazil
Sarah Meier
Department of Management, Technology and Economics, ETH Zürich, Energy and Climate Economics, Zürichbergstrasse 18, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Duarte Oom
Forests and Climate, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy
Mark Parrington
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Robert-Schuman-Platz 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany
Yuquan Qu
Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1100, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, the Netherlands
Victor Resco de Dios
Department of Forest and Agricultural Science and Engineering, University of Lleida, 25003 Lleida, Spain
Julien Ruffault
Unité de recherche Écologie des Forêts Méditerranéennes (URFM), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), 228 route de l'Aérodrome, Avignon, 84914, France
Mojtaba Sadegh
Civil Engineering, Boise State University, College of Engineering, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID 83725-2060, USA
Cristina Santín
Biodiversity Research Institute (IMIB), CSIC-University of Oviedo-Principality of Asturias, Research Building, Mieres Campus, Mieres, 33600, Spain
Fernando Sedano
Disaster Risk Management Unit (E.1), Directorate E (Space, Security, and Migration), European Commission Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Rue du Champ de Mars 21, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Jacquelyn K. Shuman
Science and Innovation, Environmental Defense Fund, 2060 Broadway, Suite 300, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
Patrícia S. Silva
School of the Environment, Yale University, 195 Prospect St, New Haven, CT 06511, USA
Fiona R. Spuler
ScaDS.AI Leipzig (Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence), University of Leipzig, Humboldtstraße 25, 04105 Leipzig, Germany
Carmen B. Steinmann
Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Universitätstrasse 22, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
Veerachai Tanpipat
Forestry Research Center, Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Upper ASEAN Wildland Fire Special Research Unit (WFSRU), 50 Ngamwongwan Rd, Lat Yao, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Miguel Ángel Torres-Vazquez
Department of Geology, Geography and Environment, Universidad de Alcalá, Environmental Remote Sensing Research Group, Calle Colegios 2, Alcalá de Henares 28801, Spain
Marco Turco
Department of Physics, University of Murcia, Regional Atmospheric Modelling (MAR) Group, Regional Campus of International Excellence Campus Mare Nostrum (CEIR), C. Campus Universitario, 11, 30100 Murcia, Spain
Guido R. van der Werf
Meteorology and Air Quality, Wageningen University and Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 3-3 A, 6708 PB, Wageningen, the Netherlands
Dave van Wees
BeZero Carbon Ltd, 25 Christopher Street, London, EC2A 2BS, UK
Sander Veraverbeke
Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1100, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, the Netherlands
Jakob B. Wessel
Institute for Meteorology, University of Leipzig, Stephanstraße 3, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
Tsinghua Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, University Town of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518055, China
Related authors
Inika Taylor, Douglas I. Kelley, Camilla Mathison, Karina E. Bett-Williams, Andrew J. Hartley, Richard A. Betts, Chantelle Burton, and Maria L. F. Barbosa
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4257–4289, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4257-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4257-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We present future climate change projections that show increasing fire danger worldwide. Focusing on Australia, Brazil, and the USA, we show that limiting warming to 2 °C reduces the increase in fire danger. However, fire seasons still lengthen and intensify even at 1.5 °C, demonstrating the need for mitigation to limit impacts and adaptation to manage residual risk. Low-fire danger periods persist, but we show their timing and duration will shift and must be considered in fire management.
João C. M. Teixeira, Chantelle Burton, Douglas I. Kelley, Gerd A. Folberth, Fiona M. O'Connor, Richard A. Betts, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 739–767, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-739-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-739-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Burned area has declined globally since the late 1990s, especially in tropical savannas, yet many climate models miss this trend because they poorly represent human fire use and suppression. We tested whether adding a simple link to human development improves a fire model. This reduced large regional errors and better captured downward trends in several areas, though it increased global underestimation and reduced variability. Human influence is key, but simple assumptions have trade-offs.
Katja Frieler, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, Simon Treu, Christian Otto, Jan Volkholz, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Stefanie Heinicke, Colin Jones, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Ryan Heneghan, Derek P. Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Dánnell Quesada-Chacón, Kerry Emanuel, Chia-Ying Lee, Suzana J. Camargo, Linn Hamester, Jonas Jägermeyr, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Lisa Novak, Inga J. Sauer, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala, Matthew Forrest, Michel Bechtold, Robert Reinecke, Inge de Graaf, Jed O. Kaplan, Alexander Koch, Matthieu Lengaigne, Rohini Kumar, and Maryna Strokal
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 4095–4135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-4095-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-4095-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the experiments and data sets necessary to run historic and future impact projections, and the underlying assumptions of future climate change as defined by the 3rd round of the ISIMIP Project (Inter-sectoral Impactmodel Intercomparison Project, isimip.org). ISIMIP provides a framework for cross-sectorally consistent climate impact simulations to contribute to a comprehensive and consistent picture of the world under different climate-change scenarios.
Fang Li, David M. Lawrence, Brendan M. Rogers, Chantelle Burton, Huilin Huang, Yiquan Jiang, Johannes W. Kaiser, Matthew Kasoar, Hanna Lee, Ruby Leung, Lars Nieradzik, Aihui Wang, Daniel S. Ward, Ligeer Ce, Yangchun Li, Zhongda Lin, Apostolos Voulgarakis, and Yongkang Xue
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 3989–4007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3989-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3989-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme fire events are increasing, and fires are projected to rise across most regions, posing growing risks to ecosystems and society. As a key Earth system process, fire is now modeled in most Earth System Models (ESMs). FireMIP (Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project) within CMIP7 will evaluate fire simulations in state‑of‑the‑art ESMs, project future fire changes, and provide quantitative, process‑based understanding of fire's role in the Earth system.
Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle Burton, Francesca Di Giuseppe, Matthew W. Jones, Maria L. F. Barbosa, Esther Brambleby, Joe R. McNorton, Zhongwei Liu, Anna S. I. Bradley, Katie Blackford, Eleanor Burke, Andrew Ciavarella, Enza Di Tomaso, Jonathan Eden, Igor José M. Ferreira, Lukas Fiedler, Andrew J. Hartley, Theodore R. Keeping, Seppe Lampe, Anna Lombardi, Guilherme Mataveli, Yuquan Qu, Patrícia S. Silva, Fiona R. Spuler, Carmen B. Steinmann, Miguel Ángel Torres-Vázquez, Renata Veiga, Dave van Wees, Jakob B. Wessel, Emily Wright, Bibiana Bilbao, Mathieu Bourbonnais, Cong Gao, Carlos M. Di Bella, Kebonye Dintwe, Victoria M. Donovan, Sarah Harris, Elena A. Kukavskaya, Aya Brigitte N'Dri, Cristina Santín, Galia Selaya, Johan Sjöström, John T. Abatzoglou, Niels Andela, Rachel Carmenta, Emilio Chuvieco, Louis Giglio, Douglas S. Hamilton, Stijn Hantson, Sarah Meier, Mark Parrington, Mojtaba Sadegh, Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz, Fernando Sedano, Marco Turco, Guido R. van der Werf, Sander Veraverbeke, Liana O. Anderson, Hamish Clarke, Paulo M. Fernandes, and Crystal A. Kolden
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 5377–5488, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5377-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5377-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The second State of Wildfires report examines extreme wildfire events from 2024 to early 2025. It analyses key regional events in Southern California, Northeast Amazonia, Pantanal–Chiquitano, and the Congo Basin, assessing their drivers and predictability and attributing them to climate change and land use. Seasonal outlooks and decadal projections are provided. Climate change greatly increased the likelihood of these fires, and without strong mitigation, such events will become more frequent.
Renata Moura da Veiga, Celso von Randow, Chantelle Burton, Douglas I. Kelley, Manoel Cardoso, and Fabiano Morelli
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3581–3601, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3581-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3581-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We systematically reviewed 77 papers to understand the Cerrado’s fire emissions within the global carbon budget by evaluating how fire parameters can inform emission estimates and mitigation strategies. Estimating fire emissions in the Cerrado requires a holistic approach, combining fire carbon emission estimates, fire dynamic parameters, and fire management and policy. We highlight key research gaps that could provide more comprehensive insights into accounting for fire emissions in the Cerrado.
Anastasios Rovithakis, Eleanor Burke, Chantelle Burton, Matthew Kasoar, Manolis G. Grillakis, Konstantinos D. Seiradakis, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3185–3200, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3185-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3185-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We used a land surface computer model to forecast how climate change will impact wildfires in Greece. Our results show a significant increase in future burnt area due to hotter, drier climate. Allowing vegetation to change with the climate lessens this increase overall, since fire is no longer igniting in areas already burnt, and it even led to projected decreases in the agricultural areas in the north of the country.
Maria Lucia Ferreira Barbosa, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle A. Burton, Igor J. M. Ferreira, Renata Moura da Veiga, Anna Bradley, Paulo Guilherme Molin, and Liana O. Anderson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3533–3557, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3533-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3533-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
As fire seasons in Brazil become increasingly severe, confidently understanding the factors driving fires is more critical than ever. To address this challenge, we developed FLAME (Fire Landscape Analysis using Maximum Entropy), a new model designed to predict fires and to analyse the spatial influence of both environmental and human factors while accounting for uncertainties. By adapting the model to different regions, we can enhance fire management strategies, making FLAME a powerful tool for protecting landscapes in Brazil and beyond.
Matthew W. Jones, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle A. Burton, Francesca Di Giuseppe, Maria Lucia F. Barbosa, Esther Brambleby, Andrew J. Hartley, Anna Lombardi, Guilherme Mataveli, Joe R. McNorton, Fiona R. Spuler, Jakob B. Wessel, John T. Abatzoglou, Liana O. Anderson, Niels Andela, Sally Archibald, Dolors Armenteras, Eleanor Burke, Rachel Carmenta, Emilio Chuvieco, Hamish Clarke, Stefan H. Doerr, Paulo M. Fernandes, Louis Giglio, Douglas S. Hamilton, Stijn Hantson, Sarah Harris, Piyush Jain, Crystal A. Kolden, Tiina Kurvits, Seppe Lampe, Sarah Meier, Stacey New, Mark Parrington, Morgane M. G. Perron, Yuquan Qu, Natasha S. Ribeiro, Bambang H. Saharjo, Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz, Jacquelyn K. Shuman, Veerachai Tanpipat, Guido R. van der Werf, Sander Veraverbeke, and Gavriil Xanthopoulos
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3601–3685, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This inaugural State of Wildfires report catalogues extreme fires of the 2023–2024 fire season. For key events, we analyse their predictability and drivers and attribute them to climate change and land use. We provide a seasonal outlook and decadal projections. Key anomalies occurred in Canada, Greece, and western Amazonia, with other high-impact events catalogued worldwide. Climate change significantly increased the likelihood of extreme fires, and mitigation is required to lessen future risk.
Katie R. Blackford, Matthew Kasoar, Chantelle Burton, Eleanor Burke, Iain Colin Prentice, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3063–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Peatlands are globally important stores of carbon which are being increasingly threatened by wildfires with knock-on effects on the climate system. Here we introduce a novel peat fire parameterization in the northern high latitudes to the INFERNO global fire model. Representing peat fires increases annual burnt area across the high latitudes, alongside improvements in how we capture year-to-year variation in burning and emissions.
Katja Frieler, Jan Volkholz, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, María del Rocío Rivas López, Christian Otto, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Johanna T. Malle, Simon Treu, Christoph Menz, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Yannick Rousseau, Reg A. Watson, Charles Stock, Xiao Liu, Ryan Heneghan, Derek Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Tingting Wang, Fubao Sun, Inga J. Sauer, Johannes Koch, Inne Vanderkelen, Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Jida Wang, Fangfang Yao, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, and Michel Bechtold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper provides an overview of all observational climate-related and socioeconomic forcing data used as input for the impact model evaluation and impact attribution experiments within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. The experiments are designed to test our understanding of observed changes in natural and human systems and to quantify to what degree these changes have already been induced by climate change.
Joao Carlos Martins Teixeira, Chantelle Burton, Douglas I. Kelly, Gerd A. Folberth, Fiona M. O'Connor, Richard A. Betts, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2023-136, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2023-136, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Representing socio-economic impacts on fires is crucial to underpin the confidence in global fire models. Introducing these into INFERNO, reduces biases and improves the modelled burnt area (BA) trends when compared to observations. Including socio-economic factors in the representation of fires in Earth System Models is important for realistically simulating BA, quantifying trends in the recent past, and for understanding the main drivers of those at regional scales.
Camilla Mathison, Eleanor Burke, Andrew J. Hartley, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle Burton, Eddy Robertson, Nicola Gedney, Karina Williams, Andy Wiltshire, Richard J. Ellis, Alistair A. Sellar, and Chris D. Jones
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4249–4264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4249-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4249-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes and evaluates a new modelling methodology to quantify the impacts of climate change on water, biomes and the carbon cycle. We have created a new configuration and set-up for the JULES-ES land surface model, driven by bias-corrected historical and future climate model output provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impacts Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP). This allows us to compare projections of the impacts of climate change across multiple impact models and multiple sectors.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Robbie M. Andrew, Judith Hauck, Matthew W. Jones, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Kjetil Aas, Simone R. Alin, Vivek Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Kimberly Bedard, David Martin Belda, Nicolas Bellouin, Alice Benoit-Cattin, Carla F. Berghoff, Sarah Berthet, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Eleanor Burke, Leon Casse, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Susan E. Curless, Tim DeVries, Tobias Ehmen, Matthew P. Enright, Kazutaka Enyo, Michael Erb, Wiley Evans, Amanda R. Fay, Ben Felzer, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Filippa Fransner, Agneta Fransson, Andrew Friedman, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Wensu Hao, Kirsty Harrington, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Tatiana Ilyina, Akihiko Ito, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Rajesh Janardanan, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Linus Kamb, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Taro Kunimitsu, Xin Lan, Vladimir Lapin, Siv K. Lauvset, Simone Le Chevère, Woo-Sung Lee, Enhui Liao, Junjie Liu, Zhu Liu, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Lei Ma, Suman Maity, Gregg Marland, Patrick C. McGuire, Nicolas Metzl, Juliette Mignot, Natalie M. Monacci, Eric J. Morgan, Jens D. Müller, David R. Munro, Miaki Muramatsu, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Craig Neill, Tobias Nützel, Léa Olivier, Timothy Osborn, Xosé A. Padín, Paul I. Palmer, Sudhanshu Pandey, Denis Pierrot, Ben Poulter, Zhangcai Qin, Yumou Qiu, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Christian Rödenbeck, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Simone Rossi, Jörg Schwinger, Gereon Seeberg, Roland Séférian, Elisabeth H. Shadwick, Ingunn Skjelvan, Karolina Slominska-Durdasiak, T. Luke Smallman, Mohanan G Sreeush, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Jens Terhaar, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Takahiro Toyoda, Joaquin A. Triñanes, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Auke van der Woude, Sebastiaan J. van de Velde, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Jiye Zeng, Ning Zheng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-895, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-895, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2026 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2026). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Rimal Abeed, Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, Grégoire Broquet, Robin Plauchu, Isabelle Pison, Antoine Berchet, Elise Potier, Bo Zheng, Gaëlle Dufour, Adriana Coman, Dilek Savas, Guillaume Siour, Henk Eskes, Beatriz Revilla-Romero, Antony Delavois, and Philippe Ciais
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6638, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6638, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
Nitrogen oxides are harmful air pollutants mainly emitted from fossil fuel burning, and China emits more than any other country. To track them, we combined satellite images with two atmospheric computer models to estimate emissions in China from 2019 to 2021. Emissions fell by 35 % in February 2020, driven by pandemic lockdowns and Lunar New Year holidays, and declined slightly each year. Existing estimates seem 11 % too high, so satellite monitoring can better help guide clean air policies.
Jhonatan Julian Díaz-Timoté, Carlos A. Sierra, Andrés Tangarife-Escobar, Estefanía Muñoz, and Stijn Hantson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6645, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6645, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated how wildfires affect soil carbon age and storage across high-mountain paramo altitudes. By comparing unburned areas with sites burned in 2001 and 2024, we measured long-term fire impacts on carbon dynamics and soil respiration. Our findings reveal that fires alter soil carbon persistence over decades without significantly changing respired carbon signatures. This research improves our understanding of how vulnerable mountain soils respond to fire disturbances.
Alejandro Casallas, Tatiana Medina, Brendan Steffens, Camila Jimenez-Saenz, Franz Antezana-Lopez, Ellie Anne Lopez-Barrera, Carlos Plata, Ricardo Arenas, Léo Dürst, Stijn Hantson, Luis Carlos Belalcazar, and Andrea Pozzer
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5423, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5423, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
Fires in the Amazon rainforest do more than release carbon; they also pollute the air across South America. Using computer simulations and satellite data, we tracked smoke from Amazon fires and found it regularly reaches major cities such as Bogotá, Lima, and São Paulo. We estimate these fires cause about 33 000 early deaths every year across the continent. Countries that have already reduced fires show that pollution and deaths can fall too, meaning better fire management could save many lives.
Prakrut Kansara, Benjamin Zaitchik, Augusto Getirana, Liana O. Anderson, Paul Block, Sujay Kumar, Carlos F. Mena, and William K. Pan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4230, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4230, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
The 2023–24 El Niño caused a historic Amazon drought. To predict such extremes, we built Amazon-LDAS to forecast hydrometeorology at 5-km resolution up to 6 months ahead. Root zone soil moisture forecasts showed high skill at 3-month leads, doubling our wildfire detection capability. However, despite high statistical skill, streamflow forecasts misrepresented underlying hydrologic processes. Applying this to the current El Niño, we forecast drought conditions in northern Amazon for October 2026.
Nora Linscheid, Laura Mayer, Chiara Aquino, Manuela Balzarolo, Maria Vincenza Chiriacò, Mélanie Juillard, Martin Brandt, Emilio Chuvieco, Philippe Ciais, Maoyuan Feng, Rasmus Fensholt, Teja Kattenborn, Amin Khairoun, Katja Kowalski, Siyu Liu, Joachim Maack, Clemens Mosig, Pierre Regnier, Cornelius Senf, Alba Viana-Soto, Yidi Xu, Yanzi Yan, and Ana Bastos
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6189, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-6189, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Earth Observation (EO).
Short summary
Short summary
Despite the recent strong reduction in European forest carbon uptake, a comparison of EU forest carbon losses from different datasets is still lacking. We quantify these carbon sink losses combining new high-resolution Earth Observation estimates of forest disturbance, EO-based bookkeeping models, atmospheric CO2 inversions, and National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (NGHGI). We highlight how EO and NGHGIs can benefit each other in better quantifying C losses in a comprehensive and timely manner.
Tim Butler, Tabish Ansari, Claudio A. Belis, Elisa Bergas-Masso, Willem van Caspel, Hilde Fagerli, Johannes Flemming, Marta Garcia Vivanco, Paul Griffiths, Douglas S. Hamilton, Coralina Hernandez Trujillo, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Vincent Huijnen, Johannes W. Kaiser, Gerbrand Koren, Zbigniew Klimont, Florian Lindl, Aura Lupascu, Mariano Mertens, Martijn Schaap, Steven T. Turnock, Oliver Wild, Philipp Weiss, Jacek Kaminski, Rosa Wu, and Terry Keating
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 10023–10049, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10023-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10023-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Air pollution travels across continents, meaning emissions in one region can affect air quality far away. To better understand this, scientists from many groups are planning to run coordinated computer simulations of the atmosphere. By comparing results across models and emission scenarios, the planned study will show how pollution moves between regions and which sources matter most, helping governments design more effective air quality policies.
Yang Chen, Guido R. van der Werf, Mingquan Mu, Dave van Wees, Joanne V. Hall, Louis Giglio, Roland Vernooij, Douglas C. Morton, Li Xu, Tianjia Liu, Rebecca C. Scholten, Shane R. Coffield, Melanie B. Follette-Cook, Lesley Ott, and James T. Randerson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 7535–7555, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-7535-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-7535-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Fire patterns are changing, partly due to climate change. While the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) is key for tracking fire impacts, the main satellite sensors underpinning this time series are retiring. We introduce GFED5NRT, a new extension using modern VIIRS satellite data to provide daily, real-time updates on fires emissions. By bridging past records with current observations, this system helps scientists and the public monitor extreme fire events and their planetary effects.
Danni Zhang, Bo Zheng, Biqing Zhu, Yidi Xu, Xinrui Liu, Naixian Wang, Longyi Zhang, Jiarui Liang, Guido R. van der Werf, Philippe Ciais, and Thomas Gasser
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5536, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5536, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Here we present OSCAR-fire v1.0, a wildfire carbon dynamics module developed within the OSCAR compact Earth system model. The module extends OSCAR's land carbon bookkeeping framework and describes how a fire event induces instantaneous combustion carbon emissions, legacy dead carbon release, and gradual post-fire ecosystem recovery. This is a process-based and computationally efficient module that can be used for quantifying wildfire contributions to the land carbon budget.
Derrick Muheki, Koen Hufkens, Kim Jacobsen, Hans Verbeeck, Pascal Boeckx, Dominique Kankonde Ntumba, Olivier Kapalay Moulasa, Bas Vercruysse, Julie M. Birkholz, Christophe Verbruggen, Ed Hawkins, Seppe Lampe, Emmanuel Kasongo Yakusu, Fils Makanzu Imwangana, José Mbifo, Théophile Besango Likwela, Félicien Meunier, Olivier Dewitte, Peter Thorne, and Wim Thiery
Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 1455–1511, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1455-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-1455-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The Congo Basin is one of the least studied regions for climate change due to limited accessible data, despite large volumes of historical records stored on paper in archives. In this study, we digitised over 9000 sheets from 37 stations in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, producing more than one million daily weather observations. The results show clear warming since the 1960s, with more hot days and fewer cold days, highlighting the importance of data rescue in data-sparse regions.
Anne-Wil van den Berg, Joram J. D. Hooghiem, Auke M. van der Woude, Pieter Rijsdijk, Roland Vernooij, Santiago Botía, Guido R. van der Werf, John B. Miller, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Maarten C. Krol, and Wouter Peters
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 13929–13958, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13929-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-13929-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We estimate 2019 Brazilian fire carbon monoxide (CO) emissions using CO retrievals from multiple satellites in a new top-down inversion framework. The retrievals strongly constrain fire emissions and complement existing inventories. National-scale posterior emissions align well with the new Global Fire Emissions Database v5.1, supporting progress in fire emission models. Yet, posterior emissions in the Cerrado and Caatinga are systematically higher than inventories; we discuss potential drivers.
Shrutika Wagh, Luana S. Basso, Ayan F. Fleischmann, João Henrique Fernandes Amaral, John Melack, Jost Larvic, David Walter, Stijn Hantson, Julia Marshall, Chris Wilson, Youmi Oh, Lori Bruhwiler, John B. Miller, Corinne Vigouroux, Christian Rödenbeck, and Santiago Botía
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5245, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5245, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We estimated methane emissions from the Amazon, Orinoco, and Paraná river basins using the Jena CarboScope global inversion system. We included Amazon measurements to evaluate their effect on the results. Adding them led to a large adjustment in estimated wetland emissions and strongly influenced the Amazon estimate. Without these measurements, the Amazon estimate increased by about 75 %. Our findings highlight the need to maintain and expand measurements across tropical South America.
Joe McNorton, Edward Comyn-Platt, Francesca Di Giuseppe, Chiara Cagnazzo, and Chris Barnard
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5374, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-5374, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
Sparky-Climate reconstructs and projects global burned area and vegetation fuel conditions from 1950 to 2100. Although global burned area declines in all scenarios, this masks contrasting regional changes. Savanna burning declines while temperate and boreal forests show increasing burned area and more frequent extreme wildfire behaviour, especially under higher emissions. The dataset supports assessment of future carbon stocks, wildfire exposure risk and wildfire emissions.
Li Xu, Qi Tang, Qing Zhu, William J. Riley, Guido R. van der Werf, Yang Chen, Michael J. Prather, and James T. Randerson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4288, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4288, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
Using the E3SM version 3 model with interactive chemistry, this study shows that wildfires substantially perturb global and regional tropospheric chemistry and modify radiative effects through aerosol and ozone interactions, with particularly strong impacts in tropical fire regions. By connecting wildfire emissions with changes in atmospheric composition, radiation, and climate, this study provides important insights on how the atmosphere responds to changing fire activities.
Cinzia Mazzetti, Hannah Cloke, Dai Yamazaki, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Souhail Boussetta, Jasper Denissen, Michel Wortmann, Gabriele Arduini, Gurpreet Dass, Joe McNorton, Anna Agusti-Panareda, Maliko Tanguy, Ervin Zsoter, Margarita Choulga, Emanuel Dutra, Florian Pappenberger, Christoph Rüdiger, and Christel Prudhomme
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4305, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4305, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Rivers are an essential component of the water cycle, yet many Earth system and weather prediction models do not explicitly represent river flow. We integrated a global river model into ECMWF's forecasting system, enabling the simulation of river discharge, water levels, and flooding within a single operational framework. This development lays the foundation for future land–river–atmosphere interactions, paving the way for more complete Earth system models and improved predictions.
Inika Taylor, Douglas I. Kelley, Camilla Mathison, Karina E. Bett-Williams, Andrew J. Hartley, Richard A. Betts, Chantelle Burton, and Maria L. F. Barbosa
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4257–4289, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4257-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4257-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We present future climate change projections that show increasing fire danger worldwide. Focusing on Australia, Brazil, and the USA, we show that limiting warming to 2 °C reduces the increase in fire danger. However, fire seasons still lengthen and intensify even at 1.5 °C, demonstrating the need for mitigation to limit impacts and adaptation to manage residual risk. Low-fire danger periods persist, but we show their timing and duration will shift and must be considered in fire management.
Hui Li, Philippe Ciais, Frédéric Chevallier, Bo Zheng, Paul I. Palmer, Frank Hase, Morgan Lopez, Elsa M. Ordway, Shushi Peng, Danielle Monteverde, Michel Ramonet, Jason M. St. Clair, Le Bienfaiteur Sagang, and Benjamin Poulter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 11893–11908, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11893-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-11893-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how to best place methane monitoring instruments across Africa to better understand where emissions come from. Because observations can overlap in what they detect, adding more sites does not always improve results equally. Using a statistical approach, we identified both the ideal number and locations of sites (ten new sites can reduce emission uncertainty by over 65 % for total African CH4). Our results help guide cost-effective monitoring strategies in regions with limited data.
Natalie Mahowald, Hannah Liddy, Jennifer Marlon, Kostas Tsigaridis, Gisela Winckler, Douglas Hamilton, Jasper Kok, Michael Sigl, Jordan Abell, Adwoa Aboagye-Okyere, Joe Adabouk Amooli, Samuel Albani, Susanne Bauer, Emilie Beaudon, Hunter Brown, Nathan Chellman, Nicolás Cosentino, Nathalie Goodkin, Christopher Guiterman, Stijn Hantson, Chengfei He, Aviva Intveld, Jed Kaplan, Jeremy Klavans, Fabrice Lambert, Haobo Liu, Marie-France Loutre, Joe McConnell, Zachary McGraw, Keren Mezuman, Ron Miller, Nicholas O’Mara, Maria Rosabelle Ong, Gavin Schmidt, Richard Vachula, Lily Wu, and Bingqing Zhang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4532, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4532, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosols are poorly known in past climates, and yet it is very important to understand how aerosols are changing in different climates. In this paper we review available proxy data and modeling approaches to characterize aerosols in past climates. In addition, we propose future studies that can help improve our understanding.
Forrest M. Hoffman, Birgit Hassler, Ranjini Swaminathan, Jared Lewis, Bouwe Andela, Nathan Collier, Dóra Hegedűs, Jiwoo Lee, Charlotte Pascoe, Mika Pflüger, Martina Stockhause, Paul Ullrich, Min Xu, Lisa Bock, Felicity Chun, Bettina K. Gier, Douglas I. Kelley, Axel Lauer, Julien Lenhardt, Manuel Schlund, Mohanan G. Sreeush, Katja Weigel, Ed Blockley, Rebecca Beadling, Romain Beucher, Demiso D. Dugassa, Valerio Lembo, Jianhua Lu, Swen Brands, Jerry Tjiputra, Elizaveta Malinina, Brian Medeiros, Enrico Scoccimarro, Jeremy Walton, Phil Kershaw, André Lanfer Marquez, Malcolm J. Roberts, Eleanor O'Rourke, Beth Dingley, Briony Turner, Helene Hewitt, and John P. Dunne
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 7415–7455, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7415-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-7415-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The Rapid Evaluation Framework (REF) is a community-driven platform for benchmarking and performance assessment of Earth system models. Built upon four disparate community evaluation tools, the REF is designed to provide model-data comparisons for the Assessment Fast Track for the Seventh Phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project. The REF will be run at the Earth System Grid Federation to enable model devleopers and scientists to quickly identify model biases and performance issues.
Noah Liguori-Bills, Catherine E. Scott, Ken S. Carslaw, Natalie Kehrwald, Stijn Hantson, Susan Kaspari, Carlo Barbante, Elena Barbaro, Paolo Gabrielli, Roberta Zangrando, Lonnie G. Thompson, and Douglas S. Hamilton
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2728, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2728, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Ice cores preserve changes in landscape fires and human-caused combustion. In this study, we compared ice core data from every continent, except Oceania, to computer model simulations of fire. We found a large disagreement in the 1850 CE to 1980 CE black carbon ratio. After exploring changes in emissions, transport, and aerosol microphysical processes as potential reasons for this disagreement, our results suggested that fire emission input datasets for climate models are the primary cause.
Matheus de Almeida, Charles M. Shobe, Duna C. Roda-Boluda, Loraine Gourbet, Amber Distelbrink, Sander Veraverbeke, and Benjamin Campforts
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3521, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3521, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Fires play an important control on changing Earth surface processes across a wide range of landscapes. Understanding post-fire sediment dynamics is important to predict the Earth's surface response to fires in landscapes facing environmental changes, as changing fire regimes due to climate variations may have a large impact on soil storage. We develop FireLands, a new landscape evolution model that provides a toolbox to explore the effects of fires on sediment transport over several timescales.
A. Park Williams, John T. Abatzoglou, Gavin D. Madakumbura, Haibo Liu, Stefan Rahimi, and Christopher Daly
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-391, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-391, 2026
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
Here we introduce ParallelClim-WestUS-Daily, a new dataset of daily gridded climate data for the western US from 1951–2025 as well as a parallel, counterfactual realization of the observed climate but without human-caused climate change. This dataset will enable assessments of how climate change has affected complex hydroclimatic processes such as hydrology, vegetation dynamics, and wildfire.
Jessica Stacey, Richard A. Betts, Andrew Hartley, Lina M. Mercado, and Nicola Gedney
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 4225–4243, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4225-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-4225-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Plants typically transpire less with rising atmospheric carbon dioxide, leaving more water in the ground for human use, but many future water scarcity assessments ignore this effect. We use a land surface model to examine how plant responses to carbon dioxide and climate change affect future water scarcity. Our results suggest that including these plant responses increases overall water availability for most people, highlighting the importance of their inclusion in future water scarcity studies.
Rui Li, Haley E. Plaas, Yifan Zhang, Yizhu Chen, Tianyu Zhang, Yi Yang, Sagar Rathod, Guohua Zhang, Xinming Wang, Douglas S. Hamilton, and Mingjin Tang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 9037–9060, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9037-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9037-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This work measured solubility of aerosol Fe from several distinct anthropogenic sources, updated aerosol Fe solubility parameterizations used in the Community Earth System model, and found that residential burning is a significant source of soluble aerosol Fe to the ocean.
João C. M. Teixeira, Chantelle Burton, Douglas I. Kelley, Gerd A. Folberth, Fiona M. O'Connor, Richard A. Betts, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 739–767, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-739-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-739-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Burned area has declined globally since the late 1990s, especially in tropical savannas, yet many climate models miss this trend because they poorly represent human fire use and suppression. We tested whether adding a simple link to human development improves a fire model. This reduced large regional errors and better captured downward trends in several areas, though it increased global underestimation and reduced variability. Human influence is key, but simple assumptions have trade-offs.
Rafaila-Nikola Mourgela, Iulian-Alin Rosu, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3239, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3239, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the global radiative and climate impacts of present-day wildfire emissions. Using EC-Earth3 and CMIP6 emissions, we performed atmosphere-only and ocean-atmosphere coupled simulations to study the local and remote impacts. Our results show a net negative radiative effect dominated by aerosol-cloud interactions. The climate response is mainly driven by the slow ocean-mediated response, producing global cooling and strong regional precipitation changes.
Piers M. Forster, Tristram Walsh, Chris Smith, William F. Lamb, Robin Lamboll, Christophe Cassou, Mathias Hauser, Zeke Hausfather, June-Yi Lee, Matthew D. Palmer, Karina von Schuckmann, Aimée B. A. Slangen, Sophie Szopa, Blair Trewin, Jeongeun Yun, Nathan P. Gillett, Stuart Jenkins, H. Damon Matthews, Krishnan Raghavan, Aurélien Ribes, Joeri Rogelj, Debbie Rosen, Xuebin Zhang, Myles Allen, Robbie M. Andrew, Chris Atkinson, Richard A. Betts, Antonio Bombelli, Samantha N. Burgess, Lijing Cheng, Helen E. Claxton, Pierre Friedlingstein, Thomas L. Frölicher, Catia M. Domingues, Thomas Gasser, Catherine H. Gregory, Rachel M. Hoesly, Daniel Huppmann, Masayoshi Ishii, Christopher Kadow, Alexia Karwat, John Kennedy, Rachel E. Killick, Mahesh V. M. Kovilakam, Paul B. Krummel, Xin Lan, Jean-François Lamarque, Aurélien Liné, Belén Martín-Míguez, Didier P. Monselesan, Colin Morice, Jens Mühle, Pino Mussak, Glen P. Peters, Anna Pirani, Julia Pongratz, Matthew Rigby, Robert Rohde, Abhishek Savita, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Steven J. Smith, Ghassan Taha, Caterina Tassone, Peter Thorne, Christopher Wells, Luke M. Western, Guido R. van der Werf, Susan E. Wijffels, Marco Zecchetto, Junting Zhong, Xiao-Ye Zhang, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, and Panmao Zhai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 3889–3933, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3889-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3889-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We give our annual update of key climate indicators. Our work quantifies the human contribution to global warming and the pace of climate change. This represents a large effort by the international community akin to an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report.
Ni Li, Wim Thiery, Shorouq Zahra, Mariana Madruga de Brito, Koffi Worou, Murathan Kurfalı, Seppe Lampe, Paul Muñoz, Clare Flynn, Camila Trigoso, Joakim Nivre, Jakob Zscheischler, and Gabriele Messori
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2609–2636, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-2609-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-2609-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Climate extremes threaten society and ecosystems, making impact understanding critical. Wikimpacts 1.0 provides an automated pipeline processing Wikipedia texts with underexploited information on climate impacts, yielding comprehensive socio-economic impact data for 2726 climate events from 1034–2024. It offers broader storm-related impacts and finer spatial resolution than established databases, showcasing natural language processing's potential to advance climate impact data.
Mengze Li, Robert B. Jackson, Marielle Saunois, Philippe Ciais, Ben Poulter, Josep G. Canadell, Prabir K. Patra, Hanqin Tian, Zhen Zhang, Etienne Fluet-Chouinard, Zutao Ouyang, Ting Zhang, David J. Beerling, Dmitry A. Belikov, Philippe Bousquet, Danilo Custodio, Naveen Chandra, Xinyu Dou, Nicola Gedney, Peter O. Hopcroft, Alison M. Hoyt, Kazuhito Ichii, Akihito Ito, Atul K. Jain, Katherine Jensen, Fortunat Joos, Thomas Kleinen, Masayuki Kondo, Fa Li, Tingting Li, Xiangyu Liu, Shamil Maksyutov, Avni Malhotra, Adrien Martinez, Kyle McDonald, Joe R. Melton, Jurek Müller, Yosuke Niwa, Shufen Pan, Shushi Peng, Changhui Peng, Zhangcai Qin, Peter Raymond, William Riley, Arjo Segers, Rona L. Thompson, Aki Tsuruta, Yi Xi, Kunxiaojia Yuan, Wenxin Zhang, Bo Zheng, Qing Zhu, Qiuan Zhu, and Qianlai Zhuang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 3507–3524, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3507-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3507-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We proposed a framework that combines machine-learning and climate data to predict global natural vegetated wetland methane emissions for 2000–2025. We found that although total global emissions remained stable in the post-2020s, Northern Hemisphere emissions surged whilst tropical emissions fell. This approach allows us to rapidly monitor emissions and provides early warnings for climate impacts.
Katja Frieler, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, Simon Treu, Christian Otto, Jan Volkholz, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Stefanie Heinicke, Colin Jones, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Ryan Heneghan, Derek P. Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Dánnell Quesada-Chacón, Kerry Emanuel, Chia-Ying Lee, Suzana J. Camargo, Linn Hamester, Jonas Jägermeyr, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Lisa Novak, Inga J. Sauer, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala, Matthew Forrest, Michel Bechtold, Robert Reinecke, Inge de Graaf, Jed O. Kaplan, Alexander Koch, Matthieu Lengaigne, Rohini Kumar, and Maryna Strokal
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 4095–4135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-4095-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-4095-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes the experiments and data sets necessary to run historic and future impact projections, and the underlying assumptions of future climate change as defined by the 3rd round of the ISIMIP Project (Inter-sectoral Impactmodel Intercomparison Project, isimip.org). ISIMIP provides a framework for cross-sectorally consistent climate impact simulations to contribute to a comprehensive and consistent picture of the world under different climate-change scenarios.
Elizabeth Quaye, Ben T. Johnson, James M. Haywood, Guido R. van der Werf, Roland Vernooij, Stephen A. Sitch, and Tom Eames
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 6629–6654, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6629-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6629-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We find aerosol optical depths in a global climate model are overestimated during extreme wildfire events if emissions are scaled up by a factor of two, typically applied to improve simulated aerosol on seasonal–annual timescales. We propose a technique where a variable scaling factor is determined by fuel consumption, improving correlation in five fire-affected areas. We explore the impact of this change on aerosol radiative effects, during extreme events and on broader space and time scales.
Fang Li, David M. Lawrence, Brendan M. Rogers, Chantelle Burton, Huilin Huang, Yiquan Jiang, Johannes W. Kaiser, Matthew Kasoar, Hanna Lee, Ruby Leung, Lars Nieradzik, Aihui Wang, Daniel S. Ward, Ligeer Ce, Yangchun Li, Zhongda Lin, Apostolos Voulgarakis, and Yongkang Xue
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 3989–4007, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3989-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3989-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Extreme fire events are increasing, and fires are projected to rise across most regions, posing growing risks to ecosystems and society. As a key Earth system process, fire is now modeled in most Earth System Models (ESMs). FireMIP (Fire Modeling Intercomparison Project) within CMIP7 will evaluate fire simulations in state‑of‑the‑art ESMs, project future fire changes, and provide quantitative, process‑based understanding of fire's role in the Earth system.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Kjetil Aas, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Nicolas Bellouin, Alice Benoit-Cattin, Carla F. Berghoff, Raffaele Bernardello, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Nathan O. Collier, Thomas H. Colligan, Margot Cronin, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Matt P. Enright, Kazutaka Enyo, Michael Erb, Wiley Evans, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Filippa Fransner, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Jefferson Goncalves De Souza, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Bertrand Guenet, Özgür Gürses, Kirsty Harrington, Ian Harris, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Akihiko Ito, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Steve D. Jones, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Yawen Kong, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Charles Koven, Taro Kunimitsu, Xin Lan, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Zhu Liu, Claire Lo Monaco, Lei Ma, Gregg Marland, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Joe R. Melton, Natalie Monacci, Erwan Monier, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Jens D. Müller, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Lorna R. Nayagam, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nutzel, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Naiqing Pan, Sudhanshu Pandey, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Pierre Regnier, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, Ingunn Skjelvan, T. Luke Smallman, Victoria Spada, Mohanan G. Sreeush, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Didier Swingedouw, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Xiangjun Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Erik van Ooijen, Guido R. van der Werf, Sebastiaan J. van de Velde, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 3211–3288, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3211-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-3211-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2025 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2025). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Erika Solano-Romero, Carlota Segura-Garcia, M. Lucrecia Pettinari, Amin Khairoun, Miguel Ángel Torres-Vázquez, and Emilio Chuvieco
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-236, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-236, 2026
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
To better understand where and when the world’s most unusual fires occur, we created the first global database of extreme fire events for 2003 to 2022. Using satellite observations of burned land and fire energy, we identified 19,951 extreme events and found clear differences across regions and seasons. This new resource can help researchers and decision makers improve studies of climate, ecosystems, and future fire risk.
Derrick Muheki, Bas Vercruysse, Krishna Kumar Thirukokaranam Chandrasekar, Christophe Verbruggen, Julie M. Birkholz, Koen Hufkens, Hans Verbeeck, Pascal Boeckx, Seppe Lampe, Ed Hawkins, Peter Thorne, Dominique Kankonde Ntumba, Olivier Kapalay Moulasa, and Wim Thiery
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 3213–3255, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3213-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-3213-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Archives worldwide host vast records of observed weather data crucial for understanding climate variability. However, most of these records are still in paper form, limiting their use. To address this, we developed MeteoSaver, an open-source tool, to transcribe these records to machine-readable format. Applied to ten handwritten temperature sheets, it achieved a median accuracy of 74 %. This tool offers a promising solution to preserve records from archives and unlock historical weather insights.
Sasha Roewer, Lukas Fiedler, Marius Årthun, Willem Huiskamp, and Stefan Rahmstorf
Ocean Sci., 22, 1195–1211, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-1195-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/os-22-1195-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) is weakening in response to global warming, while the Nordic Seas Overturning Circulation (NOC) is projected to strengthen. We suggest a feedback mechanism in which a weakened AMOC leads to reduced salt transport into the North Atlantic, decreasing the density in that region and potentially strengthening the NOC.
William F. Lamb, Robbie M. Andrew, Matthew Jones, Zebedee Nicholls, Glen P. Peters, Chris Smith, Marielle Saunois, Giacomo Grassi, Julia Pongratz, Steven J. Smith, Francesco N. Tubiello, Monica Crippa, Matthew Gidden, Pierre Friedlingstein, Jan Minx, and Piers M. Forster
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 2549–2572, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2549-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2549-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores why global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions estimates vary. Key reasons include different coverage of gases and sectors, varying definitions of anthropogenic land use change emissions, and the Paris Agreement not covering all emission sources. The study highlights three main ways emissions data is reported, each with different objectives and resulting in varying global emission totals. It emphasizes the need for transparency in choosing datasets and setting assessment scopes.
Yifan Li, Drew Pendergrass, Daniel Jacob, Yunxiao Tang, Jiaxin Qiu, and Bo Zheng
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6284, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6284, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We tracked China’s weekly methane emissions from 2019 to 2024 by constructing a satellite-based regional atmospheric inversion framework. Over the period, annual methane emissions in China rose from 61.1 to 66.8 million tonnes, with nearly half of the growth driven by livestock, alongside additional contributions from waste and oil and gas. Emissions growth shifted toward previously low-emitting northwest and northeast China, revealing new priorities for targeted methane mitigation.
Martin Willett, Melissa Brooks, Andrew Bushell, Paul Earnshaw, Samantha Smith, Lorenzo Tomassini, Martin Best, Ian Boutle, Jennifer Brooke, John M. Edwards, Andrew D. Elvidge, Kalli Furtado, Catherine Hardacre, Andrew J. Hartley, Alan J. Hewitt, Ben Johnson, Adrian Lock, Andy Malcolm, Jane Mulcahy, Eike Müller, Ian A. Renfrew, Heather Rumbold, Gabriel G. Rooney, Alistair Sellar, Masashi Ujiie, Annelize van Niekerk, Andy Wiltshire, and Michael Whitall
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 1473–1517, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1473-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1473-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Global Atmosphere (GA) configurations of the Unified Model (UM) and Global Land (GL) configurations of Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES) are developed for use in any global atmospheric modelling application. We describe a recent iteration of these configurations, GA8GL9, which includes improvements to the representation of convection and other physical processes. GA8GL9 is used for operational weather prediction in the UK and forms the basis for the next GA and GL configuration.
Maria P. Velásquez-García, Richard J. Pope, Steven T. Turnock, Chetan Deva, David P. Moore, Guilherme Mataveli, Steve R. Arnold, Ruth M. Doherty, and Martyn P. Chipperfield
Biogeosciences, 23, 1341–1364, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1341-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1341-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Incorporating fire simulation into climate models is crucial for accurately representing interactions between fires, ecosystems, and climate, thereby enhancing climate projections. In South America, the INFERNO (Interactive Fires and Emissions algorithm for Natural Environments) fire model broadly captures CO emissions in active fire zones, e.g., the Amazon Arc of Deforestation. Still, it tends to overestimate emissions in tree-rich ecosystems, where INFERNO is too sensitive to low soil moisture, and to underestimate emissions in less tree-abundant ecosystems.
A. Park Williams, Winslow D. Hansen, Caroline S. Juang, John T. Abatzoglou, Volker C. Radeloff, Bowen Wang, Jazlynn Hall, Jatan Buch, and Gavin D. Madakumbura
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 1157–1191, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1157-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-1157-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The new Western United States Large Forest Fire Stochastic Simulator (WULFFSS) is a monthly gridded model to simulate forest fires across the western United States in response to vegetation, topographic, anthropogenic, and climate factors. The model is highly skillful, accounting for over 80 % of the observed variability in annual forest-fire area and capturing observed spatial, intra-annual variations, and trends.
Seppe Lampe, Lukas Gudmundsson, Basil Kraft, Stijn Hantson, Douglas Kelley, Vincent Humphrey, Bertrand Le Saux, Emilio Chuvieco, and Wim Thiery
Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 955–988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-955-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-955-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce BuRNN (BUrned area modelling by Recurrent Neural Networks), a model which estimates monthly burned area based on satellite observations and climate, vegetation, and socio-economic data using machine learning. BuRNN outperforms existing process-based fire models, which improves our capabilities of modelling past and future burned areas.
Claudia Di Biagio, Elisa Bru, Avila Orta, Servanne Chevaillier, Clarissa Baldo, Antonin Bergé, Mathieu Cazaunau, Sandra Lafon, Sophie Nowak, Edouard Pangui, Meinrat O. Andreae, Pavla Dagsson-Waldhauserova, Kebonyethata Dintwe, Konrad Kandler, James S. King, Amelie Chaput, Gregory S. Okin, Stuart Piketh, Thuraya Saeed, David Seibert, Zongbo Shi, Earle Williams, Pasquale Sellitto, and Paola Formenti
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 1079–1091, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1079-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-1079-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Spectroscopy measurements show that the absorbance of dust in the far-infrared up to 25 µm is comparable in intensity to that in the mid-infrared (3–15 µm) suggesting possible relevance for its direct radiative effect. Absorption signatures differ between Icelandic and low/mid-latitude dust due to differences in mineralogical composition. Spectral differences could be used to characterise the mineralogy and trace the origin of airborne dust based on infrared remote sensing observations.
Jie Fang, Yunjiang Zhang, Didier Hauglustaine, Bo Zheng, Ming Wang, Jingyi Li, Yong Sun, Haiwei Li, Junfeng Wang, Yun Wu, Bin Yuan, Mindong Chen, and Xinlei Ge
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 851–867, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-851-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-851-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Surface ozone pollution is a pressing global challenge driven by human activities and a warming climate. Using nationwide observations (2013–2023) across China together with satellite data, we developed a new machine learning approach to decouple the impacts of emission controls and weather changes. Our results show that while emission reductions improved ozone in some regions, climate change is increasingly offsetting these gains, underscoring the need for joint air quality and climate actions.
Hui Li, Philippe Ciais, Pramod Kumar, Didier A. Hauglustaine, Frédéric Chevallier, Grégoire Broquet, Dylan B. Millet, Kelley C. Wells, Jinghui Lian, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 7035–7054, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-7035-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-7035-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We present the first global, multi-year maps of monthly isoprene emissions (2013–2020) derived from satellite isoprene observations, averaging 456 TgC yr-1. The dataset reveals two emission peaks linked to 2015–2016 El Niño and 2019–2020 extreme heat events, driven mainly by tropical regions such as the Amazon. It highlights the region-specific sensitivity of biogenic isoprene emissions to temperature anomalies, providing new insights into their roles in air quality and climate feedbacks.
Tom Eames, Nick Schutgens, Eleftherios Ioannidis, Ivar R. van der Velde, Max J. van Gerrevink, Roland Vernooij, and Guido R. van der Werf
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 17429–17453, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17429-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17429-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Prescribed burning is used as a landscape management tool in southern African savannas. By deliberately changing the timing of fires in this region, the climate effect (radiative forcing) of a fire season can be altered. We show that by burning earlier in the dry season a small climate cooling effect can be achieved, similar to that of a 10 % reduction in global commercial aviation emissions. Local effects must be considered before implementing a fire regime shift for climate change mitigation.
Pere Joan Gelabert, Adrián Jiménez-Ruano, Clara Ochoa, Fermín Alcasena, Johan Sjöström, Christopher Marrs, Luís Mário Ribeiro, Palaiologos Palaiologou, Carmen Bentué Martínez, Emilio Chuvieco, Cristina Vega-García, and Marcos Rodrigues
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4713–4729, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4713-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-4713-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Wildfires threaten ecosystems and communities across Europe. Our study developed models to predict where and why these ignitions occur in different European environments. We found that weather anomalies and human factors, like proximity to urban areas and roads, are key drivers. Using Machine Learning our models achieved strong predictive accuracy. These insights help design better wildfire prevention strategies, ensuring safer landscapes and communities as fire risks grow with climate change.
Tanguy Postic, François de Coligny, Isabelle Chuine, Louis Devresse, Daniel Berveiller, Hervé Cochard, Matthias Cuntz, Nicolas Delpierre, Émilie Joetzjer, Jean-Marc Limousin, Jean-Marc Ourcival, François Pimont, Julien Ruffault, Guillaume Simioni, Nicolas K. Martin-StPaul, and Xavier Morin
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 7603–7679, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7603-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-7603-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
PHOREAU is a forest dynamic model that links plant traits with water use, growth, and climate responses to explore how species diversity affects productivity and resilience. Validated across European forests, PHOREAU simulates how tree communities function under drought and warming. Our findings support the use of trait-based modeling to guide forest adaptation strategies under future climate scenarios.
Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle Burton, Francesca Di Giuseppe, Matthew W. Jones, Maria L. F. Barbosa, Esther Brambleby, Joe R. McNorton, Zhongwei Liu, Anna S. I. Bradley, Katie Blackford, Eleanor Burke, Andrew Ciavarella, Enza Di Tomaso, Jonathan Eden, Igor José M. Ferreira, Lukas Fiedler, Andrew J. Hartley, Theodore R. Keeping, Seppe Lampe, Anna Lombardi, Guilherme Mataveli, Yuquan Qu, Patrícia S. Silva, Fiona R. Spuler, Carmen B. Steinmann, Miguel Ángel Torres-Vázquez, Renata Veiga, Dave van Wees, Jakob B. Wessel, Emily Wright, Bibiana Bilbao, Mathieu Bourbonnais, Cong Gao, Carlos M. Di Bella, Kebonye Dintwe, Victoria M. Donovan, Sarah Harris, Elena A. Kukavskaya, Aya Brigitte N'Dri, Cristina Santín, Galia Selaya, Johan Sjöström, John T. Abatzoglou, Niels Andela, Rachel Carmenta, Emilio Chuvieco, Louis Giglio, Douglas S. Hamilton, Stijn Hantson, Sarah Meier, Mark Parrington, Mojtaba Sadegh, Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz, Fernando Sedano, Marco Turco, Guido R. van der Werf, Sander Veraverbeke, Liana O. Anderson, Hamish Clarke, Paulo M. Fernandes, and Crystal A. Kolden
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 5377–5488, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5377-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5377-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The second State of Wildfires report examines extreme wildfire events from 2024 to early 2025. It analyses key regional events in Southern California, Northeast Amazonia, Pantanal–Chiquitano, and the Congo Basin, assessing their drivers and predictability and attributing them to climate change and land use. Seasonal outlooks and decadal projections are provided. Climate change greatly increased the likelihood of these fires, and without strong mitigation, such events will become more frequent.
Clément Bourgoin, René Beuchle, Alfredo Branco, João Carreiras, Guido Ceccherini, Duarte Oom, Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz, and Fernando Sedano
Biogeosciences, 22, 5247–5256, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-5247-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-5247-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Amazon forest faces increasing wildfires due to extreme drought and human activity. In 2024, disturbances surged by 152 %, hitting a 20-year high. Forest degradation from fires grew by over 400 %, exceeding that from deforestation. Brazil and Bolivia were hit hardest. These fires released huge amounts of CO2, 7 times more than in recent years, pushing the Amazon towards a dangerous tipping point. Urgent action is needed to prevent irreversible harm.
Pramod Kumar, Grégoire Broquet, Didier Hauglustaine, Maureen Beaudor, Lieven Clarisse, Martin Van Damme, Pierre Coheur, Anne Cozic, Bo Zheng, Beatriz Revilla Romero, Antony Delavois, and Philippe Ciais
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 12379–12407, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12379-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12379-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Global maps of the NH3 emissions over 2019–2022 are derived using IASI NH3 spaceborne observations, the LMDZ-INCA chemistry transport model at 1.27°×2.5° resolution, and the mass-balance approach. The average global NH3 emissions over the period are ~97 Tg NH3 yr-1, which is significantly higher than three reference inventories. The analysis provides confidence in the seasonal variability and regional budgets and provides new insights into NH3 emissions at global and regional scales.
Augustin Colette, Gaëlle Collin, François Besson, Etienne Blot, Vincent Guidard, Frédérik Meleux, Adrien Royer, Valentin Petiot, Claire Miller, Oihana Fermond, Alizé Jeant, Mario Adani, Joaquim Arteta, Anna Benedictow, Robert Bergström, Dene Bowdalo, Jorgen Brandt, Gino Briganti, Ana C. Carvalho, Jesper Heile Christensen, Florian Couvidat, Ilaria D'Elia, Massimo D'Isidoro, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Gaël Descombes, Enza Di Tomaso, John Douros, Jeronimo Escribano, Henk Eskes, Hilde Fagerli, Yalda Fatahi, Johannes Flemming, Elmar Friese, Lise Frohn, Michael Gauss, Camilla Geels, Guido Guarnieri, Marc Guevara, Antoine Guion, Jonathan Guth, Risto Hänninen, Kaj Hansen, Ulas Im, Ruud Janssen, Marine Jeoffrion, Mathieu Joly, Luke Jones, Oriol Jorba, Evgeni Kadantsev, Michael Kahnert, Jacek W. Kaminski, Rostislav Kouznetsov, Richard Kranenburg, Jeroen Kuenen, Anne Caroline Lange, Joachim Langner, Victor Lannuque, Francesca Macchia, Astrid Manders, Mihaela Mircea, Agnes Nyiri, Miriam Olid, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Yuliia Palamarchuk, Antonio Piersanti, Blandine Raux, Miha Razinger, Lennard Robertson, Arjo Segers, Martijn Schaap, Pilvi Siljamo, David Simpson, Mikhail Sofiev, Anders Stangel, Joanna Struzewska, Carles Tena, Renske Timmermans, Thanos Tsikerdekis, Svetlana Tsyro, Svyatoslav Tyuryakov, Anthony Ung, Andreas Uppstu, Alvaro Valdebenito, Peter van Velthoven, Lina Vitali, Zhuyun Ye, Vincent-Henri Peuch, and Laurence Rouïl
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 6835–6883, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6835-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-6835-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service – Regional Production delivers daily forecasts, analyses, and reanalyses of air quality in Europe. The service relies on a distributed modelling production by 11 leading European modelling teams following stringent requirements with an operational design that has no equivalent in the world. All the products are free, open, and quality-assured and disseminated with a high level of reliability.
Kirsty J. Pringle, Richard Rigby, Steven T. Turnock, Carly L. Reddington, Meruyert Shayakhmetova, Malcolm Illingworth, Denis Barclay, Neil Chue Hong, Ed Hawkins, Douglas S. Hamilton, Ethan Brain, and James B. McQuaid
Geosci. Commun., 8, 229–236, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-8-229-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-8-229-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Air Quality Stripes images visualise historical changes in particulate matter air pollution in over 150 cities worldwide. The project celebrates significant improvements in air quality in regions like Europe, North America, and China while highlighting the urgent need for action in areas such as central Asia. Designed to raise awareness, the images aim to inspire discussions about the critical impact of air pollution and the global inequalities it causes.
Renata Moura da Veiga, Celso von Randow, Chantelle Burton, Douglas I. Kelley, Manoel Cardoso, and Fabiano Morelli
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3581–3601, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3581-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3581-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We systematically reviewed 77 papers to understand the Cerrado’s fire emissions within the global carbon budget by evaluating how fire parameters can inform emission estimates and mitigation strategies. Estimating fire emissions in the Cerrado requires a holistic approach, combining fire carbon emission estimates, fire dynamic parameters, and fire management and policy. We highlight key research gaps that could provide more comprehensive insights into accounting for fire emissions in the Cerrado.
Anastasios Rovithakis, Eleanor Burke, Chantelle Burton, Matthew Kasoar, Manolis G. Grillakis, Konstantinos D. Seiradakis, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 3185–3200, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3185-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-3185-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We used a land surface computer model to forecast how climate change will impact wildfires in Greece. Our results show a significant increase in future burnt area due to hotter, drier climate. Allowing vegetation to change with the climate lessens this increase overall, since fire is no longer igniting in areas already burnt, and it even led to projected decreases in the agricultural areas in the north of the country.
Emmanouil Proestakis, Vassilis Amiridis, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Svetlana Tsyro, Jan Griesfeller, Antonis Gkikas, Thanasis Georgiou, María Gonçalves Ageitos, Jeronimo Escribano, Stelios Myriokefalitakis, Elisa Bergas Masso, Enza Di Tomaso, Sara Basart, Jan-Berend W. Stuut, and Angela Benedetti
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 4351–4395, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4351-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4351-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Quantification of dust deposition into the broader Atlantic Ocean is provided, with the estimates established based on Earth observations. The dataset is considered unique with respect to a range of applications, including compensating for spatiotemporal gaps of sediment-trap measurements, assessments of model simulations, shedding light on physical processes related to the dust cycle, and improving the understanding of dust biogeochemical impacts on oceanic ecosystems, weather, and climate.
Zhixuan Guo, Wei Li, Philippe Ciais, Stephen Sitch, Guido R. van der Werf, Simon P. K. Bowring, Ana Bastos, Florent Mouillot, Jiaying He, Minxuan Sun, Lei Zhu, Xiaomeng Du, Nan Wang, and Xiaomeng Huang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 3599–3618, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3599-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3599-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
To address the limitations of short time spans in satellite data and spatiotemporal discontinuity in site records, we reconstructed global monthly burned area maps at a 0.5° resolution for 1901–2020 using machine learning models. The global burned area is predicted at 3.46 × 106–4.58 × 106 km² per year, showing a decline from 1901 to 1978, an increase from 1978 to 2008 and a sharper decrease from 2008 to 2020. This dataset provides a benchmark for studies on fire ecology and the carbon cycle.
Rimal Abeed, Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, Grégoire Broquet, Robin Plauchu, Isabelle Pison, Antoine Berchet, Elise Potier, Bo Zheng, Gaëlle Dufour, Adriana Coman, Dilek Savas, Guillaume Siour, Henk Eskes, Beatriz Revilla-Romero, Antony Delavois, and Philippe Ciais
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3329, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3329, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate changes in air pollution from nitrogen oxides NOx (=NO+NO2) across Eastern China from 2019 to 2021, using a satellite-based modelling approach. Our results show a drop in pollution in 2020 in most provinces, and along the China-Mongolia-Russia Economic Corridor. The analysis also captures emission variations during the Lunar New Year. By estimating emissions at the provincial level, the study provides insights into how major events and policy measures influence local air quality.
Anna C. Talucci, Michael M. Loranty, Jean E. Holloway, Brendan M. Rogers, Heather D. Alexander, Natalie Baillargeon, Jennifer L. Baltzer, Logan T. Berner, Amy Breen, Leya Brodt, Brian Buma, Jacqueline Dean, Clement J. F. Delcourt, Lucas R. Diaz, Catherine M. Dieleman, Thomas A. Douglas, Gerald V. Frost, Benjamin V. Gaglioti, Rebecca E. Hewitt, Teresa Hollingsworth, M. Torre Jorgenson, Mark J. Lara, Rachel A. Loehman, Michelle C. Mack, Kristen L. Manies, Christina Minions, Susan M. Natali, Jonathan A. O'Donnell, David Olefeldt, Alison K. Paulson, Adrian V. Rocha, Lisa B. Saperstein, Tatiana A. Shestakova, Seeta Sistla, Oleg Sizov, Andrey Soromotin, Merritt R. Turetsky, Sander Veraverbeke, and Michelle A. Walvoord
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2887–2909, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2887-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2887-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Wildfires have the potential to accelerate permafrost thaw and the associated feedbacks to climate change. We assembled a dataset of permafrost thaw depth measurements from burned and unburned sites contributed by researchers from across the northern high-latitude region. We estimated maximum thaw depth for each measurement, which addresses a key challenge: the ability to assess impacts of wildfire on maximum thaw depth when measurement timing varies.
Santiago Botía, Saqr Munassar, Thomas Koch, Danilo Custodio, Luana S. Basso, Shujiro Komiya, Jost V. Lavric, David Walter, Manuel Gloor, Giordane Martins, Stijn Naus, Gerbrand Koren, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Stijn Hantson, John B. Miller, Wouter Peters, Christian Rödenbeck, and Christoph Gerbig
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6219–6255, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6219-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6219-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses dry CO2 mole fractions from the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory together with airborne profiles to estimate net carbon exchange in tropical South America. We found that the biogeographic Amazon is a net carbon sink, while the Cerrado and Caatinga biomes are net carbon sources, resulting in an overall neutral balance. Finally, to further reduce the uncertainty in our estimates we call for an expansion of the monitoring capacity, especially in the Amazon–Andes foothills.
Piers M. Forster, Chris Smith, Tristram Walsh, William F. Lamb, Robin Lamboll, Christophe Cassou, Mathias Hauser, Zeke Hausfather, June-Yi Lee, Matthew D. Palmer, Karina von Schuckmann, Aimée B. A. Slangen, Sophie Szopa, Blair Trewin, Jeongeun Yun, Nathan P. Gillett, Stuart Jenkins, H. Damon Matthews, Krishnan Raghavan, Aurélien Ribes, Joeri Rogelj, Debbie Rosen, Xuebin Zhang, Myles Allen, Lara Aleluia Reis, Robbie M. Andrew, Richard A. Betts, Alex Borger, Jiddu A. Broersma, Samantha N. Burgess, Lijing Cheng, Pierre Friedlingstein, Catia M. Domingues, Marco Gambarini, Thomas Gasser, Johannes Gütschow, Masayoshi Ishii, Christopher Kadow, John Kennedy, Rachel E. Killick, Paul B. Krummel, Aurélien Liné, Didier P. Monselesan, Colin Morice, Jens Mühle, Vaishali Naik, Glen P. Peters, Anna Pirani, Julia Pongratz, Jan C. Minx, Matthew Rigby, Robert Rohde, Abhishek Savita, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Peter Thorne, Christopher Wells, Luke M. Western, Guido R. van der Werf, Susan E. Wijffels, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, and Panmao Zhai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2641–2680, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2641-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2641-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In a rapidly changing climate, evidence-based decision-making benefits from up-to-date and timely information. Here we compile monitoring datasets to track real-world changes over time. To make our work relevant to policymakers, we follow methods from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Human activities are increasing the Earth's energy imbalance and driving faster sea-level rise compared to the IPCC assessment.
Maria Lucia Ferreira Barbosa, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle A. Burton, Igor J. M. Ferreira, Renata Moura da Veiga, Anna Bradley, Paulo Guilherme Molin, and Liana O. Anderson
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3533–3557, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3533-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3533-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
As fire seasons in Brazil become increasingly severe, confidently understanding the factors driving fires is more critical than ever. To address this challenge, we developed FLAME (Fire Landscape Analysis using Maximum Entropy), a new model designed to predict fires and to analyse the spatial influence of both environmental and human factors while accounting for uncertainties. By adapting the model to different regions, we can enhance fire management strategies, making FLAME a powerful tool for protecting landscapes in Brazil and beyond.
Yawen Kong, Bo Zheng, and Yuxi Liu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 5959–5976, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5959-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-5959-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Current high-resolution satellite remote sensing technologies provide a unique opportunity to derive timely high-resolution emission data. We developed an emission inversion system to assimilate satellite NO2 data to obtain daily kilometer-scale NOx emission inventories. Our results enhance inventory accuracy, allowing us to capture the effects of pollution control policies on daily emissions (e.g., during COVID-19 lockdowns) and improve fine-scale air quality modeling.
Cynthia H. Whaley, Tim Butler, Jose A. Adame, Rupal Ambulkar, Steve R. Arnold, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Benjamin Gaubert, Douglas S. Hamilton, Min Huang, Hayley Hung, Johannes W. Kaiser, Jacek W. Kaminski, Christoph Knote, Gerbrand Koren, Jean-Luc Kouassi, Meiyun Lin, Tianjia Liu, Jianmin Ma, Kasemsan Manomaiphiboon, Elisa Bergas Masso, Jessica L. McCarty, Mariano Mertens, Mark Parrington, Helene Peiro, Pallavi Saxena, Saurabh Sonwani, Vanisa Surapipith, Damaris Y. T. Tan, Wenfu Tang, Veerachai Tanpipat, Kostas Tsigaridis, Christine Wiedinmyer, Oliver Wild, Yuanyu Xie, and Paquita Zuidema
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3265–3309, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3265-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3265-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The multi-model experiment design of the HTAP3 Fires project takes a multi-pollutant approach to improving our understanding of transboundary transport of wildland fire and agricultural burning emissions and their impacts. The experiments are designed with the goal of answering science policy questions related to fires. The options for the multi-model approach, including inputs, outputs, and model setup, are discussed, and the official recommendations for the project are presented.
Marielle Saunois, Adrien Martinez, Benjamin Poulter, Zhen Zhang, Peter A. Raymond, Pierre Regnier, Josep G. Canadell, Robert B. Jackson, Prabir K. Patra, Philippe Bousquet, Philippe Ciais, Edward J. Dlugokencky, Xin Lan, George H. Allen, David Bastviken, David J. Beerling, Dmitry A. Belikov, Donald R. Blake, Simona Castaldi, Monica Crippa, Bridget R. Deemer, Fraser Dennison, Giuseppe Etiope, Nicola Gedney, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Meredith A. Holgerson, Peter O. Hopcroft, Gustaf Hugelius, Akihiko Ito, Atul K. Jain, Rajesh Janardanan, Matthew S. Johnson, Thomas Kleinen, Paul B. Krummel, Ronny Lauerwald, Tingting Li, Xiangyu Liu, Kyle C. McDonald, Joe R. Melton, Jens Mühle, Jurek Müller, Fabiola Murguia-Flores, Yosuke Niwa, Sergio Noce, Shufen Pan, Robert J. Parker, Changhui Peng, Michel Ramonet, William J. Riley, Gerard Rocher-Ros, Judith A. Rosentreter, Motoki Sasakawa, Arjo Segers, Steven J. Smith, Emily H. Stanley, Joël Thanwerdas, Hanqin Tian, Aki Tsuruta, Francesco N. Tubiello, Thomas S. Weber, Guido R. van der Werf, Douglas E. J. Worthy, Yi Xi, Yukio Yoshida, Wenxin Zhang, Bo Zheng, Qing Zhu, Qiuan Zhu, and Qianlai Zhuang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1873–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1873-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1873-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Methane (CH4) is the second most important human-influenced greenhouse gas in terms of climate forcing after carbon dioxide (CO2). A consortium of multi-disciplinary scientists synthesise and update the budget of the sources and sinks of CH4. This edition benefits from important progress in estimating emissions from lakes and ponds, reservoirs, and streams and rivers. For the 2010s decade, global CH4 emissions are estimated at 575 Tg CH4 yr-1, including ~65 % from anthropogenic sources.
Joseph W. Gallear, Marcelo Valadares Galdos, Marcelo Zeri, and Andrew Hartley
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 1521–1541, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1521-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-25-1521-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In Brazil, drought is of national concern and can have major consequences for agriculture. Here, we determine how to develop forecasts for drought stress on vegetation health using machine learning. Results aim to inform future developments in operational drought monitoring at the National Centre for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disasters (CEMADEN) in Brazil. This information is essential for disaster preparedness and planning of future actions to support areas affected by drought.
Ngoc Thi Nhu Do, Kengo Sudo, Akihiko Ito, Louisa K. Emmons, Vaishali Naik, Kostas Tsigaridis, Øyvind Seland, Gerd A. Folberth, and Douglas I. Kelley
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2079–2109, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2079-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2079-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding historical isoprene emission changes is important for predicting future climate, but trends and their controlling factors remain uncertain. This study shows that long-term isoprene trends vary among Earth system models mainly due to partially incorporating CO2 effects and land cover changes rather than to climate. Future models that refine these factors’ effects on isoprene emissions, along with long-term observations, are essential for better understanding plant–climate interactions.
Zhu Deng, Philippe Ciais, Liting Hu, Adrien Martinez, Marielle Saunois, Rona L. Thompson, Kushal Tibrewal, Wouter Peters, Brendan Byrne, Giacomo Grassi, Paul I. Palmer, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Zhu Liu, Junjie Liu, Xuekun Fang, Tengjiao Wang, Hanqin Tian, Katsumasa Tanaka, Ana Bastos, Stephen Sitch, Benjamin Poulter, Clément Albergel, Aki Tsuruta, Shamil Maksyutov, Rajesh Janardanan, Yosuke Niwa, Bo Zheng, Joël Thanwerdas, Dmitry Belikov, Arjo Segers, and Frédéric Chevallier
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1121–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1121-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1121-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study reconciles national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories with updated atmospheric inversion results to evaluate discrepancies for three principal GHG fluxes at the national level. Compared to our previous study, new satellite-based CO2 inversions were included and an updated mask of managed lands was used, improving agreement for Brazil and Canada. The proposed methodology can be regularly applied as a check to assess the gap between top-down inversions and bottom-up inventories.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Hongmei Li, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Almut Arneth, Vivek Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Carla F. Berghoff, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Patricia Cadule, Katie Campbell, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Thomas Colligan, Jeanne Decayeux, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Carolina Duran Rojas, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Amanda R. Fay, Richard A. Feely, Daniel J. Ford, Adrianna Foster, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul K. Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Xin Lan, Siv K. Lauvset, Nathalie Lefèvre, Zhu Liu, Junjie Liu, Lei Ma, Shamil Maksyutov, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, Eric J. Morgan, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Craig Neill, Yosuke Niwa, Tobias Nützel, Lea Olivier, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Denis Pierrot, Zhangcai Qin, Laure Resplandy, Alizée Roobaert, Thais M. Rosan, Christian Rödenbeck, Jörg Schwinger, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Roland Séférian, Shintaro Takao, Hiroaki Tatebe, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Olivier Torres, Etienne Tourigny, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido van der Werf, Rik Wanninkhof, Xuhui Wang, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Zhen Yu, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Ning Zeng, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 965–1039, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2024 describes the methodology, main results, and datasets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2024). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Paulo M. Fernandes, Nuno G. Guiomar, and Ana Sá
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-587, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-587, 2025
Manuscript not accepted for further review
Short summary
Short summary
Mapping vegetation as fuel is important for understanding and managing wildfires. Aragoneses et al. (2023) created a European fuel map, but their method has flaws. The fuel types don’t match real fire behavior, and key vegetation metrics were mapped using unreliable methods. The map’s low detail and oversimplified approach caused it to overestimate fire risk in areas with less flammable vegetation, limiting its usefulness for wildfire research and planning.
Mingrui Ma, Jiachen Cao, Dan Tong, Bo Zheng, and Yu Zhao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2147–2166, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2147-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2147-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We combined two global climate change pathways and three national emission control scenarios to analyze the future evolution of reactive nitrogen (Nr) deposition till the 2060s in China with air quality modeling. We show China’s clean air and carbon neutrality policies would overcome the adverse effects of climate change and efficiently reduce Nr deposition. The outflow of Nr fluxes from mainland China to the west Pacific would also be clearly reduced from continuous stringent emission controls.
Hui Li, Jiaxin Qiu, and Bo Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1949–1963, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1949-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1949-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We conduct a sensitivity analysis with 31 tests on various factors including prior emissions, model resolution, satellite constraint, and other system configurations to assess the vulnerability of emission estimates across temporal, sectoral, and regional dimensions. This reveals the robustness of emissions estimated by this air-pollution-satellite-based CO2 emission inversion system, with relative change between tests and base inversion below 4.0 % for national annual NOx and CO2 emissions.
Arsène Druel, Julien Ruffault, Hendrik Davi, André Chanzy, Olivier Marloie, Miquel De Cáceres, Albert Olioso, Florent Mouillot, Christophe François, Kamel Soudani, and Nicolas K. Martin-StPaul
Biogeosciences, 22, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate radiation data are essential for understanding ecosystem functions and dynamics. Traditional large-scale data lack the precision needed for complex terrain. This study introduces a new model, which accounts for sub-daily direct and diffuse radiation effects caused by terrain features, to enhance the radiation data resolution using elevation maps. Tested on a mountainous area, this method significantly improved radiation estimates, benefiting predictions of forest functions.
Raphaël d'Andrimont, Momchil Yordanov, Fernando Sedano, Astrid Verhegghen, Peter Strobl, Savvas Zachariadis, Flavia Camilleri, Alessandra Palmieri, Beatrice Eiselt, Jose Miguel Rubio Iglesias, and Marijn van der Velde
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 5723–5735, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5723-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-5723-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey (LUCAS) Copernicus 2022 is a large and systematic in situ field survey of 137 966 polygons over the European Union in 2022. The data contain 82 land cover classes and 40 land use classes.
Lucas R. Diaz, Clement J. F. Delcourt, Moritz Langer, Michael M. Loranty, Brendan M. Rogers, Rebecca C. Scholten, Tatiana A. Shestakova, Anna C. Talucci, Jorien E. Vonk, Sonam Wangchuk, and Sander Veraverbeke
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 1459–1482, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1459-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-1459-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our study in eastern Siberia investigated how fires affect permafrost thaw depth in larch forests. We found that fire induces deeper thaw, yet this process was mediated by topography and vegetation. By combining field and satellite data, we estimated summer thaw depth across an entire fire scar. This research provides insights into post-fire permafrost dynamics and the use of satellite data for mapping fire-induced permafrost thaw.
Liu Yan, Qiang Zhang, Bo Zheng, and Kebin He
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4497–4509, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4497-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4497-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
A new database of fuel-, vehicle-type-, and age-specific CO2 emissions from global on-road vehicles from 1970 to 2020 is developed with the fleet turnover model built in this study. Based on this database, the evolution of the global vehicle stock over 50 years is analyzed, the dominant emission contributors by vehicle and fuel type are identified, and the age distribution of on-road CO2 emissions is characterized further.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Glen P. Peters, Richard Engelen, Sander Houweling, Dominik Brunner, Aki Tsuruta, Bradley Matthews, Prabir K. Patra, Dmitry Belikov, Rona L. Thompson, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Wenxin Zhang, Arjo J. Segers, Giuseppe Etiope, Giancarlo Ciotoli, Philippe Peylin, Frédéric Chevallier, Tuula Aalto, Robbie M. Andrew, David Bastviken, Antoine Berchet, Grégoire Broquet, Giulia Conchedda, Stijn N. C. Dellaert, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Johannes Gütschow, Jean-Matthieu Haussaire, Ronny Lauerwald, Tiina Markkanen, Jacob C. A. van Peet, Isabelle Pison, Pierre Regnier, Espen Solum, Marko Scholze, Maria Tenkanen, Francesco N. Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, and John R. Worden
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4325–4350, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4325-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4325-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides an overview of data availability from observation- and inventory-based CH4 emission estimates. It systematically compares them and provides recommendations for robust comparisons, aiming to steadily engage more parties in using observational methods to complement their UNFCCC submissions. Anticipating improvements in atmospheric modelling and observations, future developments need to resolve knowledge gaps in both approaches and to better quantify remaining uncertainty.
Henk Eskes, Athanasios Tsikerdekis, Melanie Ades, Mihai Alexe, Anna Carlin Benedictow, Yasmine Bennouna, Lewis Blake, Idir Bouarar, Simon Chabrillat, Richard Engelen, Quentin Errera, Johannes Flemming, Sebastien Garrigues, Jan Griesfeller, Vincent Huijnen, Luka Ilić, Antje Inness, John Kapsomenakis, Zak Kipling, Bavo Langerock, Augustin Mortier, Mark Parrington, Isabelle Pison, Mikko Pitkänen, Samuel Remy, Andreas Richter, Anja Schoenhardt, Michael Schulz, Valerie Thouret, Thorsten Warneke, Christos Zerefos, and Vincent-Henri Peuch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 9475–9514, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9475-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9475-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) provides global analyses and forecasts of aerosols and trace gases in the atmosphere. On 27 June 2023 a major upgrade, Cy48R1, became operational. Comparisons with in situ, surface remote sensing, aircraft, and balloon and satellite observations show that the new CAMS system is a significant improvement. The results quantify the skill of CAMS to forecast impactful events, such as wildfires, dust storms and air pollution peaks.
Bhupinderjeet Singh, Mingliang Liu, John Abatzoglou, Jennifer Adam, and Kirti Rajagopalan
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2284, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2284, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Hydrology models rely on simplistic static approaches to precipitation phase partitioning. We evaluate model skill changes for a suite of snow metrics by transitioning to a more accurate dynamic partitioning. We found that the transition resulted in a better match between modeled and observed metrics, with a 50 % reduction in model bias, emphasizing the need for the hydrological modeling community to adopt dynamic partitioning.
Matthew W. Jones, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle A. Burton, Francesca Di Giuseppe, Maria Lucia F. Barbosa, Esther Brambleby, Andrew J. Hartley, Anna Lombardi, Guilherme Mataveli, Joe R. McNorton, Fiona R. Spuler, Jakob B. Wessel, John T. Abatzoglou, Liana O. Anderson, Niels Andela, Sally Archibald, Dolors Armenteras, Eleanor Burke, Rachel Carmenta, Emilio Chuvieco, Hamish Clarke, Stefan H. Doerr, Paulo M. Fernandes, Louis Giglio, Douglas S. Hamilton, Stijn Hantson, Sarah Harris, Piyush Jain, Crystal A. Kolden, Tiina Kurvits, Seppe Lampe, Sarah Meier, Stacey New, Mark Parrington, Morgane M. G. Perron, Yuquan Qu, Natasha S. Ribeiro, Bambang H. Saharjo, Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz, Jacquelyn K. Shuman, Veerachai Tanpipat, Guido R. van der Werf, Sander Veraverbeke, and Gavriil Xanthopoulos
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3601–3685, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This inaugural State of Wildfires report catalogues extreme fires of the 2023–2024 fire season. For key events, we analyse their predictability and drivers and attribute them to climate change and land use. We provide a seasonal outlook and decadal projections. Key anomalies occurred in Canada, Greece, and western Amazonia, with other high-impact events catalogued worldwide. Climate change significantly increased the likelihood of extreme fires, and mitigation is required to lessen future risk.
Julia Kelly, Stefan H. Doerr, Johan Ekroos, Theresa S. Ibáñez, Md. Rafikul Islam, Cristina Santín, Margarida Soares, and Natascha Kljun
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2016, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We measured soil carbon fluxes during the first four years after a wildfire in the Swedish boreal forest. Soil CO2 emissions decreased substantially only when trees were killed by fire or by post-fire logging, but not when trees survived the fire and were left standing. Soil methane flux was not affected by fire. Logging trees already killed by fire had no additional impact on soil carbon fluxes. Post-fire forest management strategy impacted vegetation regrowth and carbon dynamics.
Claire L. Ryder, Clément Bézier, Helen F. Dacre, Rory Clarkson, Vassilis Amiridis, Eleni Marinou, Emmanouil Proestakis, Zak Kipling, Angela Benedetti, Mark Parrington, Samuel Rémy, and Mark Vaughan
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 2263–2284, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2263-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-2263-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Desert dust poses a hazard to aircraft via degradation of engine components. This has financial implications for the aviation industry and results in increased fuel burn with climate impacts. Here we quantify dust ingestion by aircraft engines at airports worldwide. We find Dubai and Delhi in summer are among the dustiest airports, where substantial engine degradation would occur after 1000 flights. Dust ingestion can be reduced by changing take-off times and the altitude of holding patterns.
Yavar Pourmohamad, John T. Abatzoglou, Erin J. Belval, Erica Fleishman, Karen Short, Matthew C. Reeves, Nicholas Nauslar, Philip E. Higuera, Eric Henderson, Sawyer Ball, Amir AghaKouchak, Jeffrey P. Prestemon, Julia Olszewski, and Mojtaba Sadegh
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3045–3060, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3045-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3045-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The FPA FOD-Attributes dataset provides > 300 biological, physical, social, and administrative attributes associated with > 2.3×106 wildfire incidents across the US from 1992 to 2020. The dataset can be used to (1) answer numerous questions about the covariates associated with human- and lightning-caused wildfires and (2) support descriptive, diagnostic, predictive, and prescriptive wildfire analytics, including the development of machine learning models.
Hanqin Tian, Naiqing Pan, Rona L. Thompson, Josep G. Canadell, Parvadha Suntharalingam, Pierre Regnier, Eric A. Davidson, Michael Prather, Philippe Ciais, Marilena Muntean, Shufen Pan, Wilfried Winiwarter, Sönke Zaehle, Feng Zhou, Robert B. Jackson, Hermann W. Bange, Sarah Berthet, Zihao Bian, Daniele Bianchi, Alexander F. Bouwman, Erik T. Buitenhuis, Geoffrey Dutton, Minpeng Hu, Akihiko Ito, Atul K. Jain, Aurich Jeltsch-Thömmes, Fortunat Joos, Sian Kou-Giesbrecht, Paul B. Krummel, Xin Lan, Angela Landolfi, Ronny Lauerwald, Ya Li, Chaoqun Lu, Taylor Maavara, Manfredi Manizza, Dylan B. Millet, Jens Mühle, Prabir K. Patra, Glen P. Peters, Xiaoyu Qin, Peter Raymond, Laure Resplandy, Judith A. Rosentreter, Hao Shi, Qing Sun, Daniele Tonina, Francesco N. Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Vuichard, Junjie Wang, Kelley C. Wells, Luke M. Western, Chris Wilson, Jia Yang, Yuanzhi Yao, Yongfa You, and Qing Zhu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2543–2604, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2543-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2543-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Atmospheric concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O), a greenhouse gas 273 times more potent than carbon dioxide, have increased by 25 % since the preindustrial period, with the highest observed growth rate in 2020 and 2021. This rapid growth rate has primarily been due to a 40 % increase in anthropogenic emissions since 1980. Observed atmospheric N2O concentrations in recent years have exceeded the worst-case climate scenario, underscoring the importance of reducing anthropogenic N2O emissions.
Piers M. Forster, Chris Smith, Tristram Walsh, William F. Lamb, Robin Lamboll, Bradley Hall, Mathias Hauser, Aurélien Ribes, Debbie Rosen, Nathan P. Gillett, Matthew D. Palmer, Joeri Rogelj, Karina von Schuckmann, Blair Trewin, Myles Allen, Robbie Andrew, Richard A. Betts, Alex Borger, Tim Boyer, Jiddu A. Broersma, Carlo Buontempo, Samantha Burgess, Chiara Cagnazzo, Lijing Cheng, Pierre Friedlingstein, Andrew Gettelman, Johannes Gütschow, Masayoshi Ishii, Stuart Jenkins, Xin Lan, Colin Morice, Jens Mühle, Christopher Kadow, John Kennedy, Rachel E. Killick, Paul B. Krummel, Jan C. Minx, Gunnar Myhre, Vaishali Naik, Glen P. Peters, Anna Pirani, Julia Pongratz, Carl-Friedrich Schleussner, Sonia I. Seneviratne, Sophie Szopa, Peter Thorne, Mahesh V. M. Kovilakam, Elisa Majamäki, Jukka-Pekka Jalkanen, Margreet van Marle, Rachel M. Hoesly, Robert Rohde, Dominik Schumacher, Guido van der Werf, Russell Vose, Kirsten Zickfeld, Xuebin Zhang, Valérie Masson-Delmotte, and Panmao Zhai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 2625–2658, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2625-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2625-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
This paper tracks some key indicators of global warming through time, from 1850 through to the end of 2023. It is designed to give an authoritative estimate of global warming to date and its causes. We find that in 2023, global warming reached 1.3 °C and is increasing at over 0.2 °C per decade. This is caused by all-time-high greenhouse gas emissions.
Adrianus de Laat, Vincent Huijnen, Niels Andela, and Matthias Forkel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-732, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-732, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
This study assesses state-of-the art and more advanced and innovative satellite-observation-based (bottom-up) wildfire emission estimates. They are evaluated by comparison with satellite observation of single fire emission plumes. Results indicate that more advanced fire emission estimates – more information – are more realistic but that especially for a limited number of very large fires certain differences remain – for unknown reasons.
Katie R. Blackford, Matthew Kasoar, Chantelle Burton, Eleanor Burke, Iain Colin Prentice, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 3063–3079, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3063-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Peatlands are globally important stores of carbon which are being increasingly threatened by wildfires with knock-on effects on the climate system. Here we introduce a novel peat fire parameterization in the northern high latitudes to the INFERNO global fire model. Representing peat fires increases annual burnt area across the high latitudes, alongside improvements in how we capture year-to-year variation in burning and emissions.
Laura M. Pereira, Ignacio Gianelli, Therezah Achieng, Diva Amon, Sally Archibald, Suchinta Arif, Azucena Castro, Tapiwa Prosper Chimbadzwa, Kaera Coetzer, Tracy-Lynn Field, Odirilwe Selomane, Nadia Sitas, Nicola Stevens, Sebastian Villasante, Mohammed Armani, Duncan M. Kimuyu, Ibukun J. Adewumi, David M. Lapola, David Obura, Patricia Pinho, Felipe Roa-Clavijo, Juan Rocha, and U. Rashid Sumaila
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 341–366, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-341-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-341-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Narratives around tipping points, such as the need for
positivetipping points in energy transitions to avoid
negativeEarth system tipping points, do not take into account the entire spectrum of impacts the proposed interventions could have or still rely on narratives that maintain current unsustainable behaviours and marginalize many people. We unpack these ideas in the context of what they mean for the concept of tipping points, using a critical decolonial view from the Global South.
Jonas Mortelmans, Anne Felsberg, Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy, Sander Veraverbeke, Robert D. Field, Niels Andela, and Michel Bechtold
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 445–464, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-445-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-445-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
With global warming increasing the frequency and intensity of wildfires in the boreal region, accurate risk assessments are becoming more crucial than ever before. The Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) is a renowned system, yet its effectiveness in peatlands, where hydrology plays a key role, is limited. By incorporating groundwater data from numerical models and satellite observations, our modified FWI improves the accuracy of fire danger predictions, especially over summer.
Joanne V. Hall, Fernanda Argueta, Maria Zubkova, Yang Chen, James T. Randerson, and Louis Giglio
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 867–885, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-867-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-867-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Crop-residue burning is a widespread practice often occurring close to population centers. Its recurrent nature requires accurate mapping of the area burned – a key input into air quality models. Unlike larger fires, crop fires require a specific burned area (BA) methodology, which to date has been ignored in global BA datasets. Our global cropland-focused BA product found a significant increase in global cropland BA (81 Mha annual average) compared to the widely used MCD64A1 (32 Mha).
Xiaoxia Shang, Antti Lipponen, Maria Filioglou, Anu-Maija Sundström, Mark Parrington, Virginie Buchard, Anton S. Darmenov, Ellsworth J. Welton, Eleni Marinou, Vassilis Amiridis, Michael Sicard, Alejandro Rodríguez-Gómez, Mika Komppula, and Tero Mielonen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1329–1344, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1329-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1329-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In June 2019, smoke particles from a Canadian wildfire event were transported to Europe. The long-range-transported smoke plumes were monitored with a spaceborne lidar and reanalysis models. Based on the aerosol mass concentrations estimated from the observations, the reanalysis models had difficulties in reproducing the amount and location of the smoke aerosols during the transport event. Consequently, more spaceborne lidar missions are needed for reliable monitoring of aerosol plumes.
Joe R. McNorton and Francesca Di Giuseppe
Biogeosciences, 21, 279–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-279-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-279-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Wildfires have wide-ranging consequences for local communities, air quality and ecosystems. Vegetation amount and moisture state are key components to forecast wildfires. We developed a combined model and satellite framework to characterise vegetation, including the type of fuel, whether it is alive or dead, and its moisture content. The daily data is at high resolution globally (~9 km). Our characteristics correlate with active fire data and can inform fire danger and spread modelling efforts.
Thomas D. Hessilt, Brendan M. Rogers, Rebecca C. Scholten, Stefano Potter, Thomas A. J. Janssen, and Sander Veraverbeke
Biogeosciences, 21, 109–129, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-109-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-109-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In boreal North America, snow and frozen ground prevail in winter, while fires occur in summer. Over the last 20 years, the northwestern parts have experienced earlier snow disappearance and more ignitions. This is opposite to the southeastern parts. However, earlier ignitions following earlier snow disappearance timing led to larger fires across the region. Snow disappearance timing may be a good proxy for ignition timing and may also influence important atmospheric conditions related to fires.
Katja Frieler, Jan Volkholz, Stefan Lange, Jacob Schewe, Matthias Mengel, María del Rocío Rivas López, Christian Otto, Christopher P. O. Reyer, Dirk Nikolaus Karger, Johanna T. Malle, Simon Treu, Christoph Menz, Julia L. Blanchard, Cheryl S. Harrison, Colleen M. Petrik, Tyler D. Eddy, Kelly Ortega-Cisneros, Camilla Novaglio, Yannick Rousseau, Reg A. Watson, Charles Stock, Xiao Liu, Ryan Heneghan, Derek Tittensor, Olivier Maury, Matthias Büchner, Thomas Vogt, Tingting Wang, Fubao Sun, Inga J. Sauer, Johannes Koch, Inne Vanderkelen, Jonas Jägermeyr, Christoph Müller, Sam Rabin, Jochen Klar, Iliusi D. Vega del Valle, Gitta Lasslop, Sarah Chadburn, Eleanor Burke, Angela Gallego-Sala, Noah Smith, Jinfeng Chang, Stijn Hantson, Chantelle Burton, Anne Gädeke, Fang Li, Simon N. Gosling, Hannes Müller Schmied, Fred Hattermann, Jida Wang, Fangfang Yao, Thomas Hickler, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Wim Thiery, Daniel Mercado-Bettín, Robert Ladwig, Ana Isabel Ayala-Zamora, Matthew Forrest, and Michel Bechtold
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Our paper provides an overview of all observational climate-related and socioeconomic forcing data used as input for the impact model evaluation and impact attribution experiments within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project. The experiments are designed to test our understanding of observed changes in natural and human systems and to quantify to what degree these changes have already been induced by climate change.
Lee de Mora, Ranjini Swaminathan, Richard P. Allan, Jerry C. Blackford, Douglas I. Kelley, Phil Harris, Chris D. Jones, Colin G. Jones, Spencer Liddicoat, Robert J. Parker, Tristan Quaife, Jeremy Walton, and Andrew Yool
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1295–1315, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1295-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1295-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We investigate the flux of carbon from the atmosphere into the land surface and ocean for multiple models and over a range of future scenarios. We did this by comparing simulations after the same change in the global-mean near-surface temperature. Using this method, we show that the choice of scenario can impact the carbon allocation to the land, ocean, and atmosphere. Scenarios with higher emissions reach the same warming levels sooner, but also with relatively more carbon in the atmosphere.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Peter Landschützer, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Leticia Barbero, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Bertrand Decharme, Laurent Bopp, Ida Bagus Mandhara Brasika, Patricia Cadule, Matthew A. Chamberlain, Naveen Chandra, Thi-Tuyet-Trang Chau, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Xinyu Dou, Kazutaka Enyo, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Daniel J. Ford, Thomas Gasser, Josefine Ghattas, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Jens Heinke, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Andrew R. Jacobson, Atul Jain, Tereza Jarníková, Annika Jersild, Fei Jiang, Zhe Jin, Fortunat Joos, Etsushi Kato, Ralph F. Keeling, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Arne Körtzinger, Xin Lan, Nathalie Lefèvre, Hongmei Li, Junjie Liu, Zhiqiang Liu, Lei Ma, Greg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Patrick C. McGuire, Galen A. McKinley, Gesa Meyer, Eric J. Morgan, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin M. O'Brien, Are Olsen, Abdirahman M. Omar, Tsuneo Ono, Melf Paulsen, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Carter M. Powis, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, T. Luke Smallman, Stephen M. Smith, Reinel Sospedra-Alfonso, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Erik van Ooijen, Rik Wanninkhof, Michio Watanabe, Cathy Wimart-Rousseau, Dongxu Yang, Xiaojuan Yang, Wenping Yuan, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5301–5369, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5301-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2023 describes the methodology, main results, and data sets used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land ecosystems, and the ocean over the historical period (1750–2023). These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Yang Chen, Joanne Hall, Dave van Wees, Niels Andela, Stijn Hantson, Louis Giglio, Guido R. van der Werf, Douglas C. Morton, and James T. Randerson
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5227–5259, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5227-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5227-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Using multiple sets of remotely sensed data, we created a dataset of monthly global burned area from 1997 to 2020. The estimated annual global burned area is 774 million hectares, significantly higher than previous estimates. Burned area declined by 1.21% per year due to extensive fire loss in savanna, grassland, and cropland ecosystems. This study enhances our understanding of the impact of fire on the carbon cycle and climate system, and may improve the predictions of future fire changes.
Roland Vernooij, Tom Eames, Jeremy Russell-Smith, Cameron Yates, Robin Beatty, Jay Evans, Andrew Edwards, Natasha Ribeiro, Martin Wooster, Tercia Strydom, Marcos Vinicius Giongo, Marco Assis Borges, Máximo Menezes Costa, Ana Carolina Sena Barradas, Dave van Wees, and Guido R. Van der Werf
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1039–1064, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1039-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1039-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Savannas account for over half of global landscape fire emissions. Although environmental and fuel conditions affect the ratio of species the fire emits, these dynamics have not been implemented in global models. We measured CO2, CO, CH4, and N2O emission factors (EFs), fuel parameters, and fire severity proxies during 129 individual fires. We identified EF patterns and trained models to estimate EFs of these species based on satellite observations, reducing the estimation error by 60–85 %.
Matthew J. McGrath, Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Philippe Peylin, Robbie M. Andrew, Bradley Matthews, Frank Dentener, Juraj Balkovič, Vladislav Bastrikov, Meike Becker, Gregoire Broquet, Philippe Ciais, Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, Raphael Ganzenmüller, Giacomo Grassi, Ian Harris, Matthew Jones, Jürgen Knauer, Matthias Kuhnert, Guillaume Monteil, Saqr Munassar, Paul I. Palmer, Glen P. Peters, Chunjing Qiu, Mart-Jan Schelhaas, Oksana Tarasova, Matteo Vizzarri, Karina Winkler, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Antoine Berchet, Peter Briggs, Patrick Brockmann, Frédéric Chevallier, Giulia Conchedda, Monica Crippa, Stijn N. C. Dellaert, Hugo A. C. Denier van der Gon, Sara Filipek, Pierre Friedlingstein, Richard Fuchs, Michael Gauss, Christoph Gerbig, Diego Guizzardi, Dirk Günther, Richard A. Houghton, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Ronny Lauerwald, Bas Lerink, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Géraud Moulas, Marilena Muntean, Gert-Jan Nabuurs, Aurélie Paquirissamy, Lucia Perugini, Wouter Peters, Roberto Pilli, Julia Pongratz, Pierre Regnier, Marko Scholze, Yusuf Serengil, Pete Smith, Efisio Solazzo, Rona L. Thompson, Francesco N. Tubiello, Timo Vesala, and Sophia Walther
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 4295–4370, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-4295-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate estimation of fluxes of carbon dioxide from the land surface is essential for understanding future impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the climate system. A wide variety of methods currently exist to estimate these sources and sinks. We are continuing work to develop annual comparisons of these diverse methods in order to clarify what they all actually calculate and to resolve apparent disagreement, in addition to highlighting opportunities for increased understanding.
Sebastien Garrigues, Melanie Ades, Samuel Remy, Johannes Flemming, Zak Kipling, Istvan Laszlo, Mark Parrington, Antje Inness, Roberto Ribas, Luke Jones, Richard Engelen, and Vincent-Henri Peuch
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 10473–10487, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10473-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10473-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) provides global monitoring of aerosols using the ECMWF forecast model constrained by the assimilation of satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD). This work aims at evaluating the assimilation of the NOAA VIIRS AOD product in the ECMWF model. It shows that the introduction of VIIRS in the CAMS data assimilation system enhances the accuracy of the aerosol analysis, particularly over Europe and desert and maritime sites.
Lilian Vallet, Martin Schwartz, Philippe Ciais, Dave van Wees, Aurelien de Truchis, and Florent Mouillot
Biogeosciences, 20, 3803–3825, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3803-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-3803-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study analyzes the ecological impact of the 2022 summer fire season in France by using high-resolution satellite data. The total biomass loss was 2.553 Mt, equivalent to a 17 % increase of the average natural mortality of all French forests. While Mediterranean forests had a lower biomass loss, there was a drastic increase in burned area and biomass loss over the Atlantic pine forests and temperate forests. This result revisits the distinctiveness of the 2022 fire season.
Joao Carlos Martins Teixeira, Chantelle Burton, Douglas I. Kelly, Gerd A. Folberth, Fiona M. O'Connor, Richard A. Betts, and Apostolos Voulgarakis
Biogeosciences Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2023-136, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2023-136, 2023
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
Representing socio-economic impacts on fires is crucial to underpin the confidence in global fire models. Introducing these into INFERNO, reduces biases and improves the modelled burnt area (BA) trends when compared to observations. Including socio-economic factors in the representation of fires in Earth System Models is important for realistically simulating BA, quantifying trends in the recent past, and for understanding the main drivers of those at regional scales.
Akli Benali, Nuno Guiomar, Hugo Gonçalves, Bernardo Mota, Fábio Silva, Paulo M. Fernandes, Carlos Mota, Alexandre Penha, João Santos, José M. C. Pereira, and Ana C. L. Sá
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 3791–3818, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3791-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3791-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We reconstructed the spread of 80 large wildfires that burned recently in Portugal and calculated metrics that describe how wildfires behave, such as rate of spread, growth rate, and energy released. We describe the fire behaviour distribution using six percentile intervals that can be easily communicated to both research and management communities. The database will help improve our current knowledge on wildfire behaviour and support better decision making.
Camilla Mathison, Eleanor Burke, Andrew J. Hartley, Douglas I. Kelley, Chantelle Burton, Eddy Robertson, Nicola Gedney, Karina Williams, Andy Wiltshire, Richard J. Ellis, Alistair A. Sellar, and Chris D. Jones
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4249–4264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4249-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4249-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes and evaluates a new modelling methodology to quantify the impacts of climate change on water, biomes and the carbon cycle. We have created a new configuration and set-up for the JULES-ES land surface model, driven by bias-corrected historical and future climate model output provided by the Inter-Sectoral Impacts Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP). This allows us to compare projections of the impacts of climate change across multiple impact models and multiple sectors.
Stefano Potter, Sol Cooperdock, Sander Veraverbeke, Xanthe Walker, Michelle C. Mack, Scott J. Goetz, Jennifer Baltzer, Laura Bourgeau-Chavez, Arden Burrell, Catherine Dieleman, Nancy French, Stijn Hantson, Elizabeth E. Hoy, Liza Jenkins, Jill F. Johnstone, Evan S. Kane, Susan M. Natali, James T. Randerson, Merritt R. Turetsky, Ellen Whitman, Elizabeth Wiggins, and Brendan M. Rogers
Biogeosciences, 20, 2785–2804, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2785-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2785-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Here we developed a new burned-area detection algorithm between 2001–2019 across Alaska and Canada at 500 m resolution. We estimate 2.37 Mha burned annually between 2001–2019 over the domain, emitting 79.3 Tg C per year, with a mean combustion rate of 3.13 kg C m−2. We found larger-fire years were generally associated with greater mean combustion. The burned-area and combustion datasets described here can be used for local- to continental-scale applications of boreal fire science.
Carolina Gallo, Jonathan M. Eden, Bastien Dieppois, Igor Drobyshev, Peter Z. Fulé, Jesús San-Miguel-Ayanz, and Matthew Blackett
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3103–3122, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3103-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3103-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study conducts the first global evaluation of the latest generation of global climate models to simulate a set of fire weather indicators from the Canadian Fire Weather Index System. Models are shown to perform relatively strongly at the global scale, but they show substantial regional and seasonal differences. The results demonstrate the value of model evaluation and selection in producing reliable fire danger projections, ultimately to support decision-making and forest management.
Kandice L. Harper, Céline Lamarche, Andrew Hartley, Philippe Peylin, Catherine Ottlé, Vladislav Bastrikov, Rodrigo San Martín, Sylvia I. Bohnenstengel, Grit Kirches, Martin Boettcher, Roman Shevchuk, Carsten Brockmann, and Pierre Defourny
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1465–1499, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1465-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1465-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We built a spatially explicit annual plant-functional-type (PFT) dataset for 1992–2020 exhibiting intra-class spatial variability in PFT fractional cover at 300 m. For each year, 14 maps of percentage cover are produced: bare soil, water, permanent snow/ice, built, managed grasses, natural grasses, and trees and shrubs, each split into leaf type and seasonality. Model simulations indicate significant differences in simulated carbon, water, and energy fluxes in some regions using this new set.
Anna Agustí-Panareda, Jérôme Barré, Sébastien Massart, Antje Inness, Ilse Aben, Melanie Ades, Bianca C. Baier, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Tobias Borsdorff, Nicolas Bousserez, Souhail Boussetta, Michael Buchwitz, Luca Cantarello, Cyril Crevoisier, Richard Engelen, Henk Eskes, Johannes Flemming, Sébastien Garrigues, Otto Hasekamp, Vincent Huijnen, Luke Jones, Zak Kipling, Bavo Langerock, Joe McNorton, Nicolas Meilhac, Stefan Noël, Mark Parrington, Vincent-Henri Peuch, Michel Ramonet, Miha Razinger, Maximilian Reuter, Roberto Ribas, Martin Suttie, Colm Sweeney, Jérôme Tarniewicz, and Lianghai Wu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 3829–3859, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3829-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3829-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a global dataset of atmospheric CO2 and CH4, the two most important human-made greenhouse gases, which covers almost 2 decades (2003–2020). It is produced by combining satellite data of CO2 and CH4 with a weather and air composition prediction model, and it has been carefully evaluated against independent observations to ensure validity and point out deficiencies to the user. This dataset can be used for scientific studies in the field of climate change and the global carbon cycle.
Elena Aragoneses, Mariano García, Michele Salis, Luís M. Ribeiro, and Emilio Chuvieco
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1287–1315, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1287-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1287-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We present a new hierarchical fuel classification system with a total of 85 fuels that is useful for preventing fire risk at different spatial scales. Based on this, we developed a European fuel map (1 km resolution) using land cover datasets, biogeographic datasets, and bioclimatic modelling. We validated the map by comparing it to high-resolution data, obtaining high overall accuracy. Finally, we developed a crosswalk for standard fuel models as a first assignment of fuel parameters.
Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Chunjing Qiu, Matthew J. McGrath, Philippe Peylin, Glen P. Peters, Philippe Ciais, Rona L. Thompson, Aki Tsuruta, Dominik Brunner, Matthias Kuhnert, Bradley Matthews, Paul I. Palmer, Oksana Tarasova, Pierre Regnier, Ronny Lauerwald, David Bastviken, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, Wilfried Winiwarter, Giuseppe Etiope, Tuula Aalto, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Vladislav Bastrikov, Antoine Berchet, Patrick Brockmann, Giancarlo Ciotoli, Giulia Conchedda, Monica Crippa, Frank Dentener, Christine D. Groot Zwaaftink, Diego Guizzardi, Dirk Günther, Jean-Matthieu Haussaire, Sander Houweling, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Massaer Kouyate, Adrian Leip, Antti Leppänen, Emanuele Lugato, Manon Maisonnier, Alistair J. Manning, Tiina Markkanen, Joe McNorton, Marilena Muntean, Gabriel D. Oreggioni, Prabir K. Patra, Lucia Perugini, Isabelle Pison, Maarit T. Raivonen, Marielle Saunois, Arjo J. Segers, Pete Smith, Efisio Solazzo, Hanqin Tian, Francesco N. Tubiello, Timo Vesala, Guido R. van der Werf, Chris Wilson, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1197–1268, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study updates the state-of-the-art scientific overview of CH4 and N2O emissions in the EU27 and UK in Petrescu et al. (2021a). Yearly updates are needed to improve the different respective approaches and to inform on the development of formal verification systems. It integrates the most recent emission inventories, process-based model and regional/global inversions, comparing them with UNFCCC national GHG inventories, in support to policy to facilitate real-time verification procedures.
Jane P. Mulcahy, Colin G. Jones, Steven T. Rumbold, Till Kuhlbrodt, Andrea J. Dittus, Edward W. Blockley, Andrew Yool, Jeremy Walton, Catherine Hardacre, Timothy Andrews, Alejandro Bodas-Salcedo, Marc Stringer, Lee de Mora, Phil Harris, Richard Hill, Doug Kelley, Eddy Robertson, and Yongming Tang
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 1569–1600, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1569-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-1569-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Recent global climate models simulate historical global mean surface temperatures which are too cold, possibly to due to excessive aerosol cooling. This raises questions about the models' ability to simulate important climate processes and reduces confidence in future climate predictions. We present a new version of the UK Earth System Model, which has an improved aerosols simulation and a historical temperature record. Interestingly, the long-term response to CO2 remains largely unchanged.
Jose V. Moris, Pedro Álvarez-Álvarez, Marco Conedera, Annalie Dorph, Thomas D. Hessilt, Hugh G. P. Hunt, Renata Libonati, Lucas S. Menezes, Mortimer M. Müller, Francisco J. Pérez-Invernón, Gianni B. Pezzatti, Nicolau Pineda, Rebecca C. Scholten, Sander Veraverbeke, B. Mike Wotton, and Davide Ascoli
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 1151–1163, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1151-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1151-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This work describes a database on holdover times of lightning-ignited wildfires (LIWs). Holdover time is defined as the time between lightning-induced fire ignition and fire detection. The database contains 42 datasets built with data on more than 152 375 LIWs from 13 countries in five continents from 1921 to 2020. This database is the first freely-available, harmonized and ready-to-use global source of holdover time data, which may be used to investigate LIWs and model the holdover phenomenon.
Peng Wang, Ruhan Zhang, Shida Sun, Meng Gao, Bo Zheng, Dan Zhang, Yanli Zhang, Gregory R. Carmichael, and Hongliang Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 2983–2996, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2983-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-2983-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In China, the number of vehicles has jumped significantly in the last decade. This caused severe traffic congestion and aggravated air pollution. In this study, we developed a new temporal allocation approach to quantify the impacts of traffic congestion. We found that traffic congestion worsens air quality and the health burden across China, especially in the urban clusters. More effective and comprehensive vehicle emission control policies should be implemented to improve air quality in China.
Yuanhong Zhao, Marielle Saunois, Philippe Bousquet, Xin Lin, Michaela I. Hegglin, Josep G. Canadell, Robert B. Jackson, and Bo Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 789–807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-789-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-789-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The large uncertainties in OH simulated by atmospheric chemistry models hinder accurate estimates of CH4 chemical loss through the bottom-up method. This study presents a new approach based on OH precursor observations and a chemical box model to improve the tropospheric OH distributions simulated by atmospheric chemistry models. Through this approach, both the global OH burden and the corresponding methane chemical loss reach consistency with the top-down method based on MCF inversions.
Robert J. Parker, Chris Wilson, Edward Comyn-Platt, Garry Hayman, Toby R. Marthews, A. Anthony Bloom, Mark F. Lunt, Nicola Gedney, Simon J. Dadson, Joe McNorton, Neil Humpage, Hartmut Boesch, Martyn P. Chipperfield, Paul I. Palmer, and Dai Yamazaki
Biogeosciences, 19, 5779–5805, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane, one of the most important climate gases. The JULES land surface model simulates these emissions. We use satellite data to evaluate how well JULES reproduces the methane seasonal cycle over different tropical wetlands. It performs well for most regions; however, it struggles for some African wetlands influenced heavily by river flooding. We explain the reasons for these deficiencies and highlight how future development will improve these areas.
Dave van Wees, Guido R. van der Werf, James T. Randerson, Brendan M. Rogers, Yang Chen, Sander Veraverbeke, Louis Giglio, and Douglas C. Morton
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8411–8437, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8411-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8411-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We present a global fire emission model based on the GFED model framework with a spatial resolution of 500 m. The higher resolution allowed for a more detailed representation of spatial heterogeneity in fuels and emissions. Specific modules were developed to model, for example, emissions from fire-related forest loss and belowground burning. Results from the 500 m model were compared to GFED4s, showing that global emissions were relatively similar but that spatial differences were substantial.
Sebastien Garrigues, Samuel Remy, Julien Chimot, Melanie Ades, Antje Inness, Johannes Flemming, Zak Kipling, Istvan Laszlo, Angela Benedetti, Roberto Ribas, Soheila Jafariserajehlou, Bertrand Fougnie, Shobha Kondragunta, Richard Engelen, Vincent-Henri Peuch, Mark Parrington, Nicolas Bousserez, Margarita Vazquez Navarro, and Anna Agusti-Panareda
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14657–14692, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14657-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14657-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) provides global monitoring of aerosols using the ECMWF forecast model constrained by the assimilation of satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD). This work aims at evaluating two new satellite AODs to enhance the CAMS aerosol global forecast. It highlights the spatial and temporal differences between the satellite AOD products at the model spatial resolution, which is essential information to design multi-satellite AOD data assimilation schemes.
Longlei Li, Natalie M. Mahowald, Jasper F. Kok, Xiaohong Liu, Mingxuan Wu, Danny M. Leung, Douglas S. Hamilton, Louisa K. Emmons, Yue Huang, Neil Sexton, Jun Meng, and Jessica Wan
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8181–8219, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8181-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8181-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study advances mineral dust parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model (CAM; version 6.1). Efforts include 1) incorporating a more physically based dust emission scheme; 2) updating the dry deposition scheme; and 3) revising the gravitational settling velocity to account for dust asphericity. Substantial improvements achieved with these updates can help accurately quantify dust–climate interactions using CAM, such as the dust-radiation and dust–cloud interactions.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Michael O'Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones, Robbie M. Andrew, Luke Gregor, Judith Hauck, Corinne Le Quéré, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Are Olsen, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Clemens Schwingshackl, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Robert B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Ramdane Alkama, Almut Arneth, Vivek K. Arora, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Henry C. Bittig, Laurent Bopp, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Wiley Evans, Stefanie Falk, Richard A. Feely, Thomas Gasser, Marion Gehlen, Thanos Gkritzalis, Lucas Gloege, Giacomo Grassi, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Matthew Hefner, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Atul K. Jain, Annika Jersild, Koji Kadono, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Peter Landschützer, Nathalie Lefèvre, Keith Lindsay, Junjie Liu, Zhu Liu, Gregg Marland, Nicolas Mayot, Matthew J. McGrath, Nicolas Metzl, Natalie M. Monacci, David R. Munro, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Kevin O'Brien, Tsuneo Ono, Paul I. Palmer, Naiqing Pan, Denis Pierrot, Katie Pocock, Benjamin Poulter, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Carmen Rodriguez, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Roland Séférian, Jamie D. Shutler, Ingunn Skjelvan, Tobias Steinhoff, Qing Sun, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Shintaro Takao, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Xiangjun Tian, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Hiroyuki Tsujino, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Anthony P. Walker, Rik Wanninkhof, Chris Whitehead, Anna Willstrand Wranne, Rebecca Wright, Wenping Yuan, Chao Yue, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, Jiye Zeng, and Bo Zheng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4811–4900, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2022 describes the datasets and methodology used to quantify the anthropogenic emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) and their partitioning among the atmosphere, the land ecosystems, and the ocean. These living datasets are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Antje Inness, Ilse Aben, Melanie Ades, Tobias Borsdorff, Johannes Flemming, Luke Jones, Jochen Landgraf, Bavo Langerock, Philippe Nedelec, Mark Parrington, and Roberto Ribas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14355–14376, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14355-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14355-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) provides daily global air quality forecasts to users worldwide. One of the species of interest is carbon monoxide (CO), an important trace gas in the atmosphere with anthropogenic and natural sources, produced by incomplete combustion, for example, by wildfires. This paper looks at how well CAMS can model CO in the atmosphere and shows that the fields can be improved when blending CO data from the TROPOMI instrument with the CAMS model.
Clement Jean Frédéric Delcourt and Sander Veraverbeke
Biogeosciences, 19, 4499–4520, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4499-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4499-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study provides new equations that can be used to estimate aboveground tree biomass in larch-dominated forests of northeast Siberia. Applying these equations to 53 forest stands in the Republic of Sakha (Russia) resulted in significantly larger biomass stocks than when using existing equations. The data presented in this work can help refine biomass estimates in Siberian boreal forests. This is essential to assess changes in boreal vegetation and carbon dynamics.
Fátima Arrogante-Funes, Inmaculada Aguado, and Emilio Chuvieco
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2981–3003, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2981-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2981-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We show that ecological value might be reduced by 50 % due to fire perturbation in ecosystems that have not developed in the presence of fire and/or that present changes in the fire regime. The biomes most affected are tropical and subtropical forests, tundra, and mangroves. Integration of biotic and abiotic fire regime and regeneration factors resulted in a powerful way to map ecological vulnerability to fire and develop assessments to generate adaptation plans of management in forest masses.
Qirui Zhong, Nick Schutgens, Guido van der Werf, Twan van Noije, Kostas Tsigaridis, Susanne E. Bauer, Tero Mielonen, Alf Kirkevåg, Øyvind Seland, Harri Kokkola, Ramiro Checa-Garcia, David Neubauer, Zak Kipling, Hitoshi Matsui, Paul Ginoux, Toshihiko Takemura, Philippe Le Sager, Samuel Rémy, Huisheng Bian, Mian Chin, Kai Zhang, Jialei Zhu, Svetlana G. Tsyro, Gabriele Curci, Anna Protonotariou, Ben Johnson, Joyce E. Penner, Nicolas Bellouin, Ragnhild B. Skeie, and Gunnar Myhre
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11009–11032, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Aerosol optical depth (AOD) errors for biomass burning aerosol (BBA) are evaluated in 18 global models against satellite datasets. Notwithstanding biases in satellite products, they allow model evaluations. We observe large and diverse model biases due to errors in BBA. Further interpretations of AOD diversities suggest large biases exist in key processes for BBA which require better constraining. These results can contribute to further model improvement and development.
Yawen Kong, Bo Zheng, Qiang Zhang, and Kebin He
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10769–10788, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10769-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10769-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a Bayesian atmospheric inversion system based on the 4D local ensemble transform Kalman filter (4D-LETKF) algorithm coupled with GEOS-Chem from the latest Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) V10r XCO2 retrievals. This is the first adaptation of 4D-LETKF to an OCO-2-based global carbon inversion system. We inferred global gridded carbon fluxes and investigated their magnitudes, variations, and partitioning schemes to understand the global and regional carbon budgets for 2015–2020.
Amar Halifa-Marín, Miguel A. Torres-Vázquez, Enrique Pravia-Sarabia, Marc Lemus-Canovas, Pedro Jiménez-Guerrero, and Juan Pedro Montávez
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4251–4263, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4251-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-4251-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Near-natural Iberian water resources have suddenly decreased since the 1980s. These declines have been promoted by the weakening (enhancement) of wintertime precipitation (the NAOi) in the most humid areas, whereas afforestation and drought intensification have played a crucial role in semi-arid areas. Future water management would benefit from greater knowledge of North Atlantic climate variability and reforestation/afforestation processes in semi-arid catchments.
Roland Vernooij, Patrik Winiger, Martin Wooster, Tercia Strydom, Laurent Poulain, Ulrike Dusek, Mark Grosvenor, Gareth J. Roberts, Nick Schutgens, and Guido R. van der Werf
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4271–4294, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4271-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4271-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Landscape fires are a substantial emitter of greenhouse gases and aerosols. Previous studies have indicated savanna emission factors to be highly variable. Improving fire emission estimates, and understanding future climate- and human-induced changes in fire regimes, requires in situ measurements. We present a drone-based method that enables the collection of a large amount of high-quality emission factor measurements that do not have the biases of aircraft or surface measurements.
Abby C. Lute, John Abatzoglou, and Timothy Link
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5045–5071, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5045-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5045-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We developed a snow model that can be used to quantify snowpack over large areas with a high degree of spatial detail. We ran the model over the western United States, creating a snow and climate dataset for three time periods. Compared to observations of snowpack, the model captured the key aspects of snow across time and space. The model and dataset will be useful in understanding historical and future changes in snowpack, with relevance to water resources, agriculture, and ecosystems.
Joe McNorton, Nicolas Bousserez, Anna Agustí-Panareda, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Luca Cantarello, Richard Engelen, Vincent Huijnen, Antje Inness, Zak Kipling, Mark Parrington, and Roberto Ribas
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 5961–5981, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5961-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5961-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Concentrations of atmospheric methane continue to grow, in recent years at an increasing rate, for unknown reasons. Using newly available satellite observations and a state-of-the-art weather prediction model we perform global estimates of emissions from hotspots at high resolution. Results show that the system can accurately report on biases in national inventories and is used to conclude that the early COVID-19 slowdown period (March–June 2020) had little impact on global methane emissions.
Pierre Friedlingstein, Matthew W. Jones, Michael O'Sullivan, Robbie M. Andrew, Dorothee C. E. Bakker, Judith Hauck, Corinne Le Quéré, Glen P. Peters, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Stephen Sitch, Josep G. Canadell, Philippe Ciais, Rob B. Jackson, Simone R. Alin, Peter Anthoni, Nicholas R. Bates, Meike Becker, Nicolas Bellouin, Laurent Bopp, Thi Tuyet Trang Chau, Frédéric Chevallier, Louise P. Chini, Margot Cronin, Kim I. Currie, Bertrand Decharme, Laique M. Djeutchouang, Xinyu Dou, Wiley Evans, Richard A. Feely, Liang Feng, Thomas Gasser, Dennis Gilfillan, Thanos Gkritzalis, Giacomo Grassi, Luke Gregor, Nicolas Gruber, Özgür Gürses, Ian Harris, Richard A. Houghton, George C. Hurtt, Yosuke Iida, Tatiana Ilyina, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Atul Jain, Steve D. Jones, Etsushi Kato, Daniel Kennedy, Kees Klein Goldewijk, Jürgen Knauer, Jan Ivar Korsbakken, Arne Körtzinger, Peter Landschützer, Siv K. Lauvset, Nathalie Lefèvre, Sebastian Lienert, Junjie Liu, Gregg Marland, Patrick C. McGuire, Joe R. Melton, David R. Munro, Julia E. M. S. Nabel, Shin-Ichiro Nakaoka, Yosuke Niwa, Tsuneo Ono, Denis Pierrot, Benjamin Poulter, Gregor Rehder, Laure Resplandy, Eddy Robertson, Christian Rödenbeck, Thais M. Rosan, Jörg Schwinger, Clemens Schwingshackl, Roland Séférian, Adrienne J. Sutton, Colm Sweeney, Toste Tanhua, Pieter P. Tans, Hanqin Tian, Bronte Tilbrook, Francesco Tubiello, Guido R. van der Werf, Nicolas Vuichard, Chisato Wada, Rik Wanninkhof, Andrew J. Watson, David Willis, Andrew J. Wiltshire, Wenping Yuan, Chao Yue, Xu Yue, Sönke Zaehle, and Jiye Zeng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 1917–2005, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-1917-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Global Carbon Budget 2021 describes the data sets and methodology used to quantify the emissions of carbon dioxide and their partitioning among the atmosphere, land, and ocean. These living data are updated every year to provide the highest transparency and traceability in the reporting of CO2, the key driver of climate change.
Rahayu Adzhar, Douglas I. Kelley, Ning Dong, Charles George, Mireia Torello Raventos, Elmar Veenendaal, Ted R. Feldpausch, Oliver L. Phillips, Simon L. Lewis, Bonaventure Sonké, Herman Taedoumg, Beatriz Schwantes Marimon, Tomas Domingues, Luzmila Arroyo, Gloria Djagbletey, Gustavo Saiz, and France Gerard
Biogeosciences, 19, 1377–1394, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1377-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-1377-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields (VCF) product underestimates tree cover compared to field data and could be underestimating tree cover significantly across the tropics. VCF is used to represent land cover or validate model performance in many land surface and global vegetation models and to train finer-scaled Earth observation products. Because underestimation in VCF may render it unsuitable for training data and bias model predictions, it should be calibrated before use in the tropics.
Roland Vernooij, Ulrike Dusek, Maria Elena Popa, Peng Yao, Anupam Shaikat, Chenxi Qiu, Patrik Winiger, Carina van der Veen, Thomas Callum Eames, Natasha Ribeiro, and Guido R. van der Werf
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2871–2890, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2871-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2871-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Landscape fires are a major source of greenhouse gases and aerosols, particularly in sub-tropical savannas. Stable carbon isotopes in emissions can be used to trace the contribution of C3 plants (e.g. trees or shrubs) and C4 plants (e.g. savanna grasses) to greenhouse gases and aerosols if the process is well understood. This helps us to link individual vegetation types to emissions, identify biomass burning emissions in the atmosphere, and improve the reconstruction of historic fire regimes.
Philippe Ciais, Ana Bastos, Frédéric Chevallier, Ronny Lauerwald, Ben Poulter, Josep G. Canadell, Gustaf Hugelius, Robert B. Jackson, Atul Jain, Matthew Jones, Masayuki Kondo, Ingrid T. Luijkx, Prabir K. Patra, Wouter Peters, Julia Pongratz, Ana Maria Roxana Petrescu, Shilong Piao, Chunjing Qiu, Celso Von Randow, Pierre Regnier, Marielle Saunois, Robert Scholes, Anatoly Shvidenko, Hanqin Tian, Hui Yang, Xuhui Wang, and Bo Zheng
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1289–1316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1289-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1289-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The second phase of the Regional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes (RECCAP) will provide updated quantification and process understanding of CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions and sinks for ten regions of the globe. In this paper, we give definitions, review different methods, and make recommendations for estimating different components of the total land–atmosphere carbon exchange for each region in a consistent and complete approach.
Youwen Sun, Hao Yin, Xiao Lu, Justus Notholt, Mathias Palm, Cheng Liu, Yuan Tian, and Bo Zheng
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18589–18608, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18589-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18589-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses high-resolution nested-grid GEOS-Chem simulation, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) machine learning method, and the exposure–response relationship to determine the drivers and evaluate the health risks of the unexpected surface O3 enhancements over the Sichuan Basin in 2020. These unexpected O3 enhancements were induced by meteorological anomalies and caused dramatically high health risks.
Margarita Choulga, Greet Janssens-Maenhout, Ingrid Super, Efisio Solazzo, Anna Agusti-Panareda, Gianpaolo Balsamo, Nicolas Bousserez, Monica Crippa, Hugo Denier van der Gon, Richard Engelen, Diego Guizzardi, Jeroen Kuenen, Joe McNorton, Gabriel Oreggioni, and Antoon Visschedijk
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 5311–5335, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5311-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5311-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
People worry that growing man-made carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations lead to climate change. Global models, use of observations, and datasets can help us better understand behaviour of CO2. Here a tool to compute uncertainty in man-made CO2 sources per country per year and month is presented. An example of all sources separated into seven groups (intensive and average energy, industry, humans, ground and air transport, others) is presented. Results will be used to predict CO2 concentrations.
Cited articles
Abatzoglou, J. T., Rupp, D. E., O'Neill, L. W., and Sadegh, M.: Compound Extremes Drive the Western Oregon Wildfires of September 2020, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL092520, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL092520, 2021.
Abatzoglou, J. T., Kolden, C. A., Cullen, A. C., Sadegh, M., Williams, E. L., Turco, M., and Jones, M. W.: Climate change has increased the odds of extreme regional forest fire years globally, Nat. Commun., 16, 6390, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-61608-1, 2025.
Agência para a Gestão Integrada de Fogos Rurais: Relatório de Atividades do Sistema de Gestão Integrada de Fogos Rurais, Portugal, https://www.agif.pt/pt/relatorios-anuais (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
Andela, N. and Jones, M. W.: Update of: The Global Fire Atlas of individual fire size, duration, speed and direction, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17669692, 2026.
Andela, N., Jones, M. W., and van Wees, D.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Forest Carbon Project Exposure to Fire, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21430353, 2026.
Andela, N., Morton, D. C., Giglio, L., Chen, Y., van der Werf, G. R., Kasibhatla, P. S., DeFries, R. S., Collatz, G. J., Hantson, S., Kloster, S., Bachelet, D., Forrest, M., Lasslop, G., Li, F., Mangeon, S., Melton, J. R., Yue, C., and Randerson, J. T.: A human-driven decline in global burned area, Science, 356, 1356–1362, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4108, 2017.
Andela, N., Morton, D. C., Giglio, L., Paugam, R., Chen, Y., Hantson, S., van der Werf, G. R., and Randerson, J. T.: The Global Fire Atlas of individual fire size, duration, speed and direction, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 11, 529–552, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-529-2019, 2019.
Anderson, L. O., Di Bella, C. M., Selaya, G., Bilbao, B. A., de la Barrera, F., Segura-Garcia, C., and Silva-Junior, C. H. L.: State of Wildfires in South America 2025–2026, SSRN [preprint], https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7037658, 2026.
ArcGIS Hub: World Continents, ArcGIS Hub, [data set], https://hub. arcgis.com/maps/CESJ::world-continents (last access: 22 July 2026), 2024.
Aznar-Siguan, G. and Bresch, D. N.: CLIMADA v1: a global weather and climate risk assessment platform, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3085–3097, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3085-2019, 2019.
Baltzer, J. L., Day, N. J., Walker, X. J., Greene, D., Mack, M. C., Alexander, H. D., Arseneault, D., Barnes, J., Bergeron, Y., Boucher, Y., Bourgeau-Chavez, L., Brown, C. D., Carrière, S., Howard, B. K., Gauthier, S., Parisien, M.-A., Reid, K. A., Rogers, B. M., Roland, C., Sirois, L., Stehn, S., Thompson, D. K., Turetsky, M. R., Veraverbeke, S., Whitman, E., Yang, J., and Johnstone, J. F.: Increasing fire and the decline of fire adapted black spruce in the boreal forest, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2024872118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024872118, 2021.
Barbosa, M. L. F., Kelley, D. I., Burton, C. A., Ferreira, I. J. M., da Veiga, R. M., Bradley, A., Molin, P. G., and Anderson, L. O.: FLAME 1.0: a novel approach for modelling burned area in the Brazilian biomes using the maximum entropy concept, Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 3533–3557, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-3533-2025, 2025.
Barnes, C., Keeping, T., Rivera, J. A., Pessacg, N. L., Garreaud, R., Zachariah, M., Clarke, B., Corradi, M. R., Kadhasanoglu, A., Mejía, A., Santos-Vega, M., Vahlberg, M., Ganguly, S., Bazo, J., and Otto, F.: Climate change fuels the destruction of world's oldest trees, https://doi.org/10.25560/127727, 2026.
Bayar, A. S., Pinto, J. G., Gouveia, C. M., and Ramos, A. M.: Strong intensification of extreme fire weather in Europe under 3 °C compared to 2 °C global warming, Earth Syst. Dynam., 17, 929–954, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-17-929-2026, 2026.
Bilbao, B. A., Ferrero, B. G., Falleiro, R. M., Moura, L. C., and Fagundes, G. M.: Traditional Fire Uses by Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities in South America, in: Fire in the South American Ecosystems, edited by: Fidelis, A. and Pivello, V. R., Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 39–81, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-89372-8_3, 2025.
Binte Shahid, S., Lacey, F. G., Wiedinmyer, C., Yokelson, R. J., and Barsanti, K. C.: NEIVAv1.0: Next-generation Emissions InVentory expansion of Akagi et al. (2011) version 1.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7679–7711, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7679-2024, 2024.
Boschetti, L. and Roy, D. P.: Defining a fire year for reporting and analysis of global interannual fire variability, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 113, G03020, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JG000686, 2008.
Bowman, D. M. J. S., Balch, J. K., Artaxo, P., Bond, W. J., Carlson, J. M., Cochrane, M. A., D'Antonio, C. M., DeFries, R. S., Doyle, J. C., Harrison, S. P., Johnston, F. H., Keeley, J. E., Krawchuk, M. A., Kull, C. A., Marston, J. B., Moritz, M. A., Prentice, I. C., Roos, C. I., Scott, A. C., Swetnam, T. W., van der Werf, G. R., and Pyne, S. J.: Fire in the Earth System, Science, 324, 481–484, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163886, 2009.
Bowman, D. M. J. S., Kolden, C. A., Abatzoglou, J. T., Johnston, F. H., van der Werf, G. R., and Flannigan, M.: Vegetation fires in the Anthropocene, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 500–515, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0085-3, 2020.
Brando, P. M., Barlow, J., Macedo, M. N., Silvério, D. V., Ferreira, J. N., Maracahipes, L., Anderson, L., Morton, D. C., Alencar, A., Paolucci, L. N., Jacobs, S., Stouter, H., Randerson, J., Flores, B. M., Starinchak, B., Coe, M., Pires, M. M., Rattis, L., Armenteras, D., Artaxo, P., Ordway, E. M., Trumbore, S., Staver, C., Berenguer, E., Menor, I. O., Maracahipes-Santos, L., Potter, N., Spracklen, D. V., and Uribe, M.: Tipping Points of Amazonian Forests: Beyond Myths and Toward Solutions, Annu. Rev. Environ. Res., 50, 97–131, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-111522-112804, 2025.
Burton, C., Lampe, S., Kelley, D. I., Thiery, W., Hantson, S., Christidis, N., Gudmundsson, L., Forrest, M., Burke, E., Chang, J., Huang, H., Ito, A., Kou-Giesbrecht, S., Lasslop, G., Li, W., Nieradzik, L., Li, F., Chen, Y., Randerson, J., Reyer, C. P. O., and Mengel, M.: Global burned area increasingly explained by climate change, Nat. Clim. Change, 14, 1186–1192, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02140-w, 2024a.
Burton, C., Kelley, D. I., Burke, E., Mathison, C., Jones, C. D., Betts, R. A., Robertson, E., Teixeira, J. C. M., Cardoso, M., and Anderson, L. O.: Fire weakens land carbon sinks before 1.5 °C, Nat. Geosci., 17, 1108–1114, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01554-7, 2024b.
C3S/ECMWF and WMO: C3S-WMO European State of the Climate 2025, https://doi.org/10.24381/zy93-sb27, 2026.
Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre: National Fire Situation Report For: 30 September 2025, https://ciffc.net/situation/2025-09-30 (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters: EM-DAT International Disaster Database, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters [data set], https://www.emdat.be/ (last access: 13 October 2026), 2026.
Chen, Y., Morton, D. C., Andela, N., van der Werf, G. R., Giglio, L., and Randerson, J. T.: A pan-tropical cascade of fire driven by El Niño/Southern Oscillation, Nat. Clim. Change, 7, 906–911, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-017-0014-8, 2017.
Chen, Y., Hall, J., van Wees, D., Andela, N., Hantson, S., Giglio, L., van der Werf, G. R., Morton, D. C., and Randerson, J. T.: Multi-decadal trends and variability in burned area from the fifth version of the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED5), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 5227–5259, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-5227-2023, 2023.
Chen, Y., Field, R. D., Scholten, R. C., and Randerson, J. T.: Persistent 2023–2025 Wildfire Extremes in Canada Produced Unprecedented Emissions and Air-Quality Impacts, Glob. Change Biol., 32, e70891, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70891, 2026a.
Chen, Y., van der Werf, G. R., Mu, M., van Wees, D., Hall, J. V., Giglio, L., Vernooij, R., Morton, D. C., Xu, L., Liu, T., Scholten, R. C., Coffield, S. R., Follette-Cook, M. B., Ott, L., and Randerson, J. T.: Tracking recent extremes and interannual variability of global fire emissions using a near-real-time extension to the Global Fire Emissions Database, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 18, 7535–7555, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-7535-2026, 2026b.
Chuvieco, E., Roteta, E., Sali, M., Stroppiana, D., Boettcher, M., Kirches, G., Storm, T., Khairoun, A., Pettinari, M. L., Franquesa, M., and Albergel, C.: Building a small fire database for Sub-Saharan Africa from Sentinel-2 high-resolution images, Sci. Total Environ., 845, 157139, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157139, 2022.
Ciais, P., Bastos, A., Chevallier, F., Lauerwald, R., Poulter, B., Canadell, J. G., Hugelius, G., Jackson, R. B., Jain, A., Jones, M., Kondo, M., Luijkx, I. T., Patra, P. K., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Petrescu, A. M. R., Piao, S., Qiu, C., Von Randow, C., Regnier, P., Saunois, M., Scholes, R., Shvidenko, A., Tian, H., Yang, H., Wang, X., and Zheng, B.: Definitions and methods to estimate regional land carbon fluxes for the second phase of the REgional Carbon Cycle Assessment and Processes Project (RECCAP-2), Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 1289–1316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-1289-2022, 2022.
Ciavarella, A., Christidis, N., Andrews, M., Groenendijk, M., Rostron, J., Elkington, M., Burke, C., Lott, F. C., and Stott, P. A.: Upgrade of the HadGEM3-A based attribution system to high resolution and a new validation framework for probabilistic event attribution, Weather Climate Extremes, 20, 9–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2018.03.003, 2018.
Comissão Técnica Independente: Comissão Técnica Independente para avaliação dos incêndios de agosto de 2025 em território de Portugal continental, https://www.parlamento.pt/Parlamento/Paginas/CTI.aspx (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
Copernicus: 2025 sees intense wildfire year in the Northern Hemisphere, https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/2025-sees-intense-wildfire-year-northern-hemisphere (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS): CAMS global biomass burning emissions based on fire radiative power (GFAS), C3S CDS [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/a05253c7, 2022.
Copernicus Climate Change Service: ERA5-Land hourly data from 1950 to present, C3S CDS [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/CDS.E2161BAC, 2019.
CTV News: “State of shock”: Dock burned in Sask. wildfires show ferocity of flames, https://www.ctvnews.ca/saskatoon/article/a-moccasin-is-not-just-a-slipper-sask-wildfire-destroys-historic-la-ronge-trading-post/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
Cunill Camprubí, À., Jones, M., and Resco de Dios, V.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Protected Areas Exposure to Fire, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20764120, 2026.
Cunningham, C. X., Williamson, G. J., and Bowman, D. M. J. S.: Increasing frequency and intensity of the most extreme wildfires on Earth, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02452-2, 2024.
Di Giuseppe, F. and Burton, C.: The Return of El Niño? What a Potential 2026 Event Could Mean for Wildfires Around the World, State of Wildfires Project, https://stateofwildfires.com/news/the-return-of-el-nino-what-a-potential-2026-event-could-mean-for-wildfires-around-the-world/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
DiMiceli, C., Carroll, M., Sohlberg, R., Kim, D.-H., Kelly, M., and Townshend, J.: MOD44B MODIS/Terra Vegetation Continuous Fields Yearly L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V006, NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD44B.006, 2015.
Dintwe, K., Elgamri A. I., M., Kouassi, J.-L., Amissah, L., Gilson, H., Muthiuru, A., N'Dri, B., Strydom, T., and Archibald, S.: State of Wildfires in Africa 2025–2026, SSRN [preprint], https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7033898, 1 June 2026.
Dirección General de Protección Civil y Emergencias: Informe anual de incendios forestales 2025, Ministerio dfel Interior, Gobierno de España, Spain, https://www.forestales.net/contenidos/informe-anual-de-incendios-forestales-2025 (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
Di Tomaso, E., Parrington, M., Di Giuseppe, F., Hamilton, D., Jones, M. W., Razinger, M., and Russo, E.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Daily mean PM2.5 surface concentrations aggregated by Continent, Biome, Country, and Administrative Region, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21277053, 2026.
Doxsey-Whitfield, E., MacManus, K., Adamo, S. B., Pistolesi, L., Squires, J., Borkovska, O., and Baptista, S. R.: Taking Advantage of the Improved Availability of Census Data: A First Look at the Gridded Population of the World, Version 4, Pap. Appl. Geogr., 1, 226–234, https://doi.org/10.1080/23754931.2015.1014272, 2015.
Eberenz, S., Stocker, D., Röösli, T., and Bresch, D. N.: Asset exposure data for global physical risk assessment, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 817–833, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-817-2020, 2020.
ECMWF: Observation and ERA5-Land derived 9 km global daily fire fuel characteristics since 2003, ECMWF Cross Data Store [data set], https://doi.org/10.24381/378D1497, 2025.
EU Eurostat: Countries – GISCO – Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata/administrative-units/countries (last access: 13 October 2026), 2020.
European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Operations (ECHO): Argentina – Wildfires, update (JRC GWIS, IFRC, media, Government of Chubut province) (ECHO Daily Flash of 13 January 2026), https://reliefweb.int/report/argentina/argentina-wildfires-update-jrc-gwis-ifrc-media-government-chubut-province-echo-daily-flash-13-january-2026 (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
European Forest Fire Information System: European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), https://forest-fire.emergency.copernicus.eu/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G. A., Senior, C. A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R. J., and Taylor, K. E.: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 1937–1958, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016, 2016.
FAO: Call to Action on Integrated Fire Management and Wildfire Resilience, GlobalFireManagement, https://www.fao.org/partnerships/fire-hub/about/call-to-action-on-integrated-fire-management-and-wildfire-resilience/en (last access: 13 October 2026), 2026a.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations): Global Fire Management Hub, GlobalFireManagement, https://www.fao.org/partnerships/fire-hub/en (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026b.
Fernandes, P. M., Santin, C., Ascoli, D., Doerr, S. H., Ruffault, J., Sjöström, J., and Xanthopoulos, G.: State of Wildfires in Europe 2025–2026, SSRN [preprint], https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6976539, 16 June 2026.
Freeborn, P. H., Wooster, M. J., Roy, D. P., and Cochrane, M. A.: Quantification of MODIS fire radiative power (FRP) measurement uncertainty for use in satellite-based active fire characterization and biomass burning estimation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1988–1994, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059086, 2014.
Frieler, K., Volkholz, J., Lange, S., Schewe, J., Mengel, M., del Rocío Rivas López, M., Otto, C., Reyer, C. P. O., Karger, D. N., Malle, J. T., Treu, S., Menz, C., Blanchard, J. L., Harrison, C. S., Petrik, C. M., Eddy, T. D., Ortega-Cisneros, K., Novaglio, C., Rousseau, Y., Watson, R. A., Stock, C., Liu, X., Heneghan, R., Tittensor, D., Maury, O., Büchner, M., Vogt, T., Wang, T., Sun, F., Sauer, I. J., Koch, J., Vanderkelen, I., Jägermeyr, J., Müller, C., Rabin, S., Klar, J., Vega del Valle, I. D., Lasslop, G., Chadburn, S., Burke, E., Gallego-Sala, A., Smith, N., Chang, J., Hantson, S., Burton, C., Gädeke, A., Li, F., Gosling, S. N., Müller Schmied, H., Hattermann, F., Wang, J., Yao, F., Hickler, T., Marcé, R., Pierson, D., Thiery, W., Mercado-Bettín, D., Ladwig, R., Ayala-Zamora, A. I., Forrest, M., and Bechtold, M.: Scenario setup and forcing data for impact model evaluation and impact attribution within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP3a), Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1–51, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1-2024, 2024.
Frieler, K., Lange, S., Schewe, J., Mengel, M., Treu, S., Otto, C., Volkholz, J., Reyer, C. P. O., Heinicke, S., Jones, C., Blanchard, J. L., Harrison, C. S., Petrik, C. M., Eddy, T. D., Ortega-Cisneros, K., Novaglio, C., Heneghan, R., Tittensor, D. P., Maury, O., Büchner, M., Vogt, T., Quesada-Chacón, D., Emanuel, K., Lee, C.-Y., Camargo, S. J., Hamester, L., Jägermeyr, J., Rabin, S., Klar, J., Vega del Valle, I. D., Novak, L., Sauer, I. J., Lasslop, G., Chadburn, S., Burke, E., Gallego-Sala, A., Smith, N., Chang, J., Hantson, S., Burton, C., Gädeke, A., Li, F., Gosling, S. N., Müller Schmied, H., Hattermann, F., Hickler, T., Marcé, R., Pierson, D., Thiery, W., Mercado-Bettín, D., Ladwig, R., Ayala, A. I., Forrest, M., Bechtold, M., Reinecke, R., de Graaf, I., Kaplan, J. O., Koch, A., Lengaigne, M., Kumar, R., and Strokal, M.: Scenario set-up and the new CMIP6-based climate-related forcings provided within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP3b, group I and II), Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 4095–4135, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-4095-2026, 2026.
Gallo, C., Eden, J. M., Dieppois, B., Drobyshev, I., Fulé, P. Z., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., and Blackett, M.: Evaluation of CMIP6 model performances in simulating fire weather spatiotemporal variability on global and regional scales, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3103–3122, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3103-2023, 2023.
Gallo, C., Dieppois, B., Quilcaille, Y., Chiriacò, M. V., Fulé, P. Z., Drobyshev, I., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Blackett, M., and Eden, J. M.: Future Impacts of Climate Change on Global Fire Weather: Insight from Weighted CMIP6 Multimodel Ensembles, J. Climate, 38, 6445–6462, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-24-0540.1, 2025.
Gauthier, E. and Bevacqua, E.: Human-induced climate change intensifies spatially compounding fire weather extremes across European countries, npj Nat. Hazards, 3, 39, https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-026-00201-y, 2026.
Ghasemiazma, F., Tonini, M., Fiorucci, P., and Turco, M.: Megafires in Mediterranean Europe: the compound role of fire weather and drought, npj Nat. Hazards, 3, 33, https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-026-00197-5, 2026.
Giglio, L.: VIIRS/NPP Burned Area Monthly L4 Global 500m SIN Grid V002, NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/VNP64A1.002, 2026.
Giglio, L., Randerson, J. T., and van der Werf, G. R.: Analysis of daily, monthly, and annual burned area using the fourth-generation global fire emissions database (GFED4), J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 118, 317–328, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrg.20042, 2013.
Giglio, L., Schroeder, W., and Justice, C. O.: The collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products, Remote Sens. Environ., 178, 31–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.054, 2016.
Giglio, L., Boschetti, L., Roy, D. P., Humber, M. L., and Justice, C. O.: The Collection 6 MODIS burned area mapping algorithm and product, Remote Sens. Environ., 217, 72–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.08.005, 2018.
Giglio, L., Boschetti, L., Roy, D. P., Hall, J. V., Zubkova, M., Humber, M., Huang, H., and Oles, V.: The NASA VIIRS burned area product, global validation, and intercomparison with the NASA MODIS burned area product, Remote Sens. Environ., 331, 115006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.115006, 2025.
Giglio, L., Justice, C., Boschetti, L., and Roy, D.: MODIS/Terra+Aqua Burned Area Monthly L3 Global 500m SIN Grid V061, NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MCD64A1.061, 2026.
Grau-Andrés, R., Moreira, B., and Pausas, J. G.: Global plant responses to intensified fire regimes, Global Ecolo. Biogeogr., 33, e13858, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13858, 2024.
Gu, Y., Fang, T., Yim, S. H.: Source emission contributions to particulate matter and ozone, and their health impacts in Southeast Asia, Environ. Int., 186, 108578, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2024.108578, 2024.
Haarsma, R. J., Roberts, M. J., Vidale, P. L., Senior, C. A., Bellucci, A., Bao, Q., Chang, P., Corti, S., Fučkar, N. S., Guemas, V., von Hardenberg, J., Hazeleger, W., Kodama, C., Koenigk, T., Leung, L. R., Lu, J., Luo, J.-J., Mao, J., Mizielinski, M. S., Mizuta, R., Nobre, P., Satoh, M., Scoccimarro, E., Semmler, T., Small, J., and von Storch, J.-S.: High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 4185–4208, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4185-2016, 2016.
Haas, O:. Final data, Figshare [data set], https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24764589, 2023a.
Haas, O.: Set up the models, Figshare [code], https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24764583, 2023b.
Haas, O.: Run models, Figshare [code], https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24764577, 2023c.
Haas, O.: Results scripts, Figshare [code], https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24764571, 2023d.
Haas, O., Prentice, I. C., and Harrison, S. P.: Global environmental controls on wildfire burnt area, size, and intensity, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 065004, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac6a69, 2022.
Haas, O., Prentice, I. C., and Harrison, S. P.: Wildfires on a changing planet, Nat. Commun., 17, 1599, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-68176-4, 2026.
Hantson, S., Andela, N., Goulden, M. L., and Randerson, J. T.: Human-ignited fires result in more extreme fire behavior and ecosystem impacts, Nat. Commun., 13, 2717, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30030-2, 2022.
Hardesty, J., Myers, R., and Fulks, W.: Fire, Ecosystems, and People: A Preliminary Assessment of Fire as a Global Conservation Issue, The George Wright Forum, 22, 78–87, http://www.jstor.org/stable/43597968 (last access: 27 October 2026), 2005.
Hartley, A., Lott, F., Ciavarella, A., Burton, C., and Potts, B.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Present-Day Attribution using HadGEM3-A large ensemble, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21379381, 2026.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020.
Insurance Bureau of Canada: August wildfire in Newfoundland and Labrador causes over $70 million in insured damage, https://www.ibc.ca/news-insights/news/august-wildfire-in-newfoundland-and-labrador-causes-over-70-million-in-insured-damage (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
Ito, A.: Disequilibrium of terrestrial ecosystem CO2 budget caused by disturbance-induced emissions and non-CO2 carbon export flows: a global model assessment, Earth Syst. Dynam., 10, 685–709, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-10-685-2019, 2019.
Iturbide, M., Gutiérrez, J. M., Alves, L. M., Bedia, J., Cerezo-Mota, R., Cimadevilla, E., Cofiño, A. S., Di Luca, A., Faria, S. H., Gorodetskaya, I. V., Hauser, M., Herrera, S., Hennessy, K., Hewitt, H. T., Jones, R. G., Krakovska, S., Manzanas, R., Martínez-Castro, D., Narisma, G. T., Nurhati, I. S., Pinto, I., Seneviratne, S. I., van den Hurk, B., and Vera, C. S.: An update of IPCC climate reference regions for subcontinental analysis of climate model data: definition and aggregated datasets, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 2959–2970, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-2959-2020, 2020.
Johnston, F. H., Williamson, G., Borchers-Arriagada, N., Henderson, S. B., and Bowman, D. M. J. S.: Climate Change, Landscape Fires, and Human Health: A Global Perspective, Annu. Rev. Publ. Health, 45, 295–314, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060222-034131, 2024.
Jones, M. W., Abatzoglou, J. T., Veraverbeke, S., Andela, N., Lasslop, G., Forkel, M., Smith, A. J. P., Burton, C., Betts, R. A., Werf, G. R. van der, Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Santín, C., Kolden, C., Doerr, S. H., and Quéré, C. L.: Global and Regional Trends and Drivers of Fire Under Climate Change, Rev. Geophys., 60, e2020RG000726, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020RG000726, 2022.
Jones, M. W., Veraverbeke, S., Andela, N., Doerr, S. H., Kolden, C., Mataveli, G., Pettinari, M. L., Le Quéré, C., Rosan, T. M., van der Werf, G. R., van Wees, D., and Abatzoglou, J. T.: Global rise in forest fire emissions linked to climate change in the extratropics, Science, 386, eadl5889, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adl5889, 2024a.
Jones, M. W., Kelley, D. I., Burton, C. A., Di Giuseppe, F., Barbosa, M. L. F., Brambleby, E., Hartley, A. J., Lombardi, A., Mataveli, G., McNorton, J. R., Spuler, F. R., Wessel, J. B., Abatzoglou, J. T., Anderson, L. O., Andela, N., Archibald, S., Armenteras, D., Burke, E., Carmenta, R., Chuvieco, E., Clarke, H., Doerr, S. H., Fernandes, P. M., Giglio, L., Hamilton, D. S., Hantson, S., Harris, S., Jain, P., Kolden, C. A., Kurvits, T., Lampe, S., Meier, S., New, S., Parrington, M., Perron, M. M. G., Qu, Y., Ribeiro, N. S., Saharjo, B. H., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Shuman, J. K., Tanpipat, V., van der Werf, G. R., Veraverbeke, S., and Xanthopoulos, G.: State of Wildfires 2023–2024, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 3601–3685, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-3601-2024, 2024b.
Jones, M. W., Andela, N., Brambleby, E., Chuvieco, E., Giglio, L., Kaiser, J. W., Parrington, M., Qu, Y., Torres-Vázquez, M. Á., van der Werf, G., and Veraverbeke, S.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Regional Summaries of Burned Area, Fire Emissions, and Individual Fire Characteristics for National, Administrative and Biogeographical Regions, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21262381, 2026a.
Jones, M. W., Abatzoglou, J. T., Burton, C., Fernandes, P. M., Jain, P., Keeping, T., Tanpipat, V., and Kolden, C. A.: Wildfires in 2025, Nat. Rev. Earth. Environ., 7, 334–336, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-026-00793-z, 2026b.
Kaiser, J. W., Heil, A., Andreae, M. O., Benedetti, A., Chubarova, N., Jones, L., Morcrette, J.-J., Razinger, M., Schultz, M. G., Suttie, M., and van der Werf, G. R.: Biomass burning emissions estimated with a global fire assimilation system based on observed fire radiative power, Biogeosciences, 9, 527–554, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-527-2012, 2012.
Kaplan, J. O., Bigelow, N. H., Prentice, I. C., Harrison, S. P., Bartlein, P. J., Christensen, T. R., Cramer, W., Matveyeva, N. V., McGuire, A. D., Murray, D. F., Razzhivin, V. Y., Smith, B., Walker, D. A., Anderson, P. M., Andreev, A. A., Brubaker, L. B., Edwards, M. E., and Lozhkin, A. V.: Climate change and Arctic ecosystems: 2. Modeling, paleodata-model comparisons, and future projections, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002559, 2003.
Keeping, T.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: WWA Attribution and Future Projection of Focal Events Using FWI95, Zenodo [data set and code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21374687, 2026.
Keeping, T., García, D. G., D. G., Trigo, R., Santos, F. L. M., Barnes, C., Vahlberg, M., Meyer, R., and Otto, F.: Extreme fire weather conditions in Spain and Portugal now common due to climate change, World Weather Attribution, https://www.worldweatherattribution.org/extreme-fire-weather-conditions-in-spain-and-portugal-now-common-due-to-climate-change/ (last access: 13 October 2026), 2025.
Keeping, T. R., Zachariah, M., Haas, O., Grillakis, M., Barnes, C., Clay, G. D., Ekberzade, B., Jaupaj, O., Ribeiro, A., Trigo, R., Voulgarakis, A., and Otto, F. E. L.: Attribution of the record breaking 2025 European fire season to climate change, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 3761–3813, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-3761-2026, 2026.
Kelley, D., Ferreira Barbosa, M. L., Burton, C., Spuler, F., Wessel, J., Hartley, A., Ciavarella, A., Jones, M. W., Potts, B., Qu, Y., and Lott, F.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Midwestern Canadian Shield Forests Burned Area Attribution and Projections, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23306277, 2026a.
Kelley, D., Ferreira Barbosa, M. L., Burton, C., Spuler, F., Wessel, J., Hartley, A., Ciavarella, A., Jones, M. W., Potts, B., Qu, Y., and Lott, F.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Northwest Iberia Burned Area Attribution and Projections, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23306176, 2026b.
Kelley, D., Ferreira Barbosa, M. L., Burton, C., Spuler, F., Wessel, J., Hartley, A., Ciavarella, A., Jones, M. W., Potts, B., Qu, Y., and Lott, F.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Chilean Temperate Forests and Matorral Burned Area Attribution and Projections, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23305946, 2026c.
Kelley, D., Ferreira Barbosa, M. L., Burton, C., Potts, B., Wessel, J., and Spuler, F.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: ConFLAME, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11421746, 2026d.
Kelley, D. I., Bistinas, I., Whitley, R., Burton, C., Marthews, T. R., and Dong, N.: How contemporary bioclimatic and human controls change global fire regimes, Nat. Clim. Change, 9, 690–696, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0540-7, 2019.
Kelley, D. I., Burton, C., Huntingford, C., Brown, M. A. J., Whitley, R., and Dong, N.: Technical note: Low meteorological influence found in 2019 Amazonia fires, Biogeosciences, 18, 787–804, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-787-2021, 2021.
Kelley, D. I., Burton, C., Di Giuseppe, F., Jones, M. W., Barbosa, M. L. F., Brambleby, E., McNorton, J. R., Liu, Z., Bradley, A. S. I., Blackford, K., Burke, E., Ciavarella, A., Di Tomaso, E., Eden, J., Ferreira, I. J. M., Fiedler, L., Hartley, A. J., Keeping, T. R., Lampe, S., Lombardi, A., Mataveli, G., Qu, Y., Silva, P. S., Spuler, F. R., Steinmann, C. B., Torres-Vázquez, M. Á., Veiga, R., van Wees, D., Wessel, J. B., Wright, E., Bilbao, B., Bourbonnais, M., Gao, C., Di Bella, C. M., Dintwe, K., Donovan, V. M., Harris, S., Kukavskaya, E. A., N'Dri, A. B., Santín, C., Selaya, G., Sjöström, J., Abatzoglou, J. T., Andela, N., Carmenta, R., Chuvieco, E., Giglio, L., Hamilton, D. S., Hantson, S., Meier, S., Parrington, M., Sadegh, M., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Sedano, F., Turco, M., van der Werf, G. R., Veraverbeke, S., Anderson, L. O., Clarke, H., Fernandes, P. M., and Kolden, C. A.: State of Wildfires 2024–2025, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 5377–5488, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5377-2025, 2025.
Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., van Drecht, G., and de Vos, M.: The HYDE 3.1 spatially explicit database of human-induced global land-use change over the past 12,000 years, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 20, 73–86, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00587.x, 2011.
Kolden, C. A., Donovan, V. M., Shuman, J., Jain, P., Abatzoglou, J. T., and Bourbonnais, M. L.: State of Wildfires in North America 2025–2026, SSRN [preprint], https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7080898, 28 June 2026.
Kreider, M. R., Higuera, P. E., Parks, S. A., Rice, W. L., White, N., and Larson, A. J.: Fire suppression makes wildfires more severe and accentuates impacts of climate change and fuel accumulation, Nat. Commun., 15, 2412, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46702-0, 2024.
Kukavskaya, E. A., Zheng, B., and Tanpipat, V.: State of Wildfires in Asia 2025–2026, SSRN [preprint], https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7091518, 30 May 2026.
Lampe, S.: BuRNN: A Data-Driven Fire Model, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17778519, 2025a.
Lampe, S.: VUB-HYDR/BuRNN: Version 1.1, Zenodo [data set and code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17834206, 2025b.
Lampe, S., Gudmundsson, L., Kraft, B., Hantson, S., Kelley, D., Humphrey, V., Le Saux, B., Chuvieco, E., and Thiery, W.: BuRNN (v1.0): a data-driven fire model, Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 955–988, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-955-2026, 2026.
Lange, S.: Trend-preserving bias adjustment and statistical downscaling with ISIMIP3BASD (v1.0), Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3055–3070, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3055-2019, 2019.
Leedham, C., Allen, M., and Walsh, T.: Global Warming Index. Tracking progress to a safe climate, https://gwi-website.vercel.app/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
Libonati, R., Geirinhas, J. L., Silva, P. S., Russo, A., Rodrigues, J. A., Belém, L. B. C., Nogueira, J., Roque, F. O., DaCamara, C. C., Nunes, A. M. B., Marengo, J. A., and Trigo, R. M.: Assessing the role of compound drought and heatwave events on unprecedented 2020 wildfires in the Pantanal, Environ. Res. Lett., 17, 015005, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac462e, 2022.
Linley, G. D., Jolly, C. J., Doherty, T. S., Geary, W. L., Armenteras, D., Belcher, C. M., Bliege Bird, R., Duane, A., Fletcher, M.-S., Giorgis, M. A., Haslem, A., Jones, G. M., Kelly, L. T., Lee, C. K. F., Nolan, R. H., Parr, C. L., Pausas, J. G., Price, J. N., Regos, A., Ritchie, E. G., Ruffault, J., Williamson, G. J., Wu, Q., and Nimmo, D. G.: What do you mean, “megafire”?, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 31, 1906–1922, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13499, 2022.
Linley, G. D., Jolly, C. J., Doherty, T. S., Geary, W. L., Armenteras, D., Belcher, C. M., Bliege Bird, R., Duane, A., Fletcher, M.-S., Giorgis, M. A., Haslem, A., Jones, G. M., Kelly, L. T., Lee, C. K. F., Nolan, R. H., Parr, C. L., Pausas, J. G., Price, J. N., Regos, A., Ritchie, E. G., Ruffault, J., Williamson, G. J., Wu, Q., and Nimmo, D. G.: “Megafire” – You May Not Like It, But You Cannot Avoid It, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 34, e70032, https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.70032, 2025.
Liu, R., Zhang, X., Wang, W., Wang, Y., Liu, H., Ma, M., and Tang, G.: Global-scale ERA5 product precipitation and temperature evaluation, Ecol. Indic., 166, 112481, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112481, 2024.
Liu, Z. and Eden, J.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Present-Day Attribution and Future Projections of Focal Events Using FWI7X, Zenodo [data set, code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20827512, 2026.
Liu, Z., Eden, J. M., Dieppois, B., Drobyshev, I., Krikken, F., and Blackett, M.: Global assessment of historical changes in extreme fire weather: Insight from CMIP6 ensembles and implications for probabilistic attribution to global warming, Global Planet. Change, 252, 104822, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2025.104822, 2025.
Lizundia-Loiola, J., Otón, G., Ramo, R., and Chuvieco, E.: A spatio-temporal active-fire clustering approach for global burned area mapping at 250 m from MODIS data, Remote Sens. Environ., 236, 111493, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111493, 2020.
Lizundia-Loiola, J., Franquesa, M., Khairoun, A., and Chuvieco, E.: Global burned area mapping from Sentinel-3 Synergy and VIIRS active fires, Remote Sens. Environ., 282, 113298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2022.113298, 2022.
Lundberg, S. M. and Lee, S.-I.: A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions, ArXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874, 2017.
Maclean, K., Hankins, D. L., Christianson, A. C., Oliveras, I., Bilbao, B. A., Costello, O., Langer, E. R., and Robinson, C. J.: Revitalising Indigenous cultural fire practice: benefits and partnerships, Trends Ecol. Evol., 38, 899–902, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2023.07.001, 2023.
Mastrandrea, M. D., Field, C. B., Stocker, T. F., Edenhofer, O., Ebi, K. L., Frame, D. J., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Mach, K. J., Matschoss, P. R., Plattner, G.-K., Yohe, G. W., and Zwiers, F. W.: Guidance note for lead authors of the IPCC fifth assessment report on consistent treatment of uncertainties, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), https://www.ipcc.ch/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2010.
Mathison, C., Burke, E., Hartley, A. J., Kelley, D. I., Burton, C., Robertson, E., Gedney, N., Williams, K., Wiltshire, A., Ellis, R. J., Sellar, A. A., and Jones, C. D.: Description and evaluation of the JULES-ES set-up for ISIMIP2b, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4249–4264, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4249-2023, 2023.
McNorton, J., Barnard, C., and Di Giuseppe, F.: AI-Probability-of-Fire: Probability of Fire (PoF) Jupyter Book (v1), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23691112, 2026.
McNorton, J., Moreno, A., Turco, M., Keune, J., and Di Giuseppe, F.: Hydroclimatic Rebound Drives Extreme Fire in California's Non-Forested Ecosystems, Glob. Change Biol., 31, e70481, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70481, 2025.
McNorton, J. R. and Di Giuseppe, F.: A global fuel characteristic model and dataset for wildfire prediction, Biogeosciences, 21, 279–300, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-279-2024, 2024.
McNorton, J. R., Di Giuseppe, F., Pinnington, E., Chantry, M., and Barnard, C.: A Global Probability-Of-Fire (PoF) Forecast, Geophys. Res. Lett., 51, e2023GL107929, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL107929, 2024.
Met Office: Dataset Collection Record: EUCLEIA: European Climate and weather Events: Interpretation and Attribution, CEDA [data set], https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/99b29b4bfeae470599fb96243e90cde3/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2016.
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N. J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4349–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021, 2021.
NASA Earth Observatory: A Haze Over North America, https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/a-haze-over-north-america-154383/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
NASA FIRMS: Fire Information for Resource Management System. MODIS and VIIRS Fire Data, NASA FIRMS [data set], https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/map/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
North Australia and Rangelands Fire Information (NAFI) and Charles Darwin University: NAFI fire year summary report 2025 (1.1; NAFI), https://nafi-fire-report-2025.lkvl.net/ (last access:22 July 2026), 2026.
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V. N., Underwood, E. C., D'amico, J. A., Itoua, I., Strand, H. E., Morrison, J. C., Loucks, C. J., Allnutt, T. F., Ricketts, T. H., Kura, Y., Lamoreux, J. F., Wettengel, W. W., Hedao, P., and Kassem, K. R.: Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A New Map of Life on Earth, BioScience, 51, 933, https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051%5B0933:TEOTWA%5D2.0.CO;2, 2001.
Otto, F. E. L., Barnes, C., Philip, S., Kew, S., van Oldenborgh, G. J., and Vautard, R.: Formally combining different lines of evidence in extreme-event attribution, Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 10, 159–171, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-10-159-2024, 2024.
Overland, J. E., Chandra, V., and Wang, M.: Wildfires as Emerging Dominant Arctic and Subarctic Extremes, Climate, 14, 65, https://doi.org/10.3390/cli14030065, 2026.
Parrington, M., Whaley, C. H., French, N. H. F., Buchholz, R. R., Pan, X., Wiedinmyer, C., Hyer, E. J., Kondragunta, S., Kaiser, J. W., Di Tomaso, E., van der Werf, G. R., Sofiev, M., Barsanti, K. C., da Silva, A. M., Darmenov, A. S., Tang, W., Griffin, D., Desservettaz, M., Carter, T. (Tess), Paton-Walsh, C., Liu, T., Uppstu, A., and Palamarchuk, J.: Biomass burning emission estimation in the MODIS era: State-of-the-art and future directions, Elementa, 13, 00089, https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2024.00089, 2025.
Philip, S., Kew, S., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Otto, F., Vautard, R., van der Wiel, K., King, A., Lott, F., Arrighi, J., Singh, R., and van Aalst, M.: A protocol for probabilistic extreme event attribution analyses, Adv. Stat. Clim. Meteorol. Oceanogr., 6, 177–203, https://doi.org/10.5194/ascmo-6-177-2020, 2020.
Philip, S. Y., Kew, S. F., van Oldenborgh, G. J., Anslow, F. S., Seneviratne, S. I., Vautard, R., Coumou, D., Ebi, K. L., Arrighi, J., Singh, R., van Aalst, M., Pereira Marghidan, C., Wehner, M., Yang, W., Li, S., Schumacher, D. L., Hauser, M., Bonnet, R., Luu, L. N., Lehner, F., Gillett, N., Tradowsky, J. S., Vecchi, G. A., Rodell, C., Stull, R. B., Howard, R., and Otto, F. E. L.: Rapid attribution analysis of the extraordinary heat wave on the Pacific coast of the US and Canada in June 2021, Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1689–1713, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1689-2022, 2022.
PIB Delhi: India's Resolution on “Strengthening the Global Management of Wildfires” adopted at UNEA-7, in Nairobi, https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2203299®=3&lang=1 (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
Potts, B. and Burton, C.: State of Wildfires 2025-26 Attribution Pipeline For HadGEM3-A (Version V1.0.2), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23341498, 2026.
Prime Minister of Canada: Kananaskis Wildfire Charter, Prime Minister of Canada, https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/statements/2025/06/17/kananaskis-wildfire-chart (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
Province of Manitoba: 2025 Wildfire Interim After Action Review, https://news.gov.mb.ca/news/index.html?item=73482&posted=2026-04-21 (last access: 13 October 2026), 2026.
Public Safety Canada: Past Events, https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/mrgnc-mngmnt/rspndng-mrgnc-vnts/gvrnmnt-prtns-cntr/pst-vnts-en.aspx (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
Quilcaille, Y., Batibeniz, F., Ribeiro, A. F. S., Padrón, R. S., and Seneviratne, S. I.: Fire weather index data under historical and shared socioeconomic pathway projections in the 6th phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project from 1850 to 2100, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2153–2177, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2153-2023, 2023.
Quintero, N., Viedma, O., and Moreno, J. M.: Protected and non-protected areas burned at a similar fire severity within the 2025 megafires in Spain, Fire Ecol., https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-026-00512-5, 2026.
Ramos, A. M., Russo, A., DaCamara, C. C., Nunes, S., Sousa, P., Soares, P. M. M., Lima, M. M., Hurduc, A., and Trigo, R. M.: The compound event that triggered the destructive fires of October 2017 in Portugal, iScience, 26, 106141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.106141, 2023.
Rantanen, M., Karpechko, A. Y., Lipponen, A., Nordling, K., Hyvärinen, O., Ruosteenoja, K., Vihma, T., and Laaksonen, A.: The Arctic has warmed nearly four times faster than the globe since 1979, Commun. Earth Environ., 3, 168, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00498-3, 2022.
Rayner, N. A., Parker, D. E., Horton, E. B., Folland, C. K., Alexander, L. V., Rowell, D. P., Kent, E. C., and Kaplan, A.: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670, 2003.
Rémy, S., Veira, A., Paugam, R., Sofiev, M., Kaiser, J. W., Marenco, F., Burton, S. P., Benedetti, A., Engelen, R. J., Ferrare, R., and Hair, J. W.: Two global data sets of daily fire emission injection heights since 2003, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2921–2942, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2921-2017, 2017.
Resco de Dios, V., Cunill Camprubí, À., Campos-Arceiz, A., Clarke, H., He, Y., Zveushe, O. K., Domènech, R., Ying, H., and Yao, Y.: Protected Areas Show Substantial and Increasing Risk of Wildfire Globally, Fire, 8, 405, https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8100405, 2025.
Reynolds, V. A., Harris, S., Doherty, T. S., Fisher, R., Nolan, R. H., Peace, M., Pearce, H. G., Telfer, S., Yebra, M., and Clarke, H.: State of Wildfires in Oceania 2025–2026: contrasting fire regimes and emerging extremes, SSRN [preprint], https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6999238, 25 June 2026.
Riahi, K., van Vuuren, D. P., Kriegler, E., Edmonds, J., O'Neill, B. C., Fujimori, S., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Fricko, O., Lutz, W., Popp, A., Cuaresma, J. C., Kc, S., Leimbach, M., Jiang, L., Kram, T., Rao, S., Emmerling, J., Ebi, K., Hasegawa, T., Havlik, P., Humpenöder, F., Da Silva, L. A., Smith, S., Stehfest, E., Bosetti, V., Eom, J., Gernaat, D., Masui, T., Rogelj, J., Strefler, J., Drouet, L., Krey, V., Luderer, G., Harmsen, M., Takahashi, K., Baumstark, L., Doelman, J. C., Kainuma, M., Klimont, Z., Marangoni, G., Lotze-Campen, H., Obersteiner, M., Tabeau, A., and Tavoni, M.: The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview, Global Environ. Change, 42, 153–168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.009, 2017.
Richardson, D., Black, A. S., Irving, D., Matear, R. J., Monselesan, D. P., Risbey, J. S., Squire, D. T., and Tozer, C. R.: Global increase in wildfire potential from compound fire weather and drought, npj Clim Atmos. Sci., 5, 23, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-022-00248-4, 2022.
Roos, C. I., Swetnam, T. W., Ferguson, T. J., Liebmann, M. J., Loehman, R. A., Welch, J. R., Margolis, E. Q., Guiterman, C. H., Hockaday, W. C., Aiuvalasit, M. J., Battillo, J., Farella, J., and Kiahtipes, C. A.: Native American fire management at an ancient wildland–urban interface in the Southwest United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2018733118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2018733118, 2021.
Roșu, I.-A., Mourgela, R., and Voulgarakis, A.: Data for “Large-scale modelled impacts of the 2025 Canadian wildfires” by Rosu et al., Zenodo [data set and code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20523005, 2026a.
Roșu, I.-A., Mourgela, R.-N., and Voulgarakis, A.: Large-scale modelled impacts of the 2025 Canadian wildfires, SSRN [preprint], https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6988718, 2026b.
Sánchez-Hernández, G., Turco, M., Repeto-Deudero, I., Royé, D., Baudena, M., Montávez, J. P., Pietroiusti, R., Provenzale, A., Santin, C., Torres-Vázquez, M. Á., and Pausas, J. G.: Record-Breaking 2025 European Wildfires Concentrated in Northwest Iberia, Glob. Change Biol., 31, e70649, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70649, 2025.
Saskatchewan Public Safety Agency: Review of the 2025 Saskatchewan Wildfire Season, https://www.saskatchewan.ca/government/news-and-media/2026/june/12/province-announces-immediate-actions-in-response-to-independent-review-of-2025-wildfire-season (last access: 13 October 2026), 2026.
Schoenecker, J., Baur, M. J., Kohli, J., Baker, S., Jones, M., Veraverbeke, S., Konings, A. G., and Pellegrini, A. F. A.: Widespread peat carbon losses driven by the 2025 Scottish megafire, Nat. Geosci., 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-01994-3, 2026.
Scholten, R. C., Jandt, R., Miller, E. A., Rogers, B. M., and Veraverbeke, S.: Overwintering fires in boreal forests, Nature, 593, 399–404, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03437-y, 2021.
Schumacher, D., Bauer, V., Pierini, L., Hauser, M., Gu, L., and Seneviratne, S.: Past atmospheric circulation changes prime regional heatwaves for future surprises, Research Square [preprint], https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-9901987/v1, 3 June 2026.
Secretaría de Bosques de Chubut: Informe sobre ocurrencia de incendios forestales en Chubut, https://bosques.chubut.gov.ar/2025/11/06/ocurrencias-de-incendios-forestales-en-chubut/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
Sedano, F., Maianti, P., Boca, R., Suarez-Moreno, M., Broglia, M., Rigo, D. de, Roglia, E., Branco, A., San-Miguel-Ayanz, J., Durrant, T., Ferrari, D., Scionti, N., Nikonovas, T., Oom, D., and Artés Vivancos, T.: Advance report on forest fires in Europe, Middle East and North Africa 2025, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, https://doi.org/10.2760/3859043https://doi.org/10.2760/3859043, 2026.
Seneviratne, S. I. and Hauser, M.: Regional climate sensitivity of climate extremes in CMIP6 vs CMIP5 multi-model ensembles. Earth's Future, 8, e2019EF001474, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001474, 2020.
Skakun, R., Castilla, G., and Jain, P.: Mapping wildfires in Canada with Landsat MSS to extend the National Burned Area Composite (NBAC) time series back to 1972, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 33, WF24138, https://doi.org/10.1071/WF24138, 2024.
Spuler, F. R., Wessel, J. B., Comyn-Platt, E., Varndell, J., and Cagnazzo, C.: ibicus: a new open-source Python package and comprehensive interface for statistical bias adjustment and evaluation in climate modelling (v1.0.1), Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1249–1269, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1249-2024, 2024.
State of Wildfires Project: State of Wildfires Project, https://stateofwildfires.com/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
Stehfest, E., Van Vuuren, D. P., Bouwman, L., and Kram, T.: Integrated assessment of global environmental change with IMAGE 3.0: Model description and policy applications., Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL), The Hague, ISBN: 978-94-91506-71-0, https://www.pbl.nl/en/publications/integrated-assessment-of-global-environmental-change-with-image-30-model-description-and-policy-applications (last access: 13 October 2026), 2014.
Steinmann, C. B.: State-of-Wildfires_CLIMADA, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21393395, 2026.
Steinmann, C. B., Juhel, S., and Jones, M.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Physical Asset Exposure to Wildfire, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21332621, 2026.
Stocker, B. D., Wang, H., Smith, N. G., Harrison, S. P., Keenan, T. F., Sandoval, D., Davis, T., and Prentice, I. C.: P-model v1.0: an optimality-based light use efficiency model for simulating ecosystem gross primary production, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 1545–1581, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1545-2020, 2020.
Sulla-Menashe, D., Gray, J. M., Abercrombie, S. P., and Friedl, M. A.: Hierarchical mapping of annual global land cover 2001 to present: The MODIS Collection 6 Land Cover product, Remote Sens. Environ., 222, 183–194, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.013, 2019.
Taylor, I., Kelley, D. I., Mathison, C., Bett-Williams, K. E., Hartley, A. J., Betts, R. A., Burton, C., and Barbosa, M. L. F.: Future fire weather projections show the importance of mitigation and adaptation for dynamic fire management, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 4257–4289, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-26-4257-2026, 2026.
Tedim, F. and Leone, V.: The Dilemma of Wildfire Definition: What It Reveals and What It Implies, Front. For. Glob. Change, 3, https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2020.553116, 2020.
Teymoor Seydi, S., Abatzoglou, J. T., Jones, M. W., Kolden, C. A., Filippelli, G., Hurteau, M. D., AghaKouchak, A., Luce, C. H., Miao, C., and Sadegh, M.: Increasing global human exposure to wildland fires despite declining burned area, Science, 389, 826–829, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adu6408, 2025.
Teymoor Seydi, S., Sadegh, M., and Jones, M.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Population Exposure to Wildfire, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20787866, 2026.
The Insurer: CatIQ: Insurers facing C$300 million hit from early summer Canada wildfires, https://www.theinsurer.com/ti/news/catiq-insurers-facing-c300-million-hit-from-early-summer-canada-wildfires-2025-09-08/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
The Narwhal: Counting up receipts: one of Canada's worst wildfire seasons cost at least $500M, https://thenarwhal.ca/manitoba-wildfire-costs/ (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
Thomson, D. R., Leasure, D. R., Bird, T., Tzavidis, N., and Tatem, A. J.: How accurate are WorldPop-Global-Unconstrained gridded population data at the cell-level?: A simulation analysis in urban Namibia, PLoS ONE, 17, e0271504, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271504, 2022.
Torres-Vázquez, M. Á., Di Giuseppe, F., Moreno-Torreira, A., Gincheva, A., Jerez, S., and Turco, M.: Large increase in extreme fire weather synchronicity over Europe, Environ. Res. Lett., 20, 024045, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ada8c2, 2025.
Torres-Vázquez, M. Á., Segura-Garcia, C., Turco, M., Khairoun, A., Pettinari, M. L., Solano-Romero, E., García, M., Oliva, P., Jones, M. W., and Chuvieco, E.: MRBA60: Long-term consistent global burned area dataset from Sentinel-3 and MODIS products, Sci. Data, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-026-07959-w, in review, 2026.
Turco, M., Jones, M., and Di Giuseppe, F.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: Anomalies in Extreme Fire Weather Days by Continent, Biome, Country, and Administrative Region, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20757872, 2026a.
Turco, M., Moreno, A., Garnés-Morales, G., Torres-Vázquez, M. Á., Di Giuseppe, F., Bedia, J., Herrera, S., Provenzale, A., and Abatzoglou, J. T.: The emerging human fingerprint on global extreme fire weather, Sci. Adv., 12, eadx9845, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx9845, 2026b.
Tymstra, C. and Flannigan, M.: Canada's landscape fires spreading into uncharted territory, Environ. Res. Lett., 20, 111003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae1495, 2025.
UC Davis: Global Administative Areas Database, GADM.org [data set], https://gadm.org/download_world.html (last access: 22 July 2026), 2022.
United Nations: Resolution adopted by the United Nations Environment Assembly on 12 December 2025, https://www.unep.org/environmentassembly/unea7 (last access: 22 July 2026), 2025.
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., Collatz, G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., and Arellano Jr., A. F.: Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3423–3441, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3423-2006, 2006.
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 697–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017, 2017.
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., van Wees, D., Chen, Y., Giglio, L., Hall, J., Vernooij, R., Mu, M., Binte Shahid, S., Barsanti, K. C., Yokelson, R., and Morton, D. C.: Landscape fire emissions from the 5th version of the Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED5), Sci. Data, 12, 1870, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06127-w, 2025.
Van Vuuren, D. P., O'Neill, B. C., Tebaldi, C., Sanderson, B. M., Chini, L. P., Friedlingstein, P., Hasegawa, T., Riahi, K., Govindasamy, B., Bauer, N., Eyring, V., Fall, C. M. N., Frieler, K., Gidden, M. J., Gohar, L. K., Högner, A., Jones, A. D., Kikstra, J., King, A., Knutti, R., Kriegler, E., Lawrence, P., Lennard, C., Lowe, J., Mathison, C., Mehmood, S., Nicholls, Z., Prado, L. F., Zhang, Q., Rose, S. K., Ruane, A. C., Sandstad, M., Schleussner, C.-F., Seferian, R., Sillmann, J., Smith, C., Sörensson, A. A., Panickal, S., Tachiiri, K., Vaughan, N., Vishwanathan, S. S., Yokohata, T., Zecchetto, M., and Ziehn, T.: The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7 (ScenarioMIP-CMIP7), Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 2627–2656, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-2627-2026, 2026.
Vernooij, R., Eames, T., Russell-Smith, J., Yates, C., Beatty, R., Evans, J., Edwards, A., Ribeiro, N., Wooster, M., Strydom, T., Giongo, M. V., Borges, M. A., Menezes Costa, M., Barradas, A. C. S., van Wees, D., and Van der Werf, G. R.: Dynamic savanna burning emission factors based on satellite data using a machine learning approach, Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 1039–1064, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-1039-2023, 2023.
Wessel, J. and Spuler, F.: State of Wildfires 2025–2026: JULES-ES Bias Adjustment, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21397548, 2026.
Wiedinmyer, C., Kimura, Y., McDonald-Buller, E. C., Emmons, L. K., Buchholz, R. R., Tang, W., Seto, K., Joseph, M. B., Barsanti, K. C., Carlton, A. G., and Yokelson, R.: The Fire Inventory from NCAR version 2.5: an updated global fire emissions model for climate and chemistry applications, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3873–3891, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3873-2023, 2023.
Wooster, M. J., Roberts, G. J., Giglio, L., Roy, D. P., Freeborn, P. H., Boschetti, L., Justice, C., Ichoku, C., Schroeder, W., Davies, D., Smith, A. M. S., Setzer, A., Csiszar, I., Strydom, T., Frost, P., Zhang, T., Xu, W., de Jong, M. C., Johnston, J. M., Ellison, L., Vadrevu, K., Sparks, A. M., Nguyen, H., McCarty, J., Tanpipat, V., Schmidt, C., and San-Miguel-Ayanz, J.: Satellite remote sensing of active fires: History and current status, applications and future requirements, Remote Sens. of Environ., 267, 112694, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112694, 2021.
World Bank: Wealth Accounting, World Bank [data set], https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/search/dataset/0042066 (last access: 22 July 2026), 2024.
World Health Organization: WHO: WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228 (last access: 22 July 2026), 2021.
World Meteorological Organization: WMO: Prepare for El Niño, World Meteorological Organization, https://wmo.int/news/media-centre/wmo-prepare-el-nino, (last access: 22 July 2026), 2026.
Xu, R., Ye, T., Huang, W., Yue, X., Morawska, L., Abramson, M. J., Chen, G., Yu, P., Liu, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Wu, Y., Yu, W., Wen, B., Zhang, Y., Hales, S., Lavigne, E., Saldiva, P. H. N., Coelho, M. S. Z. S., Matus, P., Roye, D., Klompmaker, J., Mistry, M., Breitner, S., Zeka, A., Raz, R., Tong, S., Johnston, F. H., Schwartz, J., Gasparrini, A., Guo, Y., and Li, S.: Global, regional, and national mortality burden attributable to air pollution from landscape fires: a health impact assessment study, Lancet, 404, 2447–2459, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02251-7, 2024.
Yin, C., Abatzoglou, J. T., Jones, M. W., Cullen, A. C., Sadegh, M., Wang, J., and Liu, Y.: Increasing synchronicity of global extreme fire weather, Sci. Adv., 12, eadx8813, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adx8813, 2026.
Zheng, B., Ciais, P., Chevallier, F., Chuvieco, E., Chen, Y., and Yang, H.: Increasing forest fire emissions despite the decline in global burned area, Sci. Adv., 7, eabh2646, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abh2646, 2021.
Editorial statement
State of Wildfires 2025–2026: A Quiet Global Fire Year, Devastating Regional Extremes
Despite global burned area and fire carbon emissions falling 18% and 20–31% below historical averages, respectively, devastating wildfire extremes affected Canada, Europe, and South America. The State of Wildfires 2025–2026 report combines satellite observations, climate attribution, and future projections to reveal how climate change amplifies regional wildfire risks, providing critical insights for preparedness, adaptation, and mitigation.
State of Wildfires 2025–2026: A Quiet Global Fire Year, Devastating Regional...
Short summary
The third State of Wildfires report examines extreme wildfire events from 2025 to early 2026. It analyses key regional events in Midwestern Canadian Shield Forests, Northwest Iberia, and Chilean Temperate Forests and Matorral, assessing their impacts, drivers, and attributing them to climate change. Climate change greatly increased the likelihood of these fires, and without strong mitigation, such events will become more frequent.
The third State of Wildfires report examines extreme wildfire events from 2025 to early 2026. It...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint