Comprehensive data set of in situ hydraulic stimulation experiments for geothermal purposes at the  Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory (Sweden)

Zang, Arno; Niemz, Peter; von Specht, Sebastian; Zimmermann, Günter; Milkereit, Claus; Plenkers, Katrin; Klee, Gerd

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-295-2024

Articles | Volume 16, issue 1

https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-295-2024

© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-295-2024

© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 16, issue 1

Data description paper

|

12 Jan 2024

Data description paper |

| 12 Jan 2024

Comprehensive data set of in situ hydraulic stimulation experiments for geothermal purposes at the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory (Sweden)

Arno Zang, Peter Niemz, Sebastian von Specht, Günter Zimmermann, Claus Milkereit, Katrin Plenkers, and Gerd Klee

Related authors

Updating induced seismic hazard assessments during hydraulic stimulation experiments in underground laboratories: workflow and limitations

Valentin Samuel Gischig, Antonio Pio Rinaldi, Andres Alcolea, Falko Bethman, Marco Broccardo, Kai Bröker, Raymi Castilla, Federico Ciardo, Victor Clasen Repollés, Virginie Durand, Nima Gholizadeh Doonechaly, Marian Hertrich, Rebecca Hochreutener, Philipp Kästli, Dimitrios Karvounis, Xiaodong Ma, Men-Andrin Meier, Peter Meier, Maria Mesimeri, Arnaud Mignan, Anne Obermann, Katrin Plenkers, Martina Rosskopf, Francisco Serbeto, Paul Selvadurai, Alexis Shakas, Linus Villiger, Quinn Wenning, Alba Zappone, Jordan Aaron, Hansruedi Maurer, Domenico Giardini, and Stefan Wiemer

Solid Earth, 16, 1153–1180, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-1153-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-16-1153-2025, 2025

Short summary

REHEATFUNQ (REgional HEAT-Flow Uncertainty and aNomaly Quantification) 2.0.1: a model for regional aggregate heat flow distributions and anomaly quantification

Malte Jörn Ziebarth and Sebastian von Specht

Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 2783–2828, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2783-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-2783-2024, 2024

Short summary

In situ stress database of the greater Ruhr region (Germany) derived from hydrofracturing tests and borehole logs

Michal Kruszewski, Gerd Klee, Thomas Niederhuber, and Oliver Heidbach

Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5367–5385, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5367-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5367-2022, 2022

Short summary

Cited articles

Amann, F., Gischig, V., Evans, K., Doetsch, J., Jalali, R., Valley, B., Krietsch, H., Dutler, N., Villiger, L., Brixel, B., Klepikova, M., Kittilä, A., Madonna, C., Wiemer, S., Saar, M. O., Loew, S., Driesner, T., Maurer, H., and Giardini, D.: The seismo-hydromechanical behavior during deep geothermal reservoir stimulations: open questions tackled in a decameter-scale in situ stimulation experiment, Solid Earth, 9, 115–137, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-9-115-2018, 2018. a, b

Ask, D.: Measurement-Related Uncertainties in Overcoring Data at the Äspö HRL, Sweden. Part 2: Biaxial Tests of CSIRO HI Overcore Samples, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min., 43, 127–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.05.012, 2006. a

Baisch, S., Koch, C., and Muntendam-Bos, A.: Traffic Light Systems: To What Extent Can Induced Seismicity Be Controlled?, Seismol. Res. Lett., 90, 1145–1154, https://doi.org/10.1785/0220180337, 2019. a

Boese, C. M., Kwiatek, G., Fischer, T., Plenkers, K., Starke, J., Blümle, F., Janssen, C., and Dresen, G.: Seismic monitoring of the STIMTEC hydraulic stimulation experiment in anisotropic metamorphic gneiss, Solid Earth, 13, 323–346, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-323-2022, 2022. a

Bommer, J. J.: Earthquake Hazard and Risk Analysis for Natural and Induced Seismicity: Towards Objective Assessments in the Face of Uncertainty, B. Earthq. Eng., 20, 2825–3069, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01357-4, 2022. a