Articles | Volume 12, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-789-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-789-2020
Data description paper
 | 
02 Apr 2020
Data description paper |  | 02 Apr 2020

Mapping the yields of lignocellulosic bioenergy crops from observations at the global scale

Wei Li, Philippe Ciais, Elke Stehfest, Detlef van Vuuren, Alexander Popp, Almut Arneth, Fulvio Di Fulvio, Jonathan Doelman, Florian Humpenöder, Anna B. Harper, Taejin Park, David Makowski, Petr Havlik, Michael Obersteiner, Jingmeng Wang, Andreas Krause, and Wenfeng Liu

Related authors

Spatially varying parameters improve carbon cycle modeling in the Amazon rainforest with ORCHIDEE r8849
Lei Zhu, Philippe Ciais, Yitong Yao, Daniel Goll, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Isabel Martínez Cano, Arthur Fendrich, Laurent Li, Hui Yang, Sassan Saatchi, and Wei Li
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-397,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-397, 2025
Short summary
Reconstructed global monthly burned area maps from 1901 to 2020
Zhixuan Guo, Wei Li, Philippe Ciais, Stephen Sitch, Guido R. van der Werf, Simon P. K. Bowring, Ana Bastos, Florent Mouillot, Jiaying He, Minxuan Sun, Lei Zhu, Xiaomeng Du, Nan Wang, and Xiaomeng Huang
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-556,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-556, 2025
Revised manuscript accepted for ESSD
Short summary
Modeling biochar effects on soil organic carbon on croplands in a microbial decomposition model (MIMICS-BC_v1.0)
Mengjie Han, Qing Zhao, Xili Wang, Ying-Ping Wang, Philippe Ciais, Haicheng Zhang, Daniel S. Goll, Lei Zhu, Zhe Zhao, Zhixuan Guo, Chen Wang, Wei Zhuang, Fengchang Wu, and Wei Li
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 4871–4890, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-4871-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impacts of elevated CO2 on forest growth, mortality, and recovery in the Amazon rainforest
Yitong Yao, Philippe Ciais, Emilie Joetzjer, Wei Li, Lei Zhu, Yujie Wang, Christian Frankenberg, and Nicolas Viovy
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 763–778, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-763-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-763-2024, 2024
Short summary
Evaluating the vegetation–atmosphere coupling strength of ORCHIDEE land surface model (v7266)
Yuan Zhang, Devaraju Narayanappa, Philippe Ciais, Wei Li, Daniel Goll, Nicolas Vuichard, Martin G. De Kauwe, Laurent Li, and Fabienne Maignan
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 9111–9125, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9111-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-9111-2022, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Biogeosciences and biodiversity
Remote sensing of young leaf photosynthetic capacity in tropical and subtropical evergreen broadleaved forests
Xueqin Yang, Qingling Sun, Liusheng Han, Jie Tian, Wenping Yuan, Liyang Liu, Wei Zheng, Mei Wang, Yunpeng Wang, and Xiuzhi Chen
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 3293–3314, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3293-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3293-2025, 2025
Short summary
China's annual forest age dataset at a 30 m spatial resolution from 1986 to 2022
Rong Shang, Xudong Lin, Jing M. Chen, Yunjian Liang, Keyan Fang, Mingzhu Xu, Yulin Yan, Weimin Ju, Guirui Yu, Nianpeng He, Li Xu, Liangyun Liu, Jing Li, Wang Li, Jun Zhai, and Zhongmin Hu
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 3219–3241, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3219-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3219-2025, 2025
Short summary
CEDAR-GPP: spatiotemporally upscaled estimates of gross primary productivity incorporating CO2 fertilization
Yanghui Kang, Maoya Bassiouni, Max Gaber, Xinchen Lu, and Trevor F. Keenan
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 3009–3046, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3009-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-3009-2025, 2025
Short summary
Permafrost–wildfire interactions: active layer thickness estimates for paired burned and unburned sites in northern high latitudes
Anna C. Talucci, Michael M. Loranty, Jean E. Holloway, Brendan M. Rogers, Heather D. Alexander, Natalie Baillargeon, Jennifer L. Baltzer, Logan T. Berner, Amy Breen, Leya Brodt, Brian Buma, Jacqueline Dean, Clement J. F. Delcourt, Lucas R. Diaz, Catherine M. Dieleman, Thomas A. Douglas, Gerald V. Frost, Benjamin V. Gaglioti, Rebecca E. Hewitt, Teresa Hollingsworth, M. Torre Jorgenson, Mark J. Lara, Rachel A. Loehman, Michelle C. Mack, Kristen L. Manies, Christina Minions, Susan M. Natali, Jonathan A. O'Donnell, David Olefeldt, Alison K. Paulson, Adrian V. Rocha, Lisa B. Saperstein, Tatiana A. Shestakova, Seeta Sistla, Oleg Sizov, Andrey Soromotin, Merritt R. Turetsky, Sander Veraverbeke, and Michelle A. Walvoord
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2887–2909, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2887-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2887-2025, 2025
Short summary
Global patterns and drivers of soil dissolved organic carbon concentrations
Tianjing Ren and Andong Cai
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 2873–2885, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2873-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-2873-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Balkovič, J., Skalský, R., Folberth, C., Khabarov, N., Schmid, E., Madaras, M., Obersteiner, M., and van der Velde, M.: Impacts and Uncertainties of +2 C of Climate Change and Soil Degradation on European Crop Calorie Supply, Earth's Future, 6, 373–395, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000629, 2018. 
Beringer, T., Lucht, W., and Schaphoff, S.: Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints, GCB Bioenergy, 3, 299–312, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01088.x, 2011. 
Berndes, G., Hoogwijk, M., and Van Den Broek, R.: The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: A review of 17 studies, Biomass Bioenerg., 25, 1–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00185-X, 2003. 
Bonsch, M., Humpenöder, F., Popp, A., Bodirsky, B., Dietrich, J. P., Rolinski, S., Biewald, A., Lotze-Campen, H., Weindl, I., Gerten, D., and Stevanovic, M.: Trade-offs between land and water requirements for large-scale bioenergy production, GCB Bioenergy, 8, 11–24, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12226, 2016. 
Breiman, L.: Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324, 2001. 
Download
Short summary
We generated spatially explicit bioenergy crop yields based on field measurements with climate, soil condition and remote-sensing variables as explanatory variables and the machine-learning method. We further compared our yield maps with the maps from three integrated assessment models (IAMs; IMAGE, MAgPIE and GLOBIOM) and found that the median yields in our maps are > 50 % higher than those in the IAM maps.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint