Articles | Volume 10, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-325-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-325-2018
22 Feb 2018
 | 22 Feb 2018

The Alberta smoke plume observation study

Kerry Anderson, Al Pankratz, Curtis Mooney, and Kelly Fleetham

Related authors

The Global Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System version 1.0
Kerry Anderson, Jack Chen, Peter Englefield, Debora Griffin, Paul A. Makar, and Dan Thompson
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 7713–7749, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7713-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7713-2024, 2024
Short summary
Biomass burning CO emissions: exploring insights through TROPOMI-derived emissions and emission coefficients
Debora Griffin, Jack Chen, Kerry Anderson, Paul Makar, Chris A. McLinden, Enrico Dammers, and Andre Fogal
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 10159–10186, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10159-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-10159-2024, 2024
Short summary
Forest-fire aerosol–weather feedbacks over western North America using a high-resolution, online coupled air-quality model
Paul A. Makar, Ayodeji Akingunola, Jack Chen, Balbir Pabla, Wanmin Gong, Craig Stroud, Christopher Sioris, Kerry Anderson, Philip Cheung, Junhua Zhang, and Jason Milbrandt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 10557–10587, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10557-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10557-2021, 2021
Short summary
The FireWork v2.0 air quality forecast system with biomass burning emissions from the Canadian Forest Fire Emissions Prediction System v2.03
Jack Chen, Kerry Anderson, Radenko Pavlovic, Michael D. Moran, Peter Englefield, Dan K. Thompson, Rodrigo Munoz-Alpizar, and Hugo Landry
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3283–3310, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3283-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3283-2019, 2019
Short summary

Related subject area

Atmospheric chemistry and physics
Large synthesis of in situ field measurements of the size distribution of mineral dust aerosols across their life cycles
Paola Formenti and Claudia Di Biagio
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4995–5007, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4995-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4995-2024, 2024
Short summary
A 10 km daily-level ultraviolet-radiation-predicting dataset based on machine learning models in China from 2005 to 2020
Yichen Jiang, Su Shi, Xinyue Li, Chang Xu, Haidong Kan, Bo Hu, and Xia Meng
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4655–4672, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4655-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4655-2024, 2024
Short summary
GHOST: a globally harmonised dataset of surface atmospheric composition measurements
Dene Bowdalo, Sara Basart, Marc Guevara, Oriol Jorba, Carlos Pérez García-Pando, Monica Jaimes Palomera, Olivia Rivera Hernandez, Melissa Puchalski, David Gay, Jörg Klausen, Sergio Moreno, Stoyka Netcheva, and Oksana Tarasova
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4417–4495, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4417-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4417-2024, 2024
Short summary
Changes in air pollutant emissions in China during two clean-air action periods derived from the newly developed Inversed Emission Inventory for Chinese Air Quality (CAQIEI)
Lei Kong, Xiao Tang, Zifa Wang, Jiang Zhu, Jianjun Li, Huangjian Wu, Qizhong Wu, Huansheng Chen, Lili Zhu, Wei Wang, Bing Liu, Qian Wang, Duohong Chen, Yuepeng Pan, Jie Li, Lin Wu, and Gregory R. Carmichael
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4351–4387, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4351-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4351-2024, 2024
Short summary
Version 1 NOAA-20/OMPS Nadir Mapper total column SO2 product: continuation of NASA long-term global data record
Can Li, Nickolay A. Krotkov, Joanna Joiner, Vitali Fioletov, Chris McLinden, Debora Griffin, Peter J. T. Leonard, Simon Carn, Colin Seftor, and Alexander Vasilkov
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4291–4309, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4291-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4291-2024, 2024
Short summary

Cited articles

Achtemeier, G. L., Goodrick, S. A., Liu, Y., Garcia-Menendez, F., Hu, Y., and Odman, M. T.: Modeling smoke plume-rise and dispersion from southern United States prescribed burns with daysmoke, Atmosphere, 2, 358–388, 2011.
Anderson, K., Englefield, P., Little, J., and Reuter, G.: An approach to operational forest fire growth predictions for Canada, Int. J. Wildland Fire, 18, 893–905, https://doi.org/10.1071/WF08046, 2009.
Anderson, K., Pankratz, A., and Mooney, C.: 9.2 A thermodynamic approach to estimating smoke plume heights, in: Proceedings of Ninth Symposium on Fire and Forest Meteorology, Palms Springs, CA, 17–21 October 2011, AMS, Boston, MA, 2011.
Briggs, G.: A plume rise model compared with observations, JAPCA J. Air Waste Ma., 15, 433–438, https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1965.10468404, 1965.
Byram, G.: Combustion of forest fuels, in: Forest fire: control and use, edited by: Brown, A. A. and Davis, K. P., 61–89, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1959.
Download
Short summary
A field project was conducted to measure smoke plumes from wildland fires in Alberta. This study used handheld inclinometers and photos taken at fire lookout towers. Observations of 222 plumes were collected from 2010 to 2015.

Unanticipated issues were uncovered including instrument limitations, environmental conditions, and subjectivity of observations. Despite these problems, the data set showed responses to fire behaviour conditions consistent with processes leading to plume rise.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint