the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
State of Wildfires 2024–2025
Chantelle Burton
Francesca Di Giuseppe
Matthew W. Jones
Maria L. F. Barbosa
Esther Brambleby
Joe R. McNorton
Zhongwei Liu
Anna S. I. Bradley
Katie Blackford
Eleanor Burke
Andrew Ciavarella
Enza Di Tomaso
Jonathan Eden
Igor José M. Ferreira
Lukas Fiedler
Andrew J. Hartley
Theodore R. Keeping
Seppe Lampe
Anna Lombardi
Guilherme Mataveli
Yuquan Qu
Patrícia S. Silva
Fiona R. Spuler
Carmen B. Steinmann
Miguel Ángel Torres-Vázquez
Renata Veiga
Dave van Wees
Jakob B. Wessel
Emily Wright
Bibiana Bilbao
Mathieu Bourbonnais
Carlos M. Di Bella
Kebonye Dintwe
Victoria M. Donovan
Sarah Harris
Elena A. Kukavskaya
Aya Brigitte N'Dri
Cristina Santín
Galia Selaya
Johan Sjöström
John T. Abatzoglou
Niels Andela
Rachel Carmenta
Emilio Chuvieco
Louis Giglio
Douglas S. Hamilton
Stijn Hantson
Sarah Meier
Mark Parrington
Mojtaba Sadegh
Jesus San-Miguel-Ayanz
Fernando Sedano
Marco Turco
Guido R. van der Werf
Sander Veraverbeke
Liana O. Anderson
Hamish Clarke
Paulo M. Fernandes
Crystal A. Kolden
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 16 Oct 2025)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 15 Aug 2025)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
- RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-483', Oliver Perkins, 26 Aug 2025
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2025-483', Andrew Sullivan, 19 Sep 2025
To whom it may concern,
This paper, the second in a proposed on-going series, details the collection, modelling and analysis of global fire occurrence and burned area data, and attempts to attribute outcomes to various causes including anthropogenic climate change amongst others. It is an enormously detailed and comprehensive article. However, perhaps related to, and a consequence of, the length of the document and the level of detail and comprehensiveness, it makes for extremely heavy reading.
There is a lot of repetition in many of the sections, possibly as a result of the very large number of co-authors. These could be streamlined and reduce the effort required on the part of the reader to read it. I think it would really benefit from a careful read-through and edit by the senior authors. One suggestion I would make to improve the readability of the paper, is to start with the rather excellent conclusion. This would provide the reader with an excellent detailed overview of the paper, which is what most readers would want to get out of reading the paper, and then allow them to dig into the detail and the methods if they desire.
I have identified a number of issues and made many suggestions for the authors to consider in their revisions (see attached).
regards
Andrew Sullivan
-
RC3: 'Comment on essd-2025-483', Olivia Haas, 25 Sep 2025
This is a fantastic community effort. Apologies for the delay in reviewing this, please see attached my comments, many of which relate to comments made by previous reviewers. Happy to review this again if needed and thank you for this great piece of work!
-
AC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-483', Douglas Ian Kelley, 06 Oct 2025
We would like to sincerely thank you for your quick and thorough review of our report. We recognize that this represents a substantial amount of work, especially given the length of the report and the short notice. Your careful, constructive, and positive engagement has been invaluable in helping us improve the clarity, robustness, and overall quality of the report.
Combined responses to the RC comments are attached.
Douglas Kelley Chantelle Burton, Francesca Di Giuseppe and Matthew W. Jones (co-leads) on behalf of all co-authors.
Peer review completion


Dear authors,
Thank you for this outstanding piece of work, which I enjoyed reading and reviewing. Inevitably, in a report this long, there are some aspects that I would like revised, and hence the major corrections are a reflection of the volume of information in the report rather than its underlying value.
I have focused primarily on the human dimensions of fire & communication to non-academic audiences, in line with [what I hope are] my areas of expertise.
All best
Ol Perkins