the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
The physical and biogeochemical parameters along the coastal waters of Saudi Arabia during field surveys in summer, 2021
Yasser O. Abualnaja
James H. Churchill
Ioannis Hatzianestis
Dimitris Velaoras
Harilaos Kontoyiannis
Vassilis P. Papadopoulos
Aristomenis P. Karageorgis
Georgia Assimakopoulou
Helen Kaberi
Theodoros Kannelopoulos
Constantine Parinos
Christina Zeri
Dionysios Ballas
Elli Pitta
Vassiliki Paraskevopoulou
Afroditi Androni
Styliani Chourdaki
Vassileia Fioraki
Stylianos Iliakis
Georgia Kabouri
Angeliki Konstantinopoulou
Georgios Krokos
Dimitra Papageorgiou
Alkiviadis Papageorgiou
Georgios Pappas
Elvira Plakidi
Eleni Rousselaki
Ioanna Stavrakaki
Eleni Tzempelikou
Panagiota Zachioti
Anthi Yfanti
Theodore Zoulias
Abdulah Al Amoudi
Yasser Alshehri
Ahmad Alharbi
Hammad Al Sulami
Taha Boksmati
Rayan Mutwalli
Ibrahim Hoteit
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 04 Apr 2024)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 10 Nov 2023)
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2023-374', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Nov 2023
The data set is novel and important, especially for future investigations in the region and in other seasons. The paper is well written and adequate in length.
The data set consists of CTD data from the Red Sea taken at stations along the Saudi Arabian Coast. In Fig. 2a it is evident that depth profiles were taken. Samples analysed for nutrients and geochemical variables evidently consist only of surface samples. There should be a short note in the methods section about this: It looks like depth profiles were taken by the CTD but sampling was carried out only in surface waters. How deep did the CTD go?
In the data set from the Arabian (Persian) Gulf the question also arises whether CTD data in Figure 10 are from different depths or from different stations. The data set in the repository shows that only three samples from each sampling area were chemically analysed. This should also be noted in the methods to make things clear to the reader/user of the data set.
In general, the data are well presented and discussed with the relevant literature. The presentation of Arabian Gulf data is a bit shorter but adequate.
However, the font in the Figures needs to be enlarged to be able to read the numbers and also the location names. This refers especially to Figures 9, 11 and 12. Some of the other Figures also have slightly small fonts but they are readable. It would be good to adjust all Figures to similar fonts.
Line 641: a reference to the metal data is missing.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-374-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alexandra Pavlidou, 02 Jan 2024
Dear reviewer,
on behalf of all co-authors, I'd like to thank you for your time to review our ms and for your comments and I wish you a Happy New Year!
Regarding your comment for the fonds in the figures, all figures have been re-produced and the fonds have been enlarged in order to read the numbers and also the location names.
Regarding your commnet for the dataset, samples analysed for nutrients and geochemical variables do not consist only of surface samples. In table 1c we have provided the sampling discrete depths , which will be clearly shown in the revised table 1c. Moreover, in L 171-174 of the ms it is written: "...Water samples were taken at discrete depths, such as surface, 10 m, 20 m and near the bottom (roughly 0.5 m from the seabed), as well as from depths of particular interest (e.g., where effluent plumes were identified) if they did not match with the discrete
depths".Nutrients and geochemical variables presented in the figures are average values, as witten in the figure's legends.
Regarding CTD data, these are data of all samples taken every 1 m, which will be clearly written in the methodology part, as well as in Fig 2 and Fig, 10 legends. Moreover, CTD went 0.5m above the botton, which will be written in the methodology part.
Ref at L 641 has been added.
The ms will be modified according to your comments and suggestions.
Thank you!
Alexandra Pavlidou
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-374-AC1
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Alexandra Pavlidou, 02 Jan 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2023-374', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Jan 2024
The multidisciplinary data set here presented is relevant for environmental assessment. It can be a reference for future investigations and to check for the effectiveness of environmental protection policies. Moreover, it is particularly precious as very few data are available for these two regions. The data set is well documented with a wide description of meta-data and the paper is well organised. Bibliography is exhaustive and complete. Below some suggestions and small amendments.
-In the Introduction add some information about tidal regime in the regions; this also help for a better interpretation of ADCP currents, water column mixing and dispersion.
-Desalinization plants strongly increase local salinity. How wide can be the area affected by this very high salinity?
-Can you report about T and S average values in the open sea of Arabian Gulf, for a better comparison with the coastal observations?
-Show a map with bathymetry
-add a table with the accuracies of the CTD probes sensors
-Tab 1a and 1b -In the first row indicate Date_June 2021
-Tab 1c -Indicate that reported values are the sampling depth
-In addition to TS diagram in Fig.2 also provide 2 figures with vertical profiles of temperature and salinity
Fig.8 right (TPH) use a small-range scale e.g. 0-20 to better enhance the differences between stations
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-374-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alexandra Pavlidou, 24 Jan 2024
Dear Reviewer,
we'd like to thank you for your time to review our ms and for your comments.
We have revised the ms according to your suggestions. More specifically, in the introduction part we have added information about the tidal regime in the two regions L.74-78 and L. 98-100 in the revised ms, as well as in the Results and Discussion L 549-552 of the revised ms.
Regarding your question "Desalination plants strongly influence local salinity. How wide can be the area afected by this very high salinity?", we have added this information at L. 524-529 and 654-656 for the Red Sea and the Arabian Gulf, respectively.
Regarding your suggestion: "Can you report about T and S average values in the open sea of Arabian Gulf, for a better comparison with the coastal observations?", we have added this information at L. 648-651 in the revised ms.
A map of bathymetry is shown, as requested. Fig 1 has been replaced showing the bathymetry of the two areas.
Table 3 with accuracies of the CTD probes sensors has been added (L. 270-271).
Date June 2021 has been added in Tables 1a and 1b, whereas in Table 1c the reported sampling depth is indicated.
Figures 3 and 12 have been added showing the vertical profiles of T and S.
Fig 8 has been replaced with a small-range scale as requested.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2023-374-AC2
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Alexandra Pavlidou, 24 Jan 2024