General comments

The manuscript presented a spatiotemporally contiguous palaeovegetation cover dataset of the Tibetan Plateau since the 16ka BP, generated by the temporal and temporal random forest (RF) models using modern pollen and fossil pollen records. This is the first mapping of past vegetation on the Tibetan Plateau which should be benefit to the palae-community. I believe that the methods used in this study is feasible and the results are robust. However, given the complexity of the vegetation of the TP, this study only reconstructed two types of vegetation, woody and herb vegetation, plus the total vegetation, which were too coarse for further use. The pollen records can be transformed to multiple vegetation types on the plateau, at least for example, broadleaved forest, coniferous forest, shrubland and tundra or various alpine vegetation (alpine meadow, steppe and desert). The reviewer suggests that the authors should reconsider the classification of vegetation types as fine as possible.

Specific comments

Line 106-108, we used the MODIS Land Cover Type Product (MCD12Q1), which provides an annual Plant Functional Type (PFT) classification (DiMiceli et al., 2022). Trees were classified as "woody", while shrubs and grasses were grouped as "herbaceous." Why not keep the tree, shrub and grass PFTs? These three PFTs should be the appropriate vegetation types of the Tibetan Plateau. Otherwise, trees and shrubs should be classified as "woody", while grasses were grouped as "herbaceous."

Line 117-118, for the palaeovegetation models, we standardized all forest vegetation types in the models as woody and all grass and shrub vegetation types as herbaceous. This is not acceptable too.

How to select the past vegetation type from a fossil pollen record at 400-year interval?

For the RF-temporal models, why have only pollen and topographic factors been used? Why not add climate data? But for the RF-spatial models, all the data f climate and topography were applied.

Line 298, zhang 2024 to Zhang 2024.

This paper provides a spatio-temporally map of vegetation cover on the Tibetan Plateau. These data would be very useful for the Holocene terrestrial ecosystem studies of the Plateau.

Only a few concerns about the modern pollen dataset used in this work, which may affect the land cover prediction:

In Modern pollen dataset, some of the samples from same paper are given the same coordinates, because in some old references the authors didn’t provide precise locations of each sample. But if these samples were from mountainous area, the vegetation at each site are certainly different. How do the authors deal with these sites, will it affect the vegetation reconstruction?

Moreover, some of the sites’ coordinates are very rough, e.g. only with degree, would these represent the real localities and true vegetation type? did the author deleted these?

PS: There is still few Chinese characters in the text, i.e. line 112.