Articles | Volume 12, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1545-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1545-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description paper
| 
08 Jul 2020
Data description paper |
| 08 Jul 2020
| 08 Jul 2020
Towards harmonisation of image velocimetry techniques for river surface velocity observations
Matthew T. Perks
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Silvano Fortunato Dal Sasso
Department of European and Mediterranean Cultures: Architecture, Environment and Cultural Heritage (DiCEM), University of Basilicata, 75100 Matera, Italy
Alexandre Hauet
Electricité de France, DTG, Grenoble, France
Elizabeth Jamieson
National Hydrological Services, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Canada
Jérôme Le Coz
INRAE, UR RiverLy, River Hydraulics, Villeurbanne, France
Sophie Pearce
School of Science and the Environment, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
Salvador Peña-Haro
Photrack AG: Flow Measurements, Ankerstrasse 16a, 8004 Zürich, Switzerland
Alonso Pizarro
Department of European and Mediterranean Cultures: Architecture, Environment and Cultural Heritage (DiCEM), University of Basilicata, 75100 Matera, Italy
Dariia Strelnikova
School of Geoinformation, Carinthia University of Applied Sciences, 9524 Villach, Austria
Flavia Tauro
Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, 10003 Viterbo, Italy
James Bomhof
National Hydrological Services, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Canada
Salvatore Grimaldi
Department for Innovation in Biological, Agro-food and Forest Systems, University of Tuscia, 10003 Viterbo, Italy
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, Brooklyn, NY, 10003, USA
Alain Goulet
National Hydrological Services, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Gatineau, Canada
Borbála Hortobágyi
School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Magali Jodeau
Electricité de France, R&D, Chatou, France
LHSV, Chatou, France
Sabine Käfer
Verbund Hydro Power GmbH, 9500 Villach, Austria
Robert Ljubičić
Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade 11120, Serbia
Ian Maddock
School of Science and the Environment, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK
Peter Mayr
flussbau iC, 9500 Villach, Austria
Gernot Paulus
School of Geoinformation, Carinthia University of Applied Sciences, 9524 Villach, Austria
Lionel Pénard
INRAE, UR RiverLy, River Hydraulics, Villeurbanne, France
Leigh Sinclair
National Hydrological Services, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Nanaimo, Canada
Salvatore Manfreda
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, University of Naples Federico II, Via Claudio 21, 80125 Napoli, Italy
Related authors
Matthew T. Perks, Borbála Hortobágyi, Nick Everard, Susan Manson, Juliet Rowland, Andrew Large, and Andrew J. Russell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3727–3743, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3727-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3727-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate river flow measurements are essential for understanding river processes. This study evaluates the freely available software KLT-IV for automatic river surface velocity measurement. Analysing over 11 000 videos and comparing them with 274 traditional flow measurements, we find strong correlations (r² = 0.95–0.97) between KLT-IV and traditional methods. KLT-IV effectively estimates river flow with high accuracy, making it a valuable tool for autonomous water resource management.
Robert Ljubičić, Dariia Strelnikova, Matthew T. Perks, Anette Eltner, Salvador Peña-Haro, Alonso Pizarro, Silvano Fortunato Dal Sasso, Ulf Scherling, Pietro Vuono, and Salvatore Manfreda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5105–5132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5105-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5105-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The rise of new technologies such as drones (unmanned aerial systems – UASs) has allowed widespread use of image velocimetry techniques in place of more traditional, usually slower, methods during hydrometric campaigns. In order to minimize the velocity estimation errors, one must stabilise the acquired videos. In this research, we compare the performance of different UAS video stabilisation tools and provide guidelines for their use in videos with different flight and ground conditions.
Alonso Pizarro, Demetris Koutsoyiannis, and Alberto Montanari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 4913–4928, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4913-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4913-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We introduce the ratio of uncertainty to mutual information (RUMI), a new metric to improve rainfall-runoff simulations. RUMI better captures the link between observed and simulated stream flows by considering uncertainty at a core computation step. Tested on 99 catchments and with the GR4J model, it outperforms traditional metrics by providing more reliable and consistent results. RUMI paves the way for more accurate hydrological predictions.
Domenico Miglino, Seifeddine Jomaa, Michael Rode, Khim Cathleen Saddi, Francesco Isgrò, and Salvatore Manfreda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 4133–4151, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4133-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-4133-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Turbidity is a key factor for water quality monitoring. Here, an image-based procedure is tested in a full-scale river monitoring experiment using digital cameras. This approach can enhance our understanding of the real-time status of waterbodies, overcoming the spatial and temporal resolution limitations of existing methods. It also facilitates early-warning systems, advances water research through increased data availability and reduces operating costs.
Matthew T. Perks, Borbála Hortobágyi, Nick Everard, Susan Manson, Juliet Rowland, Andrew Large, and Andrew J. Russell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 3727–3743, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3727-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-3727-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Accurate river flow measurements are essential for understanding river processes. This study evaluates the freely available software KLT-IV for automatic river surface velocity measurement. Analysing over 11 000 videos and comparing them with 274 traditional flow measurements, we find strong correlations (r² = 0.95–0.97) between KLT-IV and traditional methods. KLT-IV effectively estimates river flow with high accuracy, making it a valuable tool for autonomous water resource management.
Christophe Cudennec, Ernest Amoussou, Yonca Cavus, Pedro L. B. Chaffe, Svenja Fischer, Salvatore Grimaldi, Jean-Marie Kileshye Onema, Mohammad Merheb, Maria-Jose Polo, Eric Servat, and Elena Volpi
Proc. IAHS, 385, 501–511, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-501-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-385-501-2025, 2025
Paolo Nasta, Günter Blöschl, Heye R. Bogena, Steffen Zacharias, Roland Baatz, Gabriëlle De Lannoy, Karsten H. Jensen, Salvatore Manfreda, Laurent Pfister, Ana M. Tarquis, Ilja van Meerveld, Marc Voltz, Yijian Zeng, William Kustas, Xin Li, Harry Vereecken, and Nunzio Romano
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 29, 465–483, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-465-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-465-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The Unsolved Problems in Hydrology (UPH) initiative has emphasized the need to establish networks of multi-decadal hydrological observatories to tackle catchment-scale challenges on a global scale. This opinion paper provocatively discusses two endmembers of possible future hydrological observatory (HO) networks for a given hypothesized community budget: a comprehensive set of moderately instrumented observatories or, alternatively, a small number of highly instrumented supersites.
Qianqian Han, Yijian Zeng, Lijie Zhang, Calimanut-Ionut Cira, Egor Prikaziuk, Ting Duan, Chao Wang, Brigitta Szabó, Salvatore Manfreda, Ruodan Zhuang, and Bob Su
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 5825–5845, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5825-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-5825-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Using machine learning, we estimated global surface soil moisture (SSM) to aid in understanding water, energy, and carbon exchange. Ensemble models outperformed individual algorithms in predicting SSM under different climates. The best-performing ensemble included K-neighbours Regressor, Random Forest Regressor, and Extreme Gradient Boosting. This is important for hydrological and climatological applications such as water cycle monitoring, irrigation management, and crop yield prediction.
Innocensia Owuor, Hartwig H. Hochmair, and Gernot Paulus
AGILE GIScience Ser., 3, 50, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-50-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-50-2022, 2022
Gernot Paulus, Dariia Strelnikova, Thomas Lutz, Karl-Heinrich Anders, Klaus Gäbler, Gerhard Lippitsch, Daniela Meier, and Stefan Eisenbach
AGILE GIScience Ser., 3, 51, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-51-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-51-2022, 2022
Stefan Ruess, Gernot Paulus, and Karl-Heinrich Anders
AGILE GIScience Ser., 3, 58, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-58-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-58-2022, 2022
Andreas Georg Wallner, Thomas Piechl, Gernot Paulus, and Karl-Heinrich Anders
AGILE GIScience Ser., 3, 67, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-67-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/agile-giss-3-67-2022, 2022
Enrico Tubaldi, Christopher J. White, Edoardo Patelli, Stergios Aristoteles Mitoulis, Gustavo de Almeida, Jim Brown, Michael Cranston, Martin Hardman, Eftychia Koursari, Rob Lamb, Hazel McDonald, Richard Mathews, Richard Newell, Alonso Pizarro, Marta Roca, and Daniele Zonta
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 795–812, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-795-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-795-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Bridges are critical infrastructure components of transport networks. A large number of these critical assets cross or are adjacent to waterways and are therefore exposed to the potentially devastating impact of floods. This paper discusses a series of issues and areas where improvements in research and practice are required in the context of risk assessment and management of bridges exposed to flood hazard, with the ultimate goal of guiding future efforts in improving bridge flood resilience.
Robert Ljubičić, Dariia Strelnikova, Matthew T. Perks, Anette Eltner, Salvador Peña-Haro, Alonso Pizarro, Silvano Fortunato Dal Sasso, Ulf Scherling, Pietro Vuono, and Salvatore Manfreda
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 5105–5132, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5105-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-5105-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The rise of new technologies such as drones (unmanned aerial systems – UASs) has allowed widespread use of image velocimetry techniques in place of more traditional, usually slower, methods during hydrometric campaigns. In order to minimize the velocity estimation errors, one must stabilise the acquired videos. In this research, we compare the performance of different UAS video stabilisation tools and provide guidelines for their use in videos with different flight and ground conditions.
Salvatore Manfreda, Domenico Miglino, and Cinzia Albertini
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4231–4242, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4231-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4231-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we introduce a new theoretically derived probability distribution of the outflows of in-line detention dams. The method may be used to evaluate the impact of detention dams on flood occurrences and attenuation of floods. This may help and support risk management planning and design.
Simone Noto, Flavia Tauro, Andrea Petroselli, Ciro Apollonio, Gianluca Botter, and Salvatore Grimaldi
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-36, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2021-36, 2021
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Although headwater observations are crucial in hydrology, monitoring ephemeral streams remains a challenge and, in turn, available data is limited. This research would like to stimulate the community to investigate on an extremely affordable approach for measuring water depth in small ephemeral streams. In this technical note, preliminary tests with a simple white-pole-wildlife-camera system demonstrate the promise of this new approach in sensing the water level in a small headwater catchment.
Cited articles
Adrian, R. J.: Scattering particle characteristics and their effect on pulsed
laser measurements of fluid flow: speckle velocimetry vs particle image
velocimetry, Appl. Opt., 23, 1690–1691, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.001690, 1984. a
Agisoft: Agisoft PhotoScan Professional Edition (version 1.1.6),
available at: https://www.agisoft.com (last access: 23 June 2020), . a
Brevis, W., Niño, Y., and Jirka, G. H.: Integrating cross-correlation and
relaxation algorithms for particle tracking velocimetry,
Exp. Fluids, 50, 135–147, 2011. a
Detert, M. and Weitbrecht, V.: A low-cost airborne velocimetry system: proof of
concept, J. Hydraul. Res., 53, 532–539,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2015.1054322, 2015. a
Detert, M., Johnson, E. D., and Weitbrecht, V.: Proof‐of‐concept for
low‐cost and noncontact synoptic airborne river flow measurements,
Int. J. Remote Sens., 38, 2780–2807,
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1294782, 2017. a, b, c
Dudderar, T. D. and Simpkins, P. G.: Laser speckle photography in a fluid
medium, Nature, 270, 45–47, https://doi.org/10.1038/270045a0,
1977. a
Fujita, I., Muste, M., and Kruger, A.: Large-scale particle image velocimetry
for flow analysis in hydraulic engineering applications, J. Hydraul.
Res., 36, 397–414, https://doi.org/10.1080/00221689809498626, 1998. a
Fujita, I., Watanabe, H., and Tsubaki, R.: Development of a non‐intrusive and
efficient flow monitoring technique: The space‐time image velocimetry
(STIV), Int. J. River Basin Manage., 5, 105–114,
https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2007.9635310, 2007. a
Harpold, A., Mostaghimi, S., Vlachos, P. P., Brannan, K., and Dillaha, T.:
Stream discharge measurement using a large-scale particle image velocimetry
(LSPIV) prototype, Trans. ASABE, 49, 1791–1805, 2006. a
Hauet, A.: Monitoring river flood using fixed image-based stations: Experience
feedback from 3 rivers in France, in: River Flow 2016: Iowa City, USA, 11–14 July 2016, edited by: Constantinescu, G., Garcia, M., and Hanes, D.,
541–547, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, available at: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=blOzDAAAQBAJ (last access: 23 June 2020), 2016. a, b
ISO 24578:2012: Hydrometry – Acoustic Doppler profiler – Method and
application for measurement of flow in open channels, Standard,
International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH, 2012. a
Le Boursicaud, R., Pénard, L., Hauet, A., Thollet, F., and Le Coz, J.: Gauging
extreme floods on YouTube: application of LSPIV to home movies for the
post-event determination of stream discharges, Hydrol. Process., 30,
90–105, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10532, 2016. a, b
Le Coz, J., Jodeau, M., Hauet, A., Marchand, B., and Le Boursicaud, R.:
Image-based velocity and discharge measurements in field and laboratory river
engineering studies using the free FUDAA-LSPIV software, Proceedings of the
International Conference on Fluvial Hydraulics, River Flow 2014,
1961–1967, 2014. a
Leitão, J. P., Peña-Haro, S., Lüthi, B., Scheidegger, A., and de Vitry,
M. M.: Urban overland runoff velocity measurement with consumer-grade
surveillance cameras and surface structure image velocimetry, J.
Hydrol., 565, 791–804,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.001, 2018. a
Lewis, Q. W. and Rhoads, B. L.: LSPIV Measurements of Two-Dimensional Flow
Structure in Streams Using Small Unmanned Aerial Systems: 1. Accuracy
Assessment Based on Comparison With Stationary Camera Platforms and In-Stream
Velocity Measurements, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8000–8018, 2018. a
Mishra, A. K. and Coulibaly, P.: Developments in hydrometric network design: A
review, Rev. Geophys., 47, RG2001, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007RG000243,
2009. a
Okamoto, K., Nishio, S., Saga, T., and Kobayashi, T.: Standard images for
particle-image velocimetry, Measure. Sci. Technol., 11, 685–691,
https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/11/6/311, 2000. a
Patalano, A., García, C. M., and Rodríguez, A.: Rectification of Image
Velocity Results (RIVeR): A simple and user-friendly toolbox for large scale
water surface Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) and Particle Tracking
Velocimetry (PTV), Comput. Geosci., 109, 323–330,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.07.009,
2017. a
Pearce, S., Ljubičić, R., Peña-Haro, S., Perks, M., Tauro, F.,
Pizarro, A., Dal Sasso, S. F., Strelnikova, D., Grimaldi, S., Maddock, I., Paulus, G., Plavšić, J., Prodanović, D., and Manfreda, S.: An Evaluation of Image Velocimetry Techniques under Low Flow
Conditions and High Seeding Densities Using Unmanned Aerial Systems, Remote
Sens., 12, 232, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12020232, 2020. a
Perks, M., Dal Sasso, S., Detert, M., Hauet, A., Jamieson, E., Le Coz, J.,
Pearce, S., Peña-Haro, S., Pizarro, A., Strelnikova, D., Tauro, F., Bomhof,
J., Grimaldi, S., Goulet, A., Hortobágyi, B., Jodeau, M., Käfer, S.,
Ljubičić, R., Maddock, I., Mayr, P., Paulus, G., Pénard, L., Sinclair, L.,
Vogel, U., and Manfreda, S.: Data on the harmonization of image velocimetry
techniques, from seven different countries, 4TU.ResearchData,
https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:014d56f7-06dd-49ad-a48c-2282ab10428e,
2020. a, b, c
Perks, M. T., Russell, A. J., and Large, A. R. G.: Technical Note: Advances in flash flood monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 4005–4015, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-4005-2016, 2016. a, b
Perks, M. T.: KLT-IV v1.0: Image velocimetry software for use with fixed and mobile platforms, Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-187, in review, 2020. a, b
Pickering, C. J. D. and Halliwell, N. A.: Laser speckle photography and
particle image velocimetry: photographic film noise, Appl. Opt., 23,
2961–2969, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.002961, 1984. a
Pizarro, A., Dal Sasso, S. F., Perks, M., and Manfreda, S.: Spatial distribution of tracers for optical sensing of stream surface flow, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-188, in review, 2020. a
Strelnikova, D., Paulus, G., Käfer, S., Anders, K.-H., Mayr, P., Mader, H.,
Scherling, U., and Schneeberger, R.: Drone-Based Optical Measurements of
Heterogeneous Surface Velocity Fields around Fish Passages at Hydropower
Dams, Remote Sens., 12, 384, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030384,
2020. a, b, c
Sveen, J. K. and Cowen, E. A.: Quantitative imaging techniques and their
application to wavy flows, Adv. Coast. Ocean Eng., PIV and Water Waves, 1–49, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812796615_0001, 2004. a
Tauro, F. and Grimaldi, S.: Ice dices for monitoring stream surface velocity,
J. Hydro-Environ. Res., 14, 143–149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2016.09.001, 2017.
a, b
Tauro, F., Porfiri, M., and Grimaldi, S.: Orienting the camera and firing
lasers to enhance large scale particle image velocimetry for streamflow
monitoring, Water Resour. Res., 50, 7470–7483,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015952, 2014. a
Tauro, F., Petroselli, A., Porfiri, M., Giandomenico, L., Bernardi, G., Mele, F., Spina, D., and Grimaldi, S.: A novel permanent gauge-cam station for surface-flow observations on the Tiber River, Geosci. Instrum. Method. Data Syst., 5, 241–251, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-5-241-2016, 2016a. a
Tauro, F., Porfiri, M., and Grimaldi, S.: Surface flow measurements from
drones, J. Hydrol., 540, 240–245,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.012, 2016b. a
Tauro, F., Piscopia, R., and Grimaldi, S.: Streamflow Observations From
Cameras: Large-Scale Particle Image Velocimetry or Particle Tracking
Velocimetry?, Water Resour. Res., 53, 10374–10394,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR020848, 2017. a, b, c, d
Tauro, F., Selker, J., van de Giesen, N., Abrate, T., Uijlenhoet, R., Porfiri,
M., Manfreda, S., Caylor, K., Moramarco, T., Benveniste, J., Ciraolo, G.,
Estes, L., Domeneghetti, A., Perks, M. T., Corbari, C., Rabiei, E.,
Ravazzani, G., Bogena, H., Harfouche, A., Brocca, L., Maltese, A., Wickert,
A., Tarpanelli, A., Good, S., Alcala, J. M. L., Petroselli, A., Cudennec, C.,
Blume, T., Hut, R., and Grimaldi, S.: Measurements and Observations in the
XXI century (MOXXI): innovation and multi-disciplinarity to sense the
hydrological cycle, Hydrol. Sci. J., 63, 169–196,
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2017.1420191, 2018a. a
Tauro, F., Tosi, F., Mattoccia, S., Toth, E., Piscopia, R., and Grimaldi, S.:
Optical Tracking Velocimetry (OTV): Leveraging Optical Flow and
Trajectory-Based Filtering for Surface Streamflow Observations, Remote
Sens., 10, 24 pp., https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10122010,
2018b. a, b
Tauro, F., Piscopia, R., and Grimaldi, S.: PTV-Stream: A simplified particle
tracking velocimetry framework for stream surface flow monitoring, CATENA,
172, 378–386, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.09.009,
2019. a
Thielicke, W. and Stamhuis, E.: PIVlab – Towards User-friendly, Affordable
and Accurate Digital Particle Image Velocimetry in MATLAB, J. Open
Res. Softw., 2, e30, https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.bl,
2014. a, b
Tsubaki, R.: LSPIV app, available at: https://sites.google.com/site/rtsubaki/lspiv-app (last access: 23 June 2020), 2018. a
Short summary
We present datasets acquired from seven countries across Europe and North America consisting of image sequences. These have been subjected to a range of pre-processing methods in preparation for image velocimetry analysis. These datasets and accompanying reference data are a resource that may be used for conducting benchmarking experiments, assessing algorithm performances, and focusing future software development.
We present datasets acquired from seven countries across Europe and North America consisting of...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint