Articles | Volume 18, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-5531-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-5531-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description article
| 
28 Jul 2026
Data description article |
| 28 Jul 2026
| 28 Jul 2026
A 40-year high-resolution gridded meteorological dataset derived from station observations in the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed
Andrew R. Hedrick
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Northwest Watershed Research Center, US Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Boise, Idaho 83702, USA
Brandon Stairs
Northwest Watershed Research Center, US Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Boise, Idaho 83702, USA
C. Jason Williams
Northwest Watershed Research Center, US Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service, Boise, Idaho 83702, USA
Joachim Meyer
Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho 83712, USA
James P. McNamara
Department of Geosciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho 83712, USA
Patrick Kormos
Idaho Snow Survey, US Department of Agriculture – Natural Resource Conservation Service, Boise, Idaho 83709, USA
Related authors
Ernesto Trujillo, Andrew Hedrick, and Danny Marks
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3736, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3736, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses 48 airborne lidar surveys and an energy balance snow model to investigate the spatial accumulation of snow water equivalent (SWE) in a large 1,180 km2 headwater catchment throughout hydrologically variable years. Results quantify the variability of the date of peak SWE storage across the basin and indicate that multiple lidar acquisitions throughout the accumulation and melt season provide the most optimal information for water supply forecasting applications.
Joachim Meyer, John Horel, Patrick Kormos, Andrew Hedrick, Ernesto Trujillo, and S. McKenzie Skiles
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 233–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Freshwater resupply from seasonal snow in the mountains is changing. Current water prediction methods from snow rely on historical data excluding the change and can lead to errors. This work presented and evaluated an alternative snow-physics-based approach. The results in a test watershed were promising, and future improvements were identified. Adaptation to current forecast environments would improve resilience to the seasonal snow changes and helps ensure the accuracy of resupply forecasts.
Leonie Kiewiet, Ernesto Trujillo, Andrew Hedrick, Scott Havens, Katherine Hale, Mark Seyfried, Stephanie Kampf, and Sarah E. Godsey
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2779–2796, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change affects precipitation phase, which can propagate into changes in streamflow timing and magnitude. This study examines how variations in rainfall and snowmelt affect discharge. We found that annual discharge and stream cessation depended on the magnitude and timing of rainfall and snowmelt and on the snowpack melt-out date. This highlights the importance of precipitation timing and emphasizes the need for spatiotemporally distributed simulations of snowpack and rainfall dynamics.
Cansu Culha, Sarah Godsey, Shawn Chartrand, Melissa Lafreniere, James McNamara, and James Kirchner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4275, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4275, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We study how Arctic rivers respond to rainfall in a warming climate. We show that runoff response can increase more than 5x under wetter conditions, and Active Layer Detachments amplify water and material runoff response to rainfall. Increasing subsurface storage can reduce runoff sensitivity to rainfall. Our results inform the flashiness of rainfall-runoff predictions based on expected weather and erosion conditions.
Ernesto Trujillo, Andrew Hedrick, and Danny Marks
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3736, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3736, 2025
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
This study uses 48 airborne lidar surveys and an energy balance snow model to investigate the spatial accumulation of snow water equivalent (SWE) in a large 1,180 km2 headwater catchment throughout hydrologically variable years. Results quantify the variability of the date of peak SWE storage across the basin and indicate that multiple lidar acquisitions throughout the accumulation and melt season provide the most optimal information for water supply forecasting applications.
Brenton A. Wilder, Joachim Meyer, Josh Enterkine, and Nancy F. Glenn
The Cryosphere, 18, 5015–5029, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5015-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-18-5015-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Remotely sensed properties of snow are dependent on accurate terrain information, which for a lot of the cryosphere and seasonal snow zones is often insufficient in accuracy. However, as we show in this paper, we can bypass this issue by optimally solving for the terrain by utilizing the raw radiance data returned to the sensor. This method performed well when compared to validation datasets and has the potential to be used across a variety of different snow climates.
Joachim Meyer, John Horel, Patrick Kormos, Andrew Hedrick, Ernesto Trujillo, and S. McKenzie Skiles
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 233–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Freshwater resupply from seasonal snow in the mountains is changing. Current water prediction methods from snow rely on historical data excluding the change and can lead to errors. This work presented and evaluated an alternative snow-physics-based approach. The results in a test watershed were promising, and future improvements were identified. Adaptation to current forecast environments would improve resilience to the seasonal snow changes and helps ensure the accuracy of resupply forecasts.
Leonie Kiewiet, Ernesto Trujillo, Andrew Hedrick, Scott Havens, Katherine Hale, Mark Seyfried, Stephanie Kampf, and Sarah E. Godsey
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2779–2796, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2779-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2779-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change affects precipitation phase, which can propagate into changes in streamflow timing and magnitude. This study examines how variations in rainfall and snowmelt affect discharge. We found that annual discharge and stream cessation depended on the magnitude and timing of rainfall and snowmelt and on the snowpack melt-out date. This highlights the importance of precipitation timing and emphasizes the need for spatiotemporally distributed simulations of snowpack and rainfall dynamics.
Cited articles
Abatzoglou, J. T.: Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling, Int. J. Climatol., 33, 121–131, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3413, 2013.
Bárdossy, A., Kilsby, C., Birkinshaw, S., Wang, N., and Anwar, F.: Is Precipitation Responsible for the Most Hydrological Model Uncertainty? Front. Water, 4, https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2022.836554, 2022.
Brun, E., Martin, E., Simon, V., Gendre, C., and Coleou, C.: An Energy and Mass Model of Snow Cover Suitable for Operational Avalanche Forecasting, J. Glaciol., 35, 333–342, https://doi.org/10.3189/s0022143000009254, 1989.
Brutsaert, W.: On a derivable formula for long-wave radiation from clear skies, Water Resour. Res., 11, 742–744, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR011i005p00742, 1975.
Campbell, G. S. and Norman, J. M.: An Introduction To Environmental Biophysics, in: 2nd Edn., Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-94937-6, 1998.
Daly, C., Neilson, R. P., and Phillips, D. L.: A Statistical-Topographic Model for Mapping Climatological Precipitation over Mountainous Terrain, J. Appl. Meteorol., 33, 140–158, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033<0140:ASTMFM>2.0.CO;2., 1994.
Dozier, J.: A clear-sky spectral solar radiation model for snow-covered mountainous terrain, Water Resour. Res., 16, 709–718, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR016i004p00709, 1980.
Dubayah, R. C.: Modeling a solar radiation topoclimatology for the Rio Grande River Basin, J. Veg. Sci., 5, 627–640, https://doi.org/10.2307/3235879, 1994.
Fall, G., Kitzmiller, D., Pavlovic, S., Zhang, Z., Patrick, N., St. Laurent, M., Trypaluk, C., Wu, W., and Miller, D.: The Office of Water Prediction's Analysis of Record for Calibration, version 1.1: Dataset description and precipitation evaluation, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 59, 1246–1272, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.13143, 2023.
Garen, D. C. and Marks, D.: Spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt modelling in a mountainous river basin: estimation of meteorological inputs and verification of model results, J. Hydrol., 315, 126–153, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.03.026, 2005.
Garen, D. C., Johnson, G. L., and Hanson, C. L.: Mean Areal Precipitation for Daily Hydrologic Modeling in Mountainous Regions, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 30, 481–491, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1994.tb03307.x, 1994.
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017.
Godsey, S. E., Marks, D., Kormos, P. R., Seyfried, M. S., Enslin, C. L., Winstral, A. H., McNamara, J. P., and Link, T. E.: Eleven years of mountain weather, snow, soil moisture and streamflow data from the rain–snow transition zone – the Johnston Draw catchment, Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed and Critical Zone Observatory, USA, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10(3), 1207–1216, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1207-2018, 2018.
Gueymard, C. A.: Cloud and albedo enhancement impacts on solar irradiance using high-frequency measurements from thermopile and photodiode radiometers. Part 1: Impacts on global horizontal irradiance, Solar Energy, 153, 755–765, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.05.004, 2017.
Hamon, W. R. and Cox, L. M.: Measurement of atmospheric and ground level precipitation, Water Resour. Res., 8, 272–272, https://doi.org/10.1029/WR008i001p00272-01, 1972.
Hanson, C. L.: Long-Term Precipitation Database, Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, United States, Water Resour. Res., 37, 2831–2834, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR000415, 2001.
Hanson, C. L., Pierson, F. B., and Johnson, G. L.: Dual-Gauge System for Measuring Precipitation: Historical Development and Use, J. Hydrol. Eng., 9, 350–359, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2004)9:5(350), 2004.
Havens, S., Marks, D., Kormos, P. R., and Hedrick, A. R.: Spatial Modeling for Resources Framework (SMRF): A modular framework for developing spatial forcing data for snow modeling in mountain basins, Comput. Geosci., 109, 295–304, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.08.016, 2017.
Hedrick, A. R., Marks, D., Havens, S., Robertson, M., Johnson, M., Sandusky, M., Marshall, H. P., Kormos, P. R., Bormann, K. J., and Painter, T. H.: Direct Insertion of NASA Airborne Snow Observatory‐Derived Snow Depth Time Series Into the iSnobal Energy Balance Snow Model, Water Resour. Res., 54, 8045–8063, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023190, 2018.
Hedrick, A. R., Stairs, B., Williams, C. J., Meyer, J., and McNamara, J. P.: The Reynolds Creek Long-Term Dataset: A long-term meteorological dataset derived from station observations in the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Ag Data Commons, United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library [data set], https://doi.org/10.15482/USDA.ADC/30199954, 2025.
Kochendorfer, J., Nitu, R., Wolff, M., Mekis, E., Rasmussen, R., Baker, B., Earle, M. E., Reverdin, A., Wong, K., Smith, C. D., Yang, D., Roulet, Y.-A., Meyers, T., Buisan, S., Isaksen, K., Brækkan, R., Landolt, S., and Jachcik, A.: Testing and development of transfer functions for weighing precipitation gauges in WMO-SPICE, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 1437–1452, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1437-2018, 2018.
Kormos, P. R., Marks, D., Seyfried, M. S., Havens, S. C., Hedrick, A. R., Lohse, K. A., Sandusky, M., Kahl, A., and Garen, D.: 31 years of hourly spatially distributed air temperature, humidity, and precipitation amount and phase from Reynolds Critical Zone Observatory, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 1197–1205, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1197-2018, 2018.
LANDFIRE: Existing Vegetation Type Layer, LANDFIRE 2.0.0, https://www.landfire.gov/viewer (last access: 22 July 2026), 2016.
Lehning, M., Völksch, I., Gustafsson, D., Nguyen, T. A., Stähli, M., and Zappa, M.: ALPINE3D: A detailed model of mountain surface processes and its application to snow hydrology, Hydrol. Process., 20, 2111–2128, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6204, 2006.
Link, T. E. and Marks, D.: Distributed simulation of snowcover mass- and energy-balance in the boreal forest, Hydrol. Process., 13, 2439–2452, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199910)13:14/15<2439::AID-HYP866>3.0.CO;2-1, 1999.
Liston, G. E. and Elder, K. J.: A Distributed Snow-Evolution Modeling System (SnowModel), J. Hydrometeorol., 7, 1259–1276, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM548.1, 2006.
Marks, D. and Dozier, J.: A clear-sky longwave radiation model for remote alpine areas, Arch. Meteorol. Geophysi. Bioklimatol. B, 27, 159–187, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02243741, 1979.
Marks, D., Domingo, J., Susong, D., Link, T., and Garen, D.: A spatially distributed energy balance snowmelt model for application in mountain basins, Hydrol. Process., 13, 1935–1959, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199909)13:12/13<1935::AID-HYP868>3.0.CO;2-C, 1999.
Marks, D., Winstral, A., Reba, M., Pomeroy, J., and Kumar, M.: An evaluation of methods for determining during-storm precipitation phase and the rain/snow transition elevation at the surface in a mountain basin, Adv. Water Resour., 55, 98–110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.11.012, 2013.
Marshall, S. E. and Warren, S. G.: Parameterization of snow albedo for climate models, in: Large-scale effects of seasonal snow cover, edited by: Goodison, B. E., Barry, R. G., and Dozier, J. E., International Association of Hydrological Sciences Publication 166, Wallingford: IAHS Press, 43–50, 1987.
McCabe, G. J. and Clark, M. P.: Trends and Variability in Snowmelt Runoff in the Western United States, J. Hydrometeorol., 6, 476–482, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM428.1, 2005.
Meyer, J., Horel, J., Kormos, P., Hedrick, A., Trujillo, E., and Skiles, S. M.: Operational water forecast ability of the HRRR-iSnobal combination: an evaluation to adapt into production environments, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 233–250, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-233-2023, 2023.
Meyer, J., Robledano, A., Hu, M., Wilder, B., Ammatelli, J., Hedrick, A., Kormos, P., Ragar, D., Havens, S., Johnson, M., and Sandusky, M.: iSnobal/smrf: RCLT (Version 20250926), Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21514687, 2025.
Miles, A., Kirkham, J. A., Bussonnier, M., Moore, J., Papadopoulos Orfanos, D., Bourbeau, J., Fulton, A., Lee, G., Patel, Z., Bennett, D., Rocklin, M., Awa, B., Chopra, S., Abernathey, R., Kristensen, M. R. B., de Andrade, E. S., Durant, M., Schut, V., Dussin, R., Verma, S., Chaudhary, S., Barnes, C., Hamman, J., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Williams, B., Mohar, B., Noyes, C., and Bolarinwa., E.: zarr-developers/zarr-python: v2.15.0, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8039103, 2023.
Monteiro, D. and Morin, S.: Multi-decadal analysis of past winter temperature, precipitation and snow cover data in the European Alps from reanalyses, climate models and observational datasets, The Cryosphere, 17, 3617–3660, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3617-2023, 2023.
Morin, S., Horton, S., Techel, F., Bavay, M., Coléou, C., Fierz, C., Gobiet, A., Hagenmuller, P., Lafaysse, M., Ližar, M., Mitterer, C., Monti, F., Müller, K., Olefs, M., Snook, J. S., van Herwijnen, A., and Vionnet, V.: Application of physical snowpack models in support of operational avalanche hazard forecasting: A status report on current implementations and prospects for the future, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 170, 102910, doi10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.102910, 2020.
Mote, P. W., Hamlet, A. F., Clark, M. P., and Lettenmaier, D. P.: Declining mountain snowpack in western north America, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 39–49, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-86-1-39, 2005.
Mott, R., Winstral, A., Cluzet, B., Helbig, N., Magnusson, J., Mazzotti, G., Quéno, L., Schirmer, M., Webster, C., and Jonas, T.: Operational snow-hydrological modeling for Switzerland, Front. Earth Sci., 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1228158, 2023.
Raleigh, M. S., Lundquist, J. D., and Clark, M. P.: Exploring the impact of forcing error characteristics on physically based snow simulations within a global sensitivity analysis framework, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 3153–3179, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3153-2015, 2015.
Rasmussen, R. M., Chen, F., Liu, C., Ikeda, K., Prein, A., Kim, J., Schneider, T., Dai, A., Gochis, D., Dugger, A., Zhang, Y., Jaye, A., Dudhia, J., He, C., Harrold, M., Xue, L., Chen, S., Newman, A., Dougherty, E., Abolafia-Rosenzweig, R., Lybarger, N. D., Viger, R., Lesmes, D., Skalak, K., Brakebill, J., Cline, D., Dunne, K., Rasmussen, K., and Miguez-Macho, G.: CONUS404: The NCAR–USGS 4-km Long-Term Regional Hydroclimate Reanalysis over the CONUS, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 104, E1382–E1408, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0326.1, 2023.
Reba, M. L., Marks, D., Seyfried, M., Winstral, A., Kumar, M., and Flerchinger, G.: A long-term data set for hydrologic modeling in a snow-dominated mountain catchment, Water Resour. Res., 47, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR010030, 2011.
Serreze, M. C., Clark, M. P., Armstrong, R. L., McGinnis, D. A., and Pulwarty, R. S.: Characteristics of the western United States snowpack from snowpack telemetry (SNOTEL) data, Water Resour. Res., 35, 2145–2160, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999wr900090, 1999.
Skamarock, W. C., Klemp, J., B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D. O., Liu, Z., Berner, J., Wang, W., Powers, J., Duda, M. G., Barker, D. M., and Huang, X.-Y.: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Model Version 4.3, UCAR, https://doi.org/10.5065/1dfh-6p97, 2021.
Slaughter, C. W., Marks, D., Flerchinger, G. N., Van Vactor, S. S., and Burgess, M.: Thirty‐five years of research data collection at the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, Idaho, United States, Water Resour. Res., 37, 2819–2823, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001wr000413, 2001.
Stewart, I., Cayan, D. R., and Dettinger, M.: Changes toward Earlier Streamflow Timing across Western North America, J. Climate, 18, 1136–1155, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3321.1, 2005.
Susong, D., Marks, D., and Garen, D.: Methods for developing time-series climate surfaces to drive topographically distributed energy- and water-balance models, Hydrol. Process., 13, 2003–2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199909)13:12/13<2003::AID-HYP884>3.0.CO;2-K, 1999.
Thériault, J. M., Leroux, N. R., and Rasmussen, R. M.: Improvement of Solid Precipitation Measurements Using a Hotplate Precipitation Gauge, J. Hydrometeorol., 22, 877–885, https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-20-0168.1, 2021.
Trujillo, E. and Molotch, N. P.: Snowpack regimes of the Western United States, Water Resour. Res., 50, 5611–5623, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014753, 2014.
Voordendag, A., Réveillet, M., MacDonell, S., and Lhermitte, S.: Snow model comparison to simulate snow depth evolution and sublimation at point scale in the semi-arid Andes of Chile, The Cryosphere, 15, 4241–4259, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-4241-2021, 2021.
Winstral, A., Elder, K., Davis, R. E.: Spatial Snow Modeling of Wind-Redistributed Snow Using Terrain-Based Parameters, J. Hydrometeorol., 3, 524–538, https://doi.org/10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0524:SSMOWR>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Winstral, A., Marks, D., and Gurney, R.: An efficient method for distributing wind speeds over heterogenous terrain, Hydrol. Process., 23, 2526–2535, https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7141, 2009.
Xia, Y., Mitchell, K., Ek, M., Sheffield, J., Cosgrove, B., Wood, E., Luo, L., Alonge, C., Wei, H., Meng, J., Livneh, B., Lettenmaier, D., Koren, V., Duan, Q., Mo, K., Fan, Y., and Mocko, D.: Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D03109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016048, 2012.
Zeng, X., Broxton, P., and Dawson, N.: Snowpack Change From 1982 to 2016 Over Conterminous United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 12940–12947, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079621, 2018.
Short summary
This dataset provides hourly gridded estimates of meteorologic variables based on station observations between 1984 and 2023 in the Reynolds Creek Experimental Watershed, including air temperature, humidity, wind, incoming solar radiation, and precipitation. This dataset exists as a resource for energy balance modeling and independent validation of atmospheric reanalysis datasets and is publicly available in a cloud-optimized format at the Ag Data Commons data repository.
This dataset provides hourly gridded estimates of meteorologic variables based on station...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint