Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-963-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-963-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description paper
| 
07 Mar 2023
Data description paper |
| 07 Mar 2023
| 07 Mar 2023
National CO2 budgets (2015–2020) inferred from atmospheric CO2 observations in support of the global stocktake
Brendan Byrne
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
David F. Baker
Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Sourish Basu
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, College Park, MD, USA
Michael Bertolacci
School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Kevin W. Bowman
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Dustin Carroll
Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, San José State University, Moss Landing, CA, USA
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Abhishek Chatterjee
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Frédéric Chevallier
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de L'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Philippe Ciais
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de L'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Noel Cressie
School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
David Crisp
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Sean Crowell
GeoCarb Mission Collaboration, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
Feng Deng
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Nicholas M. Deutscher
Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Manvendra K. Dubey
Earth System Observation, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
Omaira E. García
Izaña Atmospheric Research Center (IARC), State Meteorological Agency of Spain (AEMet), Tenerife, Spain
David W. T. Griffith
Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Benedikt Herkommer
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK-ASF), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Andrew R. Jacobson
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
Rajesh Janardanan
Satellite Observation Center, Earth System Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
Sujong Jeong
Department of Environmental Planning, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Matthew S. Johnson
Earth Science Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA
Dylan B. A. Jones
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Rigel Kivi
Space and Earth Observation Centre, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Sodankylä, Finland
Junjie Liu
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Zhiqiang Liu
Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences & Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Shamil Maksyutov
Satellite Observation Center, Earth System Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
John B. Miller
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Scot M. Miller
Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Isamu Morino
Satellite Observation Center, Earth System Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
Justus Notholt
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Tomohiro Oda
Earth from Space Institute, Universities Space Research Association, Washington, D.C., USA
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Christopher W. O'Dell
Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Young-Suk Oh
Global Atmosphere Watch Team, Climate Research Department, National Institute of Meteorological Sciences, Seogwipo-si, Jeju-do, Republic of Korea
Hirofumi Ohyama
Satellite Observation Center, Earth System Division, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
Prabir K. Patra
Research Institute for Global Change, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan
Hélène Peiro
GeoCarb Mission Collaboration, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
Christof Petri
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Sajeev Philip
Centre for Atmospheric Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
David F. Pollard
National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research Ltd (NIWA), Lauder, New Zealand
Benjamin Poulter
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Marine Remaud
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de L'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
Andrew Schuh
Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
Mahesh K. Sha
Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Brussels, Belgium
Kei Shiomi
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Tsukuba, Japan
Kimberly Strong
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Colm Sweeney
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA
Laboratoire d'Etudes du Rayonnement et de la Matière en Astrophysique et Atmosphères (LERMA-IPSL), Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Université, 75005 Paris, France
Hanqin Tian
International Center for Climate and Global Change Research, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society, and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
Voltaire A. Velazco
Centre for Atmospheric Chemistry, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD), Hohenpeissenberg, Germany
Mihalis Vrekoussis
Climate and Atmosphere Research Center (CARE-C), The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Thorsten Warneke
Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
John R. Worden
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Debra Wunch
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Yuanzhi Yao
International Center for Climate and Global Change Research, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Jeongmin Yun
Department of Environmental Planning, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Andrew Zammit-Mangion
School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
Ning Zeng
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, College Park, MD, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 18,146 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jul 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14,792 | 3,158 | 196 | 18,146 | 882 | 186 | 221 |
- HTML: 14,792
- PDF: 3,158
- XML: 196
- Total: 18,146
- Supplement: 882
- BibTeX: 186
- EndNote: 221
Total article views: 15,584 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 Mar 2023)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13,122 | 2,296 | 166 | 15,584 | 730 | 154 | 192 |
- HTML: 13,122
- PDF: 2,296
- XML: 166
- Total: 15,584
- Supplement: 730
- BibTeX: 154
- EndNote: 192
Total article views: 2,562 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jul 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,670 | 862 | 30 | 2,562 | 152 | 32 | 29 |
- HTML: 1,670
- PDF: 862
- XML: 30
- Total: 2,562
- Supplement: 152
- BibTeX: 32
- EndNote: 29
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 18,146 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 17,605 with geography defined
and 541 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 15,584 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 15,223 with geography defined
and 361 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,562 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,382 with geography defined
and 180 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
49 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Improved Constraints on the Recent Terrestrial Carbon Sink Over China by Assimilating OCO‐2 XCO2 Retrievals W. He et al. 10.1029/2022JD037773
- Satellite-detected large CO2 release in southwestern North America during the 2020–2021 drought and associated wildfires H. Chen et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad3cf7
- Carbon emissions from the 2023 Canadian wildfires B. Byrne et al. 10.1038/s41586-024-07878-z
- The importance of digital elevation model accuracy in XCO2 retrievals: improving the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 Atmospheric Carbon Observations from Space version 11 retrieval product N. Jacobs et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1375-2024
- Assumptions about prior fossil fuel inventories impact our ability to estimate posterior net CO2 fluxes that are needed for verifying national inventories T. Oda et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad059b
- A Review of Satellite-Based CO2 Data Reconstruction Studies: Methodologies, Challenges, and Advances K. Hu et al. 10.3390/rs16203818
- Evaluating the consistency between OCO-2 and OCO-3 XCO2 estimates derived from the NASA ACOS version 10 retrieval algorithm T. Taylor et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3173-2023
- Weaker regional carbon uptake albeit with stronger seasonal amplitude in northern mid-latitudes estimated by higher resolution GEOS-Chem model Z. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169477
- Neutral Tropical African CO2 Exchange Estimated From Aircraft and Satellite Observations B. Gaubert et al. 10.1029/2023GB007804
- A Comprehensive Assessment of Anthropogenic and Natural Sources and Sinks of Australasia's Carbon Budget Y. Villalobos et al. 10.1029/2023GB007845
- Potential of Lightweight Drones and Object-Oriented Image Segmentation in Forest Plantation Assessment J. Dixit et al. 10.3390/rs16091554
- Multiscale assessment of North American terrestrial carbon balance K. Foster et al. 10.5194/bg-21-869-2024
- Balance of Anthropogenic and Natural Greenhouse Gas Fluxes of All Inland Ecosystems of the Russian Federation and the Contribution of Sequestration in Forests A. Romanovskaya & V. Korotkov 10.3390/f15040707
- A new global carbon flux estimation methodology by assimilation of both in situ and satellite CO2 observations W. Su et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00824-w
- Technical note: Posterior uncertainty estimation via a Monte Carlo procedure specialized for 4D-Var data assimilation M. Stanley et al. 10.5194/acp-24-9419-2024
- Editorial: Finding paths to net-zero carbon in climate-smart food systems E. Viglizzo et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1322803
- Impact of the horizontal resolution of GEOS-Chem on land‒ocean and tropic‒extratropic partitioning and seasonal cycle in CO2 inversion Z. Liu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad7870
- Modelling changes in vegetation productivity and carbon balance under future climate scenarios in southeastern Australia B. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171748
- The Total Carbon Column Observing Network's GGG2020 data version J. Laughner et al. 10.5194/essd-16-2197-2024
- Verifying Methane Inventories and Trends With Atmospheric Methane Data J. Worden et al. 10.1029/2023AV000871
- Toward monitoring daily anthropogenic CO2 emissions with air pollution sensors from space H. Li & B. Zheng 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.019
- A global surface CO2 flux dataset (2015–2022) inferred from OCO-2 retrievals using the GONGGA inversion system Z. Jin et al. 10.5194/essd-16-2857-2024
- A novel geospatial machine learning approach to quantify non-linear effects of land use/land cover change (LULCC) on carbon dynamics J. Kang et al. 10.1016/j.jag.2024.103712
- Variation Patterns of CO2 and CH4 according to the Measurements in the Surface Atmosphere over Urban and Suburban Areas in 2021–2022 K. Antonov et al. 10.3103/S1068373924050091
- Hybrid Projection Methods for Solution Decomposition in Large-Scale Bayesian Inverse Problems J. Chung et al. 10.1137/22M1502197
- Increased Terrestrial Carbon Export and CO2 Evasion From Global Inland Waters Since the Preindustrial Era H. Tian et al. 10.1029/2023GB007776
- A Greenhouse Gas Budget for Mexico During 2000–2019 G. Murray‐Tortarolo et al. 10.1029/2023JG007667
- Spatio-temporal variation of atmospheric CO2 and its association with anthropogenic, vegetation, and climate indices over the state of Bihar, India A. Dass et al. 10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100513
- Improved estimates of net ecosystem exchanges in mega-countries using GOSAT and OCO-2 observations L. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01910-w
- Do State‐Of‐The‐Art Atmospheric CO2 Inverse Models Capture Drought Impacts on the European Land Carbon Uptake? W. He et al. 10.1029/2022MS003150
- Development of the tangent linear and adjoint models of the global online chemical transport model MPAS-CO2 v7.3 T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1543-2024
- Quantifying and mapping the supply-demand for carbon sequestration by urban green infrastructures: Evidence from Hamadan Urban Area, Iran S. Gharibi & K. Shayesteh 10.1007/s10668-024-05305-x
- X-BASE: the first terrestrial carbon and water flux products from an extended data-driven scaling framework, FLUXCOM-X J. Nelson et al. 10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024
- Improving Satellite XCO₂ Measurements Accuracy: A Bayesian Bias Correction Approach Considering Spatiotemporal Bias Characteristics R. Li et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3483776
- A top-down estimation of subnational CO2 budget using a global high-resolution inverse model with data from regional surface networks L. Nayagam et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad0f74
- Multi-sensor integrated mapping of global XCO2 from 2015 to 2021 with a local random forest model J. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.01.009
- The key role of forest disturbance in reconciling estimates of the northern carbon sink M. O’Sullivan et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01827-4
- Solar‐Induced Fluorescence Helps Constrain Global Patterns in Net Biosphere Exchange, as Estimated Using Atmospheric CO2 Observations M. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2023JG007703
- Extreme solar storms and the quest for exact dating with radiocarbon T. Heaton et al. 10.1038/s41586-024-07679-4
- Verifying national inventory-based combustion emissions of CO2 across the UK and mainland Europe using satellite observations of atmospheric CO and CO2 T. Scarpelli et al. 10.5194/acp-24-10773-2024
- The Greenhouse gas Observations of Biospheric and Local Emissions from the Upper sky (GOBLEU): a mission overview, instrument description, and results from the first flight H. Suto et al. 10.1186/s13021-024-00273-1
- Soil respiration–driven CO 2 pulses dominate Australia’s flux variability E. Metz et al. 10.1126/science.add7833
- The reduced net carbon uptake over Northern Hemisphere land causes the close-to-normal CO 2 growth rate in 2021 La Niña J. Liu et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adl2201
- Optimal design of surface CO2 observation network to constrain China’s land carbon sink Y. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.scib.2023.07.010
- Characterizing and communicating uncertainty: lessons from NASA’s Carbon Monitoring System R. Kennedy et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad8be0
- Biome-scale temperature sensitivity of ecosystem respiration revealed by atmospheric CO2 observations W. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41559-023-02093-x
- Monitoring fossil fuel CO2 emissions from co-emitted NO2 observed from space: progress, challenges, and future perspectives H. Li et al. 10.1007/s11783-025-1922-x
- Progress and challenges in remotely sensed terrestrial carbon fluxes T. Wang et al. 10.1080/10095020.2024.2336599
- Assumptions about prior fossil fuel inventories impact our ability to estimate posterior net CO2 fluxes that are needed for verifying national inventories T. Oda et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad059b
48 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Improved Constraints on the Recent Terrestrial Carbon Sink Over China by Assimilating OCO‐2 XCO2 Retrievals W. He et al. 10.1029/2022JD037773
- Satellite-detected large CO2 release in southwestern North America during the 2020–2021 drought and associated wildfires H. Chen et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad3cf7
- Carbon emissions from the 2023 Canadian wildfires B. Byrne et al. 10.1038/s41586-024-07878-z
- The importance of digital elevation model accuracy in XCO2 retrievals: improving the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 Atmospheric Carbon Observations from Space version 11 retrieval product N. Jacobs et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1375-2024
- Assumptions about prior fossil fuel inventories impact our ability to estimate posterior net CO2 fluxes that are needed for verifying national inventories T. Oda et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad059b
- A Review of Satellite-Based CO2 Data Reconstruction Studies: Methodologies, Challenges, and Advances K. Hu et al. 10.3390/rs16203818
- Evaluating the consistency between OCO-2 and OCO-3 XCO2 estimates derived from the NASA ACOS version 10 retrieval algorithm T. Taylor et al. 10.5194/amt-16-3173-2023
- Weaker regional carbon uptake albeit with stronger seasonal amplitude in northern mid-latitudes estimated by higher resolution GEOS-Chem model Z. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169477
- Neutral Tropical African CO2 Exchange Estimated From Aircraft and Satellite Observations B. Gaubert et al. 10.1029/2023GB007804
- A Comprehensive Assessment of Anthropogenic and Natural Sources and Sinks of Australasia's Carbon Budget Y. Villalobos et al. 10.1029/2023GB007845
- Potential of Lightweight Drones and Object-Oriented Image Segmentation in Forest Plantation Assessment J. Dixit et al. 10.3390/rs16091554
- Multiscale assessment of North American terrestrial carbon balance K. Foster et al. 10.5194/bg-21-869-2024
- Balance of Anthropogenic and Natural Greenhouse Gas Fluxes of All Inland Ecosystems of the Russian Federation and the Contribution of Sequestration in Forests A. Romanovskaya & V. Korotkov 10.3390/f15040707
- A new global carbon flux estimation methodology by assimilation of both in situ and satellite CO2 observations W. Su et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00824-w
- Technical note: Posterior uncertainty estimation via a Monte Carlo procedure specialized for 4D-Var data assimilation M. Stanley et al. 10.5194/acp-24-9419-2024
- Editorial: Finding paths to net-zero carbon in climate-smart food systems E. Viglizzo et al. 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1322803
- Impact of the horizontal resolution of GEOS-Chem on land‒ocean and tropic‒extratropic partitioning and seasonal cycle in CO2 inversion Z. Liu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad7870
- Modelling changes in vegetation productivity and carbon balance under future climate scenarios in southeastern Australia B. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171748
- The Total Carbon Column Observing Network's GGG2020 data version J. Laughner et al. 10.5194/essd-16-2197-2024
- Verifying Methane Inventories and Trends With Atmospheric Methane Data J. Worden et al. 10.1029/2023AV000871
- Toward monitoring daily anthropogenic CO2 emissions with air pollution sensors from space H. Li & B. Zheng 10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.019
- A global surface CO2 flux dataset (2015–2022) inferred from OCO-2 retrievals using the GONGGA inversion system Z. Jin et al. 10.5194/essd-16-2857-2024
- A novel geospatial machine learning approach to quantify non-linear effects of land use/land cover change (LULCC) on carbon dynamics J. Kang et al. 10.1016/j.jag.2024.103712
- Variation Patterns of CO2 and CH4 according to the Measurements in the Surface Atmosphere over Urban and Suburban Areas in 2021–2022 K. Antonov et al. 10.3103/S1068373924050091
- Hybrid Projection Methods for Solution Decomposition in Large-Scale Bayesian Inverse Problems J. Chung et al. 10.1137/22M1502197
- Increased Terrestrial Carbon Export and CO2 Evasion From Global Inland Waters Since the Preindustrial Era H. Tian et al. 10.1029/2023GB007776
- A Greenhouse Gas Budget for Mexico During 2000–2019 G. Murray‐Tortarolo et al. 10.1029/2023JG007667
- Spatio-temporal variation of atmospheric CO2 and its association with anthropogenic, vegetation, and climate indices over the state of Bihar, India A. Dass et al. 10.1016/j.envadv.2024.100513
- Improved estimates of net ecosystem exchanges in mega-countries using GOSAT and OCO-2 observations L. Zhang et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01910-w
- Do State‐Of‐The‐Art Atmospheric CO2 Inverse Models Capture Drought Impacts on the European Land Carbon Uptake? W. He et al. 10.1029/2022MS003150
- Development of the tangent linear and adjoint models of the global online chemical transport model MPAS-CO2 v7.3 T. Zheng et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-1543-2024
- Quantifying and mapping the supply-demand for carbon sequestration by urban green infrastructures: Evidence from Hamadan Urban Area, Iran S. Gharibi & K. Shayesteh 10.1007/s10668-024-05305-x
- X-BASE: the first terrestrial carbon and water flux products from an extended data-driven scaling framework, FLUXCOM-X J. Nelson et al. 10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024
- Improving Satellite XCO₂ Measurements Accuracy: A Bayesian Bias Correction Approach Considering Spatiotemporal Bias Characteristics R. Li et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2024.3483776
- A top-down estimation of subnational CO2 budget using a global high-resolution inverse model with data from regional surface networks L. Nayagam et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad0f74
- Multi-sensor integrated mapping of global XCO2 from 2015 to 2021 with a local random forest model J. Chen et al. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2024.01.009
- The key role of forest disturbance in reconciling estimates of the northern carbon sink M. O’Sullivan et al. 10.1038/s43247-024-01827-4
- Solar‐Induced Fluorescence Helps Constrain Global Patterns in Net Biosphere Exchange, as Estimated Using Atmospheric CO2 Observations M. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2023JG007703
- Extreme solar storms and the quest for exact dating with radiocarbon T. Heaton et al. 10.1038/s41586-024-07679-4
- Verifying national inventory-based combustion emissions of CO2 across the UK and mainland Europe using satellite observations of atmospheric CO and CO2 T. Scarpelli et al. 10.5194/acp-24-10773-2024
- The Greenhouse gas Observations of Biospheric and Local Emissions from the Upper sky (GOBLEU): a mission overview, instrument description, and results from the first flight H. Suto et al. 10.1186/s13021-024-00273-1
- Soil respiration–driven CO 2 pulses dominate Australia’s flux variability E. Metz et al. 10.1126/science.add7833
- The reduced net carbon uptake over Northern Hemisphere land causes the close-to-normal CO 2 growth rate in 2021 La Niña J. Liu et al. 10.1126/sciadv.adl2201
- Optimal design of surface CO2 observation network to constrain China’s land carbon sink Y. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.scib.2023.07.010
- Characterizing and communicating uncertainty: lessons from NASA’s Carbon Monitoring System R. Kennedy et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ad8be0
- Biome-scale temperature sensitivity of ecosystem respiration revealed by atmospheric CO2 observations W. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41559-023-02093-x
- Monitoring fossil fuel CO2 emissions from co-emitted NO2 observed from space: progress, challenges, and future perspectives H. Li et al. 10.1007/s11783-025-1922-x
- Progress and challenges in remotely sensed terrestrial carbon fluxes T. Wang et al. 10.1080/10095020.2024.2336599
Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Short summary
Changes in the carbon stocks of terrestrial ecosystems result in emissions and removals of CO2. These can be driven by anthropogenic activities (e.g., deforestation), natural processes (e.g., fires) or in response to rising CO2 (e.g., CO2 fertilization). This paper describes a dataset of CO2 emissions and removals derived from atmospheric CO2 observations. This pilot dataset informs current capabilities and future developments towards top-down monitoring and verification systems.
Changes in the carbon stocks of terrestrial ecosystems result in emissions and removals of CO2....
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint