Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Tiexi Chen
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Shijie Li
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Daniel Fiifi Tawia Hagan
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tshinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Buda Su
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Viewed
Total article views: 7,990 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
6,241
1,603
146
7,990
230
141
197
HTML: 6,241
PDF: 1,603
XML: 146
Total: 7,990
Supplement: 230
BibTeX: 141
EndNote: 197
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Total article views: 6,241 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
5,156
976
109
6,241
230
123
168
HTML: 5,156
PDF: 976
XML: 109
Total: 6,241
Supplement: 230
BibTeX: 123
EndNote: 168
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Dec 2021)
Total article views: 1,749 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,085
627
37
1,749
18
29
HTML: 1,085
PDF: 627
XML: 37
Total: 1,749
BibTeX: 18
EndNote: 29
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 7,990 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 7,669 with geography defined
and 321 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 6,241 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,068 with geography defined
and 173 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,749 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,601 with geography defined
and 148 with unknown origin.
This study has combined three existing land evaporation (ET) products to obtain a single framework of a long-term (1980–2017) daily ET product at a spatial resolution of 0.25° to define the global proxy ET with lower uncertainties. The merged product is the best at capturing dynamics over different locations and times among all data sets. The merged product performed well over a range of vegetation cover scenarios and also captured the trend of land evaporation over different areas well.
This study has combined three existing land evaporation (ET) products to obtain a single...
