Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Tiexi Chen
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Shijie Li
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Daniel Fiifi Tawia Hagan
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tshinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Buda Su
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Viewed
Total article views: 8,154 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
6,373
1,632
149
8,154
239
151
215
HTML: 6,373
PDF: 1,632
XML: 149
Total: 8,154
Supplement: 239
BibTeX: 151
EndNote: 215
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Total article views: 6,398 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
5,285
1,001
112
6,398
239
132
185
HTML: 5,285
PDF: 1,001
XML: 112
Total: 6,398
Supplement: 239
BibTeX: 132
EndNote: 185
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Dec 2021)
Total article views: 1,756 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,088
631
37
1,756
19
30
HTML: 1,088
PDF: 631
XML: 37
Total: 1,756
BibTeX: 19
EndNote: 30
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 8,154 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 7,824 with geography defined
and 330 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 6,398 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,216 with geography defined
and 182 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,756 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,608 with geography defined
and 148 with unknown origin.
This study has combined three existing land evaporation (ET) products to obtain a single framework of a long-term (1980–2017) daily ET product at a spatial resolution of 0.25° to define the global proxy ET with lower uncertainties. The merged product is the best at capturing dynamics over different locations and times among all data sets. The merged product performed well over a range of vegetation cover scenarios and also captured the trend of land evaporation over different areas well.
This study has combined three existing land evaporation (ET) products to obtain a single...
