Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Tiexi Chen
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Shijie Li
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Daniel Fiifi Tawia Hagan
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tshinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Buda Su
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Viewed
Total article views: 8,119 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
6,347
1,623
149
8,119
233
150
213
HTML: 6,347
PDF: 1,623
XML: 149
Total: 8,119
Supplement: 233
BibTeX: 150
EndNote: 213
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Total article views: 6,366 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
5,262
992
112
6,366
233
131
183
HTML: 5,262
PDF: 992
XML: 112
Total: 6,366
Supplement: 233
BibTeX: 131
EndNote: 183
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Dec 2021)
Total article views: 1,753 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,085
631
37
1,753
19
30
HTML: 1,085
PDF: 631
XML: 37
Total: 1,753
BibTeX: 19
EndNote: 30
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 8,119 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 7,794 with geography defined
and 325 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 6,366 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,188 with geography defined
and 178 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,753 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,606 with geography defined
and 147 with unknown origin.
This study has combined three existing land evaporation (ET) products to obtain a single framework of a long-term (1980–2017) daily ET product at a spatial resolution of 0.25° to define the global proxy ET with lower uncertainties. The merged product is the best at capturing dynamics over different locations and times among all data sets. The merged product performed well over a range of vegetation cover scenarios and also captured the trend of land evaporation over different areas well.
This study has combined three existing land evaporation (ET) products to obtain a single...
