Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Tiexi Chen
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Shijie Li
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Daniel Fiifi Tawia Hagan
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tshinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Buda Su
Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, School of Geographical Sciences, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China
Viewed
Total article views: 9,155 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
6,959
2,017
179
9,155
303
173
248
HTML: 6,959
PDF: 2,017
XML: 179
Total: 9,155
Supplement: 303
BibTeX: 173
EndNote: 248
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Total article views: 7,282 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
5,798
1,344
140
7,282
303
152
215
HTML: 5,798
PDF: 1,344
XML: 140
Total: 7,282
Supplement: 303
BibTeX: 152
EndNote: 215
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Dec 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Dec 2021)
Total article views: 1,873 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,161
673
39
1,873
21
33
HTML: 1,161
PDF: 673
XML: 39
Total: 1,873
BibTeX: 21
EndNote: 33
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 16 Mar 2021)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 9,155 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 8,822 with geography defined
and 333 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 7,282 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 7,096 with geography defined
and 186 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,873 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,726 with geography defined
and 147 with unknown origin.
This study has combined three existing land evaporation (ET) products to obtain a single framework of a long-term (1980–2017) daily ET product at a spatial resolution of 0.25° to define the global proxy ET with lower uncertainties. The merged product is the best at capturing dynamics over different locations and times among all data sets. The merged product performed well over a range of vegetation cover scenarios and also captured the trend of land evaporation over different areas well.
This study has combined three existing land evaporation (ET) products to obtain a single...
