Articles | Volume 18, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-6191-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-6191-2026
Data description article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
28 Aug 2026
Data description article | Highlight paper |  | 28 Aug 2026

Integrated dataset of atmospheric bioaerosols over east Asia

Zhongwei Huang, Wenjin Zhang, Qing Dong, Teruya Maki, Yongkai Wang, Yuanzong Ji, Fanli Xue, Xuefei Huo, Da Lu, Dongdong Wang, Jinsen Shi, Jianrong Bi, and Jianping Huang
Abstract

Bioaerosols are one of the main types of aerosols originating from the Earth's biosphere and are widely found in the atmosphere. They possess both biological attributes and aerosol characteristics, thereby exerting significant influences on climate, the environment, ecosystems, and public health. However, their regional-scale distribution, influencing factors, climatic and environmental impacts remain unclear due to the scarcity of observational data. This study firstly establishes an integrated bioaerosol dataset based on a large-scale dust–bioaerosol field campaign conducted across East Asia using unified sampling and analytical methods. The dataset systematically integrates atmospheric bioaerosol number concentrations and bacterial community structure at multiple taxonomic levels across 45 sites in China, Japan, South Korea, and Mongolia. In addition, meteorological variables (e.g., air temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and direction), air quality parameters (e.g., PM10 and PM2.5), and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data during the sampling period were incorporated from multiple sources. Further analysis of this integrated dataset indicates that bioaerosol number concentrations are negatively correlated with local NDVI. Moreover, there is a clear relationship between bioaerosol number concentration and air temperature, with a peak observed at approximately 20 °C. A pronounced diurnal variation in bioaerosol concentrations is also found, which is strongly associated with Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) and particulate matter concentrations. In addition, substantial differences in community structure were observed across different underlying surface types, and the α-diversity indices (Shannon and Chao1 indices) were negatively correlated with NDVI. This dataset provides a robust foundation for advancing research on atmospheric bioaerosol processes, as well as their implications for climate, the environment, public health, and interdisciplinary studies. The dataset generated in this study is openly available via Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21337360, Huang et al., 2026).

Editorial statement
This Data description paper provides an integrated bioaerosol dataset based on a large-scale dust–bioaerosol field campaign conducted across 45 stations in East Asia. It uses unified sampling and analytical methods in sites across China, Japan, South Korea, and Mongolia. Moreover, the in situ data are key to determining relationships with widely-used satellite products. It is a unique dataset of high value to the community and high potential reusability.
Share
1 Introduction

Bioaerosols are defined as living aerosol particles, biologically active components, and metabolic products of organisms, with particle diameters ranging from 0.001 to 100 µm (Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al., 2016; Després et al., 2012). For coarse-mode particles with diameters greater than 1 µm, these particles typically account for approximately 30 % of both number and mass concentrations in urban and rural atmospheres, and their contribution can reach up to 80 % in pristine rainforest regions (Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al., 2016). Bioaerosols are transported through the air, due to their small size and low density, can be readily dispersed across different environments (Van Leuken et al., 2016). Because they exhibit both physical and biological properties, they play important roles in public health, climate processes, and ecosystem functioning (Du et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2024a).

Most bioaerosols fall within the respirable size range (Bulski, 2020; Estillore et al., 2016), which allows their entry into the human body via the respiratory tract or penetrate compromised skin and mucous membranes, thereby posing potential health risks (Bulski, 2020). Deposition in different depths within the respiratory system may induce allergic or toxic responses in both humans and animals (Hofmann, 2011; Eriksen et al., 2023). Bioaerosols also play critical roles in modulating climate change. As airborne particulate matter, they absorb and scatter solar and terrestrial longwave radiation, thereby exerting direct regional and global radiative forcing (Huang et al., 2024a). Furthermore, bioaerosols can act as nuclei for cloud condensation, ice crystals, and precipitation, thereby influencing hydrological cycles and climate systems (Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al., 2016; Huang et al., 2025). A unique property of airborne biological components is their ability to produce ice-nucleating proteins (INPs), which can promote ice developing when subzero temperatures are relatively high (Hoose and Möhler, 2012). These biological INPs are active above 15 °C, whereas mineral dust particles typically are not (Morris et al., 2013). In addition, atmospheric microorganisms can influence the photochemical and chemical reactions of aerosols, thereby altering their composition (Péguilhan et al., 2025), with consequent feedbacks on climate processes (Meinander et al., 2022). Both viable and inactivated microbial cells exhibit comparable oxidative potential and may even enhance the oxidizing power of chemical species in the atmosphere (Samake et al., 2017).

Bioaerosol sampling has been conducted worldwide, yielding data on their distribution, composition, sources, and atmospheric roles, thereby advancing our understanding of their behavior and influencing factors (Huang et al., 2024b; Zhang et al., 2022b; Petersson Sjögren et al., 2023; Jabeen et al., 2023). However, existing studies lack standardized sampling and analytical protocols. Even when operated simultaneously, different sampling instruments may produce varying bioaerosol signals and exhibit differences in collection efficiency for different types of microorganisms (Mainelis, 2019; Mescioglu et al., 2021; Mbareche et al., 2018). The pore size and material of filter membranes can influence results of airborne microbiome studies (Guo et al., 2024; Jeong and Kim, 2021). Differences in sampling flow rate can also affect results, as high flow rates increase the risk of adverse effects (Boifot et al., 2024). Following collection, temperature conditions during sample transport and short- or long-term storage, can influence DNA degradation and alter sample composition (Clasen et al., 2020). These factors collectively reduce sample comparability and affect downstream analyses. During molecular analysis, significant differences in taxonomic richness, community composition, and diversity may arise from the selection of different 16S rRNA variable regions (Larsen et al., 2015; Lin and Ju, 2023). The application of different reference databases for taxonomic classification can also yield divergent results due to inherent database discrepancies (Balvočiūtė and Huson, 2017; Ramakodi, 2022). Together, these factors complicate cross-study comparisons. Although many studies aim to link environmental, meteorological, and chemical factors with bioaerosols, variations in sampling and analytical methods may lead to contradictory conclusions and hinder the development of robust findings, as it is often unclear whether discrepancies arise from environmental variability or methodological heterogeneity (Sajjad et al., 2023; Mainelis, 2019; Pogner et al., 2024b).

In addition to methodological differences, the spatial and temporal coverage of bioaerosol sampling remains sparse (Zawadowicz et al., 2019). Many observations are restricted to isolated field campaigns or single-site stations, with particularly limited coverage in arid regions and developing countries (Shammi et al., 2021). In addition, long-term continuous records are scarce, and standardized time series spanning multiple years and sites are largely lacking. This limitation not only constrains the detection of long-term trends and interannual variability but also hampers the use of observations for model calibration and the assessment of climate-scale impacts (Huang et al., 2024a; Safatov et al., 2022). Furthermore, methodological heterogeneity across studies complicates data integration and limits large-scale analyses (Alfaro-Perez et al., 2025). Given the highly dynamic nature of the atmosphere, bioaerosol concentrations exhibit substantial spatial and temporal variability (Šantl-Temkiv et al., 2019), and conclusions derived from studies with limited spatial or temporal coverage may therefore be inconsistent (Jiang et al., 2022). Together, these factors further reduce the robustness of integrated assessments of bioaerosol impacts on climate, the environment, ecosystems, and human health (Gashi et al., 2025).

East Asia is one of the most densely populated and environmentally diverse regions worldwide (Su et al., 2015), characterized by frequent dust events driven by vast arid source regions in Central Asia and desert (Chen et al., 2026; Yu et al., 2023), rapid urbanization and industrialization (Tseng et al., 2024), intensive agricultural activities, and strong land–ocean interactions (Zhou et al., 2025; Lang et al., 2025). The abundance, dispersal, and community composition of atmospheric bioaerosols are influenced by meteorological conditions, including wind speed and direction, atmospheric stability, temperature, humidity, and precipitation (Uetake et al., 2019; Tignat-Perrier et al., 2019; Petersson Sjögren et al., 2023; Drautz-Moses et al., 2022). Under ongoing climate change, drought conditions are projected to intensify (Araujo et al., 2025; Xu et al., 2023), with East Asia expected to be particularly affected (Qi et al., 2024). Within this broad meteorological framework, dust events are of particular relevance in East Asia because the mobilization of mineral particles can simultaneously release soil-associated microorganisms and other biological materials into the atmosphere, while strong regional winds can transport these particles over long distances (Maki et al., 2019; Zhou et al., 2024; Tang et al., 2018). Thus, dust is an important mechanism linking terrestrial source areas with downwind environments. On this basis, the Dust–Bioaerosol (DuBi) field observation program adopted a source–transport–receptor perspective, incorporating observations in source regions, along transport pathways, and at downwind receptor sites. Given the extensive arid and semi-arid regions of East Asia and the large populations residing in downwind areas (Jin et al., 2022), the regional transport of dust-associated bioaerosols warrants particular attention because of its potential environmental and public health implications.

Despite increasing bioaerosol observations in East Asia, existing studies are often fragmented in terms of sampling protocols, temporal coverage, and analytical methodologies (Safatov et al., 2022). This methodological and observational heterogeneity limits regional comparisons and large-scale assessments and makes it difficult to distinguish genuine environmental variability from differences introduced by sampling and analytical procedures (Pogner et al., 2024a). Accurate assessment of bioaerosol-related effects therefore requires broader observational networks, longer and more continuous monitoring records, and greater methodological standardization to facilitate regional and transregional data integration and sharing (Huang et al., 2024a). Accordingly, the establishment of a bioaerosol dataset with broad geographical coverage and consistent sampling and analytical methodologies is essential for advancing regional-scale research and applications (Sajjad et al., 2023; Gashi et al., 2025; Boifot et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2022). Such a dataset would enable a more comprehensive characterization of the geographic distribution, spatiotemporal variability, and environmental and health impacts of bioaerosols, while supporting the assessment of public health risks under climate change and providing a scientific basis for mitigation strategies and policy development.

2 Sampling sites and methods

2.1 Sampling sites

The DuBi (Dust–Bioaerosol) field sampling campaign was conducted over an extended period and across a broad spatial domain. From 2011 to 2021, sampling was performed at multiple sites across East Asia, including China, Japan, South Korea, and Mongolia (see Table 1 for details). These sites encompass a wide range of surface types and climatic conditions, providing strong regional representativeness and ensuring comparability among observations (Fig. 1).

https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/6191/2026/essd-18-6191-2026-f01

Figure 1(a) Spatial distribution of sampling sites from 2011 to 2021; (b) spatial distribution of the mean aerosol optical depth (AOD) from 2000 to 2020.

This field observation campaign substantially enhanced the temporal and spatial coverage of bioaerosol measurements in East Asia. As a result, the compiled dataset enables a more comprehensive characterization of bioaerosol distributions across diverse environmental settings, thereby improving our understanding of the regional features and evolution patterns of bioaerosols in East Asia.

Table 1Summary of land surface characteristics, number of samples, locations, sampling period (local standard time, LST), and sampling duration throughout the DuBi field campaign conducted between 2011 and 2021.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

2.2 Sampling methods

A custom-designed bioaerosol sampler was employed for field collection to ensure operational stability and methodological consistency across sites. Instruments of this type have been widely used in bioaerosol research (Maki et al., 2010; Qi et al., 2023). To construct the sampler, a 13 mm polycarbonate membrane with 0.2 µm pore size (Whatman 111106 and GTTP01300) was inserted inside a 13 mm Swinnex filter holder (Millipore SX0001300) fitted. Polycarbonate membranes offer advantages such as high chemical resistance, high thermal stability, and a low tendency to adsorb proteins or extractable substances (Ferguson et al., 2019). Their optical transparency also enables accurate microscopic detection. A micro air pump (AS ONE MAS-1, Japan) with a standard flow rate of 12 L min−1 was connected to the sampler to draw atmospheric microorganisms onto the filter membrane (Fig. 2a, b).

https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/6191/2026/essd-18-6191-2026-f02

Figure 2(a) Bioaerosols sampler used during the DuBi field sampling campaign; (b) power supply and sampling pump; (c) fluorescence microscope; (e–g) representative fluorescence micrographs of DAPI-stained samples, with the four particle-colour categories identified labels.

Download

Prior to sampling, both the filters and filter holders were sterilized. The assemblies were first rinsed with 75 % ethanol, followed by ultrapure water to remove residual detergent. Subsequent processing of the filters and holders was conducted in a laminar-flow hood, where they were immersed in absolute ethanol and ultrapure water to further remove adhered organic residues. The dried filters and holders were then assembled and sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min, followed by ultraviolet irradiation for 30 min (Xue et al., 2024; Qi et al., 2021). The sterilized components were sealed in pre-sterilized collection tubes and sterile bags until use. During sampling, operators wore masks and sterile gloves, and the samplers were mounted at a height of 1.5 m a.g.l. Real-time flowmeter readings obtained immediately before the micro-pump was turned on and immediately before it was turned off were recorded as the initial and final sampling flow rates, respectively. After sampling, filters were labeled with the sampling location and time, stored at 20 °C during transport, and subsequently transferred to 80 °C freezers for long-term preservation.

2.3 Fluorescence microscopy analysis

Bioaerosol particle concentrations were determined using DAPI staining (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, D9542, Sigma), followed by fluorescence microscopy. 4 % paraformaldehyde (250 µL) was introduced to each filter holder containing the membrane to fix the samples for 1–2 h. The filters were then rinsed with sterile ultrapure water to remove residual fixative. Under light-protected conditions, DAPI solution (10 µg mL−1, 250 µL) was introduced to stain the samples for approximately 15 min (Maki et al., 2014), followed by a final rinse with sterile water.

During slide preparation, the membrane was treated with non-fluorescent immersion oil (IMMOIL-F30CC, Olympus) for wetting. The coverslip was then pressed firmly, and excess immersion oil was removed using a dust-free wipe. Samples were examined using a fluorescence microscope (BX53 and DP72, Olympus) with an excitation wavelength range of 340–390 nm. A fluorescence microscope (BX53 and DP72, Olympus) providing a 340–390 nm excitation wavelength range was employed to examine the samples (Tang et al., 2018).

As shown in Fig. 2e–g, four categories of particles were distinguishable under the fluorescence microscope based on their emitted colors: blue, yellow, white, and black. DAPI-stained microbial cells produced strong blue or blue-green fluorescence, whereas mineral particles appeared white (Maki et al., 2013). Black particles were attributed to black carbon (Liu et al., 2023). Yellow particles were generally interpreted as non-DNA-containing particles (Kepner and Pratt, 1994). However, other studies have shown that water-soluble salts (Liu et al., 2023) and organic matter (Mostajir et al., 1995) can also exhibit yellow fluorescence. In this study, most yellow-green particles were associated with mineral dust and were therefore considered to be mineral particles enriched in water-soluble salts and organic material. In this study, bioaerosols were operationally defined as particles exhibiting cellular morphology and emitting blue-green fluorescence after DAPI staining. Accordingly, the reported bioaerosol concentrations represent the fraction of atmospheric biological particles that met both the morphological and fluorescence-based identification criteria, rather than the full range of primary biological aerosol particles (PBAPs), Viruses were outside the detection scope of this method. Pollen and plant fragments were not separately identified or quantified and would only have been included when they met both identification criteria. Hereafter, “bioaerosol concentration” refers specifically to the particle concentration determined using this operational definition. For each filter membrane, 20 randomly selected microscopic fields were imaged, and all particles belonging to the four categories were manually counted using the Cell Counter plugin in ImageJ.

Bioaerosol number concentrations, C (particles m−3) were calculated using Eq. (1):

(1) C = S 1 × N 0 S 0 × V ,

where S1 is the filtration area of the filter membrane (µm2), S0 is the field-of-view area of the microscope (µm2), V is the sampled air volume (m3), and N0 is the average number of bioaerosol particles observed per microscopic field of view (Maki et al., 2019).

2.4 16S rRNA gene sequencing

The 16S rRNA gene has been widely used to characterize microbial community composition and diversity (Giles et al., 2023; Nagarajan et al., 2023). The UltraClean Soil DNA Kit (MoBio, San Diego, CA) was employed to extract bacterial DNA in this study. Sequencing was performed on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 and Illumina MiSeq platforms in PE250, PE150, or PE300 modes. The bacterial 16S rRNA gene V4–V5 hypervariable region was amplified using the 515F/907R primer pair (forward: GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA; reverse: CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGTTT) (Fang et al., 2017). Paired-end sequencing produced reads exceeding 250 bp for each sample, which were subsequently sorted according to their unique barcode sequences. Blank controls were processed alongside the samples during both DNA extraction and PCR amplification. No PCR amplicons were detected in these controls, demonstrating that the entire experimental workflow was free from detectable contamination (Qi et al., 2023; Karstens et al., 2019).

The Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology pipeline (QIIME2; version 2024.2) was used to assign taxonomic identities to the raw sequences (Bolyen et al., 2019). High-quality sequences were denoised and resolved into amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) at single-nucleotide resolution. Taxonomic classification was assigned using the SILVA v138 reference database (Pin et al., 2021). ASVs classified as chloroplasts, mitochondria, archaea, eukaryotes, or unassigned were removed prior to downstream ecological analyses.

In this study, the Shannon and Chao1 indices were used to quantify the alpha diversity of bacterial communities. These indices were calculated using the vegan package in R (v4.4.4). Differences in alpha diversity among surface types were assessed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test to evaluate statistical significance (Loos et al., 2024).

2.5 Meteorological and air quality Data

The integrated dataset compiled in this study includes the following data products (Fig. 3):

https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/6191/2026/essd-18-6191-2026-f03

Figure 3Schematic overview of the integrated database construction workflow and data sources.

Download

3 Results and discussion

Table 2 reports the Mean bioaerosol concentration and genus with highest mean relative abundance at each site. Concentrations span from 3.39 × 104 at Tazhong to 6.65 × 106 at Dalanzadgad. The three highest site means occur at Dalanzadgad, Kanazawa, and Dunhuang; the three lowest occur at Tazhong, Namtso, and Minfeng. These contrasts establish pronounced spatial heterogeneity in the reported site means. Lactococcus is the most frequently dominant genus, ranking first at 9 of 14 sites (64.3 %); Ralstonia is reported at 2 sites.

Table 2Mean bioaerosol concentrations and dominant genera at the sampling sites.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

3.1 Correlation of bioaerosol concentrations and NDVI & air temperature

To characterize the general relationships between bioaerosol concentration, NDVI, and air temperature across East Asia while minimizing the influence of dust transport, this analysis was restricted to samples collected under non-dust conditions. As shown in Fig. 4a, bioaerosol concentrations were significantly negatively correlated with NDVI. In regions with low NDVI, sparse vegetation cover and dry, loose surface soils may facilitate the wind-driven entrainment of soil-associated microorganisms and other biological particles into the atmosphere (Qi et al., 2023). In contrast, denser vegetation in regions with high NDVI may enhance the interception of airborne particles and promote dry deposition, thereby contributing to lower atmospheric bioaerosol concentrations (Zhai et al., 2022). Although vegetated surfaces may also emit pollen and plant fragments, these particle categories were not separately identified in the present study. The observed correlation therefore represents the net relationship between NDVI and the operationally defined DAPI-positive particle concentration rather than the response of individual PBAP categories.

Figure 4b indicates that the relationship between temperature and bioaerosol concentration is non-linear. When temperatures are below approximately 20 °C, bioaerosol concentrations show a positive correlation with temperature. However, as temperature increases further, bioaerosol concentrations decline markedly. A possible explanation is that, within an optimal temperature range, warming enhances atmospheric mixing and air movement, thereby promoting the dispersal of microorganisms into the atmosphere and resulting in higher concentrations (Cavicchioli et al., 2019). At excessively high temperatures, however, conditions become unfavorable for microbial growth and reproduction, and the abundance of microorganisms from certain sources may decrease accordingly (Zhang et al., 2022b).

https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/6191/2026/essd-18-6191-2026-f04

Figure 4(a) Relationship between bioaerosol concentration and NDVI during the DuBi field sampling campaign. The green points represent mean bioaerosol concentrations calculated by binning NDVI into intervals of 0.1 and averaging all samples within each interval. (b) Relationship between bioaerosol concentration and air temperature. The orange points represent mean bioaerosol concentrations calculated by binning temperature into intervals of 2.5 °C and averaging all samples within each interval. The shaded areas indicate the 95 % confidence intervals.

Download

3.2 Diurnal variation of bioaerosol concentration

Figure 5 shows the temporal variations in bioaerosol concentrations in Yuzhong, China, on 6 and 15 November 2020. As illustrated, bioaerosol concentrations on both days exhibit pronounced diurnal patterns rather than random fluctuations. Concentrations are lowest in the early morning (07:00–09:00), followed by a gradual increase, reaching a peak in the afternoon (15:00–17:00), and then decreasing thereafter. This pattern suggests that bioaerosol concentrations are governed by well-defined diurnal processes.

https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/6191/2026/essd-18-6191-2026-f05

Figure 5Temporal variations in bioaerosol, NO2, and CO concentrations observed in Yuzhong on (a) 6 November and (b) 15 November 2020.

Download

The concentrations of NO2 and CO also display clear temporal variations with similar overall trends, suggesting that these two trace gases may share common sources. However, the temporal variations of NO2 and CO on the two sampling days are not fully consistent with those of bioaerosol concentrations. This discrepancy implies that short-term variations in bioaerosol concentrations during the sampling period were not primarily controlled by anthropogenic emissions or changes in the atmospheric boundary layer height (Li et al., 2022). Instead, they are more likely associated with surface biological emissions and atmospheric dynamical processes. These processes include daytime increases in surface temperature that enhance microbial activity, intensified release from soil and vegetation surfaces, and strengthened surface turbulence that facilitates the entrainment of particles into the atmosphere (Gashi et al., 2025; Sharma et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022a; Kulmala et al., 2023).

Figure 6 illustrates diurnal-scale variations in bioaerosol concentrations and related physical parameters in Yonago, Japan, from March to June 2015. As shown, bioaerosol concentrations exhibit pronounced high-frequency fluctuations on the diurnal timescale, indicating strong modulation by short-timescale processes. Within each month, concentrations consistently increase and then decrease, forming a recurrent “single-peak, within-month” pattern throughout March–June. This suggests that bioaerosols do not behave as random background noise but instead represent an aerosol component characterized by a well-defined temporal structure.

https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/6191/2026/essd-18-6191-2026-f06

Figure 6Daily variations in (a) bioaerosol concentration and aerosol optical depth (AOD), (b) PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations, (c) NO2 concentration, and (d) O3 concentration in Yonago, Japan, during March–June 2015.

Download

During the sampling period, a prominent concentration peak occurred in mid-April, substantially exceeding levels observed in other months and persisting for several consecutive days rather than representing a single-day anomaly. Given that no corresponding extreme peaks are observed in the other variables shown in the figure, this event is unlikely to have been driven solely by particulate matter (PM) or gaseous pollution. Instead, it more plausibly reflects a regional-scale, concentrated release from biological sources.

AOD at 550 nm reaches near-maximum values during the major bioaerosol concentration peaks and varies largely in phase with bioaerosol concentrations. The temporal variations in PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations are closely consistent with those of bioaerosol concentrations, with PM2.5 exhibiting a slight lag. This indicates that, during this event, bioaerosols and non-biological particles were influenced by shared controlling processes rather than varying independently.

In contrast, NO2 showed concurrent increases with bioaerosol concentrations during some peak periods, while O3 exhibited no obvious temporal correspondence. These results suggest that gaseous pollutants were not the dominant drivers of the observed bioaerosol variability during the sampling period, although NO2 may reflect local atmospheric conditions associated with certain bioaerosol enhancement events.

3.3 Bacterial community structure

To investigate the dominant taxa at different hierarchical levels across varying underlying surface types, this study selected the five taxa with the highest relative abundances for each surface type for analysis. The underlying surface was classified into six categories based on NDVI: NDVI <  0.1 was defined as very low vegetation cover; 0.1  NDVI < 0.2 as low vegetation cover; 0.2  NDVI < 0.4 as medium–low vegetation cover; 0.4  NDVI < 0.6 as medium vegetation cover; and 0.6  NDVI  0.8 as high vegetation cover. In addition, because the sampling campaign included aircraft measurements, an additional category representing the upper atmosphere was included.

Figure 7a presents the bacterial community composition at the phylum level. Proteobacteria dominate the community, with a relative abundance of 60.1 %, followed by Firmicutes (24.8 %). Among the identified phyla, Chloroflexi are primarily associated with areas of low vegetation cover (43.0 %) and very low vegetation cover (33.2 %). Actinobacteria and Acidobacteriota exhibit similar distribution patterns, occurring mainly in low-vegetation (33.9 % and 35.3 %, respectively) and very low vegetation cover regions (31.3 % and 28.0 %, respectively). These three phyla represent dominant bacterial groups in soils under varying vegetation conditions (Zhou and Wang, 2023). As soil and vegetation are important sources of airborne microorganisms, contributions from soil sources to atmospheric microbial populations become more pronounced under conditions of low vegetation cover (Archer et al., 2023; Xie et al., 2020).

https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/6191/2026/essd-18-6191-2026-f07

Figure 7(a) Distribution of dominant taxa at the phylum level across different underlying surface types; (b) distribution of dominant taxa at the genus level across different underlying surface types.

Download

Figure 7b shows the bacterial community composition at the genus level. The dominant taxon at the genus level is Lactococcus, with a relative abundance of 23.4 %. Among the identified genera, Staphylococcus (87.8 %), Alcaligenes (67.3 %), and Enterococcus (49.6 %) are predominantly distributed in the upper atmosphere. Paraburkholderia (61.6 %) is mainly distributed in areas with high vegetation cover. The pronounced enrichment of Staphylococcus, Alcaligenes, and Enterococcus in upper-atmosphere samples may be attributed to their strong environmental tolerance and diverse source characteristics, which facilitate survival during atmospheric vertical transport and under selective filtering processes in upper-atmosphere environments (García-Solache and Rice, 2019; Onyango and Alreshidi, 2018; Machado et al., 2023; Pedrosa-Silva and Venancio, 2023). Paraburkholderia, a genus typically associated with plants, receives sustained and stable biological inputs in regions with high vegetation cover, making it more likely to accumulate in near-surface air over densely vegetated areas (Esmaeel et al., 2018; Eberl and Vandamme, 2016).

3.4 Bacterial diversity

As shown in Fig. 8a and c, the mean values of both the Shannon and Chao1 indices across different underlying surface types follow the same decreasing order: low vegetation cover > very low vegetation cover > medium–low vegetation cover > high vegetation cover > medium vegetation cover. This pattern indicates that α diversity and species richness are highest in areas with low vegetation cover, whereas areas with medium vegetation cover exhibit the lowest diversity. Variations in α diversity across vegetation cover gradients reflect the combined effects of source inputs, multi-source mixing, and ecological filtering processes (Mantoani et al., 2024; Lu et al., 2024; Gashi et al., 2025). Low vegetation cover areas integrate both soil- and vegetation-derived biological sources and are typically associated with stronger surface disturbance, resulting in the highest species richness and diversity (Nie et al., 2024; Mu et al., 2020; Archer et al., 2023). In contrast, medium vegetation cover regions suppress soil resuspension while not yet developing the complex phyllosphere-associated bioaerosol sources characteristic of highly vegetated areas. Consequently, these regions experience fewer source inputs and stronger environmental filtering, leading to the lowest α diversity (Zhai et al., 2022; Robinson et al., 2021).

https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/18/6191/2026/essd-18-6191-2026-f08

Figure 8(a) Relationship between underlying surface types and the Shannon index; (b) relationship between NDVI and the Shannon index; (c) relationship between underlying surface types and the Chao1 index; (d) relationship between NDVI and the Chao1 index. Note: In panels (a) and (c), asterisks indicate statistically significant differences in diversity indices between sample groups based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, whereas the absence of asterisks indicates no significant difference. One to four asterisks denote P< 0.05, P< 0.01, P< 0.001, and P< 0.0001, respectively. In panels (b) and (d), blue dots represent mean diversity indices calculated by binning NDVI into intervals of 0.05 and averaging all samples within each bin; error bars indicate the standard error of the mean for each bin.

Download

Figure 8b and d further show that both the Shannon index (r=0.68, P=0.015) and the Chao1 index (r=0.818, P=0.0011) are negatively correlated with NDVI, with the Chao1 index exhibiting a stronger correlation. Based on the differing sensitivities of these two indices, it can be inferred that, under low-NDVI conditions, atmospheric bacterial communities are more strongly influenced by external source inputs, leading to increased species richness. However, many of the newly introduced taxa occur at low relative abundances and therefore have a limited effect on community evenness, resulting in a smaller magnitude of change in the Shannon index compared to the Chao1 index.

4 Data availability

Interested researchers can download the integrated dataset from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21337360 (Huang et al., 2026). The non-biological aerosol particle number concentration data and the bacterial community structure data at the domain, class, order, family, and species levels during the sampling period are not currently publicly available. These data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

5 Conclusions

This study reports an integrated dataset of atmospheric bioaerosols obtained from a large-scale dust–bioaerosol field observation campaign conducted across East Asia using a unified sampling and analytical protocol. The dataset includes number concentrations of both biological and non-biological aerosols, bacterial community structure at multiple taxonomic levels, together with concurrent environmental variables and air quality parameters.

The database enables the systematic analysis of correlations between regional-scale vegetation cover, temperature, and airborne bioaerosol concentrations and community structure. The results indicate that bioaerosol concentrations exhibit a significant negative correlation with NDVI. Bioaerosol concentrations increase with air temperature below approximately 20 °C, whereas a decline is observed at higher temperatures. Temporal-scale analysis demonstrates that the diurnal variation in bioaerosol concentration exhibits a discernible intraday structure rather than random fluctuations. In addition, the daily evolution of bioaerosol concentrations shows a relatively high degree of synchrony with AOD and particulate matter concentrations. Bacterial community structure and diversity analyses further demonstrate pronounced ecological differentiation among regions with varying vegetation cover, with α-diversity showing a significant negative correlation with NDVI.

By integrating concentration data, bacterial community structure, and multifactor environmental information within a unified methodological framework, this database constitutes a consistent and comprehensive foundation for investigating land–atmosphere interface ecological processes and the spatiotemporal evolution of regional bioaerosols, with clear substantial scientific and applied value. Its broad spatial coverage and standardized observations provide valuable constraints for atmospheric and climate models, particularly in improving the representation of bioaerosol emissions, transport processes, and potential interactions with cloud formation. In addition, the dataset offers a basis for evaluating environmental exposure and associated public health risks across East Asia.

Although significant correlations were identified between bioaerosol characteristics and environmental variables such as NDVI and temperature, the underlying mechanisms remain unresolved. The lack of year-round continuous observations at individual sites limits robust seasonal analysis, while the uneven spatial distribution of the network, particularly the underrepresentation of forested and other densely vegetated regions, constrains its ecosystem representativeness. Future studies should therefore combine longer-term monitoring, expanded coverage of vegetation-dominated environments, and more detailed process-based analyses to better resolve seasonal variability, vegetation-related emissions, and the mechanisms linking bioaerosols to environmental conditions.

Author contributions

JH and ZH conceived and designed the database framework, established the unified sampling and analytical protocols, and supervised the overall project, including data validation and quality control. TM, JS and JB contributed to methodological development, provided technical support, and assisted in data validation and manuscript revision. QD, FX, YW, YJ, XH, DL, DW and WZ conducted field sampling and laboratory analyses and curated the dataset. WZ and QD performed the formal data analysis and prepared the figures. WZ prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.

Disclaimer

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the China National Urban Air Quality Real-Time Publishing Platform, NOAA NCEI, Japan's Atmospheric Environmental Regional Observation System (AEROS), AirKorea, NASA GES DISC/Earthdata, and NOAA CDR for providing the meteorological, air-quality, AOD, and NDVI datasets used in this study. We sincerely thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions. We also thank all team members and collaborators for their contributions to field observations, data collection, and data processing.

Financial support

This research was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant no. 2023YFC3708202), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42421001), the Gansu Science and Technology Major Program (grant no. 24ZDWA006), Prevention and Control of Emerging and Major Infectious Diseases-National Science and Technology Major Project 2027ZD01999500/2027ZD01999504”, and Major Project of Guangzhou National Laboratory (grant no. GZNL2024A01004).

Review statement

This paper was edited by Jing Wei and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

References

Alfaro-Perez, C., Barberá-Riera, M., de Llanos, R., and Delgado-Saborit, J. M.: Systematic review and meta-analysis of methodological approaches for characterising airborne SARS-CoV-2 RNA for environmental surveillance, NPJ Climate and Atmospheric Science, 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-01180-z, 2025. 

Araujo, D. S. A., Enquist, B. J., Frazier, A. E., Merow, C., Roehrdanz, P. R., Moulatlet, G. M., Zvoleff, A., Song, L., Maitner, B., and Nikolopoulos, E. I.: Global Future Drought Layers Based on Downscaled CMIP6 Models and Multiple Socioeconomic Pathways, Scientific Data, 12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04612-w, 2025. 

Archer, S. D. J., Lee, K. C., Caruso, T., Alcami, A., Araya, J. G., Cary, S. C., Cowan, D. A., Etchebehere, C., Gantsetseg, B., Gomez-Silva, B., Hartery, S., Hogg, I. D., Kansour, M. K., Lawrence, T., Lee, C. K., Lee, P. K. H., Leopold, M., Leung, M. H. Y., Maki, T., McKay, C. P., Al Mailem, D. M., Ramond, J.-B., Rastrojo, A., Šantl-Temkiv, T., Sun, H. J., Tong, X., Vandenbrink, B., Warren-Rhodes, K. A., and Pointing, S. B.: Contribution of soil bacteria to the atmosphere across biomes, Sci. Total Environ., 871, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162137, 2023. 

Balvočiūtė, M. and Huson, D. H.: SILVA, RDP, Greengenes, NCBI and OTT — how do these taxonomies compare?, BMC Genomics, 18, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-017-3501-4, 2017. 

Boifot, K. O., Skogan, G., and Dybwad, M.: Sampling efficiency and nucleic acid stability during long-term sampling with different bioaerosol samplers, Environ. Monit. Assess., 196, 577, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12735-7, 2024. 

Bolyen, E., Rideout, J. R., Dillon, M. R., Bokulich, N. A., Abnet, C. C., Al-Ghalith, G. A., Alexander, H., Alm, E. J., Arumugam, M., Asnicar, F., Bai, Y., Bisanz, J. E., Bittinger, K., Brejnrod, A., Brislawn, C. J., Brown, C. T., Callahan, B. J., Caraballo-Rodríguez, A. M., Chase, J., Cope, E. K., Da Silva, R., Diener, C., Dorrestein, P. C., Douglas, G. M., Durall, D. M., Duvallet, C., Edwardson, C. F., Ernst, M., Estaki, M., Fouquier, J., Gauglitz, J. M., Gibbons, S. M., Gibson, D. L., Gonzalez, A., Gorlick, K., Guo, J., Hillmann, B., Holmes, S., Holste, H., Huttenhower, C., Huttley, G. A., Janssen, S., Jarmusch, A. K., Jiang, L., Kaehler, B. D., Kang, K. B., Keefe, C. R., Keim, P., Kelley, S. T., Knights, D., Koester, I., Kosciolek, T., Kreps, J., Langille, M. G. I., Lee, J., Ley, R., Liu, Y.-X., Loftfield, E., Lozupone, C., Maher, M., Marotz, C., Martin, B. D., McDonald, D., McIver, L. J., Melnik, A. V., Metcalf, J. L., Morgan, S. C., Morton, J. T., Naimey, A. T., Navas-Molina, J. A., Nothias, L. F., Orchanian, S. B., Pearson, T., Peoples, S. L., Petras, D., Preuss, M. L., Pruesse, E., Rasmussen, L. B., Rivers, A., Robeson, M. S., Rosenthal, P., Segata, N., Shaffer, M., Shiffer, A., Sinha, R., Song, S. J., Spear, J. R., Swafford, A. D., Thompson, L. R., Torres, P. J., Trinh, P., Tripathi, A., Turnbaugh, P. J., Ul-Hasan, S., van der Hooft, J. J. J., Vargas, F., Vázquez-Baeza, Y., Vogtmann, E., von Hippel, M., Walters, W., Wan, Y., Wang, M., Warren, J., Weber, K. C., Williamson, C. H. D., Willis, A. D., Xu, Z. Z., Zaneveld, J. R., Zhang, Y., Zhu, Q., Knight, R., and Caporaso, J. G.: Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2, Nat. Biotechnol., 37, 852–857, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9, 2019. 

Bulski, K.: Bioaerosols at plants processing materials of plant origin – a review, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 27, 27507–27514, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09121-4, 2020. 

Cavicchioli, R., Ripple, W. J., Timmis, K. N., Azam, F., Bakken, L. R., Baylis, M., Behrenfeld, M. J., Boetius, A., Boyd, P. W., Classen, A. T., Crowther, T. W., Danovaro, R., Foreman, C. M., Huisman, J., Hutchins, D. A., Jansson, J. K., Karl, D. M., Koskella, B., Mark Welch, D. B., Martiny, J. B. H., Moran, M. A., Orphan, V. J., Reay, D. S., Remais, J. V., Rich, V. I., Singh, B. K., Stein, L. Y., Stewart, F. J., Sullivan, M. B., van Oppen, M. J. H., Weaver, S. C., Webb, E. A., and Webster, N. S.: Scientists' warning to humanity: microorganisms and climate change, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 17, 569–586, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0222-5, 2019. 

Chen, L., Schepanski, K., Zhang, K., Crocker, A. J., Xuan, C., and Wilson, P. A.: Atmospheric forcing of dust source activation across East Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 7523–7538, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-7523-2026, 2026. 

Clasen, L. A., Detheridge, A. P., Scullion, J., and Griffith, G. W.: Soil stabilisation for DNA metabarcoding of plants and fungi. Implications for sampling at remote locations or via third-parties, Metabarcoding and Metagenomics, 4, https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.58365, 2020. 

Després, V. R., Huffman, J. A., Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Safatov, A. S., Buryak, G., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Elbert, W., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., and Jaenicke, R.: Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review, Tellus B, 64, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598, 2012. 

Drautz-Moses, D. I., Luhung, I., Gusareva, E. S., Kee, C., Gaultier, N. E., Premkrishnan, B. N. V., Lee, C. F., Leong, S. T., Park, C., Yap, Z. H., Heinle, C. E., Lau, K. J. X., Purbojati, R. W., Lim, S. B. Y., Lim, Y. H., Kutmutia, S. K., Aung, N. W., Oliveira, E. L., Ng, S. G., Dacanay, J., Ang, P. N., Spence, S., Phung, W. J., Wong, A., Kennedy, R. J., Kalsi, N., Sasi, S. P., Chandrasekaran, L., Uchida, A., Junqueira, A. C. M., Kim, H. L., Hankers, R., Feuerle, T., Corsmeier, U., and Schuster, S. C.: Vertical stratification of the air microbiome in the lower troposphere, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 119, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117293119, 2022. 

Du, P., Du, R., Ren, W., Lu, Z., and Fu, P.: Seasonal variation characteristic of inhalable microbial communities in PM2.5 in Beijing city, China, Sci. Total Environ., 610–611, 308–315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.097, 2018. 

Eberl, L. and Vandamme, P.: Members of the genus Burkholderia: good and bad guys, F1000Research, 5, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8221.1, 2016. 

Eriksen, E., Afanou, A. K., Madsen, A. M., Straumfors, A., and Graff, P.: An assessment of occupational exposure to bioaerosols in automated versus manual waste sorting plants, Environ. Res., 218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.115040, 2023. 

Esmaeel, Q., Miotto, L., Rondeau, M., Leclere, V., Clement, C., Jacquard, C., Sanchez, L., and Barka, E. A.: Paraburkholderia phytofirmans PsJN-Plants Interaction: From Perception to the Induced Mechanisms, Front. Microbiol., 9, 2093, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02093, 2018. 

Estillore, A. D., Trueblood, J. V., and Grassian, V. H.: Atmospheric chemistry of bioaerosols: heterogeneous and multiphase reactions with atmospheric oxidants and other trace gases, Chem. Sci., 7, 6604–6616, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sc02353c, 2016. 

Fang, H., Chen, Y., Huang, L., and He, G.: Analysis of biofilm bacterial communities under different shear stresses using size-fractionated sediment, Sci. Rep., 7, 1299, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01446-4, 2017. 

Ferguson, R. M. W., Garcia‐Alcega, S., Coulon, F., Dumbrell, A. J., Whitby, C., and Colbeck, I.: Bioaerosol biomonitoring: Sampling optimization for molecular microbial ecology, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 19, 672–690, https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13002, 2019. 

Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Kampf, C. J., Weber, B., Huffman, J. A., Pöhlker, C., Andreae, M. O., Lang-Yona, N., Burrows, S. M., Gunthe, S. S., Elbert, W., Su, H., Hoor, P., Thines, E., Hoffmann, T., Després, V. R., and Pöschl, U.: Bioaerosols in the Earth system: Climate, health, and ecosystem interactions, Atmos. Res., 182, 346–376, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.07.018, 2016. 

García-Solache, M. and Rice, L. B.: The Enterococcus: a Model of Adaptability to Its Environment, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 32, https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00058-18, 2019. 

Gashi, N., Szőke, Z., Fauszt, P., Dávid, P., Mikolás, M., Gál, F., Stündl, L., Remenyik, J., and Paholcsek, M.: Bioaerosols in Agriculture: A Comprehensive Approach for Sustainable Crop Health and Environmental Balance, Agronomy, 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15051003, 2025. 

Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-16-0758.1, 2017. 

Giles, M. E., Caul, S., King, D., Mitchell, S., Sim, A., Neilson, R., and Paterson, E.: Grass variety selection of microbial community composition is associated with differences in soil CO2 emissions, Appl. Soil Ecol., 190, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.104968, 2023. 

Guo, J., Lv, M., Liu, Z., Qin, T., Qiu, H., Zhang, L., Lu, J., Hu, L., Yang, W., and Zhou, D.: Comprehensive performance evaluation of six bioaerosol samplers based on an aerosol wind tunnel, Environ. Int., 183, 108402, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108402, 2024. 

Hofmann, W.: Modelling inhaled particle deposition in the human lung – A review, J. Aerosol Sci., 42, 693–724, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.05.007, 2011. 

Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012, 2012. 

Huang, Z., Yu, X., Liu, Q., Maki, T., Alam, K., Wang, Y., Xue, F., Tang, S., Du, P., Dong, Q., Wang, D., and Huang, J.: Bioaerosols in the atmosphere: A comprehensive review on detection methods, concentration and influencing factors, Sci. Total Environ., 912, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168818, 2024a. 

Huang, Z., Dong, Q., Xue, F., Qi, J., Yu, X., Maki, T., Du, P., Gu, Q., Tang, S., Shi, J., Bi, J., Zhou, T., and Huang, J.: Large-Scale Dust–Bioaerosol Field Observations in East Asia, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 105, E501–E517, https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-23-0108.1, 2024b. 

Huang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhou, T., Ji, Y., Bi, J., Shi, J., Wen, H., and Huang, J.: Raman-Polarization-Fluorescence Spectroscopic Lidar for Real-Time Detection of Humic-like Substance Profiles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 59, 7235–7245, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c00028, 2025. 

Huang, Z., Zhang, W., Dong, Q., Maki, T., Wang, Y., Ji, Y., Xue, F., Huo, X., Lu, D., Wang, D., Shi, J., Bi, J., and Huang, J.: Integrated dataset of atmospheric bioaerosols over east Asia, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21337360, 2026. 

Jabeen, R., Kizhisseri, M. I., Mayanaik, S. N., and Mohamed, M. M.: Bioaerosol assessment in indoor and outdoor environments: a case study from India, Sci. Rep., 13, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44315-z, 2023. 

Jeong, S. Y. and Kim, T. G.: Comparison of five membrane filters to collect bioaerosols for airborne microbiome analysis, J. Appl. Microbiol., 131, 780–790, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14972, 2021. 

Jiang, X., Wang, C., Guo, J., Hou, J., Guo, X., Zhang, H., Tan, J., Li, M., Li, X., and Zhu, H.: Global Meta-analysis of Airborne Bacterial Communities and Associations with Anthropogenic Activities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 9891–9902, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c07923, 2022. 

Jin, J., Pang, M., Segers, A., Han, W., Fang, L., Li, B., Feng, H., Lin, H. X., and Liao, H.: Inverse modeling of the 2021 spring super dust storms in East Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 6393–6410, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-6393-2022, 2022. 

Karstens, L., Asquith, M., Davin, S., Fair, D., Gregory, W. T., Wolfe, A. J., Braun, J., and McWeeney, S.: Controlling for Contaminants in Low-Biomass 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Experiments, mSystems, 4, https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00290-19, 2019. 

Kepner, R. L. and Pratt, J. R.: Use of fluorochromes for direct enumeration of total bacteria in environmental samples: past and present, Microbiol. Rev., 58, 603–615, https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.58.4.603-615.1994, 1994. 

Kulmala, M., Kokkonen, T., Ezhova, E., Baklanov, A., Mahura, A., Mammarella, I., Bäck, J., Lappalainen, H. K., Tyuryakov, S., Kerminen, V.-M., Zilitinkevich, S., and Petäjä, T.: Aerosols, Clusters, Greenhouse Gases, Trace Gases and Boundary-Layer Dynamics: on Feedbacks and Interactions, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 186, 475–503, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-022-00769-8, 2023. 

Lang, Y., Zhang, J., Zhao, J., Gong, Y., Han, T., Deng, X., and Liu, Y.: Mechanisms and quantification: How anthropogenic aerosols weaken the East Asian summer monsoon, NPJ Climate and Atmospheric Science, 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00903-6, 2025. 

Larsen, P., Birtel, J., Walser, J.-C., Pichon, S., Bürgmann, H., and Matthews, B.: Estimating Bacterial Diversity for Ecological Studies: Methods, Metrics, and Assumptions, Plos One, 10, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125356, 2015. 

Li, J., Zuraimi, S., Schiavon, S., Wan, M. P., Xiong, J., and Tham, K. W.: Diurnal trends of indoor and outdoor fluorescent biological aerosol particles in a tropical urban area, Sci. Total Environ., 848, 157811, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157811, 2022. 

Lin, L. and Ju, F.: Evaluation of different 16S rRNA gene hypervariable regions and reference databases for profiling engineered microbiota structure and functional guilds in a swine wastewater treatment plant, Interface Focus, 13, 20230012, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2023.0012, 2023. 

Liu, T., Zhang, J., Cao, J., Zheng, H., Zhan, C., Liu, H., Zhang, L., Xiao, K., Liu, S., Xiang, D., and Zhang, D.: Identification of coexistence of biological and non-biological aerosol particles with DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) stain, Particuology, 72, 49–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2022.02.009, 2023. 

Loos, D., Filho, A. P. d. C., Dutilh, B. E., Barber, A. E., and Panagiotou, G.: A global survey of host, aquatic, and soil microbiomes reveals shared abundance and genomic features between bacterial and fungal generalists, Cell Rep., 43, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114046, 2024. 

Lu, C., Xiao, Z., Li, H., Han, R., Sun, A., Xiang, Q., Zhu, Z., Li, G., Yang, X., Zhu, Y.-G., and Chen, Q.-L.: Aboveground plants determine the exchange of pathogens within air-phyllosphere-soil continuum in urban greenspaces, J. Hazard. Mater., 465, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.133149, 2024. 

Machado, R. A. R., Loulou, A., Bhat, A. H., Mastore, M., Terrettaz, C., Brivio, M. F., and Kallel, S.: Acinetobacter nematophilus sp. nov., Alcaligenes nematophilus sp. nov., Enterobacter nematophilus sp. nov., and Kaistia nematophila sp. nov., Isolated from Soil-Borne Nematodes and Proposal for the Elevation of Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. faecalis, Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. parafaecalis, and Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. phenolicus to the Species Level, Taxonomy, 3, 148–168, https://doi.org/10.3390/taxonomy3010012, 2023. 

Mainelis, G.: Bioaerosol sampling: Classical approaches, advances, and perspectives, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 54, 496–519, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1671950, 2019. 

Maki, T., Susuki, S., Kobayashi, F., Kakikawa, M., Tobo, Y., Yamada, M., Higashi, T., Matsuki, A., Hong, C., Hasegawa, H., and Iwasaka, Y.: Phylogenetic analysis of atmospheric halotolerant bacterial communities at high altitude in an Asian dust (KOSA) arrival region, Suzu City, Sci. Total Environ., 408, 4556–4562, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.04.002, 2010. 

Maki, T., Hara, K., Yamada, M., Kobayashi, F., Hasegawa, H., and Iwasaka, Y.: Epifluorescent Microscopic Observation of Aerosol, Earozoru Kenkyu, 28, 201–207, https://doi.org/10.11203/jar.28.201, 2013. 

Maki, T., Puspitasari, F., Hara, K., Yamada, M., Kobayashi, F., Hasegawa, H., and Iwasaka, Y.: Variations in the structure of airborne bacterial communities in a downwind area during an Asian dust (Kosa) event, Sci. Total Environ., 488–489, 75–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.04.044, 2014. 

Maki, T., Lee, K. C., Kawai, K., Onishi, K., Hong, C. S., Kurosaki, Y., Shinoda, M., Kai, K., Iwasaka, Y., Archer, S. D. J., Lacap‐Bugler, D. C., Hasegawa, H., and Pointing, S. B.: Aeolian Dispersal of Bacteria Associated With Desert Dust and Anthropogenic Particles Over Continental and Oceanic Surfaces, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 5579–5588, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029597, 2019. 

Mantoani, M. C., Guerra, L. C. C., Andrade, M. F., Dias, M. A. F. S., Dias, P. L. S., Rodrigues, F., Silva, D. M. C., Filho, V. B. D., Rudke, A. P., Martins, J. A., Martins, L. D., Torezan, J. M. D., Brancalion, P. H. S., Guillemot, J., Campoe, O. C., Phillips, V., Carotenuto, F., Šantl-Temkiv, T., Morris, C. E., and Gonçalves, F. L. T.: Land-use patterns and fungal bioaerosols in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome, Discover Environment, 2, https://doi.org/10.1007/s44274-024-00049-x, 2024. 

Mbareche, H., Veillette, M., Bilodeau, G. J., Duchaine, C., and Schaffner, D. W.: Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity, Appl. Environ. Microb., 84, https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01589-18, 2018. 

Meinander, O., Dagsson-Waldhauserova, P., Amosov, P., Aseyeva, E., Atkins, C., Baklanov, A., Baldo, C., Barr, S. L., Barzycka, B., Benning, L. G., Cvetkovic, B., Enchilik, P., Frolov, D., Gassó, S., Kandler, K., Kasimov, N., Kavan, J., King, J., Koroleva, T., Krupskaya, V., Kulmala, M., Kusiak, M., Lappalainen, H. K., Laska, M., Lasne, J., Lewandowski, M., Luks, B., McQuaid, J. B., Moroni, B., Murray, B., Möhler, O., Nawrot, A., Nickovic, S., O’Neill, N. T., Pejanovic, G., Popovicheva, O., Ranjbar, K., Romanias, M., Samonova, O., Sanchez-Marroquin, A., Schepanski, K., Semenkov, I., Sharapova, A., Shevnina, E., Shi, Z., Sofiev, M., Thevenet, F., Thorsteinsson, T., Timofeev, M., Umo, N. S., Uppstu, A., Urupina, D., Varga, G., Werner, T., Arnalds, O., and Vukovic Vimic, A.: Newly identified climatically and environmentally significant high-latitude dust sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11889–11930, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11889-2022, 2022. 

Mescioglu, E., Paytan, A., Mitchell, B. W., and Griffin, D. W.: Efficiency of bioaerosol samplers: a comparison study, Aerobiologia, 37, 447–459, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-020-09686-0, 2021. 

Morris, C. E., Conen, F., Alex Huffman, J., Phillips, V., Pöschl, U., and Sands, D. C.: Bioprecipitation: a feedback cycle linking Earth history, ecosystem dynamics and land use through biological ice nucleators in the atmosphere, Glob. Change Biol., 20, 341–351, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12447, 2013. 

Mostajir, B., Dolan, J. R., and Rassoulzadegan, F.: A simple method for the quantification of a class of labile marine pico- and nano-sized detritus: DAPI Yellow Particles (DYP), Aquat. Microb. Ecol., 9, 259–266, https://doi.org/10.3354/ame009259, 1995. 

Mu, F., Li, Y., Lu, R., Qi, Y., Xie, W., and Bai, W.: Source identification of airborne bacteria in the mountainous area and the urban areas, Atmos. Res., 231, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104676, 2020. 

Nagarajan, V., Tsai, H.-C., Chen, J.-S., Koner, S., Kumar, R. S., Chao, H.-C., and Hsu, B.-M.: Systematic assessment of mineral distribution and diversity of microbial communities and its interactions in the Taiwan subduction zone of mud volcanoes, Environ. Res., 216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114536, 2023. 

Nie, C., Qiu, Y., Pei, T., and Qin, Y.: Specific Sources Exert Influence on the Community Structures of Bioaerosols, Aerobiology, 2, 72–84, https://doi.org/10.3390/aerobiology2040006, 2024. 

Onyango, L. A. and Alreshidi, M. M.: Adaptive Metabolism in Staphylococci: Survival and Persistence in Environmental and Clinical Settings, Journal of Pathogens, 2018, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1092632, 2018. 

Pedrosa-Silva, F. and Venancio, T. M.: Comparative Genomics Reveals Novel Species and Insights into the Biotechnological Potential, Virulence, and Resistance of Alcaligenes, Genes, 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes14091783, 2023. 

Péguilhan, R., Rossi, F., Joly, M., Nasr, E., Batut, B., Enault, F., Ervens, B., and Amato, P.: Clouds influence the functioning of airborne microorganisms, Biogeosciences, 22, 1257–1275, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1257-2025, 2025. 

Petersson Sjögren, M., Alsved, M., Šantl-Temkiv, T., Bjerring Kristensen, T., and Löndahl, J.: Measurement report: Atmospheric fluorescent bioaerosol concentrations measured during 18 months in a coniferous forest in the south of Sweden, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4977–4992, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4977-2023, 2023. 

Pin, L., Eiler, A., Fazi, S., and Friberg, N.: Two different approaches of microbial community structure characterization in riverine epilithic biofilms under multiple stressors conditions: Developing molecular indicators, Mol. Ecol. Resour., 21, 1200–1215, https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13341, 2021. 

Pogner, C. E., Antunes, C., Apangu, G. P., Bruffaerts, N., Celenk, S., Cristofori, A., Gonzalez Roldan, N., Grinn-Gofron, A., Lara, B., Lika, M., Magyar, D., Martinez-Bracero, M., Muggia, L., Muyshondt, B., O'Connor, D., Pallavicini, A., Marcha Penha, M. A., Perez-Badia, R., Ribeiro, H., Rodrigues Costa, A., Tischner, Z., Xhetani, M., and Ambelas Skjoth, C.: Airborne DNA: State of the art – Established methods and missing pieces in the molecular genetic detection of airborne microorganisms, viruses and plant particles, Sci. Total Environ., 957, 177439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177439, 2024a. 

Pogner, C. E., Antunes, C., Apangu, G. P., Bruffaerts, N., Celenk, S., Cristofori, A., González Roldán, N., Grinn-Gofron´, A., Lara, B., Lika, M., Magyar, D., Martinez-Bracero, M., Muggia, L., Muyshondt, B., O'Connor, D., Pallavicini, A., Marchã Penha, M. A., Pérez-Badia, R., Ribeiro, H., Rodrigues Costa, A., Tischner, Z., Xhetani, M., and Ambelas Skjøth, C.: Airborne DNA: State of the art – Established methods and missing pieces in the molecular genetic detection of airborne microorganisms, viruses and plant particles, Sci. Total Environ., 957, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177439, 2024b. 

Qi, H., Gao, X., Lei, J., Meng, X., and Hu, Z.: Transforming desertification patterns in Asia: Evaluating trends, drivers, and climate change impacts from 1990 to 2022, Ecol. Indic., 161, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111948, 2024. 

Qi, J., Huang, Z., Maki, T., Kang, S., Guo, J., Liu, K., and Liu, Y.: Airborne bacterial communities over the Tibetan and Mongolian Plateaus: variations and their possible sources, Atmos. Res., 247, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.105215, 2021. 

Qi, J., Huang, Z., Xue, F., Gao, Z., Maki, T., Zhang, Z., Liu, K., Ji, M., and Liu, Y.: Aridification alters the diversity of airborne bacteria in drylands of China, Atmos. Environ., 315, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120135, 2023. 

Ramakodi, M. P.: Influence of 16S rRNA reference databases in amplicon-based environmental microbiome research, Biotechnol. Lett., 44, 523–533, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-022-03233-2, 2022. 

Robinson, J. M., Cando-Dumancela, C., Antwis, R. E., Cameron, R., Liddicoat, C., Poudel, R., Weinstein, P., and Breed, M. F.: Exposure to airborne bacteria depends upon vertical stratification and vegetation complexity, Sci. Rep., 11, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89065-y, 2021. 

Safatov, A. S., Andreeva, I. S., Buryak, G. A., Olkin, S. E., Reznikova, I. K., Belan, B. D., Panchenko, M. V., and Simonenkov, D. V.: Long-Term Studies of Biological Components of Atmospheric Aerosol: Trends and Variability, Atmosphere, 13, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13050651, 2022. 

Sajjad, B., Hussain, S., Rasool, K., Hassan, M., and Almomani, F.: Comprehensive insights into advances in ambient bioaerosols sampling, analysis and factors influencing bioaerosols composition, Environ. Pollut., 336, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122473, 2023. 

Samake, A., Uzu, G., Martins, J. M. F., Calas, A., Vince, E., Parat, S., and Jaffrezo, J. L.: The unexpected role of bioaerosols in the Oxidative Potential of PM, Sci. Rep., 7, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-11178-0, 2017. 

Šantl-Temkiv, T., Sikoparija, B., Maki, T., Carotenuto, F., Amato, P., Yao, M., Morris, C. E., Schnell, R., Jaenicke, R., Pöhlker, C., DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., and Huffman, J. A.: Bioaerosol field measurements: Challenges and perspectives in outdoor studies, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 54, 520–546, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1676395, 2019. 

Shammi, M., Rahman, M. M., and Tareq, S. M.: Distribution of Bioaerosols in Association With Particulate Matter: A Review on Emerging Public Health Threat in Asian Megacities, Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.698215, 2021. 

Sharma, B., Singh, B. N., Dwivedi, P., and Rajawat, M. V. S.: Interference of Climate Change on Plant-Microbe Interaction: Present and Future Prospects, Frontiers in Agronomy, 3, https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2021.725804, 2022. 

Su, S.-B., Hashim, J. H., and Yan, C.-h.: Applications of Environmental Epidemiology in Addressing Public Health Challenges in East Asia, BioMed Res. Int., 2015, 1–2, https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/462426, 2015. 

Tang, K., Huang, Z., Huang, J., Maki, T., Zhang, S., Shimizu, A., Ma, X., Shi, J., Bi, J., Zhou, T., Wang, G., and Zhang, L.: Characterization of atmospheric bioaerosols along the transport pathway of Asian dust during the Dust-Bioaerosol 2016 Campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7131–7148, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7131-2018, 2018. 

Tignat-Perrier, R., Dommergue, A., Thollot, A., Keuschnig, C., Magand, O., Vogel, T. M., and Larose, C.: Global airborne microbial communities controlled by surrounding landscapes and wind conditions, Sci. Rep., 9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51073-4, 2019. 

Tseng, W.-L., Chen, Y.-C., Wang, Y.-C., Tseng, H.-Y., and Hsu, H.-H.: Compound spatial extremes of heatwaves and downstream air pollution events in East Asia, Atmos. Res., 312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107772, 2024. 

Uetake, J., Tobo, Y., Uji, Y., Hill, T. C. J., DeMott, P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Misumi, R.: Seasonal Changes of Airborne Bacterial Communities Over Tokyo and Influence of Local Meteorology, Front. Microbiol., 10, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.01572, 2019. 

Van Leuken, J. P. G., Swart, A. N., Havelaar, A. H., Van Pul, A., Van der Hoek, W., and Heederik, D.: Atmospheric dispersion modelling of bioaerosols that are pathogenic to humans and livestock – A review to inform risk assessment studies, Microbial Risk Analysis, 1, 19–39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mran.2015.07.002, 2016. 

Vermote, E. and Program, N. C.: NOAA Climate Data Record (CDR) of AVHRR Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Version 5 (Temporal subset: March 2011–August 2021), NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information [data set], https://doi.org/10.7289/V5ZG6QH9, 2019. 

Xie, W., Li, Y., Bai, W., Hou, J., Ma, T., Zeng, X., Zhang, L., and An, T.: The source and transport of bioaerosols in the air: A review, Front. Env. Sci. Eng., 15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-020-1336-8, 2020. 

Xu, F., Bento, V. A., Qu, Y., and Wang, Q.: Projections of Global Drought and Their Climate Drivers Using CMIP6 Global Climate Models, Water, 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/w15122272, 2023. 

Xue, F., Huang, Z., Huo, X., Dong, Q., Li, Z., and Gu, Q.: The Diversity of Airborne Bacteria Over the Tibet Plateau Decreased by Taklimakan Dust, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, https://doi.org/10.1029/2024gl111830, 2024.  

Yu, T., Xiaole, P., Yujie, J., Yuting, Z., Weijie, Y., Hang, L., Shandong, L., and Zifa, W.: East Asia dust storms in spring 2021: Transport mechanisms and impacts on China, Atmos. Res., 290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106773, 2023. 

Zawadowicz, M. A., Froyd, K. D., Perring, A. E., Murphy, D. M., Spracklen, D. V., Heald, C. L., Buseck, P. R., and Cziczo, D. J.: Model-measurement consistency and limits of bioaerosol abundance over the continental United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13859–13870, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13859-2019, 2019. 

Zhai, H., Yao, J., Wang, G., and Tang, X.: Study of the Effect of Vegetation on Reducing Atmospheric Pollution Particles, Remote Sens., 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14051255, 2022. 

Zhang, J., Li, G., Shi, L., Huang, N., and Shao, Y.: Impact of turbulence on aeolian particle entrainment: results from wind-tunnel experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9525–9535, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9525-2022, 2022a. 

Zhang, L., Liu, T., Zhang, J., Zhu, B., Xiang, D., Zhao, X., and Liu, X.: Bioaerosol Seasonal Variation and Contribution to Airborne Particulate Matter in Huangshi City of Central China, Atmosphere, 13, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060909, 2022b. 

Zhou, S., Xu, Z., Chen, Y., Zhao, M., Li, Y., and Yan, K.: Anthropogenic air pollutants strongly interact with natural aerosols over the eastern China seas: key processes, size distributions, and seasonalities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13597–13619, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13597-2025, 2025. 

Zhou, T., Zhou, X., Yang, Z., Córdoba-Jabonero, C., Wang, Y., Huang, Z., Da, P., Luo, Q., Zhang, Z., Shi, J., Bi, J., and Alikhodja, H.: Transboundary transport of non-east and East Asian dust observed at Dunhuang, northwest China, Atmos. Environ., 318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.120197, 2024. 

Zhou, Y. and Wang, J.: The Composition and Assembly of Soil Microbial Communities Differ across Vegetation Cover Types of Urban Green Spaces, Sustainability, 15, https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713105, 2023. 

Download
Editorial statement
This Data description paper provides an integrated bioaerosol dataset based on a large-scale dust–bioaerosol field campaign conducted across 45 stations in East Asia. It uses unified sampling and analytical methods in sites across China, Japan, South Korea, and Mongolia. Moreover, the in situ data are key to determining relationships with widely-used satellite products. It is a unique dataset of high value to the community and high potential reusability.
Short summary
Bioaerosols exert significant influences on climate, the environment, ecosystems, and public health. This study establishes an integrated bioaerosol dataset across East Asia using unified sampling and analytical methods. It was found that bioaerosol concentrations are negatively correlated with local Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and their relationship with atmospheric temperature is nonlinear. The α-diversity indices were negatively correlated with NDVI.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint