China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Jie Ban
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Qing Wang
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Yayi Zhang
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Yang Yang
Institute of Urban Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration,
Beijing, 100089, China
Shenshen Li
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
Wenjiao Shi
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of
Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy
of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Zhen Zhou
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
School of Marine Technology and Geomatics, Jiangsu Ocean University,
Lianyungang 222000, China
Jiawei Zang
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
School of Marine Technology and Geomatics, Jiangsu Ocean University,
Lianyungang 222000, China
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Viewed
Total article views: 6,303 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,845
1,347
111
6,303
422
121
177
HTML: 4,845
PDF: 1,347
XML: 111
Total: 6,303
Supplement: 422
BibTeX: 121
EndNote: 177
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Total article views: 5,023 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,104
833
86
5,023
248
106
160
HTML: 4,104
PDF: 833
XML: 86
Total: 5,023
Supplement: 248
BibTeX: 106
EndNote: 160
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Feb 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Feb 2022)
Total article views: 1,280 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
741
514
25
1,280
174
15
17
HTML: 741
PDF: 514
XML: 25
Total: 1,280
Supplement: 174
BibTeX: 15
EndNote: 17
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,303 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,190 with geography defined
and 2,113 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,023 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,992 with geography defined
and 2,031 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,280 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,198 with geography defined
and 82 with unknown origin.
We constructed multi-variable random forest models based on 10-fold cross-validation and estimated daily PM2.5 and O3 concentration of China in 2005–2017 at a resolution of 1 km. The daily R2 values of PM2.5 and O3 were 0.85 and 0.77. The meteorological variables can significantly affect both PM2.5 and O3 modeling. During 2005–2017, PM2.5 exhibited an overall downward trend, while O3 experienced the opposite. The temporal trend of PM2.5 and O3 had spatial characteristics during the study period.
We constructed multi-variable random forest models based on 10-fold cross-validation and...
