China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Jie Ban
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Qing Wang
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Yayi Zhang
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Yang Yang
Institute of Urban Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration,
Beijing, 100089, China
Shenshen Li
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
Wenjiao Shi
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of
Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy
of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Zhen Zhou
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
School of Marine Technology and Geomatics, Jiangsu Ocean University,
Lianyungang 222000, China
Jiawei Zang
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
School of Marine Technology and Geomatics, Jiangsu Ocean University,
Lianyungang 222000, China
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Viewed
Total article views: 6,770 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
5,135
1,506
129
6,770
496
144
207
HTML: 5,135
PDF: 1,506
XML: 129
Total: 6,770
Supplement: 496
BibTeX: 144
EndNote: 207
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Total article views: 5,407 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,369
937
101
5,407
298
126
186
HTML: 4,369
PDF: 937
XML: 101
Total: 5,407
Supplement: 298
BibTeX: 126
EndNote: 186
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Feb 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Feb 2022)
Total article views: 1,363 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
766
569
28
1,363
198
18
21
HTML: 766
PDF: 569
XML: 28
Total: 1,363
Supplement: 198
BibTeX: 18
EndNote: 21
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,770 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,647 with geography defined
and 2,123 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,407 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,364 with geography defined
and 2,043 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,363 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,283 with geography defined
and 80 with unknown origin.
We constructed multi-variable random forest models based on 10-fold cross-validation and estimated daily PM2.5 and O3 concentration of China in 2005–2017 at a resolution of 1 km. The daily R2 values of PM2.5 and O3 were 0.85 and 0.77. The meteorological variables can significantly affect both PM2.5 and O3 modeling. During 2005–2017, PM2.5 exhibited an overall downward trend, while O3 experienced the opposite. The temporal trend of PM2.5 and O3 had spatial characteristics during the study period.
We constructed multi-variable random forest models based on 10-fold cross-validation and...
