China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Jie Ban
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Qing Wang
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Yayi Zhang
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Yang Yang
Institute of Urban Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration,
Beijing, 100089, China
Shenshen Li
State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, Aerospace Information Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China
Wenjiao Shi
Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of
Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy
of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Zhen Zhou
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
School of Marine Technology and Geomatics, Jiangsu Ocean University,
Lianyungang 222000, China
Jiawei Zang
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
School of Marine Technology and Geomatics, Jiangsu Ocean University,
Lianyungang 222000, China
China CDC Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health,
National Institute of Environmental Health, Chinese Center for Disease
Control and Prevention, Beijing, 100021, China
Viewed
Total article views: 6,607 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
5,048
1,435
124
6,607
456
134
190
HTML: 5,048
PDF: 1,435
XML: 124
Total: 6,607
Supplement: 456
BibTeX: 134
EndNote: 190
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Total article views: 5,273 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
4,286
891
96
5,273
267
116
170
HTML: 4,286
PDF: 891
XML: 96
Total: 5,273
Supplement: 267
BibTeX: 116
EndNote: 170
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Feb 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Feb 2022)
Total article views: 1,334 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
762
544
28
1,334
189
18
20
HTML: 762
PDF: 544
XML: 28
Total: 1,334
Supplement: 189
BibTeX: 18
EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Sep 2021)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,607 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,495 with geography defined
and 2,112 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,273 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,241 with geography defined
and 2,032 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,334 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,254 with geography defined
and 80 with unknown origin.
We constructed multi-variable random forest models based on 10-fold cross-validation and estimated daily PM2.5 and O3 concentration of China in 2005–2017 at a resolution of 1 km. The daily R2 values of PM2.5 and O3 were 0.85 and 0.77. The meteorological variables can significantly affect both PM2.5 and O3 modeling. During 2005–2017, PM2.5 exhibited an overall downward trend, while O3 experienced the opposite. The temporal trend of PM2.5 and O3 had spatial characteristics during the study period.
We constructed multi-variable random forest models based on 10-fold cross-validation and...
