the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Mapping 20-years winter wheat dynamics in global primary planting areas using Gaussian mixture models with adaptive thresholds
Abstract. Understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of winter wheat is essential for ensuring global food security. Currently, limited research has focused on the global dynamics of wheat over past decades. In this study, we propose a novel framework to map fractional winter wheat dynamics from 2001 to 2020 at 1 km resolution in key global planting areas from MODIS satellite data, utilizing a flexible Gaussian mixture model. We first created the stratified samples of winter wheat fractions at 1 km resolution from multiple public crop datasets, and then developed a robust random forest regression model using MODIS surface reflectance. Subsequently, we estimated the actual wheat cover fractions across different regions and years by analyzing crop mixtures within 1°×1° grids with multiple Gaussian models. The model parameters were utilized to determine optimal thresholds for winter wheat extraction. The performance of our proposed framework was evaluated spatially and temporally, revealing significant insights into global winter wheat dynamics. Results demonstrated that our mapping approach aligns closely with existing local winter wheat maps and statistical data, achieving a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.81 with FAO statistics in primary planting regions and exceeding 0.72 at subnational scales. This study presents the first comprehensive effort to map global winter wheat distribution and dynamics from 2001 to 2020 at a near-global scale. The proposed framework is readily adaptable to other major crops and demonstrates strong agreement with existing maps and statistical records. The resulting high-resolution global winter wheat map series provides valuable inputs for global crop modeling and contributes to achieving the “Zero Hunger”. The product is publicly available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32149033.
- Preprint
(6763 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2103 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2026-347', Anonymous Referee #1, 03 Jun 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2026-347/essd-2026-347-RC1-supplement.pdfCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/essd-2026-347-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2026-347', Anonymous Referee #2, 18 Jul 2026
This manuscript presents a novel framework that integrates 20 years of MODIS data with Random Forest (RF) regression and a Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) to map global winter wheat fractional cover at 1 km resolution. Addressing sub-pixel heterogeneity and mixed-pixel decomposition at a global scale over two decades is highly challenging, and the resulting dataset holds immense potential for crop growth modelling and global yield forecasting. The technical execution shows promise, and the extensive validation effort is commendable. However, in its current form, the manuscript suffers from several methodological gaps and presentation deficiencies that preclude immediate publication. I recommend a revision to address these concerns:
- This study presented an effective approach to solving global mixed-pixel challenges of winter wheat mapping by integrating the GMM with the RF regression model. However, the current methodological description of the GMM, the "adaptive strategy," and the parameter extraction is overly concise. Please revise the manuscript to include mathematical formulations of the GMM and clear algorithmic workflows that explain step by step how the GMM curves are decomposed and how the adaptive parameters are updated.
- The pursuit of an adaptive local thresholding strategy shows a commendable understanding of geographical heterogeneity. Since the ultimate product of this study is a continuous fractional winter wheat map, the need to determine an "optimal threshold" for masking remains unclear. The authors need to explicitly clarify whether this threshold is used merely to exclude low-fraction noise or if it serves a different purpose in the workflow.
- The validation effort across highly diverse agricultural regions in the US, China, and Europe demonstrates the scientific rigor of this work. In Fig. 5, a distinct systematic error is visible for France and Germany, characterized by a noticeable gap in the low-proportion range (0–20%), but it is absent in the US and China. Please provide a more detailed geographical and agricultural explanation for this regional disparity, rather than attributing it to general machine-learning regression biases and data quality issues.
- I recommend adding a dedicated table to outline the specific spectral bands and vegetation indices included in the RF regression model.
- Because this is a global-scale study spanning diverse climate zones, using absolute calendar months to align time-series data may introduce errors; the authors should detail how their model handles the spatial phenological heterogeneity.
- 6. This fractional mapping framework bridges the gap between temporally inconsistent high-resolution binary maps and coarse-resolution mixed pixels. To maximize the impact of this study, please articulate your product's unique value proposition more clearly in the Introduction and Discussion.
- A deep grammatical and stylistic revision is needed throughout the manuscript to correct several typos and awkward expressions. For example, in Section 4.3.3, there is a glaring typographical error: " high 1accuracy..." which should be corrected to "high accuracy."
- There are several mismatches between the figures and their corresponding text citations that must be thoroughly audited. For instance, in Section 4.3.2, the text refers to Fig. 11b; however, there is no sub-figure "11b" in the manuscript.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-347-RC2
Data sets
20-years winter wheat dynamics in global primary planting areas Yanan Wen, Tuo Chen, and Xuecao Li https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32149033
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 138 | 57 | 12 | 207 | 20 | 6 | 8 |
- HTML: 138
- PDF: 57
- XML: 12
- Total: 207
- Supplement: 20
- BibTeX: 6
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1