the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Daily 1 km seamless Antarctic sea ice albedo product from 2012 to 2021 based on VIIRS data
Abstract. Sea ice albedo is a critical parameter for quantifying the energy budget in the Antarctic region. High spatiotemporal resolution sea ice albedo product is essential for Antarctic climate and environmental research. In this study, based on Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) reflectance data, we use the Multiband Reflectance Iteration (MBRI) algorithm to calculate sea ice albedo. This algorithm fully utilizes multi-band observations from single-angle/date observed information to correct the anisotropy of the sea ice surface. Additionally, spatiotemporal information is utilized to reconstruct albedo under cloudy-sky conditions, while correcting for cloud radiative forcing effects. A new daily seamless Antarctic sea ice albedo product with a 1 km resolution is then generated for the period 2012 to 2021. Monte Carlo simulations show that the average retrieval uncertainty of this product is 0.022, with higher uncertainty in backward observations. MBRI albedo product was validated using in situ measurements from Automatic Weather Stations (AWS). The results show that the bias is 0.02, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.071. After upscaling to 25 km resolution and applying a 5-day temporal aggregation, the RMSE decreased to below 0.055. Compared to existing albedo products, the MBRI product exhibits improved spatial continuity due to the reconstruction of cloudy-sky pixels. Statistical analysis shows that albedo under cloudy-sky conditions is higher than under clear-sky conditions (mean difference: 0.035–0.064). The MBRI albedo product can be used to estimate sea ice albedo feedback, energy balance analysis and sea ice monitoring. The latest version of our albedo (version 2) and uncertainty datasets are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11216156 (Ma et al., 2024) and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15067607 (Ma et al., 2025), respectively.
- Preprint
(2941 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 24 Jul 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-79', Georg Heygster, 05 Jun 2025
reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2025-79', Anonymous Referee #2, 09 Jun 2025
reply
This study uses the Multiband Reflectance Iteration (MBRI) algorithm to report sea ice albedo data in the Antarctic region. The accuracy was verified by comparing it with some observations and other products. The description and figures are clear and adequate. However, the structure of the manuscript could be improved. For example, many parts of the Result section are mixture of method and result. Some titles were not suitable.
1 Introduction
L36-37, This sentence is ambiguous.
L59, Blank Line.
2 Date
L85-88, I recommend rewriting this paragraph. Currently, it may be difficult for most readers to understand how these data described in 2.1 were used. Alternatively, move the data section after the methods section.
Sections 2.2 and 2.3 can be combined into one section entitled 'Comparative data'. Then, 2.2.1 Existing Antarctic sea ice albedo products. 2.2.2 In situ measurements. This may be clearer.
4 Result
L310-325, This paragraph is not the result. It should be moved to the 'Method' section. Also, L336-340 is not a result, but rather an introduction.
L371-385, This part is also the method.
L400-411, This part is the preliminary processing of the measured data, not the results.
L439-473, This section should be given a separate title because it is not about validation with in situ measurements.
L439, This study -> This section
Section 4.3, The title I suggest is “Temporal and spatial difference with other products”.
L475, I don’t think this section is “To explore the potential use of albedo in studies of Antarctic sea ice changes”. I recommend paying more attention to the comparison (just like L496-520). The use of present data can be conducted in future works.
5 Discussion
This section looks like a summary of the results. I didn’t see any discussion beyond the results. I recommend adding a discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of the current product and how these affect the accuracy (spatial or temporal). You could also discuss which situations are more suitable for using the present product due to its advantages.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-79-RC2
Data sets
Daily 1 km seamless Antarctic sea ice albedo product from VIIRS data Chao Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11216156
Uncertainty of the daily 1 km seamless Antarctic sea ice albedo product Chao Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15067607
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
204 | 28 | 10 | 242 | 7 | 8 |
- HTML: 204
- PDF: 28
- XML: 10
- Total: 242
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 8
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1