the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Mapping Paddy Rice Distribution and Cropping Intensity in South and Southeast Asia (1995–2024) at 30 m Resolution
Abstract. South and Southeast Asia, a major global hub for paddy rice cultivation, exhibits the highest rice cropping intensity worldwide due to its favourable hydrothermal conditions, and also has experienced considerable spatiotemporal changes due to climate change and anthropogenic activities. However, the absence of long-term spatial distribution and cropping intensity of paddy rice hinders effective agricultural and environmental management. This gap is particularly critical especially in the 21st century, with enhanced impacts from changing climate, water resources, and food trade pattern. Using all the available Landsat and Sentinel-2 archives, we refined a phenology-based algorithm to generate 30-m rice maps and cropping intensity across South and Southeast Asia for the years 1995, 2005, 2015, and 2024. The algorithm overcomes the challenge of detecting rice cropping intensity in long time-series and comprises three core steps: (1) identifying pixel-level rice phenological peaks using an enhanced peak detection method, thereby defining potential transplanting windows and minimizing monsoon-induced cloud and precipitation interference; (2) detecting paddy flooding signals and delineating rice cultivation areas based on phenological rules derived from the relationship between the Land Surface Water Index (LSWI) and Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI); (3) determining rice cropping intensity according to the number of valid crop peaks and associated flooding signals within a single year. The resulting maps were validated using 23,396 samples collectively derived from a field photo library, visual interpretation of Sentinel-1/2 satellite imagery, and a sample migration algorithm. Across the four periods, the maps achieved overall accuracies ranging from 83 % to 87 %. In addition, the resultant products were compared with existing regional and period-specific rice datasets (e.g., NESEA-RICE10 and Open-SEA-Rice-10) for further evaluation. The comparisons demonstrated that the refined approach achieved higher accuracy and robustness in mapping both rice distribution and cropping intensity, whereas the existing products performed well only in partial environments. When compared with the FAO official statistics for South and mainland Southeast Asian countries, the derived maps yielded R² values exceeding 0.9. This dataset holds great potential for applications such as methane emission estimation, water resource management, and crop yield monitoring, thereby supporting sustainable agricultural practices and policy development in the region.
- Preprint
(2194 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(632 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 11 Mar 2026)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-711', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 Jan 2026
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2025-711/essd-2025-711-RC1-supplement.pdfReplyCitation: https://doi.org/
10.5194/essd-2025-711-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Zizhang Zhao, 14 Feb 2026
reply
Dear Referee and Editor,
We are very grateful for the constructive comments and suggested amendments on our manuscript “Mapping Paddy Rice Distribution and Cropping Intensity in South and Southeast Asia (1995–2024) at 30 m Resolution” (MS No.: ESSD-2025-711). We have carefully studied the comments and revised our manuscript accordingly.
Our detailed responses to the comments are provided in the supplement. Please note that all revisions and responses are highlighted in blue font. Modifications in the main manuscript are indicated using italicized text enclosed in quotation marks.
Sincerely,
Zizhang Zhao
on behalf of all co-authors
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Zizhang Zhao, 14 Feb 2026
reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2025-711', Anonymous Referee #2, 17 Feb 2026
reply
This manuscript presents a 30 m resolution dataset of paddy rice spatial distribution and cropping intensity across South and mainland Southeast Asia for the years 1995, 2005, 2015, and 2024, derived from multi-year composites of Landsat and Sentinel-2 imagery using a refined phenology-based approach. The manuscript is generally well-structured, and the authors have compared their results with several existing rice mapping products as well as FAO statistics. However, there are several methodological and validation concerns that need to be addressed.
- The manuscript reports validation using 23,396 samples across four decades. However, only the 2024 samples were manually interpreted, and earlier-year labels were transferred using a sample migration algorithm. While this algorithm is reasonable for constructing historical training data, the migrated samples may not be considered fully independent validation data, as they mainly represent long-term stable pixels and may not capture areas of actual land-use change, such as newly cultivated or abandoned fields. As a result, using them to assess accuracy in earlier years could overestimate algorithm performance.
- The dataset is based on half-monthly NDVI/LSWI/EVI composites and multi-year (3-5 year) compositing to represent individual reference years. While this strategy likely improves data availability and reduces noise, it may also smooth short-duration cropping signals or interannual variability, particularly in regions with triple cropping or short-cycle varieties. Providing additional assessment of temporal aggregation effects would improve confidence in the annual representativeness of the product.
- The manuscript introduces the “enhanced peak detection” and “false peak elimination” methods. It is suggested to include quantitative comparisons with existing phenology-based approaches.
- Key parameters, including Whittaker smoothing (λ = 300), minimum season length (120 days), and many thresholds, are applied uniformly across all regions, years, and management regimes. Such uniform choices may fail to capture short-duration varieties or respond appropriately to differences in irrigation practices and cropping calendars. These parameters raise concerns regarding the method’s transferability across regions, years, and management conditions.
- The manuscript constructs custom composites of Landsat and Sentinel-2 imagery instead of using the Harmonized Landsat Sentinel-2 (HLS) product. It is suggested to clarify whether this choice affects paddy rice spatial distribution and cropping intensity detection.
- The dataset could be further enhanced by including additional confidence or uncertainty layers, considering potential downstream applications.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-711-RC2
Data sets
Mapping Paddy Rice Distribution and Cropping Intensity in South and Southeast Asia (1995 - 2024) at 30m Resolution Zizhang Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17615341
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 209 | 211 | 16 | 436 | 46 | 14 | 19 |
- HTML: 209
- PDF: 211
- XML: 16
- Total: 436
- Supplement: 46
- BibTeX: 14
- EndNote: 19
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1