102 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Successive and automated stable isotope analysis of CO2, CH4 and N2O paving the way for unmanned aerial vehicle‐based sampling S. Leitner et al. 10.1002/rcm.8929
2. Improved Constraints on Global Methane Emissions and Sinks Using δ13C‐CH4 X. Lan et al. 10.1029/2021GB007000
3. Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories B. Neininger et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0458
4. Emissions from the Oil and Gas Sectors, Coal Mining and Ruminant Farming Drive Methane Growth over the Past Three Decades N. CHANDRA et al. 10.2151/jmsj.2021-015
5. Ideas and perspectives: is shale gas a major driver of recent increase in global atmospheric methane? R. Howarth 10.5194/bg-16-3033-2019
6. Isotopic evidence for quasi-equilibrium chemistry in thermally mature natural gases N. Thiagarajan et al. 10.1073/pnas.1906507117
7. Methane in Gas Shows from Boreholes in Epigenetic Permafrost of Siberian Arctic G. Kraev et al. 10.3390/geosciences9020067
8. Investigation and optimization of methane purification method for natural gas by two-column gas chromatography: A preliminary test for doubly substituted isotopologue (13CH3D) measurements T. Sun et al. 10.3389/fmars.2023.969567
9. Influence of Sedimentary Environment Evolution on Fingerprint Characteristics of Methane Isotopes: A Case Study From Hangzhou Bay W. Jiang et al. 10.1029/2022JG007357
10. Anthropogenic emission is the main contributor to the rise of atmospheric methane during 1993–2017 Z. Zhang et al. 10.1093/nsr/nwab200
11. Continuous CH<sub>4</sub> and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> measurements in London demonstrate under-reported natural gas leakage E. Saboya et al. 10.5194/acp-22-3595-2022
12. Method of assessment generation efficiency at thermal power plants taking into account emissions of pollutants M. Ziganshin 10.30724/1998-9903-2019-21-6-29-38
13. Isotopic signatures of methane emissions from tropical fires, agriculture and wetlands: the MOYA and ZWAMPS flights E. Nisbet et al. 10.1098/rsta.2021.0112
14. δ 13 C methane source signatures from tropical wetland and rice field emissions J. France et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0449
15. Assessment of the theoretical limit in instrumental detectability of northern high-latitude methane sources using <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C<sub>CH4</sub> atmospheric signals T. Thonat et al. 10.5194/acp-19-12141-2019
16. Old carbon reservoirs were not important in the deglacial methane budget M. Dyonisius et al. 10.1126/science.aax0504
17. Gaps in network infrastructure limit our understanding of biogenic methane emissions for the United States S. Malone et al. 10.5194/bg-19-2507-2022
18. Quantifying Methane and Ethane Emissions to the Atmosphere From Central and Western U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Production Regions J. Peischl et al. 10.1029/2018JD028622
19. Methane Mitigation: Methods to Reduce Emissions, on the Path to the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. 10.1029/2019RG000675
20. The relationship between phosphine, methane, and ozone over paddy field in Guangzhou, China J. Ma et al. 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00581
21. Mapping Urban Methane Sources in Paris, France S. Defratyka et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c00859
22. Methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) sources in Krakow, Poland: insights from isotope analysis M. Menoud et al. 10.5194/acp-21-13167-2021
23. Carbon isotopic characterisation and oxidation of UK landfill methane emissions by atmospheric measurements S. Bakkaloglu et al. 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.012
24. New contributions of measurements in Europe to the global inventory of the stable isotopic composition of methane M. Menoud et al. 10.5194/essd-14-4365-2022
25. Methane sources from waste and natural gas sectors detected in Pune, India, by concentration and isotopic analysis A. Metya et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156721
26. Variational inverse modeling within the Community Inversion Framework v1.1 to assimilate <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C(CH<sub>4</sub>) and CH<sub>4</sub>: a case study with model LMDz-SACS J. Thanwerdas et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-4831-2022
27. Facility level measurement of offshore oil and gas installations from a medium-sized airborne platform: method development for quantification and source identification of methane emissions J. France et al. 10.5194/amt-14-71-2021
28. Isotopic characterisation and mobile detection of methane emissions in a heterogeneous UK landscape M. Takriti et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119774
29. Identifying under-characterized atmospheric methane emission sources in Western Maryland H. Li et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117053
30. Origins of hydrocarbons in the Geneva Basin: insights from oil, gas and source rock organic geochemistry D. Do Couto et al. 10.1186/s00015-021-00388-4
31. Interlaboratory comparison of <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C and <i>δ</i>D measurements of atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> for combined use of data sets from different laboratories T. Umezawa et al. 10.5194/amt-11-1207-2018
32. Methane mapping, emission quantification, and attribution in two European cities: Utrecht (NL) and Hamburg (DE) H. Maazallahi et al. 10.5194/acp-20-14717-2020
33. Stable Carbon Isotope Signature of Methane Released From Phytoplankton T. Klintzsch et al. 10.1029/2023GL103317
34. Global and Regional CH4 Emissions for 1995–2013 Derived From Atmospheric CH4, δ13C‐CH4, and δD‐CH4 Observations and a Chemical Transport Model R. Fujita et al. 10.1029/2020JD032903
35. Isotopic signatures of major methane sources in the coal seam gas fields and adjacent agricultural districts, Queensland, Australia X. Lu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10527-2021
36. The impact of spatially varying wetland source signatures on the atmospheric variability ofδD-CH4 A. Stell et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0442
37. Temporal Variations of the Mole Fraction, Carbon, and Hydrogen Isotope Ratios of Atmospheric Methane in the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Canada R. Fujita et al. 10.1002/2017JD027972
38. CH4 isotopic signatures of emissions from oil and gas extraction sites in Romania M. Menoud et al. 10.1525/elementa.2021.00092
39. Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. 10.1029/2018GB006009
40. Accelerating methane growth rate from 2010 to 2017: leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia Y. Yin et al. 10.5194/acp-21-12631-2021
41. Lubricating Oil Consumption Measurement on Large Gas Engines B. Rossegger et al. 10.3390/lubricants10030040
42. Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. 10.1029/2018GB006065
43. Methane clumped isotopes in the Songliao Basin (China): New insights into abiotic vs. biotic hydrocarbon formation Y. Shuai et al. 10.1016/j.epsl.2017.10.057
44. Street-level methane emissions of Bucharest, Romania and the dominance of urban wastewater. J. Fernandez et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100153
45. Gridded maps of geological methane emissions and their isotopic signature G. Etiope et al. 10.5194/essd-11-1-2019
46. Methoxyl stable isotopic constraints on the origins and limits of coal-bed methane M. Lloyd et al. 10.1126/science.abg0241
47. Theoretical principles and application to measure the flux of carbon dioxide in the air of urban zones R. Di Martino & S. Gurrieri 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119302
48. Bayesian Analysis of the Glacial‐Interglacial Methane Increase Constrained by Stable Isotopes and Earth System Modeling P. Hopcroft et al. 10.1002/2018GL077382
49. Identification, spatial extent and distribution of fugitive gas migration on the well pad scale O. Forde et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.217
50. Using global isotopic data to constrain the role of shale gas production in recent increases in atmospheric methane A. Milkov et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-61035-w
51. Improved global wetland carbon isotopic signatures support post-2006 microbial methane emission increase Y. Oh et al. 10.1038/s43247-022-00488-5
52. Stable isotopic signatures of methane from waste sources through atmospheric measurements S. Bakkaloglu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119021
53. Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero E. Nisbet et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0457
54. Quantifying fossil fuel methane emissions using observations of atmospheric ethane and an uncertain emission ratio A. Ramsden et al. 10.5194/acp-22-3911-2022
55. Natural gas of radiolytic origin: An overlooked component of shale gas M. Naumenko-Dèzes et al. 10.1073/pnas.2114720119
56. Flaring efficiencies and NOx emission ratios measured for offshore oil and gas facilities in the North Sea J. Shaw et al. 10.5194/acp-23-1491-2023
57. Environmental baseline monitoring for shale gas development in the UK: Identification and geochemical characterisation of local source emissions of methane to atmosphere D. Lowry et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134600
58. A Cryogen-Free Automated Measurement System of Stable Carbon Isotope Ratio of Atmospheric Methane T. Umezawa et al. 10.2151/jmsj.2020-007
59. Bottom‐Up Evaluation of the Methane Budget in Asia and Its Subregions A. Ito et al. 10.1029/2023GB007723
60. Measurement report: Atmospheric CH4 at regional stations of the Korea Meteorological Administration–Global Atmosphere Watch Programme: measurement, characteristics, and long-term changes of its drivers H. Lee et al. 10.5194/acp-23-7141-2023
61. Large Hydrogen Isotope Fractionation Distinguishes Nitrogenase-Derived Methane from Other Methane Sources K. Luxem et al. 10.1128/AEM.00849-20
62. Atmospheric Methane: Comparison Between Methane's Record in 2006–2022 and During Glacial Terminations E. Nisbet et al. 10.1029/2023GB007875
63. Isotope composition of carbon dioxide and methane in a tropical urban atmosphere K. Carballo-Chaves et al. 10.1080/10256016.2020.1803855
64. Potential of Clumped Isotopes in Constraining the Global Atmospheric Methane Budget E. Chung & T. Arnold 10.1029/2020GB006883
65. Strong sensitivity of the isotopic composition of methane to the plausible range of tropospheric chlorine S. Strode et al. 10.5194/acp-20-8405-2020
66. Bottom water methane sources along the high latitude eastern Canadian continental shelf and their effects on the marine carbonate system S. Punshon et al. 10.1016/j.marchem.2019.04.004
67. Investigating large methane enhancements in the U.S. San Juan Basin G. Pétron et al. 10.1525/elementa.038
68. Revised genetic diagrams for natural gases based on a global dataset of >20,000 samples A. Milkov & G. Etiope 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.09.002
69. Methane Emissions from Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms in the Gulf of Mexico T. Yacovitch et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b07148
70. Hydrocarbon Gases in Seafloor Sediments of the Edge Shelf Zone of the East Siberian Sea and Adjacent Part of the Arctic Ocean A. Yatsuk et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.856496
71. A Structured Approach for the Mitigation of Natural Methane Emissions—Lessons Learned from Anthropogenic Emissions J. Johannisson & M. Hiete 10.3390/c6020024
72. Rapid change of the Arctic climate system and its global influences - Overview of GRENE Arctic climate change research project (2011–2016) T. Yamanouchi & K. Takata 10.1016/j.polar.2020.100548
73. The Earth's atmosphere – A stable isotope perspective and review J. Hoefs & R. Harmon 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105355
74. The Role of Emission Sources and Atmospheric Sink in the Seasonal Cycle of CH4 and δ13-CH4: Analysis Based on the Atmospheric Chemistry Transport Model TM5 V. Kangasaho et al. 10.3390/atmos13060888
75. Revisiting enteric methane emissions from domestic ruminants and their δ13CCH4 source signature J. Chang et al. 10.1038/s41467-019-11066-3
76. In situ observations of greenhouse gases over Europe during the CoMet 1.0 campaign aboard the HALO aircraft M. Gałkowski et al. 10.5194/amt-14-1525-2021
77. Ship-Borne Observations of Atmospheric CH4 and δ13C Isotope Signature in Methane over Arctic Seas in Summer and Autumn 2021 N. Pankratova et al. 10.3390/atmos13030458
78. Monitoring methane emissions from oil and gas operations‡ W. Collins et al. 10.1364/OE.464421
79. Analysis of regional CO2 contributions at the high Alpine observatory Jungfraujoch by means of atmospheric transport simulations and δ13C S. Pieber et al. 10.5194/acp-22-10721-2022
80. Sediment-hosted geothermal systems: Review and first global mapping M. Procesi et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.03.020
81. Geochemistry and age of groundwater in the Williston Basin, USA: Assessing potential effects of shale-oil production on groundwater quality P. McMahon et al. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2020.104833
82. Ethane measurement by Picarro CRDS G2201-i in laboratory and field conditions: potential and limitations S. Defratyka et al. 10.5194/amt-14-5049-2021
83. Geographic variability in freshwater methane hydrogen isotope ratios and its implications for global isotopic source signatures P. Douglas et al. 10.5194/bg-18-3505-2021
84. Atmospheric data support a multi-decadal shift in the global methane budget towards natural tropical emissions A. Drinkwater et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8429-2023
85. Using ship-borne observations of methane isotopic ratio in the Arctic Ocean to understand methane sources in the Arctic A. Berchet et al. 10.5194/acp-20-3987-2020
86. Atmospheric methane isotopes identify inventory knowledge gaps in the Surat Basin, Australia, coal seam gas and agricultural regions B. Kelly et al. 10.5194/acp-22-15527-2022
87. Global Atmospheric δ13CH4 and CH4 Trends for 2000–2020 from the Atmospheric Transport Model TM5 Using CH4 from Carbon Tracker Europe–CH4 Inversions V. Mannisenaho et al. 10.3390/atmos14071121
88. Using carbon-14 and carbon-13 measurements for source attribution of atmospheric methane in the Athabasca oil sands region R. Gonzalez Moguel et al. 10.5194/acp-22-2121-2022
89. Methane Concentration and δ13C Isotopic Signature in Methane over Arctic Seas in Summer and Autumn 2020 N. Pankratova et al. 10.1134/S0001437022060108
90. What do we know about the global methane budget? Results from four decades of atmospheric CH 4 observations and the way forward X. Lan et al. 10.1098/rsta.2020.0440
91. An improved method for mobile characterisation of <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> source signatures and its application in Germany A. Hoheisel et al. 10.5194/amt-12-1123-2019
92. Impact on air quality of carbon and sulfur volatile compounds emitted from hydrothermal discharges: The case study of Pisciarelli (Campi Flegrei, South Italy) R. Biagi et al. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134166
93. How do Cl concentrations matter for the simulation of CH4 and δ13C(CH4) and estimation of the CH4 budget through atmospheric inversions? J. Thanwerdas et al. 10.5194/acp-22-15489-2022
94. Identification of Potential Methane Source Regions in Europe Using δ13CCH4 Measurements and Trajectory Modeling T. Varga et al. 10.1029/2020JD033963
95. Variations of methane stable isotopic values from an Alpine peatland on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Q. Guo et al. 10.1007/s11631-021-00477-z
96. Discrepancy between simulated and observed ethane and propane levels explained by underestimated fossil emissions S. Dalsøren et al. 10.1038/s41561-018-0073-0
97. Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane A. Turner et al. 10.1073/pnas.1814297116
98. Monitoring Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations W. Collins et al. 10.1103/PRXEnergy.1.017001
99. Seasonal and diurnal variations of greenhouse gases in Florence (Italy): Inferring sources and sinks from carbon isotopic ratios S. Venturi et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134245
100. The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget P. Palmer et al. 10.1098/rsta.2021.0106
101. Predicting isotopologue abundances in the products of organic catagenesis with a kinetic Monte-Carlo model H. Xie et al. 10.1016/j.gca.2022.03.028
102. Variability and quasi-decadal changes in the methane budget over the period 2000–2012 M. Saunois et al. 10.5194/acp-17-11135-2017