143 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Developing calibration and measurement capabilities for atmospheric CH4 stable isotope ratios at NMIs/DIs: metrology for global comparability A. Srivastava et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/adcfa8
2. Successive and automated stable isotope analysis of CO2, CH4 and N2O paving the way for unmanned aerial vehicle‐based sampling S. Leitner et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.8929
3. Tracing anthropogenic climate and environmental change using stable isotopes A. Smith & J. Lacey https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2024.109028
4. Clumped isotopes tracing methane cycle and budget: a review X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105349
5. Improved Constraints on Global Methane Emissions and Sinks Using δ13C‐CH4 X. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007000
6. The challenge of estimating global termite methane emissions S. Law et al. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.17390
7. Microbial driver of 2006–2023 CH 4 growth indicated by trends in atmospheric δD–CH 4 and δ 13 C–CH 4 B. Riddell-Young et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2516543122
8. Coal seam gas industry methane emissions in the Surat Basin, Australia: comparing airborne measurements with inventories B. Neininger et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0458
9. Emissions from the Oil and Gas Sectors, Coal Mining and Ruminant Farming Drive Methane Growth over the Past Three Decades N. CHANDRA et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2021-015
10. Ideas and perspectives: is shale gas a major driver of recent increase in global atmospheric methane? R. Howarth https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3033-2019
11. Isotopic evidence for quasi-equilibrium chemistry in thermally mature natural gases N. Thiagarajan et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1906507117
12. Methane in Gas Shows from Boreholes in Epigenetic Permafrost of Siberian Arctic G. Kraev et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9020067
13. Identification of natural gas leak sources using ethane/methane ratios and methane isotopic signatures Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100434
14. Investigation and optimization of methane purification method for natural gas by two-column gas chromatography: A preliminary test for doubly substituted isotopologue (13CH3D) measurements T. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.969567
15. Influence of Sedimentary Environment Evolution on Fingerprint Characteristics of Methane Isotopes: A Case Study From Hangzhou Bay W. Jiang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JG007357
16. Anthropogenic emission is the main contributor to the rise of atmospheric methane during 1993–2017 Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwab200
17. Continuous CH4 and δ13CH4 measurements in London demonstrate under-reported natural gas leakage E. Saboya et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3595-2022
18. Method of assessment generation efficiency at thermal power plants taking into account emissions of pollutants M. Ziganshin https://doi.org/10.30724/1998-9903-2019-21-6-29-38
19. Isotopic signatures of methane emissions from tropical fires, agriculture and wetlands: the MOYA and ZWAMPS flights E. Nisbet et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0112
20. Source apportionment of methane emissions from the Upper Silesian Coal Basin using isotopic signatures A. Fiehn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15749-2023
21. Stable carbon isotopes of methane reveal that the central Arctic Ocean is a potential sink of atmospheric methane W. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70299
22. δ 13 C methane source signatures from tropical wetland and rice field emissions J. France et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0449
23. Using in situ measurements of δ13C in methane to investigate methane emissions from the western Canada sedimentary basin S. Ars et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100286
24. Assessment of the theoretical limit in instrumental detectability of northern high-latitude methane sources using δ13CCH4 atmospheric signals T. Thonat et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12141-2019
25. Old carbon reservoirs were not important in the deglacial methane budget M. Dyonisius et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0504
26. Understanding coalbed gas distribution from longwall mining: Geochemical and isotopic approach Y. Bezyk et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2025.104859
27. Components and stable carbon isotopic fractionation mechanisms of over-mature coal-derived gas in the Daji gas field, Ordos Basin, NW China J. LI et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(26)60699-4
28. Gaps in network infrastructure limit our understanding of biogenic methane emissions for the United States S. Malone et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-2507-2022
29. Quantifying Methane and Ethane Emissions to the Atmosphere From Central and Western U.S. Oil and Natural Gas Production Regions J. Peischl et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028622
30. Methane Mitigation: Methods to Reduce Emissions, on the Path to the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000675
31. The hyporheic exchange remarkably influences methane dynamics and effluxes in rivers C. Gu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.132400
32. The relationship between phosphine, methane, and ozone over paddy field in Guangzhou, China J. Ma et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00581
33. Mapping Urban Methane Sources in Paris, France S. Defratyka et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c00859
34. Methane (CH4) sources in Krakow, Poland: insights from isotope analysis M. Menoud et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13167-2021
35. Six years of continuous carbon isotope composition measurements of methane in Heidelberg (Germany) – a study of source contributions and comparison to emission inventories A. Hoheisel & M. Schmidt https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2951-2024
36. Global termite methane emissions have been affected by climate and land-use changes A. Ito https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44529-1
37. Carbon isotopic characterisation and oxidation of UK landfill methane emissions by atmospheric measurements S. Bakkaloglu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.07.012
38. New contributions of measurements in Europe to the global inventory of the stable isotopic composition of methane M. Menoud et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4365-2022
39. Methane sources from waste and natural gas sectors detected in Pune, India, by concentration and isotopic analysis A. Metya et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156721
40. Variational inverse modeling within the Community Inversion Framework v1.1 to assimilate δ13C(CH4) and CH4: a case study with model LMDz-SACS J. Thanwerdas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4831-2022
41. Facility level measurement of offshore oil and gas installations from a medium-sized airborne platform: method development for quantification and source identification of methane emissions J. France et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-71-2021
42. Isotopic characterisation and mobile detection of methane emissions in a heterogeneous UK landscape M. Takriti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119774
43. Identifying under-characterized atmospheric methane emission sources in Western Maryland H. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117053
44. Gas emissions from the Sulphur Bank Mercury Mine hydrothermal system, Clear Lake volcanic field, California J. Lewicki et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2025.108453
45. Atmospheric methane variability through the Last Glacial Maximum and deglaciation mainly controlled by tropical sources B. Riddell-Young et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01332-x
46. Origins of hydrocarbons in the Geneva Basin: insights from oil, gas and source rock organic geochemistry D. Do Couto et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s00015-021-00388-4
47. Interlaboratory comparison of δ13C and δD measurements of atmospheric CH4 for combined use of data sets from different laboratories T. Umezawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1207-2018
48. Methane mapping, emission quantification, and attribution in two European cities: Utrecht (NL) and Hamburg (DE) H. Maazallahi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14717-2020
49. Measurement report: Isotopic composition of CH4 emitted from gas exploration sites in the Transylvanian Basin, Romania T. Röckmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-723-2026
50. Stable Carbon Isotope Signature of Methane Released From Phytoplankton T. Klintzsch et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL103317
51. The key role of bathyarchaeota in methane metabolism within coastal ecosystems S. Zhong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2026.104991
52. Global and Regional CH4 Emissions for 1995–2013 Derived From Atmospheric CH4, δ13C‐CH4, and δD‐CH4 Observations and a Chemical Transport Model R. Fujita et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032903
53. Isotopic signatures of major methane sources in the coal seam gas fields and adjacent agricultural districts, Queensland, Australia X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10527-2021
54. The impact of spatially varying wetland source signatures on the atmospheric variability ofδD-CH4 A. Stell et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0442
55. Geologic sources and well integrity impact methane emissions from orphaned and abandoned oil and gas wells N. Gianoutsos et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169584
56. Global inventory of doubly substituted isotopologues of methane (Δ13CH3D and Δ12CH2D2) S. Defratyka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-6889-2025
57. Temporal Variations of the Mole Fraction, Carbon, and Hydrogen Isotope Ratios of Atmospheric Methane in the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Canada R. Fujita et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027972
58. CH4 isotopic signatures of emissions from oil and gas extraction sites in Romania M. Menoud et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00092
59. Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement E. Nisbet et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006009
60. Accelerating methane growth rate from 2010 to 2017: leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia Y. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12631-2021
61. Lubricating Oil Consumption Measurement on Large Gas Engines B. Rossegger et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants10030040
62. Bottom-up characterization of geologic methane emissions in the San Juan Basin in the southwestern USA M. Scholer et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2025.00061
63. Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006065
64. Methane clumped isotopes in the Songliao Basin (China): New insights into abiotic vs. biotic hydrocarbon formation Y. Shuai et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2017.10.057
65. Street-level methane emissions of Bucharest, Romania and the dominance of urban wastewater. J. Fernandez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100153
66. Gridded maps of geological methane emissions and their isotopic signature G. Etiope et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1-2019
67. Methoxyl stable isotopic constraints on the origins and limits of coal-bed methane M. Lloyd et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg0241
68. Theoretical principles and application to measure the flux of carbon dioxide in the air of urban zones R. Di Martino & S. Gurrieri https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119302
69. Stable isotope equilibria in the dihydrogen-water-methane-ethane-propane system. Part 2: Experimental determination of hydrogen isotopic equilibrium for ethane-H2 from 30 to 200 °C and propane-H2 from 75 to 200 °C A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2025.02.033
70. Bayesian Analysis of the Glacial‐Interglacial Methane Increase Constrained by Stable Isotopes and Earth System Modeling P. Hopcroft et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2018GL077382
71. Identification, spatial extent and distribution of fugitive gas migration on the well pad scale O. Forde et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.217
72. Using global isotopic data to constrain the role of shale gas production in recent increases in atmospheric methane A. Milkov et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61035-w
73. Improved global wetland carbon isotopic signatures support post-2006 microbial methane emission increase Y. Oh et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00488-5
74. Stable isotopic signatures of methane from waste sources through atmospheric measurements S. Bakkaloglu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119021
75. Atmospheric methane and nitrous oxide: challenges alongthe path to Net Zero E. Nisbet et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0457
76. Quantifying fossil fuel methane emissions using observations of atmospheric ethane and an uncertain emission ratio A. Ramsden et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3911-2022
77. Natural gas of radiolytic origin: An overlooked component of shale gas M. Naumenko-Dèzes et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2114720119
78. Flaring efficiencies and NOx emission ratios measured for offshore oil and gas facilities in the North Sea J. Shaw et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1491-2023
79. Environmental baseline monitoring for shale gas development in the UK: Identification and geochemical characterisation of local source emissions of methane to atmosphere D. Lowry et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134600
80. A Cryogen-Free Automated Measurement System of Stable Carbon Isotope Ratio of Atmospheric Methane T. Umezawa et al. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2020-007
81. Temporal variations of δ13C-CH4 in rice paddies dominated by the plant-mediated pathway J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.112886
82. Bottom‐Up Evaluation of the Methane Budget in Asia and Its Subregions A. Ito et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007723
83. Measurement report: Atmospheric CH4 at regional stations of the Korea Meteorological Administration–Global Atmosphere Watch Programme: measurement, characteristics, and long-term changes of its drivers H. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7141-2023
84. Large Hydrogen Isotope Fractionation Distinguishes Nitrogenase-Derived Methane from Other Methane Sources K. Luxem et al. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00849-20
85. Atmospheric Methane: Comparison Between Methane's Record in 2006–2022 and During Glacial Terminations E. Nisbet et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007875
86. Anaerobic oxidation of methane from abandoned oil and gas wells leaking into aquifers S. Shaheen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2025.08.039
87. Isotope composition of carbon dioxide and methane in a tropical urban atmosphere K. Carballo-Chaves et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2020.1803855
88. Potential of Clumped Isotopes in Constraining the Global Atmospheric Methane Budget E. Chung & T. Arnold https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006883
89. Strong sensitivity of the isotopic composition of methane to the plausible range of tropospheric chlorine S. Strode et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8405-2020
90. Bottom water methane sources along the high latitude eastern Canadian continental shelf and their effects on the marine carbonate system S. Punshon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2019.04.004
91. Investigating large methane enhancements in the U.S. San Juan Basin G. Pétron et al. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.038
92. Revised genetic diagrams for natural gases based on a global dataset of >20,000 samples A. Milkov & G. Etiope https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2018.09.002
93. Methane Emissions from Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms in the Gulf of Mexico T. Yacovitch et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07148
94. Hydrocarbon Gases in Seafloor Sediments of the Edge Shelf Zone of the East Siberian Sea and Adjacent Part of the Arctic Ocean A. Yatsuk et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.856496
95. A Structured Approach for the Mitigation of Natural Methane Emissions—Lessons Learned from Anthropogenic Emissions J. Johannisson & M. Hiete https://doi.org/10.3390/c6020024
96. Trends in atmospheric methane concentrations since 1990 were driven and modified by anthropogenic emissions R. Skeie et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00969-1
97. Methane emissions decreased in fossil fuel exploitation and sustainably increased in microbial source sectors during 1990–2020 N. Chandra et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01286-x
98. Theoretical and experimental constraints on hydrogen isotope equilibrium in C1-C5 alkanes H. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2024.08.023
99. Rapid change of the Arctic climate system and its global influences - Overview of GRENE Arctic climate change research project (2011–2016) T. Yamanouchi & K. Takata https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polar.2020.100548
100. Dense and diverse regional methane sources characterized using a tiered, dual-tracer measurement strategy A. Moyes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121270
101. The Earth's atmosphere – A stable isotope perspective and review J. Hoefs & R. Harmon https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2022.105355
102. The Role of Emission Sources and Atmospheric Sink in the Seasonal Cycle of CH4 and δ13-CH4: Analysis Based on the Atmospheric Chemistry Transport Model TM5 V. Kangasaho et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060888
103. Revisiting enteric methane emissions from domestic ruminants and their δ13CCH4 source signature J. Chang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11066-3
104. Extraction, purification, and clumped isotope analysis of methane (Δ13CDH3 and Δ12CD2H2) from sources and the atmosphere M. Sivan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-2687-2024
105. In situ observations of greenhouse gases over Europe during the CoMet 1.0 campaign aboard the HALO aircraft M. Gałkowski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1525-2021
106. Ship-Borne Observations of Atmospheric CH4 and δ13C Isotope Signature in Methane over Arctic Seas in Summer and Autumn 2021 N. Pankratova et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030458
107. Monitoring methane emissions from oil and gas operations‡ W. Collins et al. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.464421
108. Analysis of regional CO2 contributions at the high Alpine observatory Jungfraujoch by means of atmospheric transport simulations and δ13C S. Pieber et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10721-2022
109. Microbial contribution estimated by clumped isotopologues (13CH3D and 12CH2D2) characteristics in a CO2 enhanced coal bed methane reservoir X. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170926
110. Investigation of the renewed methane growth post-2007 with high-resolution 3-D variational inverse modeling and isotopic constraints J. Thanwerdas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2129-2024
111. Methane Clumped Isotopologue Variability from Ebullition in a Mid-latitude Lake E. Lalk et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.3c00282
112. Sediment-hosted geothermal systems: Review and first global mapping M. Procesi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.03.020
113. Stable Isotope Approach to Assess the Production and Consumption of Methylphosphonate and Its Contribution to Oxic Methane Formation in Surface Waters M. Kanwischer et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c04098
114. Geochemistry and age of groundwater in the Williston Basin, USA: Assessing potential effects of shale-oil production on groundwater quality P. McMahon et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2020.104833
115. Ethane measurement by Picarro CRDS G2201-i in laboratory and field conditions: potential and limitations S. Defratyka et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5049-2021
116. Methane-rich gas emissions from natural geologic seeps can be chemically distinguished from anthropogenic leaks L. Molofsky et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01990-8
117. Geographic variability in freshwater methane hydrogen isotope ratios and its implications for global isotopic source signatures P. Douglas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3505-2021
118. Atmospheric data support a multi-decadal shift in the global methane budget towards natural tropical emissions A. Drinkwater et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8429-2023
119. Increased methane emissions from oil and gas following the Soviet Union’s collapse T. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314600121
120. Using ship-borne observations of methane isotopic ratio in the Arctic Ocean to understand methane sources in the Arctic A. Berchet et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3987-2020
121. Atmospheric methane isotopes identify inventory knowledge gaps in the Surat Basin, Australia, coal seam gas and agricultural regions B. Kelly et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15527-2022
122. Global Atmospheric δ13CH4 and CH4 Trends for 2000–2020 from the Atmospheric Transport Model TM5 Using CH4 from Carbon Tracker Europe–CH4 Inversions V. Mannisenaho et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071121
123. Natural isotope fingerprinting of produced hydrogen and its potential applications to the hydrogen economy J. Gibson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.04.077
124. Using carbon-14 and carbon-13 measurements for source attribution of atmospheric methane in the Athabasca oil sands region R. Gonzalez Moguel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2121-2022
125. Methane Concentration and δ13C Isotopic Signature in Methane over Arctic Seas in Summer and Autumn 2020 N. Pankratova et al. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0001437022060108
126. The Clumped Isotope Signatures of Multiple Methanogenic Metabolisms J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c03255
127. Abrupt changes in biomass burning during the last glacial period B. Riddell-Young et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08363-3
128. What do we know about the global methane budget? Results from four decades of atmospheric CH4observations and the way forward X. Lan et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0440
129. An improved method for mobile characterisation of δ13CH4 source signatures and its application in Germany A. Hoheisel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1123-2019
130. Impact on air quality of carbon and sulfur volatile compounds emitted from hydrothermal discharges: The case study of Pisciarelli (Campi Flegrei, South Italy) R. Biagi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134166
131. How do Cl concentrations matter for the simulation of CH4 and δ13C(CH4) and estimation of the CH4 budget through atmospheric inversions? J. Thanwerdas et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15489-2022
132. Identification of Potential Methane Source Regions in Europe Using δ13CCH4 Measurements and Trajectory Modeling T. Varga et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033963
133. Identification of Sources of Methane in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam C. Woolley Maisch et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00034
134. A comprehensive atmospheric emissions inventory for major Brazilian industrial sectors: a bottom-up approach with spatial distribution analysis C. Ibagué-Rey et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2025.2560588
135. Variations of methane stable isotopic values from an Alpine peatland on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Q. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-021-00477-z
136. Discrepancy between simulated and observed ethane and propane levels explained by underestimated fossil emissions S. Dalsøren et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0073-0
137. Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116
138. Monitoring Methane Emissions from Oil and Gas Operations W. Collins et al. https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXEnergy.1.017001
139. Seasonal and diurnal variations of greenhouse gases in Florence (Italy): Inferring sources and sinks from carbon isotopic ratios S. Venturi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134245
140. The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget P. Palmer et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0106
141. Predicting isotopologue abundances in the products of organic catagenesis with a kinetic Monte-Carlo model H. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2022.03.028
142. New insights in atmospheric methane variability in the Arctic by ship-borne measurements during MOSAiC A. Sellmaier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17685-2025
143. Evaluation of Data Processing Strategies for Methane Isotopic Signatures Determined During Near-Source Measurements S. Defratyka et al. https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.1878