Articles | Volume 18, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-5357-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-5357-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description article
| 
24 Jul 2026
Data description article |
| 24 Jul 2026
| 24 Jul 2026
A database of objectively identified atmospheric rivers based on a multi-method fusion algorithm
Hongbin Chen
State Key Laboratory of Environment Characteristics and Effects for Near-space, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
State Key Laboratory of Environment Characteristics and Effects for Near-space, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
Seok-Woo Son
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Bin Guan
Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Mengxin Pan
Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University 8888 University Drive Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
Related authors
No articles found.
Aleena M. Jaison, Lesley J. Gray, Scott M. Osprey, James A. Anstey, Martin B. Andrews, Neal Butchart, Zhaoyang Chai, Dong-Chan Hong, Kai Huang, Yoshio Kawatani, Jeff R. Knight, Pu Lin, Francois Lott, Yixiong Lu, Hiroaki Naoe, Jadwiga H. Richter, Nan Rosenbloom, Federico Serva, Anne K. Smith, Seok-Woo Son, Qi Tang, Shingo Watanabe, Jinbo Xie, and Kohei Yoshida
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4135, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4135, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Short summary
The tropical upper stratosphere has winds that switch between westerly and easterly every six months known as the semi-annual oscillation (SAO). Climate models commonly show an easterly bias in the SAO. We analysed data from many models to test if correcting the biases in winds lower in the stratosphere could improve SAO. We find correcting the lower-level wind biases reduces the SAO easterly bias, though further improvements, such as better representation of atmospheric waves, are still needed.
Kai Huang, Chang-Hyun Park, Seung-Yoon Back, Jorge L. García-Franco, Hera Kim, Pu Lin, Scott Osprey, Jadwiga Richter, Chih-Chieh Chen, Seok-Woo Son, Shigeo Yoden, Yuna Lim, Neal Butchart, James Anstey, Yoshio Kawatani, Martin B. Andrews, Francois Lott, Yixiong Lu, Zhaoyang Chai, Nan Rosenbloom, Qi Tang, Jinbo Xie, Federico Serva, Dong-Chan Hong, Shingo Watanabe, Aleena M. Jaison, Hiroaki Naoe, and Kohei Yoshida
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3744, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-3744, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Short summary
The tropical atmosphere has large-scale wind and rainfall patterns shaping weather worldwide. Winds high above the tropics are thought to influence a major tropical rainfall system, but climate models fail to reproduce this link. We tested 12 climate models after constraining their high-altitude winds to match observations. Although the winds then matched, the models failed to capture the tropical response, as they did not realistically simulate it. Improving this is key to better prediction.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, David Avisar, Scott M. Osprey, Doug Smith, Jian Rao, and Jonathon S. Wright
Weather Clim. Dynam., 7, 1133–1152, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-1133-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-1133-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The Quasi-biennial Oscillation (QBO) dominates variability in the tropical stratosphere, & it impacts surface climate in several parts of the world. However, climate models have been shown to systematically under-estimate the influence of the QBO. Here, we re-evaluate this finding using much larger ensemble sizes than have been previously available based on four separate models. We find that the models are comparatively more successful in capturing QBO influences than reported by previous work.
Hyun-Kyu Lee, James A. Anstey, Hye-Yeong Chun, Shingo Watanabe, Francois Lott, Zhaoyang Chai, Yixiong Lu, Qi Tang, Jinbo Xie, Dong-Chan Hong, Seok-Woo Son, Federico Serva, Pu Lin, Martin B. Andrews, Neal Butchart, Aleena M. Jaison, Jeff R. Knight, Scott Osprey, Hiroaki Naoe, Kohei Yoshida, Yoshio Kawatani, and Jadwiga H. Richter
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2856, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2856, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Weather and Climate Dynamics (WCD).
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates the systematic biases in equatorial wave forcing of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) by comparing internally generated and bias-corrected experiments using a multi-model ensemble. Although nudging effectively mitigates QBO biases, systematic biases in wave forcing are not fully resolved. The equatorial wave forcing in the lower stratosphere remains weaker than that in reanalyses, while an eastward wave forcing bias is observed in the mid-to-upper stratosphere.
Dong-Chan Hong, Seok-Woo Son, Blanca Ayarzagüena, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Peter Hitchcock, Yu-Kyung Hyun, and Jiankai Zhang
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2798, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-2798, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
This study investigates how Sudden Stratospheric Warming (SSW) influences surface climate. By comparing multi-model simulations, we isolated and quantified the role of SSWs. Results reveal that poleward mass transport during SSWs induces high pressure over the Arctic, driving changes in extratropical circulations. While SSWs alter the troposphere, chaotic internal weather variability can amplify or suppress their influence, explaining the differing surface impacts following SSWs.
James A. Anstey, Neal Butchart, Scott Osprey, Yoshio Kawatani, Kevin Hamilton, Jadwiga H. Richter, Tim Stockdale, Martin B. Andrews, Zhaoyang Chai, Paolo Davini, Dong-Chan Hong, Kai Huang, Aleena M. Jaison, Tobias Kerzenmacher, Jeff R. Knight, Pu Lin, Francois Lott, Yixiong Lu, Hiroaki Naoe, Federico Serva, Isla Simpson, Seok-Woo Son, Qi Tang, Shingo Watanabe, Jinbo Xie, and Kohei Yoshida
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1165, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1165, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We describe experiments where modelled tropical stratosphere winds are adjusted by "nudging" them toward realistic time-evolving eastward and westward Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) winds. The effects of this bias correction on other atmospheric processes, such as the stratospheric polar vortex or tropical waves that force the QBO, can then be assessed. We describe details of the experiments, the multi-model ensemble that has performed them, and basic validation of the nudging response.
Qian Lu, Jian Rao, Chunhua Shi, and Chaim I. Garfinkel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 5763–5780, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5763-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5763-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Stratospheric water vapor has an impact on global temperature changes. Tropical stratospheric water vapor exhibits a clear imprint of the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO). This study compares the water vapor variations associated with the QBO between boreal winter and summer, and the seasonal difference in the stratospheric water vapor distribution under different QBO phases is revealed.
Rongzhao Lu and Jian Rao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 3723–3742, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3723-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-3723-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The downward impact of sudden stratospheric warming events (SSWs) on the troposphere is still controversial. We further classify downward-propagating SSWs (DWs) into three types that are followed by cold surges over Eurasia (EA), over North America (NA), and over both (BOTH), respectively. This study reveals the diversity of the DWs and distinguishes their potential impact on both continents in the Northern Hemisphere.
Blanca Ayarzagüena, Amy H. Butler, Peter Hitchcock, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zac D. Lawrence, Wuhan Ning, Philip Rupp, Zheng Wu, Hilla Afargan-Gerstman, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Martin Jucker, Gerbrand Koren, Daniel De Maeseneire, Gloria L. Manney, Marisol Osman, Masakazu Taguchi, Cory Barton, Dong-Chan Hong, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Hera Kim, Jeff Knight, Piero Malguzzi, Daniele Mastrangelo, Jiyoung Oh, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Isla R. Simpson, Seok-Woo Son, Damien Specq, and Tim Stockdale
Weather Clim. Dynam., 7, 411–437, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-411-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-411-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Sudden Stratospheric Warmings (SSWs) are known to follow a sustained wave dissipation in the stratosphere, which depends on both the tropospheric and stratospheric states. However, the relative role of each state is still unclear. Using a new set of subseasonal to seasonal forecasts, we show that the stratospheric state does not drastically affect the precursors of three recent SSWs, but modulates the stratospheric wave activity, with impacts depending on SSW features.
Martin B. Andrews, Neal Butchart, James A. Anstey, Ewa Bednarz, Dillon Elsbury, Jorge L. García-Franco, Vinay Kumar, Froila M. Palmeiro, Natasha E. Trencham, Kohei Yoshida, Zhaoyang Chai, Dong-Chan Hong, Kai Huang, Aleena M. Jaison, Yoshio Kawatani, Jeff R. Knight, Pu Lin, François Lott, Yixiong Lu, Hiroaki Naoe, Scott M. Osprey, Jadwiga H. Richter, Federico Serva, Seok-Woo Son, Qi Tang, Shingo Watanabe, and Jinbo Xie
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-737, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-737, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
The observed winds in the upper atmosphere over the equator have alternating easterly and westerly regions that descend towards the lower atmosphere before dissipating, with a period of approximately 28 months. This is known as the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO). The QBO is known to influence remote regions of the atmosphere. This paper details the results of multi-model experiments where the QBO is nudged towards the observed QBO allowing the assessment of these remote connections.
William J. M. Seviour, Justin Finkel, Philip Rupp, Regan Mudhar, Amy H. Butler, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Peter Hitchcock, Blanca Ayarzagüena, Dong-Chan Hong, Yu-Kyung Hyun, Hera Kim, Eun-Pa Lim, Daniel De Maeseneire, Gabriele Messori, Gerbrand Koren, Michael Sigmond, Isla R. Simpson, and Seok-Woo Son
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-230, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-230, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Variability of the stratospheric polar vortex is thought to play a role in driving weather extremes, but quantifying this role for a given event has proved challenging. Using a new set of perturbed subseasonal forecast experiments from 7 modelling centres we determine the stratospheric contribution to the risk and severity of three recent extreme weather events. The forecast-based methodology that we develop is applicable to understanding a range of other drivers of weather extremes.
Dillon Elsbury, Federico Serva, Julie M. Caron, Seung-Yoon Back, Clara Orbe, Jadwiga H. Richter, James A. Anstey, Neal Butchart, Chih-Chieh Chen, Javier García-Serrano, Anne Glanville, Yoshio Kawatani, Tobias Kerzenmacher, Francois Lott, Hiroaki Naoe, Scott Osprey, Froila M. Palmeiro, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Stefan Versick, Shingo Watanabe, and Kohei Yoshida
Weather Clim. Dynam., 7, 317–339, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-317-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-317-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We used climate models to test how constant El Niño and La Niña ocean conditions shape the Madden-Julian Oscillation during northern winter. El Niño made this weather pattern move faster, while La Niña slowed it down. The Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, a repeating wind pattern high in the atmosphere, had little effect. This shows that long-lasting ocean conditions mainly drive the changes we found.
Wuhan Ning, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Judah Cohen, Ian P. White, and Jian Rao
Weather Clim. Dynam., 7, 277–295, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-277-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-7-277-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Whether the zonal structure of a polar vortex matters for surface climate is an open question, with much observational work showing a role but with limited modeling work and demonstration of a causal influence. Here, we isolate this influence using a moist general circulation model. We find that the surface responses differ qualitatively depending on the zonal asymmetries of the shifted polar vortex and concurrently occurring wave reflection events, and provide a mechanistic explanation for why.
Hiroaki Naoe, Jorge L. García-Franco, Chang-Hyun Park, Mario Rodrigo, Froila M. Palmeiro, Federico Serva, Masakazu Taguchi, Kohei Yoshida, James A. Anstey, Javier García-Serrano, Seok-Woo Son, Yoshio Kawatani, Neal Butchart, Kevin Hamilton, Chih-Chieh Chen, Anne Glanville, Tobias Kerzenmacher, François Lott, Clara Orbe, Scott Osprey, Mijeong Park, Jadwiga H. Richter, Stefan Versick, and Shingo Watanabe
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 1419–1442, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-1419-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-1419-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Links between the stratospheric Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) and atmospheric circulations in the tropics, subtropics, and polar regions, as well as their modulation by the El Nino–Southern Oscillation, are examined through model experiments. The QBO–polar vortex connection is reproduced by a multi-model ensemble at about half the observed amplitude. Weak performance of QBO signals in these regions is likely due to unrealistically weak QBO amplitudes in the lower stratosphere.
Chaim I. Garfinkel, Zachary D. Lawrence, Amy H. Butler, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Irene Erner, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Gerbrand Koren, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Judah Cohen, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Javier García-Serrano, Neil P. Hindley, Martin Jucker, Hera Kim, Robert W. Lee, Simon H. Lee, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Inna Polichtchouk, Jian Rao, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 6, 171–195, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-6-171-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Variability in the extratropical stratosphere and troposphere is coupled, and because of the longer timescales characteristic of the stratosphere, this allows for a window of opportunity for surface prediction. This paper assesses whether models used for operational prediction capture these coupling processes accurately. We find that most processes are too weak; however downward coupling from the lower stratosphere to the near surface is too strong.
Rongzhao Lu and Jian Rao
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2179, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-2179, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
The SSWs are classified into downward-propagating (DW) SSWs with noticeable impacts on the troposphere and non-downward-propagating (NDW). The DW events are further classified into three types. This study improves our understanding of the diversity of the SSWs.
Zefan Ju, Jian Rao, Yue Wang, Junfeng Yang, and Qian Lu
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14903–14918, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14903-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14903-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
In the paper, we explored the impact of the Madden–Julian Oscillation (MJO) and the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) on East China summer rainfall variability. It is novel to find that the combined impact of MJO and QBO is not maximized when the QBO and MJO are in phase to enhance (or suppress) the tropical convection.
Qian Lu, Jian Rao, Chunhua Shi, Dong Guo, Guiqin Fu, Ji Wang, and Zhuoqi Liang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13087–13102, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13087-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13087-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Existing evidence mainly focuses on the possible impact of tropospheric climate anomalies on the regional air pollutions, but few studies pay attention to the impact of stratospheric changes on haze pollutions in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH) region. Our study reveals the linkage between the stratospheric variability and the regional atmospheric environment. The downward-propagating stratospheric signals might have a cleaning effect on the atmospheric environment in the BTH region.
Zachary D. Lawrence, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Amy H. Butler, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Javier García-Serrano, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Neil P. Hindley, Liwei Jia, Martin Jucker, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Hera Kim, Andrea L. Lang, Simon H. Lee, Pu Lin, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Judith Perlwitz, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Irene Erner, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 977–1001, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Forecast models that are used to predict weather often struggle to represent the Earth’s stratosphere. This may impact their ability to predict surface weather weeks in advance, on subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) timescales. We use data from many S2S forecast systems to characterize and compare the stratospheric biases present in such forecast models. These models have many similar stratospheric biases, but they tend to be worse in systems with low model tops located within the stratosphere.
Seungmok Paik, Seung-Ki Min, Seok-Woo Son, Soon-Il An, Jong-Seong Kug, and Sang-Wook Yeh
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-187, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-187, 2022
Revised manuscript not accepted
Short summary
Short summary
This paper investigates Earth’s surface climate response to volcanic eruptions at different latitudes. By analyzing last millennium ensemble simulations of a coupled climate model, we have identified physical processes associated with the diverse impacts of volcanic eruption latitudes, focusing on the tropical ocean surface warming and the stratospheric polar vortex intensification. Our results provide important global implications for atmospheric responses to future volcanic aerosols.
Adam A. Scaife, Mark P. Baldwin, Amy H. Butler, Andrew J. Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Steven C. Hardiman, Peter Haynes, Alexey Yu Karpechko, Eun-Pa Lim, Shunsuke Noguchi, Judith Perlwitz, Lorenzo Polvani, Jadwiga H. Richter, John Scinocca, Michael Sigmond, Theodore G. Shepherd, Seok-Woo Son, and David W. J. Thompson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2601–2623, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Great progress has been made in computer modelling and simulation of the whole climate system, including the stratosphere. Since the late 20th century we also gained a much clearer understanding of how the stratosphere interacts with the lower atmosphere. The latest generation of numerical prediction systems now explicitly represents the stratosphere and its interaction with surface climate, and here we review its role in long-range predictions and projections from weeks to decades ahead.
Cited articles
Bengtsson, L., Hodges, K. I., and Roeckner, E.: Storm tracks and climate change, J. Climate, 19, 3518–3543, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3815.1, 2006.
Brands, S., Gutiérrez, J. M., and San-Martín, D.: Twentieth-century atmospheric river activity along the west coasts of Europe and North America: Algorithm formulation, reanalysis uncertainty and links to atmospheric circulation patterns, Clim. Dynam., 48, 2771–2795, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3095-6, 2017.
Chen, H.-B. and Rao, J.: A database of objectively identified atmospheric rivers based on a multi-method fusion algorithm, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18051602, 2025.
Chen, X., Leung, L. R., Gao, Y., Liu, Y., Wigmosta, M., and Richmond, M.: Predictability of extreme precipitation in western U.S. watersheds based on atmospheric river occurrence, intensity, and duration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11693–11701, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079831, 2018.
Cheng, T. F., Lu, M., Wang, B., and Dai, L.: A fresh view of the Asian-Australian monsoon complexity: The intertropical convective cell (ITCC) framework, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD039498, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039498, 2024.
Corringham, T. W., McCarthy, J., Shulgina, T., Gershunov, A., Cayan, D. R., and Ralph, F. M.: Climate change contributions to future atmospheric river flood damages in the western United States, Sci. Rep., 12, 13747, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15474-2, 2022.
Dettinger, M. D.: Atmospheric rivers as drought busters on the U.S. West Coast, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 1721–1732, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-02.1, 2013.
Ding, Y., Liang, P., Liu, Y., and Zhang, Y.: Multiscale variability of Meiyu and its prediction: A new review, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031496, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031496, 2020.
Eiras-Barca, J., Ramos, A. M., Pinto, J. G., Trigo, R. M., Liberato, M. L. R., and Miguez-Macho, G.: The concurrence of atmospheric rivers and explosive cyclogenesis in the North Atlantic and North Pacific basins, Earth Syst. Dynam., 9, 91–102, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-9-91-2018, 2018.
Francis, D., Mattingly, K. S., Temimi, M., Massom, R., and Heil, P.: On the crucial role of atmospheric rivers in the two major Weddell Polynya events in 1973 and 2017 in Antarctica, Sci. Adv., 6, eabc2695, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc2695, 2020.
Gimeno, L., Algarra, I., Eiras-Barca, J., Ramos, A. M., and Nieto, R.: Atmospheric river, a term encompassing different meteorological patterns, WIREs Water, 8, e1558, https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1558, 2021.
Guan, B.: Global Atmospheric Rivers Database, Version 4, UCLA Dataverse [data set], https://doi.org/10.25346/S6/ZSW7UN, 2024.
Guan, B. and Waliser, D. E.: Detection of atmospheric rivers: Evaluation and application of an algorithm for global studies, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 12514–12535, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024257, 2015.
Guan, B. and Waliser, D. E.: Tracking atmospheric rivers globally: Spatial distributions and temporal evolution of life cycle characteristics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 12523–12552, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031205, 2019.
Guan, B. and Waliser, D. E.: A regionally refined quarter-degree global atmospheric rivers database based on ERA5, Sci. Data, 11, 440, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03258-4, 2024.
Guan, B., Molotch, N. P., Waliser, D. E., Fetzer, E. J., and Neiman, P. J.: Extreme snowfall events linked to atmospheric rivers and surface air temperature via satellite measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044696, 2010.
Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., and Ralph, F. M.: An intercomparison between reanalysis and dropsonde observations of the total water vapor transport in individual atmospheric rivers, J. Hydrometeorol., 19, 321–337, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0114.1, 2018.
Guo, Y., Shinoda, T., Guan, B., Waliser, D. E., and Chang, E. K. M.: Statistical relationship between atmospheric rivers and extratropical cyclones and anticyclones, J. Climate, 33, 7817–7834, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-19-0126.1, 2020.
Kamae, Y., Mei, W., Xie, S.-P., Naoi, M., and Ueda, H.: Atmospheric rivers over the northwestern Pacific: Climatology and interannual variability, J. Climate, 30, 5605–5619, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0875.1, 2017.
Kemter, M., Fischer, M., Luna, L. V., Schönfeldt, E., Vogel, J., Banerjee, A., Korup, O., and Thonicke, K.: Cascading hazards in the aftermath of Australia's 2019/2020 Black Summer wildfires, Earths Future, 9, e2020EF001884, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001884, 2021.
Knippertz, P. and Wernli, H.: A Lagrangian climatology of tropical moisture exports to the Northern Hemispheric extratropics, J. Climate, 23, 987–1003, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3333.1, 2010.
Kwon, Y. and Son, S.-W.: East Asian atmospheric rivers are most hazardous in summer, Weather Clim. Extrem., 44, 100658, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2024.100658, 2024.
Kwon, Y., Park, C., Son, S.-W., and Kim, J.: Modulation of East Asian atmospheric rivers by the Pacific-Japan teleconnection pattern, Environ. Res. Lett., 19, 064055, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad4fa6, 2024.
Lavers, D. A. and Villarini, G.: The contribution of atmospheric rivers to precipitation in Europe and the United States, J. Hydrol., 522, 382–390, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.010, 2015.
Lavers, D. A., Allan, R. P., Wood, E. F., Villarini, G., Brayshaw, D. J., and Wade, A. J.: Winter floods in Britain are connected to atmospheric rivers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049783, 2011.
Lavers, D. A., Villarini, G., Allan, R. P., Wood, E. F., and Wade, A. J.: The detection of atmospheric rivers in atmospheric reanalyses and their links to British winter floods and the large-scale climatic circulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018027, 2012.
Liang, J. and Yong, Y.: Climatology of atmospheric rivers in the Asian monsoon region, Int. J. Climatol., 41, E801–E818, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6729, 2021.
Liang, J., Yong, Y., and Hawcroft, M. K.: Long-term trends in atmospheric rivers over East Asia, Clim. Dynam., 60, 643–666, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06339-5, 2023.
Lim, E.-P., Hendon, H. H., Boschat, G., Hudson, D., Thompson, D. W. J., Dowdy, A. J., and Arblaster, J. M.: Australian hot and dry extremes induced by weakenings of the stratospheric polar vortex, Nat. Geosci., 12, 896–901, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0456-x, 2019.
Mahoney, K., Jackson, D. L., Neiman, P., Abel, M. R., Darby, L., Wick, G., White, A., Sukovich, E., and Cifelli, R.: Understanding the role of atmospheric rivers in heavy precipitation in the southeast United States, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 1617–1632, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0279.1, 2016.
Nayak, M. A., Villarini, G., and Lavers, D. A.: On the skill of numerical weather prediction models to forecast atmospheric rivers over the central United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 4354–4362, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL060299, 2014.
Neiman, P. J., Ralph, F. M., White, A. B., Kingsmill, D. E., and Persson, P. O. G.: The statistical relationship between upslope flow and rainfall in California's coastal mountains: Observations during CALJET, Mon. Weather Rev., 130, 1468–1492, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2002)130<1468:TSRBUF>2.0.CO;2, 2002.
Neiman, P. J., Ralph, F. M., Wick, G. A., Lundquist, J. D., and Dettinger, M. D.: Meteorological characteristics and overland precipitation impacts of atmospheric rivers affecting the West Coast of North America based on eight years of SSM/I satellite observations, J. Hydrometeorol., 9, 22–47, https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JHM855.1, 2008.
Neiman, P. J., Schick, L. J., Ralph, F. M., Abel, M. R., and Wick, G. A.: Flooding in western Washington: The connection to atmospheric rivers, J. Hydrometeorol., 12, 1337–1358, https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JHM1358.1, 2011.
Paltan, H., Waliser, D., Lim, W. H., Guan, B., Yamazaki, D., Pant, R., and Dadson, S.: Global floods and water availability driven by atmospheric rivers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 10387-10395, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074882, 2017.
Pan, M. and Lu, M.: A novel atmospheric river identification algorithm, Water Resour. Res., 55, 6069–6087, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR024407, 2019.
Pan, M. and Lu, M.: East Asia atmospheric river catalog: Annual cycle, transition mechanism, and precipitation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL089477, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL089477, 2020.
Park, C. and Son, S.-W.: Atmospheric rivers in East Asia summer as the continuum of extratropical and monsoonal moisture plumes, J. Climate, 37, 5055–5071, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-23-0731.1, 2024.
Park, C., Son, S.-W., and Kim, H.: Distinct features of atmospheric rivers in the early versus late East Asian summer monsoon and their impacts on monsoon rainfall, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033537, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033537, 2021.
Park, C., Son, S.-W., and Guan, B.: Multiscale nature of atmospheric rivers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL102784, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL102784, 2023.
Payne, A. E., Demory, M.-E., Leung, L. R., Ramos, A. M., Shields, C. A., Rutz, J. J., Siler, N., Villarini, G., Hall, A., and Ralph, F. M.: Responses and impacts of atmospheric rivers to climate change, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 1, 143–157, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0030-5, 2020.
Priestley, M. D. K. and Catto, J. L.: Future changes in the extratropical storm tracks and cyclone intensity, wind speed, and structure, Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 337–360, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-337-2022, 2022.
Ralph, F. M. and Dettinger, M. D.: Storms, floods, and the science of atmospheric rivers, Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 92, 265–266, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011EO320001, 2011.
Ralph, F. M., Neiman, P. J., and Wick, G. A.: Satellite and CALJET aircraft observations of atmospheric rivers over the eastern North Pacific Ocean during the winter of 1997/98, Mon. Weather Rev., 132, 1721–1745, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132%3C1721:SACAOO%3E2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Ralph, F. M., Neiman, P. J., Wick, G. A., Gutman, S. I., Dettinger, M. D., Cayan, D. R., and White, A. B.: Flooding on California's Russian River: Role of atmospheric rivers, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026689, 2006.
Ralph, F. M., Coleman, T., Neiman, P. J., Zamora, R. J., and Dettinger, M. D.: Observed impacts of duration and seasonality of atmospheric-river landfalls on soil moisture and runoff in coastal northern California, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 443–459, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-076.1, 2013.
Ralph, F. M., Dettinger, M., Lavers, D., Gorodetskaya, I. V., Martin, A., Viale, M., White, A. B., Oakley, N., Rutz, J., Spackman, J. R., Wernli, H., and Cordeira, J.: Atmospheric rivers emerge as a global science and applications focus, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1969–1973, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0262.1, 2017a.
Ralph, F. M., Iacobellis, S. F., Neiman, P. J., Cordeira, J. M., Spackman, J. R., Waliser, D. E., Wick, G. A., White, A. B., and Fairall, C.: Dropsonde observations of total integrated water vapor transport within North Pacific atmospheric rivers, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 2577–2596, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0036.1, 2017b.
Ralph, F. M., Dettinger, M. D., Cairns, M. M., Galarneau, T. J., and Eylander, J.: Defining “atmospheric river”: How the Glossary of Meteorology helped resolve a debate, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, 837–839, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0157.1, 2018.
Rao, J., Garfinkel, C. I., White, I. P., and Schwartz, C.: The Southern Hemisphere minor sudden stratospheric warming in September 2019 and its predictions in S2S models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032723, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032723, 2020.
Reid, K. J., King, A. D., Lane, T. P., and Short, E.: The sensitivity of atmospheric river identification to integrated water vapor transport threshold, resolution, and regridding method, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032897, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032897, 2020.
Risbey, J. S., Pook, M. J., McIntosh, P. C., Wheeler, M. C., and Hendon, H. H.: On the remote drivers of rainfall variability in Australia, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 3233–3253, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009MWR2861.1, 2009.
Rutz, J. J., Steenburgh, W. J., and Ralph, F. M.: Climatological characteristics of atmospheric rivers and their inland penetration over the western United States, Mon. Weather Rev., 142, 905–921, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-13-00168.1, 2014.
Rutz, J. J., Shields, C. A., Lora, J. M., Payne, A. E., Guan, B., Ullrich, P., O'Brien, T., Leung, L. R., Ralph, F. M., Wehner, M., Brands, S., Collow, A., Goldenson, N., Gorodetskaya, I., Griffith, H., Kashinath, K., Kawzenuk, B., Krishnan, H., Kurlin, V., Lavers, D., Magnusdottir, G., Mahoney, K., McClenny, E., Muszynski, G., Nguyen, P. D., Prabhat, Mr., Qian, Y., Ramos, A. M., Sarangi, C., Sellars, S., Shulgina, T., Tome, R., Waliser, D., Walton, D., Wick, G., Wilson, A. M., and Viale, M.: The Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project (ARTMIP): Quantifying uncertainties in atmospheric river climatology, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 13777–13802, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030936, 2019.
Sayama, T., Yamada, M., Sugawara, Y., and Yamazaki, D.: Ensemble flash flood predictions using a high-resolution nationwide distributed rainfall-runoff model: Case study of the heavy rain event of July 2018 and Typhoon Hagibis in 2019, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 7, 75, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-020-00391-7, 2020.
Shields, C. A., Rutz, J. J., Leung, L.-Y., Ralph, F. M., Wehner, M., Kawzenuk, B., Lora, J. M., McClenny, E., Osborne, T., Payne, A. E., Ullrich, P., Gershunov, A., Goldenson, N., Guan, B., Qian, Y., Ramos, A. M., Sarangi, C., Sellars, S., Gorodetskaya, I., Kashinath, K., Kurlin, V., Mahoney, K., Muszynski, G., Pierce, R., Subramanian, A. C., Tome, R., Waliser, D., Walton, D., Wick, G., Wilson, A., Lavers, D., Prabhat, Collow, A., Krishnan, H., Magnusdottir, G., and Nguyen, P.: Atmospheric River Tracking Method Intercomparison Project (ARTMIP): project goals and experimental design, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2455–2474, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2455-2018, 2018.
Tsuguti, H., Seino, N., Kawase, H., Imada, Y., Nakaegawa, T., and Takayabu, I.: Meteorological overview and mesoscale characteristics of the Heavy Rain Event of July 2018 in Japan, Landslides, 16, 363–371, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-018-1098-6, 2019.
Wang, H.-R.: Atmospheric river (AR) fused identification dataset from 1980 to 2016, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10229029, 2023.
Wang, H.-R., Li, F.-F., Grigorev, G. V., Yao, Z.-Y., Ge, D., Wang, G.-Q., and Qiu, J.: Occurrence frequency of global atmospheric river (AR) events: A data fusion analysis of 12 identification data sets, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD039730, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039730, 2024.
Wang, T., Wei, K., and Ma, J.: Atmospheric rivers and Mei-yu rainfall in China: A case study of summer 2020, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 38, 2137–2152, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1096-9, 2021.
Wick, G. A., Neiman, P. J., and Ralph, F. M.: Description and validation of an automated objective technique for identification and characterization of the integrated water vapor signature of atmospheric rivers, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 51, 2166–2176, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2211024, 2013.
Yang, Y., Zhao, T., Ni, G., and Sun, T.: Atmospheric rivers over the Bay of Bengal lead to northern Indian extreme rainfall, Int. J. Climatol., 38, 1010–1021, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5229, 2018.
Ye, C., Zhang, H., Moise, A., and Mo, R.: Atmospheric rivers in the Australia-Asian region: A BoM–CMA collaborative study, J. South. Hemisph. Earth Syst. Sci., 70, 3–16, https://doi.org/10.1071/ES19025, 2020.
Zhang, Z., Ralph, F. M., and Zheng, M.: The relationship between extratropical cyclone strength and atmospheric river intensity and position, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 1814–1823, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079071, 2019.
Zhou, Y., Kim, H., and Guan, B.: Life cycle of atmospheric rivers: Identification and climatological characteristics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 12,715–12,725, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029180, 2018.
Zhu, Y. and Newell, R. E.: Atmospheric rivers and bombs, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 1999–2002, https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL01710, 1994.
Zhu, Y. and Newell, R. E.: A proposed algorithm for moisture fluxes from atmospheric rivers, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 725–735, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0725:APAFMF>2.0.CO;2, 1998.
Short summary
We present a global atmospheric river (AR) database derived from ERA5 reanalysis (1940–2024). By employing a novel multi-method fusion algorithm, this database provides AR identification results at a horizontal resolution of 1° × 1° and a temporal resolution of 6 hours. Characterized by enhanced algorithmic robustness and extensive temporal coverage, it offers a valuable resource for further weather and climate research.
We present a global atmospheric river (AR) database derived from ERA5 reanalysis (1940–2024). By...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint