This study established and evaluated a quality-assured and relatively long-term dataset (2013-2022) comprising nine radiation components observed at the Shangdianzi regional Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) station. This dataset serves as a crucial foundation for investigating solar radiation variations, validating satellite products, and model simulations, among other applications. The manuscript detailly outlines the quality control procedures, assesses data integrity, and provides explanations for data gaps. Additionally, a concise analysis of diurnal variations is included, demonstrating clear logic and well-organized content. While this study is of utmost significance, a few minor concerns should be addressed, as detailed below:

• Although the quality control procedures have encompassed essential tests, such as the physically possible limits test, extremely rare limits test, and comparison test between radiation components, it is worth considering additional challenges encountered when measuring solar radiation, such as addressing zero offsets in pyranometers and conducting tracker-off tests. Providing insights into how these issues were addressed would enhance the paper's completeness.

• Regarding the calculation of monthly average solar radiation from daily values, two specific aspects require clarification: (1) handling data gaps in the daily time series and (2) establishing a threshold for the ratio of daily observations to account for days in a month. Elaborating on these aspects, including strategies for addressing data gaps and specifying the threshold criteria, would improve transparency.

• The omission of annual average solar radiation and an in-depth analysis of changes from 2013 to 2022 is a notable gap. To enhance the study, it is recommended to extend the analysis by incorporating interannual variation and trend analysis. This addition would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the dataset's temporal dynamics.

Please consider addressing the above-mentioned points to further refine the manuscript.

This manuscript reported 10 years of measurement of nine radiation components at the Shangdianzi station in China. The important details regarding measurement and quality control are well explained, making this dataset of great value to the community. The manuscript is well written and potential application of the dataset is discussed. I recommend publication of this work and I only have minor comments.

Section 3.2. The instruments for several radiation components have changed over the years, such as for Inb, Id. Were any cross-validation or instrument performance comparisons done for these instruments? Instruments with the same model and manufacturer can sometimes behave differently, so it is important to make the comparison.

Section 3.2.2. What is the frequency of instrument maintenance and calibration? I only see each instrument being calibrated once at the manufacturer and then they are used for several years. Is this frequency sufficient for high-quality measurement?