Articles | Volume 16, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-715-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-715-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description paper
| 
31 Jan 2024
Data description paper |
| 31 Jan 2024
| 31 Jan 2024
Reference maps of soil phosphorus for the pan-Amazon region
João Paulo Darela-Filho
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Rio Claro, 13506-900, Brazil
Earth System Science Laboratory (LabTerra), University of Campinas (Unicamp) Center for Meteorological and Climatic Research Applied to Agriculture (CEPAGRI), Campinas – SP, 13083-886, Brazil
School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85354 Freising, Germany
Anja Rammig
School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85354 Freising, Germany
Katrin Fleischer
School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85354 Freising, Germany
Department of Biogeochemical Signals, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, 07745 Jena, Germany
Tatiana Reichert
School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85354 Freising, Germany
Laynara Figueiredo Lugli
School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich (TUM), 85354 Freising, Germany
Carlos Alberto Quesada
Coordination of Environmental Dynamics (CODAM), National Institute for Amazonian Research – INPA, Avenida André Araújo, 2236, Manaus, Amazonas, 69060-001, Brazil
Luis Carlos Colocho Hurtarte
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Beamline ID21, Grenoble 38100, France
Diamond Light Source Ltd., Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, UK
Mateus Dantas de Paula
Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (SBiK-F), 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
David M. Lapola
Earth System Science Laboratory (LabTerra), University of Campinas (Unicamp) Center for Meteorological and Climatic Research Applied to Agriculture (CEPAGRI), Campinas – SP, 13083-886, Brazil
Related authors
Benjamin F. Meyer, João P. Darela-Filho, Konstantin Gregor, Allan Buras, Qiao-Lin Gu, Andreas Krause, Daijun Liu, Phillip Papastefanou, Sijeh Asuk, Thorsten E. E. Grams, Christian S. Zang, and Anja Rammig
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4643-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4643-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change has increased the likelihood of drought events across Europe, potentially threatening the European forest carbon sink. Dynamic vegetation models with mechanistic plant hydraulic architecture are needed to model these developments. We evaluate the plant hydraulic architecture version of LPJ-GUESS and show its ability to capture species-specific evapotranspiration responses to drought and to reproduce flux observations of both gross primary production and evapotranspiration.
Mateus Dantas de Paula, Tatiana Reichert, Laynara F. Lugli, Erica McGale, Kerstin Pierick, João Paulo Darela-Filho, Liam Langan, Jürgen Homeier, Anja Rammig, and Thomas Hickler
Biogeosciences, 22, 2707–2732, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2707-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2707-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores how plant roots with different forms and functions rely on fungal partnerships for nutrient uptake. This relationship was integrated into a vegetation model and was tested in a tropical forest in Ecuador. The model accurately predicted root traits and showed that without fungi, biomass decreased by up to 80 %. The findings highlight the critical role of fungi in ecosystem processes and suggest that root–fungal interactions should be considered in vegetation models.
Konstantin Gregor, Benjamin F. Meyer, Tillmann Gaida, Victor Justo Vasquez, Karina Bett-Williams, Matthew Forrest, João P. Darela-Filho, Sam Rabin, Marcos Longo, Joe R. Melton, Johan Nord, Peter Anthoni, Vladislav Bastrikov, Thomas Colligan, Christine Delire, Michael C. Dietze, George Hurtt, Akihiko Ito, Lasse T. Keetz, Jürgen Knauer, Johannes Köster, Tzu-Shun Lin, Lei Ma, Marie Minvielle, Stefan Olin, Sebastian Ostberg, Hao Shi, Reiner Schnur, Urs Schönenberger, Qing Sun, Peter E. Thornton, and Anja Rammig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1733, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1733, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientific models are crucial for understanding Earth’s processes. However, they sometimes do not adhere to highest software quality standards, and scientific results are often hard to reproduce due to the complexity of the workflows. Here we gather the expertise of 20 modeling groups and software engineers to define best practices for making geoscientific models maintainable, usable, and reproducible. We conclude with an open-source example serving as a reference for modeling communities.
Mateus Dantas de Paula, Matthew Forrest, David Warlind, João Paulo Darela Filho, Katrin Fleischer, Anja Rammig, and Thomas Hickler
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2249–2274, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study maps global nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability and how they changed from 1901 to 2018. We find that tropical regions are mostly P-limited, while temperate and boreal areas face N limitations. Over time, P limitation increased, especially in the tropics, while N limitation decreased. These shifts are key to understanding global plant growth and carbon storage, highlighting the importance of including P dynamics in ecosystem models.
Olivier Bouriaud, Ernst-Detlef Schulze, Konstantin Gregor, Issam Boukhris, Peter Högberg, Roland Irslinger, Phillip Papastefanou, Julia Pongratz, Anja Rammig, Riccardo Valentini, and Christian Körner
Biogeosciences, 22, 4729–4741, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4729-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4729-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of harvesting on forests' carbon sink capacities is debated. One view is that their sink strength is resilient to harvesting, and the other is that it disrupts these capacities. Our work shows that leaf area index (LAI) has been overlooked in this discussion. We found that temperate forests' carbon uptake is largely insensitive to variations in LAI beyond 4.5 m² m-² but that forests operate at higher levels.
Mariano A. B. da Rocha, Cléo Q. Dias-Júnior, Julia C. P. Cohen, Flávio A. F. D’Oliveira, Anne C. S. Mendonça, Christopher Pöhlker, Subha Raj, Alessandro C. de Araújo, Marco A. Franco, Paulo Artaxo, Carlos A. Quesada, and Rafael S. Palácios
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4278, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4278, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how airborne particles like smoke affect a pristine Amazon rainforest. Using long-term data, we found that high aerosol pollution reduces the heat and water vapor released by the forest, causing a cooling effect. Surprisingly, it also substantially boosts the forest's carbon dioxide absorption by scattering sunlight, which helps plants with photosynthesis. This shows that aerosols significantly alter the Amazon's microclimate and its crucial role in the global carbon and water cycles.
Benjamin F. Meyer, João P. Darela-Filho, Konstantin Gregor, Allan Buras, Qiao-Lin Gu, Andreas Krause, Daijun Liu, Phillip Papastefanou, Sijeh Asuk, Thorsten E. E. Grams, Christian S. Zang, and Anja Rammig
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4643–4666, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4643-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4643-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Climate change has increased the likelihood of drought events across Europe, potentially threatening the European forest carbon sink. Dynamic vegetation models with mechanistic plant hydraulic architecture are needed to model these developments. We evaluate the plant hydraulic architecture version of LPJ-GUESS and show its ability to capture species-specific evapotranspiration responses to drought and to reproduce flux observations of both gross primary production and evapotranspiration.
Lucia S. Layritz, Konstantin Gregor, Andreas Krause, Stefan Kruse, Benjamin F. Meyer, Thomas A. M. Pugh, and Anja Rammig
Biogeosciences, 22, 3635–3660, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3635-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-3635-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Disturbances, such as fire, can change which vegetation grows in a forest, affecting water and carbon flows and, thus, the climate. Disturbances are expected to increase with climate change, but it is uncertain by how much. Using a simulation model, we studied how future climate, disturbances, and their combined effect impact northern (high-latitude) forest ecosystems. Our findings highlight the importance of considering these factors and the need to better understand how disturbances will change in the future.
Helena Vallicrosa, Katrin Fleischer, Manuel Delgado-Baquerizo, Marcos Fernández-Martínez, Jakub Černý, Di Tian, Angeliki Kourmouli, Carolina Mayoral, Diego Grados, Mingzhen Lu, and César Terrer
Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 1183–1196, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1183-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-1183-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We used field empirical data worldwide to calculate plant nitrogen uptake (Nup) and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in woodlands and grasslands to determine their drivers which can be used as empirical validation for models. Even though some regions of the world have decreased their N deposition, N deposition is still the most important driver explaining plant nitrogen uptake, aside from climatic variables. NUE is mainly driven by soil factors.
Mateus Dantas de Paula, Tatiana Reichert, Laynara F. Lugli, Erica McGale, Kerstin Pierick, João Paulo Darela-Filho, Liam Langan, Jürgen Homeier, Anja Rammig, and Thomas Hickler
Biogeosciences, 22, 2707–2732, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2707-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2707-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study explores how plant roots with different forms and functions rely on fungal partnerships for nutrient uptake. This relationship was integrated into a vegetation model and was tested in a tropical forest in Ecuador. The model accurately predicted root traits and showed that without fungi, biomass decreased by up to 80 %. The findings highlight the critical role of fungi in ecosystem processes and suggest that root–fungal interactions should be considered in vegetation models.
Konstantin Gregor, Benjamin F. Meyer, Tillmann Gaida, Victor Justo Vasquez, Karina Bett-Williams, Matthew Forrest, João P. Darela-Filho, Sam Rabin, Marcos Longo, Joe R. Melton, Johan Nord, Peter Anthoni, Vladislav Bastrikov, Thomas Colligan, Christine Delire, Michael C. Dietze, George Hurtt, Akihiko Ito, Lasse T. Keetz, Jürgen Knauer, Johannes Köster, Tzu-Shun Lin, Lei Ma, Marie Minvielle, Stefan Olin, Sebastian Ostberg, Hao Shi, Reiner Schnur, Urs Schönenberger, Qing Sun, Peter E. Thornton, and Anja Rammig
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1733, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1733, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
Geoscientific models are crucial for understanding Earth’s processes. However, they sometimes do not adhere to highest software quality standards, and scientific results are often hard to reproduce due to the complexity of the workflows. Here we gather the expertise of 20 modeling groups and software engineers to define best practices for making geoscientific models maintainable, usable, and reproducible. We conclude with an open-source example serving as a reference for modeling communities.
Friedrich J. Bohn, Ana Bastos, Romina Martin, Anja Rammig, Niak Sian Koh, Giles B. Sioen, Bram Buscher, Louise Carver, Fabrice DeClerck, Moritz Drupp, Robert Fletcher, Matthew Forrest, Alexandros Gasparatos, Alex Godoy-Faúndez, Gregor Hagedorn, Martin C. Hänsel, Jessica Hetzer, Thomas Hickler, Cornelia B. Krug, Stasja Koot, Xiuzhen Li, Amy Luers, Shelby Matevich, H. Damon Matthews, Ina C. Meier, Mirco Migliavacca, Awaz Mohamed, Sungmin O, David Obura, Ben Orlove, Rene Orth, Laura Pereira, Markus Reichstein, Lerato Thakholi, Peter H. Verburg, and Yuki Yoshida
Biogeosciences, 22, 2425–2460, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2425-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-2425-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
An interdisciplinary collaboration of 36 international researchers from 35 institutions highlights recent findings in biosphere research. Within eight themes, they discuss issues arising from climate change and other anthropogenic stressors and highlight the co-benefits of nature-based solutions and ecosystem services. Based on an analysis of these eight topics, we have synthesized four overarching insights.
Mateus Dantas de Paula, Matthew Forrest, David Warlind, João Paulo Darela Filho, Katrin Fleischer, Anja Rammig, and Thomas Hickler
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 2249–2274, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-2249-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study maps global nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) availability and how they changed from 1901 to 2018. We find that tropical regions are mostly P-limited, while temperate and boreal areas face N limitations. Over time, P limitation increased, especially in the tropics, while N limitation decreased. These shifts are key to understanding global plant growth and carbon storage, highlighting the importance of including P dynamics in ecosystem models.
Carlos A. Sierra, Ingrid Chanca, Meinrat Andreae, Alessandro Carioca de Araújo, Hella van Asperen, Lars Borchardt, Santiago Botía, Luiz Antonio Candido, Caio S. C. Correa, Cléo Quaresma Dias-Junior, Markus Eritt, Annica Fröhlich, Luciana V. Gatti, Marcus Guderle, Samuel Hammer, Martin Heimann, Viviana Horna, Armin Jordan, Steffen Knabe, Richard Kneißl, Jost Valentin Lavric, Ingeborg Levin, Kita Macario, Juliana Menger, Heiko Moossen, Carlos Alberto Quesada, Michael Rothe, Christian Rödenbeck, Yago Santos, Axel Steinhof, Bruno Takeshi, Susan Trumbore, and Sönke Zaehle
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-151, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-151, 2025
Revised manuscript under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
We present here a unique dataset of atmospheric observations of greenhouse gases and isotopes that provide key information on land-atmosphere interactions for the Amazon forests of central Brazil. The data show a relatively large level of variability, but also important trends in greenhouse gases, and signals from fires as well as seasonal biological activity.
Ingrid Chanca, Ingeborg Levin, Susan Trumbore, Kita Macario, Jost Lavric, Carlos Alberto Quesada, Alessandro Carioca de Araújo, Cléo Quaresma Dias Júnior, Hella van Asperen, Samuel Hammer, and Carlos A. Sierra
Biogeosciences, 22, 455–472, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-455-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-455-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Assessing the net carbon (C) budget of the Amazon entails considering the magnitude and timing of C absorption and losses through respiration (transit time of C). Radiocarbon-based estimates of the transit time of C in the Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) suggest a change in the transit time from 6 ± 2 years and 18 ± 4 years within 2 years (October 2019 and December 2021, respectively). This variability indicates that only a fraction of newly fixed C can be stored for decades or longer.
Luiz A. T. Machado, Jürgen Kesselmeier, Santiago Botía, Hella van Asperen, Meinrat O. Andreae, Alessandro C. de Araújo, Paulo Artaxo, Achim Edtbauer, Rosaria R. Ferreira, Marco A. Franco, Hartwig Harder, Sam P. Jones, Cléo Q. Dias-Júnior, Guido G. Haytzmann, Carlos A. Quesada, Shujiro Komiya, Jost Lavric, Jos Lelieveld, Ingeborg Levin, Anke Nölscher, Eva Pfannerstill, Mira L. Pöhlker, Ulrich Pöschl, Akima Ringsdorf, Luciana Rizzo, Ana M. Yáñez-Serrano, Susan Trumbore, Wanda I. D. Valenti, Jordi Vila-Guerau de Arellano, David Walter, Jonathan Williams, Stefan Wolff, and Christopher Pöhlker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 8893–8910, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8893-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8893-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Composite analysis of gas concentration before and after rainfall, during the day and night, gives insight into the complex relationship between trace gas variability and precipitation. The analysis helps us to understand the sources and sinks of trace gases within a forest ecosystem. It elucidates processes that are not discernible under undisturbed conditions and contributes to a deeper understanding of the trace gas life cycle and its intricate interactions with cloud dynamics in the Amazon.
Laura M. Pereira, Ignacio Gianelli, Therezah Achieng, Diva Amon, Sally Archibald, Suchinta Arif, Azucena Castro, Tapiwa Prosper Chimbadzwa, Kaera Coetzer, Tracy-Lynn Field, Odirilwe Selomane, Nadia Sitas, Nicola Stevens, Sebastian Villasante, Mohammed Armani, Duncan M. Kimuyu, Ibukun J. Adewumi, David M. Lapola, David Obura, Patricia Pinho, Felipe Roa-Clavijo, Juan Rocha, and U. Rashid Sumaila
Earth Syst. Dynam., 15, 341–366, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-341-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-341-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Narratives around tipping points, such as the need for
positivetipping points in energy transitions to avoid
negativeEarth system tipping points, do not take into account the entire spectrum of impacts the proposed interventions could have or still rely on narratives that maintain current unsustainable behaviours and marginalize many people. We unpack these ideas in the context of what they mean for the concept of tipping points, using a critical decolonial view from the Global South.
Melanie A. Thurner, Silvia Caldararu, Jan Engel, Anja Rammig, and Sönke Zaehle
Biogeosciences, 21, 1391–1410, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1391-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1391-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Due to their crucial role in terrestrial ecosystems, we implemented mycorrhizal fungi into the QUINCY terrestrial biosphere model. Fungi interact with mineral and organic soil to support plant N uptake and, thus, plant growth. Our results suggest that the effect of mycorrhizal interactions on simulated ecosystem dynamics is minor under constant environmental conditions but necessary to reproduce and understand observed patterns under changing conditions, such as rising atmospheric CO2.
Benjamin F. Meyer, Allan Buras, Konstantin Gregor, Lucia S. Layritz, Adriana Principe, Jürgen Kreyling, Anja Rammig, and Christian S. Zang
Biogeosciences, 21, 1355–1370, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1355-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-1355-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Late-spring frost (LSF), critically low temperatures when trees have already flushed their leaves, results in freezing damage leaving trees with reduced ability to perform photosynthesis. Forests with a high proportion of susceptible species like European beech are particularly vulnerable. However, this process is rarely included in dynamic vegetation models (DVMs). We show that the effect on simulated productivity and biomass is substantial, warranting more widespread inclusion of LSF in DVMs.
Jennifer A. Holm, David M. Medvigy, Benjamin Smith, Jeffrey S. Dukes, Claus Beier, Mikhail Mishurov, Xiangtao Xu, Jeremy W. Lichstein, Craig D. Allen, Klaus S. Larsen, Yiqi Luo, Cari Ficken, William T. Pockman, William R. L. Anderegg, and Anja Rammig
Biogeosciences, 20, 2117–2142, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-2117-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Unprecedented climate extremes (UCEs) are expected to have dramatic impacts on ecosystems. We present a road map of how dynamic vegetation models can explore extreme drought and climate change and assess ecological processes to measure and reduce model uncertainties. The models predict strong nonlinear responses to UCEs. Due to different model representations, the models differ in magnitude and trajectory of forest loss. Therefore, we explore specific plant responses that reflect knowledge gaps.
Johannes Oberpriller, Christine Herschlein, Peter Anthoni, Almut Arneth, Andreas Krause, Anja Rammig, Mats Lindeskog, Stefan Olin, and Florian Hartig
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 6495–6519, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6495-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-6495-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding uncertainties of projected ecosystem dynamics under environmental change is of immense value for research and climate change policy. Here, we analyzed these across European forests. We find that uncertainties are dominantly induced by parameters related to water, mortality, and climate, with an increasing importance of climate from north to south. These results highlight that climate not only contributes uncertainty but also modifies uncertainties in other ecosystem processes.
Phillip Papastefanou, Christian S. Zang, Zlatan Angelov, Aline Anderson de Castro, Juan Carlos Jimenez, Luiz Felipe Campos De Rezende, Romina C. Ruscica, Boris Sakschewski, Anna A. Sörensson, Kirsten Thonicke, Carolina Vera, Nicolas Viovy, Celso Von Randow, and Anja Rammig
Biogeosciences, 19, 3843–3861, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3843-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-3843-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The Amazon rainforest has been hit by multiple severe drought events. In this study, we assess the severity and spatial extent of the extreme drought years 2005, 2010 and 2015/16 in the Amazon. Using nine different precipitation datasets and three drought indicators we find large differences in drought stress across the Amazon region. We conclude that future studies should use multiple rainfall datasets and drought indicators when estimating the impact of drought stress in the Amazon region.
Mahdi André Nakhavali, Lina M. Mercado, Iain P. Hartley, Stephen Sitch, Fernanda V. Cunha, Raffaello di Ponzio, Laynara F. Lugli, Carlos A. Quesada, Kelly M. Andersen, Sarah E. Chadburn, Andy J. Wiltshire, Douglas B. Clark, Gyovanni Ribeiro, Lara Siebert, Anna C. M. Moraes, Jéssica Schmeisk Rosa, Rafael Assis, and José L. Camargo
Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 5241–5269, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5241-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5241-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
In tropical ecosystems, the availability of rock-derived elements such as P can be very low. Thus, without a representation of P cycling, tropical forest responses to rising atmospheric CO2 conditions in areas such as Amazonia remain highly uncertain. We introduced P dynamics and its interactions with the N and P cycles into the JULES model. Our results highlight the potential for high P limitation and therefore lower CO2 fertilization capacity in the Amazon forest with low-fertility soils.
Lore T. Verryckt, Sara Vicca, Leandro Van Langenhove, Clément Stahl, Dolores Asensio, Ifigenia Urbina, Romà Ogaya, Joan Llusià, Oriol Grau, Guille Peguero, Albert Gargallo-Garriga, Elodie A. Courtois, Olga Margalef, Miguel Portillo-Estrada, Philippe Ciais, Michael Obersteiner, Lucia Fuchslueger, Laynara F. Lugli, Pere-Roc Fernandez-Garberí, Helena Vallicrosa, Melanie Verlinden, Christian Ranits, Pieter Vermeir, Sabrina Coste, Erik Verbruggen, Laëtitia Bréchet, Jordi Sardans, Jérôme Chave, Josep Peñuelas, and Ivan A. Janssens
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We provide a comprehensive dataset of vertical profiles of photosynthesis and important leaf traits, including leaf N and P concentrations, from two 3-year, large-scale nutrient addition experiments conducted in two tropical rainforests in French Guiana. These data present a unique source of information to further improve model representations of the roles of N and P, and other leaf nutrients, in photosynthesis in tropical forests.
Mats Lindeskog, Benjamin Smith, Fredrik Lagergren, Ekaterina Sycheva, Andrej Ficko, Hans Pretzsch, and Anja Rammig
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 6071–6112, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6071-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-6071-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Forests play an important role in the global carbon cycle and for carbon storage. In Europe, forests are intensively managed. To understand how management influences carbon storage in European forests, we implement detailed forest management into the dynamic vegetation model LPJ-GUESS. We test the model by comparing model output to typical forestry measures, such as growing stock and harvest data, for different countries in Europe.
Thomas Janssen, Ype van der Velde, Florian Hofhansl, Sebastiaan Luyssaert, Kim Naudts, Bart Driessen, Katrin Fleischer, and Han Dolman
Biogeosciences, 18, 4445–4472, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4445-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-4445-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Satellite images show that the Amazon forest has greened up during past droughts. Measurements of tree stem growth and leaf litterfall upscaled using machine-learning algorithms show that leaf flushing at the onset of a drought results in canopy rejuvenation and green-up during drought while simultaneously trees excessively shed older leaves and tree stem growth declines. Canopy green-up during drought therefore does not necessarily point to enhanced tree growth and improved forest health.
Gilvan Sampaio, Marília H. Shimizu, Carlos A. Guimarães-Júnior, Felipe Alexandre, Marcelo Guatura, Manoel Cardoso, Tomas F. Domingues, Anja Rammig, Celso von Randow, Luiz F. C. Rezende, and David M. Lapola
Biogeosciences, 18, 2511–2525, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2511-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-2511-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
The impact of large-scale deforestation and the physiological effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on Amazon rainfall are systematically compared in this study. Our results are remarkable in showing that the two disturbances cause equivalent rainfall decrease, though through different causal mechanisms. These results highlight the importance of not only curbing regional deforestation but also reducing global CO2 emissions to avoid climatic changes in the Amazon.
Cited articles
Barrow, N. J., Sen, A., Roy, N., and Debnath, A.: The Soil Phosphate Fractionation Fallacy, Plant Soil, 459, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04476-6, 2020.
Bookhagen, B. and Strecker, M. R.: Orographic Barriers, High-Resolution Trmm Rainfall, and Relief Variations Along the Eastern Andes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L06403, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl032011, 2008.
Breiman, L.: Random Forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5–32, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324, 2001.
Buendía, C., Arens, S., Hickler, T., Higgins, S. I., Porada, P., and Kleidon, A.: On the potential vegetation feedbacks that enhance phosphorus availability – insights from a process-based model linking geological and ecological timescales, Biogeosciences, 11, 3661–3683, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-3661-2014, 2014.
Carter, M. R. and Gregorich, E. G. (Eds.): Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, 2nd edn., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1224 pp., https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420005271, 2007.
Carvalho, R. L., Resende, A. F., Barlow, J., Franca, F. M., Moura, M. R., Maciel, R., Alves-Martins, F., Shutt, J., Nunes, C. A., Elias, F., Silveira, J. M., Stegmann, L., Baccaro, F. B., Juen, L., Schietti, J., Aragao, L., Berenguer, E., Castello, L., Costa, F. R. C., Guedes, M. L., Leal, C. G., Lees, A. C., Isaac, V., Nascimento, R. O., Phillips, O. L., Schmidt, F. A., Ter Steege, H., Vaz-de-Mello, F., Venticinque, E. M., Vieira, I. C. G., Zuanon, J., Synergize, C., and Ferreira, J.: Pervasive Gaps in Amazonian Ecological Research, Curr. Biol., 33, 3495–3504, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.077, 2023.
Castanho, A. D. A., Coe, M. T., Costa, M. H., Malhi, Y., Galbraith, D., and Quesada, C. A.: Improving simulated Amazon forest biomass and productivity by including spatial variation in biophysical parameters, Biogeosciences, 10, 2255–2272, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2255-2013, 2013.
Crameri, F.: Scientific Colour Maps, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.5501399, 2021.
Crameri, F., Shephard, G. E., and Heron, P. J.: The Misuse of Colour in Science Communication, Nat. Commun., 11, 5444, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19160-7, 2020.
Crews, T. E., Kitayama, K., Fownes, J. H., Riley, R. H., Herbert, D. A., Muellerdombois, D., and Vitousek, P. M.: Changes in Soil-Phosphorus Fractions and Ecosystem Dynamics across a Long Chronosequence in Hawaii, Ecology, 76, 1407–1424, https://doi.org/10.2307/1938144, 1995.
Cunha, H. F. V., Andersen, K. M., Lugli, L. F., Santana, F. D., Aleixo, I. F., Moraes, A. M., Garcia, S., Di Ponzio, R., Mendoza, E. O., Brum, B., Rosa, J. S., Cordeiro, A. L., Portela, B. T. T., Ribeiro, G., Coelho, S. D., de Souza, S. T., Silva, L. S., Antonieto, F., Pires, M., Salomao, A. C., Miron, A. C., de Assis, R. L., Domingues, T. F., Aragao, L., Meir, P., Camargo, J. L., Manzi, A. O., Nagy, L., Mercado, L. M., Hartley, I. P., and Quesada, C. A.: Direct Evidence for Phosphorus Limitation on Amazon Forest Productivity, Nature, 608, 558–562, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05085-2, 2022.
Cutler, A., Cutler, D. R., and Stevens, J. R.: Random Forests, in: Ensemble Machine Learning, edited by: Zhang, C., and Ma, Y., Springer US, 157–175, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9326-7_5, 2012.
Darela-Filho, J. P.: Reference Maps of Soil Phosphorus for the Pan-Amazon Region: Source Code and Input Data, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10571880, 2024.
Darela-Filho, J. P. and Lapola, D. M.: Reference Maps of Soil Phosphorus for the Pan-Amazon Region: Code and Data, REDU – Repositório de Dados de Pesquisa da Unicamp [data set], https://doi.org/10.25824/redu/FROESE, 2023.
da Silva, E. C., da Silva Sales, M. V., Aleixo, S., Gama-Rodrigues, A. C., and Gama-Rodrigues, E. F.: Does Structural Equation Modeling Provide a Holistic View of Phosphorus Acquisition Strategies in Soils of Amazon Forest?, J. Soil Sci. Plant Nut., 22, 3334–3347, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-022-00890-0, 2022.
de Myttenaere, A., Golden, B., Le Grand, B., and Rossi, F.: Mean Absolute Percentage Error for Regression Models, Neurocomputing, 192, 38–48, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.114, 2016.
Dijkshoorn, J. A., Huting, J. R. M., and P., T.: Update of the 1:5 Million Soil and Terrain Database for Latin America and the Caribbean (Soterlac; Version 2.0), ISRIC – World Soil Information, Wageningen, https://isric.org/sites/default/files/isric_report_2005_01.pdf (last access: 20 October 2023), 2005.
Du, E. Z., Terrer, C., Pellegrini, A. F. A., Ahlstrom, A., van Lissa, C. J., Zhao, X., Xia, N., Wu, X. H., and Jackson, R. B.: Global Patterns of Terrestrial Nitrogen and Phosphorus Limitation, Nat. Geosci., 13, 221–226, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0530-4, 2020.
Farr, T. G., Rosen, P. A., Caro, E., Crippen, R., Duren, R., Hensley, S., Kobrick, M., Paller, M., Rodriguez, E., Roth, L., Seal, D., Shaffer, S., Shimada, J., Umland, J., Werner, M., Oskin, M., Burbank, D., and Alsdorf, D.: The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission, Rev. Geophys., 45, RG2004, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005rg000183, 2007.
Fick, S. E. and Hijmans, R. J.: Worldclim 2: New 1-Km Spatial Resolution Climate Surfaces for Global Land Areas, Int. J. Climatol., 37, 4302–4315, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086, 2017.
Gama-Rodrigues, A. C., Sales, M. V. S., Silva, P. S. D., Comerford, N. B., Cropper, W. P., and Gama-Rodrigues, E. F.: An Exploratory Analysis of Phosphorus Transformations in Tropical Soils Using Structural Equation Modeling, Biogeochemistry, 118, 453–469, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9946-x, 2014.
Goldstein, A., Kapelner, A., Bleich, J., and Pitkin, E.: Peeking inside the Black Box: Visualizing Statistical Learning with Plots of Individual Conditional Expectation, arXiv [preprint], https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1309.6392, 20 March 2014.
Goll, D. S., Brovkin, V., Parida, B. R., Reick, C. H., Kattge, J., Reich, P. B., van Bodegom, P. M., and Niinemets, Ü.: Nutrient limitation reduces land carbon uptake in simulations with a model of combined carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycling, Biogeosciences, 9, 3547–3569, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-3547-2012, 2012.
Gu, C. H. and Margenot, A. J.: Navigating Limitations and Opportunities of Soil Phosphorus Fractionation, Plant Soil, 459, 13–17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04552-x, 2021.
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., and Tibshirani, R.: The Elements of Statistical Learning, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, New York, NY, XVI, 536 pp., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5, 2001.
He, X., Augusto, L., Goll, D. S., Ringeval, B., Wang, Y., Helfenstein, J., Huang, Y., Yu, K., Wang, Z., Yang, Y., and Hou, E.: Global patterns and drivers of soil total phosphorus concentration, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 5831–5846, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-5831-2021, 2021.
He, X., Augusto, L., Goll, D. S., Ringeval, B., Wang, Y.-P., Helfenstein, J., Huang, Y., and Hou, E.: Global patterns and drivers of phosphorus fractions in natural soils, Biogeosciences, 20, 4147–4163, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4147-2023, 2023.
Hedley, M. J. and Stewart, J. W. B.: Method to Measure Microbial Phosphate in Soils, Soil Biol. Biochem., 14, 377–385, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(82)90009-8, 1982.
Hedley, M. J., Stewart, J. W. B., and Chauhan, B. S.: Changes in Inorganic and Organic Soil-Phosphorus Fractions Induced by Cultivation Practices and by Laboratory Incubations, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 46, 970–976, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1982.03615995004600050017x, 1982.
Helfenstein, J., Tamburini, F., von Sperber, C., Massey, M. S., Pistocchi, C., Chadwick, O. A., Vitousek, P. M., Kretzschmar, R., and Frossard, E.: Combining Spectroscopic and Isotopic Techniques Gives a Dynamic View of Phosphorus Cycling in Soil, Nat. Commun., 9, 3226, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05731-2, 2018.
Helfenstein, J., Pistocchi, C., Oberson, A., Tamburini, F., Goll, D. S., and Frossard, E.: Estimates of mean residence times of phosphorus in commonly considered inorganic soil phosphorus pools, Biogeosciences, 17, 441–454, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-441-2020, 2020.
Hou, E., Tan, X., Heenan, M., and Wen, D.: A Global Dataset of Plant Available and Unavailable Phosphorus in Natural Soils Derived by Hedley Method, Sci. Data, 5, 180166, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.166, 2018.
Howe, J. A. and Smith, A. P.: The Soil Habitat, in: Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology, edited by: Gentry, T. J., Fuhrmann, J. J., and Zuberer, D. A., Elsevier, 23–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-820202-9.00002-2, 2021.
Kuhn, M. and Johnson, K.: Applied Predictive Modeling, 1, Springer, New York, NY, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3, 2013.
Lambers, H.: Phosphorus Acquisition and Utilization in Plants, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 73, 17–42, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-102720-125738, 2022.
Lambers, H., Raven, J. A., Shaver, G. R., and Smith, S. E.: Plant Nutrient-Acquisition Strategies Change with Soil Age, Trends Ecol. Evol., 23, 95–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.008, 2008.
Liese, R., Schulze, J., and Cabeza, R. A.: Nitrate Application or P Deficiency Induce a Decline in Medicago Truncatula N(2)-Fixation by Similar Changes in the Nodule Transcriptome, Sci. Rep., 7, 46264, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46264, 2017.
Lloyd, J., Domingues, T. F., Schrodt, F., Ishida, F. Y., Feldpausch, T. R., Saiz, G., Quesada, C. A., Schwarz, M., Torello-Raventos, M., Gilpin, M., Marimon, B. S., Marimon-Junior, B. H., Ratter, J. A., Grace, J., Nardoto, G. B., Veenendaal, E., Arroyo, L., Villarroel, D., Killeen, T. J., Steininger, M., and Phillips, O. L.: Edaphic, structural and physiological contrasts across Amazon Basin forest–savanna ecotones suggest a role for potassium as a key modulator of tropical woody vegetation structure and function, Biogeosciences, 12, 6529–6571, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-6529-2015, 2015.
Lucas, T. C. D.: A Translucent Box: Interpretable Machine Learning in Ecology, Ecol. Monogr., 90, e01422, https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1422, 2020.
Lugli, L. F., Andersen, K. M., Aragao, L. E. O. C., Cordeiro, A. L., Cunha, H. K. V., Fuchslueger, L., Meir, P., Mercado, L. M., Oblitas, E., Quesada, C. A., Rosa, J. S., Schaap, K. J., Valverde-Barrantes, O., and Hartley, I. P.: Multiple Phosphorus Acquisition Strategies Adopted by Fine Roots in Low-Fertility Soils in Central Amazonia, Plant Soil, 450, 49–63, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-03963-9, 2020.
Meyer, H. and Pebesma, E.: Predicting into Unknown Space? Estimating the Area of Applicability of Spatial Prediction Models, Methods Ecol. Evol., 12, 1620–1633, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13650, 2021.
Osman, K. T.: Sandy Soils, in: Management of Soil Problems, Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 37–65, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75527-4_3, 2018.
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, E.: Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 12, 2825–2830, 2011.
Poggio, L., de Sousa, L. M., Batjes, N. H., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Kempen, B., Ribeiro, E., and Rossiter, D.: SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty, SOIL, 7, 217–240, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-7-217-2021, 2021.
Quesada, C. A., Lloyd, J., Schwarz, M., Patiño, S., Baker, T. R., Czimczik, C., Fyllas, N. M., Martinelli, L., Nardoto, G. B., Schmerler, J., Santos, A. J. B., Hodnett, M. G., Herrera, R., Luizão, F. J., Arneth, A., Lloyd, G., Dezzeo, N., Hilke, I., Kuhlmann, I., Raessler, M., Brand, W. A., Geilmann, H., Moraes Filho, J. O., Carvalho, F. P., Araujo Filho, R. N., Chaves, J. E., Cruz Junior, O. F., Pimentel, T. P., and Paiva, R.: Variations in chemical and physical properties of Amazon forest soils in relation to their genesis, Biogeosciences, 7, 1515–1541, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-1515-2010, 2010.
Quesada, C. A., Lloyd, J., Anderson, L. O., Fyllas, N. M., Schwarz, M., and Czimczik, C. I.: Soils of Amazonia with particular reference to the RAINFOR sites, Biogeosciences, 8, 1415–1440, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-1415-2011, 2011.
Quesada, C. A., Paz, C., Oblitas Mendoza, E., Phillips, O. L., Saiz, G., and Lloyd, J.: Variations in soil chemical and physical properties explain basin-wide Amazon forest soil carbon concentrations, SOIL, 6, 53–88, https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-6-53-2020, 2020.
RAINFOR: Amazon Forest Inventory Network – Manuals, http://rainfor.org/en/manuals/in-the-field, last access: 7 April 2022.
RAISG: Amazon Network of Georeferenced Socio-Environmental Information, https://www.raisg.org/en/about/, last access: 20 October 2023.
Reed, S. C., Cleveland, C. C., and Townsend, A. R.: Relationships among Phosphorus, Molybdenum and Free-Living Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Rain Forests: Results from Observational and Experimental Analyses, Biogeochemistry, 114, 135–147, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9835-3, 2013.
Reichert, T., Rammig, A., Fuchslueger, L., Lugli, L. F., Quesada, C. A., and Fleischer, K.: Plant Phosphorus-Use and -Acquisition Strategies in Amazonia, New Phytol., 234, 1126–1143, https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17985, 2022.
Saatchi, S. S.: Lba-Eco Lc-15 Srtm30 Digital Elevation Model Data, Amazon Basin: 2000, ORNL DAAC [data set], https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1181, 2013.
Schubert, S., Steffens, D., and Ashraf, I.: Is Occluded Phosphate Plant-Available?, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 183, 338–344, https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201900402, 2020.
Simon, S. M., Glaum, P., and Valdovinos, F. S.: Interpreting Random Forest Analysis of Ecological Models to Move from Prediction to Explanation, Sci. Rep., 13, 3881, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30313-8, 2023.
Smeck, N. E.: Phosphorus Dynamics in Soils and Landscapes, Geoderma, 36, 185–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(85)90001-1, 1985.
Stone, M.: Cross-Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B Met., 36, 111–133, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x, 1974.
Val, P., Figueiredo, J., Melo, G., Flantua, S. G. A., Quesada, C. A., Fan, Y., Albert, J. S., Guayasamin, J. M., and Hoorn, C.: Geological History and Geodiversity of the Amazon, in: Amazon Assessment Report 2021, edited by: Nobre, C., Encalada, A., Anderson, E., Roca, A. F. H., Bustamante, M., Mena, C., Peña-Claros, M., Poveda, G., Rodriguez, J. P., Saleska, S., Trumbore, S., Val, A. L., Villa, N. L., Abramovay, R., Alencar, A., Rodríguez, A. C., Armenteras, D., Artaxo, P., Athayde, S., Barretto Filho, H. T., Barlow, J., Berenguer, E., Bortolotto, F., Costa, F. A., Costa, M. H., Cuvi, N., Fearnside, P. M., Ferreira, J., Flores, B. M., Frieri, S., Gatti, L. V., Guayasamin, J. M., Hecht, S., Hirota, M., Hoorn, C., Josse, C., Lapola, D. M., Larrea, C., Larrea-Alcazar, D. M., Lehm, A. Z., Malhi, Y., Marengo, J. A., Melack, J., Moraes, R. M., Moutinho, P., Murmis, M. R., Neves, E. G., Paez, B., Painter, L., Ramos, A., Rosero-Peña, M. C., Schmink, M., Sist, P., ter Steege, H., van der Voort, H., Varese, M., and Zapata-Ríos, G.: United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network, New York, USA, https://doi.org/10.55161/POFE6241, 2021.
Van Langenhove, L., Depaepe, T., Verryckt, L. T., Vallicrosa, H., Fuchslueger, L., Lugli, L. F., Bréchet, L., Ogaya, R., Llusia, J., Urbina, I., Gargallo-Garriga, A., Grau, O., Richter, A., Penuelas, J., Van Der Straeten, D., and Janssens, I. A.: Impact of Nutrient Additions on Free-Living Nitrogen Fixation in Litter and Soil of Two French-Guianese Lowland Tropical Forests, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 126, e2020JG006023, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020jg006023, 2021.
Vitousek, P. M., Porder, S., Houlton, B. Z., and Chadwick, O. A.: Terrestrial Phosphorus Limitation: Mechanisms, Implications, and Nitrogen-Phosphorus Interactions, Ecol. Appl., 20, 5–15, https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0127.1, 2010.
Walker, T. W. and Syers, J. K.: Fate of Phosphorus During Pedogenesis, Geoderma, 15, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(76)90066-5, 1976.
Wang, Y. P., Law, R. M., and Pak, B.: A global model of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles for the terrestrial biosphere, Biogeosciences, 7, 2261–2282, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-2261-2010, 2010.
Wilcke, W., Velescu, A., Leimer, S., Bigalke, M., Boy, J., and Valarezo, C.: Temporal Trends of Phosphorus Cycling in a Tropical Montane Forest in Ecuador During 14 years, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 124, 1370–1386, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jg004942, 2019.
Wittmann, H., von Blanckenburg, F., Maurice, L., Guyot, J. L., Filizola, N., and Kubik, P. W.: Sediment Production and Delivery in the Amazon River Basin Quantified by in Situ-Produced Cosmogenic Nuclides and Recent River Loads, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 123, 934–950, https://doi.org/10.1130/B30317.1, 2011.
Wollast, R., Mackenzie, F. T., and Chou, L.: Interactions of C, N, P and S Biogeochemical Cycles and Global Change, Nato Asi Series. Series I: Global Environmental Change, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 521 pp., https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76064-8, 1993.
Wong, M. Y., Neill, C., Marino, R., Silvério, D. V., Brando, P. M., and Howarth, R. W.: Biological Nitrogen Fixation Does Not Replace Nitrogen Losses after Forest Fires in the Southeastern Amazon, Ecosystems, 23, 1037–1055, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-019-00453-y, 2020.
Yang, X. and Post, W. M.: Phosphorus transformations as a function of pedogenesis: A synthesis of soil phosphorus data using Hedley fractionation method, Biogeosciences, 8, 2907–2916, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2907-2011, 2011.
Yang, X., Post, W. M., Thornton, P. E., and Jain, A.: The distribution of soil phosphorus for global biogeochemical modeling, Biogeosciences, 10, 2525–2537, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-2525-2013, 2013.
Yang, X., Post, W. M., Thornton, P. E., and Jain, A. K.: Global Gridded Soil Phosphorus Distribution Maps at 0.5-Degree Resolution, ORNL DAAC [data set], https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1223, 2014.
Zhang, L. M., Silvano, E., Rihtman, B., Aguilo-Ferretjans, M., Han, B., Shi, W., and Chen, Y.: Biochemical Mechanism of Phosphorus Limitation Impairing Nitrogen Fixation in Diazotrophic Bacterium Klebsiella Variicola, Journal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 1, 108–117, https://doi.org/10.1002/sae2.12024, 2022.
Short summary
Phosphorus (P) is crucial for plant growth, and scientists have created models to study how it interacts with carbon cycle in ecosystems. To apply these models, it is important to know the distribution of phosphorus in soil. In this study we estimated the distribution of phosphorus in the Amazon region. The results showed a clear gradient of soil development and P content. These maps can help improve ecosystem models and generate new hypotheses about phosphorus availability in the Amazon.
Phosphorus (P) is crucial for plant growth, and scientists have created models to study how it...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint