Thank you for the recommendations you provided. The rationale behind selecting this particular journal stems from the fact that our paper aims to present an original and validated dataset, aligning precisely with the objectives of the journal. Furthermore, the journal explicitly discourages process studies, which aligns with our paper's focus.

Allow me to append the Aims & Scope of the journal:

“Articles in the data section may pertain to the planning, instrumentation, and execution of experiments or collection of data. Any interpretation of data is outside the scope of regular articles.”

After the validation of the data, our intention is to utilize it for conducting a process study. Additionally, we will enhance the figures as per the provided suggestions.

Thank you sincerely for all your valuable suggestions and recommendations. Your input will play a significant role in enhancing the quality of our paper. We will carefully consider all your comments, revise and summarize the text as suggested, and incorporate statistical analyses to rectify any data discrepancies.

Regarding the use of logarithms in the oxygen correction method, we acknowledge that a typographical error led to the inclusion of logarithms in the methods section. Specifically, the natural logarithm was employed for the oxygen correction. This will be corrected accordingly.

Following these adjustments, we will submit the revised manuscript for your review. Once again, we deeply appreciate your invaluable assistance.