Articles | Volume 14, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3115-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-3115-2022
© Author(s) 2022. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Data description paper
| 
08 Jul 2022
Data description paper |
| 08 Jul 2022
| 08 Jul 2022
A Central Asia hydrologic monitoring dataset for food and water security applications in Afghanistan
Amy McNally
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Science Applications International Corporation Inc., Reston, VA 20190, United States
U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC 20523, United States
Jossy Jacob
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, MD 20706, United States
Kristi Arsenault
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Science Applications International Corporation Inc., Reston, VA 20190, United States
Kimberly Slinski
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, United States
Daniel P. Sarmiento
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Science Applications International Corporation Inc., Reston, VA 20190, United States
Andrew Hoell
Physical Science Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO 80305, United States
Shahriar Pervez
Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Federal Data Solutions, Contractor to U.S. Geological Survey, Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, United States
James Rowland
EROS Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, United States
Mike Budde
EROS Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, SD 57198, United States
Sujay Kumar
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
Christa Peters-Lidard
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States
James P. Verdin
U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC 20523, United States
Related authors
Bailing Li, Abheera Hazra, Amy McNally, Kimberly Slinski, Shraddhanand Shukla, and Weston Anderson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4198, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4198, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Accurately predicting total water storage in soils and aquifers is vital for managing droughts, floods and food insecurity. This study evaluates subseasonal to seasonal forecasts of terrestrial water storage (TWS) across Africa using satellite gravity data. Results show that models with better groundwater representation provide more reliable TWS forecasts. The findings highlight the importance of satellite observations for improving water resource prediction.
Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy, Louise Busschaert, Michel Bechtold, Niccolò Lanfranco, Shannon de Roos, Zdenko Heyvaert, Jonas Mortelmans, Samuel A. Scherrer, Maxime Van den Bossche, Sujay Kumar, David M. Mocko, Eric Kemp, Lee Heng, Pasquale Steduto, and Dirk Raes
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4417, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4417, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Geoscientific Model Development (GMD).
Short summary
Short summary
To facilitate regional crop growth simulations at any spatial resolution, with a range of different input sources for meteorology, soil and crop parameters, we have incorporated the AquaCrop model into the NASA Land Information System. This system also facilitates the assimilation of satellite data to update the crop and water conditions during model simulations. We present three exploratory applications to highlight the possibilities and pathways for future research on crop estimation.
Bailing Li, Abheera Hazra, Amy McNally, Kimberly Slinski, Shraddhanand Shukla, and Weston Anderson
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4198, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-4198, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
Accurately predicting total water storage in soils and aquifers is vital for managing droughts, floods and food insecurity. This study evaluates subseasonal to seasonal forecasts of terrestrial water storage (TWS) across Africa using satellite gravity data. Results show that models with better groundwater representation provide more reliable TWS forecasts. The findings highlight the importance of satellite observations for improving water resource prediction.
Pengfei Xue, Chenfu Huang, Yafang Zhong, Michael Notaro, Miraj B. Kayastha, Xing Zhou, Chuyan Zhao, Christa Peters-Lidard, Carlos Cruz, and Eric Kemp
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 4293–4316, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4293-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-4293-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study introduces a new 3D lake–ice–atmosphere coupled model that significantly improves winter climate simulations for the Great Lakes compared to traditional 1D lake model coupling. The key contribution is the identification of critical hydrodynamic processes – ice transport, heat advection, and shear-driven turbulence production – that influence lake thermal structure and ice cover and explain the superior performance of 3D lake models to their 1D counterparts.
Louise Busschaert, Michel Bechtold, Sara Modanesi, Christian Massari, Dirk Raes, Sujay V. Kumar, and Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2550, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2550, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS).
Short summary
Short summary
This study estimates irrigation in the Po Valley using AquaCrop and Noah-MP models with sprinkler irrigation. Noah-MP shows higher annual rates than AquaCrop due to more water losses. After adjusting, both align with reported irrigation ranges (500–600 mm/yr). Soil moisture estimates from both models match satellite data, though both have limitations in vegetation and evapotranspiration modeling. The study emphasizes the need for observations to improve irrigation estimates.
Cenlin He, Tzu-Shun Lin, David M. Mocko, Ronnie Abolafia-Rosenzweig, Jerry W. Wegiel, and Sujay V. Kumar
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4176, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-4176, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This study integrates the refactored community Noah-MP version 5.0 model with the NASA Land Information System (LIS) version 7.5.2 to streamline the synchronization, development, and maintenance of Noah-MP within LIS and to enhance their interoperability and applicability. The model benchmarking and evaluation results reveal key model strengths and weaknesses in simulating land surface quantities and show implications for future model improvements.
Min Huang, Gregory R. Carmichael, Kevin W. Bowman, Isabelle De Smedt, Andreas Colliander, Michael H. Cosh, Sujay V. Kumar, Alex B. Guenther, Scott J. Janz, Ryan M. Stauffer, Anne M. Thompson, Niko M. Fedkin, Robert J. Swap, John D. Bolten, and Alicia T. Joseph
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1449–1476, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1449-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1449-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We use model simulations along with multiplatform, multidisciplinary observations and a range of analysis methods to estimate and understand the distributions, temporal changes, and impacts of reactive nitrogen and ozone over the most populous US region that has undergone significant environmental changes. Deposition, biogenic emissions, and extra-regional sources have been playing increasingly important roles in controlling pollutant budgets in this area as local anthropogenic emissions drop.
Melissa Leah Breeden, Andrew Hoell, Rochelle Pauline Worsnop, John Robert Albers, Michael T. Hobbins, Rachel Maya Robinson, and Daniel James Vimont
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-115, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-115, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
We explore the predictability of saturation vapor pressure deficit (VPD), a key indicator of wildfire danger, one to 18 months in advance. Seasonal VPD forecasts are generated using a statistical dynamical model that produces high VPD skill related to a long-term warming trend and sea surface temperatures. Understanding where forecast skill comes from is important to for improving forecast models, and this study shows the role of multiple unique processes in contributing to VPD forecasts.
Peyman Abbaszadeh, Fadji Zaouna Maina, Chen Yang, Dan Rosen, Sujay Kumar, Matthew Rodell, and Reed Maxwell
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-280, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2024-280, 2024
Revised manuscript accepted for HESS
Short summary
Short summary
To manage Earth's water resources effectively amid climate change, it's crucial to understand both surface and groundwater processes. We developed a new modeling system that combines two advanced tools, ParFlow and LIS/Noah-MP, to better simulate both land surface and groundwater interactions. By testing this integrated model in the Upper Colorado River Basin, we found it improves predictions of hydrologic processes, especially in complex terrains.
Louise Busschaert, Michel Bechtold, Sara Modanesi, Christian Massari, Dirk Raes, Sujay V. Kumar, and Gabrielle J. M. De Lannoy
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4974019, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4974019, 2024
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
This study estimates irrigation in the Po Valley using AquaCrop and Noah-MP models with sprinkler irrigation. Noah-MP shows higher annual rates than AquaCrop due to more water losses. After adjusting, both align with reported irrigation ranges (500–600 mm/yr). Soil moisture estimates from both models match satellite data, though both have limitations in vegetation and evapotranspiration modeling. The study emphasizes the need for observations to improve irrigation estimates.
Justin M. Pflug, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Sujay V. Kumar, Eunsang Cho, Kristi R. Arsenault, Paul R. Houser, and Carrie M. Vuyovich
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 28, 631–648, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-631-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-631-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Estimates of 250 m of snow water equivalent in the western USA and Canada are improved by assimilating observations representative of a snow-focused satellite mission with a land surface model. Here, by including a gap-filling strategy, snow estimates could be improved in forested regions where remote sensing is challenging. This approach improved estimates of winter maximum snow water volume to within 4 %, on average, with persistent improvements to both spring snow and runoff in many regions.
Melissa Leah Breeden, Andrew Hoell, John Robert Albers, and Kimberly Slinski
Weather Clim. Dynam., 4, 963–980, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-963-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-4-963-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We compare the month-to-month evolution of daily precipitation over central southwest Asia (CSWA), a data-sparse, food-insecure area prone to drought and flooding. The seasonality of CSWA precipitation aligns with the seasonality of warm conveyor belts (WCBs), the warm, rapidly ascending airstreams associated with extratropical storms, most common from February–April. El Niño conditions are related to more WCBs and precipitation and La Niña conditions the opposite, except in January.
Eunsang Cho, Yonghwan Kwon, Sujay V. Kumar, and Carrie M. Vuyovich
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 27, 4039–4056, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4039-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-4039-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
An airborne gamma-ray remote-sensing technique provides reliable snow water equivalent (SWE) in a forested area where remote-sensing techniques (e.g., passive microwave) typically have large uncertainties. Here, we explore the utility of assimilating the gamma snow data into a land surface model to improve the modeled SWE estimates in the northeastern US. Results provide new insights into utilizing the gamma SWE data for enhanced land surface model simulations in forested environments.
Eunsang Cho, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Melissa L. Wrzesien, and Rhae Sung Kim
The Cryosphere, 17, 3915–3931, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3915-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-3915-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
As a future snow mission concept, active microwave sensors have the potential to measure snow water equivalent (SWE) in deep snowpack and forested environments. We used a modeling and data assimilation approach (a so-called observing system simulation experiment) to quantify the usefulness of active microwave-based SWE retrievals over western Colorado. We found that active microwave sensors with a mature retrieval algorithm can improve SWE simulations by about 20 % in the mountainous domain.
Eunsang Cho, Carrie M. Vuyovich, Sujay V. Kumar, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Rhae Sung Kim, and Jennifer M. Jacobs
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 5721–5735, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-5721-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
While land surface models are a common approach for estimating macroscale snow water equivalent (SWE), the SWE accuracy is often limited by uncertainties in model physics and forcing inputs. In this study, we found large underestimations of modeled SWE compared to observations. Precipitation forcings and melting physics limitations dominantly contribute to the SWE underestimations. Results provide insights into prioritizing strategies to improve the SWE simulations for hydrologic applications.
Melissa L. Breeden, John R. Albers, and Andrew Hoell
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 1183–1197, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1183-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-1183-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We use a statistical dynamical model to generate precipitation forecasts for lead times of 2–6 weeks over southwest Asia, which are needed to support humanitarian food distribution. The model signal-to-noise ratio is used to identify a smaller subset of forecasts with particularly high skill, so-called subseasonal forecasts of opportunity (SFOs). Precipitation SFOs are often related to slowly evolving tropical phenomena, namely the El Niño–Southern Oscillation and Madden–Julian Oscillation.
Min Huang, James H. Crawford, Gregory R. Carmichael, Kevin W. Bowman, Sujay V. Kumar, and Colm Sweeney
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7461–7487, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7461-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7461-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study demonstrates that ozone dry-deposition modeling can be improved by revising the model's dry-deposition parameterizations to better represent the effects of environmental conditions including the soil moisture fields. Applying satellite soil moisture data assimilation is shown to also have added value. Such advancements in coupled modeling and data assimilation can benefit the assessments of ozone impacts on human and vegetation health.
Wanshu Nie, Sujay V. Kumar, Kristi R. Arsenault, Christa D. Peters-Lidard, Iliana E. Mladenova, Karim Bergaoui, Abheera Hazra, Benjamin F. Zaitchik, Sarith P. Mahanama, Rachael McDonnell, David M. Mocko, and Mahdi Navari
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2365–2386, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2365-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2365-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The MENA (Middle East and North Africa) region faces significant food and water insecurity and hydrological hazards. Here we investigate the value of assimilating remote sensing data sets into an Earth system model to help build an effective drought monitoring system and support risk mitigation and management by countries in the region. We highlight incorporating satellite-informed vegetation conditions into the model as being one of the key processes for a successful application for the region.
Jawairia A. Ahmad, Barton A. Forman, and Sujay V. Kumar
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 26, 2221–2243, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2221-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-26-2221-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Assimilation of remotely sensed data into a land surface model to improve the spatiotemporal estimation of soil moisture across South Asia exhibits potential. Satellite retrieval assimilation corrects biases that are generated due to an unmodeled hydrologic phenomenon, i.e., irrigation. The improvements in fine-scale, modeled soil moisture estimates by assimilating coarse-scale retrievals indicates the utility of the described methodology for data-scarce regions.
Min Huang, James H. Crawford, Joshua P. DiGangi, Gregory R. Carmichael, Kevin W. Bowman, Sujay V. Kumar, and Xiwu Zhan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11013–11040, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11013-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11013-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study evaluates the impact of satellite soil moisture data assimilation on modeled weather and ozone fields at various altitudes above the southeastern US during the summer. It emphasizes the importance of soil moisture in the understanding of surface ozone pollution and upper tropospheric chemistry, as well as air pollutants’ source–receptor relationships between the US and its downwind areas.
Michiel Maertens, Gabriëlle J. M. De Lannoy, Sebastian Apers, Sujay V. Kumar, and Sarith P. P. Mahanama
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 4099–4125, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4099-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-4099-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this study, we simulated the water balance over the South American Dry Chaco and assessed the impact of land cover changes thereon using three different land surface models. Our simulations indicated that different models result in a different partitioning of the total water budget, but all showed an increase in soil moisture and percolation over the deforested areas. We also found that, relative to independent data, no specific land surface model is significantly better than another.
Rhae Sung Kim, Sujay Kumar, Carrie Vuyovich, Paul Houser, Jessica Lundquist, Lawrence Mudryk, Michael Durand, Ana Barros, Edward J. Kim, Barton A. Forman, Ethan D. Gutmann, Melissa L. Wrzesien, Camille Garnaud, Melody Sandells, Hans-Peter Marshall, Nicoleta Cristea, Justin M. Pflug, Jeremy Johnston, Yueqian Cao, David Mocko, and Shugong Wang
The Cryosphere, 15, 771–791, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-771-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-15-771-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
High SWE uncertainty is observed in mountainous and forested regions, highlighting the need for high-resolution snow observations in these regions. Substantial uncertainty in snow water storage in Tundra regions and the dominance of water storage in these regions points to the need for high-accuracy snow estimation. Finally, snow measurements during the melt season are most needed at high latitudes, whereas observations at near peak snow accumulations are most beneficial over the midlatitudes.
Yifan Zhou, Benjamin F. Zaitchik, Sujay V. Kumar, Kristi R. Arsenault, Mir A. Matin, Faisal M. Qamer, Ryan A. Zamora, and Kiran Shakya
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 41–61, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-41-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-41-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
South and Southeast Asia face significant food insecurity and hydrological hazards. Here we introduce a South and Southeast Asia hydrological monitoring and sub-seasonal to seasonal forecasting system (SAHFS-S2S) to help local governments and decision-makers prepare for extreme hydroclimatic events. The monitoring system captures soil moisture variability well in most regions, and the forecasting system offers skillful prediction of soil moisture variability 2–3 months in advance, on average.
Cited articles
Arsenault, K. R., Houser, P. R., and De Lannoy, G. J. M.: Evaluation of the
MODIS snow cover fraction product: Satellite-based snow cover fraction
evaluation, Hydrol. Process., 28, 980–998,
https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9636, 2014.
Arsenault, K. R., Kumar, S. V., Geiger, J. V., Wang, S., Kemp, E., Mocko, D. M., Beaudoing, H. K., Getirana, A., Navari, M., Li, B., Jacob, J., Wegiel, J., and Peters-Lidard, C. D.: The Land surface Data Toolkit (LDT v7.2) – a data fusion environment for land data assimilation systems, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 3605–3621, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-3605-2018, 2018.
Barlage, M., Zeng, X., Wei, H., and Mitchell, K. E.: A global
0.05∘ maximum albedo dataset of snow-covered land based on MODIS
observations: Maximum Albedo of Snow-covered, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L17405,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022881, 2005.
Barlow, M., Wheeler, M., Lyon, B., and Cullen, H.: Modulation of Daily
Precipitation over Southwest Asia by the Madden–Julian Oscillation, Mon.
Weather Rev., 133, 3579–3594, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR3026.1, 2005.
Barlow, M., Zaitchik, B., Paz, S., Black, E., Evans, J., and Hoell, A.: A
Review of Drought in the Middle East and Southwest Asia, J. Climate,
29, 8547–8574, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00692.1, 2016.
Carroll, M., DiMiceli, C., Wooten, M., Hubbard, A., Sohlberg, R., and
Townshend, J.: MOD44W MODIS/Terra Land Water Mask Derived from MODIS and
SRTM L3 Global 250 m SIN Grid V006 NASA EOSDIS Land Processes
DAAC [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD44W.006, 2017.
Chen, F., Mitchell, K., Schaake, J., Xue, Y., Pan, H.-L., Koren, V., Duan,
Q. Y., Ek, M., and Betts, A.: Modeling of land surface evaporation by four
schemes and comparison with FIFE observations, J. Geophys. Res., 101,
7251–7268, https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD02165, 1996.
CIA World Factbook: Afghanistan, https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/afghanistan/#introduction, last access: 24 June 2022.
Cosgrove, B. A., Lohmann, D., Mitchell, K. E., Houser, P. R., Wood, E. F.,
Schaake, J. C., Robock, A., Marshall, C., Sheffield, J., Duan, Q., Luo, L.,
Higgins, R. W., Pinker, R. T., Tarpley, J. D., and Meng, J.: Real-time and
retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation System
(NLDAS) project, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 2002JD003118,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003118, 2003.
CPC NOAA: Weather Hazards Outlook of Afghanistan and Central Asia for the
Period of February 22–28, https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/international/data.shtml (last access: 28 June 2022), 2018.
Csiszar, I. and Gutman, G.: Mapping global land surface albedo from NOAA
AVHRR, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 6215–6228, https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200090, 1999.
Davenport, F. M., Harrison, L., Shukla, S., Husak, G., Funk, C., and
McNally, A.: Using out-of-sample yield forecast experiments to evaluate
which earth observation products best indicate end of season maize yields,
Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 124095, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ccd,
2019.
Derber, J. C., Parrish, D. F., and Lord, S. J.: The New Global Operational
Analysis System at the National Meteorological Center, Weather
Forecast., 6, 538–547,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1991)006<0538:TNGOAS>2.0.CO;2, 1991.
Dezfuli, A. K., Ichoku, C. M., Huffman, G. J., Mohr, K. I., Selker, J. S.,
van de Giesen, N., Hochreutener, R., and Annor, F. O.: Validation of IMERG
Precipitation in Africa, J. Hydrometeorol., 18, 2817–2825,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-17-0139.1, 2017.
Ek, M. B., Mitchell, K. E., Lin, Y., Rogers, E., Grunmann, P., Koren, V.,
Gayno, G., and Tarpley, J. D.: Implementation of Noah land surface model
advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational
mesoscale Eta model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8851,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003296, 2003.
Ellenburg, W. L., Mishra, V., Roberts, J. B., Limaye, A. S., Case, J. L.,
Blankenship, C. B., and Cressman, K.: Detecting Desert Locust Breeding
Grounds: A Satellite-Assisted Modeling Approach, Remote Sensing, 13, 1276,
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13071276, 2021.
Entekhabi, D., Njoku, E. G., O'Neill, P. E., Kellogg, K. H., Crow, W. T.,
Edelstein, W. N., Entin, J. K., Goodman, S. D., Jackson, T. J., Johnson, J.,
Kimball, J., Piepmeier, J. R., Koster, R. D., Martin, N., McDonald, K. C.,
Moghaddam, M., Moran, S., Reichle, R., Shi, J. C., Spencer, M. W., Thurman,
S. W., Tsang, L., and Zyl, J. V.: The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP)
Mission, P. IEEE, 98, 704–716, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2043918, 2010.
Entekhabi, D., Das, N., Njoku, E. G., Johnson, J., and Shi, J. C.: SMAP L3
Radar/Radiometer Global Daily 9 km EASE-Grid Soil Moisture, Version 3, NASA
National Snow and Ice Data Center DAAC [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5067/7KKNQ5UURM2W, 2016.
FEWS NET: Afghanistan Food Security Outlook October 2017–May 2018 Conflict,
dry spells, and weak labor opportunities will lead to deterioration in
outcomes during 2018 lean season, https://fews.net/central-asia/afghanistan/food-security-outlook/october-2017 (last access: 28 June 2022), 2017a.
FEWS NET: Update on performance of the October 2016–May 2017 wet season, https://fews.net/central-asia/afghanistan/special-report/february-10-2017 (last access: 28 June 2022),
2017b.
FEWS NET: Afghanistan Food Security Outlook: Emergency assistance needs are
atypically high through the lean season across the country, FEWS NET, https://fews.net/sites/default/files/documents/reports/AFGHANISTAN Food Security Outlook Oct. 2018 - May 2019.pdf (last access: 28 June 2022), 2018a.
FEWS NET: Afghanistan Food Security Outlook February to September 2018: Low
snow accumulation and dry soil conditions likely to impact 2018 staple
production, https://fews.net/sites/default/files/documents/reports/AFGHANISTAN Food Security Outlook_Feb_Sept 2018.pdf (last access: 28 June 2022), 2018b.
FEWS NET: Afghanistan Food Security Outlook Update April 2018: Poor
rangeland conditions and below-average water availability will limit
seasonal improvements, https://fews.net/central-asia/afghanistan/food-security-outlook-update/april-2018 (last access: 28 June 2022), 2018c.
FEWS NET: El Niño and Precipitation, FEWS NET,
https://fews.net/el-nino-and-precipitation (last access:, last access: 28 June 2022), 2020a.
FEWS NET: La Niña and Precipitation, FEWS NET,
https://fews.net/la-nina-and-precipitation(last access:, last access: 28 June 2022), 2020b.
FEWS NET: Afghanistan Food Security Outlook February to September 2021:
Below-average precipitation likely to drive below-average agricultural and
livestock production in 2021, https://fews.net/sites/default/files/documents/reports/AFGHANISTAN_Food_Security_Outlook_FINAL_1.pdf (last access: 28 June 2022), 2021.
Funk, C., Peterson, P., Landsfeld, M., Pedreros, D., Verdin, J., Shukla, S.,
Husak, G., Rowland, J., Harrison, L., Hoell, A., and Michaelsen, J.: The climate hazards infrared precipitation
with stations – a new environmental record for monitoring extremes, Sci.
Data, 2, 150066, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66, 2015.
Funk, C. C., Peterson, P., Huffman, G. J., Landsfeld, M. F., Peters-Lidard,
C., Davenport, F., Shukla, S., Peterson, S., Pedreros, D. H., Ruane, A. C.,
Mutter, C., Turner, W., Harrison, L., Sonnier, A., Way-Henthorne, J., and
Husak, G. J.: Introducing and Evaluating the Climate Hazards Center IMERG
with Stations (CHIMES): Timely Station-Enhanced Integrated Multisatellite
Retrievals for Global Precipitation Measurement, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E429–E454,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0245.1, 2022.
Gadelha, A. N., Coelho, V. H. R., Xavier, A. C., Barbosa, L. R., Melo, D. C.
D., Xuan, Y., Huffman, G. J., Petersen, W. A., and Almeida, C. D. N.: Grid
box-level evaluation of IMERG over Brazil at various space and time scales,
Atmos. Res., 218, 231–244,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.12.001, 2019.
Geiger, J. and Kumar, S.: Land Information System Framework version LISF-public-7.3.2 forked as almcnall/LISF: LISF-public-7.3.2, Zenodo [code], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6795120, 2021.
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan,
K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A.,
da Silva, A. M., Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D.,
Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M.,
Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective
Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30,
5419–5454, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1, 2017.
GEOGLAM: Early Warning Crop Monitor February 2018,
https://cropmonitor.org/documents/EWCM/reports/EarlyWarning_CropMonitor_201802.pdf (last access: 28 June 2022), 2018a.
GEOGLAM: Early Warning Crop Monitor March 2018,
https://cropmonitor.org/documents/EWCM/reports/EarlyWarning_CropMonitor_201803.pdf (last access: 28 June 2022), 2018b.
Ghatak, D., Zaitchik, B., Kumar, S., Matin, M. A., Bajracharya, B., Hain,
C., and Anderson, M.: Influence of Precipitation Forcing Uncertainty on
Hydrological Simulations with the NASA South Asia Land Data Assimilation
System, Hydrology, 5, 57, https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology5040057, 2018.
Grace, K. and Davenport, F.: Climate variability and health in extremely
vulnerable communities: investigating variations in surface water conditions
and food security in the West African Sahel, Popul. Environ.,
42, 553–577, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-021-00375-9, 2021.
Gutman, G. and Ignatov, A.: The derivation of the green vegetation fraction
from NOAA/AVHRR data for use in numerical weather prediction models,
Int. J. Remote Sens., 19, 1533–1543,
https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698215333, 1998.
Hall, D. and Riggs, G.: MODIS/Terra Snow Cover Daily L3 Global 500 m SIN Grid,
version 6, National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD10A1.006, 2016.
Hengl, T., Jesus, J. M. de, Heuvelink, G. B. M., Gonzalez, M. R., Kilibarda,
M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X.,
Bauer-Marschallinger, B., Guevara, M. A., Vargas, R., MacMillan, R. A.,
Batjes, N. H., Leenaars, J. G. B., Ribeiro, E., Wheeler, I., Mantel, S., and
Kempen, B.: SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine
learning, PLOS ONE, 12, e0169748,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169748, 2017.
Hewitt, C., Mason, S., and Walland, D.: The Global Framework for Climate
Services, Nat. Clim. Change, 2, 831–832,
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1745, 2012.
Hoell, A., Funk, C., and Barlow, M.: The Forcing of Southwestern Asia
Teleconnections by Low-Frequency Sea Surface Temperature Variability during
Boreal Winter, J. Climate, 28, 1511–1526,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00344.1, 2015.
Hoell, A., Barlow, M., Cannon, F., and Xu, T.: Oceanic Origins of Historical
Southwest Asia Precipitation During the Boreal Cold Season, J. Climate, 30,
2885–2903, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0519.1, 2017.
Hoell, A., Cannon, F., and Barlow, M.: Middle East and Southwest Asia Daily
Precipitation Characteristics Associated with the Madden–Julian Oscillation
during Boreal Winter, J. Climate, 31, 8843–8860,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-18-0059.1, 2018.
Hoell, A., Eischeid, J., Barlow, M., and McNally, A.: Characteristics,
precursors, and potential predictability of Amu Darya Drought in an Earth
system model large ensemble, Clim. Dynam., 55, 2185–2206,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-020-05381-5, 2020.
Huffman, G. J., Stocker, E. F., Bolvin, D. T., Nelkin, E. J., and Tan, J.: GPM IMERG Late Precipitation L3 1 day 0.1 degree × 0.1 degree V06, Edited by Andrey Savtchenko, Greenbelt, MD, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/GPM/IMERGDL/DAY/06, 2019.
Huffman, G. J., Bolvin, D. T., Braithwaite, D., Hsu, K.-L., Joyce, R. J.,
Kidd, C., Nelkin, E. J., Sorooshian, S., Stocker, E. F., Tan, J., Wolff, D.
B., and Xie, P.: Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for the Global
Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission (IMERG), in: Satellite Precipitation
Measurement: Volume 1, edited by: Levizzani, V., Kidd, C., Kirschbaum, D.
B., Kummerow, C. D., Nakamura, K., and Turk, F. J., Springer International
Publishing, Cham, 343–353, ISBN 978-3-030-24568-9,
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24568-9_19, 2020.
Immerzeel, W. W., Wanders, N., Lutz, A. F., Shea, J. M., and Bierkens, M. F. P.: Reconciling high-altitude precipitation in the upper Indus basin with glacier mass balances and runoff, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 19, 4673–4687, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-4673-2015, 2015.
Jacob, J. and Slinski, K.: FLDAS Noah Land Surface Model L4 Central Asia Daily 0.01 × 0.01 degree, Greenbelt, MD, USA, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], https://doi.org/10.5067/VQ4CD3Y9YC0R, 2021.
Jung, H. C., Getirana, A., Policelli, F., McNally, A., Arsenault, K. R.,
Kumar, S., Tadesse, T., and Peters-Lidard, C. D.: Upper Blue Nile basin
water budget from a multi-model perspective, J. Hydrol., 555,
535–546, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.10.040, 2017.
Jung, H. C., Getirana, A., Arsenault, K. R., Holmes, T. R. H., and McNally,
A.: Uncertainties in Evapotranspiration Estimates over West Africa, Remote
Sensing, 11, 892, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11080892, 2019.
Kato, H. and Rodell, M.: Sensitivity of Land Surface Simulations to Model
Physics, Land Characteristics, and Forcings, at Four CEOP Sites, J.
Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 85A, 187–204,
https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.85A.187, 2007.
Kirschbaum, D. B., Huffman, G. J., Adler, R. F., Braun, S., Garrett, K.,
Jones, E., McNally, A., Skofronick-Jackson, G., Stocker, E., Wu, H., and
Zaitchik, B. F.: NASA's Remotely Sensed Precipitation: A Reservoir for
Applications Users, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1169–1184,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00296.1, 2016.
Kumar, S. V., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Tian, Y., Houser, P. R., Geiger, J.,
Olden, S., Lighty, L., Eastman, J. L., Doty, B., Dirmeyer, P., Adams, J.,
Mitchell, K., Wood, E. F., and Sheffield, J.: Land information system: An
interoperable framework for high resolution land surface modeling,
Environ. Modell. Softw., 21, 1402–1415,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2005.07.004, 2006.
Kumar, S. V., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Santanello, J., Harrison, K., Liu, Y., and Shaw, M.: Land surface Verification Toolkit (LVT) – a generalized framework for land surface model evaluation, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 869–886, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-869-2012, 2012.
Kumar, S. V., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Mocko, D., and Tian, Y.: Multiscale
Evaluation of the Improvements in Surface Snow Simulation through Terrain
Adjustments to Radiation, J. Hydrometeorol., 14, 220–232,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-046.1, 2013.
Ma, Z., Xu, J., Zhu, S., Yang, J., Tang, G., Yang, Y., Shi, Z., and Hong, Y.: AIMERG: a new Asian precipitation dataset (0.1∘/half-hourly, 2000–2015) by calibrating the GPM-era IMERG at a daily scale using APHRODITE, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1525–1544, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1525-2020, 2020.
Manz, B., Páez-Bimos, S., Horna, N., Buytaert, W., Ochoa-Tocachi, B.,
Lavado-Casimiro, W., and Willems, B.: Comparative Ground Validation of IMERG
and TMPA at Variable Spatiotemporal Scales in the Tropical Andes, J.
Hydrometeorol., 18, 2469–2489, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0277.1,
2017.
McNally, A.: GES DISC Dataset: FLDAS Noah Land Surface
Model L4 Global Monthly 0.1 0.1 degree (MERRA-2 and CHIRPS) (FLDAS_NOAH01_C_GL_M 001), NASA [data set],
https://doi.org/10.5067/5NHC22T9375G, 2018.
McNally, A., Husak, G. J., Brown, M., Carroll, M., Funk, C., Yatheendradas,
S., Arsenault, K., Peters-Lidard, C., and Verdin, J. P.: Calculating Crop
Water Requirement Satisfaction in the West Africa Sahel with Remotely Sensed
Soil Moisture, J. Hydrometeorol., 16, 295–305,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-14-0049.1, 2015.
McNally, A., Shukla, S., Arsenault, K. R., Wang, S., Peters-Lidard, C. D.,
and Verdin, J. P.: Evaluating ESA CCI soil moisture in East Africa,
Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs., 48,
96–109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.01.001, 2016.
McNally, A., Arsenault, K., Kumar, S., Shukla, S., Peterson, P., Wang, S.,
Funk, C., Peters-lidard, C. D., and Verdin, J. P.: A land data assimilation
system for sub-Saharan Africa food and water security applications,
Scientific Data, 4, 170012, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.12, 2017.
McNally, A., McCartney, S., Ruane, A. C., Mladenova, I. E., Whitcraft, A.
K., Becker-Reshef, I., Bolten, J. D., Peters-Lidard, C. D., Rosenzweig, C.,
and Uz, S. S.: Hydrologic and Agricultural Earth Observations and Modeling
for the Water-Food Nexus, Front. Environ. Sci., 7, 23,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00023, 2019.
Miller, J., Barlage, M., Zeng, X., Wei, H., Mitchell, K., and Tarpley, D.:
Sensitivity of the NCEP/Noah land surface model to the MODIS green
vegetation fraction data set, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L13404,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026636, 2006.
Molteni, F., Buizza, R., Palmer, T. N., and Petroliagis, T.: The ECMWF
Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
122, 73–119, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712252905, 1996.
NASA Earth Observatory: Record Low Snowpack in Afghanistan, NASA Earth
Observatory, https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/91851/record-low-snowpack-in-afghanistan (last access: 28 June 2022), 2018.
NASA JPL: NASA Shuttle Radar Topography Mission Global 30 arc second, NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC, NASA
EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC [data
set], https://doi.org/10.5067/MEaSUREs/SRTM/SRTMGL30.002, 2013.
Nazemosadat, M. J. and Ghaedamini, H.: On the Relationships between the
Madden–Julian Oscillation and Precipitation Variability in Southern Iran
and the Arabian Peninsula: Atmospheric Circulation Analysis, J. Climate, 23, 887–904,
https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2141.1, 2010.
NCAR Research Applications Library: UNIFIED NOAH LSM,
https://ral.ucar.edu/solutions/products/unified-noah-lsm, last access: 12
November 2021.
Niu, G.-Y., Yang, Z.-L., Mitchell, K. E., Chen, F., Ek, M. B., Barlage, M.,
Kumar, A., Manning, K., Niyogi, D., Rosero, E., Tewari, M., and Xia, Y.: The
community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options
(Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale
measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12109, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015139,
2011.
NOAA: September ENSO update: La Niña Watch!, ENSO Blog, https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/september-enso-update-la-nina-watch (last access: 28 June 2022), 2017.
NOAA CPC: ENSO Cold & Warm Episodes by Season,
https://origin.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensostuff/ONI_v5.php, last access: 29 July 2021.
Oki, T. and Kanae, S.: Global Hydrological Cycles and World Water Resources,
Science, 313, 1068–1072, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128845, 2006.
Pervez, S., McNally, A., Arsenault, K., Budde, M., and Rowland, J.:
Vegetation Monitoring Optimization With Normalized Difference Vegetation
Index and Evapotranspiration Using Remote Sensing Measurements and Land
Surface Models Over East Africa, Frontiers in Climate, 3, 589981,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2021.589981, 2021.
Peters-Lidard, C. D., Houser, P. R., Tian, Y., Kumar, S. V., Geiger, J.,
Olden, S., Lighty, L., Doty, B., Dirmeyer, P., Adams, J., Mitchell, K.,
Wood, E. F., and Sheffield, J.: High-performance Earth system modeling with
NASA/GSFC's Land Information System, Innovations Syst. Softw. Eng., 3,
157–165, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-007-0028-x, 2007.
Qamer, F. M., Tadesse, T., Matin, M., Ellenburg, W. L., and Zaitchik, B.:
Earth Observation and Climate Services for Food Security and Agricultural
Decision Making in South and Southeast Asia, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100,
ES171–ES174, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0342.1, 2019.
Rana, S., Renwick, J., McGregor, J., and Singh, A.: Seasonal Prediction of
Winter Precipitation Anomalies over Central Southwest Asia: A Canonical
Correlation Analysis Approach, J. Climate, 31, 727–741,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0131.1, 2018.
Reynolds, C. A., Jackson, T. J., and Rawls, W. J.: Estimating soil
water-holding capacities by linking the Food and Agriculture Organization
Soil map of the world with global pedon databases and continuous
pedotransfer functions, Water Resour. Res., 36, 3653–3662,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900130, 2000.
Sarmiento, D. P., Slinski, K., McNally, A., Funk, C., Peterson, P., and
Peters-Lidard, C. D.: Daily precipitation frequency distributions impacts on
land-surface simulations of CONUS, Front. Water, 3, 640736,
https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.640736, 2021.
Schiemann, R., Lüthi, D., Vidale, P. L., and Schär, C.: The
precipitation climate of Central Asia – intercomparison of observational and
numerical data sources in a remote semiarid region, Int. J. Climatol., 28, 295–314, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1532, 2008.
Schneider, U., Finger, P., Meyer-Christoffer, A., Rustemeier, E., Ziese, M.,
and Becker, A.: Evaluating the Hydrological Cycle over Land Using the
Newly-Corrected Precipitation Climatology from the Global Precipitation
Climatology Centre (GPCC), Atmosphere, 8, 52, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8030052,
2017.
Senay, G. B., Bohms, S., Singh, R. K., Gowda, P. H., Velpuri, N. M., Alemu,
H., and Verdin, J. P.: Operational Evapotranspiration Mapping Using Remote
Sensing and Weather Datasets: A New Parameterization for the SSEB Approach,
J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 49, 577–591, https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12057,
2013.
Shukla, S., Arsenault, K. R., Hazra, A., Peters-Lidard, C., Koster, R. D., Davenport, F., Magadzire, T., Funk, C., Kumar, S., McNally, A., Getirana, A., Husak, G., Zaitchik, B., Verdin, J., Nsadisa, F. D., and Becker-Reshef, I.: Improving early warning of drought-driven food insecurity in southern Africa using operational hydrological monitoring and forecasting products, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1187–1201, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1187-2020, 2020.
Shukla, S., Landsfeld, M., Anthony, M., Budde, M., Husak, G. J., Rowland,
J., and Funk, C.: Enhancing the Application of Earth Observations for
Improved Environmental Decision-Making Using the Early Warning eXplorer
(EWX), Frontiers in Climate, 2, 583509,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2020.583509, 2021.
Tabar, M., Gluck, J., Goyal, A., Jiang, F., Morr, D., Kehs, A., Lee, D.,
Hughes, D. P., and Yadav, A.: A PLAN for Tackling the Locust Crisis in East
Africa: Harnessing Spatiotemporal Deep Models for Locust Movement
Forecasting, in: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge
Discovery & Data Mining, New York, NY, USA, 14–18 August, 2021 3595–3604,
https://doi.org/10.1145/3447548.3467184, 2021.
Tan, J., Petersen, W. A., and Tokay, A.: A Novel Approach to Identify
Sources of Errors in IMERG for GPM Ground Validation, J.
Hydrometeorol., 17, 2477–2491, https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-16-0079.1,
2016.
UNICEF: 500,000 children affected by drought in Afghanistan – UNICEF, https://www.unicef.org/press-releases/500000-children-affected-drought-afghanistan-unicef (last access: 28 June 2022),
2018.
USGS: Knowledge Base,
https://earlywarning.usgs.gov/fews/searchkb/Asia/Central Asia/Afghanistan,
last access: 12 November 2021.
Vincent, K., Daly, M., Scannell, C., and Leathes, B.: What can climate
services learn from theory and practice of co-production?, Climate Services,
12, 48–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2018.11.001, 2018.
Xie, P. and Arkin, P. A.: Analyses of Global Monthly Precipitation Using
Gauge Observations, Satellite Estimates, and Numerical Model Predictions,
J. Climate, 9, 840–858,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<0840:AOGMPU>2.0.CO;2, 1996.
Yatagai, A., Kamiguchi, K., Arakawa, O., Hamada, A., Yasutomi, N., and
Kitoh, A.: APHRODITE: Constructing a Long-Term Daily Gridded Precipitation
Dataset for Asia Based on a Dense Network of Rain Gauges, B. Am. Meteorol.
Soc., 93, 1401–1415, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00122.1, 2012.
Yoon, Y., Kumar, S. V., Forman, B. A., Zaitchik, B. F., Kwon, Y., Qian, Y.,
Rupper, S., Maggioni, V., Houser, P., Kirschbaum, D., Richey, A., Arendt,
A., Mocko, D., Jacob, J., Bhanja, S., and Mukherjee, A.: Evaluating the
Uncertainty of Terrestrial Water Budget Components Over High Mountain Asia,
Frontiers in Earth Science, 7, 120,
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00120, 2019.
Short summary
The Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Land Data Assimilation System (FLDAS) global and Central Asia data streams described here generate routine estimates of snow, soil moisture, runoff, and other variables useful for tracking water availability. These data are hosted by NASA and USGS data portals for public use.
The Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWS NET) Land Data Assimilation System (FLDAS) global...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint