126 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. High-Degree Models of the Earth’s Gravity Field: History of Development, Assessment of Prospects and Resolution P. Mikhailov et al. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0747923921040083
2. Analysis and Mitigation of Biases in Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Balance Trend Estimates From GRACE Mascon Products J. Ran et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020880
3. Quality assessment of global gravity field models in the Antarctic region based on airborne gravity data X. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2025.08.001
4. Impact of the combination and replacement of SLR-based low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE solutions F. Gałdyn & K. Sośnica https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-024-00608-z
5. Precise orbit determination of Spire nano satellites D. Arnold et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.10.012
6. The lithospheric structure of Greenland from a stepwise forward and inverse modelling approach A. Wansing et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae183
7. Long-term ice mass changes in Greenland and Antarctica derived from satellite laser ranging F. Gałdyn et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2024.113994
8. Local Enhancement of Marine Gravity Field over the Spratly Islands by Combining Satellite SAR Altimeter-Derived Gravity Data Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030474
9. On vectorial integer bootstrapping implementations in the estimation of satellite orbits and clocks based on small global networks L. Massarweh et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.09.023
10. High-resolution regional gravity field modeling to connect the local vertical systems in South America to the IHRF G. Guimarães et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-025-02226-5
11. Local quasigeoid modeling at Argentinean stations of the International Height Reference Frame (IHRF) A. Gómez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-02018-5
12. Investigating the relationship between accuracy and orders of global geopotential models over GNSS/Levelling stations: a case study of Egypt G. Dawod et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2025-0061
13. Impact of incorporating Spire CubeSat GPS observations in a global GPS network solution C. Kobel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.04.015
14. Performance and application of the Chinese satellite-to-satellite tracking gravimetry system Y. Xiao et al. https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2022-1057
15. Refinement of Mean Dynamic Topography Over Island Areas Using Airborne Gravimetry and Satellite Altimetry Data in the Northwestern South China Sea Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB021805
16. Evaluation and homogenization of a marine gravity database from shipborne and satellite altimetry-derived gravity data over the coastal region of Nigeria M. Bako & J. Kusche https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2024-0059
17. An Investigation into the Utilization of The Mean Dynamic Topography Model in Sumatra Region as A Potential Alternative Physical Height Reference D. Anggreni Sarsito et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1624/1/012019
18. Evaluating the Signal Contribution of the DTU21MSS on Coastal Mean Dynamic Topography and Geostrophic Current Modeling: A Case Study in the African–European Region H. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16244714
19. Precise orbit determination for TOPEX/Poseidon, Jasons 1,2,3 and Sentinel-6A and the std2400 series of orbits F. Lemoine et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.12.112
20. Impacts of SLR Ground Station Geographic Distribution on Time‐Variable Gravity Recovery E. Tucker et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB026638
21. Long-term analysis of Sentinel-6A orbit determination: Insights from three years of flight data D. Calliess et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.06.043
22. Performance assessment of multiple LRI1B products for GRACE-FO time-variable gravity field recovery J. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2026.05.030
23. Data-driven multi-step self-de-aliasing approach for GRACE and GRACE-FO data processing P. Abrykosov et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac340
24. GRACE Follow‐On Accelerometer Data Recovery S. Behzadpour et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB021297
25. Project to Implement an International Gravimetric Datum in Western Ukraine J. WALO https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v30i3.05
26. Assessment of latest global gravity field models by GNSS/Levelling Geoid N. YILMAZ https://doi.org/10.26833/ijeg.1070042
27. Assessments of recently released global geopotential models along the Red Sea with shipborne gravity data M. Abdallah et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2022.01.005
28. Regional assessment of high-degree combined global gravity field model for geoid modelling over Nigeria M. Bako https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2025-0039
29. Improvement of GOCE-Based Global Geopotential Models for Gravimetric Geoid Modeling in Turkey M. Isik et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12120432
30. Choice of observation type affects Bayesian calibration of Greenland Ice Sheet model simulations D. Felikson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-4661-2023
31. Residual Patterns in GRACE Follow-On Laser Ranging Interferometry Post-Fit Range Rate Residuals M. Duwe et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.035
32. A Study of Solar Radiation Pressure Model in BDS-3 Precise Orbit Determination L. Peng-jie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chinastron.2023.11.001
33. Precise orbit determination for low Earth orbit satellites using GNSS: Observations, models, and methods X. Mao et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42064-023-0195-z
34. Regional Gravity Model of Greece Based on Satellite, Marine and Terrestrial Data S. Dilalos & J. Alexopoulos https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-023-03285-z
35. Modified Bott-Parker method for gravimetric Moho modeling J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2024-0382.1
36. A refined acceleration approach for deriving monthly gravity field solutions from K-band range-acceleration observations X. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae466
37. Radial surface currents from space: An opportunity for mean dynamic topography estimation? C. Neyers & J. Brockmann https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.05.041
38. Tracking the spatial patterns and thematic dynamics of GRACE satellite application over the last 20 years (2002–2022) H. Zhang https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1392359
39. Uncertainties associated with integral-based solutions to geodetic boundary-value problems P. Novák et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01858-x
40. Addressing Inaccurate Phase Center Offsets in Precise Orbit Determination for Agile Satellite Missions K. Gutsche et al. https://doi.org/10.33012/navi.671
41. High-resolution temporal gravity field data products: Monthly mass grids and spherical harmonics from 1994 to 2021 M. Uz et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02887-5
42. New global mean dynamic topography CNES-CLS-22 combining drifters, hydrography profiles and high frequency radar data S. Jousset et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-2285-2026
43. High-Resolution Quasi-Geoid Recovery Over Coastal Zone by Using Airborne Gravity Gradient Data Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3588586
44. The Influence of Bathymetry on Regional Marine Geoid Modeling in Northern Europe S. Varbla https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10060793
45. Variation in thermal structure with crustal thickness for the crust beneath the Peninsular Malaysia U. Yahaya Yaro & I. Ahmad Abir https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaesx.2023.100146
46. Potential of cold-atom airborne gravimetry to improve coastal gravity field and quasigeoid modelling D. Vu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01839-0
47. Software, services and open source software for solving geodynamic problems I. Dorogova & K. Dukhovnikov https://doi.org/10.33764/2618-981X-2022-1-138-145
48. Constellation design and performance of future quantum satellite gravity missions P. Zingerle et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-02034-3
49. Contribution Analysis of GOCE SGG Observations at Different Orbital Altitudes to Tongji-GMMG2021S Gravity Field Model J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3441554
50. Precise LEO orbit determination using regional PPP-B2b augmentation services H. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2026.121252
51. Combination of different observation types through a multi-resolution representation of the regional gravity field using the pyramid algorithm and parameter estimation Q. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01670-5
52. Geoid Studies in Two Test Areas in Greece Using Different Geopotential Models towards the Estimation of a Reference Geopotential Value V. Grigoriadis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174282
53. Observation of the Earth gravity field from space: from the beginnings till future missions based on quantum physics F. Migliaccio et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40766-025-00076-1
54. GCL-Mascon2024: a novel satellite gravimetry mascon solution using the short-arc approach Z. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-4253-2025
55. An improved Slepian method for mitigating signal leakage in Greenland ice sheet mass variation estimation Z. Gong et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-02022-9
56. A New Model of Quasigeoid for the Baltic Sea Area A. Lyszkowicz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13132580
57. The Impact of Surface Loading on GNSS Stations in Africa S. Usifoh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-024-03480-6
58. Assessment of the Added Value of the GOCE GPS Data on the GRACE Monthly Gravity Field Solutions X. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16091586
59. Contribution of advanced edge-detection methods of potential field data in the tectono-structural study of the southwestern part of Cameroon A. Nzeuga et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.970614
60. High-resolution regional gravity field modeling in data-challenging regions for the realization of geopotential-based height systems Q. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-024-01981-1
61. Impact of assimilation of absolute dynamic topography on Arctic Ocean circulation G. Smith et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1390781
62. Using High–Low Flight Gravity Data to Improve Geoid Model Precision: A Case Study in U.S. Virgin Islands (July 2021) X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3129374
63. COST-G gravity field models for precise orbit determination of Low Earth Orbiting Satellites H. Peter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.005
64. Moving Geoid Gradient Method for High-Precision and High-Resolution Gravity Recovery From SWOT Wide-Swath Data C. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3563949
65. What controls structural variations along the Zagros Collision Zone? Insights from geophysical observations and thermo-mechanical modelling M. Tesauro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2024.06.009
66. Orbital relativistic correction resulting from the Earth’s oblateness term K. Sośnica & F. Gałdyn https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01973-3
67. Improved precise kinematic LEO orbits based on the raw observation approach B. Suesser-Rechberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2022.03.014
68. Coastal bathymetry in central Dronning Maud Land controls ice shelf stability H. Eisermann et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51882-2
69. Optimal Global Gravity Field Model for Calculation of local Gravity and Geoid in Indonesia D. Ramdani et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1418/1/012021
70. Analysis of the IGS contribution to ITRF2020 P. Rebischung et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01870-1
71. Precise orbit and baseline determination with dual GPS antennas for the SuperView Neo-2 satellite X. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-025-01842-8
72. Iterative approaches for regional Moho determination using on-orbit gravity gradients: a case study in Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and its near zone W. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad281
73. A multi-disciplinary geophysical approach reveals a Paleoproterozoic cryptic suture in the Amazon Craton – Implications for Proterozoic Supercontinent reconstructions R. Correa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2023.107249
74. Combined effects of terrain corrections and deterministic modifiers on the Stokes-Helmert geoid over sophisticated topography R. Abbak et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-025-00460-7
75. Impact of Earth’s Mean Time-Variable Gravity Field Models on Precise Orbits of Altimetry Satellites S. Rudenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-026-09942-x
76. Performance evaluation of high/ultra-high-degree global geopotential models over Vietnam using GNSS/leveling data H. Pham et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2023.03.002
77. Antarctic Sedimentary Basins and Their Influence on Ice‐Sheet Dynamics A. Aitken et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021RG000767
78. A Direct Approach for Local Quasi-Geoid Modeling Based on Spherical Radial Basis Functions Using a Noisy Satellite-Only Global Gravity Field Model H. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16101731
79. Improved gravity field estimation by incorporating the Tiangong Space Station and next-generation CAI satellite gravity mission R. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2024.06.004
80. POD performance of LEO satellites with Galileo high accuracy service (HAS) of initial service phase S. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.12.062
81. On precise orbit determination based on DORIS, GPS and SLR using Sentinel-3A/B and -6A and subsequent reference frame determination based on DORIS-only P. Schreiner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.002
82. Fusion of satellite-derived gravity and land gravity bouguer anomalies for improved regional geological mapping: Case studies in bushveld (South Africa) and Talmest (Morocco) B. Roman et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2026.106163
83. An Improved Acceleration Approach by Utilizing K-Band Range Rate Observations Z. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15215260
84. Earth’s Time-Variable Gravity from GRACE Follow-On K-Band Range-Rates and Pseudo-Observed Orbits I. Koch et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091766
85. GEORB: Release for precise orbit determination of low Earth orbiters and satellite gravity missions T. Papanikolaou https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpa.2023.100502
86. Assessing the performance of multi-GNSS precise point positioning technique on the geoid model validation M. Simav et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396265.2023.2167920
87. Impacts of FES2022 and AOD1B RL07 Background Models on KBR- and LRI-Based GRACE-FO Monthly Gravity Field Estimations Z. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2026.3651751
88. A review of the geophysical knowledge of the Borborema Province, NE-Brazil, and tectonic implications R. Gusmão de Oliveira et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2023.104360
89. GRACE Follow-On accelerometer data recovery by high-precision environment modelling M. Huckfeldt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.068
90. Precise dynamic orbit determination based on SLR for geodetic and upper atmosphere applications B. Suesser-Rechberger et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2026.05.046
91. Risk assessment and adaptation technologies for island biodiversity conservation in China under climate change Y. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accre.2025.06.007
92. A Signal-to-Noise Ratio Filter by Incorporating Spectral Characteristics of Temporal Gravity Field Signals and Varying GRACE Observation Conditions J. Xuan et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3637084
93. THE GEOID AND QUASIGEOID OF SÃO PAULO STATE USING THE UPDATED GRAVIMETRIC DATA AND THE 2018 BVRF V. Silva et al. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-2170-2020-0061
94. Establishing a Marine Gravity Database around Egypt from Satellite Altimetry-Derived and Shipborne Gravity Data A. Zaki et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490419.2021.2020185
95. New insights into the crustal structures of the Arabian Plate and surrounding plates unveiled from the crustal thickness model and its implications for geodynamics C. Chisenga et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2024.106431
96. Mapping the Thermal Structure of the Amazon Craton to Constrain the Tectonic Domains R. Correa et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB023025
97. Assessment of geoid models for geopotential values determination in Mexico'S continuous monitoring network A. Vidal-Vega et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2024.105192
98. Spectrally Consistent Mean Dynamic Topography by Combining Mean Sea Surface and Global Geopotential Model Through a Least Squares-Based Approach H. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.795935
99. Global geopotential models evaluation based on terrestrial gravity data over Ethiopia E. Alemu https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0051
100. Analysis of different combinations of gravity data types in gravimetric geoid determination over Bali Z. Udama et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2023-0042
101. Crustal dynamics study of the unstable North Egyptian shelf through satellite gravity data and inverse/forward modeling M. Haggag et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-025-12322-0
102. Least squares collocation method in Moho depth determination in Iran using gravity gradient data H. Heydarizadeh Shali et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24596
103. Satellite altimetry and operational oceanography: from Jason-1 to SWOT P. Le Traon et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-21-1329-2025
104. An Improved Average Acceleration Approach of Modelling Earth Gravity Field Based on K-Band Range-Rate Observations X. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16173172
105. Total water level prediction at continental scale: Coastal ocean L. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2024.102451
106. Improving understanding of terrestrial water storage changes over China using the high-accuracy Tongji-Grace2022 model T. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.103005
107. Evaluating long-term water storage trends in small catchments and aquifers from a joint inversion of 20 years of GRACE/GRACE-FO mission data A. Kvas et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad468
108. Contribution analysis of the addition of laser ranging interferometry on GRACE-FO gravity field estimation under different accelerometer calibration schemes Q. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.10.038
109. A Science Gateway for the Repeatable Analysis of Machine Learning Predicted Gravity Anomalies J. Arndt et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2024.3441322
110. Finite volume method: a good match to airborne gravimetry? X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01922-6
111. Reprocessed precise science orbits and gravity field recovery for the entire GOCE mission D. Arnold et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01752-y
112. Enhanced Accuracy in Jump Power Estimation Using Photoelectric Cell System and GRS80 Location-Specific Gravitational Acceleration J. González-Montesinos et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165163
113. Tailored accelerometer calibration by POD for thermospheric density retrieval with GRACE and GRACE-FO F. Wöske et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.09.021
114. Tectonic and metallogenic implications of a metasomatized mantle inferred from magnetotellurics and gravity data: An example of Tapajós Mineral Province, Amazon Craton R. Correa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2023.230099
115. Impacts of temporal resolution of atmospheric de-aliasing products on gravity field estimation Y. Bai et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae125
116. Demonstrating the potential for the reduction of temporal aliasing through tailored stochastic modelling of non-tidal atmosphere and ocean model uncertainties in closed-loop simulations P. Abrykosov & R. Pail https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-025-01980-4
117. Simulation of a Future SLR Satellite to Improve Low‐Degree Gravity Estimates E. Tucker et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025743
118. Improved undifferenced ambiguity resolution for LEO precise orbit determination G. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.035
119. Non-Linear Global Ice and Water Storage Changes from a Combination of Satellite Laser Ranging and GRACE Data F. Gałdyn et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18020313
120. Moho Inversion by Gravity Anomalies in the South China Sea: Updates and Improved Iteration of the Parker‐Oldenburg Algorithm W. Rao et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002794
121. Stabilized mascon solutions through combinations of GRACE and SLR normal equations M. Croteau et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaf016
122. 3D crustal density modeling of Egypt using GOCE satellite gravity data and seismic integration M. Sayed et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eqs.2024.09.003
123. Combined monthly GRACE-FO gravity fields for a Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product U. Meyer et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggad437
124. An Attention-GraphSAGE Algorithm for Marine Gravity Anomaly Inversion Using Denoised Photon Point Cloud Data of ICESat-2 G. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3631519
125. Marine Quasi-Geoid Enhancement From SWOT Wide-Swath Data and Its Mapping of Mean Dynamic Topography Over Island Areas Y. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2025.3592243
126. Calibration of the GOCE accelerometers by GPS- and SLR-based precise orbit determination P. Visser et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-026-02046-9