84 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. High-Degree Models of the Earth’s Gravity Field: History of Development, Assessment of Prospects and Resolution P. Mikhailov et al. 10.3103/S0747923921040083
2. Analysis and Mitigation of Biases in Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Balance Trend Estimates From GRACE Mascon Products J. Ran et al. 10.1029/2020JB020880
3. Iterative approaches for regional Moho determination using on-orbit gravity gradients: a case study in Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and its near zone W. Li et al. 10.1093/gji/ggad281
4. A multi-disciplinary geophysical approach reveals a Paleoproterozoic cryptic suture in the Amazon Craton – Implications for Proterozoic Supercontinent reconstructions R. Correa et al. 10.1016/j.precamres.2023.107249
5. Impact of the combination and replacement of SLR-based low-degree gravity field coefficients in GRACE solutions F. Gałdyn & K. Sośnica 10.1186/s40645-024-00608-z
6. Performance evaluation of high/ultra-high-degree global geopotential models over Vietnam using GNSS/leveling data H. Pham et al. 10.1016/j.geog.2023.03.002
7. Antarctic Sedimentary Basins and Their Influence on Ice‐Sheet Dynamics A. Aitken et al. 10.1029/2021RG000767
8. A Direct Approach for Local Quasi-Geoid Modeling Based on Spherical Radial Basis Functions Using a Noisy Satellite-Only Global Gravity Field Model H. Yu et al. 10.3390/rs16101731
9. Improved gravity field estimation by incorporating the Tiangong Space Station and next-generation CAI satellite gravity mission R. Zhao et al. 10.1016/j.geog.2024.06.004
10. On precise orbit determination based on DORIS, GPS and SLR using Sentinel-3A/B and -6A and subsequent reference frame determination based on DORIS-only P. Schreiner et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.002
11. Precise orbit determination of Spire nano satellites D. Arnold et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2023.10.012
12. The lithospheric structure of Greenland from a stepwise forward and inverse modelling approach A. Wansing et al. 10.1093/gji/ggae183
13. Long-term ice mass changes in Greenland and Antarctica derived from satellite laser ranging F. Gałdyn et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2024.113994
14. Local Enhancement of Marine Gravity Field over the Spratly Islands by Combining Satellite SAR Altimeter-Derived Gravity Data Y. Wu et al. 10.3390/rs14030474
15. On vectorial integer bootstrapping implementations in the estimation of satellite orbits and clocks based on small global networks L. Massarweh et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2021.09.023
16. Impact of incorporating Spire CubeSat GPS observations in a global GPS network solution C. Kobel et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2024.04.015
17. Performance and application of the Chinese satellite-to-satellite tracking gravimetry system Y. Xiao et al. 10.1360/TB-2022-1057
18. An Improved Acceleration Approach by Utilizing K-Band Range Rate Observations Z. Shen et al. 10.3390/rs15215260
19. Earth’s Time-Variable Gravity from GRACE Follow-On K-Band Range-Rates and Pseudo-Observed Orbits I. Koch et al. 10.3390/rs13091766
20. Refinement of Mean Dynamic Topography Over Island Areas Using Airborne Gravimetry and Satellite Altimetry Data in the Northwestern South China Sea Y. Wu et al. 10.1029/2021JB021805
21. GEORB: Release for precise orbit determination of low Earth orbiters and satellite gravity missions T. Papanikolaou 10.1016/j.simpa.2023.100502
22. Assessing the performance of multi-GNSS precise point positioning technique on the geoid model validation M. Simav et al. 10.1080/00396265.2023.2167920
23. A review of the geophysical knowledge of the Borborema Province, NE-Brazil, and tectonic implications R. Gusmão de Oliveira et al. 10.1016/j.jsames.2023.104360
24. GRACE Follow-On accelerometer data recovery by high-precision environment modelling M. Huckfeldt et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.068
25. Impacts of SLR Ground Station Geographic Distribution on Time‐Variable Gravity Recovery E. Tucker et al. 10.1029/2023JB026638
26. Long-term analysis of Sentinel-6A orbit determination: Insights from three years of flight data D. Calliess et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2024.06.043
27. Data-driven multi-step self-de-aliasing approach for GRACE and GRACE-FO data processing P. Abrykosov et al. 10.1093/gji/ggac340
28. GRACE Follow‐On Accelerometer Data Recovery S. Behzadpour et al. 10.1029/2020JB021297
29. Assessment of latest global gravity field models by GNSS/Levelling Geoid N. YILMAZ 10.26833/ijeg.1070042
30. Assessments of recently released global geopotential models along the Red Sea with shipborne gravity data M. Abdallah et al. 10.1016/j.ejrs.2022.01.005
31. Improvement of GOCE-Based Global Geopotential Models for Gravimetric Geoid Modeling in Turkey M. Isik et al. 10.3390/geosciences12120432
32. THE GEOID AND QUASIGEOID OF SÃO PAULO STATE USING THE UPDATED GRAVIMETRIC DATA AND THE 2018 BVRF V. Silva et al. 10.1590/1982-2170-2020-0061
33. Choice of observation type affects Bayesian calibration of Greenland Ice Sheet model simulations D. Felikson et al. 10.5194/tc-17-4661-2023
34. Establishing a Marine Gravity Database around Egypt from Satellite Altimetry-Derived and Shipborne Gravity Data A. Zaki et al. 10.1080/01490419.2021.2020185
35. Residual Patterns in GRACE Follow-On Laser Ranging Interferometry Post-Fit Range Rate Residuals M. Duwe et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.035
36. Mapping the Thermal Structure of the Amazon Craton to Constrain the Tectonic Domains R. Correa et al. 10.1029/2021JB023025
37. A Study of Solar Radiation Pressure Model in BDS-3 Precise Orbit Determination L. Peng-jie et al. 10.1016/j.chinastron.2023.11.001
38. Precise orbit determination for low Earth orbit satellites using GNSS: Observations, models, and methods X. Mao et al. 10.1007/s42064-023-0195-z
39. Spectrally Consistent Mean Dynamic Topography by Combining Mean Sea Surface and Global Geopotential Model Through a Least Squares-Based Approach H. Shi et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.795935
40. Regional Gravity Model of Greece Based on Satellite, Marine and Terrestrial Data S. Dilalos & J. Alexopoulos 10.1007/s00024-023-03285-z
41. Global geopotential models evaluation based on terrestrial gravity data over Ethiopia E. Alemu 10.1515/jag-2022-0051
42. Analysis of different combinations of gravity data types in gravimetric geoid determination over Bali Z. Udama et al. 10.1515/jag-2023-0042
43. Radial surface currents from space: An opportunity for mean dynamic topography estimation? C. Neyers & J. Brockmann 10.1016/j.asr.2024.05.041
44. Tracking the spatial patterns and thematic dynamics of GRACE satellite application over the last 20 years (2002–2022) H. Zhang 10.3389/feart.2024.1392359
45. Uncertainties associated with integral-based solutions to geodetic boundary-value problems P. Novák et al. 10.1007/s00190-024-01858-x
46. High-resolution temporal gravity field data products: Monthly mass grids and spherical harmonics from 1994 to 2021 M. Uz et al. 10.1038/s41597-023-02887-5
47. The Influence of Bathymetry on Regional Marine Geoid Modeling in Northern Europe S. Varbla 10.3390/jmse10060793
48. Variation in thermal structure with crustal thickness for the crust beneath the Peninsular Malaysia U. Yahaya Yaro & I. Ahmad Abir 10.1016/j.jaesx.2023.100146
49. Potential of cold-atom airborne gravimetry to improve coastal gravity field and quasigeoid modelling D. Vu et al. 10.1007/s00190-024-01839-0
50. Software, services and open source software for solving geodynamic problems I. Dorogova & K. Dukhovnikov 10.33764/2618-981X-2022-1-138-145
51. Constellation design and performance of future quantum satellite gravity missions P. Zingerle et al. 10.1186/s40623-024-02034-3
52. Least squares collocation method in Moho depth determination in Iran using gravity gradient data H. Heydarizadeh Shali et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24596
53. Contribution Analysis of GOCE SGG Observations at Different Orbital Altitudes to Tongji-GMMG2021S Gravity Field Model J. Chen et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3441554
54. An Improved Average Acceleration Approach of Modelling Earth Gravity Field Based on K-Band Range-Rate Observations X. Tan et al. 10.3390/rs16173172
55. Evaluating long-term water storage trends in small catchments and aquifers from a joint inversion of 20 years of GRACE/GRACE-FO mission data A. Kvas et al. 10.1093/gji/ggad468
56. Combination of different observation types through a multi-resolution representation of the regional gravity field using the pyramid algorithm and parameter estimation Q. Liu et al. 10.1007/s00190-022-01670-5
57. A Science Gateway for the Repeatable Analysis of Machine Learning Predicted Gravity Anomalies J. Arndt et al. 10.1109/LGRS.2024.3441322
58. Geoid Studies in Two Test Areas in Greece Using Different Geopotential Models towards the Estimation of a Reference Geopotential Value V. Grigoriadis et al. 10.3390/rs15174282
59. Reprocessed precise science orbits and gravity field recovery for the entire GOCE mission D. Arnold et al. 10.1007/s00190-023-01752-y
60. Tectonic and metallogenic implications of a metasomatized mantle inferred from magnetotellurics and gravity data: An example of Tapajós Mineral Province, Amazon Craton R. Correa et al. 10.1016/j.tecto.2023.230099
61. Impacts of temporal resolution of atmospheric de-aliasing products on gravity field estimation Y. Bai et al. 10.1093/gji/ggae125
62. A New Model of Quasigeoid for the Baltic Sea Area A. Lyszkowicz et al. 10.3390/rs13132580
63. The Impact of Surface Loading on GNSS Stations in Africa S. Usifoh et al. 10.1007/s00024-024-03480-6
64. Assessment of the Added Value of the GOCE GPS Data on the GRACE Monthly Gravity Field Solutions X. Guo et al. 10.3390/rs16091586
65. Simulation of a Future SLR Satellite to Improve Low‐Degree Gravity Estimates E. Tucker et al. 10.1029/2022JB025743
66. Contribution of advanced edge-detection methods of potential field data in the tectono-structural study of the southwestern part of Cameroon A. Nzeuga et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.970614
67. High-resolution regional gravity field modeling in data-challenging regions for the realization of geopotential-based height systems Q. Liu et al. 10.1186/s40623-024-01981-1
68. Impact of assimilation of absolute dynamic topography on Arctic Ocean circulation G. Smith et al. 10.3389/fmars.2024.1390781
69. Using High–Low Flight Gravity Data to Improve Geoid Model Precision: A Case Study in U.S. Virgin Islands (July 2021) X. Li et al. 10.1109/LGRS.2021.3129374
70. COST-G gravity field models for precise orbit determination of Low Earth Orbiting Satellites H. Peter et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2022.04.005
71. Improved undifferenced ambiguity resolution for LEO precise orbit determination G. Gao et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2023.04.035
72. Moho Inversion by Gravity Anomalies in the South China Sea: Updates and Improved Iteration of the Parker‐Oldenburg Algorithm W. Rao et al. 10.1029/2022EA002794
73. What controls structural variations along the Zagros Collision Zone? Insights from geophysical observations and thermo-mechanical modelling M. Tesauro et al. 10.1016/j.gr.2024.06.009
74. Improved precise kinematic LEO orbits based on the raw observation approach B. Suesser-Rechberger et al. 10.1016/j.asr.2022.03.014
75. Combined monthly GRACE-FO gravity fields for a Global Gravity-based Groundwater Product U. Meyer et al. 10.1093/gji/ggad437
76. Coastal bathymetry in central Dronning Maud Land controls ice shelf stability H. Eisermann et al. 10.1038/s41598-024-51882-2
77. Analysis of the IGS contribution to ITRF2020 P. Rebischung et al. 10.1007/s00190-024-01870-1
78. Modeling the Greenland Ice Sheet's Committed Contribution to Sea Level During the 21st Century I. Nias et al. 10.1029/2022JF006914
79. Temporal Gravity Signals in Reprocessed GOCE Gravitational Gradients B. Heller et al. 10.3390/rs12213483
80. High‐Spatial‐Resolution Mass Rates From GRACE and GRACE‐FO: Global and Ice Sheet Analyses B. Loomis et al. 10.1029/2021JB023024
81. Geodetic SAR for Height System Unification and Sea Level Research—Observation Concept and Preliminary Results in the Baltic Sea T. Gruber et al. 10.3390/rs12223747
82. A high-resolution gravimetric geoid model for Kingdom of Saudi Arabia A. Zaki & S. Mogren 10.1080/00396265.2021.1944544
83. Moho depth estimation of northern of East African Rift System E. Alemu 10.1515/jag-2023-0003
84. Analysis of high-resolution global gravity field models for the estimation of International Height Reference System (IHRS) coordinates in Argentina C. Tocho et al. 10.1515/jogs-2022-0139