46 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Urban flask measurements of CO2ff and CO to identify emission sources at different site types in Auckland, New Zealand H. Young et al. 10.1098/rsta.2022.0204
2. Zooming into Berlin: tracking street-scale CO2 emissions based on high-resolution traffic modeling using machine learning M. Anjos & F. Meier 10.3389/fenvs.2024.1461656
3. The Impact of COVID‐19 on CO2 Emissions in the Los Angeles and Washington DC/Baltimore Metropolitan Areas V. Yadav et al. 10.1029/2021GL092744
4. Towards sector-based attribution using intra-city variations in satellite-based emission ratios between CO2 and CO D. Wu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-14547-2022
5. Research overview of urban carbon emission measurement and future prospect for GHG monitoring network T. Xiong et al. 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.047
6. Comparing sources of uncertainty in community greenhouse gas estimation techniques M. Blackhurst & H. Matthews 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6084
7. The power and promise of improved climate data infrastructure K. Gurney & P. Shepson 10.1073/pnas.2114115118
8. Carbon Emission Status and Regional Differences of China: High-Resolution Estimation of Spatially Explicit Carbon Emissions at the Prefecture Level J. Guo et al. 10.3390/land14020291
9. Fine mapping and multidimensional analysis of carbon emission reduction in China F. Xu et al. 10.3389/fevo.2023.1163308
10. Carbon Monitor Cities near-real-time daily estimates of CO2 emissions from 1500 cities worldwide D. Huo et al. 10.1038/s41597-022-01657-z
11. Can we use atmospheric CO2 measurements to verify emission trends reported by cities? Lessons from a 6-year atmospheric inversion over Paris J. Lian et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8823-2023
12. Uncertainty analysis of a European high-resolution emission inventory of CO2 and CO to support inverse modelling and network design I. Super et al. 10.5194/acp-20-1795-2020
13. A portable reflected-sunlight spectrometer for CO2 and CH4 B. Löw et al. 10.5194/amt-16-5125-2023
14. An emerging GHG estimation approach can help cities achieve their climate and sustainability goals K. Mueller et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac0f25
15. Estimating nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions for the Los Angeles Megacity using mountaintop remote sensing observations O. Addington et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112351
16. Carbon-neutral cities: Critical review of theory and practice A. Huovila et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130912
17. Mapping the relationship between urban form and CO2 emissions in three US cities using the Local Climate Zones (LCZ) framework M. Javadpoor et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122723
18. Observing Anthropogenic and Biogenic CO2 Emissions in Los Angeles Using a Dense Sensor Network J. Kim et al. 10.1021/acs.est.4c11392
19. Downscaling Satellite Night-Time Light Imagery While Addressing the Blooming Effect N. Tziokas et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3429244
20. Contrasting Summertime Trends in Vehicle Combustion Efficiency in Los Angeles, CA and Salt Lake City, UT C. Yañez et al. 10.1021/acs.est.4c11701
21. Informing urban climate planning with high resolution data: the Hestia fossil fuel CO2 emissions for Baltimore, Maryland G. Roest et al. 10.1186/s13021-020-00157-0
22. Comparing a global high-resolution downscaled fossil fuel CO2 emission dataset to local inventory-based estimates over 14 global cities J. Chen et al. 10.1186/s13021-020-00146-3
23. Estimating CO2 emissions for 108 000 European cities D. Moran et al. 10.5194/essd-14-845-2022
24. Estimating global 0.1° scale gridded anthropogenic CO2 emissions using TROPOMI NO2 and a data-driven method Y. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175177
25. A multi-city urban atmospheric greenhouse gas measurement data synthesis L. Mitchell et al. 10.1038/s41597-022-01467-3
26. Variation of carbon dioxide mole fraction at a typical urban area in the Yangtze River Delta, China S. Fang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105884
27. Spatially explicit carbon emissions at the county scale Z. Long et al. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105706
28. Zooming-in for climate action—hyperlocal greenhouse gas data for mitigation action? M. Jungmann et al. 10.1007/s44168-022-00007-4
29. Household CO2 Emissions: Current Status and Future Perspectives L. Liu et al. 10.3390/ijerph17197077
30. Consistent weekly cycles of atmospheric NO2, CO, and CO2 in a North American megacity from ground-based, mountaintop, and satellite measurements H. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118809
31. Tracking the atmospheric pulse of a North American megacity from a mountaintop remote sensing observatory Z. Zeng et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112000
32. State-of-the-art carbon metering: Continuous emission monitoring systems for industrial applications N. Ding et al. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42308
33. Spatial modeling of micro‐scale carbon dioxide sources and sinks in urban environments: A novel approach to quantify urban impacts on global warming L. Khodakarami 10.1002/ghg.2273
34. Toward Accurate, Policy-Relevant Fossil Fuel CO2 Emission Landscapes K. Gurney et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c01175
35. Direct observations of CO2 emission reductions due to COVID-19 lockdown across European urban districts G. Nicolini et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154662
36. Development and applicability assessment of local-scale carbon emission models to support carbon neutrality plans of local governments Y. Jeong et al. 10.15531/KSCCR.2024.15.5.691
37. Decadal decrease in Los Angeles methane emissions is much smaller than bottom-up estimates Z. Zeng et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40964-w
38. Remote sensing of methane plumes: instrument tradeoff analysis for detecting and quantifying local sources at global scale S. Jongaramrungruang et al. 10.5194/amt-14-7999-2021
39. Large and seasonally varying biospheric CO 2 fluxes in the Los Angeles megacity revealed by atmospheric radiocarbon J. Miller et al. 10.1073/pnas.2005253117
40. Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service TEMPOral profiles (CAMS-TEMPO): global and European emission temporal profile maps for atmospheric chemistry modelling M. Guevara et al. 10.5194/essd-13-367-2021
41. Optimizing a dynamic fossil fuel CO2 emission model with CTDAS (CarbonTracker Data Assimilation Shell, v1.0) for an urban area using atmospheric observations of CO2, CO, NOx, and SO2 I. Super et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-2695-2020
42. Quantification of fossil fuel CO2 from combined CO, δ13CO2 and Δ14CO2 observations J. Kim et al. 10.5194/acp-23-14425-2023
43. The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on greenhouse gases: a multi-city analysis of in situ atmospheric observations V. Monteiro et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac66cb
44. Quantifying CO2 emissions of a city with the Copernicus Anthropogenic CO2 Monitoring satellite mission G. Kuhlmann et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6733-2020
45. Southern California megacity CO2, CH4, and CO flux estimates using ground- and space-based remote sensing and a Lagrangian model J. Hedelius et al. 10.5194/acp-18-16271-2018
46. Reductions in California's Urban Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions During the COVID‐19 Pandemic C. Yañez et al. 10.1029/2022AV000732