39 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Urban flask measurements of CO2ff and CO to identify emission sources at different site types in Auckland, New Zealand H. Young et al. 10.1098/rsta.2022.0204
2. The Impact of COVID‐19 on CO2 Emissions in the Los Angeles and Washington DC/Baltimore Metropolitan Areas V. Yadav et al. 10.1029/2021GL092744
3. Towards sector-based attribution using intra-city variations in satellite-based emission ratios between CO2 and CO D. Wu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-14547-2022
4. Research overview of urban carbon emission measurement and future prospect for GHG monitoring network T. Xiong et al. 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.047
5. Comparing sources of uncertainty in community greenhouse gas estimation techniques M. Blackhurst & H. Matthews 10.1088/1748-9326/ac6084
6. The power and promise of improved climate data infrastructure K. Gurney & P. Shepson 10.1073/pnas.2114115118
7. Fine mapping and multidimensional analysis of carbon emission reduction in China F. Xu et al. 10.3389/fevo.2023.1163308
8. Carbon Monitor Cities near-real-time daily estimates of CO2 emissions from 1500 cities worldwide D. Huo et al. 10.1038/s41597-022-01657-z
9. Can we use atmospheric CO2 measurements to verify emission trends reported by cities? Lessons from a 6-year atmospheric inversion over Paris J. Lian et al. 10.5194/acp-23-8823-2023
10. Uncertainty analysis of a European high-resolution emission inventory of CO<sub>2</sub> and CO to support inverse modelling and network design I. Super et al. 10.5194/acp-20-1795-2020
11. A portable reflected-sunlight spectrometer for CO2 and CH4 B. Löw et al. 10.5194/amt-16-5125-2023
12. An emerging GHG estimation approach can help cities achieve their climate and sustainability goals K. Mueller et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac0f25
13. Estimating nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions for the Los Angeles Megacity using mountaintop remote sensing observations O. Addington et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112351
14. Carbon-neutral cities: Critical review of theory and practice A. Huovila et al. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130912
15. Mapping the relationship between urban form and CO2 emissions in three US cities using the Local Climate Zones (LCZ) framework M. Javadpoor et al. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122723
16. Downscaling Satellite Night-Time Light Imagery While Addressing the Blooming Effect N. Tziokas et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3429244
17. Informing urban climate planning with high resolution data: the Hestia fossil fuel CO2 emissions for Baltimore, Maryland G. Roest et al. 10.1186/s13021-020-00157-0
18. Comparing a global high-resolution downscaled fossil fuel CO2 emission dataset to local inventory-based estimates over 14 global cities J. Chen et al. 10.1186/s13021-020-00146-3
19. Estimating CO2 emissions for 108 000 European cities D. Moran et al. 10.5194/essd-14-845-2022
20. Estimating global 0.1° scale gridded anthropogenic CO2 emissions using TROPOMI NO2 and a data-driven method Y. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175177
21. A multi-city urban atmospheric greenhouse gas measurement data synthesis L. Mitchell et al. 10.1038/s41597-022-01467-3
22. Variation of carbon dioxide mole fraction at a typical urban area in the Yangtze River Delta, China S. Fang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105884
23. Spatially explicit carbon emissions at the county scale Z. Long et al. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105706
24. Zooming-in for climate action—hyperlocal greenhouse gas data for mitigation action? M. Jungmann et al. 10.1007/s44168-022-00007-4
25. Household CO2 Emissions: Current Status and Future Perspectives L. Liu et al. 10.3390/ijerph17197077
26. Consistent weekly cycles of atmospheric NO2, CO, and CO2 in a North American megacity from ground-based, mountaintop, and satellite measurements H. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118809
27. Tracking the atmospheric pulse of a North American megacity from a mountaintop remote sensing observatory Z. Zeng et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112000
28. Spatial modeling of micro‐scale carbon dioxide sources and sinks in urban environments: A novel approach to quantify urban impacts on global warming L. Khodakarami 10.1002/ghg.2273
29. Toward Accurate, Policy-Relevant Fossil Fuel CO2 Emission Landscapes K. Gurney et al. 10.1021/acs.est.0c01175
30. Direct observations of CO2 emission reductions due to COVID-19 lockdown across European urban districts G. Nicolini et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154662
31. Decadal decrease in Los Angeles methane emissions is much smaller than bottom-up estimates Z. Zeng et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40964-w
32. Remote sensing of methane plumes: instrument tradeoff analysis for detecting and quantifying local sources at global scale S. Jongaramrungruang et al. 10.5194/amt-14-7999-2021
33. Large and seasonally varying biospheric CO 2 fluxes in the Los Angeles megacity revealed by atmospheric radiocarbon J. Miller et al. 10.1073/pnas.2005253117
34. Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service TEMPOral profiles (CAMS-TEMPO): global and European emission temporal profile maps for atmospheric chemistry modelling M. Guevara et al. 10.5194/essd-13-367-2021
35. Optimizing a dynamic fossil fuel CO<sub>2</sub> emission model with CTDAS (CarbonTracker Data Assimilation Shell, v1.0) for an urban area using atmospheric observations of CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub> I. Super et al. 10.5194/gmd-13-2695-2020
36. Quantification of fossil fuel CO2 from combined CO, δ13CO2 and Δ14CO2 observations J. Kim et al. 10.5194/acp-23-14425-2023
37. The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on greenhouse gases: a multi-city analysis of in situ atmospheric observations V. Monteiro et al. 10.1088/2515-7620/ac66cb
38. Quantifying CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of a city with the Copernicus Anthropogenic CO<sub>2</sub> Monitoring satellite mission G. Kuhlmann et al. 10.5194/amt-13-6733-2020
39. Reductions in California's Urban Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions During the COVID‐19 Pandemic C. Yañez et al. 10.1029/2022AV000732