Dear authors,
Thank you for your responses to the reviewer comments and advice. This is mostly satisfactory and the paper is nearly ready for final publication. However, there are a few minor issues that should first be addressed:
1) The issue raised by reviewer #1 regarding the RH data is important and should be looked into a bit more closely and discussed further. For instance, there is a period of more than 1 year at Opabin when the RH hardly exceeds 90%. Is this really a mere calibration issue or instrument accuracy problem?
2) in Table S4, please make clear in the caption that these dates correspond to times when the sensor heights were adjusted. That is my assumption, but it isn't made explicitly clear.
3) Please be sure to acknowledge Chris Hopkinson and the Canadian Consortium for Lidar Environmental Applications Research (C-CLEAR) for the LiDAR data.
4) You note that "Meteorological measurements in the dataset are presented in raw and corrected form". Does this refer only to the precipitation? Or were other variables adjusted or records deleted in some instances if found to be erroneous? That could be made clearer in the text.