Dear Authors,

thank you for your replies to the reviews of your paper and for the revision. The overall tendency of the reviews of your paper was positive with recommended minor revisions and your suggestions for the revision as well as the implementation of these changes in the paper are convincing.
As you have submitted this paper to the special issue on “Linking landscape organisation and hydrological functioning: from hypotheses and observations to concepts, models and understanding", I would like to ask you to try to include some sentences in the introduction about the use of such datasets for improving our understanding of landscape coevolution and hydrological processes. I would also welcome more discussion on the merits of this dataset and potential use in future analysis for improving our understanding of the landscape organisation and hydrological functioning. I refer to the abstract of the special issue here too. https://www.earth-syst-sci-data.net/special_issue13_985.html. Finally, I would recommend to improve the quality of some of the figures (especially Figures 5 and 11). Also in the subscript to figure 5, it is not clear what the threshold line means without reading the text, please clarify in the subscript too.
I look forward to your final manuscript,

Best wishes,

Loes van Schaik

Dear authors,

thank you for the final revisions made to your article. I just noted that there were two little typos in the new subtext for Figure 5: "data below this threshold are exlcuded due to the influence of their sparse distribution on the overall relationship when we fitted qeuation (1) to our data)" : exlcuded and qeuation
I recommend to correct these and then the article can be published.

kind regards,

Loes van Schaik