the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global Carbon Budget 2017
Corinne Le Quéré
Robbie M. Andrew
Pierre Friedlingstein
Stephen Sitch
Julia Pongratz
Andrew C. Manning
Jan Ivar Korsbakken
Glen P. Peters
Josep G. Canadell
Robert B. Jackson
Thomas A. Boden
Pieter P. Tans
Oliver D. Andrews
Vivek K. Arora
Dorothee C. E. Bakker
Leticia Barbero
Meike Becker
Richard A. Betts
Laurent Bopp
Frédéric Chevallier
Louise P. Chini
Philippe Ciais
Catherine E. Cosca
Jessica Cross
Kim Currie
Thomas Gasser
Ian Harris
Judith Hauck
Vanessa Haverd
Richard A. Houghton
Christopher W. Hunt
George Hurtt
Tatiana Ilyina
Atul K. Jain
Etsushi Kato
Markus Kautz
Ralph F. Keeling
Kees Klein Goldewijk
Arne Körtzinger
Peter Landschützer
Nathalie Lefèvre
Andrew Lenton
Sebastian Lienert
Ivan Lima
Danica Lombardozzi
Nicolas Metzl
Frank Millero
Pedro M. S. Monteiro
David R. Munro
Julia E. M. S. Nabel
Shin-ichiro Nakaoka
Yukihiro Nojiri
X. Antonio Padin
Anna Peregon
Benjamin Pfeil
Denis Pierrot
Benjamin Poulter
Gregor Rehder
Janet Reimer
Christian Rödenbeck
Jörg Schwinger
Roland Séférian
Ingunn Skjelvan
Benjamin D. Stocker
Hanqin Tian
Bronte Tilbrook
Francesco N. Tubiello
Ingrid T. van der Laan-Luijkx
Guido R. van der Werf
Steven van Heuven
Nicolas Viovy
Nicolas Vuichard
Anthony P. Walker
Andrew J. Watson
Andrew J. Wiltshire
Sönke Zaehle
Dan Zhu
Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the global carbon budget
– is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. CO2 emissions from fossil fuels and industry (EFF) are based on energy statistics and cement production data, respectively, while emissions from land-use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land-cover change data and bookkeeping models. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured directly and its rate of growth (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO2 sink (SOCEAN) and terrestrial CO2 sink (SLAND) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting carbon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changes in the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the last decade available (2007–2016), EFF was 9.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, ELUC 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, GATM 4.7 ± 0.1 GtC yr−1, SOCEAN 2.4 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, and SLAND 3.0 ± 0.8 GtC yr−1, with a budget imbalance BIM of 0.6 GtC yr−1 indicating overestimated emissions and/or underestimated sinks. For year 2016 alone, the growth in EFF was approximately zero and emissions remained at 9.9 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1. Also for 2016, ELUC was 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, GATM was 6.1 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1, SOCEAN was 2.6 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1, and SLAND was 2.7 ± 1.0 GtC yr−1, with a small BIM of −0.3 GtC. GATM continued to be higher in 2016 compared to the past decade (2007–2016), reflecting in part the high fossil emissions and the small SLAND consistent with El Niño conditions. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 402.8 ± 0.1 ppm averaged over 2016. For 2017, preliminary data for the first 6–9 months indicate a renewed growth in EFF of +2.0 % (range of 0.8 to 3.0 %) based on national emissions projections for China, USA, and India, and projections of gross domestic product (GDP) corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets used in this new global carbon budget compared with previous publications of this data set (Le Quéré et al., 2016, 2015b, a, 2014, 2013). All results presented here can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2017 (GCP, 2017).
- Article
(7945 KB) - Full-text XML