the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
C-PEAT’s Global Peatland Carbon Database (v.2025)
Abstract. Field-based measurements are foundational to the study of short- and long-term peatland carbon dynamics. For decades, the scientific community has amassed hundreds of valuable empirical datasets in the form of peat core records from around the world. Those records typically include peat depth, basal age, peat organic matter content, peat dry bulk density, peat organic density, and/or carbon and nitrogen content. Once combined with chronological constraints and models, peat core time series can be used to estimate changes in peat-carbon accumulation rates through time. Consolidating these peat records can help improve global peat-carbon stock estimates and quantifications of past, present, and future greenhouse gas exchanges between peatlands and the atmosphere. Large-scale synthesis can also shed light on the sensitivity of peat-carbon accumulation processes to climate change and provide context for current and future global environmental change. We can also use spatial and temporal peat data to inform, validate, and benchmark existing models that include peatland representations. This paper presents the first formal version of PAGES’ C-PEAT Global Peatland Carbon Database (GD), which is available for download in the PANGAEA and International Soil Carbon Network (ISCN) data repositories. The C-PEAT GD contains 267 independently catalogued peat cores and a large number of observations from those cores, including: peat depths, organic matter content values, dry bulk density values, organic density values, as well as carbon and nitrogen content values. Raw and calibrated chronological data are included for each individual dataset when available. The metadata fields are easily searchable and interoperable, as per PANGAEA’s standards. The main objective of this article is to describe the structure and content of the database, itself aimed at increasing the use, assimilation, and interoperability of peat-core data across disciplines. The C-PEAT GD can be accessed at the PANGAEA data repository (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.986891; Loisel et al., 2025).
- Preprint
(1225 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2026-222', Anonymous Referee #1, 30 May 2026
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Julie Loisel, 18 Jun 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2026-222/essd-2026-222-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Julie Loisel, 18 Jun 2026
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2026-222', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Jun 2026
The paper presents the C-PEAT Global Peatland Carbon Database v.2025, with 267 peat cores and large numbers of depth measurements, including dry bulk density, organic matter, carbon, nitrogen, raw chronological data, and calibrated ages.
Few comments
-The title says “Global Peatland Carbon Database”, which is fine but the dataset is heavily dominated by northern extratropical sites. This is a major limitation because tropical peatlands differ strongly in peat formation, hydrology,etc. The paper does clearly discuss this
Whether there is a possibility for future improvements for e.g. many data are now collected in the ttropics eg
Anshari, Gusti Z., et al. "Peatland inception and development across Kalimantan, Indonesia." Scientific Reports (2026).
-The manuscript says PANGAEA performed quality control, but it does not fully explain what was checked, what was corrected, and what remains uncertain.
For example, Table 5 reports unrealistic values of max : dry bulk density values up to 3.380 g cm⁻³, total carbon up to 100%, and nitrogen at 56.6%.
- Table 6. The peat versus mineral soil comparison is interesting, but it is distracting. The comparison needs more caution because NCSS is not a globally representative mineral-soil dataset in the same way that C-PEAT is not globally representative of peatlands. Also, the NCSS table includes impossible or problematic values such as negative SOC and coarse fraction up to 4229%,
- The manuscript compares C-PEAT with the NCSS pedon database and reports that “On average, soil organic carbon content for the top 100 cm was 16 times greater in peat soils 17.53 g cm⁻² than in mineral soils 1.08 g cm⁻².” This seems to be erroneous
SOC stock=bulk density×C fraction×depth
For the top 100 cm: 0.140×0.467×100=6.54 g C /cm2
Alternatively, using their reported mean organic C density: 0.058×100=5.8 g C /cm2
So the cited value does not make sense
-“C-PEAT GD contains 267 cores”, explain whether duplicate cores across previous syntheses were reconciled and how.
“carbon content values (total carbon and carbon combined)” Better “C%, TC%, and TOC% records combined.”
-The paper includes age determination and calibrated age parameters, but the treatment of chronological uncertainty is still descriptive. The number of chronological constraints varies from 1 to 41 per core, with a median of 6, and the average is only 0.76 dates per 1000 years. That means carbon accumulation rates can be highly uncertain
-For a data paper, the question is: How should users use this database correctly? The paper has usage notes, but they are too general.
The database is useful for summarising peat properties, analysing Holocene apparent carbon accumulation rates, and benchmarking Earth system models, and global mapping of peat properties. See also recent peat data and mapping effort that the C-peat can contribute to
Skye et al. "Peat-DBase v. 1: a compiled database of global peat depth measurements." Earth System Science Data Discussions 2025 (2025): 1-26.
Widyastuti et al. "Digital mapping of peat thickness and carbon stock of global peatlands." Catena 258 (2025): 109243.
The writing is generally clear but somewhat sloppy in presentation, mainly because of inconsistent terminology, awkward phrasing, formatting errors.
Some examples:
L.39 "peat soil-c density" -> "peat soil C density" or "peat-soil C density"
L.63–64 "The need for transparency in methods, code, and data have also been fueling..." -> "The need for transparency in methods, code, and data has.."
L.79 "provides means to assess" -> "a means to assess"
L.97 "with the latter also acknowledging..." -> "Fig. 2 also acknowledges..."
L.128 "peatland C storage (kgC)" -> "peatland C storage (kg C)"
L.129 "C density (kgC/m2)" -> "C density (kg C m⁻²)"
L.131 "gC/m2/yr" -> "g C m⁻² yr⁻¹"
L.143 "the use of these datasets come with important limitations" -> "the use of these datasets comes with important limitations"
L.212 "4 thesis, dissertations, and conference papers" -> "4 theses "
L.233 "labs where the analysis were performed" -> "laboratories where the analyses were performed"
L.252,259, 310 "representativity" -> "representativeness"
L.260 "MAT and MAP was extracted" -> "MAT and MAP were extracted"
L.268 "we also contrast changes" -> "we also contrasted changes"
L.315–320 "KoppenGeiger" / "Koppen climate classes" -> "Köppen–Geiger" / "Köppen climate classes"
L.344 "g/cm3" -> "g cm⁻³"
L.367 "may be used as references" -> "may be used as reference values"
L.403–405 "IQT" -> "IQR"
L.405 "1.5 x IQT" -> "1.5 × IQR"
L.431 "Soil Organic Carbon" -> "soil organic carbon"
L.455 "some of them may not have reached" -> "some cores may not have reached"
L.456 "Along those lines" -> "Similarly" or "In addition"
L.459 "collected near the edge" -> "collected near basin margins"
Etc.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2026-222-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Julie Loisel, 18 Jun 2026
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://essd.copernicus.org/preprints/essd-2026-222/essd-2026-222-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Julie Loisel, 18 Jun 2026
Data sets
C-PEAT Global Peatland Carbon Database v.2025 Julie Loisel, Dana Ransby, and Angela V. Gallego-Sala https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.986891
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 248 | 62 | 20 | 330 | 16 | 16 |
- HTML: 248
- PDF: 62
- XML: 20
- Total: 330
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 16
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
Please find my comments in the attached file.