the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Dynamics of China’s Forest Carbon Storage: The First 30 m Annual Aboveground Biomass Mapping from 1985 to 2023
Abstract. Accurate estimation and monitoring of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) are essential for understanding carbon dynamics, managing forest resources, and guiding environmental policies. However, the spatial and temporal patterns, dynamics, and driving factors of forest AGB in China over recent decades remain insufficiently understood, hindering ecosystem analysis and forest management strategies. This study combines multi-source remote sensing data with residual neural networks (ResNets) to develop the first 30 m resolution annual China Forest AGB dataset (1985–2023) with uncertainty quantification. Validation results confirm the robustness of the ResNets model, achieving an R2 of 0.92, RMSE of 16.06 Mg/ha, and Bias of 0.06 Mg/ha against GEDI footprint AGBD, and an R2 of 0.63, RMSE of 68.26 Mg/ha, and Bias of -19.87 Mg/ha against independent multi-year ground survey data. The dataset reveals a notable increase in China’s average forest aboveground biomass density (AGBD) from 95.74±11.30 Mg/ha in 1985 to 122.69±13.94 Mg/ha in 2023. During this period, total forest aboveground carbon (AGC) stock rose from 5.50±0.23 PgC to 13.97±0.87 PgC, establishing China’s forests as a significant carbon sink over the past four decades, with a net carbon sink of 0.22±0.01 PgC yr⁻¹, offsetting 11.5 %–14.9 % of China’s fossil fuel and industrial emissions. Forest growth contributed 65.1 % (5.75 PgC) of the total AGC increase, while forest expansion accounted for 34.9 % (3.09 PgC). This dataset provides critical information for forest carbon accounting in China and offers valuable insights for climate change mitigation, ecosystem conservation, and sustainable land management.
Competing interests: At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Earth System Science Data.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.- Preprint
(3404 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1244 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 29 Jun 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-96', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Jun 2025
reply
This study combines multi-source remote sensing data with residual neural networks (ResNets) to develop the first 30 m resolution annual China Forest AGB dataset (1985–2023) with uncertainty quantification. It’s a long-term series of AGB data, which is of great significance for estimating forest carbon sink in China.
Comments:
1. Introduction
- The first three paragraghs need to be condensed.
- Line 90-100, It is best to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the existing data. eg: Have you compared international time series data, such as the AGB data of the European Space Agency, etc.
- Why did you choose the ResNet-based deep learning algorithm? You should make it clear, because this is your core technical approach.
2. Methodology & Data
- The GEDI AGBD samples are between 2019 to 2021, and field survey data across China is from the 1990s to the 2010s. How did you deal with the gap in time.
- Given that GEDI data has only been available since 2019, how to ensure the model's predictive ability for the early years (1985-2018) requires a more detailed explanation.
3. Results
- Spatial pattern of forest AGB: Figure 6 shows the spatial pattern of AGB in 2023, but it lacks corresponding diagrams for earlier years (such as 1985), making it difficult to visually compare the changes. It is suggested to supplement the AGB distribution map of key years.
- Trends in AGBD/AGC: Critique the reported increase in AGBD (95.74 to 122.69 Mg/ha) and AGC stock (5.50 to 13.97 PgC). Are these trends plausible given China’s afforestation efforts?
- Drivers of Change: Evaluate the partitioning of AGC growth (65.1% forest growth vs. 34.9% expansion). Are these proportions supported by ancillary data (e.g., land-use maps)?
4. Discussion
- You compared trends of different datasets, your data has a long time series, is there more accurate for every year? I think you’d better use field data to verify.
- Although the comparison with GEDI data showed a smaller deviation (0.06 Mg/ha), the comparison with ground survey data showed a larger negative deviation (-19.87 Mg/ha), especially in the tropical rainforest area (-68.57 Mg/ha). This systematic deviation requires more in-depth analysis and discussion.
- Although the paper discusses the influence of different canopy coverage thresholds on AGB estimation in lines 547-555, it does not quantitatively explain the degree of influence of using different thresholds (such as 10% vs. 20%) on the main conclusions of this study. It is suggested to add sensitivity analysis.
Data sets
CFATD: The First High-Spatiotemporal-Resolution Mapping of Forest Aboveground Biomass in China from 1985 to 2023 (Part Ⅵ: 2022-2023) Yaotong Cai, Peng Zhu, Xing Li, Xiaoping Liu, Yuhe Chen, Qianhui Shen, Xiaocong Xu, Honghui Zhang, Sheng Nie, Cheng Wang, Jia Wang, Bingjie Li, Changjiang Wu, and Haoming Zhuang https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12747329
CFATD: The First High-Spatiotemporal-Resolution Mapping of Forest Aboveground Biomass in China from 1985 to 2023 (Part Ⅴ: 2016-2021) Yaotong Cai, Peng Zhu, Xing Li, Xiaoping Liu, Yuhe Chen, Qianhui Shen, Xiaocong Xu, Honghui Zhang, Sheng Nie, Cheng Wang, Jia Wang, Bingjie Li, Changjiang Wu, and Haoming Zhuang https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12742210
CFATD: The First High-Spatiotemporal-Resolution Mapping of Forest Aboveground Biomass in China from 1985 to 2023 (Part Ⅳ: 2009-2015) Yaotong Cai, Peng Zhu, Xing Li, Xiaoping Liu, Yuhe Chen, Qianhui Shen, Xiaocong Xu, Honghui Zhang, Sheng Nie, Cheng Wang, Jia Wang, Bingjie Li, Changjiang Wu, and Haoming Zhuang https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12658255
CFATD: The First High-Spatiotemporal-Resolution Mapping of Forest Aboveground Biomass in China from 1985 to 2023 (Part Ⅲ: 2002-2008) Yaotong Cai, Peng Zhu, Xing Li, Xiaoping Liu, Yuhe Chen, Qianhui Shen, Xiaocong Xu, Honghui Zhang, Sheng Nie, Cheng Wang, Jia Wang, Bingjie Li, Changjiang Wu, and Haoming Zhuang https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12655492
CFATD: The First High-Spatiotemporal-Resolution Mapping of Forest Aboveground Biomass in China from 1985 to 2023 (Part Ⅱ: 1994-2001) Yaotong Cai, Peng Zhu, Xing Li, Xiaoping Liu, Yuhe Chen, Qianhui Shen, Xiaocong Xu, Honghui Zhang, Sheng Nie, Cheng Wang, Jia Wang, Bingjie Li, Changjiang Wu, and Haoming Zhuang https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12637101
CFATD: The First High-Spatiotemporal-Resolution Mapping of Forest Aboveground Biomass in China from 1985 to 2023 (Part Ⅰ: 1985-1993) Yaotong Cai, Peng Zhu, Xing Li, Xiaoping Liu, Yuhe Chen, Qianhui Shen, Xiaocong Xu, Honghui Zhang, Sheng Nie, Cheng Wang, Jia Wang, Bingjie Li, Changjiang Wu, and Haoming Zhuang https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12620984
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,026 | 155 | 16 | 1,197 | 38 | 17 | 24 |
- HTML: 1,026
- PDF: 155
- XML: 16
- Total: 1,197
- Supplement: 38
- BibTeX: 17
- EndNote: 24
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1