the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
OasisMap30: A 30 m annual land cover dataset of China's oases from 1987 to 2024
Abstract. High spatio-temporal resolution maps of oasis land cover are valuable for understanding ecological and societal development processes in dryland regions. However, the relatively late development of oasis research, combined with the highly fragmented structure of oases and their frequent land cover transitions, has made it challenging to construct high spatio-temporal resolution land cover datasets for oases. As a result, dedicated data products of this kind are still lacking. Here, we developed a framework for annual 30 m land cover mapping that integrates Landsat satellite imagery, machine learning, a temporal segmentation approach (LandTrendr), and principal component analysis. Using this framework, we produced a 30 m resolution annual land-cover dataset for Chinese oases (OasisMap30) for the period 1987–2024 on the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. Accuracy assessment based on more than 6,300 visually interpreted samples demonstrates high accuracy of OasisMap30 (overall accuracy >90 %). In cross-product comparisons based on visually interpreted and third-party test samples, OasisMap30 exhibits considerable advantages in terms of classification accuracy and error reduction. Moreover, in comparison with several 30 m resolution thematic products for impervious surface, cropland, and surface water, we found an impressive consistency between OasisMap30 and these datasets. Using OasisMap30, we investigated the changes in land cover patterns of Chinese oases. The results show that oasis area expanded by 45.87 % (+7.75 Mha) between 1987 and 2024, primarily driven by cropland expansion and grassland restoration. Specifically, 4.04 Mha of desert were restored to grassland, and 3.19 Mha were converted from desert to cropland. In addition, OasisMap30 reveals the expansion of impervious surfaces (0.58 Mha) and surface water (0.35 Mha), as well as conversions among land cover types, such as the conversion of 3.12 Mha of grassland to cropland. Overall, the consistent, high-resolution OasisMap30 data can substantially support studies on the evolution of oasis landscape patterns, socio-ecological responses, and spatial pattern optimization, thereby contributing to the sustainable development of oasis regions. The full archive of OasisMap30 is freely available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30798032 (Chen et al., 2025).
- Preprint
(2692 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(2187 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 01 Apr 2026)
- RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-818', Anonymous Referee #1, 27 Jan 2026 reply
-
RC2: 'Comment on essd-2025-818', Anonymous Referee #2, 24 Feb 2026
reply
This work produced a valuable datasets on the oasis of China. Generally, the method for data production is reasonable. My concerns mainly related to the basic definition of oasis. The detail comments are given below.
- The definition of oasis must be clearly described. The present version of the preprint defined it as "all land-cover types other than barren land". Oasis is a geographical complex of various land cover types including areas with vegetation cover and non vegetation cover. According to the nature of the oasis, it is defined following several criteria at least: (1) located in desert areas; (2) with water sources in the forms such as streams, rivers, ground water, constructed channels et al.;(3) specific plants and other organisms formed azonal vegetated landscape.
- In desert areas, the precipitation and the water resources featured with great annual fluctuation. Thus the abrupt change in reflectance may not indicate a change in land cover types. I suggest a caution when use annual indices such as NDVI in mapping, and considered the impacts of climate fluctuation on the accuracy.
- As to the comparison with other land cover products, resolutions of the land cover products matters. For instance, spatial resolution of MCD12Q1 is 500 m, while ESACCI_LC is 300 m. The comparison with land cover dataset greatly differed in spatial resolution is no sense. What's more, evaluating the accuracy of other datasets using the samples collected for OasisMap30 directly may not reasonable due to the difference in resolution.
After going through the manuscript, there are some errors, or unreasonable expressions. Some examples are given below.
- Figure 2, the table overlays with map.
- In figure S2, there are errors in label of X axis.
- In line 80-81, the remark "we manually inspected the imagery and masked out mountain regions and clearly unvegetated deserts (e.g., the Taklamakan Desert)" is not consistent to the data described in the next sections and the supplement. Oasis in the Taklamakan Desert also were mapped.
- As illustrated in Figure 2 and 3, the legend non-oasis is not reasonable. According to the definition of oasis, fragmented barren areas within an oasis are elements of oasis. I suggest a modification of the relevant figures.
- In Figure 3, the dashed lines were used to show the mountains. However, mountains also areas. To avoid the misunderstanding of readers, change the symbols of mountains. For instance, only keep the text labels.
Data sets
OasisMap30: A 30m annual land cover dataset of China's oases from 1987 to 2024 Peng Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30798032
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 232 | 94 | 17 | 343 | 52 | 18 | 31 |
- HTML: 232
- PDF: 94
- XML: 17
- Total: 343
- Supplement: 52
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 31
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
This manuscript introduces a long-term, high-resolution oasis land-cover dataset, which is valuable for understanding the spatio-temporal dynamics of oasis systems and for related environmental and resource management applications. However, the current manuscript still contains several issues, including technical details and result presentation, that need to be addressed. My specific comments are provided below.
Major comments:
Minor revision:
Line 97 The manuscript states that the tasseled cap transformation was applied using coefficients from Crist et al. (1985). Given that this study uses Landsat 5, 7, and 8 data, the authors should check and clarify whether the cited coefficients are appropriate for all sensors involved.
Line 126 “…a single composite disturbance metric (MAGPCA)”, “PCA” should be a subscript.
Line 129 “…we obtained DURmode and YODmode maps”, “mode” should be a subscript.
Line 136 In Section 2.6, the manuscript describes an evaluation of the dispersion of the detected year-of-disturbance (YOD). However, the results of this analysis (e.g., in figures or tables) are missing. The authors should provide the relevant results to support this analysis.
Line 195 The manuscript reports accuracy assessment results, but it is unclear whether the training and validation samples are spatially well distributed across the study area. Additional details on the spatial distribution of the samples should be provided.
Line 321 Grammatical error: “producing a high spatio-temporal resolution land cover datasets for oases are essential …”.