Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-76
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-76
25 Feb 2025
 | 25 Feb 2025
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ESSD.

NorESM-bcoi-v1: A bias-corrected reanalysis of ocean biogeochemistry at >40° N, 1980–2020, based on a global ocean model hindcast

Philip John Wallhead, Jörg Schwinger, Jerry Tjiputra, Trond Kristiansen, and Richard Garth James Bellerby

Abstract. Accurate and gap-free historical datasets of oceanic nutrient concentrations, dissolved oxygen, and carbonate chemistry, are needed for the analysis of anthropogenic impacts and development of predictive models, including as boundary conditions for regional ocean models. We developed low-bias, quasi-optimal 4D interpolations of observed values at latitudes >40° N, excluding Mediterranean and Black Seas, for years 1980–2020 inclusive. Our approach used output from the NorESM-OCv1.2 ocean model hindcast as a basis for kernel-smoothing bias correction and optimal interpolation of anomalies, obtaining monthly reanalysis data at NorESM grid points (30–90 km spatial resolution) and all model depth levels. Based on cross-validation tests with spatially-separated training and test subset locations, the resulting products showed equal or better interpolative accuracy compared to standard climatological products from the World Ocean Atlas 2023 and GLODAPv2, and also compared to existing non-climatological products from machine learning and biogeochemical reanalysis/hindcast datasets from CMEMS/Copernicus. The new products showed skill in tracking smooth seasonal and interannual variations not included in the standard climatologies, and improved spatial coverage and detail resolution in northern/Arctic regions, compared to all tested alternatives. Significant uncertainties remained, however, largely due to sparse observational coverage in seasonal and permanent ice-covered regions, and limited resolution in coastal regions. The NorESM-bcoi-v1 reanalysis data, as well as the associated quality-controlled in situ observational compilations (NORBGCv1) and code used to develop the reanalysis, can be downloaded from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14525787 (Wallhead et al., 2024).

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Share
Philip John Wallhead, Jörg Schwinger, Jerry Tjiputra, Trond Kristiansen, and Richard Garth James Bellerby

Status: open (until 03 Apr 2025)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Philip John Wallhead, Jörg Schwinger, Jerry Tjiputra, Trond Kristiansen, and Richard Garth James Bellerby

Data sets

NorESM-bcoi-v1 reanalysis data for ocean biogeochemistry at >40° N, 1980-2020, and basis compilations of quality-controlled observations (NORBGCv1). Philip Wallhead et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14525787

Philip John Wallhead, Jörg Schwinger, Jerry Tjiputra, Trond Kristiansen, and Richard Garth James Bellerby

Viewed

Total article views: 70 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
61 8 1 70 1 1
  • HTML: 61
  • PDF: 8
  • XML: 1
  • Total: 70
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Feb 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Feb 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 68 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 68 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 03 Mar 2025
Download
Short summary
We developed a novel method to combine ocean data from observations and models, and applied it to produce gridded estimates of nutrients, oxygen, dissolved inorganic carbon and total alkalinity concentrations at latitudes >40° N and years 1980–2020. The new estimates showed improved accuracy and coverage relative to previous estimates, but highlighted remaining uncertainty in some poorly sampled regions. The work was largely motivated by a need for accurate input data for regional ocean models.
Share
Altmetrics