the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A 1 km Hourly High-Resolution 3D Wind Field Dataset over the Yangtze River Delta Incorporating Dynamical Downscaling, Observational Assimilation, and Land Use Updates
Abstract. High-resolution three-dimensional (3D) wind field data are critical for a wide range of applications, including wind energy assessment, low-altitude aviation, air quality modeling, and extreme weather forecasting. Although ERA5 reanalysis remains widely used, its relatively coarse spatial resolution (~31 km) limits its ability to capture local-scale atmospheric processes. To address this, this study develops an hourly 3D dynamic wind field dataset with 1 km horizontal resolution covering the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region during the summer months (June–August) from 2021 to 2023, namely YRD1km, generated through advanced dynamical downscaling of ERA5 using a customized Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model configuration. The methodology integrates multi-source observational nudging with high-resolution land use parameterization to enhance near-surface wind accuracy and terrain-induced flow representation, particularly in urban clusters and mountainous areas. Validation against ground-based observations confirms the superior performance of YRD1km over ERA5 for hourly 10-m wind components, with Mean Absolute Error (MAE) reduced by approximately 22 % for U and 26 % for V, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) reduced by 18 % for U and 23 % for V, and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) improved by 33 % and 40 %, respectively. On a daily mean basis, both MAE and RMSE are reduced to below 0.4 m/s, and NSE reaches approximately 0.88. Spatially, YRD1km captures finer spatial wind speed gradients and localized terrain-induced circulations that are not captured by ERA5. Temporally, consistent accuracy improvements with approximately 20 % lower hourly error variability are seen when compared to ERA5. Vertically, 42.2 % accuracy gains are observed in the near-surface layer when compared with radiosonde profiles. Moreover, in a representative convective storm case, YRD1km captures multi-level wind structures that are closely linked to the initiation and continuous development of deep convection, highlighting its diagnostic advantage in high-impact weather events. Overall, the YRD1km 3D wind field dataset and its integrated methodological framework provide a robust foundation for regional meteorological applications, including high-resolution AI-based forecasting, renewable energy planning, and weather risk management in rapidly developing regions such as the YRD. The YRD1km 3D wind field dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.57760/sciencedb.23752 (Zhang et al., 2025).
- Preprint
(19502 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-419', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Oct 2025
reply
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yan-An Liu, 24 Dec 2025
reply
Comments:
1. The manuscript evaluates the dataset mainly using MAE / RMSE / NSE, but the verification metrics used in Figures 5 and 6 appear inconsistent with those used elsewhere. Unless there is a justified reason for deviation, please ensure that the verification metrics are consistent throughout the manuscript. If this is not possible, please provide an explanation in the methods section or the figure captions.
Thank you for this thoughtful comment. In our original manuscript, we aimed to maintain consistency in the statistical metrics and initially calculated and plotted MAE, RMSE, and NSE. Upon analyzing their temporal variations, we observed that MAE and RMSE exhibited highly similar trends. To present the results more clearly, we therefore retained only MAE and NSE in the figures. A similar relationship was observed for the vertical validation in Figure 6.
We fully understand that this simplification may have caused confusion, and we sincerely appreciate your suggestion for greater consistency. In response, we have revised Figures 5 and 6 accordingly. Specifically, RMSE has been added to Figure 5, and Bias in Figure 6 has been replaced by MAE to align with the evaluation framework used elsewhere in the manuscript.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-419-AC1 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC1', Yan-An Liu, 25 Dec 2025
reply
We sincerely thank the reviewer for the thoughtful and constructive comments. We have carefully considered each point and revised the manuscript accordingly. Detailed responses to all comments are provided below and can be found in the attached file.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yan-An Liu, 24 Dec 2025
reply
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 380 | 194 | 26 | 600 | 26 | 36 |
- HTML: 380
- PDF: 194
- XML: 26
- Total: 600
- BibTeX: 26
- EndNote: 36
Viewed (geographical distribution)
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
The authors have developed a high-resolution 3D wind field dataset (YRD1km) over the Yangtze River Delta by running WRF driven by ERA5 reanalysis, assimilating observations, and updating land-use information. This dataset addresses a significant lack of high-resolution, 3D wind products in this important region during the summer months. However, the manuscript still has several structural and methodological issues. Therefore, I recommend that it be considered for publication only after major revision.
Comments: