the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Australia’s terrestrial industrial footprint and ecological intactness
Abstract. Australia's unique biodiversity faces significant threats from anthropogenic activities that drive habitat destruction and degradation. This study presents the first comprehensive national-scale cumulative pressure map for terrestrial Australia since the 1980s, providing key insights into human disturbance of the landscape. We developed a Human Industrial Footprint (HIF) index incorporating 16 nationally relevant pressure layers, offering a more accurate representation of industrial influences than previous global-scale analyses. The HIF was used to derive an Ecological Intactness Index (EII), accounting for habitat quality, fragmentation, and connectivity. A technical validation comparing visually scored pressures in 1397 stratified random samples using high-resolution satellite images revealed a strong agreement with the HIF. We also conducted an uncertainty (sensitivity) analysis by adjusting individual pressure scores by up to ±50 % across 100,000 simulations, which showed a moderate impact on cumulative pressure scores, confirming the robustness of our approach. We believe these high-resolution datasets can be valuable tools for guiding conservation efforts, such as informing protected area expansion, ecosystem restoration priorities, and biodiversity offset strategies. By offering a detailed assessment of cumulative pressures and ecological integrity, this study addresses a critical knowledge gap, and can support evidence-based decision-making for Australia's biodiversity conservation and sustainable development objectives. The HIF, EII, and scaled pressure layers are available at 10.5281/zenodo.15833395 (Venegas-Li et al., 2025).
- Preprint
(1235 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(643 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 11 Sep 2025)
Data sets
Australia's terrestrial industrial footprint and ecological intactness Ruben Venegas Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14999050
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
375 | 49 | 23 | 447 | 19 | 9 | 11 |
- HTML: 375
- PDF: 49
- XML: 23
- Total: 447
- Supplement: 19
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1