the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Soil surface change data of high spatio-temporal resolution from the plot to the catchment scale
Abstract. Limitations of current process-based soil erosion models, valuable tools for predicting and managing soil erosion, lie particularly with today’s data availability, parameter uncertainty, and the integration of changing environmental conditions. This study presents a novel approach to enhance soil erosion modelling through the utilisation of nested high-resolution spatio-temporal data obtained through structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry. This technique permits comprehensive observation of soil surface elevation changes during precipitation events, encompassing data acquisition at diverse scales, from plot to slope to micro-catchment. The study presents a worldwide unique dataset that integrates high-resolution time-lapse photogrammetry, field measurements, and UAV (uncrewed aerial vehicle) photogrammetric data, collected over nearly four years. This dataset is intended to enhance the understanding of soil erosion processes and serve as a valuable resource for model evaluation and calibration. The authors encourage the broader scientific community to utilise and expand this dataset, which is expected to contribute to the development of more accurate soil erosion models, thereby improving predictions and management strategies.
- Preprint
(2240 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(330 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 08 Oct 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-380', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Aug 2025
reply
This is very nice data set and it good to see the team making it available for the research community. I support the intention to publish it, but I think manuscript needs some significant work to make it suitable for publication.
Most of my recommendations are minor, but there are a lot of them. These are marked on the accompanying PDF, mostly they surround improving the clarity of the manuscript and improving the descriptions of the data and the experimental set-up. Paragraphs often jump around between subjects and it is not always clear what the subject of a particular sentence is. I would recommend some thorough editing and proof reading during the revision.
I have three substantive comments:
- Additional rainfall simulator sites are mentioned, almost in passing. These are not fully described in the manuscript . If you want to retain them then they need to be.
- You need to be clear what the data is useful for. You focus on soil erosion modelling, but in some places, you state it is useful for model testing and in others for model development. I can see the argument for testing and calibration, but the argument for model development is less clear and needs to be expanded. In a similar vein you mention upscaling, but don’t expand on how h this data set helps with this problem.
- The description of the catchment data is weak in comparison to the other data sets. No erosion statistics are given. Is it just a DEM of a catchment? If so, it isn’t very interesting and perhaps needs to be removed from the paper.
Please see the annotated PDF for further comments which should be addressed.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
397 | 29 | 11 | 437 | 25 | 12 | 12 |
- HTML: 397
- PDF: 29
- XML: 11
- Total: 437
- Supplement: 25
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1