the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global high-resolution forest disturbance type dataset
Abstract. Forests play a pivotal role in global carbon cycling and biodiversity conservation, yet they face increasing disturbances from both anthropogenic and natural drivers. This study presents the first high-resolution (30-m) global forest disturbance dataset (GFD) for 2000–2020, classifying 11 disturbance types by integrating Landsat-based Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) time-series analysis with spatial metrics and machine learning. A total of 57,000 expert-validated samples were used to train and validate a decision tree model, achieving an overall accuracy of 94.88 %. The results reveal that forestry disturbance (43.79±0.31 %), shifting cultivation (24.32±0.28 %), and forest fires (11.45±0.05 %) dominate global forest loss. There are regional differences in global forest disturbance, such as farmland expansion in South America and Africa, forest fires in northern regions, and shifting cultivation in tropical regions. Disturbed forests span 1,247.06±11.18 Mha, accounting for 30.87 % of the global forest area. Notably, 2.76 % of global forests were newly established, primarily in China, India, and Brazil. Spatial consistency analysis with existing datasets (R2=0.93) confirms the reliability of the GFD product. The GFD dataset advances our understanding of forest dynamics and underscores the need for targeted conservation strategies in an era of escalating environmental change. The 30 m resolution GFD generated by this study is openly available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28465178 (Liu et al., 2025a).
- Preprint
(1664 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 11 Aug 2025)
-
CC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-346', zhou yuming, 27 Jun 2025
reply
The data reveal the types of global forest disturbances, which is helpful for global intervention and protection according to local conditions, and has guiding significance for forest prediction research at the national scale.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-346-CC1 -
CC2: 'Comment on essd-2025-346', Shu Fu, 27 Jun 2025
reply
Forests are a massive carbon reservoir, and assessing their carbon disturbances requires comprehensive and detailed identification of forest disturbance types. This research provides reliable data and technical support for evaluating local and even global forest carbon disturbances.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-346-CC2 -
CC3: 'Comment on essd-2025-346', Zhang Jimin, 27 Jun 2025
reply
This pioneering study delivers the first 30-m resolution global forest disturbance dataset , classifying 11 types via Landsat time-series, spatial metrics, and machine learning. Achieving 94.88% accuracy with 57,000 samples, it quantifies dominant drivers like forestry and wildfires .this resource revolutionizes carbon accounting and conservation planning, offering unmatched precision for global environmental governance.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-346-CC3 -
CC4: 'Comment on essd-2025-346', Chuhan Ji, 27 Jun 2025
reply
The 30m GFD dataset is a landmark, with 94.88% accuracy in classifying 11 forest disturbances (2000–2020). It enhances understanding of dynamics, aids carbon/biodiversity studies, and supports targeted conservation via reliable, open-access data.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-346-CC4 -
CC5: 'Comment on essd-2025-346', Tian Zhao, 27 Jun 2025
reply
This study makes a significant contribution to global forest monitoring by providing the first high-resolution (30 m) dataset of forest disturbance types over two decades, with robust validation and open access. By integrating Landsat-based Continuous Change Detection and Classification (CCDC) with spatial metrics and decision tree algorithms, the authors developed a robust classification framework that achieved an overall accuracy of 94.88%. The resulting dataset not only improves our ability to distinguish among 11 major forest disturbance types at a fine scale, but also provides critical support for carbon accounting, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable land management under global environmental change.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-346-CC5 -
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-346', Ian Evans, 14 Jul 2025
reply
from Ian S. Evans, Durham University, U.K.
GENERAL
It is useful to have maps of world distribution of different forest disturbance types and the authors provide a higher-resolution data set. The results appear reliable and mark a significant contribution to the state of the world’s forests.
13 situations are recognised (Table 1); of these, two ‘weak disturbances’ (drought, pests&diseases) are not considered, so 11 are mapped in Fig.5, including ‘undisturbed’ and ‘newly added forest’. Excluding undisturbed and new leaves 9 types of disturbance, of which 7 are covered in Fig.3 and Table 4 (accuracy of flood and oil palm not being evaluated).
My criticisms are essentially confined to details of presentation and wording. It might be good to have more information on how the types are defined and how time series permit recognition of e.g. recovered areas. On line133 the treatment of ‘vacant areas’ is worrying: more information on this is needed, how big an area is affected?
PRESENTATION DETAILS
101 ‘… America, South …’ comma missing
132 Insert space before ‘in’
140 ‘Considering …’ -this sentence is incomplete, it is just a clause introducing something that is missing.
156 ‘Meanwhile …’ is an incomplete sentence – just a clause. I suggest replacing with ‘Weak disturbances in forest cover are highly time-bound.’
160 Delete ‘are not considered’ - duplication.
166-169 This sentence misuses punctuation (: and ; are repeated). Please re-write.
Fig.3 There is space to replace codes with brief versions of types – e.g. ‘plantation’.
Table 4 118 should be 18
254-260 There should be a space before ±
260 Not a sentence: ‘both …’ implies ‘ …and’
268 ‘Western Siberian Plain in North America’ ??
Fig.4 As each small symbol represents an area (grid square?), the colours must represent density. So ha per … ? Up to 1500 ha, so per at least 39 x 39 km. Please state resolution of this & Fig.5.
Fig.5 ‘Forestry replanting ‘ is inconsistent with text (lines 284, 288 etc.), other Figures (8 & 9) and Table 1 (‘Forestry disturbance’) and does not seem to be used elsewhere.
Actually ‘forestry disturbance’ is an unfortunate term for just one type of forest disturbance – disturbance as a disturbance type. Could it be replaced throughout by ‘forestry replanting’, ‘recovered disturbance’ or just ’replanted’ ?
284-293 Presumably Mha should be M ha
Fig. 6 caption Insert ‘Note varying scales.’
Fisg.6 & 7 maps show density, so it is necessary to state the unit area and (as these are rectangular) its dimensions.
Fig.7 What is the rationale of having red = most in a & b, but red= least in c and d? (For me, a, c and d might be considered ‘good’; b is ‘bad’.). Fig. 6 was consistent with red = most, so readers are going to be confused here.
328-330 This is misleading, based on the inclusion of ‘all’ in Fig.8b. That should be replotted excluding ‘All’. Consistency over the 5 types is thus much less, and the big deviation for Forest fire requires comment.
Figs. 8a, and 9a-d: Note that all show highly skewed distributions of both x and y variables. Calculating regressions on logarithmic scales would reduce the influence of the few high values. It would, however , increase the leverage of the numerous small values: a choice has to be made based on the absolute error margins of small versus large values. Perhaps both types of regression should be presented.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-346-RC1
Data sets
Global forest main disturbance types between 2000 and 2020 Shidong Liu, Li Wang, Wanjuan Song https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28465178
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
369 | 126 | 28 | 523 | 3 | 9 |
- HTML: 369
- PDF: 126
- XML: 28
- Total: 523
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 9
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1