the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Concentration changes of atmospheric F-gases and analysis of their potential sources at Zhongshan Station, Antarctica, 2021
Abstract. As potent greenhouse gases with high global warming potentials, fluorinated gases (F-gases) have emerged as significant contributors to global radiative forcing. Owing to minimal anthropogenic influences, Antarctica provides an exceptional natural environment for investigating background atmospheric F-gas concentrations. This study presents the first comprehensive report of temporal variations in 11 F-gas species at the Zhongshan National Atmospheric Background Station (ZOS; 69.4° S, 76.4° E) throughout 2021. This study is the first to provide concentration changes of 11 F-gases at ZOS in Antarctica in 2021. The datasets are publicly available at the National Tibetan Plateau Data Center at https://doi.org/10.11888/Atmos.tpdc.302283 (Tian et al., 2025). The concentrations of most F-gases significantly increased throughout 2021 at ZOS. The concentrations of F-gases in East Antarctica were greater than those in the Antarctic Peninsula and the interior on the basis of data comparisons with three other Antarctic stations. Back trajectory and clustering analyses using the HYSPLIT model revealed that the contributions of different trajectory clusters were nearly identical at each station. Source apportionment analysis via the PMF model identified industrial processes, refrigeration, fire suppression, and electronics as key contributors to F-gas concentrations in the Antarctic atmosphere. While the one-year observation period precludes long-term trend assessment, these high-frequency measurements capture the baseline variability critical for detecting future anomalies. Continuous multiyear monitoring at ZOS is necessary to establish statistically robust growth rates.
- Preprint
(2252 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(325 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 29 Aug 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2025-282', Anonymous Referee #1, 07 Aug 2025
reply
Review of Concentration changes of atmospheric F-gases and analysis of their potential sources at Zhongshan Station, Antarctica, 2021 by Nan et al.
This study presents the first comprehensive dataset of 11 fluorinated greenhouse gases (F-gases) at Zhongshan Station (ZOS) in Antarctica throughout 2021, comparing results with other Antarctic and Southern Hemisphere stations. The manuscript is well-structured and provides valuable insights into F-gas variability and potential sources in a remote polar environment. However, several key aspects require clarification and improvement to strengthen the scientific rigor and impact of this work.
My main concern is about the data duality and working standards. The discussion on working standards (Section 2.1.2) lacks sufficient detail to assess calibration reliability. The authors may want to elaborate on how the samples got analyzed and how to trace back to AGAGE (or other) working standards. Another suggestion is to include the uncertainties in F-gas measurements, which are critical for later emission inversion studies but are only briefly mentioned.
Figure 2 and related discussion, I am not sure it’s OK to discuss “trend” based on only one year of data. And consider showing error bars on this figure. On a different note, do you see the impact of polar day and night on F-gases?
About the HYSPLIT trajectory clustering (Section 4.2), it appears superficial to me and may oversimplify transport dynamics. I am not sure how polar singularities may impact the trajectory results and thus clustering.
Finally, some sections are overly verbose or lack logical progression. For example, the introduction (Section 1) could be streamlined by focusing on F-gas relevance to Antarctica rather than the general climate context. Results in Section 4.1.3 ("Discrete daily concentration") are fragmented; consider merging with Section 4.1.1 or using subheadings. The PMF source apportionment (Section 4.3) overlaps with Table 3; consolidate for brevity.
Minor Comments:
Page 2, line 34, remove “the issue of”
Page, line 43, change “include” to “including”
Page 2, line 60, change “reaction” to “reactions”
Page 2, line 60, change “atoms” to “radicals”
Page 3, line 55, clarify why F-gases have "zero ozone depletion potential" when some (e.g., HFC-23) are byproducts of HCFC-22 production.
Page 3, line 74, you never define “MP”
Page 7, line 150, specify how AGAGE-NOAA intercalibration offsets were corrected (e.g., scaling factors).
Figure 3, improve readability by using distinct symbols for stations or separating into panels.
Table 2, include detection limits for each F-gas to contextualize variability.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2025-282-RC1
Data sets
Near-surface fluorinated greenhouse gas observations from the Chinese Antarctic Zhongshan Station in 2021 Biao Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.11888/Atmos.tpdc.302283
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
159 | 44 | 25 | 228 | 20 | 11 | 16 |
- HTML: 159
- PDF: 44
- XML: 25
- Total: 228
- Supplement: 20
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 16
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1