the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Global-PCG-10: a 10-m global map of plastic-covered greenhouses derived from Sentinel-2 in 2020
Abstract. Plastic-covered greenhouse (PCG) is widely used in agricultural production due to its temperature control, water conservation, and wind protection characteristics, significantly enhancing crop yields and economic benefits. However, its long-term and extensive use can lead to environmental issues, such as the accumulation of local toxic gases and the degradation of soil physicochemical properties. Therefore, obtaining a comprehensive distribution of PCGs is essential. To monitor PCGs on a large scale, this study developed a novel approach for producing the first global 10-meters PCGs dataset (Global-PCG-10) with high-quality. Firstly, the globe was divided into multiple 5-degree grids, and grids for classification were organized based on global cropland layer. Then, multi-temporal Sentinel-2 data and initial labels of PCGs were obtained through Google Earth Engine (GEE) to create a training set for deep learning. Next, initial labels were optimized with the active learning strategy combined with the deep learning model, APC-Net. Finally, the PCGs classification results were predicted, spatially analyzed, and compared with publicly released land use and land cover (LULC) datasets. Experimental results indicate that the proposed Global-PCG-10 dataset has a high overall accuracy of 92.08 %. The global area of PCGs is 14,259.85 km², and 69.24 % of PCGs are located in Asia, covering around 9,874.51 km2. China has the largest PCGs area of 8,224.90 km2, accounting for 57.67 % of the globe and 83.29 % of Asia. Comparisons with other LULC datasets revealed that PCGs, which should be classified as cropland, are often misclassified as bareland, impervious surfaces, ice/snow, etc.
- Preprint
(9022 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(434 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 26 Feb 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on essd-2024-538', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Jan 2025
reply
Global-PCG-10: a 10-m global map of plastic-covered greenhouses derived from Sentinel-2 in 2020
Manuscript number: essd-2024-538
General comments.
This very interesting paper use machine learning and deep learning on Sentinel-2 10 m GSD images to obtain a global map of plastic-covered greenhouses (PCGs). Really, it is not the first global PCG maps since Tong et al. (2024) already published other global PCG map derived from PlanetScope images, a commercial satellite with 3 m GSD, but using also in the first steps Sentinel-2. Although both works have a similar objective (i.e., to attain a global PCG map), the strategies used were quite different.
Thanks to the attained global PCG map, Niu et al. (2025) give interesting data about the area of PCG around the world, the major concentrations, spatial distribution, etc.
The manuscript is well written and it is worth being published. However, a few specifics comments should be taken into account.
Specific comments.
- Some cites in the manuscript appears with an extra comma. For example, in Page 2, Line 64, the cites “Aguilar et al., (2016) and Yang et al., (2017) independently developed…” should be “Aguilar et al. (2016) and Yang et al. (2017) independently developed…” Similarly, “Zhang et al., (2022a)” in Page 2, Line 66, should be “Zhang et al. (2022a)”. Please, correct this issue throughout the manuscript.
- Page 3, Line 71. The cite (Zhang et al., 2024) should be (Zhang et al., 2024a).
- Page 3, Line 76. Zhang et al., 2023 should be 2023a or 2023b. Please, review it.
- Page 5, Line 139-140. “Actually, Sentinel-2 is a constellation consisting of two satellites, i.e., Sentinel-2A and Sentinel-2B, which are in the same sun-synchronous orbit while phased at 180° to each other”. In fact, there is a new Sentinel-2C. You should speak a little about it.
- Page 6, Line 163. In Figure 2 (Stage 2) the train/validation ratio is 7:3, and in the manuscript you wrote 8:2. Is it a mistake in the Figure?
- Page 7, Line 175. In the caption of Figure 3, you should clarify that the size of the reference samples (512×512) are pixels and not meters.
- Page 9, Line 200. In the caption of Figure 4, it is written Multiple-temporal NDVI. Is not more appropriated multi-temporal NDVI?
- Page 9, Line 205. “1> Spectral features”. Strange login method.
- Page 10, Line 212. “2> Textural features”. Strange login method.
- Page 11, Line 237. You should clarify also in the manuscript that the size of the reference samples (512×512) are pixels and not meters.
- Page 12, Line 273. In Figure 2 (Stage 2) the train/validation ratio is 7:3, and in the manuscript you wrote 8:2. Please review it.
- Page 13, Line 286. Fu et al. (2021) is not in reference section.
- Page 15, Line 332-335. There are some numbers without thousands separation (e.g., 9874.51 km2, 2530.56 km2, 8224.90 km2).
- Page 16, Line 344. Figure 8a is not cited in the manuscript, and it should be.
- Page 18, Line 375. Why 20500 points for GH and 20500 for Non-GH. Justify this figure.
- Page 19, Line 381. Table 1 shows the confusion matrix where OA, User Accuracy (UA) and Producer Accuracy (PA) are depicted. Really, UA=Recall and PA=Precision, so, Table 2 is not necessary. The only data useful in Table 2 is F1 Score. I think that you should rewrite the methods and results about the accuracy assessment. Furthermore, Why is the classification so biased? For example, UA is 99.99% and PA is 86.30% for Non-GH and, UA is 84.18% and PA is 99.99% for GH.
- Page 22, Line 421-422. “… and in May 2024, the University of Copenhagen published a global 3-m PCGs dataset also in 2019”. Please, you should cite Tong et al. (2024) here.
- Page 22, Line 430. You should cite Tong et al. (2024) properly in the caption of Figure 12.
- Page 23, Line 434. “Tong et al., (2024) acquired from 3-m …”. Again, this cite appears with an extra comma.
- Page 30, Line 667. “Zhang, X., Liu, L., and Chen, X.: Global annual wetland dataset Data Descriptor at 30 m with a fine classification system from 2000 to 2022, Sci. Data, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03143-0, 2024c”. This reference do not appear in the manuscript.
Final Comments:
It is very important that the global PCG map and the code are accessible to researchers. I have tested that the code for generating the initial labels of PCGs is publicly available via the following link on Google Earth Engine: https://github.com/MrSuperNiu/Greenhouse_Classification_GEE. It consists of feature extraction, RF classification, etc. Additionally, the code of APC-Net is accessible through the following link: https://github.com/MrSuperNiu/APCNet. The Global-PCG-10 dataset is stored on figshare, and can be downloaded here: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27731148.v2 (Niu et al., 2024).
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-538-RC1
Data sets
Global-PCG-10: a 10-m global map of plastic-covered greenhouses derived from Sentinel-2 in 2020 Bowen Niu, Quanlong Feng, Bingwen Qiu, Shuai Su, Xinmin Zhang, Rongji Cui, Xinhong Zhang, Fanli Sun, Wenhui Yan, Siyuan Zhao, Hanyu Shi, Cong Ou, Xiaolu Yan, Jianhua Gong, Gaofei Yin, Jianxi Huang, Jiantao Liu, Bingbo Gao, Xiaochuang Yao, Jianyu Yang, and Dehai Zhu https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.27731148.v2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
179 | 36 | 3 | 218 | 14 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 179
- PDF: 36
- XML: 3
- Total: 218
- Supplement: 14
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1