Understanding the representativeness of FLUXNET for upscaling carbon flux from eddy covariance measurements
- 1Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
- 2Computer Science and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
- 3Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC, USA
Abstract. Eddy covariance data from regional flux networks are direct in situ measurement of carbon, water, and energy fluxes and are of vital importance for understanding the spatio-temporal dynamics of the the global carbon cycle. FLUXNET links regional networks of eddy covariance sites across the globe to quantify the spatial and temporal variability of fluxes at regional to global scales and to detect emergent ecosystem properties. This study presents an assessment of the representativeness of FLUXNET based on the recently released FLUXNET2015 data set. We present a detailed high resolution analysis of the evolving representativeness of FLUXNET through time. Results provide quantitative insights into the extent that various biomes are sampled by the network of networks, the role of the spatial distribution of the sites on the network scale representativeness at any given time, and how that representativeness has changed through time due to changing operational status and data availability at sites in the network. To realize the full potential of FLUXNET observations for understanding emergent ecosystem properties at regional and global scales, we present an approach for upscaling eddy covariance measurements. Informed by the representativeness of observations at the flux sites in the network, the upscaled data reflects the spatio-temporal dynamics of the carbon cycle captured by the in situ measurements. This study presents a method for optimal use of the rich point measurements from FLUXNET to derive an understanding of upscaled carbon fluxes, which can be routinely updated as new data become available, and direct network expansion by identifying regions poorly sampled by the current network.
Data from this study are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.15486/NGT/1279968
Jitendra Kumar et al.
Jitendra Kumar et al.
Global 4 km resolution monthly gridded Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) data set derived from FLUXNET2015 https://doi.org/10.15486/NGT/1279968
Jitendra Kumar et al.
Viewed (geographical distribution)
23 citations as recorded by crossref.
- New generation geostationary satellite observations support seasonality in greenness of the Amazon evergreen forests H. Hashimoto et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-20994-y
- Forests dominate the interannual variability of the North American carbon sink Y. Shiga et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aad505
- Revealing biogeochemical signatures of Arctic landscapes with river chemistry A. Shogren et al. 10.1038/s41598-019-49296-6
- The newly merged satellite remotely sensed, gauge and reanalysis-based Multi-Source Weighted-Ensemble Precipitation: Evaluation over Australia and Africa (1981–2016) J. Awange et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.148
- The impact of alternative trait‐scaling hypotheses for the maximum photosynthetic carboxylation rate ( V cmax ) on global gross primary production A. Walker et al. 10.1111/nph.14623
- Direct measurement forest carbon protocol: a commercial system-of-systems to incentivize forest restoration and management B. Marino et al. 10.7717/peerj.8891
- Increased carbon uptake and water use efficiency in global semi-arid ecosystems L. Zhang et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab68ec
- Estimating site-specific optimum air temperature and assessing its effect on the photosynthesis of grasslands in mid- to high-latitudes Q. Chang et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab70bb
- Identifying multidisciplinary research gaps across Arctic terrestrial gradients A. Virkkala et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab4291
- Stocktaking the environmental coverage of a continental ecosystem observation network G. Guerin et al. 10.1002/ecs2.3307
- Effect of drought on productivity in a Costa Rican tropical dry forest S. Castro et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/aaacbc
- Fluxes all of the time? A primer on the temporal representativeness of FLUXNET H. Chu et al. 10.1002/2016JG003576
- Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: Insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites J. Nelson et al. 10.1111/gcb.15314
- California air resources board forest carbon protocol invalidates offsets B. Marino et al. 10.7717/peerj.7606
- Coupled and continuous estimation of soil moisture and evaporative fraction within the remotely sensed surface temperature-vegetation index framework W. Zhu et al. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125827
- Large‐Scale Droughts Responsible for Dramatic Reductions of Terrestrial Net Carbon Uptake Over North America in 2011 and 2012 W. He et al. 10.1029/2018JG004520
- Optimizing an Environmental Observatory Network Design Using Publicly Available Data S. Villarreal et al. 10.1029/2018JG004714
- The International Land Model Benchmarking (ILAMB) System: Design, Theory, and Implementation N. Collier et al. 10.1029/2018MS001354
- Using SMOS soil moisture data combining CO2 flask samples to constrain carbon fluxes during 2010–2015 within a Carbon Cycle Data Assimilation System (CCDAS) M. Wu et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111719
- A Multiyear Gridded Data Ensemble of Surface Biogenic Carbon Fluxes for North America: Evaluation and Analysis of Results Y. Zhou et al. 10.1029/2019JG005314
- Terrestrial gross primary production: Using NIR V to scale from site to globe G. Badgley et al. 10.1111/gcb.14729
- Monitoring tropical forests under a functional perspective with satellite‐based vegetation optical depth G. Vaglio Laurin et al. 10.1111/gcb.15072
- The effects of spatiotemporal patterns of atmospheric CO2 concentration on terrestrial gross primary productivity estimation Z. Sun et al. 10.1007/s10584-020-02903-2