Articles | Volume 18, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-845-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-845-2026
© Author(s) 2026. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
A multiyear eddy covariance and meteorological dataset from five pairs of agroforestry systems with open cropland or grassland in Northern Germany
José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Justus van Ramshorst
Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Quanterra Systems Ltd., Centenary House, Peninsula Park, Exeter EX2 7XE, UK
Alexander Knohl
Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Centre for Biodiversity and Land Use, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Lukas Siebicke
Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Dietmar Fellert
Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Marek Peksa
Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Dirk Böttger
Soil Science of Tropical and Subtropical Ecosystems, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Christian Markwitz
Bioclimatology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
Related authors
José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas, Alexander Knohl, Ivan Mammarella, Timo Vesala, Olli Peltola, and Christian Markwitz
Biogeosciences, 22, 4507–4529, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4507-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4507-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The spatial variability of CO2 and water vapour exchanges with the atmosphere was quantified above an agroforestry system and further compared to a monocropping system using a total of four eddy covariance stations. The variability of fluxes within the agroforestry site was found to be as large as the variability between agroforestry and monocropping site, induced by the heterogeneity of the site, which highlights the need for replicated measurements above such ecosystems.
Justus G. V. van Ramshorst, Alexander Knohl, José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas, Robert Clement, Timothy C. Hill, Lukas Siebicke, and Christian Markwitz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6047–6071, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6047-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6047-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we present experimental field results of a lower-cost eddy covariance (LC-EC) system, which can measure the ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide and water vapour with the atmosphere. During three field campaigns on a grassland and agroforestry grassland, we compared the LC-EC with a conventional eddy covariance (CON-EC) system. Our results show that LC-EC has the potential to measure EC fluxes at only approximately 25 % of the cost of a CON-EC system.
Biplob Dey, Toke Due Sjøgren, Peeyush Khare, Georgios I. Gkatzelis, Yizhen Wu, Sindhu Vasireddy, Martin Schultz, Alexander Knohl, Riikka Rinnan, Thorsten Hohaus, and Eva Y. Pfannerstill
Biogeosciences, 23, 1423–1457, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1423-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1423-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
Trees release reactive gases that affect air quality and climate. We studied how these emissions from European beech and English oak change under realistic scenarios of combined and single heat and ozone stress. Heat increased emissions, while ozone reduced most of them. When stressors were combined, the effects were complex and varied by species. Machine learning identified key stress-related compounds. Our findings show that future tree stress may alter air quality and climate interactions.
Beatriz P. Cazorla, Ana Meijide, Javier Cabello, Julio Peñas, Javier Martínez-López, Rodrigo Vargas, Leonardo Montagnani, Alexander Knohl, Lukas Siebicke, Benimiano Gioli, Jiří Dušek, Ladislav Šigut, Andreas Ibrom, Georg Wohlfahrt, Eugénie Paul-Limoges, Kathrin Fuchs, Antonio Manco, Marian Pavelka, Lutz Merbold, Lukas Hörtnagl, Pierpaolo Duce, Ignacio Goded, Kim Pilegaard, and Domingo Alcaraz-Segura
Biogeosciences, 23, 1223–1243, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1223-2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1223-2026, 2026
Short summary
Short summary
We assess whether satellite-derived Ecosystem Functional Types (EFTs) reflect spatial heterogeneity in carbon fluxes across Europe. Using Eddy Covariance data from 50 sites, we show that EFTs capture distinct Net Ecosystem Exchange dynamics and perform slightly better than Plant Functional Types (PFTs). EFTs offer a scalable, annually updatable approach to monitor ecosystem functioning and its interannual variability.
José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas, Alexander Knohl, Ivan Mammarella, Timo Vesala, Olli Peltola, and Christian Markwitz
Biogeosciences, 22, 4507–4529, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4507-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4507-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The spatial variability of CO2 and water vapour exchanges with the atmosphere was quantified above an agroforestry system and further compared to a monocropping system using a total of four eddy covariance stations. The variability of fluxes within the agroforestry site was found to be as large as the variability between agroforestry and monocropping site, induced by the heterogeneity of the site, which highlights the need for replicated measurements above such ecosystems.
Thorge Wintz, Alexander Röll, Gustavo Brant Paterno, Florian Ellsäßer, Delphine Clara Zemp, Hendrayanto, Bambang Irawan, Alexander Knohl, Holger Kreft, and Dirk Hölscher
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2596, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-2596, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Short summary
Short summary
We investigated how the size and diversity of tree patches in Indonesian oil palm landscapes influence the movement of water to the atmosphere and local cooling. Our study shows that larger tree patches increase cooling mainly by supporting greater plant diversity and more complex vegetation structure. These findings suggest that expanding and diversifying tree patches can help manage microclimate and water cycling in agricultural areas.
Jacob A. Nelson, Sophia Walther, Fabian Gans, Basil Kraft, Ulrich Weber, Kimberly Novick, Nina Buchmann, Mirco Migliavacca, Georg Wohlfahrt, Ladislav Šigut, Andreas Ibrom, Dario Papale, Mathias Göckede, Gregory Duveiller, Alexander Knohl, Lukas Hörtnagl, Russell L. Scott, Jiří Dušek, Weijie Zhang, Zayd Mahmoud Hamdi, Markus Reichstein, Sergio Aranda-Barranco, Jonas Ardö, Maarten Op de Beeck, Dave Billesbach, David Bowling, Rosvel Bracho, Christian Brümmer, Gustau Camps-Valls, Shiping Chen, Jamie Rose Cleverly, Ankur Desai, Gang Dong, Tarek S. El-Madany, Eugenie Susanne Euskirchen, Iris Feigenwinter, Marta Galvagno, Giacomo A. Gerosa, Bert Gielen, Ignacio Goded, Sarah Goslee, Christopher Michael Gough, Bernard Heinesch, Kazuhito Ichii, Marcin Antoni Jackowicz-Korczynski, Anne Klosterhalfen, Sara Knox, Hideki Kobayashi, Kukka-Maaria Kohonen, Mika Korkiakoski, Ivan Mammarella, Mana Gharun, Riccardo Marzuoli, Roser Matamala, Stefan Metzger, Leonardo Montagnani, Giacomo Nicolini, Thomas O'Halloran, Jean-Marc Ourcival, Matthias Peichl, Elise Pendall, Borja Ruiz Reverter, Marilyn Roland, Simone Sabbatini, Torsten Sachs, Marius Schmidt, Christopher R. Schwalm, Ankit Shekhar, Richard Silberstein, Maria Lucia Silveira, Donatella Spano, Torbern Tagesson, Gianluca Tramontana, Carlo Trotta, Fabio Turco, Timo Vesala, Caroline Vincke, Domenico Vitale, Enrique R. Vivoni, Yi Wang, William Woodgate, Enrico A. Yepez, Junhui Zhang, Donatella Zona, and Martin Jung
Biogeosciences, 21, 5079–5115, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-5079-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
The movement of water, carbon, and energy from the Earth's surface to the atmosphere, or flux, is an important process to understand because it impacts our lives. Here, we outline a method called FLUXCOM-X to estimate global water and CO2 fluxes based on direct measurements from sites around the world. We go on to demonstrate how these new estimates of net CO2 uptake/loss, gross CO2 uptake, total water evaporation, and transpiration from plants compare to previous and independent estimates.
Justus G. V. van Ramshorst, Alexander Knohl, José Ángel Callejas-Rodelas, Robert Clement, Timothy C. Hill, Lukas Siebicke, and Christian Markwitz
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 6047–6071, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6047-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6047-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
In this work we present experimental field results of a lower-cost eddy covariance (LC-EC) system, which can measure the ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide and water vapour with the atmosphere. During three field campaigns on a grassland and agroforestry grassland, we compared the LC-EC with a conventional eddy covariance (CON-EC) system. Our results show that LC-EC has the potential to measure EC fluxes at only approximately 25 % of the cost of a CON-EC system.
Yuan Yan, Anne Klosterhalfen, Fernando Moyano, Matthias Cuntz, Andrew C. Manning, and Alexander Knohl
Biogeosciences, 20, 4087–4107, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4087-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-4087-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
A better understanding of O2 fluxes, their exchange ratios with CO2 and their interrelations with environmental conditions would provide further insights into biogeochemical ecosystem processes. We, therefore, used the multilayer canopy model CANVEG to simulate and analyze the flux exchange for our forest study site for 2012–2016. Based on these simulations, we further successfully tested the application of various micrometeorological methods and the prospects of real O2 flux measurements.
Xin Yu, René Orth, Markus Reichstein, Michael Bahn, Anne Klosterhalfen, Alexander Knohl, Franziska Koebsch, Mirco Migliavacca, Martina Mund, Jacob A. Nelson, Benjamin D. Stocker, Sophia Walther, and Ana Bastos
Biogeosciences, 19, 4315–4329, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4315-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4315-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Identifying drought legacy effects is challenging because they are superimposed on variability driven by climate conditions in the recovery period. We develop a residual-based approach to quantify legacies on gross primary productivity (GPP) from eddy covariance data. The GPP reduction due to legacy effects is comparable to the concurrent effects at two sites in Germany, which reveals the importance of legacy effects. Our novel methodology can be used to quantify drought legacies elsewhere.
Cited articles
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Goodfellow, I., Harp, A., Irving, G., Isard, M., Jia, Y., Jozefowicz, R., Kaiser, L., Kudlur, M., Levenberg, J., Mané, D., Monga, R., Moore, S., Murray, D., Olah, C., Schuster, M., Shlens, J., Steiner, B., Sutskever, I., Talwar, K., Tucker, P., Vanhoucke, V., Vasudevan, V., Viégas, F., Vinyals, O., Warden, P., Wattenberg, M., Wicke, M., Yu, Y., and Zheng, X.: TensorFlow: Large-scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems, https://tensorflow.org (last access: 20 September 2025), 2015. a
Aubinet, M., Feigenwinter, C., Heinesch, B., Laffineur, Q., Papale, D., Reichstein, M., Rinne, J., and Van Gorsel, E.: Nighttime Flux Correction, in: Eddy Covariance: A Practical Guide to Measurement and Data Analysis, edited by: Aubinet, M., Vesala, T., and Papale, D., Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, ISBN 978-94-007-2350-4, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2351-1, 2012. a, b
Baldocchi, D.: Measuring Fluxes of Trace Gases and Energy between Ecosystems and the Atmosphere – the State and Future of the Eddy Covariance Method, Global Change Biology, 20, 3600–3609, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12649, 2014. a
Barr, A., Richardson, A., Hollinger, D., Papale, D., Arain, M., Black, T., Bohrer, G., Dragoni, D., Fischer, M., Gu, L., Law, B., Margolis, H., McCaughey, J., Munger, J., Oechel, W., and Schaeffer, K.: Use of Change-Point Detection for Friction–Velocity Threshold Evaluation in Eddy-Covariance Studies, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 171–172, 31–45, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.023, 2013. a
Beck, H. E., Zimmermann, N. E., McVicar, T. R., Vergopolan, N., Berg, A., and Wood, E. F.: Present and Future Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification Maps at 1-Km Resolution, Scientific Data, 5, 180214, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.214, 2018. a
Böhm, C., Kanzler, M., and Freese, D.: Wind Speed Reductions as Influenced by Woody Hedgerows Grown for Biomass in Short Rotation Alley Cropping Systems in Germany, Agroforestry Systems, 88, 579–591, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-014-9700-y, 2014. a
Callejas-Rodelas, J. Á., Knohl, A., van Ramshorst, J., Mammarella, I., and Markwitz, C.: Comparison between Lower-Cost and Conventional Eddy Covariance Setups for CO2 and Evapotranspiration Measurements above Monocropping and Agroforestry Systems, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 354, 110086, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110086, 2024. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Callejas-Rodelas, J. Á., Knohl, A., Mammarella, I., Vesala, T., Peltola, O., and Markwitz, C.: Does increased spatial replication above heterogeneous agroforestry improve the representativeness of eddy covariance measurements?, Biogeosciences, 22, 4507–4529, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-4507-2025, 2025a. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k
Callejas Rodelas, J. Á., van Ramshorst, J., Knohl, A., Siebicke, L., and Markwitz, C.: A Multiyear Eddy Covariance and Meteorological Dataset from Five Pairs of Agroforestry and Monocropping Agroecosystems in Northern Germany, GRO.data [data set], https://doi.org/10.25625/A2Z8T8, 2025b. a, b
Cardinael, R., Chevallier, T., Barthès, B. G., Saby, N. P., Parent, T., Dupraz, C., Bernoux, M., and Chenu, C.: Impact of Alley Cropping Agroforestry on Stocks, Forms and Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Carbon – A Case Study in a Mediterranean Context, Geoderma, 259–260, 288–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.06.015, 2015. a, b, c
Cardinael, R., Chevallier, T., Cambou, A., Béral, C., Barthès, B. G., Dupraz, C., Durand, C., Kouakoua, E., and Chenu, C.: Increased Soil Organic Carbon Stocks under Agroforestry: A Survey of Six Different Sites in France, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 236, 243–255, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.011, 2017. a
Cardinael, R., Cadisch, G., Gosme, M., Oelbermann, M., and Van Noordwijk, M.: Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in Agriculture: Why Agroforestry Should Be Part of the Solution, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 319, 107555, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2021.107555, 2021. a
Chapman, M., Walker, W. S., Cook-Patton, S. C., Ellis, P. W., Farina, M., Griscom, B. W., and Baccini, A.: Large Climate Mitigation Potential from Adding Trees to Agricultural Lands, Global Change Biology, 26, 4357–4365, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15121, 2020. a, b
Chen, B., Coops, N. C., Fu, D., Margolis, H. A., Amiro, B. D., Barr, A. G., Black, T. A., Arain, M. A., Bourque, C. P.-A., Flanagan, L. B., Lafleur, P. M., McCaughey, J. H., and Wofsy, S. C.: Assessing Eddy-Covariance Flux Tower Location Bias across the Fluxnet-Canada Research Network Based on Remote Sensing and Footprint Modelling, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 151, 87–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.09.005, 2011. a
Chen, T. and Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System, in: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794, ACM, San Francisco California USA, ISBN 978-1-4503-4232-2, https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785, 2016. a, b, c
Chinchilla-Soto, C., Durán-Quesada, A. M., Monge-Muñoz, M., and Gutiérrez-Soto, M. V.: Quantifying the Annual Cycle of Water Use Efficiency, Energy and CO2 Fluxes Using Micrometeorological and Physiological Techniques for a Coffee Field in Costa Rica, Forests, 12, 889, https://doi.org/10.3390/f12070889, 2021. a
Choe, S., Niu, D., Bischel, X., Schmidt, M., Manu, R., Corre, M. D., and Veldkamp, E.: BonaRes-SIGNAL Crop, Wood, and Leaf Biomass Production, Carbon and Nitrogen Contents in Wood and Leaf Litter (2018–2023), Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), https://doi.org/10.20387/BONARES-BKJE-VB72, 2025a. a, b
Choe, S., Niu, D., Hahn, P., de Waard, R., Langhof, M., Majaura, M., Manu, R., Veldkamp, E., and D. Corre, M.: Optimising Crop Types in Temperate Alley-Cropping Agroforestry Depends on Tree Age [preprint], 2025b. a
Chollet, F., et al.: Keras, GitHub, https://github.com/fchollet/keras (last access: 20 September 2025), 2015. a
Chu, H., Baldocchi, D. D., Poindexter, C., Abraha, M., Desai, A. R., Bohrer, G., Arain, M. A., Griffis, T., Blanken, P. D., O'Halloran, T. L., Thomas, R. Q., Zhang, Q., Burns, S. P., Frank, J. M., Christian, D., Brown, S., Black, T. A., Gough, C. M., Law, B. E., Lee, X., Chen, J., Reed, D. E., Massman, W. J., Clark, K., Hatfield, J., Prueger, J., Bracho, R., Baker, J. M., and Martin, T. A.: Temporal Dynamics of Aerodynamic Canopy Height Derived From Eddy Covariance Momentum Flux Data Across North American Flux Networks, Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 9275–9287, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079306, 2018. a, b
Crameri, F., Shephard, G. E., and Heron, P. J.: The Misuse of Colour in Science Communication, Nature Communications, 11, 5444, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19160-7, 2020. a
Dee, D. P., Uppala, S. M., Simmons, A. J., Berrisford, P., Poli, P., Kobayashi, S., Andrae, U., Balmaseda, M. A., Balsamo, G., Bauer, P., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., Van De Berg, L., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Delsol, C., Dragani, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A. J., Haimberger, L., Healy, S. B., Hersbach, H., Hólm, E. V., Isaksen, L., Kållberg, P., Köhler, M., Matricardi, M., McNally, A. P., Monge-Sanz, B. M., Morcrette, J.-J., Park, B.-K., Peubey, C., De Rosnay, P., Tavolato, C., Thépaut, J.-N., and Vitart, F.: The ERA-Interim Reanalysis: Configuration and Performance of the Data Assimilation System, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 137, 553–597, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828, 2011. a
De Stefano, A. and Jacobson, M. G.: Soil Carbon Sequestration in Agroforestry Systems: A Meta-Analysis, Agroforestry Systems, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0147-9, 2017. a
Dyukarev, E.: Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Regression Models for Filling Temporal Gaps of Meteorological Variables Time Series, Applied Sciences, 13, 2646, https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042646, 2023. a, b, c
El Hachimi, C., Belaqziz, S., Khabba, S., Ousanouan, Y., Sebbar, B.-E., Kharrou, M. H., and Chehbouni, A.: ClimateFiller: A Python Framework for Climate Time Series Gap-Filling and Diagnosis Based on Artificial Intelligence and Multi-Source Reanalysis Data, Software Impacts, 18, 100575, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpa.2023.100575, 2023. a, b
Finkelstein, P. L. and Sims, P. F.: Sampling Error in Eddy Correlation Flux Measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106, 3503–3509, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900731, 2001. a, b
Foken, T., Göockede, M., Mauder, M., Mahrt, L., Amiro, B., and Munger, W.: Post-Field Data Quality Control, in: Handbook of Micrometeorology, edited by: Lee, X., Massman, W., and Law, B., Vol. 29, 181–208, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, ISBN 978-1-4020-2264-7, https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2265-4_9, 2005. a, b
Friedman, J. H.: Greedy Function Approximation: A Gradient Boosting Machine., The Annals of Statistics, 29, https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1013203451, 2001. a
Göckede, M., Rebmann, C., and Foken, T.: A Combination of Quality Assessment Tools for Eddy Covariance Measurements with Footprint Modelling for the Characterisation of Complex Sites, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 127, 175–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.07.012, 2004. a
Gómez-Delgado, F., Roupsard, O., le Maire, G., Taugourdeau, S., Pérez, A., van Oijen, M., Vaast, P., Rapidel, B., Harmand, J. M., Voltz, M., Bonnefond, J. M., Imbach, P., and Moussa, R.: Modelling the hydrological behaviour of a coffee agroforestry basin in Costa Rica, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 369–392, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-369-2011, 2011. a
Gupta, S. R., Dagar, J. C., and Teketay, D.: Agroforestry for Rehabilitation of Degraded Landscapes: Achieving Livelihood and Environmental Security, in: Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes, edited by: Dagar, J. C., Gupta, S. R., and Teketay, D., 23–68, Springer Singapore, Singapore, ISBN 978-981-15-4135-3, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4136-0_2, 2020. a
Haiden, T., Sandu, I., Balsamo, G., Arduini, G., and Beljaars, A.: Addressing Biases in Near-Surface Forecasts, ECMWF Newsletter, https://doi.org/10.21957/ENG71D53TH, 2018. a
Hatfield, J. L. and Dold, C.: Water-Use Efficiency: Advances and Challenges in a Changing Climate, Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 103, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00103, 2019. a
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., De Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 Global Reanalysis, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 146, 1999–2049, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803, 2020. a, b, c
Hill, T., Chocholek, M., and Clement, R.: The Case for Increasing the Statistical Power of Eddy Covariance Ecosystem Studies: Why, Where and How?, Global Change Biology, 23, 2154–2165, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13547, 2017. a, b, c
Howlett, D. S., Moreno, G., Mosquera Losada, M. R., Nair, P. K. R., and Nair, V. D.: Soil Carbon Storage as Influenced by Tree Cover in the Dehesa Cork Oak Silvopasture of Central-Western Spain, Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 13, 1897, https://doi.org/10.1039/c1em10059a, 2011. a
Kanzler, M., Böhm, C., and Freese, D.: The Development of Soil Organic Carbon under Young Black Locust (Robinia Pseudoacacia L.) Trees at a Post-Mining Landscape in Eastern Germany, New Forests, 52, 47–68, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-020-09779-1, 2021. a
Kay, S., Rega, C., Moreno, G., Den Herder, M., Palma, J. H., Borek, R., Crous-Duran, J., Freese, D., Giannitsopoulos, M., Graves, A., Jäger, M., Lamersdorf, N., Memedemin, D., Mosquera-Losada, R., Pantera, A., Paracchini, M. L., Paris, P., Roces-Díaz, J. V., Rolo, V., Rosati, A., Sandor, M., Smith, J., Szerencsits, E., Varga, A., Viaud, V., Wawer, R., Burgess, P. J., and Herzog, F.: Agroforestry Creates Carbon Sinks Whilst Enhancing the Environment in Agricultural Landscapes in Europe, Land Use Policy, 83, 581–593, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.02.025, 2019. a, b
Kessomkiat, W., Franssen, H.-J. H., Graf, A., and Vereecken, H.: Estimating Random Errors of Eddy Covariance Data: An Extended Two-Tower Approach, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 171–172, 203–219, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.019, 2013. a
Kljun, N., Calanca, P., Rotach, M. W., and Schmid, H. P.: A simple two-dimensional parameterisation for Flux Footprint Prediction (FFP), Geoscientific Model Development, 8, 3695–3713, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-3695-2015, 2015. a, b
Langhof, M. and Swieter, A.: Five Years of Grassland Yield and Quality Assessment in a Temperate Short-Rotation Alley Cropping Agroforestry System, Agroforestry Systems, 98, 933–937, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-024-00963-2, 2024. a, b
Lasslop, G., Reichstein, M., Papale, D., Richardson, A. D., Arneth, A., Barr, A., Stoy, P., and Wohlfahrt, G.: Separation of Net Ecosystem Exchange into Assimilation and Respiration Using a Light Response Curve Approach: Critical Issues and Global Evaluation, Global Change Biology, 16, 187–208, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02041.x, 2010. a
Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., and Licata, L.: Detecting Outliers: Do Not Use Standard Deviation around the Mean, Use Absolute Deviation around the Median, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 764–766, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013, 2013. a
Lipson, M., Grimmond, S., Best, M., Chow, W. T. L., Christen, A., Chrysoulakis, N., Coutts, A., Crawford, B., Earl, S., Evans, J., Fortuniak, K., Heusinkveld, B. G., Hong, J.-W., Hong, J., Järvi, L., Jo, S., Kim, Y.-H., Kotthaus, S., Lee, K., Masson, V., McFadden, J. P., Michels, O., Pawlak, W., Roth, M., Sugawara, H., Tapper, N., Velasco, E., and Ward, H. C.: Harmonized gap-filled datasets from 20 urban flux tower sites, Earth System Science Data, 14, 5157–5178, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5157-2022, 2022. a, b
Liu, Y., Lucas, B., Bergl, D. D., and Richardson, A. D.: Robust Filling of Extra-Long Gaps in Eddy Covariance CO2 Flux Measurements from a Temperate Deciduous Forest Using eXtreme Gradient Boosting, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 364, 110438, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110438, 2025. a, b, c
Lucarini, A., Cascio, M. L., Marras, S., Sirca, C., and Spano, D.: Artificial Intelligence and Eddy Covariance: A Review, Science of The Total Environment, 950, 175406, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175406, 2024. a
Lucas-Moffat, A. M., Schrader, F., Herbst, M., and Brümmer, C.: Multiple Gap-Filling for Eddy Covariance Datasets, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 325, 109114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109114, 2022. a, b
Mahabbati, A., Beringer, J., Leopold, M., McHugh, I., Cleverly, J., Isaac, P., and Izady, A.: A comparison of gap-filling algorithms for eddy covariance fluxes and their drivers, Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 10, 123–140, https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-10-123-2021, 2021. a
Mammarella, I., Launiainen, S., Gronholm, T., Keronen, P., Pumpanen, J., Rannik, Ü., and Vesala, T.: Relative Humidity Effect on the High-Frequency Attenuation of Water Vapor Flux Measured by a Closed-Path Eddy Covariance System, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 26, 1856–1866, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1179.1, 2009. a, b
Mammarella, I., Peltola, O., Nordbo, A., Järvi, L., and Rannik, Ü.: Quantifying the uncertainty of eddy covariance fluxes due to the use of different software packages and combinations of processing steps in two contrasting ecosystems, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 9, 4915–4933, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4915-2016, 2016. a, b
Markwitz, C., Knohl, A., and Siebicke, L.: Data Set Supporting Journal Article: Markwitz, C., Knohl, A. and Siebicke, L.: “Evapotranspiration over Agroforestry Sites in Germany”, Biogeosciences, Zenodo [data set], https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4038398, 2020b. a
Massman, W. and Lee, X.: Eddy Covariance Flux Corrections and Uncertainties in Long-Term Studies of Carbon and Energy Exchanges, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 113, 121–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(02)00105-3, 2002. a
Mauder, M., Cuntz, M., Drüe, C., Graf, A., Rebmann, C., Schmid, H. P., Schmidt, M., and Steinbrecher, R.: A Strategy for Quality and Uncertainty Assessment of Long-Term Eddy-Covariance Measurements, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 169, 122–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.006, 2013. a, b
Moffat, A. M., Papale, D., Reichstein, M., Hollinger, D. Y., Richardson, A. D., Barr, A. G., Beckstein, C., Braswell, B. H., Churkina, G., Desai, A. R., Falge, E., Gove, J. H., Heimann, M., Hui, D., Jarvis, A. J., Kattge, J., Noormets, A., and Stauch, V. J.: Comprehensive Comparison of Gap-Filling Techniques for Eddy Covariance Net Carbon Fluxes, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 147, 209–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.08.011, 2007. a
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí-Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Piles, M., Rodríguez-Fernández, N. J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5-Land: a state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4349–4383, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021, 2021. a, b
Murray, F. W.: On the Computation of Saturation Vapor Pressure, Journal of Applied Meteorology, 6, 203–204, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1967)006<0203:OTCOSV>2.0.CO;2, 1967. a
Nair, P. K. R.: Classification of Agroforestry Systems, Agroforestry Systems, 3, 97–128, https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00122638, 1985. a
Ong, C., Wilson, J., Deans, J., Mulayta, J., Raussen, T., and Wajja-Musukwe, N.: Tree–Crop Interactions: Manipulation of Water Use and Root Function, Agricultural Water Management, 53, 171–186, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00163-9, 2002. a
Pancholi, R., Yadav, R., Gupta, H., Vasure, N., Choudhary, S., Singh, M. N., and Rastogi, M.: The Role of Agroforestry Systems in Enhancing Climate Resilience and Sustainability – A Review, International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13, 4342–4353, https://doi.org/10.9734/IJECC/2023/v13i113615, 2023. a, b
Papale, D., Reichstein, M., Aubinet, M., Canfora, E., Bernhofer, C., Kutsch, W., Longdoz, B., Rambal, S., Valentini, R., Vesala, T., and Yakir, D.: Towards a standardized processing of Net Ecosystem Exchange measured with eddy covariance technique: algorithms and uncertainty estimation, Biogeosciences, 3, 571–583, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-3-571-2006, 2006. a, b, c
Pastorello, G., Trotta, C., Canfora, E., Chu, H., Christianson, D., Cheah, Y.-W., Poindexter, C., Chen, J., Elbashandy, A., Humphrey, M., Isaac, P., Polidori, D., Reichstein, M., Ribeca, A., Van Ingen, C., Vuichard, N., Zhang, L., Amiro, B., Ammann, C., Arain, M. A., Ardö, J., Arkebauer, T., Arndt, S. K., Arriga, N., Aubinet, M., Aurela, M., Baldocchi, D., Barr, A., Beamesderfer, E., Marchesini, L. B., Bergeron, O., Beringer, J., Bernhofer, C., Berveiller, D., Billesbach, D., Black, T. A., Blanken, P. D., Bohrer, G., Boike, J., Bolstad, P. V., Bonal, D., Bonnefond, J.-M., Bowling, D. R., Bracho, R., Brodeur, J., Brümmer, C., Buchmann, N., Burban, B., Burns, S. P., Buysse, P., Cale, P., Cavagna, M., Cellier, P., Chen, S., Chini, I., Christensen, T. R., Cleverly, J., Collalti, A., Consalvo, C., Cook, B. D., Cook, D., Coursolle, C., Cremonese, E., Curtis, P. S., D'Andrea, E., Da Rocha, H., Dai, X., Davis, K. J., Cinti, B. D., Grandcourt, A. D., Ligne, A. D., De Oliveira, R. C., Delpierre, N., Desai, A. R., Di Bella, C. M., Tommasi, P. D., Dolman, H., Domingo, F., Dong, G., Dore, S., Duce, P., Dufrêne, E., Dunn, A., Dušek, J., Eamus, D., Eichelmann, U., ElKhidir, H. A. M., Eugster, W., Ewenz, C. M., Ewers, B., Famulari, D., Fares, S., Feigenwinter, I., Feitz, A., Fensholt, R., Filippa, G., Fischer, M., Frank, J., Galvagno, M., Gharun, M., Gianelle, D., Gielen, B., Gioli, B., Gitelson, A., Goded, I., Goeckede, M., Goldstein, A. H., Gough, C. M., Goulden, M. L., Graf, A., Griebel, A., Gruening, C., Grünwald, T., Hammerle, A., Han, S., Han, X., Hansen, B. U., Hanson, C., Hatakka, J., He, Y., Hehn, M., Heinesch, B., Hinko-Najera, N., Hörtnagl, L., Hutley, L., Ibrom, A., Ikawa, H., Jackowicz-Korczynski, M., Janouš, D., Jans, W., Jassal, R., Jiang, S., Kato, T., Khomik, M., Klatt, J., Knohl, A., Knox, S., Kobayashi, H., Koerber, G., Kolle, O., Kosugi, Y., Kotani, A., Kowalski, A., Kruijt, B., Kurbatova, J., Kutsch, W. L., Kwon, H., Launiainen, S., Laurila, T., Law, B., Leuning, R., Li, Y., Liddell, M., Limousin, J.-M., Lion, M., Liska, A. J., Lohila, A., López-Ballesteros, A., López-Blanco, E., Loubet, B., Loustau, D., Lucas-Moffat, A., Lüers, J., Ma, S., Macfarlane, C., Magliulo, V., Maier, R., Mammarella, I., Manca, G., Marcolla, B., Margolis, H. A., Marras, S., Massman, W., Mastepanov, M., Matamala, R., Matthes, J. H., Mazzenga, F., McCaughey, H., McHugh, I., McMillan, A. M. S., Merbold, L., Meyer, W., Meyers, T., Miller, S. D., Minerbi, S., Moderow, U., Monson, R. K., Montagnani, L., Moore, C. E., Moors, E., Moreaux, V., Moureaux, C., Munger, J. W., Nakai, T., Neirynck, J., Nesic, Z., Nicolini, G., Noormets, A., Northwood, M., Nosetto, M., Nouvellon, Y., Novick, K., Oechel, W., Olesen, J. E., Ourcival, J.-M., Papuga, S. A., Parmentier, F.-J., Paul-Limoges, E., Pavelka, M., Peichl, M., Pendall, E., Phillips, R. P., Pilegaard, K., Pirk, N., Posse, G., Powell, T., Prasse, H., Prober, S. M., Rambal, S., Rannik, Ü., Raz-Yaseef, N., Rebmann, C., Reed, D., Dios, V. R. D., Restrepo-Coupe, N., Reverter, B. R., Roland, M., Sabbatini, S., Sachs, T., Saleska, S. R., Sánchez-Cañete, E. P., Sanchez-Mejia, Z. M., Schmid, H. P., Schmidt, M., Schneider, K., Schrader, F., Schroder, I., Scott, R. L., Sedlák, P., Serrano-Ortíz, P., Shao, C., Shi, P., Shironya, I., Siebicke, L., Šigut, L., Silberstein, R., Sirca, C., Spano, D., Steinbrecher, R., Stevens, R. M., Sturtevant, C., Suyker, A., Tagesson, T., Takanashi, S., Tang, Y., Tapper, N., Thom, J., Tomassucci, M., Tuovinen, J.-P., Urbanski, S., Valentini, R., Van Der Molen, M., Van Gorsel, E., Van Huissteden, K., Varlagin, A., Verfaillie, J., Vesala, T., Vincke, C., Vitale, D., Vygodskaya, N., Walker, J. P., Walter-Shea, E., Wang, H., Weber, R., Westermann, S., Wille, C., Wofsy, S., Wohlfahrt, G., Wolf, S., Woodgate, W., Li, Y., Zampedri, R., Zhang, J., Zhou, G., Zona, D., Agarwal, D., Biraud, S., Torn, M., and Papale, D.: The FLUXNET2015 Dataset and the ONEFlux Processing Pipeline for Eddy Covariance Data, Scientific Data, 7, 225, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0534-3, 2020. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., and Duchesnay, É.: Scikit-Learn: Machine Learning in Python, arXiv, https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490, 2012. a
Peichl, M., Thevathasan, N. V., Gordon, A. M., Huss, J., and Abohassan, R. A.: Carbon Sequestration Potentials in Temperate Tree-Based Intercropping Systems, Southern Ontario, Canada, Agroforestry Systems, 66, 243–257, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-005-0361-8, 2006. a, b
Quinkenstein, A., Wöllecke, J., Böhm, C., Grünewald, H., Freese, D., Schneider, B. U., and Hüttl, R. F.: Ecological Benefits of the Alley Cropping Agroforestry System in Sensitive Regions of Europe, Environmental Science & Policy, 12, 1112–1121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.08.008, 2009. a
Rannik, Ü. and Vesala, T.: Autoregressive Filtering versus Linear Detrending in Estimation of Fluxes by the Eddy Covariance Method, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 91, 259–280, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001840416858, 1999. a, b
Rebmann, C., Göckede, M., Foken, T., Aubinet, M., Aurela, M., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Buchmann, N., Carrara, A., Cescatti, A., Ceulemans, R., Clement, R., Elbers, J. A., Granier, A., Grünwald, T., Guyon, D., Havránková, K., Heinesch, B., Knohl, A., Laurila, T., Longdoz, B., Marcolla, B., Markkanen, T., Miglietta, F., Moncrieff, J., Montagnani, L., Moors, E., Nardino, M., Ourcival, J.-M., Rambal, S., Rannik, Ü., Rotenberg, E., Sedlak, P., Unterhuber, G., Vesala, T., and Yakir, D.: Quality Analysis Applied on Eddy Covariance Measurements at Complex Forest Sites Using Footprint Modelling, Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 80, 121–141, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-004-0095-y, 2005. a
Rebmann, C., Aubinet, M., Schmid, H., Arriga, N., Aurela, M., Burba, G., Clement, R., De Ligne, A., Fratini, G., Gielen, B., Grace, J., Graf, A., Gross, P., Haapanala, S., Herbst, M., Hörtnagl, L., Ibrom, A., Joly, L., Kljun, N., Kolle, O., Kowalski, A., Lindroth, A., Loustau, D., Mammarella, I., Mauder, M., Merbold, L., Metzger, S., Mölder, M., Montagnani, L., Papale, D., Pavelka, M., Peichl, M., Roland, M., Serrano-Ortiz, P., Siebicke, L., Steinbrecher, R., Tuovinen, J.-P., Vesala, T., Wohlfahrt, G., and Franz, D.: ICOS Eddy Covariance Flux-Station Site Setup: A Review, International Agrophysics, 32, 471–494, https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2017-0044, 2018. a, b
Reichstein, M., Falge, E., Baldocchi, D., Papale, D., Aubinet, M., Berbigier, P., Bernhofer, C., Buchmann, N., Gilmanov, T., Granier, A., Grünwald, T., Havránková, K., Ilvesniemi, H., Janous, D., Knohl, A., Laurila, T., Lohila, A., Loustau, D., Matteucci, G., Meyers, T., Miglietta, F., Ourcival, J.-M., Pumpanen, J., Rambal, S., Rotenberg, E., Sanz, M., Tenhunen, J., Seufert, G., Vaccari, F., Vesala, T., Yakir, D., and Valentini, R.: On the Separation of Net Ecosystem Exchange into Assimilation and Ecosystem Respiration: Review and Improved Algorithm, Global Change Biology, 11, 1424–1439, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001002.x, 2005. a, b, c, d, e
Richardson, A. D., Mahecha, M. D., Falge, E., Kattge, J., Moffat, A. M., Papale, D., Reichstein, M., Stauch, V. J., Braswell, B. H., Churkina, G., Kruijt, B., and Hollinger, D. Y.: Statistical Properties of Random CO2 Flux Measurement Uncertainty Inferred from Model Residuals, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148, 38–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.09.001, 2008. a
Sabbatini, S., Mammarella, I., Arriga, N., Fratini, G., Graf, A., Hörtnagl, L., Ibrom, A., Longdoz, B., Mauder, M., Merbold, L., Metzger, S., Montagnani, L., Pitacco, A., Rebmann, C., Sedlák, P., Šigut, L., Vitale, D., and Papale, D.: Eddy Covariance Raw Data Processing for CO2 and Energy Fluxes Calculation at ICOS Ecosystem Stations, International Agrophysics, 32, 495–515, https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2017-0043, 2018. a, b, c, d, e
Satish, P., Madiwalar, A. F., Lallawmkimi, M. C., Reddy, K. J., Parveen, S., P, A., Laxman, T., Kiruba, M., and Anand, G.: Agroforestry: Multifunctional Benefits and Implementation Strategies, Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 28, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.9734/jgeesi/2024/v28i10821, 2024. a
Schimel, D., Pavlick, R., Fisher, J. B., Asner, G. P., Saatchi, S., Townsend, P., Miller, C., Frankenberg, C., Hibbard, K., and Cox, P.: Observing Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Carbon Cycle from Space, Global Change Biology, 21, 1762–1776, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12822, 2015. a
Schmidt, M., Corre, M. D., Kim, B., Morley, J., Göbel, L., Sharma, A. S. I., Setriuc, S., and Veldkamp, E.: Nutrient Saturation of Crop Monocultures and Agroforestry Indicated by Nutrient Response Efficiency, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 119, 69–82, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-020-10113-6, 2021. a
Shao, G., Martinson, G. O., Corre, M. D., Luo, J., Niu, D., and Veldkamp, E.: Conversion of Cropland Monoculture to Agroforestry Increases Methane Uptake, Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 45, 1, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00997-x, 2025. a, b
Singh, V., Johar, V., Kumar, R., and Chaudhary, M.: Socio-Economic and Environmental Assets Sustainability by Agroforestry Systems: A Review, International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 14, 521–533, https://doi.org/10.30954/0974-1712.04.2021.6, 2021. a
Sprenkle-Hyppolite, S., Griscom, B., Griffey, V., Munshi, E., and Chapman, M.: Maximizing Tree Carbon in Croplands and Grazing Lands While Sustaining Yields, Carbon Balance and Management, 19, 23, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-024-00268-y, 2024. a
Swieter, A. and Langhof, M.: Cropland Agroforestry 2017 and 2018, BonaRes Data Centre (Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF)), https://doi.org/10.20387/BONARES-AGDC-M0DM, 2020. a
Tikkasalo, O.-P., Peltola, O., Alekseychik, P., Heikkinen, J., Launiainen, S., Lehtonen, A., Li, Q., Martínez-García, E., Peltoniemi, M., Salovaara, P., Tuominen, V., and Mäkipää, R.: Eddy-covariance fluxes of CO2, CH4 and N2O in a drained peatland forest after clear-cutting, Biogeosciences, 22, 1277–1300, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-22-1277-2025, 2025. a, b, c
Tramontana, G., Jung, M., Schwalm, C. R., Ichii, K., Camps-Valls, G., Ráduly, B., Reichstein, M., Arain, M. A., Cescatti, A., Kiely, G., Merbold, L., Serrano-Ortiz, P., Sickert, S., Wolf, S., and Papale, D.: Predicting carbon dioxide and energy fluxes across global FLUXNET sites with regression algorithms, Biogeosciences, 13, 4291–4313, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-4291-2016, 2016. a
van Gorsel, E., Delpierre, N., Leuning, R., Black, A., Munger, J. W., Wofsy, S., Aubinet, M., Feigenwinter, C., Beringer, J., Bonal, D., Chen, B., Chen, J., Clement, R., Davis, K. J., Desai, A. R., Dragoni, D., Etzold, S., Grünwald, T., Gu, L., Heinesch, B., Hutyra, L. R., Jans, W. W., Kutsch, W., Law, B., Leclerc, M. Y., Mammarella, I., Montagnani, L., Noormets, A., Rebmann, C., and Wharton, S.: Estimating Nocturnal Ecosystem Respiration from the Vertical Turbulent Flux and Change in Storage of CO2, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149, 1919–1930, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.020, 2009. a
van Ramshorst, J. G. V., Knohl, A., Callejas-Rodelas, J. Á., Clement, R., Hill, T. C., Siebicke, L., and Markwitz, C.: Lower-cost eddy covariance for CO2 and H2O fluxes over grassland and agroforestry, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 17, 6047–6071, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6047-2024, 2024. a, b, c, d, e
van Ramshorst, J. G. V., Callejas-Rodelas, J. Á., Knohl, A., and Markwitz, C.: Comparison of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Fluxes at Agroforestry and Adjacent Monocropping Sites in Germany, Agroforestry Systems, 99, 147, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01244-2, 2025. a, b, c, d
Vekuri, H., Tuovinen, J.-P., Kulmala, L., Papale, D., Kolari, P., Aurela, M., Laurila, T., Liski, J., and Lohila, A.: A Widely-Used Eddy Covariance Gap-Filling Method Creates Systematic Bias in Carbon Balance Estimates, Scientific Reports, 13, 1720, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28827-2, 2023. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Veldkamp, E., Schmidt, M., Markwitz, C., Beule, L., Beuschel, R., Biertümpfel, A., Bischel, X., Duan, X., Gerjets, R., Göbel, L., Graß, R., Guerra, V., Heinlein, F., Komainda, M., Langhof, M., Luo, J., Potthoff, M., Van Ramshorst, J. G. V., Rudolf, C., Seserman, D.-M., Shao, G., Siebicke, L., Svoboda, N., Swieter, A., Carminati, A., Freese, D., Graf, T., Greef, J. M., Isselstein, J., Jansen, M., Karlovsky, P., Knohl, A., Lamersdorf, N., Priesack, E., Wachendorf, C., Wachendorf, M., and Corre, M. D.: Multifunctionality of Temperate Alley-Cropping Agroforestry Outperforms Open Cropland and Grassland, Communications Earth & Environment, 4, 20, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-00680-1, 2023. a, b, c
Ward, P., Micin, S., and Fillery, I.: Application of Eddy Covariance to Determine Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Balance and Evapotranspiration in an Agroforestry System, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 152, 178–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.09.016, 2012. a
Wilczak, J. M., Oncley, S. P., and Stage, S. A.: Sonic Anemometer Tilt Correction Algorithms, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 99, 127–150, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018966204465, 2001. a
Winck, B. R., Bloor, J. M. G., and Klumpp, K.: Eighteen Years of Upland Grassland Carbon Flux Data: Reference Datasets, Processing, and Gap-Filling Procedure, Scientific Data, 10, 311, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02221-z, 2023. a, b
Wutzler, T., Lucas-Moffat, A., Migliavacca, M., Knauer, J., Sickel, K., Šigut, L., Menzer, O., and Reichstein, M.: Basic and extensible post-processing of eddy covariance flux data with REddyProc, Biogeosciences, 15, 5015–5030, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-5015-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d
Zhu, S., Clement, R., McCalmont, J., Davies, C. A., and Hill, T.: Stable Gap-Filling for Longer Eddy Covariance Data Gaps: A Globally Validated Machine-Learning Approach for Carbon Dioxide, Water, and Energy Fluxes, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 314, 108777, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108777, 2022. a
Zomer, R. J., Neufeldt, H., Xu, J., Ahrends, A., Bossio, D., Trabucco, A., Van Noordwijk, M., and Wang, M.: Global Tree Cover and Biomass Carbon on Agricultural Land: The Contribution of Agroforestry to Global and National Carbon Budgets, Scientific Reports, 6, 29987, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29987, 2016. a
Short summary
A dataset expanding around seventy eight site-years was compiled, harmonized and presented. The dataset consisted in eddy covariance and meteorological measurements over four pairs of agroforestry and open cropland systems, and one pair of agroforestry and open grassland system. This is the first ever dataset compiling this type of data over temperate agroforestry systems.
A dataset expanding around seventy eight site-years was compiled, harmonized and presented. The...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint